Abstract
Purpose
Biochar and organic amendments can improve soil quality, but their combined effects on plant growth as well as soil microbial functions deserve further investigation.
Materials and methods
We established an 8-month field experiment to explore the effects of biochar (0, 10 t ha−1), organic amendments (10 t ha−1 sheep manure and 2 t ha−1 rapeseed cake), and their combinations on plant growth and soil quality in a Torreya grandis plantation.
Results and discussion
Organic amendments significantly (P < 0.05) increased soil available and total P contents as well as mineral nutrients in leaves. Biochar significantly increased soil available P and K and total K contents. Biochar combined with sheep manure rather than rapeseed cake displayed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in plant quality and soil nutrients in comparison with manure or rapeseed cake addition alone. Biochar combined with sheep manure significantly increased microbial activity (indicated by microbial substrate utilization rate) compared with manure alone treatment. In addition, organic amendments in combination with biochar generally had no significant effects on microbial diversity indices, but they had some interactive effects on some bacterial taxa, such as Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and predicted metabolism functions. Changes in soil nutrient contents were closely linked with soil bacterial community composition and improvements in plant quality.
Conclusions
The results showed that 10 t ha−1 biochar co-applied with 10 t ha−1 sheep manure was suitable for the promotion of soil fertility and plant growth in a Torreya grandis plantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Environmental degradation is one of the greatest challenges in the twenty-first century (Bai et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2019). The increase in the use of chemical fertilizer has caused environmental pollution and soil degradation through leaching and the loss of soil biodiversity, which subsequently affects plant growth (Chen et al. 2014; Cui et al. 2018; Bai et al. 2020). Chemical fertilizers incorporated in the soil can be transformed into soluble compounds, which then leach into adjacent rivers, lakes, and waterways (Bahram et al. 2018; Zheng et al. 2020). This excess chemical fertilization, coupled with ongoing atmospheric N deposition, have caused soil acidification and affected soil community structure and activity in both agricultural and terrestrial ecosystems (Bai et al. 2020; Li et al. 2020). In light of the land degradation and ecological cost caused by chemical fertilizers, it is necessary to advance land management practices to improve soil quality to support sustainable ecosystem development.
Both in the ecologic and economic sense, the application of organic amendments in agriculture and forestry has received increasing attention (Han et al. 2016; Neto et al. 2016). Organic amendments, such as plant residues or livestock manures, are rich in organic carbon, available phosphates (AP), nitrogen (AN), and potassium (AK) sources for plant use (Meng et al. 2005) and can have substantial impacts on soil fertility, aggregation, and microbial activity (Ding and Han 2014; Wang et al. 2017a). Organic amendments have been added to increase soil cation-exchange capacity (Schulz and Glaser 2012), reduce carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in runoff, and buffer soil acidification in tea plantations (Xie et al. 2020). Organic amendments also affect soil microbial C use profiles (Zhang et al. 2012), microbial abundance and diversity, and nutrient availability (Fu et al. 2021). In addition, several studies have shown that the long-term application of manure improves the growth and yield of maize (Meng et al. 2005; Han et al. 2016; Mahmood et al. 2017; Gu et al. 2019).
Biochar, a C-rich product obtained via the thermo-chemical conversion of biomass in an oxygen-limited environment (Kan et al. 2016), is capable of improving soil performance by increasing nutrient concentrations, retaining soil water content, and increasing soil porosity (Lehmann et al. 2011). Biochar-mediated increases in soil porosity can influence soil microbial biomass and community structure by providing a suitable habitat for microbes (Chen et al. 2013, 2018; Gomez et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2014; Palansooriya et al. 2019; Guo et al. 2020). Biochar application may increase soil C storage and reduce nitrate and ammonium leaching (Wang et al. 2017b), and help to increase the availability of nutrients to plants and improve plant growth and crop yields (Kavitha et al. 2018). The properties of biochar and the improvements in soil quality, however, are dependent on the type of biomass used, the pyrolysis conditions, and soil type (Xiao et al. 2018).
Studies have shown that fertilizer co-applied with biochar has a better performance than fertilizer application alone in terms of yield and nutrition concentrations in plants and soil fertility (Glaser et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2017a). Biochar mixed with dairy manure improved the soil pH, organic carbon, C/N ratio, and enzyme activities (Bera et al. 2016). Biochar mixed with organic amendment changed the abundance, diversity, and composition of nitrifying bacteria (Zhang et al. 2017a). A few studies have, however, reported that soil enzyme activities were unchanged with biochar addition mixed with manure (Elzobair et al. 2016), but they suspected the reason was the low amount of biochar added to soil. Schulz and Glaser (2012) found that biochar mixed with fresh leaf compost enhanced the N leaching. Another study indicated that the presence of biochar resulted in the decrease of N mineralization and soil microbial activity when co-applied with organic amendments (El-Naggar et al. 2019). Nevertheless, how biochar co-application with organic amendments affects microbial community structure is still not fully understood.
Torreya grandis (Taxaceae, subgenus Torreya) is an evergreen coniferous tree. China lists this species as a national second-grade key protected wild plant species (Yu 1999). Within this genus, T. grandis cv. Merrillii, a popular nut tree species, is endemic to South China (Li and Dai 2007). Over the years, long-term and improper chemical fertilization not only accelerated soil acidification in T. grandis plantations, but has also led to a lower nut yield due to imbalanced nutrient input, disease outbreaks, and insect infestations (Li 2016; Ye et al. 2018). An effective, sustainable, and nutritionally balanced fertilization method is required to stimulate the sustainable development and productivity of T. grandis plantations. In practice, manure, rapeseed cakes and biochar have been recently used as alternatives in T. grandis forest management. Our previous study demonstrated that biochar addition alone can mitigate the negative effects of soil acidification and land degradation on the nut quality of T. grandis plantations (Zhang et al. 2017b; Li et al. 2020). However, how biochar in combination with organic amendments affects plant growth and the composition and activity of the soil microbial communities remains unclear. We infer that (i) organic amendments, such as sheep manure (SM) and rapeseed cake (RC), can enhance the mineral nutrients concentrations in both soil and plant biomass in T. grandis plantations; and that (ii) SM and RC combined with biochar may perform better for soil fertility and plant quality than organic amendment alone, and they may have interactive effects on soil nutrients and the composition and functional activity of soil microbial communities. To test this, we established a field experiment and investigated the effects of SM and RC amended with and without biochar on the mineral nutrient concentrations in soil and plant biomass and the soil microbial community composition and activity in a T. grandis plantation.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Site description
The experiment site of the T. grandis plantation was located in Lin’an district (30° 14′ N, 119° 42′ E), in the northwestern region of Zhejiang Province, China. The site experiences a subtropical monsoon climate with distinct seasons. The mean annual precipitation is 1613.9 mm, and the mean annual temperature ranges between 4.5 and 28.9 °C. The minimum and maximum temperatures normally occur in January and July, respectively (Zhang et al. 2017b). The T. grandis orchard was established in 2016 with a density of 1000 trees per ha. The heights of the young trees were approximately 120 ± 7 cm height when the present study was conducted. Chemical fertilizer (N:P2O5:K2O 15:15:15, with a rate of 400 kg ha−1 in March before flowering and 350 kg ha−1 in September after the harvest of seeds) had been implemented in this plantation for two years (in 2016 and 2017) to improve the growth of young trees. Chemical fertilizers were incorporated into the 3–5 cm depth soil layer by tillage. The chemical fertilization practice ceased after March 2018 to reduce the legacy effect on soil. The experiment plantation had a loam soil, with a pH of 5.03, total potassium (K) content of 15.71 g kg−1, total N content of 1.2 g kg−1, total phosphorus (P) content of 1.1 g kg−1, and soil organic C content of 9.52 g kg−1.
2.2 Experimental design
The experimental design involved two main factors, namely biochar (application rates of 0 and 10 t ha−1) and organic amendment (non-amended, control; sheep manure, applied at a rate of 10 t ha−1; and rapeseed cake, applied at a rate of 2 t ha−1). Thus, there were six treatment combinations: the control (CK) without organic amendments or biochar, sheep manure (SM) applied at a rate of 10 t ha−1, rapeseed cake (RC) applied at a rate of 2 t ha−1, biochar (BC) applied at a rate of 10 t ha−1, sheep manure at 10 t ha−1 co-applied with biochar at 10 t ha−1 (BCSM), and rapeseed cake at 2 t ha−1 co-applied with 10 t ha−1 biochar (BCRC). The type and the amount of organic amendment were chosen in accordance with the amounts typically applied by local farmers that are optimal for plant growth. The biochar application rate was at a mid-range level, which was based on previous research studies that assessed both microbial and plant responses (Biederman and Harpole 2013; Gomez et al. 2014). The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with three replications of each treatment. Biochar was produced from rice straw through slow pyrolysis (500 °C) with a 5-h residence time in Liyang Desheng Activated Carbon Factory, Jiangsu Province, China. Organic amendment was obtained from Hangzhou Nianfeng Organic Fertilizer Co., Ltd. The chemical properties of the biochar and organic amendments are provided in Table S1. In November 2018, a 30-cm wide and 20-cm deep circular trench was excavated at 40 cm away from each tree body, and the biochar and/or organic amendments were incorporated into the soil at a depth of 20 cm in each trench for each treatment. For the combined treatments of BCSM and BCRC, the biochar and organic amendments were first thoroughly mixed and then incorporated into the soil. For the CK treatment, the soil was excavated and processed in the same way with other treatments.
Samples of topsoil (0–20 cm) were collected on August 1, 2019, 1 year after biochar and organic amendment treatments. Five soil cores were randomly selected from each circular trench around each tree trunk. The five soil samples were mixed and homogenized into a composite sample, and about 10 g of fresh soil was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to DNA extraction. The rest of each composite sample was transferred immediately to a polyethylene bag and placed on ice before being transported to the laboratory. A portion of each sample was passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4 °C prior to Biolog analysis. The remaining sample was air-dried at room temperature and held for physicochemical analysis. In August 2019, 20 current leaves and 20 fresh nuts of T. grandis were randomly collected from each tree. After cutting and homogenizing the leaves, 5 g of fresh leaves was used for chlorophyll measurement. The remaining leaves were dried to a constant mass at a temperature of 65 °C and ground prior to further analysis.
2.3 Analysis of soil chemical properties
The soil pH was determined using a pH meter (FE20 pH meter, Mettler Toledo GmbH, Greifensee, Switzerland) with a soil to water ratio of 1:2.5 (w/v). Soil organic carbon (SOC) was measured by the K2Cr2O7 titration method. Total N (TN) was determined by the Kjeldahl method, while total phosphorus (TP) and potassium (TK) were analyzed using the HNO3-H2SO4-HClO4 method. The available N (AN) was determined using the hot alkaline hydrolysis method, the available phosphorus (AP) was analyzed colorimetrically through the molybdenum antimony blue method after being extracted from the soil with an NH4F solution, and available K (AK) was determined using CH3COONH4 extraction-flame photometry. In addition, NO3−-N was extracted using saturated calcium sulfate, NH4+-N was extracted using 2 M KCl, and extracts were measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (UV-2600, Kyoto, Japan). All the mentioned soil properties were determined based on the protocol described by Lu (1999).
2.4 Analysis of leaf nutrients and nut quality of T. grandis
The leaf samples were wet digested using the H2SO4-H2O2 method; the potassium (K), zinc (Zn), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca) content of the T. grandis leaves were analyzed using the flame photometric method, while leaf P content was analyzed by molybdenum antimony blue colorimetry. The leaf N content was measured by the Kjeldahl procedure. All of the above leaf properties were assayed following the protocol described by Lu (1999). Chlorophyll of chopped leaves was extracted with 95% alcohol, and the concentration of each sample was measured and analyzed in terms of absorbance at 470, 649, and 664 nm (Lichtenthaler 1987). Length, width, and weight of 20 fresh nuts were measured.
2.5 Soil DNA extraction, sequencing and bioinformatics analyses
Soil DNA for each sample was isolated from a 0.25-g soil sample using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR primer sets (338 F and the 806 R PCR) were used to amplify the V3 and V4 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (Caporaso et al. 2010). The PCR mix was prepared in a 20-µl tube containing 4 µl of 5 × FastPfu Buffer, 2 µl of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 µl of each primer (5 µM), 0.4 µl of the Fast Pfu Polymerase (TransGen, China), 0.2 µl of BSA, 10 ng of template DNA, and DNA-free water. After initial denaturation (95 °C for 3 min), 27 cycles of denaturation (30 s, 95 °C), annealing (30 s, 55 °C), and elongation (45 s, 72 °C) were performed followed by a final extension for 10 min (72 °C). The PCR products were visualized in a 2% agarose gel using electrophoresis. Sequencing was done using a MiSeq 2000 sequencing system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) performed at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd.
Raw sequence reads were de-multiplexed, quality-filtered using Fastp, and processed using FLASH (Tanja and Salzberg 2011). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were delineated at 97% sequence similarity using Usearch (vers. 7.0, http://drive5.com/uparse/) and an agglomerative clustering algorithm. Community alpha diversity indices were generated based on the obtained OTUs using QIIME. Function predictions were derived from the bacterial community data obtained based on the OTUs table using Phylogentic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) (Langille et al. 2013). Prior to function prediction, OTUs were normalized by dividing each OTU against known 16S rRNA gene copy numbers. Function predictions were categorized into Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (Chen et al. 2019).
2.6 Biolog analysis
The microbial community-level physiological profiles were measured using Biolog-ECO plates according to the procedure described by Girvan et al. (2003). Briefly, 10-g aliquots (dry-weight equivalent) were shaken with 100 ml sterile water, diluted by a factor of 1000, and inoculated (125-μl aliquot) into a microplate well. All plates were incubated at 25 °C for 168 h, and absorbance at 590 nm was recorded every 24 h for 7 days. The average well color development (AWCD) value was calculated for each sample at each time point. Utilization scores of the six substrate groups (including carbohydrates, amino acids, carboxylic acids, amines, polymers, and phenolic compounds) were analyzed at 168 h.
2.7 Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 (IBM, Chicago, USA) and Origin Pro 8.6 (Origin Lab, Northampton, CA, USA). A two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of organic amendment, biochar, and their interaction on soil and plant properties. A multiple comparison of means was conducted using a Duncan test at α = 0.05. Normality and variance homogeneity requirements were met, and no data transformation was necessary. The relationships between soil quality and leaf characteristics were tested with Pearson correlation. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to account for relationships among the microbial community and environmental factors.
3 Results
3.1 Soil chemical properties
Both organic amendment and biochar had notable effects on soil chemical properties (Table 1). AP and TP contents were significantly higher under the SM and RC treatments than in the CK. The soil AP, TP, and TK contents were significantly (P < 0.05) higher by 204.3%, 44.1%, and 62.5%, respectively, in the soils of biochar amendments compared to CK. SM displayed significantly higher soil NO3−-N content than RC. In contrast, the NH4+-N content was higher in RC than in SM (P < 0.05). The interactive effects of organic amendment and biochar application were significant for AN, AP, TN, TP, TK, and SOC.
3.2 Plant properties
SM, RC, and biochar application significantly increased leaf P and Mg contents but had no effect on leaf N content (Table 2). The addition of biochar significantly increased the length, width, and fresh weight of nuts by 11.6%, 3.9%, and 17.6%, respectively (P < 0.05), in comparison with CK, whereas no significant changes in nut width were observed under SM and RC fertilizer application. Organic amendment and biochar applications displayed significant interaction for leaf and nut properties, except for leaf N, nut width, and fresh weight.
3.3 Soil bacterial community abundance and community composition
A total of 998,298 quality bacterial sequences ranging from 41,038 to 73,407 sequences per sample (55,461 on average), and 6919 OTUs were detected in the T. grandis plantation soil. The OTU numbers as well as the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices did not differ between the six treatments, except for the Chao1 diversity, which increased with biochar treatment (Table 3).
The most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria, followed by Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, adding up to 85.8% relative abundance (Fig. 1). The SM treatment displayed a significantly higher relative abundance of Proteobacteria, but a lower abundance of Acidobacteria in comparison with RC. The abundance of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes showed, however, under biochar with the organic amendments, BCSM and BCRC, no significant differences. The relative abundance of Latescibacteria was significantly higher under the RC treatment. The combination of biochar and organic amendment treatment had interactive effects on the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, which were most abundant in the whole study. Some OTUs of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteriodetes also had interactive effects (Table 4).
At the genus level, the bacterial communities were dominated by the following taxa: norank_c_Acidobacteria (average of 10.8%), norank_f_Anaerolineaceae (4.8%), norank_f_Gemmatimonadaceae (3.5%), norank_f_Nitrosomonadaceae (3.1%), and Acidothermus (1.8%) (Table 4). The norank_f_BIrii41 was significantly more abundant in the SM treatment compared to RC. The abundance of Acidothermus (Actinobacteria) increased significantly with the addition of biochar. The relative abundances of genera Candidatus_Solibacter and Bryobacter increased significantly in the BCSM treatment, in comparison with SM alone (Table 4).
3.4 Prediction of metabolic function of bacterial communities
The PICRUSt analysis yielded a total of 46 level 2 KEGG Orthology groups (KOs). Twelve gene families of metabolic functions were detected with the algorithm, and half of them were affected by the application of organic amendment (Table 5). The predicted relative abundance of gene families related to the glycan biosynthesis and metabolism increased significantly under RC compared with SM. Biochar and organic amendment showed significant interactive effects on many predicted metabolic functions, except for carbohydrate metabolism, global and overview maps, energy metabolism, and metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (Table 5).
3.5 Microbial substrate utilization rate
Biolog analysis used for getting substrate utilization rates of the six treatments showed that the AWCD values increased rapidly from 24 to 96 h, and then gradually decreased after 96 h of incubation across all six treatments (Fig. 2). RC treatment showed significantly higher AWCD values than CK, but SM displayed significantly lower substrate use activity. The addition of biochar together with organic amendment treatments yielded contrasting results in substrate utilization activity; the BCSM displayed a significant increase in microbial metabolism compared with the SM treatment, but the BCRC showed a significant reduction in soil microbial metabolic activity in comparison to RC alone. The microbial substrate utilization scores of amino acids and carboxylic acids increased significantly under the RC in comparison to SM (Fig. 3). The microbial substrate utilization scores of polymers, carbohydrates, phenolic compounds, and amine contents were not significantly different among the six treatments.
3.6 Linkages between soil chemical properties, plant properties and the soil microbial community
The RDA ordination plots (Fig. 4) showed that the composition of the soil bacterial community changed significantly with changes in AK (R2 = 0.4689, P = 0.008) and NO3−-N (R2 = 0.327, P = 0.044), while pH, AN, SOC, and the C/N ratio concentration had no significant effects on the community. Leaf P correlated positively with the AP and TP concentration (P < 0.05, Table S2). Soil NO3−-N was significantly and negatively correlated with carboxylic acid, while soil NH4+-N was positively correlated with phenolic compounds (Table S2).
4 Discussion
4.1 Effects of organic amendments and biochar addition on soil quality parameters
In partial support of our first hypothesis, both AP and TP contents were significantly higher in the sheep manure and rapeseed cake treatments than in control (Table 1), showing that organic amendments helped to increase soil P concentrations (Fu et al. 2021). The NO3−-N content was higher in sheep manure than rapeseed cake treatment that most likely is connected to the high ammonium N (NH4+-N) content of sheep manure, which is subjected to ammonium oxidation and nitrification. (Yang et al 2017). Organic fertilizer has been reported to reduce the leaching of inorganic nitrogen (Gu et al. 2019; Xie et al. 2020). In the current study, the addition of biochar resulted in clear improvements in soil AP, TP, and TK in the T. grandis, which was consistent with previous studies (Zhang et al. 2017b; Li et al. 2020). When biochar was added together with sheep manure and rapeseed cake, the positive effect of organic amendment on soil quality parameters was maintained but varied with organic amendment type. Biochar combined with sheep manure rather than rapeseed cake displayed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in soil nutrients, such as TP, TN, and SOC contents. These findings may be related to the properties of organic amendments and their different interactions between each other, which is in line with a previous report showing that biochar mixed with dairy manure results in improved soil ecological functioning and higher soil C sequestration potential (Bera et al. 2016).
4.2 Effects of organic amendments and biochar addition on plant properties
Our study showed that the leaf P concentration was significantly higher under rapeseed cake in comparison to the control (Table 2), whereas it decreased significantly under rapeseed cake co-applied with biochar. This result was consistent with previous reports stating that organic amendments increased mineral nutrient contents in plants, but the addition of biochar led to an opposite result (Gent 2002; Glaser et al. 2015). This may be explained by the low efficiency of P adsorption and desorption caused by the addition of biochar (Morales et al. 2014). We found that leaf P content had significant and positive correlations with soil AP and TP (Table S2), which supports the concept that soil P concentration affects the P content in the leaves and plant biomass (Geesing et al. 2000). The chlorophyll and leaf Ca concentrations were tightly correlated with seed quality and yield (Santos et al. 2013; Chen 2018), and increased significantly under the rapeseed cake treatment compared to control (Table 2). The combination of rapeseed cake with biochar did not, however, promote nutrient accumulation in leaves in comparison with rapeseed cake alone. In contrast, sheep manure treatment significantly increased most of the plant and soil parameters compared with control, and biochar in combination with manure had some significant synergistic effects (Table 2). Thus, our study demonstrated that biochar co-applied with sheep manure can improve soil and plant quality more than sheep manure addition alone, supporting our second hypothesis that biochar co-applied with organic amendment would have interactive effects on plant quality, depending on the characteristics of the organic amendment type (Bonanimi et al. 2017).
4.3 Effects of organic amendments and biochar addition on soil bacteria community diversity and abundance
Short-term fertilization with organic amendments and biochar did not have a clear impact on diversity of microbial communities. The fertilization impact was detected on relative bacterial abundance level showing differences among treatments. Differences in abundance was detected among the dominant phyla in treated soil and specific OTUs were observed that clearly correlated with treatments (Tables 3 and 4, Fig. 1). Studies have shown that the abundance and diversity of bacterial groups are correlated with specific soil parameters and the type of fertilizer used (Xu et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2015; Gu et al. 2019).
The most abundant phyla in our study, Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria, responded differently to organic amendments. The Proteobacteria lineages are known as copiotrophic, which increase their abundances when there are more easily available carbon substrates in soil (Fierer et al. 2012). In contrast, Acidobacteria phyla harbor several lineages that are oligotrophic in nature which use less accessible carbon compounds and they have clearly slower growth rates (Fierer et al. 2007, 2012). We observed a higher NO3−-N content in the sheep manure treated plantation soil that introduced excess NH4+-N, which suggested active bacterial ammonia oxidation compared with rapeseed cake (Table 1). Bacterial ammonia oxidizers (AOB) conducting ammonium oxidation and nitrifiers belong to the Proteobacteria, which may partly explain the higher abundance of Proteobacteria in sheep manure-treated soil as they are favored in short term fertilization treatments (Tables 1 and 4) (Ying et al. 2017). Previous studies have also shown that NO3−-N correlates positively with Proteobacteria (Rotaru et al. 2010; Trump et al. 2011). The relative abundance of norank_f_BIrii41 (Proteobacteria) differed significantly between the sheep manure and rapeseed cake treatments and was clearly more abundant in the sheep manure treatment (Table 4). It has been demonstrated that Acidobacteria can use sugars and amino acids as carbon sources for growth (Challacombe et al. 2011; Kalam et al. 2020). Thus, the higher utilization scores of amino and carboxylic acids in rapeseed cake compared with that of sheep manure supports our results of higher Acidobacteria abundance (Fig. 3).
Latescibacteria represent a ubiquitous member of the Fibrobacteres–Chlorobi–Bacteroidetes super phylum (Youssef et al. 2015; Farag et al. 2017). Our study showed that the relative abundance of Latescibacteria increased in all plots with organic amendments but was most significant in the rapeseed cake treatment, while rapeseed cake was also accompanied by higher metabolic activity towards amino and carboxylic acids (Figs. 1 and 3). The predicted metabolic function results showed a similar trend of glycan biosynthesis and metabolism (Table 5). This is well in line with other reports that indicate the members of Latescibacteria play an important role in the degradation of proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides present in plants and soil (Farag et al. 2017). Thus, our results suggested that rapeseed cake addition activated Latescibacteria involved in the utilization of amino and carboxylic acids. These results are in accordance with our hypothesis that the two organic amendments (sheep manure and rapeseed cake) may have interactive effects on the composition and functional activity of soil bacterial communities.
We observed a higher relative abundance of Actinobacteria with biochar addition compared to control, whereas their abundance decreased in mixed fertilization (Fig. 1). Actinobacteria are oligotrophic and have been found to be enhanced in soils amended with biochar (Khodadad et al. 2011; Palansooriya et al. 2019). Actinobacteria play an important role in the decomposition of organic matter and can preferentially use biochar-derived C instead of native soil organic matter (Dai et al. 2017). Members of the Actinobacteria genus Acidothermus detected in our study can produce thermostable cellulose-degrading enzymes (Challacombe et al. 2011). The relative abundance of Actinobacteria decreased in mixed fertilization, possibly because sheep manure and rapeseed cake provided large amounts of easily available organic C, favoring copiotrophic Proteobacteria (Table S1). Bacteroidetes is thought to be involved in the degradation of complex organic matter, especially in the degradation of polysaccharides and proteins (Thomas et al. 2011; Delgadobaquerizo et al. 2017). Previous studies have shown that Bacteroidetes prefer to use C substrates from organic amendment rather than from biochar (Delgadobaquerizo et al. 2017; Wolińska et al. 2017), which may explain the significant decrease in the abundance of Bacteroidetes under biochar addition compared to organic amendment. Indeed, a number of Bacteroidetes taxa act as key predictors of soil multi-functionality (Wolińska et al. 2017). At the genus level, the relative abundances of Candidatus_Solibacter and Bryobacter (Acidobacteria) were significantly increased with biochar combined with sheep manure (Table 4). Solibacter plays an important role in metabolic activity and disease resistance and provides a regulatory advantage in the soil environment (Challacombe et al. 2011). In a long-term chemical fertilization study, naturally grown walnut trees promoted some beneficial bacteria such as , Nitrospira, Pseudomonas, and Candidatus_Solibacter (Bai et al. 2020).
4.4 Effects of organic amendments and biochar on soil microbial metabolic activity
In our study, the microbial metabolic activity measured by Biolog Eco Plates was significantly higher under the rapeseed cake treatment than under sheep manure (Fig. 2). Similar results reported by Zhang et al. (2012) showed higher microbial activity in plant residues from farms than from manure. Liu et al. (2016) revealed that microbial activity increased significantly in soil with a decreased substrate C/N ratio. Rapeseed cake has a lower C/N ratio and can be decomposed more easily than sheep manure (Table S1), since it can better satisfy the nutrient demand of microbes (Nguyen et al. 2016). Biochar amendment had no significant effect on soil microbial metabolic activity compared to control (Fig. 2), which was consistent with results of Steinbeiss et al. (2009), who also reported little effect of biochar amendment on the soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. The microbial metabolic activity may decrease in soil with a decrease in soil nutrient content (Lagerström et al. 2009), which explains the changes in microbial activity under the rapeseed cake co-applied with biochar treatment where soil nutrients decreased with addition of biochar (Table 1 and Fig. 2). This is in accordance with our hypothesis that sheep manure and rapeseed cake combined with biochar have interactive effects on soil nutrients and the composition and functional activity of soil microbial communities.
The microbial substrate use rates for different carbon source was higher under rapeseed cake than under sheep manure, which may indicate a selection for specific microorganisms that can use more amino acids and carboxylic acids under rapeseed cake (Fig. 3) (Farag et al. 2017; Kalam et al. 2020). Rapeseed cake treatment had more nutrient and labile substrates than sheep manure, which may have stimulated microbial activity and nutrient transformation in the soil, as reported by Liang et al. (2007) who studied the effect of plant materials on the microbial transformation of amino sugars. One explanation to lower functional activity in sheep manure could also be that the excess ammonia in sheep manure was already metabolized earlier under the previous higher functional activity (Table 1). A previous study indicated that the use of amino acids, carboxylic acids, and phenolic compounds by microorganisms was promoted under straw fertilizer (Shi et al. 2010), since the amino acids in straw residues provided readily available nutrient sources for soil microorganisms (Vinolas et al. 2001). We observed that carboxylic acids had significant negative correlations with soil NO3−-N (Table S2), accompanied by low levels of NO3−-N in rapeseed cake (Table 1). Our results indicated that alterations in soil nutrient availability under biochar and organic fertilization were important factors affecting soil microbial community activity in terms of the substrate metabolism rate. The soil microbial activity was significantly affected by biochar and organic amendments, but their interactive effects varied depending on the kind of organic amendment used. According to our findings combining organic agricultural waste for reuse with biochar is a plausible solution for combating the overall negative effects of traditional inorganic fertilization, causing acidification and a higher carbon footprint. Lower amounts of relatively expensive biochar can be applied, especially in combination with organic, environmentally friendly soil amendments.
5 Conclusion
In summary, our study demonstrated that organic amendments, such as rapeseed cake and sheep manure, improved plant quality and soil chemical properties in the T. grandis plantation. Their co-application with biochar had contrasting effects on the soil and plant quality, where sheep manure combined with biochar had a better performance. Biochar combined with sheep manure significantly increased the microbial metabolic activity compared with manure addition alone. In general, organic amendments in combination with biochar had no significant effects on microbial diversity indices and predicted metabolism functions. Application of biochar combined with sheep manure may be the better management strategy in the short term in T. grandis plantations, but long-term studies will show how the trends observed in this field study will prevail.
Data sharing and accessibility
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. The database or raw data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- SM:
-
Sheep manure
- RC:
-
Rapeseed cake
- BC:
-
Biochar
- BCSM:
-
Sheep manure co-applied with biochar
- BCRC:
-
Rapeseed cake co-applied with biochar
References
Bahram M, Hidebrand F, Forslund SK et al (2018) Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560:233–237
Bai Y, Chang Y, Hussain M, Lu B, Pei D (2020) Soil chemical and microbiological properties are changed by long-term chemical fertilizers that limit ecosystem functioning. Microorganisms 8:1–21
Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME (2010) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manage 24:223–234
Bera T, Collins HP, Alva AK, Purakayastha TJ, Patra AK (2016) Biochar and manure effluent effects on soil biochemical properties under corn production. Appl Soil Ecol 107:360–367
Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202–214
Bonanimi G, Ippolito F, Cesarano G, Nanni B, Lombardi N, Rita A, Saracino A, Scala F (2017) Biochar as plant growth promoter: better off alone or mixed with organic amendments? Front Plant Sci 8:1–12
Caporaso J, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman F, Costello E, Fierer N, Peña A, Goodrich J, Gordon J (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336
Challacombe JF, Eichorst SA, Hauser L, Land M, Xie G, Kuske CR (2011) Biological consequences of ancient gene acquisition and duplication in the large genome of Candidatus Solibacter usitatus Ellin6076. PLoS One 6:e24882
Chen J, Liu X, Zheng J, Zhang B, Yu X (2013) Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Appl Soil Ecol 71:33–44
Chen J, Chen D, Xu Q, Fuhrmann JJ, Xuan S (2018) Organic carbon quality, composition of main microbial groups, enzyme activities, and temperature sensitivity of soil respiration of an acid paddy soil treated with biochar. Biol Fert Soils 55:185–197
Chen J, Wu Q, Li S, Ge J, Fuhrmann JJ (2019) Diversity and function of soil bacterial communities in response to long-term intensive management in a subtropical bamboo forest. Geoderma 354:113894
Chen L (2018) The research on the effect of calium on the development of hazel fruits and the calium-related gene regulatory network, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (in Chinese)
Chen X, Cui Z, Fan M, Vitousek P, Ming Z, Ma W, Wang Z, Zhang W, Yan X, Yang J (2014) Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature 514:486–489
Cui Z et al (2018) Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555:363–366
Dai Z, Barberán A, Li Y, Brookes PC, Xu J (2017) Bacterial community composition associated with pyrogenic organic matter (biochar) varies with pyrolysis temperature and colonization environment. mSphere 2:e00085–17
Delgadobaquerizo M, Trivedi P, Trivedi C, Eldridge DJ, Reich PB, Jeffries TC, Singh BK (2017) Microbial richness and composition independently drive soil multifunctionality. Funct Ecol 31:2330–2343
Ding X, Han X (2014) Effects of long-term fertilization on contents and distribution of microbial residues within aggregate structures of a clay soil. Biol Fert Soils 50:549–554
El-Naggar A, Hamdy A, El-Naggar SSM, Sarkar B, Chang SX, Tsang DCW, Rinklebe J, Ok YS (2019) Biochar composition-dependent impacts on soil nutrient release, carbon mineralization, and potential environmental risk: A review. J Environ Manage 241:458–467
Elzobair KA, Stromberger ME, Ippolito JA, Lentz RD (2016) Contrasting effects of biochar versus manure on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in an Aridisol. Chemosphere: Environ Toxicol Risk Assessment 142:145–152
Farag IF, Youssef NH, Elshahed MS (2017) Global distribution patterns and pangenomic diversity of the candidate phylum “Latescibacteria” (WS3). Appl Environ Microb 83:e00521-e617
Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364
Fierer N, Lauber CL, Ramirez KS, Zaneveld J, Bradford MA, Knight R (2012) Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J 6:1007–1017
Fu H, Li H, Yin P, Mei H, Li J, Zhou P, Wang Y, Ma Q, Jeyaraj A, Thangaraj K, Chen X, Li X, Guo G (2021) Integrated application of rapeseed cake and green manure enhances soil nutrients and microbial communities in tea garden soil. Sustainability 13:2–10
Geesing D, Felker P, Bingham RL (2000) Influence of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) on soil nitrogen and carbon development: Implications for global carbon sequestration. J Arid Environ 46:157–180
Gent MPN (2002) Growth and composition of salad greens as affected by organic compared to nitrate fertilizer and by environment in high tunnels. J Plant Nutr 25:981–998
Girvan MS, Bullimore J, Pretty JN, Osborn AM, Ball AS (2003) Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils. Appl Environ Microb 69:1800–1809
Glaser B, Wiedner K, Seelig S, Schmidt HP, Gerber H (2015) Biochar organic fertilizers from natural resources as substitute for mineral fertilizers. Agron Sustain Dev 35:667–678
Gomez JD, Denef K, Stewart CE, Zheng J, Cotrufo MF (2014) Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. Eur J Soil Sci 65:28–39
Gu S, Hu Q, Cheng Y, Bai L, Liu Z, Xiao W, Gong Z, Wu Y, Feng K, Deng Y, Tan L (2019) Application of organic fertilizer improves microbial community diversity and alters microbial network structure in tea (Camellia sinensis) plantation soils. Soil Till Res 195:104356
Guo K, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Chen J, Qin H (2020) Pyrolysis temperature of biochar affects ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial nutrient-use efficiency in a bamboo forest soil. Geoderma 363:114162
Han SH, An JY, Hwang J, Kim SB, Park BB (2016) The effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on the growth and nutrient concentrations of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera Lin.) in a nursery system. Forest Scie Technol 12:1–7
Kalam S, Basu A, Ahmad I, Sayyed RZ, Ni LS (2020) Recent understanding of soil acidobacteria and their ecological significance: A critical review. Front Microbiol 11:580024
Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2016) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1126–1140
Kavitha B, Reddy PVL, Kim B, Lee SS, Pandey SK, Kim KH (2018) Benefits and limitations of biochar amendment in agricultural soils: A review. J Environ Manage 227:146–154
Khodadad CLM, Zimmerman AR, Green SJ, Uthandi S, Foster JS (2011) Taxa-specific changes in soil microbial community composition induced by pyrogenic carbon amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 43:385–392
Lagerström A, Esberg C, Wardle DA, Giesler R (2009) Soil phosphorus and microbial response to a long-term wildfire chronosequence in northern sweden. Biogeochemistry 95:199–213
Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Thurber RLV, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C (2013) Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota – A review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836
Li L (2016) The influence of different site conditions and different management measures on soil ferility in woodland of Torreya grandis cv. Merrillii. Dissertation, Zhejiang A&F University (in Chinese)
Li Q, Song X, Yrjälä K, Lv J, Li Y, Wu J, Qin H (2020) Biochar mitigates the effect of nitrogen deposition on soil bacterial community composition and enzyme activities in a Torreya grandis orchard. For Ecol Manag 457:117717
Li Z, Dai W (2007) Chinese Torreya. Science Press (in Chinese)
Liang C, Zhang X, Iv KFR, Balser TC (2007) Effect of plant materials on microbial transformation of amino sugars in three soil microcosms. Biol Fert Soils 43:631–639
Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Method Enzymol 148:350–382
Liu S, Zhang Y, Zong Y, Hu Z, Wu S, Zhou J, Jin Y, Zou J (2016) Response of soil carbon dioxide fluxes, soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon to biochar amendment: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 8:392–406
Lu R (1999) Analytical methods for soils and agricultural chemistry. China agricultural science and technology press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Mahmood F, Khan I, Ashraf U, Shahzad T, Hussain S, Shahid M, Abid M, Ullah S (2017) Effects of organic and inorganic manures on maize and their residual impact on soil physico-chemical properties. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 17:22–32
Meng L, Ding W, Cai Z (2005) Long-term application of organic manure and nitrogen fertilizer on N2O emissions, soil quality and crop production in a sandy loam soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2037–2045
Morales MM, Comerford N, Guerrini IA, Falcäo N, Reeves JB (2014) Sorption and desorption of phosphate on biochar and biochar–soil mixtures. Soil Use Manage 29:306–314
Neto MS, Galdos MV, Feigl BJ, Cerri CEP, Cerri CC (2016) Direct N2O emission factors for synthetic N-fertilizer and organic residues applied on sugarcane for bioethanol production in Central-Southern Brazil. GCB Bioenergy 8:269–280
Nguyen TT, Cavagnaro TR, Ngo HTT, Marschner P (2016) Soil respiration, microbial biomass and nutrient availability in soil amended with high and low C/N residue – influence of interval between residue additions. Soil Biol Biochem 95:189–197
Palansooriya KN, Wong JTF, Hashimoto Y, Huang L, Rinklebe J, Chang SX, Bolan N, Wang H, Ok YS (2019) Response of microbial communities to biochar-amended soils: a critical review. Biochar 1:3–22
Rotaru AE, Probian C, Wilkes H, Harder J (2010) Highly enriched Betaproteobacteria growing anaerobically with p-xylene and nitrate. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:460–468
Santos EFd, Zanchim BJ, Campos AGd, Garrone RF, Junior JL (2013) Photosynthesis rate, chlorophyll content and initial development of physic nut without micronutrient fertilization. Ecology 37:334–1342
Schulz H, Glaser B (2012) Effects of biochar compared to organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth in a greenhouse experiment. J Plant Nutr Soil ScI 175:410–422
Shi P, Gao Q, Wang S, Zhang Y (2010) Effects of continuous cropping of corn and fertilization on soil microbial community functional diversity. Acta Ecol Sin 30:6173–6182 (in Chinese)
Smith P, Nkem J, Calvin K, Campbell D, Vizzarri M (2019) IPCC SRCCL Chapter 6: Interlinkages between Desertification, Land Degradation, Food Security and GHG fluxes: synergies, trade-offs and Integrated Response Options. IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems
Steinbeiss S, Gleixner G, Antonietti M (2009) Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1301–1310
Tanja M, Salzberg SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963
Thomas F, Hehemann J-H, Rebuffet E, Czjzek M, Michel G (2011) Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection. Front Microbiol 2:1–16
Trump JIV, Wrighton KC, Thrash JC, Weber KA, Coates JD (2011) Humic acid-oxidizing, nitrate-reducing bacteria in agricultural soils. mBio 2:e00044–11
Vinolas LC, Healey JR, Jones DL (2001) Kinetics of soil microbial uptake of free amino acids. Biol Fert Soils 33:67–74
Wang C, Anderson C, Suárez-Abelenda M, Wang T, Camps-Arbestain M, Ahmad R, Herath HMSK (2015) The chemical composition of native organic matter influences the response of bacterial community to input of biochar and fresh plant material. Plant Soil 395:87–104
Wang Y, Hu N, Ge T, Kuzyakov Y, Wang ZL, Li Z, Tang Z, Chen Y, Wu C, Lou Y (2017a) Soil aggregation regulates distributions of carbon, microbial community and enzyme activities after 23-year manure amendment. Appl Soil Ecol 111:65–72
Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu R, Zhang A, Yang S, Liu H, Zhou Y, Yang Z (2017b) Biochar amendment reduces paddy soil nitrogen leaching but increases net global warming potential in Ningxia irrigation, China. Sci Rep-UK 7:1–10
Wolińska A, Kuźniar A, Zielenkiewicz U, Izak D, Szafranek-Nakonieczna A, Banach A, Błaszczyk M (2017) Bacteroidetes as a sensitive biological indicator of agricultural soil usage revealed by culture-independent approach. Appl Soil Ecol 119:128–137
Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL (2018) Insight into multiple and multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental applications: A critical review. Environ Sci Technol 52:5027–5047
Xie S, Yang F, Feng H, Yu Z, Liang T (2020) Organic fertilizer reduced carbon and nitrogen in runoff and buffered soil acidification in tea plantations: evidence in nutrient contents and isotope fractionations. Sci Total Environ 762:143059
Xu HJ, Wang XH, Li H, Yao HY, Su JQ, Zhu YG (2014) Biochar impacts soil microbial community composition and nitrogen cycling in an acidic soil planted with rape. Environ Sci Technol 48:9391–9399
Yang SQ, Wang YS, Liu RL, Zhang AP, Yang ZL (2017) Effect of nitrate leaching caused by swine manure application in fields of the yellow river irrigation zone of ningxia. China Sci Rep-UK 7:13693
Ye W, Li Y, Yu W, Ye X, Qian Y, Dai W (2018) Microbial biodiversity in rhizospheric soil of Torreya grandis “Merrillii” relative to cultivation history. Chin J Appl Ecol 29:3783–3792 (in Chinese)
Ying J, Li X, Wang N, Lan Z, He J, Bai Y (2017) Contrasting effects of nitrogen forms and soil pH on ammonia oxidizing microorganisms and their responses to long-term nitrogen fertilization in a typical steppe ecosystem. Soil Bio Biochem 107:10–18
Youssef NH, Farag IF, Christian R, Hallam SJ, Woyke T, Elshahed MS (2015) In silico analysis of the metabolic potential and niche specialization of candidate phylum "Latescibacteria" (WS3). PLoS One 10:e0127499
Yu Y (1999) A milestone of wild plants protection in China-the list of wild plants protected by the nation (the first batch). Plant Mag 5:3–11 (in Chinese)
Zhang K, Chen L, Li Y, Brookes PC, Xu J, Luo Y (2017a) The effects of combinations of biochar, lime, and organic fertilizer on nitrification and nitrifiers. Biol Fert Soils 53:77–87
Zhang Q, Shamsi IH, Xu D, Wang G, Lin X, Jilani G, Hussain N, Chaudhry AN (2012) Chemical fertilizer and organic manure inputs in soil exhibit a vice versa pattern of microbial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol 57:1–8
Zhang R, Zhang Y, Song L, Song X, Hänninen H, Wu J (2017b) Biochar enhances nut quality of Torreya grandis and soil fertility under simulated nitrogen deposition. For Ecol Manag 391:321–329
Zheng Y, Han X, Li Y, Liu S, Tong Y (2020) Effects of mixed controlled release nitrogen fertilizer with rice straw biochar on rice yield and nitrogen balance in northeast China. Sci Rep-UK 10:9452
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Quan Li for providing support and guidance during manuscript preparation. We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for their linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Zhejiang Province Key R&D Project (grant number 2020C02019), Research Development Foundation of Zhejiang A & F University(2034020151), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 31800579, 32171830, 31670687 and 31971699), the Zhejiang Provincial Cooperative Forestry Science and Technology Project (grant number 2018SY06), the Zhejiang Public Welfare Project (grant number LGN20C160002), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number LQ19C160008), the Key Research Development Project of the Zhejiang Province (grant number 2018C02004), the Selective Breeding Program for New Cultivars of T. grandis (grant number 2016C02052-12), and the 111 Project (grant number D18008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhanhua Zhou: investigation, writing—original draft preparation. Kim Yrjälä: conceptualization, investigation, writing, and editing. Junhui Chen, Chenliang Yu, Wenhui Shi, Hua Qin: writing—review and editing. Yuanyuan Hu and Jiasheng Wu: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervisor. Weiwu Yu, Wensheng Dai, Jiasheng Wu: project administration.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Shahla Hosseini Bai
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Z., Yrjälä, K., Chen, J. et al. Organic amendments combined with biochar for improving soil and plant quality in a Torreya grandis plantation. J Soils Sediments 22, 1080–1094 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-03127-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-03127-2