Erratum to: Water Air Soil Pollut

DOI 10.1007/s11270-009-0120-y

The original publication of this article (doi:10.1007/s11270-009-0120-y) unfortunately contained errors.

Table 2. Values for K, Fe, and Mn are all an order of magnitude too high. The values have been decreased by a factor of ten, and rounded to under four significant figures.

Table 2 Mean biomass and total nutrient uptake across treatments
Full size table

Figure 2. Aboveground Fe concentrations are actually two orders of magnitude higher than shown in the original figure. For the sake of simplicity, all units have been changed to mg/L and the height of the bars reduced in the aboveground treatment to reflect this change. The lowercase letters elucidating treatment differences in shoot tissue were not included in the updated graph, as there was no treatment effect.

Fig. 2
figure 1

Fe tissue concentrations

Full size image

Figure 3. Mn concentrations are actually two orders of magnitude higher than shown. The units have been changed to mg/L and the scale on the Y-axis has been decreased by an order of magnitude.

Fig. 3
figure 2

Mn tissue concentrations

Full size image

The following text should be removed: Discussion, page 81, column 2, paragraph 2, sentence 3 (running from lines 22–25 of right column). “Root Fe concentrations in Chen et al., (2005) were, however, more than an order of magnitude higher than those in the present study.”

The corrected Table 2, Fig. 2, and Fig. 3 are reproduced in the next page.