Abstract
As the global lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) market continues to expand, the necessity for dependable and secure LIBs has reached an all-time high. However, the use of batteries is associated with a number of significant risks, including the potential for thermal runaway and explosions. The meticulous inspection of LIBs is not only essential for guaranteeing their quality and functionality, but also for ensuring their safety. This underscores the criticality of advanced inspection technologies. In contrast to traditional inspection technologies, industrial x-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning technology affords a non-destructive comprehensive, three-dimensional insight into the interior structure of a battery without the need for disassembly. It can make the inner LIBs structures visible through the housing and even batteries already installed in devices can be examined safely and accurately without being removed or opened. This capability is of critical importance for the identification of defects that could lead to battery failure or safety issues, and guide the optimization of LIBs with better safety and performance. This perspective review briefly summarize the comprehensive application of industrial CT in LIBs including battery materials, cells and modules. Finally, we further discuss the challenges and prospects of industrial CT for energy storage.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The urgent need to address energy saving and emission reduction on a global scale requires continuous exploration of potential solutions.1,2 Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are electrochemical energy storage devices that have been extensively employed in daily life.3,4 They are widely acknowledged as pivotal devices facilitating the transition from finite fossil fuels to sustainable global energy production and utilization.5 Currently, LIBs dominate the power source market due to their high working voltage, large energy density, and good cycling stability, thereby exerting a profound influence on the overall quality of new energy equipment and energy storage systems.6 Nevertheless, the safety concerns associated with internal defects and degradation mechanisms of LIBs have garnered increasing attention in recent years.7 The efficiency of production, quality, and consistency of LIBs products are directly influenced by the detection technology and degree of automation employed in the manufacturing process.8 Therefore, achieving precise and controllable detection of the internal structure of LIBs is crucial for quality control and overall performance optimization.9 The selection of appropriate detection methods for visually identifying the internal structure and defects of batteries is crucial in establishing a comprehensive health monitoring, diagnostic, and early warning system for LIBs.10 This will enhance the reliability of assessing the health and safety status of energy storage systems, ensuring the secure and stable operation of large-scale power stations with LIBs.11
Industrial computed tomography (CT) inspection is a non-contact technology that utilizes x-rays for the purpose of internal structure inspection.2 By employing advanced scanning and reconstruction algorithms, it generates two-dimensional tomography images or three-dimensional images of objects, enabling clear, accurate, and intuitive visualization of the internal structure, composition, material, and defects in the inspected objects.12 This technology is widely recognized as the most effective nondestructive testing and evaluation technology available today.13 Currently, industrial CT testing is employed extensively in the LIB industry for non-destructive examination of internal structures and defects.14 It serves as an indispensable tool for failure analysis and quality control purposes while providing an efficient and precise method for inspecting the internals during LIB manufacturing processes.15 Furthermore, the application of industrial CT testing contributes to the enhancement of product design, improvement of production quality standards, and reduction of safety risks to a significant extent.16 Consequently, it provides robust technical support in the development of new LIB products.17
This perspective review addresses a number of issues related to the deterioration mechanism of LIBs and provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of CT non-destructive testing technology on the internal materials and structures of LIBs.4,18 This review explores process optimization, quality control, and safety improvement from various levels, including battery materials, cells, packs, and modules.19 It also offers an efficacious solution and theoretical foundation for non-destructive testing, failure analysis, and quality control of the internal structure and defects in LIBs.20,21
Results and Discussion
Principle of Industrial x-Ray Computed Tomography (CT)
The fundamental principle underlying industrial CT imaging involves acquiring internal information about an object by leveraging x-ray or gamma ray attenuation laws during their penetration, in which two-dimensional images, or radiographs, are created by x-rays in a cone-beam that passes through an object and projects radiographs onto a flat-panel detector (Fig. 1). During detection, a radiation source emits a focused beam that systematically scans distinct sections/levels of the target object, while an accompanying detector captures transmitted radiation.22 Subsequently, these captured rays undergo conversion to visible light and subsequent transformation into electrical signals which are further digitized via an analog-to-digital converter prior to computer input.23 Employing dedicated reconstruction algorithms, this computational system processes acquired data to generate comprehensive density distributions represented as two-dimensional or three-dimensional images.24
Flat panel CT detection is based on the principle of projection amplification, resulting in a decrease in sample resolution as its size increases.25 To enhance image resolution, two common approaches are reducing x-ray focus and/or employing a higher resolution flat-panel detector.26 However, these methods do not overcome the limitations of geometric magnification for larger samples (> 25 mm diameter). An alternative option involves incorporating optical lenses after x-ray inspection to create an optically amplified image through scintillator lens–charge-coupled device (CCD) detector coupling (Fig. 2).1 This configuration indirectly converts x-ray photons into charged signals by allowing the x-rays to interact with the scintillator, which then converts them into visible light.27 The visible light is subsequently passed through an optical lens and projected onto a CCD for enlargement.28 By implementing this strategy, the effective pixel size of the detector can be reduced by 150 nm, enabling XRM images with a spatial resolution of less than 700 nm.29
The technical advantages of industrial CT include: (1) high resolution, which can provide very high image resolution, so that the small internal structure can be clearly displayed; (2) non-destructive testing, which, due to the use of x-rays or other forms of radiation, will not cause any damage to the object being tested, which is particularly important for the detection of items with high value or that cannot withstand damage; and (3) CT is widely used in various industries, such as aerospace, automotive, electronics, material science, and other fields, for detecting internal defects of components, dimensional measurement, assembly verification, etc.30
With the development of the technology, industrial CT systems are being continuously upgraded to provide faster scan speeds and higher image quality. In addition, there are many different types of industrial CT, including x-ray tomography (XCT), Compton scattering tomography (CST), and Mossbauer effect tomography, which are mainly used for real-time detection of industrial in-line processes and exploration of large industrial components.31 Compared with traditional x-ray inspection and ultrasonic inspection, industrial CT has the characteristics of high spatial resolution and non-destructive testing, which can quickly, accurately, and intuitively find the internal defects of products, such as castings, plastic parts, and ball grid arrays.32 In summary, industrial CT, as an efficient means of non-destructive testing, plays an important role in modern manufacturing and other industries, which not only improves the accuracy of product quality control but also helps to improve production efficiency and to reduce costs.33
Applications of Industrial CT Detection in LIBs Industry
CT is a stereoscopic imaging technology that enables three-dimensional detection of the internal structure of batteries without any blind spots, allowing for comprehensive assessment of various components such as pole plates, pole ears, coated electrode materials, and battery shells. Furthermore, it facilitates evaluation of overall battery structure including packaging and welding outcomes. By examining internal structures and measuring cell dimensions, this technology optimizes production processes and enhances product quality. For instance, it can identify internal deformations and metal impurities in lithium batteries manufactured through winding or laminating processes. Additionally, industrial CT assists manufacturers in identifying and resolving potential safety risks associated with batteries by detecting issues like internal defects, manufacturing process problems, or abnormal temperatures to improve safety and reliability. In cases where batteries exhibit failure symptoms such as increased internal resistance or capacity attenuation due to poor electrode contact,, or uneven electrolyte distribution caused by improper assembly or gas generation during operation, can be analyzed using industrial CT without disassembling the battery. Overall, industrial CT detection technology plays a crucial role in the LIB manufacturing sector. The subsequent section will present the application of CT detection technology in LIBs, encompassing material analysis, cell characterization, and module evaluation.
Battery Material Analysis
CT technology enables a comprehensive 3D visualization of battery components, facilitating the examination of electrode pore structure, particle morphology and surface degradation, dendrite formation, intra-granular cracking, and short-circuit dendrite morphology in solid electrolytes, as well as other alterations in material structure that may contribute to accelerated capacity decline and impact the operational reliability of batteries.21,22,23,24 Paul et al. detected and quantified defective particles by using low-resolution imaging, which has greatly improved material statistics (Fig. 3).34
Daniele et al. proposed a study on nano-CuO anodes of LIBs using a combination of electrochemical measurements and off-site x-ray CT at the nano-scale level (Fig. 4).7 The electrodes undergo transformation reactions with Li+/Li at voltages around 1.2 and 2.4 V during discharge and charging, respectively. The 3D nano-CT imaging reveals significant recombination of CuO particles and precipitation of Li+ conductive films suitable for battery applications.7 The CT detection technique enables the identification of material type and composition, observation of the impact of charge and discharge variations on materials, and exploration into the growth and morphological evolution of lithium dendrites in lithium metal batteries. Miao et al. propose a novel laminated pressure in situ x-ray CT imaging device for the detection of microstructure evolution at the interface during electrochemical processes (Fig. 5).35
The relationship between the electrochemical properties of lithium metal batteries and the interfacial morphology is effectively investigated using this in situ technique. It can be observed that the growth and morphological evolution of lithium dendrites are directly influenced by reactor pressure. Within the critical pressure range, Li dendrites transition from acicular to island-like structures, growing from tip to base. Furthermore, appropriate pile pressure can effectively inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites. This innovative in situ CT imaging technique provides a feasible method for elucidating interface microstructure evolution, electrochemical-pressure complexation, and safety aspects pertaining to next-generation rechargeable batteries.35
Cell Analysis
During the charge–discharge cycle of LIBs, electrode deformation can result in localized high strain and significant capacity degradation. In numerous applications, mitigating risks necessitates comprehending the influence of charge–discharge rates on the electrode structure throughout the battery's lifespan. Cai et al. presented the pioneering application of x-ray CT technique for material parameter analysis in rectangular lithium iron phosphate batteries. The principles of electrode and material identification by CT technology are elucidated, while a detailed summary is provided on the method of tomographic images analysis based on sinusoidal function. Finally, the paper discusses the application of extracting material content and distribution from tomographic images (Fig. 6).36
Wu et al. were dedicated to mitigating the impact of CT imaging time on the charge and discharge processes by implementing a sparse view scanning strategy on traditional CT for rapid imaging. Additionally, they propose an SVRNet model to obtain satisfactory images from sparse projections (Fig. 7a),37 which outperforms other algorithms in terms of reconstruction results. Furthermore, their findings indicate that, during cycling, the deformation of positive and negative electrodes gradually increases while the displacement and strain distribution within the battery's electrodes become uneven (Fig. 7b and c).
Electrodes located near the center exhibit more bending than those closer to the edge. The circulation rate and number of cycles significantly affect internal structure displacement and strain in LIBs with high circulation rates having a greater effect on deformation; therefore, it is best to avoid high current charging or discharging to slow capacity decline and reduce deformation.37
The battery manufacturing process is a critical determinant of LIB performance. In the assembly process, issues such as misalignment and pole plate deflection are inevitable during winding and sealing procedures. Enhancing the quality assurance of LIB production holds paramount importance for the further advancement of the electric vehicle market and its diverse applications. Dayani et al. employed laboratory and synchrotron x-ray computed tomography (XCT and SXCT, respectively) to conduct microscopic in situ investigations on commercially available LIBs. The aim of their study was to offer comprehensive guidance for selecting the most suitable imaging devices and parameters to address scientific inquiries related to LIBs, including quality management during production processes, safety state diagnosis, and evaluation of secondary life possibilities.38 Figure 8 illustrates a comparison between two batteries for SXCT measurements, employing identical scanning parameters. A cylindrical battery featuring a robust metal shell exhibits reduced resolution in the cathode active material compared to a soft-pack battery with a thin shell composed of pliable material (refer to Fig. 8e). The diminished level of detail can be attributed to the high x-ray absorption caused by the thick metal casing, which significantly attenuates x-ray photons. Consequently, this highly attenuated x-ray beam displays lower sensitivity towards weakly attenuated cathode particles. While higher energy levels mitigate casing attenuation and also affect other materials, this decreased attenuation proves detrimental due to the resulting lower contrast. Thus, elevating the x-ray energy does not entirely resolve the challenge of simultaneous imaging of hard and soft materials. In summary, for high-resolution XCT analysis of commercial LIBs, utilizing soft-shell materials in small-scale battery production is more suitable.
Luciana et al. compared two nondestructive testing methods: scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) and x-ray computed tomography (CT), for three-dimensional visualization of defects at various depths within soft-pack batteries. A soft-pack battery with eight electrodes was utilized in the study (Fig. 9).22 Utilizing a 15-MHz transducer in reflection mode, SAM is capable of detecting defects up to a depth of 4 electrodes within a span of 2 minutes, exhibiting a lateral resolution of 150 μm. On the other hand, CT could identify defects across all eight stacked electrodes in the soft-pack battery; however, it required approximately 12.5 hours for measurement. Consequently, these two methods can complement each other in detecting post-production defects within thin soft-pack batteries as a final test on the production line or for repurposing single batteries. Both approaches possess potential to expand the range of non-destructive quality assurance testing in lithium-ion battery production, thereby enhancing safety and productivity within battery technology.
Module Evaluation
Macroscopic imaging of battery modules is crucial for capturing design parameters and evaluating performance and safety issues arising from mechanical and electrochemical instability during the charge–discharge cycle. Furthermore, a single faulty electronic component can lead to the failure of the entire battery module. Once in use, after numerous charge cycles, electrode deformation may occur (resulting in increased gap between the electrode and the active material), leading to delamination of the electrode material from the collector. This delamination hinders electron conduction, causing a drop in voltage across the electrode. XCT can be employed as a non-destructive method to examine these potential problems or defects, assess battery component integrity, and prevent deterioration and safety hazards associated with rechargeable LIBs. Figure 10 shows an example where various components of battery cells and modules are examined using images obtained from a tablet-based CT system (Metrotom 1500; Zeiss), highlighting common macroscopic features and deficiencies relevant to quality assessment. Simultaneously, Fig. 11 illustrates the CT plan and three-dimensional (3D) modeling diagram of the lithium battery module from various perspectives. It is evident that, in certain instances, the integration of non-destructive testing techniques such as CT can yield sufficient detail to elucidate the multi-scale behavior of the battery module.
Conclusions
With the continuous advancement of new energy detection technologies and the imperative to ensure the safety of energy storage systems while minimizing costs, it becomes essential to integrate emerging battery characterization technologies into the relevant measurement/inspection workflow. The utilization of industrial CT presents numerous advantages compare to conventional measurement technologies, encompassing the capacity to conduct component measurements of intricate internal structures within cells by means of high-density information in a non-contact and non-destructive manner, offering morphological insights into electrode materials and structures at various scales, ranging from macroscopic characteristics of battery packs (hundreds of millimeters) to microscopic features at the particle level (tens of nanometers). Different problems, including electrode misalignment, anode overhang, separator integrity, tab weld quality, foreign material detection, electrolyte distribution, internal short circuits, cell and module assembly, density variations, porosity in electrodes, structural integrity of casing, and thermal runaway precursors, can be detected by CT. This paper comprehensively reviews the CT detection technology to ensure the overall structure of the battery on the basis of its internal materials, cells, battery modules and other aspects of comprehensive detection to accomplish the objective of quality control and risk reduction in LIBs. Moreover, the non-destructive imaging capability of CT facilitates the analysis of energy efficiency decline, battery aging effects, and the identification of causes behind battery degradation and failure after multiple charge and discharge cycles. This aids in optimizing battery design, assessing quality, and holds promising prospects for application in battery safety detection and fault analysis.
References
S. Shen, L. Huang, X. Tong, R. Zhou, Y. Zhong, Q. Xiong, L. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Xia, and J. Tu, A powerful one-step puffing carbonization method for construction of versatile carbon composites with high-efficiency energy storage. Adv. Mater. 33(40), e2102796 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202102796.
S.H. Shen, Y.B. Chen, J.C. Zhou, H.M. Zhang, X.H. Xia, Y.F. Yang, Y.Q. Zhang, A. Noori, M.F. Mousavi, and M.H. Chen et al., Microbe-mediated biosynthesis of multidimensional carbon-based materials for energy storage applications. Adv. Energy Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202204259.
S. Cho, J.C. Hyun, S. Ha, Y. Choi, H. Seong, J. Choi, H.J. Jin, and Y.S. Yun, Sulfur-doped hard carbon hybrid anodes with dual lithium-ion/metal storage bifunctionality for high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Carbon Energy (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.288.
P. Liu, Z. Qiu, F. Cao, Y.Q. Zhang, X.P. He, S.H. Shen, X.Q. Liang, M.H. Chen, C. Wang, and W.J. Wan et al., Liquid-source plasma technology for construction of dual bromine-fluorine-enriched interphases on lithium metal anodes with enhanced performance. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 177, 68–78 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.09.001.
A.M. Boyce, E. Martínez-Pañeda, A. Wade, Y.S. Zhang, J.J. Bailey, T.M.M. Heenan, D.J.L. Brett, and P.R. Shearing, Cracking predictions of lithium-ion battery electrodes by x-ray computed tomography and modelling. J. Power Sour. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231119.
Z. Hu, F. Zhang, H. Liang, H. Zhang, H. Wang, T. Wang, R. Liu, J. Liu, Y. Li, and X. Dong et al., Mechanistic understanding of the charge storage processes in FeF2 aggregates assembled with cylindrical nanoparticles as a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries by in situ magnetometry. Carbon Energy 4(6), 1011–1020 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.201.
D. Di Lecce, S. Levchenko, F. Iacoviello, D.J.L. Brett, P.R. Shearing, and J. Hassoun, X-ray nano-computed tomography of electrochemical conversion in lithium-ion battery. Chemsuschem 12(15), 3550–3561 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201901123.
L. Huang, T. Guan, H. Su, Y. Zhong, F. Cao, Y. Zhang, X. Xia, X. Wang, N. Bao, and J. Tu, Synergistic interfacial bonding in reduced graphene oxide fiber cathodes containing Polypyrrole@sulfur nanospheres for flexible energy storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61(44), e202212151 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202212151.
L. Huang, J. Li, B. Liu, Y. Li, S. Shen, S. Deng, C. Lu, W. Zhang, Y. Xia, and G. Pan et al., Electrode design for lithium-sulfur batteries: problems and solutions. Adv. Funct. Mater. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910375.
T.M.M. Heenan, A.V. Llewellyn, A.S. Leach, M.D.R. Kok, C. Tan, R. Jervis, D.J.L. Brett, and P.R. Shearing, Resolving li-ion battery electrode particles using rapid lab-based x-ray nano-computed tomography for high-throughput quantification. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 7(12), 2000362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202000362.
L. Huang, S. Shen, Y. Zhong, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Xia, X. Tong, J. Zhou, and J. Tu, Multifunctional hyphae carbon powering lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 34(6), e2107415 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202107415.
J. Hou, W. Wu, L. Li, X. Tong, R. Hu, W. Wu, W. Cai, and H. Wang, Estimation of remaining capacity of lithium-ion batteries based on x-ray computed tomography. J. Energy Storage (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105369.
C. Li, C. Zheng, F. Cao, Y. Zhang, and X. Xia, The development trend of graphene derivatives. J. Electron. Mater. 51(8), 4107–4114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-09687-4.
S. Hu, J. Xu, M. Lv, Z. Zhu, J. Jia, W. Li, and W. Weng, The application of industrial CT detection technology in defects inspection of lithium ion battery. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2083/3/032075.
B. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, C. Ai, S. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Zhong, S. Lin, S. Deng, and Q. Liu et al., Coupling a sponge metal fibers skeleton with in situ surface engineering to achieve advanced electrodes for flexible lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 32(34), e2003657 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003657.
Q. Liu, R. Xu, D. Mu, G. Tan, H. Gao, N. Li, R. Chen, and F. Wu, Progress in electrolyte and interface of hard carbon and graphite anode for sodium-ion battery. Carbon Energy 4(3), 458–479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.120.
L. Kong, X. Hu, G. Gui, Y. Su, and M. Pecht, Computed tomography analysis of li-ion battery case ruptures. Fire Technol. 56(6), 2565–2578 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-020-00996-w.
M. Olutogun, A. Vanderbruggen, C. Frey, M. Rudolph, D. Bresser, and S. Passerini, Recycled graphite for more sustainable lithium-ion batteries. Carbon Energy (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.483.
Z. Qiu, S.H. Shen, P. Liu, C. Li, Y. Zhong, H. Su, X.E. Xu, Y.Q. Zhang, F. Cao, and A. Noori et al., Plasma enhanced lithium coupled with cobalt fibers arrays for advanced energy storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202214987.
X. Lu, A. Bertei, D.P. Finegan, C. Tan, S.R. Daemi, J.S. Weaving, K.B. O’Regan, T.M.M. Heenan, G. Hinds, and E. Kendrick et al., 3D microstructure design of lithium-ion battery electrodes assisted by x-ray nano-computed tomography and modelling. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 2079 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15811-x.
D. Patel, J.B. Robinson, S. Ball, D.J.L. Brett, and P.R. Shearing, Thermal runaway of a li-ion battery studied by combined ARC and multi-length scale x-ray CT. J. Electrochem. Soc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7fb6.
L. Pitta Bauermann, J. Münch, M. Kroll, S. Enghardt, and M. Vetter, Nondestructive defect detection in battery pouch cells: a comparative study of scanning acoustic microscopy and x-ray computed tomography. Energy Technol. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202300323.
G. Qian, G. Zan, P. Pianetta, and Y. Liu, Perspective—morphology and dynamics of metal dendrites in batteries revealed by x-ray computed tomography. J. Electrochem. Soc. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/acad33.
C. Rahe, S.T. Kelly, M.N. Rad, D.U. Sauer, J. Mayer, and E. Figgemeier, Nanoscale x-ray imaging of ageing in automotive lithium ion battery cells. J. Power Sour. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.039.
J.J. Roy, D.M. Phuong, V. Verma, R. Chaudhary, M. Carboni, D. Meyer, B. Cao, and M. Srinivasan, Direct recycling of Li-ion batteries from cell to pack level: Challenges and prospects on technology, scalability, sustainability, and economics. Carbon Energy (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.492.
A. Ran, S. Chen, S. Zhang, S. Liu, Z. Zhou, P. Nie, K. Qian, L. Fang, S.X. Zhao, and B. Li et al., A gradient screening approach for retired lithium-ion batteries based on x-ray computed tomography images. RSC Adv. 10(32), 19117–19123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra03602a.
C. Schmidt and S.T. Kelly, Lab-based nanoscale 3D x-ray microscopy for failure analysis on advanced semiconductors. Microsc. Microanal. 24(S2), 198–199 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927618013338.
S. Shen, Y. Chen, X. Gu, K. Chen, Z. Qiu, P. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. Xiang, Y. Yang, and F. Cao et al., Juice vesicles bioreactors technology for constructing advanced carbon-based energy storage. Adv. Mater. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202400245.
R.J. Tancin, B. Özdoğru, N.S. Dutta, D.P. Finegan, and B.J. Tremolet de Villers, Direct reuse of graphite and lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) recovered from ultrafast-laser ablation debris in Li-ion battery electrodes. J. Power Sour. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.234027.
H. Villarraga-Gómez, D.L. Begun, P. Bhattad, K. Mo, M. Norouzi Rad, R.T. White, and S.T. Kelly, Assessing rechargeable batteries with 3D x-ray microscopy, computed tomography, and nanotomography. Nondestruct. Test. Eval. 37(5), 519–535 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2022.2070165.
H. Villarraga-Gómez, N. Kotwal, R. Parwani, D. Weiß, M. Krenkel, W. Kimmig, and C. Graf Vom Hagen, Improving the dimensional accuracy of 3D x-ray microscopy data. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac5a30.
D. Wasylowski, N. Kisseler, H. Ditler, M. Sonnet, G. Fuchs, F. Ringbeck, and D.U. Sauer, Spatially resolving lithium-ion battery aging by open-hardware scanning acoustic imaging. J. Power Sour. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230825.
T. Yokoshima, D. Mukoyama, F. Maeda, T. Osaka, K. Takazawa, and S. Egusa, Operando analysis of thermal runaway in lithium ion battery during nail-penetration test using an x-ray inspection system. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166(6), A1243–A1250 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0701906jes.
T.M.M. Heenan, A. Wade, C. Tan, J.E. Parker, D. Matras, A.S. Leach, J.B. Robinson, A. Llewellyn, A. Dimitrijevic, and R. Jervis et al., Identifying the origins of microstructural defects such as cracking within Ni-rich NMC811 cathode particles for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002655.
N. Miao, B. Hai, S. Wang, J. Ni, X. Li, H. Wei, K. Zhang, X. Wang, and W. Huang, An in-situ x-ray computed tomography imaging apparatus with stack pressures for rechargeable batteries. Scripta Materialia (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115381.
J. Hou, H. Wang, L. Qi, W. Wu, L. Li, R. Lai, X. Feng, X. Gao, W. Wu, and W. Cai, Material parameter analysis of lithium-ion battery based on laboratory x-ray computed tomography. J. Power Sour. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232131.
Y. Wu, L. Sun, X. Zhang, M. Yang, D. Tan, C. Hai, J. Liu, and J. Wang, Deformation measurement within lithium-ion battery using sparse-view computed tomography and digital image correlation. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac9c21.
S. Dayani, H. Markötter, A. Schmidt, M.P. Widjaja, and G. Bruno, Multi-level x-ray computed tomography (XCT) investigations of commercial lithium-ion batteries from cell to particle level. J. Energy Storage (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107453.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by Science and Technology Project of the State Grid Corporation of China (Evolution mechanism of performance degradation and status sensing methods for lithium-ion battery energy storage system based on advanced acoustic sensing technology, Grant No. 520627230016), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52372235, 52073252, 22379020, 52002052), Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2023C01231), Key Research and Development Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2022YFSY0004), The Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0487).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, Y., Tian, A., Yan, L. et al. X-Ray Computed Tomography (CT) Technology for Detecting Battery Defects and Revealing Failure Mechanisms. J. Electron. Mater. 53, 5776–5787 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-024-11300-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-024-11300-9