Abstract
Purpose
Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Titration is a necessary component of proper fitting of MADs, yet little is known about what happens at each step of the titration. The objectives of this study were to determine the clinical and paraclinical evolution of OSA at every mm of MAD advancement.
Methods
Volunteers were fitted with MADs set to 50% of maximum advancement. MAD clinical and paraclinical results were recorded at every additional mm-titration, including apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), as well as symptoms of sleepiness and fatigue.
Results
In 20 volunteers with OSA, the MAD had a significant effect on every polygraphic parameter at the onset of use. The mean AHI with MAD fell by 15.2/h (p < 0.001). The mean Epworth Sleepiness Score and Pichot Fatigue questionnaire with MAD fell by 2.0 (p = 0.0687) and 2.4 (p = 0.1073) respectively. There was no proportionality between clinical gains (drowsiness and fatigue) and AHI improvements.
Conclusions
MADs led to a significant improvement in AHI and other polygraphic parameters from the onset of use. The decrease of clinical symptoms (drowsiness and fatigue) was more complex to interpret because of the small decreases observed. The absence of concordance between AHI improvement and clinical symptoms was nevertheless objectively quantified and symptoms were alleviated with advancements. The findings suggest that it may be appropriate to use clinical symptoms as a main aim of titration, since the improvement in AHI is reached at the onset of MAD use.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is defined by intermittent collapse of the upper airway during sleep, leading to oxygen desaturation and/or sleep disturbances. Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) present a viable therapeutic alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. While the exact mechanisms through which MADs function remain somewhat ambiguous and multifactorial, research indicates that MADs enlarge the upper airway space [7,8,9,10] and enhance the reflex dilation of the pharynx, optimizing the performance of stretch receptors in the genioglossus muscle [9, 11].
In France, MADs are considered a second-line treatment for severe OSA when CPAP is declined or discontinued [12]. They are the first-line treatment for moderate OSA with three or more clinical symptoms, such as headaches, fatigue, daytime drowsiness, nycturia, nocturnal choking, vascular comorbidities, or traffic accidents due to sleepiness [12]. The fine tuning of MADs is flexible, allowing specialists like ear, nose, throat (ENT) doctors or dentists to adjust the appliance by progressively moving the mandible forward until symptoms show notable improvement [4, 5]. Our previous study [6] revealed that, on average, 2.0 ± 1.4 consultations are required for titration, ranging from 0 to 7. Subsequent to these adjustments, a sleep study is undertaken to ensure that the apnea hypopnea Iindex (AHI) has sufficiently decreased [12].
The following question remains unanswered: Does AHI or symptom severity change linearly with adjustments, or is there a certain point after which MAD efficacy plateaus or varies non-linearly?
The main purpose of this study was to map the clinical and paraclinical progression of OSA for every millimeter of MAD advancement.
Methods
Study participants
Between September 21, 2021, and March 7, 2023, volunteer patients who were equipped with a MAD were prospectively included. Inclusion criteria for MAD were (1) severe OSA (AHI > 30/h) with clinical symptoms such as headaches, fatigue, drowsiness, nocturia, nocturnal suffocations, vascular comorbidities, road accidents from falling asleep, and refusal or intolerance to CPAP or (2) moderate OSA (AHI between 15/h and 30/h) with the above-mentioned clinical symptoms.
Patients were referred to the ENT doctor directly by general practitioners to perform a sleep study or by specialists such as pulmonologists, neurologists, or cardiologists after completion of a sleep study. Sleep studies were interpreted using the criteria established by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine [13].
MAD provision
Specifics on the prescription, contra-indications, and dental impressions have been detailed in a previous study [6]. The MAD utilized in this research was the Narval CC® titratable twin-block retention MAD, manufactured by ResMed (Saint-Priest, France). The same ENT doctor (author GB) dispensed the MAD to the patients. A multiparametric (subjective and objective) titration method [14] was performed as described: Initially, the MAD advancement was set at 50% of its maximum. Thereafter, at each 2–4-week-consultation, the MAD was advanced by increments of 1 mm until symptom improvement was observed. In parallel, patients underwent clinical symptom evaluations and polygraphy assessments by a specialized nurse, the day before titration consultations. The ENT specialist remained blinded to the polygraphy results during titration. After observing clinical improvement, patients underwent a concluding sleep study at the original location and under the same sleep expert as their initial assessment. The ENT relayed these findings to the patients and scheduled follow-up visits every 6 months in the first year and annually thereafter [6].
Research objectives
The primary objective was to explore AHI response to each millimeter of MAD advancement. Secondary objectives focused on the trajectories of other polygraphic metrics and the subjective experiences of sleepiness and fatigue corresponding to each millimeter of advancement.
Outcome metrics
Evaluations (polygraphy, questionnaires) were performed at every mm of titration. The clinical evaluator who was performing the titration (author GB) was not aware of the results of these evaluations. The necessity of an additional advancement was therefore judged according to subjective impressions of the patients of the efficacy of the MAD.
The principal outcome was the AHI for each millimeter of MAD advancement. Secondary outcome measures included:
-
Polygraphic metrics: apnea index (AI), hypopnea index (HI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), lowest oxygen saturation (LOS), and time below 90% saturation (T90)
-
Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs): the Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) [15] and the Pichot Fatigue Questionnaire [16]
Data analysis
Means of polygraphic metrics were compared using Student’s t-tests and PROMs with ANOVA. Comparisons were made at each point with the previous point.
All data analysis was performed using the R software.
Results
Patient population
Between September 21, 2021, and March 7, 2023, twenty patients were provided with a MAD. Their demographic and clinical details are tabulated in Table 1. Ultimately, comprehensive data from 18 patients was analyzed as one patient withdrew her consent and one did not tolerate the MAD and was given CPAP therapy.
MAD overall efficacy
On average, AHI was reduced by 15.2 event/h (p < 0.001), ESS was reduced by 2.0 points (p = 0.0687) and the Pichot Fatigue Score (PFS) was decreased by 2.4 points (p = 0.1073).
Granular efficacy of the mandibular advancement device (per millimeter)
Detailed outcomes for both the primary and secondary metrics are provided in Table 2.
AHI evolution
Figures 1, 2, and 3 depict the trajectories of AHI, Epworth Sleepiness Score, and Pichot Fatigue Score in relation to titration increments, respectively. Individual patient trends for these parameters are shown in Figs. 4, 5, and 6. As illustrated in Fig. 4, the AHI reduction begins immediately upon MAD onset. Further analysis (Fig. 4 B and C) suggests a proportional relationship between MAD advancement and AHI reductions, with some minor fluctuations in AHI even noticed with advanced titrations, likely attributable to sampling variability and interpretative discrepancies.
Clinical symptom evolution
The clinical manifestations did not consistently align with the AHI trends. In Figs. 5B and 6B, the reductions in drowsiness and fatigue were not strictly proportional to AHI improvements. Figs. 5C, 5D, 6C, and 6D demonstrate an inconsistent correlation between MAD advancements and clinical signs of OSA, as determined by Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Notably, specific patient profiles (e.g., patients #5 and #1 in Figs. 5C and 5D respectively; patients #5 and 16 in Figs. 6C and 6D) revealed a tipping point in symptom progression. This suggests that, up to a certain threshold, MAD effects were minimal, but beyond this point, their efficacy markedly increased.
Discussion
Regarding therapy efficacy, our results from sleep tests—including AHI, oxygen desaturation index, lowest oxygen saturation, and time below 90% saturation—corroborated findings from previous studies [5, 6, 17]. Our study showed that the introduction of MAD significantly influenced all polygraphic parameters (as depicted in Table 1 and 2). While MAD efficacy on AHI did rise with additional advancements, the increase was statistically insignificant (see Fig. 1). Furthermore, MAD’s influence on the Epworth Scale Score, and the Pichot Fatigue Score was negligible (Table 1). Interestingly, there was no correlation between the paraclinical effects of MAD, which were significant, and the clinical effect, which was reduced and non-significant. For context, in the study of 369 patients by Vecchierini et al. [5], the Epworth Scale Score decreased from 11.2 ± 4.8 initially to 7.8 ± 4.3 with MAD treatment (p < 10−4). Similarly, the Pichot score decreased substantially from 14.1 ± 7.8 to 9.0 ± 7.2 (p < 10−4). In our cohort of 20 patients, though the trends mirrored those of Vecchierini et al. [5], the results were non-significant during MAD therapy, (p = 0.1073)—possibly pointing to the limited power of our study. No proportionality—either absolute or relative—was observed between mandibular advancement and improvement in clinical symtoms. Profiles of drowsiness and fatigue evolution with breaks (patients #5, 1, and 16) were probably due to the dilation reflex of the mandibular advancement device as previously observed in studies [9, 11].
Overall adherence to MAD therapy was good. Patients demonstrated high tolerance towards MADs. Only a single participant found it intolerable, aligning with existing literature [5, 18]. Our observed adherence rates appeared to be better than those documented in CPAP follow-up studies [19, 20] or in studies comparing CPAP and MAD [21,22,23].
Although success metrics for MAD in OSA are still being debated, they predominantly revolve around AHI metrics. A partial response can be defined as a > 50%–AHI reduction after MAD [24]. A complete response can be defined as a residual AHI ≤ 5/h [25,26,27,28]. Success can be defined as a > 50% AHI reduction and/or a residual AHI < 10/h [4, 18, 25, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Current research suggests the onset of MAD use brings about the most considerable effect on AHI, rendering subsequent titrations less important. This fact may call into question the utility of the current titration methods. On the contrary, if the primary objective of a mandibular advancement device treatment centers around clinical symptoms such as drowsiness and fatigue, our data imply that the significance of titration should be directed aimprt symptoms, even if our results were not statistically significant.
One of the main limitation of our study was its limited patient sample size. However, monthly polygraphic recording present considerable challenges, making large-scale studies, like the ORCADES study [5], difficult to perform. The average age in our cohort (60.8 ± 12.8 years) was noticeably higher than in Vecchierini et al. [5] (52.6 ± 11.3). This may be explained by the added constraints on participants (1 or 2 additional sleep recordings), which favored retirees and explained the withdrawal of consent of one patient. For active patients, a 5-min teleconsultation can be remotely performed [35] to assess Epworth Sleepiness Score and Pichot Fatigue Score.
There is no consensus on the definition of success/failure of MAD. For Aarab et al. [34], a failure is defined by a residual AHI > 10/hr and less than 50% AHI improvement. For other authors [25, 26, 28, 30], a complete response is defined by a residual AHI < 5/hr; a partial response by symptomatic improvement and an AHI reduction > 50% but residual AHI > 5/hr; and a failure by the persistence of symptoms and/or reduction in AHI < 50%. For Dieltjens [14], Hoffstein [18], Doff [29], and Vanderveken [20], a response is defined by an AHI reduction > 50% and a success by the reduction > 50% and a residual AHI < 5 or 10/hr. The European Respiratory Society Task Force [24] defined success as a residual AHI < 10/hr and a partial response as a reduced AHI > 50% with a residual AHI > 10 or 20 with or without symptoms. Is it relevant to base the MAD success on AHI or on clinical parameters?
Conclusion
In this study, MAD therapy led to a significant improvement in AHI and other polygraphic parameters from the onset of use. While the symptom reduction (specifically, drowsiness and fatigue) was apparent, its interpretation was more complex because of the small, non-significant decrease in PROMs, likely due to the study’s limited sample size and a potential threshold of MAD’s clinical efficacy. Nonetheless, the findings of the study suggest that the primary focus of titration should be clinical symptoms, given that the significant AHI improvements occurred at the onset of MAD use. The absence of concordance between AHI reduction and clinical symptoms was objectively quantified in this study, and symptoms such as sleepiness and fatigue may be improved with further mandibular advancement.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Li W, Xiao L, Hu J (2013) The comparison of CPAP and mandibular advancement devices in treatment of patients with OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Care 58:1184–1195
Lim J, Lasserson TJ, Fleetham J, Wright J (2006) Mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD004435
Randerath WJ, Verbraecken J, Andreas S, Bettega G, Boudewyns A, Hamans E et al (2011) Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnea. Eur Respir J 37:1000–1028
Vecchierini MF, Leger D, Laaban JP, Putterman G, Figueredo M, Levy J et al (2008) Efficacy and compliance of mandibular repositioning device in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome under a patient-driven protocol of care. Sleep Med 9:762–769
Vecchierini MF, Attali V, Collet JM, d’Ortho MP, El Chater P, Kerbrat JB et al (2016) A custom-made mandibular repositioning device for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome: the ORCADES study. Sleep Med 19:131–140
Buiret G, Bechara M, Plouin-Gaudon I, Bavozet F, Dancea O, Pujo K et al (2021) Predictive Factors for efficacious oral appliance therapy in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea patient. Laryngoscope 131:E2089–E2096
Ferguson KA, Cartwright R, Rogers R, Schmidt-Nowara W (2006) Mandibular advancement devices for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep 29:244–262
Clark GT, Sohn JW, Hong CN (2000) Treating obstructive sleep apnea and snoring: assessment of an anterior mandibular positioning device. J Am Dent Assoc 131:765–771
Ng AT, Gotsopoulos H, Qian J, Cistulli PA (2003) Effect of mandibular advancement device therapy on upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:238–241
Serra-Torres S, Bellot-Arcis C, Montiel-Company JM, Marco-Algarra J, Almerich-Silla JM (2016) Effectiveness of mandibular advancement appliances in treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A systematic review. Laryngoscope 126:507–514
Almeida FR, Tsuiki S, Hattori Y, Takei Y, Inoue Y, Lowe AA (2011) Dose-dependent effects of mandibular protrusion on genioglossus activity in sleep apnea. Eur Respir J 37:209–212
Santé HAd. Comment prescrire les dispositifs médicaux de traitement du syndrome d’apnées hypopnées obstructives du sommeil chez l’adulte. 2014; Available from: https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/uplMADd/docs/application/pdf/2014-11/sahos_-_fiche_de_bon_usage.pdf
Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, Kuhlmann DC, Mehra R, Ramar K et al (2017) Clinical practice guideline for diagnostic testing for adult obstructive sleep apnea: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Sleep Med : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 13:479–504
Dieltjens M, Vanderveken OM, Heyning PH, Braem MJ (2012) Current opinions and clinical practice in the titration of mandibular advancement devices in the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Med Rev 16:177–185
Johns MW (1991) A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 14:540–545
Pichot P (1984) Brun JP [Brief self-evaluation questionnaire for depressive, asthenic and anxious dimensions]. Ann Med Psychol 142:862–865
Buiret G (2022) [Mandibular advancement devices in patients with severe OSAHS]. Rev Mal Respir
Hoffstein V (2007) Review of mandibular advancement devices for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep Breath Schlaf Atmung 11:1–22
Sawyer AM, Gooneratne NS, Marcus CL, Ofer D, Richards KC, Weaver TE (2011) A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions. Sleep Med Rev 15:343–356
Engleman HM, Wild MR (2003) Improving CPAP use by patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS). Sleep Med Rev 7:81–99
Barnes M, McEvoy RD, Banks S, Tarquinio N, Murray CG, Vowles N et al (2004) Efficacy of positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement device in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170:656–664
Lam B, Sam K, Mok WY, Cheung MT, Fong DY, Lam JC et al (2007) Randomised study of three non-surgical treatments in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Thorax 62:354–359
Randerath WJ, Heise M, Hinz R, Ruehle KH (2002) An individually adjustable mandibular advancement device vs continuous positive airway pressure in mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 122:569–575
Marklund M, Verbraecken J, Randerath W (2012) Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnea: mandibular advancement device therapy. Eur Respir J 39:1241–1247
Deane SA, Cistulli PA, Ng AT, Zeng B, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA (2009) Comparison of mandibular advancement splint and tongue stabilizing device in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. Sleep 32:648–653
Mehta A, Qian J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2001) A randomized, controlled study of a mandibular advancement splint for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:1457–1461
Vanderveken OM, Devolder A, Marklund M, Boudewyns AN, Braem MJ, Okkerse W et al (2008) Comparison of a custom-made and a thermoplastic mandibular advancement device for the treatment of mild sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178:197–202
Gotsopoulos H, Chen C, Qian J, Cistulli PA (2002) Mandibular advancement device therapy improves symptoms in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:743–748
Doff MH, Hoekema A, Wijkstra PJ, van der Hoeven JH, Huddleston Slater JJ, de Bont LG et al (2013) Mandibular advancement device versus continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a 2-year follow-up. Sleep 36:1289–1296
Hamoda MM, Kohzuka Y, Almeida FR (2018) Mandibular advancement devices for the Management of OSA: An Updated Review of the Literature. Chest 153:544–553
Dieltjens M, Vanderveken OM, Hamans E, Verbraecken JA, Wouters K, Willemen M et al (2013) Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea using a custom-made titratable duobloc mandibular advancement device: a prospective clinical study. Sleep Breath Schlaf Atmung 17:565–72
Ahrens A, McGrath C, Hagg U (2010) Subjective efficacy of mandibular advancement device design features in the management of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American BMADrd of Orthodontics 138:559–576
Ahrens A, McGrath C, Hagg U (2011) A systematic review of the efficacy of mandibular advancement device design in the management of obstructive sleep apnea. Eur J Orthod 33:318–324
Aarab G, Lobbezoo F, Heymans MW, Hamburger HL, Naeije M (2011) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of mandibular advancement device therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Respir Int Rev Thoracic Dis 82:162–168
Vincent P, Haw G (2022) Buiret G [Patient satisfaction after mandibular orthosis fitting by teleconsultation]. Rev Mal Respir 39:8–12
Acknowledgements
Medical writing assistance was provided by Vanessa Di Cataldo, medical writer, funded by ResMed
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study procedures and analyses were undertaken by GB principal investigator. The first draft of the manuscript was prepared by GB. The manuscript was reviewed and edited by all the authors. All authors made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Our study adhered to ethical standards set by the institutional/national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration (with later amendments). The research received approval from the French national review board (CPP Ile de France X #2021-A01466-35) on August 31, 2021, and is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05056766).
Informed consent
Informed consent was signed by every patient.
Competing interests
GB has received an unrestricted research funding from ResMed for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, N., Buiret, G. Effects of mandibular advancement devices on the evolution of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 28, 1127–1135 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-023-02988-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-023-02988-w