Abstract
Eighteen species of Dendromonocotyle Hargis, 1955 (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) have so far been described from elasmobranchs worldwide. In this paper, two new species are described; Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii n. sp. from the skin of the Japanese eagle ray, Myliobatis tobijei Bleeker from Tokyo Bay and the pitted stingray, Dasyatis matsubarai Miyosi, from Ooarai, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan, and Dendromonocotyle fukushimaensis n. sp. from the skin of the cow stingray, Dasyatis ushiei (Jordan & Hubbs) reared at an aquarium in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii is distinguished from the congeners by the presence of a sclerotised duct connecting the vagina with the seminal receptacle, and De. fukushimaensis by the large body size and the presence of a donut-shaped structure encircling the male copulatory organ near its distal end. Additionally, the reproductive system of Dendromonocotyle akajeii Ho & Perkins, 1980 is redescribed, based on specimens from the skin of the whip stingray, Hemitrygon akajei (Müller & Henle) (syn. Dasyatis akajei) caught in Hamana Lake, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. A key to the 20 species of Dendromonocotyle including the present new species is provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
More than 200 species of elasmobranchs are known from Japanese waters (Nakabo, 2013), but only a few species have been examined for parasites. Among the parasites recorded so far, the majority are cestodes and copepods (Yamaguti, 1934, 1952; Shiino, 1954a, b, 1957a, b; Izawa, 2010; Nagasawa & Uyeno, 2015). As for monogeneans, only twelve species are known to infect elasmobranchs from Japanese waters. They comprise six species of monocotylids, i.e. Triloculotrema japanicae Kearn, 1993, Monocotyle ijimae Goto, 1894, Calicotyle mitsukurii Goto 1894, Calicotyle japonica Kitamura, Ogawa, Shimizu, Kurashima, Mano, Taniuchi & Hirose, 2010, Heterocotyle chinensis Nitta & Nagasawa, 2015 and Dendromonocotyle akajeii Ho & Perkins, 1980, five species of hexabothriids, i.e. Rajonchocotyle kenojei Yamaguti, 1938, Squalonchocotyle laymani Yamaguti, 1958, Onchocotyle spinacis Goto, 1894 [now assigned as an unconfirmed species of Squalonchocotyle Cerfontaine, 1899 by Boeger & Kritsky (1989)], Erpocotyle modama Iwata, 1991, and Squalonchocotyle mitsukurii Kitamra, Ogawa, Taniuchi & Hirose, 2006, and one species of microbothriid, Haplocotyle japonica Nitta & Nagasawa, 2017.
Species of Dendromonocotyle Hargis, 1955 are parasites of the skin of rays of the families Dasyatidae, Myliobatidae and Urolophidae (see Chisholm et al., 2004). Irigoitia et al. (2016) reported a new Dendromonocotyle from Zearaja chilensis (Guichenot) (Rajidae) and the genus is known to infect rays of four families, currently comprising 18 species (Irigoitia et al., 2016). Among the nine species of rays of the genus Dasyatis distributed in Japanese waters (Nakabo, 2013), Dasyatis akajei (Müller & Henle) [now reclassified as Hemitrygon akajei (Müller & Henle) by Last et al. (2016)] is the only species from which species of Dendromonocotyle have been recorded. Ho & Perkins (1980) described this species collected from H. akajei (as Da. akajei), caught in Toyama Bay, Sea of Japan. In the present study, we had a chance to examine Dendromonocotyle specimens which had been collected from three species of rays caught on the Pacific coast of Japan, the Japanese eagle ray Myliobatis tobijei Bleeker, the pitted stingray Dasyatis matsubarai Miyosi and the cow stingray Dasyatis ushiei (Jordan & Hubbs), all of which have been poorly examined parasitologically. From M. tobijei, the nematode Raphidascaroides myliobatum Yin & Zhang, 1983 [now a synonym of Mawsonascaris myliobatum according to Li et al. (2012)], and the cestode Echeneibothrium tobijei Yamaguti, 1934 (see Yamaguti, 1934, 1952), from Da. matsubarai, the parasitic copepod Trebius akajei Shiino, 1954 (see Kido et al., 2016), the parasitic isopod Gnathia capillata Nunomura & Honma, 2004 and from Da. ushiei, and the parasitic copepod Pseudocharopinus markewitschi (Gusev, 1951) (see Nagasawa & Uyeno, 2015).
This paper reports two new species of Dendromonocotyle, one from M. tobijei and Da. matsubarai and the other from Da. ushiei in the Pacific and provides a redescription of De. akajeii newly collected from H. akajei in Lake Hamana. The new species represent a 14th and 15th monogeneans from Japanese elasmobranchs and Dendromonocotyle comprises 20 species worldwide.
Materials and methods
Dendromonocotylids were sampled from four species of rays in Japan: Japanese eagle ray M. tobijei and pitted stingray Da. matsubarai Miyosi caught in Tokyo Bay in June, 1996 and off Ooarai between March, 1993 and July, 1997, respectively; cow stingray, Da. ushiei reared at an aquarium in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan (dissected in August 2006); whip stingray, H. akajei caught in Hamana Lake in July 2003. Monogeneans were collected from the skin of rays, flattened between a coverslip and slide glass and fixed in AFA. They were stained with Heidenhain’s iron hematoxylin or alum carmine, dehydrated in a graded alcohol series and mounted in Canada balsam. Figures were drawn with the aid of a drawing tube. Measurements were made using Nikon Distal Sight DS-L2 measurement system and given in micrometres as the range followed by the mean and the number of specimens measured in parentheses (only when all of the specimens could not be measured).
Paratypes of the following material were examined for comparison: Dendromonocotyle pipinna Chisholm & Whittington, 2004 (South Australian Museum 28452–28456, 28536) and De. akajeii Ho & Perkins, 1980 (U.S. National Parasite Collection 077682.00)
Fish scientific names follow Nakabo (2013) and Eschmeyer et al. (2018).
To comply with the regulations set out in article 8.5 of the amended 2012 version of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 2012), details of all new taxa have been submitted to ZooBank. For each new taxon, the Life Science Identifier (LSID) is reported in the taxonomic summary.
Family Monocotylidae Taschenberg, 1879
Genus Dendromonocotyle Hargis, 1955
Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii n. sp.
Type-host: Myliobatis tobijei Bleeker (Myliobatiformes: Myliobatidae), Japanese eagle ray; Japanese name: tobi-ei.
Other host: Dasyatis matsubarai Miyosi (Myliobatiformes: Myliobatidae), pitted stingray; Japanese name: hoshi-ei.
Type-locality: Off Nakanose (35°38′N, 139°46′E), Tokyo Bay, Tokyo Metropolis, Japan (18.vi.1996).
Other localities: Ex M. tobijei: off Ooarai (36°19′N, 140°35′E), Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (iii.1997; exact date not specified). Ex D. matsubarai: off Ooarai (36°19’N, 140°35’E), Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan (3.iii.1993; iii.1997; exact date not specified; 3.vii.1997).
Type-material: The holotype and paratypes are deposited in the Meguro Parasitological Museum (MPM coll. nos 21002–21006).
Site on host: Skin.
ZooBank registration: The Life Science Identifier (LSID) for Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii n. sp. is urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9FCF746D-7DFF-4805-8D7D-DE2F5342BD8A.
Etymology: The new species is named after the late Mr Toshio Tsutsumi, the collector of this parasite.
Description (Figs. 1–8)
[Based on 10 specimens.] Body, excluding haptor 3,341–6,139 (4,909) long, with maximum width 2,031–4,102 (2,891; n = 9) at level of testis (Fig. 1). Haptor diameter 1,597–2,202 (1,849) (Fig. 1). Haptoral rim with 55–60 marginal haptoral papillae, 121–237 (184) long, 58–116 (89) wide, each armed with 7–9 sclerites (Figs. 1, 2). Hamuli absent. Anterior loculus pair with 6 marginal haptoral papillae each; anterolateral and posterolateral loculus pairs with 7 associated marginal haptoral papillae each; posterior loculus pair with 8 marginal haptoral papillae each, categorised as type A (Vaughan et al., 2008). Marginal hooklets 7–14 (11) long, distributed in marginal valve symmetrically between every 4 papillae (Fig. 3A). Four types of sclerites present (Fig. 3); terminal papillary sclerite 8–16 (11) long, 18–32 (24) wide (Fig. 3B); papillary sclerite 5–9 (7) long, 8–14 (9) wide (Fig. 3C); outer ring sclerite 4–9 (7) long, 8–15 (10) wide (Fig. 3D); inner ring sclerite 6–10 (8, n = 5) long, 9–13 (11, n = 5) wide (Fig. 3D); septal sclerite, outer side 3–12 (7) long, 9–19 (12) wide, inner side 5–11 (8) long, 8–15 (13) wide (Fig. 3E). Number of sclerites in outer ring 190–213 (n = 4), in inner ring 40–51 (n = 5).
Oral sucker ventral, 142–247 (178) long, 214–377 (274) wide. Eye-spots antero-dorsal to pharynx (Fig. 1). Pharynx 297–582 (416, n = 9) long, 302–627 (437) wide. Intestinal caeca bifurcate just posterior to pharynx, extending to posterior end of body proper. Pigment present in caeca.
Testis single, 858–1,251 (1,147) long, 1,274–2,051 (1,660) wide. Vas deferens originating from anterior end of testis, tightly coiled, running antero-sinistrally then antero-dextrally, passing dorsal to vagina, tapering and curving dextrally in front of ejaculatory bulb, delated to form seminal vesicle, 66–91 (79) wide, then entering into ejaculatory bulb posteriorly (Fig. 4). Ejaculatory bulb 182–273 (211) long, 157–245 (189) wide. Male copulatory organ sclerotised, short, 101–149 (121) long in a straight line, 20–33 (26) wide at base, almost constant in width except base, 6–9 (7) wide; sclerotised ridges not observed at distal end (Fig. 5).
Ovary, roughly triangular, 319–588 (461) wide, looping vitelline duct dorsally, leading to seminal receptacle (Fig. 4). Vagina opening in slightly sinistral field of body at level of caecal bifurcation (Fig. 1); opening funnel-shaped, 20–49 (29) wide, followed by muscular bulb, 41–77 (56) long, 27–40 (34) wide (Fig. 6), and narrow duct, 164–491 (310) long, 8–19 (14, n = 9) wide, leading to a gourd-shaped portion, 331–963 (541) long, 114–232 (165, n = 7) wide proximally and 161–338 (238, n = 7) wide distally; its distal portion tapered, leading to narrow, winding sclerotised duct, 47–78 (63) long in straight line, 2–3 (2.4) wide, surrounded by thick muscle fibers, funnel-shaped at both ends, finally connected with a short projection of seminal receptacle (Figs. 7, 9A). Seminal receptacle spherical, 88–192 (134) in diameter. Oötype 324–499 (428) long, 131–199 (164) wide. Uterus muscular, 59–88 (70) wide. Egg tetrahedral, 80–102 (91) long, 79–117 (99) wide with a filament, 94–179 (129, n = 7) long (Fig. 8). Common genital pore at level of ejaculatory bulb (Fig. 4).
Remarks
Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii n. sp. can be distinguished from the other congeners by the combination of the following morphological features: all haptoral septa joining inner ring septum, presence of outer ring septal sclerites, haptor with 55–60 marginal papillae, absence of hamuli, short male copulatory organ, and presence of a narrow sclerotised duct before connection with the seminal receptacle. This new species is most similar to De. pipinna, in which the duct between the vagina and seminal receptacle is not sclerotised. This sclerotised structure has never been described before in the known species of Dendromonocotyle.
Dendromonocotyle fukushimaensis n. sp.
Type-host: Dasyatis ushiei (Jordan & Hubbs), (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae), cow stingray; Japanese name: ushi-ei.
Type-locality: Environmental Aquarium Aquamarine Fukushima (36°56′N, 140°54′E), Onahama, Iwaki-shi, Fukushima, Japan (26.viii.2006). The host had been caught off Fukushima in the Pacific (accurate locality not specified), brought into the aquarium.
Site on host: Skin.
Type-material: The holotype and paratypes are deposited in the Meguro Parasitological Museum (MPM coll. nos 21033–21034).
ZooBank registration: The Life Science Identifier (LSID) for Dendromonocotyle fukushimaensis n. sp. is urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B47BFDAF-056F-4816-A480-B14F034104DF.
Etymology: The new species refers to the locality of the aquarium where the host had been reared.
Description (Figs. 9B, 10–18)
[Based on 5 specimens.] Body, excluding haptor 13,300 (9,100–15,700) long, with maximum width 5,100–7,100 (6,300) at level of testis (Fig. 10). Haptor diameter 4,200–6,500 (5,400) (Fig. 10). Haptoral rim with 54–56 (n = 3) marginal haptoral papillae, 176–469 (374) long, 177–328 (239) wide, each armed with 6–13 sclerites (Figs. 10, 11). Hamuli absent. Anterior loculus pair with 6 marginal haptoral papillae each; anterolateral and posterolateral loculus pairs with 7 associated marginal haptoral papillae each; posterior loculus pair with 8 marginal haptoral papillae each, categorised as type A (Vaughan et al., 2008). Marginal hooklets 10–16 (14) long distributed in marginal valve symmetrically between every 4 papillae (Fig. 12A). Five types of sclerites present (Fig. 12): terminal papillary sclerite 20–28 (24) long, 50–67 (60) wide (Fig. 12B); papillary sclerite 13–16 (15) long, 23–29 (26) wide (Fig. 12C); outer ring sclerite 12–19 (14) long, 22–29 (24) wide (Fig. 12D); inner ring sclerite 12–15 (14, n = 4) long, 18–25 (20, n = 4) wide (Fig. 12E); septal sclerite, 17–24 (20) long, 29–39 (34) wide (Fig. 12F). Number of sclerites in outer ring 192–236, in inner ring 44–54 (n = 4).
Oral sucker ventral, 202–491 (315) long, 569–885 (768) wide. Six pairs of anterolateral gland duct openings present (Fig. 10). Pharynx 510–726 (659) long, 587–813 (710) wide. Intestinal caeca bifurcate just posterior to pharynx, extending to posterior end of body proper. Pigment present in caeca.
Testis single, 2,300–3,700 (2,800) long, 3,100–4,500 (4,000) wide. Vas deferens originating from anterior end of testis, tightly coiled, running antero-sinistrally, passing dorsal to vagina, tapering and curving dextrally in front of ejaculatory bulb, delated to form seminal vesicle, 126–217 (172) wide, then entering into ejaculatory bulb posteriorly (Fig. 13). Ejaculatory bulb 372–552 (484) long, 340–621 (456) wide. Male copulatory organ (MCO), sclerotised, gently curved, 159–177 (171) long in a straight line, 19–34 (26) wide at base, 5–10 (7) at distal end (Fig. 14); encircled by collar near distal end, thickened centrally, 14–19 (16) long, 14–15 (15) wide, 1.5–2.4 (2.1) thick in middle; donut-shaped ring at base of collar 1.2–4.1 (3.7) long, 17–20 (19) wide, 3.6–4.6 (4.0) thick; 12–22 (16) from distal end of collar to distal end of MCO, 130–143 (138) from base of MCO to ring (Fig. 15A, B).
Ovary branched, 1,239–1,713 (1,550) wide, looping right intestinal ceacum dorso-ventrally, leading to seminal receptacle (Fig. 13). Vaginal opening 6–9 (8, n = 2) wide in slightly sinistral field of body at level of posterior part of pharynx (Fig. 10). Vaginal duct narrow initially, 63–77 (70, n = 2) long, 2.5–3.0 (2.8, n = 2) wide, followed by glandular part, gradually widening distally, 294–399 (347) long, 41–62 (52, n = 2) wide, directing centrally at level of ejaculatory bulb, dorsal to vas deferens, leading to narrow sclerotised duct, 82–127 (114, n = 4) long, 0.9–1.4 (1.1) wide, surrounded by muscle fibers, funnel-shaped at both ends, finally connected with seminal receptacle (Figs. 9B, 16), spherical, 197–369 (298) in diameter. Oötype muscular, 441–540 (469) long, 172–186 (177) wide (Fig. 17). Common genital pore at level of ejaculatory bulb (Fig. 10). Egg tetrahedral, 64–94 (84) wide, with a filament 225–414 (319) long (Fig. 18).
Remarks
Dendromonocotyle fukushimaensis n. sp. can be distinguished from the other congeners by the combination of the following morphological features: all haptoral septa joining inner ring septum, presence of outer ring septal sclerites, haptor with 54–56 marginal papillae, absence of hamuli, short male copulatory organ, and presence of a narrow sclerotised duct before connection with the seminal receptacle.
This new species is most similar to Dendromonocotyle centrourae Cheng & Whitaker, 1993, from which it differs in the body size (9.1–15.7 mm long in De. fukushimaensis n. sp. vs 6.32–7.22 mm long in De. centrourae), the number of sclerites in the outer ring of the haptor (192–236 vs 150–170), the terminal papillary sclerites (two outer prongs slightly curved inward, about 60 μm wide vs two outer prongs strongly bent inward, about 30 μm wide; Chisholm & Whittington, 1995), male copulatory organ (encircled by a collar with a donut-shaped ring vs encircled by a donut-shaped ring only) and the duct between the vagina and seminal receptacle (sclerotised vs non-sclerotised). Geographical distribution of the hosts is also different, coastal area of Japan for De. fukushimaensis vs Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea for De. centrourae (see Cheng & Whitaker, 1993).
Dendromonocotyle akajeii Ho & Perkins, 1980
Host: Hemitrygon akajei (Muller & Henle) (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae).
Locality: Lake Hamana (34°25′N, 136°22′E), Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan (29.vii.2003).
Site on host: Dorsal skin.
Voucher material: 20 specimens deposited in the Meguro Parasitological Museum (MPM coll. no. 21007).
Redescription (Figs. 19–23)
[Based on 10 specimens.] Body, excluding haptor 2,264–3,806 (3,203) long, with maximum width 1,183–2,075 (1,670) at level of testis. Haptor diameter 905–1,238 (1,088). Haptoral rim with 55–57 marginal haptoral papillae, 74–105 (86) long, 23–49 (38) wide, each armed with 6–8 sclerites. Hamuli absent. Anterior loculus pair with 6 marginal haptoral papillae each, anterolateral and posterolateral loculus pairs with 7 associated marginal haptoral papillae each, posterior loculus pair with 8 marginal haptoral papillae each, categorised as type A (Vaughan et al., 2008). Marginal hooklets 7–12 (10) long distributed in marginal valve symmetrically between every 4 papillae. Four types of sclerites present; terminal papillary sclerite 7–14 (9) long, 16–39 (27) wide; papillary sclerite 3–7 (5) long, 8–15 (11) wide; outer ring sclerite 4–9 (7, n = 9) long, 11–17 (13, n = 9) wide; inner ring sclerite 5–8 (7, n = 9) long, 10–18 (13, n = 9) wide; septal sclerite, outer side 7–14 (9, n = 9) long, 14–26 (19, n = 9) wide, inner side 6–11 (8, n = 9) long, 13–22 (17, n = 9) wide . Number of sclerites in outer ring 119–120 (n = 2), in inner ring 33–34 (n = 2).
Oral sucker ventral, 18–87 (55) long, 100–181 (143) wide. Eye-spots antero-dorsal to pharynx. Pharynx 168–254 (216) long, 181–299 (261) wide. Intestinal caeca bifurcate just posterior to pharynx, extending to posterior end of body proper. Pigment present in caeca.
Testis single, 289–639 (416) long, 572–1,204 (750) wide. Vas deferens originating from anterior part of testis, running anteriorly, passing right vitelline duct and vaginal duct dorsally, and at level of intestinal bifurcation, turning dextrad to form seminal vesicle in slightly right field of body. Seminal vesicle sausage-shaped, deeply bent in middle, 53–77 (65) wide (Fig. 19); narrow duct emerging at its base, directing antero-sinistrally and soon folding back postero-sinistally, finally leading to anterior part of ejaculatory bulb (Fig. 19). Ejaculatory bulb ellipsoidal, 187–310 (262) long, 138–267 (208) wide (Fig. 19). Sclerotised male copulatory organ narrow, straight and long, 431–490 (470) long, 4–7 (5) wide (Fig. 20), with hook-like projection at beginning of a spiral, armed with spike-like projections in distal portion, 75–113 (101) long (Figs. 19, 20). Proximal portion of male copulatory organ covered with muscular sheath, 202–320 (258) long, 35–58 (46) wide (Fig. 19). Entire male copulatory organ covered with thin sheath (Fig. 19).
Ovary looping right vitelline duct, receiving common vitelline duct and short duct from seminal receptacle before leading to oötype (Fig. 19). Oötype, 212–316 (270) long, 104–146 (121) wide, directing antero-dextrally, ventral to male copulatory organ, followed by short uterus curving antero-sinistrally, leading to genital pore (Fig. 19). Seminal receptacle 97–151 (118) long, 145–251 (184) wide just behind joining of right and left vitelline ducts (Fig. 19). Vagina opening ventrally, slightly sinistral to left intestinal caecum at level of posterior end of ejaculatory bulb (Fig. 19). Vagina consisting of distal duct, 214–314 (257) long, central spheroid body, 261–403 (342) long, 182–307 (226) wide and proximal duct, 231–399 (339) long (Fig. 19). Main part of distal duct glandular, followed by short, non-glandular connecting part, leading to narrow, twisted, glandular portion to connect with spheroid body (Fig. 21). Tip of proximal duct funnel-shaped, sclerotised, 20–53 (34) long, 35–93 (54) wide, leading to seminal receptacle (Fig. 19). Proximal duct showing different degrees of invagination into spheroid body (Figs. 19, 22, 23). Egg tetrahedral, 33–110 (82) long, 61–114 (87) wide with a filament, 39–127 (95) long (Fig. 19).
Remarks
Hemitrygon akajei is distributed widely in Japanese waters. Dendromonocotyle akajeii was recorded on H. akajei (as Dasyatis akajei) from the Sea of Japan (Ho & Perkins, 1980). In the present study, the monogenean was collected from the same host species on the Pacific side. It remains to be studied whether De. akajeii is also widely distributed as the fish host.
The female reproductive system of De. akajeii is redescribed in this paper. The spheroid body of the vagina, interpreted as a seminal receptacle by Ho & Perkins (1980) in their new species description, shows different shapes depending on the degree of invagination of the proximal part. No such different states of the vagina were reported in the original description. Olson & Jeffries (1983) reexamined the type-specimens of De. akajeii and suggested that what Ho & Perkins (1980) described as a seminal receptacle was a spermatophore. Later, Chisholm & Whittington (1995) noted that it was not a spermatophore but the seminal receptacle as in Ho & Perkins (1980). However, it was revealed that the vagina is much longer, followed by a spherical seminal receptacle.
Discussion
To date, there are 20 species of Dendromonocotyle including De. tsutsumii n. sp. and De. fukushimaensis n. sp., which are the second and third species of the genus reported from Japanese waters. Four host species have been recorded as hosts of De. akajeii, De. tsutsumii n. sp. and De. fukushimaensis n. sp. in Japan: H. akajei, Da. matsubarai, Da. ushiei and M. tobijei. Thirty-two species of Myliobatiformes are present in Japanese waters (Nakabo, 2013). Many more Dendromonocotyle species will be found from the remaining 28 species of Japanese rays.
Species of Dendromonocotyle are generally host-specific. Only four out of 18 species described so far infect more than one species of host: Dendromonocotyle octodiscus Hargis, 1955 from Dasyatis say (Lesueur), Dasyatis marmorata (Steindachner) and Urolophus jamaicensis (Cuvier); De. citrosa Vaughan, Chisholm & Christison, 2008 from Dasyatis chrysonota (Smith) and Maculabatis gerrardi (Gray); De. ukuthena Vaughan, Chisholm & Christison, 2008 from M. gerrardi and Himantura uarnak (Forskål); and De. colorni Chisholm, Whittington & Kearn, 2001 from H. uarnak and M. gerrardi. Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii n. sp. is another species of the genus collected from two species of rays, M. tobijei and Da. matsubarai. These rays belong to different families, as in the case of De. octodiscus, but are common species in the Pacific coastal areas of Japan with overlapping habitats (Nakabo, 2013). Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii may have a wider host range, as many more Myliobatiformes rays inhabit Japanese waters, which remains to be studied.
Of the 20 species, only De. tsutsumii n. sp. and De. fukushimaensis n. sp. have a sclerotised part at the distal end of the vaginal duct before connection with the seminal receptacle. Muscle bundles at the base of the sclerotised part may control the flow of sperm from the vagina into the seminal receptacle.
Species of Dendromonocotyle are divided into two main groups by the type of the male copulatory organ; species with a short, arched tube and species with a long, straight tube. The latest key to Dendromonocotyle species proposed by Vaughan & Chisholm (2009) was based primarily on the types of the male copulatory organ. Three new species have been added to Dendoromonocotyle since Vaughan & Chisholm (2009): Dendromonocotyle rajidicola Irigoitia, Chisholm & Timi, 2016; De. tsutsumii; and De. fukushimaensis. Therefore, including the three species, the key to species of Dendromonocotyle has been revised in this paper.
Key to the species of Dendromonocotyle
1a Male copulatory organ not extending beyond level of posterior portion of ejaculatory bulb ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2
1b Male copulatory organ extending beyond level of posterior portion of ejaculatory bulb ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
2a Distal end of vaginal duct sclerotised ………………………………………………………………………… 3
2b Distal portion of vaginal duct not sclerotised ……………………………………………………………… 4
3a Male copulatory organ with donut-shaped structure at mid-length ………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………. De. fukushimaensis n. sp.
3b Male copulatory organ lacking donut-shaped structure at mid-length ……………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………… De. tsutsumii n. sp.
4a Male copulatory organ with donut-shaped structure at mid-length ……. De. centrourae
4b Male copulatory organ lacking donut-shaped structure at mid-length ……. De. pipinna
5a Haptoral septal pairs 2 and 3 not joining inner ring septum; outer ring of septal sclerites absent; hamuli present …………………………………………………………………………. De. californica
5b All haptoral septa joining inner ring septum; outer ring of septal sclerites present; hamuli present or absent ……………………………………………………………………………. 6
6a Haptor with 38 or 42 marginal papillae ……………………………………………………………………… 7
6b Haptor with 56 marginal papillae ………………………………………………………………………………. 9
7a Haptor with 38 marginal papillae; spines present at distal end of muscular sheath surrounding male copulatory organ …………………………………………………………………. De. lasti
7b Haptor with 42 marginal papillae ………………………………………………………………………………. 8
8a Distal end of male copulatory organ looping, accessory filaments present …………. De. ardea
8b Distal end of male copulatory organ not looping, accessory filaments absent; vaginal pore armed with spines ………………………………………………………………………………….. De. taeniurae
9a Hamuli present ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10
9b Hamuli absent ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13
10a Inner wall of vagina armed with spines …………………………………………………….. De. ukuthena
10b Inner wall of vagina unarmed ………………………………………………………………………………….. 11
11a Proximal end of vagina a sclerotised tightly coiled duct; haptoral papillae armed with 3–4 sclerites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. De. colorni
11b Proximal end of vagina not a sclerotised tightly coiled duct ……………………………………….. 12
12a Haptoral papillae armed with 7–8 sclerites including terminal papillary sclerite; male copulatory organ not extending to level of ovary ……………………………… De. akajeii
12b Haptoral papillae armed with 4–5 sclerites including terminal papillary sclerite; male copulatory organ extends to level of ovary …………………………………………………….. De. lotteri
13a Distal end of male copulatory organ lacking accessory filament ………………………………….. 14
13b Distal end of male copulatory organ with accessory filament(s) ……………………………………….. 16
14a Male copulatory organ with distinct spherical inflation at mid-length ……..…. De. urogymni
14b Male copulatory organ without distinct spherical inflation at mid-length ……………………… 15
15a Male copulatory organ extending beyond level of ovary; distal end simple tube coming to a point; terminal papillary sclerite keyhole-shaped ………………………………….. De. kuhlii
15b Male copulatory organ extending to level just beyond posterior portion of ejaculatory bulb; distal end widens; ovary anchor-shaped ………………………………………….. De. torosa
16a Distal end of male copulatory organ with 2 crisscrossed sperm ducts …………. De. bradsmithi
16b Distal end of male copulatory with single sperm duct ………………………………………………… 17
17a Distal end of sperm duct within male copulatory organ ending subterminally ……. De. octodiscus
17b Distal end of sperm duct within male copulatory organ ending terminally ……………………. 18
18a Distal end of sperm duct within male copulatory organ looping once ………. De. cortesi
18b Distal end of sperm duct within male copulatory organ not looping …………………………….. 19
19a Male copulatory organ short, not extending past level of testis ……………………….. De. citrosa
19b Male copulatory organ extending past level of testis …………………………………. De. rajidicola
References
Boeger, W. A., & Kritsky, D. C. (1989). Phylogeny, coevolution and revision of the Hexabothriidae Price, 1942 (Monogenea). International Journal for Parasitology, 19, 425–440.
Cheung, P., & Whitaker, B. (1993). A new dendromonocotylinid (monogenean) from the skin of the roughtail stingray, Dasyatis centroura Mitchill. Journal of Aquariculture and Aquatic Sciences, 6, 63–68.
Chisholm, L. A., & Whittington, I. D. (1995). A revision of Dendromonocotyle Hargis, 1955 (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) with a description of a new species from Pastinachus sephen (Forsskål) (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Journal of Natural History, 29, 1093–1120.
Chisholm, L. A., & Whittington, I. D. (2009). Dendromonocotyle urogymni sp. nov. (Monogenea, Monocotylidae) from Urogymnus asperrimus (Elasmobranchii, Dasyatidae) off eastern Australia. Acta Parasitologica, 54, 113–118.
Chisholm, L. A., Whittington, I. D., & Fischer, A. B. P. (2004). A review of Dendromonocotyle (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) from the skin of stingrays and their control in public aquaria. Folia Parasitologica, 51, 123–130.
Eschmeyer, W. N., Fricke, R., van der Laan, R. (Eds). (2018). Catalog of fishes: genera, species, references. Retrieved August 16, 2018, from http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp.
Ho, J. S., & Perkins, P. S. (1980). Monogenea from fishes of the Sea of Japan. Part 1. Order Monopisthocotylea. Annual Report of the Sado Marine Biological Station, Niigata University, 10, 1–10.
ICZN. (2012). International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature: Amendment of articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zootaxa, 3450, 1–7.
Irigoitia, M. M., Chisholm, L. A., & Timi, J. T. (2016). A new species of Dendromonocotyle Hargis, 1955 (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) from the skin of Zearaja chilensis (Guichenot) (Rajiformes: Rajidae) from the Argentine Sea. Systematic Parasitology, 93, 367–374.
Iwata, K. (1990). Ectoparasitic trematodes from marine fishes of Kyusyu, Japan I. The family Capsalidae (Monogenea). Medical Bulletin of Fukuoka University, 17, 427–440.
Izawa, K. (2010). Redescription of eight species of parasitic copepods (Siphonostomatoida, Pandaridae) infecting Japanese elasmobranchs. Crustaceana, 83, 313–341.
Kido, M., Onda, K., Miyagawa, Y., Kitadani, Y., & Asakawa, M. (2016). Parasites obtained from captive fishes kept in Osaka Aquarium Kaiyukan, Japan (Part 3). Journal of Rakuno Gakuen University, 41, 101–105.
Li, L., Xu, Z., & Zhang, L.-P. (2012). A new species of the genus Mawsonascaris Sprent, 1990 (Nematoda: Ascaridida) from Glaucostegus granulatus (Cuvier) (Rajiformes: Rhinobatidae) in the Taiwan Strait, with remarks on the systematic status of Raphidascaroides myliobatum Yin & Zhang, 1983. Journal of Natural History, 46, 1307–1309.
Nagasawa, K., & Uyeno, D. (2015). A checklist of copepods of the family Lernaeopodidae (Siphonostomatoida) from fishes in Japanese waters (1939–2015). Biosphere Science, 54, 125–151.
Nakabo, T. (2013). (Ed.) Fishes of Japan with pictorial keys to the species, 3rd edn. Hadano: Tokai University Press, 2428 pp.
Nitta, M., & Nagasawa, K. (2015). Heterocotyle chinensis (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) from the whip stingray Dasyatis akajei from the Seto Inland Sea, Japan. Species Diversity, 20, 89–93.
Nitta, M., & Nagasawa, K. (2017). Haplocotyle japonica n. gen., n. sp. (Monogenea: Microbothriidae) parasitic on Rhinobatos hynnicephalus (Elasmobranchii: Rajiformes: Rhinobatidae) in Japanese waters. Species Diversity, 22, 117–125.
Olson, A. C., & Jeffries, M. (1983). Dendromonocotyle californica sp. n. (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) from the bat ray, Myliobatis californica, with a key to species. Journal of Parasitology, 69, 602–605.
Last, P. R., Naylor, G. J. P., & Manjaji-Matsumoto, B. M. (2016). A revised classification of the family Dasyatidae (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes) based on new morphological and molecular insights. Zootaxa, 4139, 345–368.
Shiino, M. S. (1954a). Copepods parasitic on Japanese fishes. 2. On two new species of the family Trebidae. Report of the Faculty of Fisheries of Prefectural University of Mie, 1, 247–259.
Shiino, M. S. (1954b). Copepods parasitic on Japanese fishes. 5. Five species of the family Pandaridae. Report of the Faculty of Fisheries of Prefectural University of Mie, 1, 291–332.
Shiino, M. S. (1957a). Copepods parasitic on Japanese fishes. 13. Parasitic copepods collected off Kesennuma, Miyagi Prefecture. Report of the Faculty of Fisheries of Prefectural University of Mie, 2, 359–376.
Shiino, M. S. (1957b). Copepods parasitic on Japanese fishes. 15. Eudactylinidae and Dichelesthiidae. Report of the Faculty of Fisheries of Prefectural University of Mie, 2, 403–410.
Vaughan, D., Chisholm, L. A., & Christison, K. (2008). Overview of South African Dendromonocotyle (Monogenea: Monocotylidae), with descriptions of 2 new species from stingrays (Dasyatidae) kept in public aquaria. Zootaxa, 1826, 26–44.
Vaughan, D., & Chisholm, L. A. (2009). Three Dendromonocotyle species (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) reported from captive rays, including D. lotteri sp. n. from Himantura gerrardi (Elasmobranchii: Dasyatidae) in the public aquarium at the Atlantis resort, Dubai. Folia Parasitologica, 56, 99–106.
Yamaguti, S. (1934). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 4. Cestodes of fishes. Japanese Journal of Zoology, 6, 1–112.
Yamaguti, S. (1952). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 49. Cestodes of fishes, II. Acta Medicinae Okayama, 8, 1–98.
Acknowledgements
We thank the late Mr T. Tsutsumi for collecting specimens of Dendromonocotyle tsutsumii n. sp., Mr M. Iwata, Environmental Aquarium Aquamarine Fukushima, Iwaki-shi, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan for sending us specimens of De. fukushimaensis n. sp. and Mr N. Mizuno for collecting Hemitrygon akajei, the host of De. akajeii. We also express gratitude to the late Dr I. D. Whittington and Dr L. A. Chisholm, South Australian Museum, for the loan of four paratypes of Dendromonocotyle pipinna Chisholm & Whittington, 2004 and Dr P. Pilitt, US National Parasite Collection, Beltsville, USA for the loan of a paratype of H. akajei Ho & Perkins, 1980 and Dr. Anna Phillips, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USA for sending images of the type specimens of Dendromonocotyle centrourae Cheung & Whitaker, 1993 into video files. We also thank Dr David Vaughan, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia for his useful comments on the vaginal structure of De. citrosa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable institutional, national and international guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article was registered in the Official Register of Zoological Nomenclature (ZooBank) as ACD9C3D2-B75F-4FA6-96B2-22D35F2985A1. This article was published as an Online First article on the online publication date shown on this page. The article should be cited by using the doi number. This is the Version of Record.
This article is part of the Topical Collection Monogenea.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kitamura, A., Ogawa, K. Three species of Dendromonocotyle Hargis, 1955 (Monogenea: Monocotylidae) collected from Japanese rays. Syst Parasitol 96, 233–243 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-018-09837-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-018-09837-5