1 Introduction

In general, when two flat surfaces start a sliding contact, they undergo a transient process that leads to the increase in their real area of contact. Such increase is due to the progressive wear of the two mating bodies. In particular, the sharp asperities of each surface are flattened leading to a smoother and more uniform sliding contact [1]. This phenomenon is known as running-in. As noted by Blau et al. [2], in some cases additional wear processes can play an important role in the running-in stage; the accumulation of wear debris and the related material transfer phenomena from one surface to the other may change the contact conditions and the chemical and micro-mechanical properties of the friction layers at the interface of the mating materials. This situation is particularly important in vehicular braking systems, made of friction linings, involving a pair of brake pads, sliding against a counterface disc [3, 4]. In this case, the running-in can be regarded as the period necessary to form a uniform friction layer capable to provide the proper friction coefficient and, thereby, braking torque. The main components of the friction layer are the so-called primary and secondary plateaus [3, 4]. Primary plateaus are made of hard and tough constituents, like metallic fibres and/or relatively large ceramic particles [3,4,5,6]. The secondary plateaus are formed by the piling up of wear debris, originating from the wearing out of both the friction material and the counterface disc, against the primary plateaus [7,8,9]. Generally speaking, the compactness and the stability of the friction layers determine the stability of the friction coefficient and also the achievement of an adequately low wear rate [7,8,9].

Several investigations focused on the study of the evolution of the surface topography during the running-in stage and on the prediction of the relevant wear rate of the mating bodies through mathematical models [10,11,12,13,14]. Zheng et al. [14], for example, studied the friction and wear behaviour of a spark-ignited engine, during the running-in period, by applying the mathematical model proposed by Schneider et al. [15]. Their model describes a first-order exponential decrease in the wear rate as a function of the sliding time. They noted that the wear rate, W, went through a maximum at the beginning of the sliding run and then it progressively decreased towards a constant, steady-state value (W):

$$W = A_{1} e^{{ - \frac{t}{{t_{1} }}}} + W_{\infty } ,$$
(1)

where A1 is the difference between the wear rate at the beginning of the sliding, t = 0, and the steady-state wear rate, being t1 the time constant of the model.

In a previous study [16], the application of some cermet coatings onto the disc surfaces, via the high-velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) process, evidenced the role of the surface roughness and skewness on the frictional and wear performances of a pin-disc system. To the authors’ knowledge, the study of the running-in of the disc-pad system has been little investigated in the literature so far, especially as concerns this newly developed coated braking discs. This study, based on pin-on-disc (PoD) tests, aims at investigating the tribological mechanisms active during the running-in stage. Although PoD is not reproducing real braking conditions, it is an excellent tool for verifying preliminarily materials properties. These laboratory-scale tests provide fundamental indications in view of the complete assessment, in real braking systems, of the tested materials. The further simulating tests, used to complete the development of the best brake materials, could be performed by using specific dyno bench tests with full-size discs and real pads and, eventually, car tests conducted according to certified driving cycles.

2 Materials and Experimental Procedures

The sliding tests were carried out using an Eyre/Biceri PoD test rig. The discs had a diameter of 63 mm and were machined from a real grey cast iron brake disc with a pearlitic microstructure [17, 18]. After machining, the discs were coated by means of an industrial HVOF deposition apparatus. Two different feedstock composite powders were used. The first one was a commercial WC–CoCr powder with a nominal composition of 86 wt% WC in a 10 wt% Co 4 wt% Cr matrix. The second powder, employed in the HVOF deposition, was a commercial Cr3C2–NiCr powder containing 75 wt% Cr3C2 particles embedded in a 25 wt% NiCr matrix. The WC–CoCr powder was produced by agglomeration and sintering, while the Cr3C2–NiCr one was obtained by sintering and plasma densification. The average particle-size distribution of the WC–CoCr powder was in the range 10–25 µm. The Cr3C2–NiCr powder had a higher average particle-size which was between 10 and 45 µm. Several studies [19,20,21,22] confirm the superior room temperature wear resistance of the WC–CoCr coatings with respect to the Cr3C2–NiCr ones but, on the other hand, chromium carbide coatings exhibit better properties at higher temperatures [23, 24]. For these reasons, a comparative study on these two coating systems has been carried out.

The spray parameters were extensively studied in previous researches [19, 20]. In the present study, typical parameters for the deposition of the cermet coatings via HVOF were adopted. The kerosene and the oxygen flow rates were about 24 L/h and 950 L/min, and a spray distance of about 380 mm was selected. In order to improve the adhesion and the coating properties, the discs were preheated using a plasma torch.

The main characteristics of the coatings are summarized in Table 1. The microhardness measurements were made on the coating cross sections using a Vickers indenter under a load of 300 g. The small dimensions of the hardness marks (10 µm diagonal approx.), with respect to the coating thickness (roughly 70 µm), ensured that the hardness of the coating is not affected by the grey cast iron substrate. The Cr3C2–NiCr coating is characterized by a lower microhardness and a higher surface roughness Ra, determined using a standard stylus profilometer [21, 22]. This coating feature is consistent with the coarser particle size of the Cr3C2–NiCr starting powder. Following the indications of a previous investigation [16], it was also decided to submit the coatings to an optimized surface polishing treatment, in order to obtain an average surface roughness (Ra) of 1 µm.

Table 1 Main characteristics of the HVOF cermet coatings

The polishing procedure is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Polishing procedure of the coated discs [16]

The skewness parameter (Rsk), described in the ISO 4287-1997 standard, was calculated by using Eq. (2). The data are included in Table 1.

$$R_{\text{sk}} = \frac{1}{{R_{q}^{3} }} \frac{1}{n} \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {y_{i} - \bar{y}} \right)^{3} ,$$
(2)

where R q is the root-mean-square roughness, y i is the height of the ith point, and \(\bar{y}\) is the mean of y.

According to the ISO 4287-1997 standard, if Rsk = 0 the surface is symmetrical, as concerns peaks and valley, with respect to the average line. In this case, the distribution of the heights can be either normal or Gaussian. Furthermore, a positive value of Rsk indicates the prevailing presence of peaks on the surface, while a negative value of Rsk is representative of a larger fraction of valleys. In the as-sprayed condition, Rsk is slightly positive in agreement with published data [25,26,27,28]. After polishing, it becomes negative, because of the flattening of the highest asperities. As a consequence of this flattening, the load-bearing area of the coated discs increases [16, 25,26,27,28]. This polishing procedure led to a decrease in the coating thickness from about 70 µm in the as-sprayed conditions to the 50–60 µm after polishing.

As mentioned, the surface parameters were measured with a stylus profilometer, the scanned length being equal to 15 mm in the region outside the wear tracks and 6 mm for tests conducted within the wear tracks. In order to get rid of systematic errors due to the change in the scanning velocity, this was set to 0.15 mm/s for all the measurements. To ensure a statistical relevance, five measurements were performed for each condition.

The pins were made of a commercial low-metallic friction material, and they were machined from a real brake pad. Several constituents are there in the friction material, listed and classified according to the relevant functional categories [29, 30] in Table 3. In Fig. 1, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograph shows the microstructure of the friction material, with some constituents identified and labelled by means of energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) analyses. The pins had cylindrical shapes with a diameter and a height of 6 and 10 mm, respectively. The flat end of each pin was in conformal contact with the rotating surface of the coated disc during the PoD test. The parallelism of the pin-on-disc arm was checked before and after each test in order to ensure the perpendicularity between the pin and the disc and to avoid errors due to their misalignment.

Table 3 Main components of the low-metallic friction material investigated in the present study [30]
Fig. 1
figure 1

SEM micrograph of a friction material cross section with the indication of the main constituents

The PoD tests were carried out at a sliding velocity of 1.57 m/s (v) at room temperature. The nominal contact pressure was equal to 1 MPa [6, 16, 18, 31]. In order to evaluate the wear volumes of the pins during the running-in stage, the tests were interrupted every 2 min until the steady-state wear rate had been reached (interrupted tests). The mass loss of the pins was evaluated at each interruption by means of an analytical balance with a precision of 10−4 g. The wear volumes, V, were then calculated by dividing the weight loss by the density of the pins (2.8 g/cm3). The wear rate, W, was calculated as:

$$W = \frac{V}{s},$$
(3)

being s the sliding distance. The specific wear coefficients, Ka, were also calculated, using the following expression:

$$K_{\text{a}} = \frac{W}{F},$$
(4)

where F is the applied load. The average friction coefficients, evaluated for each time interval, were also continuously recorded during the tests. Tests without any stop were also carried out for a comparison, and correspondingly, the continuous evolution of the friction coefficient was recorded (continuous tests). The coatings and the worn surfaces of the pins were analysed with a JEOL IT300 scanning electron microscope, equipped with an energy-dispersive spectroscopy system, in order to characterize the wear tracks and their surface topography.

3 Results

3.1 Wear Behaviour

Figure 2 depicts the recorded evolution of the pin wear volumes as a function of the sliding time, for the discs in the as-sprayed (a) and polished (b) conditions.

Figure 2a shows that the initial wear volume for the Cr3C2–NiCr coating is higher than the one of the WC–CoCr coating. This is related to the difference in the surface roughness in the as-sprayed conditions (Table 1), that is, larger for the first coating, Ra ≈ 5 µm, with respect to the second one, Ra ≈ 3 µm. However, due to the lower microhardness of the Cr3C2–NiCr coating, the wear volume of the pin after 6 min of sliding reaches a steady condition. The higher microhardness of the WC–CoCr coating resulted in a continuous increase in the wear volume of the pin, with a prolonged running-in stage lasting for about 34 min. Analysing the curves in Fig. 2b, referring to surface-polished coatings, it is possible to note that both the initial wear volume and the increasing trend of the curves are almost the same for the Cr3C2–NiCr and WC–CoCr coatings.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Wear volume of pins as a function of the sliding time for a discs in the as-sprayed conditions and b discs with an average roughness of 1 µm, obtained by surface polishing. Please note the completely different range for the y-axes

The wear volumes were used to calculate the wear rates, W, whose values are shown in Fig. 3. The experimental points were then fitted using Eq. 1, the relevant model parameters being listed in Table 4. First of all, it can be observed that the experimental fit is particularly good in the case of the as-sprayed samples (with adjusted R2 values very close to unity), whereas in the case of the polished specimens the quality of the fit was lower. This is due to the scatter of results of Fig. 3b, which is to be ascribed to the difficulties in the weighting operations when dealing with a very little amount of debris. It can be further noted that the steady-state wear rates (W) are always lower for the Cr3C2–NiCr coatings and decrease by one to two orders of magnitude after the polishing treatment.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Wear rate of pins as a function of the sliding time for a discs in the as-sprayed conditions and b discs with an average roughness of 1 µm. Data points are fitted by the continuous lines given by Eq. 1 (see main text)

Table 4 Fitting parameters of the wear curves in Fig. 3
  • A1 is the difference between the wear rate at the beginning of the sliding, t = 0, and the steady-state wear rate (W);

  • t1 is the time constant of the model.

Since the wear tracks on the coated discs could not be detected with the stylus profilometer, the wear of the discs was assumed to be negligible in comparison with the wear of the pins. The W values in Table 4 are consistent with the data reported in a previous investigation [31]. As a reference, the steady-state wear rates of the pin and the grey cast iron (uncoated) disc, sliding against each other under the same conditions used in the present study, were equal to W = 1.60 10−3 and 7.8 10−4 mm3/m, respectively. From the values in Table 4, it can be concluded that the polished coatings provided a reduction in the overall wear of the pin-disc systems with respect to the uncoated disc condition, investigated in a former study [31].

3.2 Frictional Behaviour

Figure 4a, b shows the average friction coefficients, obtained for each time step used for the wear volume and wear rate quantifications. For comparison, Fig. 4c, d shows the evolution of the friction coefficient in the case of the continuous tests.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a, b Average friction coefficient in the case of the interrupted tests; c, d plots of the friction coefficient evolution during the continuous tests

From Fig. 4a, b, it is possible to note that the friction coefficient for the as-sprayed coatings is on average lower than that for the polished coatings. This aspect is more evident in the continuous wear tests (Fig. 4c, d). In these tests, the friction coefficient of the as-sprayed coatings is slightly higher than for the interrupted tests on the same samples. For the polished coatings, the friction coefficient is much higher, and it continuously increases during the tests reaching a value of about 0.6 after 25 min. Almost the same value of the steady-state friction coefficient, i.e., 0.6, was found during the PoD tests conducted using with traditional grey cast iron (uncoated) disc sliding against the same friction material [31].

3.3 Evolution of Surface Roughness and Wear Damage

In Table 1, the initial surface roughness, Ra, and the skewness, Rsk, of the unworn coatings are listed. These parameters were also measured at the end of the interrupted as well as the continuous tests. The results are listed in Table 5 and plotted in Fig. 5.

Table 5 Ra and Rsk surface parameters measured after the interrupted and continuous tests
Fig. 5
figure 5

Evolution of surface average roughness and, among brackets, roughness skewness parameter during PoD wear tests. Two sets of data are plotted: interrupted (a) and continuous (b) tests

The plots in Fig. 5 clearly show the progressive decrease in the average surface roughness and in the skewness as the sliding action proceeds, for both the as-sprayed and the polished coatings. The controlled polishing procedure resulted in a lower Ra values and, most importantly, a more negatively skewed surface profile that further decreased during sliding. The lowest skewness values were achieved with the polished discs. This is in agreement with the fact that more negative values of roughness skewness are consistent with wider load-bearing regions and to a more uniform contact with respect to the as-sprayed coatings.

The worn out surface of friction materials is typically characterized by the presence of friction layers, made by primary and secondary plateaus [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Figure 6 shows such plateaus observed on the pin surfaces after sliding against the Cr3C2–NiCr-coated discs. The micrographs refer to the pins used both for the interrupted and the continuous tests. The letter (a) indicates a typical primary plateau, whereas the letter (b) a typical secondary plateau. The EDXS analysis showed that primary plateaus are mainly constituted by steel fibres and that the secondary plateaus contain all the main ingredients of the friction material, with only a minor contribution from the disc coating.

Fig. 6
figure 6

SEM images of the worn surfaces of the pins after sliding against the Cr3C2–NiCr coatings in the as-sprayed and polished conditions and in the case of the interrupted and continuous tests. The values of the relevant coating skewness, Rsk, are indicated (see also Table 4). a Primary plateau and b secondary plateau (see main text for full explanation)

Figure 7 shows the SEM micrographs of the wear tracks on the coated discs. As already observed [16], the wear debris coming from the wear of the pins accumulated and compacted into the unpolished “valleys” of the polished coatings. The amount of material transferred from the pin onto the disc surface increases with its roughness, and the micrographs of as-sprayed coatings clearly show this trend.

Fig. 7
figure 7

SEM images of the wear tracks on the disc surfaces after run-in the Cr3C2–NiCr coating in the as-sprayed and polished conditions, after the interrupted and continuous tests. The roughnesses refer to the average surface roughness, Ra, detected before and after the PoD tests

In order to confirm that during the sliding contact the coatings did not wear significantly, EDXS elemental analyses and maps were acquired on the wear tracks of the polished coatings continuously tested. Since the polishing procedure leads to a decrease in the coating thicknesses, only the polished coatings were analysed. The results of these analyses are shown in Fig. 8 and Table 6.

Fig. 8
figure 8

EDXS elemental maps for the polished coatings continuously tested

Table 6 EDXS quantitative analysis of the polished coatings continuously tested

The results of the EDXS quantitative analysis are listed in Table 6.

4 Discussion

4.1 Wear Behaviour

In general, the stability and the area of the secondary plateaus, resulting from the compaction of the wear debris against the reinforcing metal fibres, are strongly related to the surface topography of the disc counterface [16, 32, 33]. In a previous investigation [16], we observed that the asperities of the hard as-sprayed coatings induce the severe abrasive wear of the friction material and correspondingly the reduction in the friction coefficient. After polishing, to reduce the initial roughness, the abrasive effect exerted by the asperities is lower, leading to a mild wear of the friction material and to a higher friction coefficient [31]. In the present study, we have extended the former investigation [31] to the running-in stage of the PoD tests.

As shown by Fig. 7, in the as-sprayed coatings the high initial roughness induces a significant transfer phenomenon that occurs from the beginning of the tests. This explains the high initial wear rates of the as-sprayed coatings, as shown by Fig. 1a and evidenced by the A1 values listed in Table 4. In Fig. 9, the almost linear relationship between the A1 values and the initial roughness, expressed by the Ra values, is highlighted. As already mentioned, A1 is an indicator of the wear rate during the first minutes of sliding contact; higher values of A1 are related to higher initial wear rates of the friction material.

Fig. 9
figure 9

A1 as a function of the initial roughness (Ra) of the discs

As can be noted from the SEM observations of the pin worn surfaces (Fig. 6), the area of the friction layer decreases as the surface skewness becomes more negative. This phenomenon is strictly related to the increase in the load-bearing area that reduces the abrasive contribution of the asperities, initially present on the unpolished coating surface. Upon reducing the wearing of the friction material, the amount of wear debris decreases, leading to the formation of more compacted and adherent secondary plateaus. The same mechanism is valid for the transfer layer built up on the disc surfaces; the wear debris accumulated into the unpolished valleys of the coatings is more compacted in the case of low skewness values. The EDXS elemental maps in Fig. 8 clearly show the accumulation and the compaction of the wear debris inside the unpolished valleys of the coatings. Furthermore, the joint presence of copper and iron within the same areas and in similar ratios for the two coatings (Table 6) is a further proof that the detected iron comes from the friction material (pin). As a further indication, the EDXS quantitative analysis revealed a comparatively low amount of iron on the wear tracks. This low amount can be ascribed to the transfer from the pin materials rather than to the exposition of the grey cast iron substrate.

Figure 10 shows the relationship between the steady-state wear rate of the pins (W) and the skewness at the end of the interrupted running-in tests. Coherently with the results above, the increase in the load-bearing area, due to the decrease in the skewness, leads to a more efficient compaction of the wear debris inside the unpolished valleys of the coatings and thereby to lower wear rates.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Steady-state wear rate of the pin (W) as a function of the skewness at the end of the interrupted tests

4.2 Friction Behaviour

The friction coefficient of two mating surfaces under dry sliding conditions is given by two different contributions [34]:

$$\mu \, = \, \mu_{\text{abr}} + \, \mu_{\text{ad}} ,$$

where µabr and µad are the abrasive and the adhesive contributions, respectively. Using the Rabinowicz’s model [35], it turns out that the abrasive contribution (µabr) due to the surface roughness does not generally exceed 0.2. This explains why low friction coefficients were exhibited by the as-sprayed coatings. In fact, in this case the friction coefficient is mainly determined by the abrasive interaction of the hard asperities. Furthermore, the trend of the friction coefficient during the continuous tests of the as-sprayed coatings does not show the rise typically exhibited by the polished coatings (Fig. 4c, d). Indeed, the abrasive contribution of the asperities determines the friction coefficient also after long sliding distances.

After reducing the surface roughness (Ra) and skewness (Rsk) by means of a controlled mechanical polishing treatment, the friction coefficient displayed an increasing trend during the continuous tests (Fig. 4d). During the interrupted tests, the values of the friction coefficient of the polished discs were higher than the values detected for the as-sprayed coatings. However, the same increasing trend as observed in the continuous tests was not detected (Fig. 4a). The general increase in the friction coefficient measured with the polished coatings can be explained by the rise of the adhesive contribution (µad) associated with the increase in the load-bearing area. The increase in the adhesive contribution is particularly evident during the continuous tests. Rabinowicz [35] related the strength of the adhesive forces to the degree of contaminants on the sliding surfaces. The interruptions of the sliding tests lead to a higher degree of contamination, due to air humidity and pollutants, whose lubricating action hinders the rise of the friction coefficient to the same value as in the continuous test regime.

5 Conclusions

The running-in wear behaviour of a commercial friction material (pin) dry sliding against two types of HVOF coatings was evaluated. The surface parameters, i.e., the roughness, Ra, and the surface asperity skewness, Rsk, were related to the wear behaviour of the coatings. The main findings can be summarized as follows:

  • the decrease in the surface roughness and skewness, achieved with a mechanical polishing treatment, reduces the abrasive contribution of the asperities leading to lower wear rates of the pins and to a lower material transfer on the disc surfaces;

  • the initial wear rate of the friction material (A1) is significantly reduced by applying the polishing treatment, resulting in a shorter and more efficient running-in stage;

  • the disc surface polishing reduces the steady-state wear of the friction material (W) by two order of magnitude with respect to the tests performed on the as-sprayed coatings;

  • the results show that starting the running-in with a negatively skewed coating surface is fundamental to achieve the best frictional performances;

  • the spontaneous surface modifications originating from wear phenomena during PoD testing are not as efficient as the controlled mechanical polishing in reducing the skewness and in improving the performances of the as-sprayed coated discs.

Ongoing research is focusing on the optimization of the composition of the coatings and of the friction material with the twofold aim: improving brake performances and reducing the emission of particulate matter during the braking action, in order to comply with the international regulations and standard. In this regard, the low wear rate of the pin-disc system looks promising indeed, since clear indications on the critical parameters can be inferred. The further optimization of the friction materials will be pursued by taking into account the different roles of the main constituents on the overall wear and frictional performances of these materials. Based on this consideration, the role of reinforcing fibres, abrasives and fillers has to be analysed. Starting from the experimental results presented in this paper, dyno bench tests will be carried out to evaluate the performances of real components.