Abstract
The selectivity and the nature of the mechanism of the competitive Lewis acid catalysed [4+2]/[2+2] cycloaddition reactions of 1-methyl-1-phenylallene (MPA) with methylacrylate (MA) have been theoretically studied within the Molecular Electron Density Theory using DFT methods at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) theoretical level. DFT reactivity indices indicate that MPA is a strong nucleophile and the LA-MA complex is a strong electrophile. The coordination of LA to MA enhances the reaction rate and increases the asynchronicity of the [4+2] CA reaction, changes the nature of the mechanism from one step to stepwise for the [2+2] CA reaction and increases the polar character of these cycloaddition reactions, which become demands a relatively low activation energy. Analysis of different energy profiles indicates that these competitive LA-catalysed CA reactions favour the formation of a mixture of meta regioisomers in both types of cycloaddition, in which the [4+2] cycloadducts were obtained in majority amount, in agreement with the experiment. Analysis based on Electron Localisation Function topological shows that the favoured [4+2] CA reaction takes place through a non-concerted two-stage one-step mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cycloadditions are one of the most important organic reactions since they allow us to prepare both carbocyclic and heterocyclic structures with useful utilisation in medicinal and industrial fields [1]. The Diels–Alder cycloaddition is a key method for construct, in a regio- and stereocontrolled manner, six-membered rings. In addition, it represents a simple and economic synthetic tool for constructing complex molecules [2, 3]. On the other hand, [2+2] cycloadditions are mainly used to prepare four-membered cyclic compounds. The most catalytic enantioselective [2+2] cycloadditions require the use of highly polarised electron-rich and electron-poor alkenes [4,5,6]. The literature contains a great amount of both experimental and theoretical studies which treat the subject of mechanism and selectivities of Diels–Alder and [2+2] cycloaddition reactions [7,8,9,10]. Indeed, [2+2] cycloadditions usually proceed via a stepwise, biradical [11] or zwitterionic mechanism [12]. In addition, [4+2] cycloaddition reactions may be proceed with one-step synchronous non-polar mechanisms through a biradicaloidal transition states or through a stepwise biradical mechanism [13, 14]. In the other hand, these cycloadditions may be also occurring via a polar one-step two-stage or stepwise zwitterionic mechanism [15,16,17].
Recently, Conner et al. performed experimentally the Lewis acid (AlCl3) catalysed Diels-Alder cycloaddition between 1-methyl-1-phenylallene and methylacrylate [18]. They have found that this cycloaddition reaction is characterised by a high regioselectivity leading to the formation of meta cycloadducts as a one regiocycloadduct and favour the [4+2] cycloaddition over the [2+2] one (Scheme 1). It has been established that when [4+2] and [2+2] CAs reactions are in competition, some studies postulated that these cycloaddition are not independent, it proceed through the same biradical intermediate [19].
Contrariwise, some studies indicate that both types of cycloaddition proceed via completely independent channels without any common critical points [11].
Our research axis is based on the study of the mechanism and selectivities observed experimentally in cycloaddition reactions [20,21,22,23,24]. Therefore, herein, we undertook a theoretical investigation using transition state theory and DFT-based reactivity indices of the regio- and stereoselectivities for explaining experimentally meta regioselectivity performed by Conner’s group [18]. Furthermore, we deepen our study by analysing the nature of molecular mechanism in order to find the factors influenced on the selectivity and understanding the role of the Lewis acid catalyst in the reactivity and selectivity of these competitive cylcoaddition reactions between MPA with MA.
Calculation details
The geometries of all structures involved in this study were first introduced by GaussView 05 [25] then full optimised using Gaussian 09 suite of program [26]. The calculation was performed using quantum chemical DFT methods at the B3LYP/6-31G (d) level of theory [27,28,29,30]. The nature of all optimised stationary points (reactants, transition states and cycloadducts) was confirmed by frequency calculations, in which only TSs has a single imaginary frequency corresponding to the new forming bonds. The effects of dichloromethane (DCM) solvent were also evaluated using the polarisable continuum model (PCM) [31, 32] within the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) [33,34,35]. The thermodynamic proprieties such as enthalpies, entropies, and Gibbs free energies were computed at standard conditions; 298 K and 1 atm [36]. The electronic structures of stationary points were analysed by the natural bond orbital (NBO) method [37, 38]. The electron localisation function (ELF) topological analysis [39] was performed using Multiwfn software [40] from the B3LYP/6–31G(d) monodeterminantal wave functions of the pertinent points selected from the IRC diagram. The global electrophilicity index ω [41] is given by the expression, ω = μ2/2η focusing on the electronic chemical potential, μ, and the chemical hardness, η. These two quantities are calculated using the one-electron energies of the frontier molecular orbital HOMO and LUMO, εH and εL, as μ ≈ (εH + εL)/2 and η ≈ (εL − εΗ), respectively [42, 43]. The global nucleophilicity index Ν [44] is calculated also based on the HOMO energies [45] according the following equation, Ν = εHOMO (Nu) − εHOMO (TCE), where, (Nu) indicates the nucleophile and TCE is tetracyanoethylene used as reference. The Nucleophilic and electrophilic Parr functions [46] indicating the local reactive centres of the separated reactants were extracted from the analysis of the Mulliken atomic spin density (ASD) of the radical anion of electrophile fragments MA and MA-LA complex and the radical cation of the nucleophile fragment, MPA.
Results and discussion
This study is structured into four parts; the first is devoted to the analysis of the DFT reactivity indices of the reagents involved in these CA reactions of MPA with MA, in order to determine the electronic character and the regioselectivity of the reaction. The second part is dedicated to the exploration and characterisation of the energy profiles of the non-catalysed and Lewis acid catalysed [4+2] and [2+2] CA reactions between MPA and MA. At the last part, we placed an ELF topological analysis corresponding to the formation of the new C1–C6 and C4–C5 single bonds of the most favoured meta channel of the [4+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA.
DFT-based reactivity indices analysis
Global indices
The values of the global indices, namely, electronic chemical potentials (μ), the global electrophilicity indices (ω), the chemical hardness (η) and the global nucleophilicity indices N of the separated reagents MPA, MA and the corresponding Lewis acid coordinated complexes MA-LA are calculated using the above relations and collected in Table 1.
A comparison between the electronic chemical potential (μ) values shows that the MPA presents a highest values (− 3.24 eV) than that of MA (− 4.30 eV) and the MA-LA (− 5.46), indicating that the flux of global electron density transfer (GEDT) will take place from MPA towards MA or MA-LA. Therefore, the MPA will react as a nucleophile, whereas, both MA and MA-LA are considered as an electrophilic reagents. Moreover, the global electrophilicity index value of MA (1.51 eV) is higher than that of MPA (1.01 eV). This high value indicates that this ethylenic species is classified according to the absolute scale of electrophilicity [47] on the borderline of moderate electrophile. Coordination of Lewis acid AlCl3 to the carbonyl oxygen atom of the MA will increase dramatically the electrophilicity of this ethylene towards 3.25 eV, and thereby become a strong electrophile, which explain the decrease of the activation energy and increase the polar character of these CA reactions (see latter). On the other hand, the global nucleophilicity indices of the MPA, MA and MA-LA confirm that MPA is a good nucleophile, whereas, MA and MA-LA complex are a bad nucleophiles. The low electorphilicity difference between the MPA and MA (∆ω = 0.50 eV) indicates for high activation energy and the low polar character of this CA reaction. However, the coordination of Lewis acid to the MA (MA-LA) increases considerably this difference to become 2.24 eV, explaining both low activation energy and the high polar character of the associated CA reaction.
Local indices
To predict the regioselectivity of these competitive CA reactions, recent studies indicate that the most favourable reactive channel is that implied the most two-centre interaction which occur between the most electrophilic centre of the electrophile and the most nucleophilic centre of the nucleophile [48,49,50,51,52,53]. Recently, Domingo and co-workers [46] discovered a new method based on the electrophilic and nucleophilic Parr functions P+k and P−k, respectively, which are obtained from the changes of spin electron density, occurred via the GEDT process. This method proved to be a powerful tool for the study of the local reactivity, and thereby, determine the observed experimental regioselectivity.
The maps of the Atomic Spin Density (ASD) of these systems, the radical cation of MPA and the radical anions of MA and MA-LA complex, together with the values of nucleophilic Parr indices of MPA and the electrophilic Parr indices of MA and MA-C are given in Fig. 1.
From Fig. 1, analyses of nucleophilic Parr indices of MPA indicate that the C1 carbon atom (see Scheme 1 for atom numbering) is the most nucleophilic centre of this nucleophile, P−C1 = 0.37. On the other hand, the electrophilic Parr indices of MA and MA-LA complex are mainly concentrated at the C6 carbon atom P−C6 = 0.56 for both electrophilic systems. Coordination of Lewis acid to MA does not modify the electrophilicity index of the C6 atom but it decrease that of C5 by moving it into the carbonyl function. Therefore, the present CA reactions leading to the formation of the cycloadduct generated from the interaction between C1 carbon atom of the MPA and the C6 one of MA and MA-LA, justifying the total meta regioselectivity for both [4+2] or [2+2] CA reactions, in agreement to the experimental observations [18].
Energy profiles and geometries analysis
Non-catalysed [4+2] CA reaction
Energies
Table 2 shows the values of the relative energies of the TSs and CAs corresponding to the [4+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA, in gas phase and in solution of dichloromethane, while total ones are given in Table S1 in Supporting Information. Owing to the asymmetry of both reactants, the [4+2] CA reactions of MPA with MA could take place along four reactive channels (see Scheme 2). The endo and exo nomenclatures are related to the two stereoisomeric approach modes of the methoxycarbonyle group of the MA towards the C1=C2–C3=C4 diene system of MPA. Therefore, along the endo approach, the methoxycarbonyle group is directed towards the diene system of the MPA framework, and for the exo approach is the opposite. The possible ortho and meta regioisomeric channels are corresponding to the interaction modes of the C5 or C6 carbon atoms of MA with the MPA C1 carbon, in such a manner that this last interact with C5 carbon atom along the ortho reactive pathway.
The analysis through IRC paths, which connected the TSs to its two minimums, indicated that the non-catalysed [4+2] reactions of MPA with MA take place through a one-step mechanism. Thereby, in addition to the separated reactants, we have located and characterised four TSs and the corresponding four cycloadducts (CAs) for this CA reaction.
From Table 2, the comparison between the activation energies of all reactive pathways indicates that the meta regioisomers is kinetically favoured than the ortho ones by about 8 kcalmol−1, in which the meta exo approach is slightly more favoured than the meta-endo one. On the other hand, the meta cycloadducts are more stable than the ortho ones. Therefore, the ortho reactive pathways are unfavourable both kinetically and thermodynamically; in greet agreement with experimental data.
In order to deepen our analysis of the energetic reaction profiles, we have included the effect of solvent-solute interactions along the reaction pathways. A comparison between the gas phase energy values and these of the dichloromethane shows that the activation energies decrease very slightly for the meta approaches and increase for the ortho ones, and remains the meta approaches the most favoured regioisomeric pathways.
Since the most organic reactions occurs in solution and demands an energetic enhancing such as heating or radiation, and these factors may be influenced on the energy values, a thermodynamic analysis of enthalpy, entropy, and free energy become necessary. Values of relative enthalpies, entropies, and Gibbs free energies of the stationary points involved in the [4+2] CA reaction of MPA with MA are displayed in Table 3, while total ones are given in Table S2 in Supporting Information.
Inclusion of thermal corrections to the electronic energies increases slightly the relative enthalpies by about 0.1 kcal mol−1 (see Table 3), in which the meta pathways are remaining more favourable than the ortho ones by about 8 kcal mol−1, demonstrating that these reactive pathways are characterised by an exothermic character. Addition of entropic contribution to enthalpies increases the Gibbs free energies by 13.29, 13.70, 14.51, and 14.44 kcal mol−1 for TS1on, TS1ox, TS1mn, and TS1mx, respectively. This increases is due to the unfavourable entropies associated with this bimolecular process, the reaction being endergonic by between 2.80 and 5.70 kcal mol−1. Analysis of the Gibbs free energies indicates that this [4+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA is rather unfavourable, having an activation Gibbs free energy of 35.99 kcal mol−1 for the more favourable TS1mn and being slightly endergonic, which accounts for the reversibility of this [4+2] CA reaction, thereby, the use of a Lewis acid for reducing the activation energies is required for the feasibility of this CA reaction.
Geometries analysis
The optimised geometries of the TSs associated with the non-catalysed [4+2] CA reaction of MPA with MA are given in Fig. 2. At the meta TSs, the distances C1… C6, and C4…C5 of the C1–C6 and C4–C5 single new forming bonds are 1.90 and 2.83 Å at TS1mn and 1.90 and 1.82 Å at TS1mx, respectively, while at the ortho TSs, the distances between C1…C5 and C4…C6 of the corresponding new single bonds are 2.06 and 2.23 Å at TS1on and 2.19 and 2.08 Å at TS1ox. Therefore, the new C–C single bonds at the most favourable meta TSs take place through an asynchronous bond formation processes, in which the formation of C1–C6 single bond is more advanced than the C4–C5 one, while for the ortho TSs is slightly synchronous. These remarks have been confirmed by the values of Wiberg bond indices [54] (see Fig. 2).
The electronic nature of the non-catalysed [4+2] CA reaction of MPA with MA was evaluated by calculating the value of GEDT [55] at all transition states. The values of the GEDT computed at the MA moiety of the TSs are 0.13e at TS1mn, 0.12e at TS1mx, 0.05e at TS1on and 0.06e at TS1ox. These low values indicate that the [4+2] CA reaction of MPA with MA has a low polar character, in agreement with the analysis of the global reactivity indices and with the obtained high activation energy for this CA reaction.
Non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction
Energies
In this part, the second competitive non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction of MPA with MA is also studied (see Scheme 3). Relative energies of the TSs and CAs involved in this [2+2] CA reaction, in gas phase and in dichloromethane solution are gathered in Table 4, while total ones are given in Table S3, in Supporting Information.
The gas phase activation energies associated with the four reactive channels of this CA reaction are 24.69 (TS2mn), 23.46 (TS2mx), 40.10 (TS2on) and 36.33 kcal·mol−1 (TS2ox), the reaction being exothermic by 26.33 (CA2mn), 28.56 (CA2mx), 26.33 (CA2on) and 26.36 kcal mol−1 (CA2mx). The high exothermic character of this CA reaction makes these [2+2] CA reaction pathways irreversible in gas phase. The activation energy of the most favourable meta/exo approach via TS2mx (23.46 kcal mol−1) is 12.87 kcal mol−1 lower than that associated with the most favoured stereoisomeric ortho/exo one via TS2ox. This high energy difference indicates that the non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA is completely meta regiospecific, yielding meta regioisomeric [2+2] CAs, in good agreement with the analysis of local indices and experimental observations.
Taking account that this CA reaction was carried out in dichloromethane solution, which can have some influence on the values of energies and geometries of stationery points, thereby, solvent effects were also studied. Inclusion of dichloromethane effects decreases slightly the gas phase activation energies by 1.04 (TS2mn), 0.71 kcal mol−1(TS2mx), and increase it by 0.32 for TS2on and 1.13 kcal mol−1 for TS2ox. In addition, this solvent also slightly decreases the exothermic character of the reaction for all reactive pathways. Although these changes in energies, solvent effects does not produce any change in the meta regioselectivity.
The values of the thermodynamic properties, namely, relative enthalpies, entropies and Gibbs free energies, associated with the four reactive channels of the non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA are listed in Table 5, while total ones are given in Table S4, in Supporting Information.
For the enthalpies, addition of the thermal corrections to the electronic energies did not significantly change the regioselectivity; while relative reaction enthalpies slightly decreased. For the free energies, addition of the entropic contribution to enthalpies strongly increases relative Gibbs free energies in the range of 14 kcal mol−1 due to the unfavourable entropies associated with this bimolecular process. Thus, the activation Gibbs free energies associated to the favourable regioisomeric approaches, TS2mn and TS-2mx reach to 37.17 and 37.95 kcal mol−1, respectively. Additionally, the reaction becomes slightly exergonic by 10.15 (CA2mn) and 11.34 kcal mol−1 (CA2mx). These results indicate that the meta regioisomers will be obtains as a single regioisomers under both kinetic and thermodynamic controls. Although, analysis of the Gibbs free energies reveals that the non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA is also very unfavourable, leading to the formation of the meta regioisomers, in complete agreement with the experimental outcomes. Interestingly, these energy results are very similar to these obtained for the non-catalysed [4+2] CA reaction as predicted by the analysis of the conceptual DFT reactivity indices.
Geometries of TSs
The geometries of the TSs associated with the non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA are shown also in Fig. 2. At the meta TSs, the distances between the C1 and C6 atoms of side, and C2 and C5 ones on the other side, which they involved in the formation of the C1–C6 and C2–C5 single bonds are 1.78 and 2.92 Å at TS2mn and are 1.84 and 2.94 Å at TS2mx, while at the ortho TSs, the distances between the corresponding atoms involved in the formation of the C1–C5 and C2–C6 single bonds are 1.64 and 2.65 Å at TS2on and 1.74 and 2.85 Å at TS2ox. Therefore, the formation of the new C–C single bonds at both meta and ortho TSs suggests a highly asynchronous bond formation processes, in which the formation of the single bond involving C1 atom is more advanced than the second one. This asynchronous mechanism has been confirmed by the analysis of Wiberg bond indices [54] (see Fig. 2).
The electronic nature of the non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction between MPA with MA was also evaluated by calculation of the GEDT [55] at the TSs associated with the four reactive pathways. The values of the GEDT computed at the MA moiety of the TSs are 0.16e at TS2mn, 0.14e at TS2mx, 0.06e at TS2on and 0.02e at TS2ox. These low values indicate that the non-catalysed [2+2] CA reaction of MPA with MA has a low polar character, in agreement with the analysis of the global reactivity indices and with the high activation energy computed for this CA reaction.
AlCl3 catalysed [4+2] and [2+2] CA reactions
Energies
Coordination of the oxygen atom (C=O) of MA with an AlCl3 catalyst notably increases its electrophilicity and enhances its reactivity towards electron-rich diene such as MPA. Accordingly, the Lewis acid catalysed [4+2] and [2+2] CA reactions of the MA-LA complex with MPA of the more favourable meta regioisomeric pathways were studied (Scheme 4). Relative energies for the TSs and cycloadducts involved in the TSs involved in the meta regioisomeric channel of the [4+2] and [2+2] CA reactions of MA-AlCl3 complex with MPA, in the gas phase and in dichloromethane are displayed in Tables 6 and 7, while total ones are given in Table S5 and S6, respectively, in Supporting Information.
Analysis of IRC paths of the AlCl3 catalysed [4+2] CA reactions of MPA with MA indicates that this CA reaction take place through a one-step mechanism, while the [2+2] CA one proceeds via a stepwise mechanism (See Fig. 3). Thereby, six TSs and the corresponding four cycloadducts (CAs) and two intermediates were located and characterised for these competitive CA reactions (see Scheme 4).
The gas phase activation energies associated with the meta regioisomeric AlCl3 catalysed [4+2] CA reaction are 10.49 (TS1mn-c) and 11.50 (TS1mx-c). For the comparison of [2+2] CA reaction energies with these of [4+2] CA reaction, we only considered the first step of this stepwise mechanism because it is the determining step of the reaction rate. The gas phase activation energies of this CA reaction are 13.17 (TS2mn-c1) and 12.93 kcalmol−1 for TS2mx-c1, thereby, a comparison between the [4+2] and [2+2] activation energies reveals that this CA reaction favour kinetically the formation of cycloadducts corresponding to the [4 + 2] processes. Furthermore, these energy results clearly indicate that with the use of the AlCl3 catalyst, the activation energy decrease by 12 kcal mol−1. This change makes the LA-catalysed competitive [4+2]/[2+2] CA reactions favour mostly the [4+2] reaction since it increase the energy difference to 2.44 kcalmol−1 between the most favoured approaches of these CA reactions, TS1mn-c1 and TS2mn-c1, which has been 1.10 kcalmol−1 in non-catalysed processes. In addition, this energy difference suggests the formation of a mixture of both CA1mn-c1 and TS2mn-c1, in which CA1mn-c1 is the major, in a greet agreement with experimental data [18].
Inclusion of dichloromethane effects stabilises slightly the reactants, TSs and cycloadducts relative to gas phase geometries. The most remarkable change with the inclusion of solvent effects is the increase of the activation energies and the decrease of the exothermic character of the reaction. This low solvent effect can be assigned to its low polar character (μ = 1.14D).
The values relative enthalpies, entropies and free energies associated to the meta regioisomeric [4+2] and [2+2] CA reactions are collected in Tables 8 and 9, while, total ones are collected in Table S7 and S8, respectively in Supporting Information.
From a comparison between the activation enthalpy values, we can notice a remarkable preference for the [4+2] meta–endo pathway in agreement with the predicted activation energy. The high negative values of the relative entropy indicate that these CA reactions are entropically unfavourable due to the geometry voluminous of both TSs and cycloadducts and the intermolecular process of these CA reactions. Thus, the addition of the entropic contribution to the enthalpy increases the free activation energy by about 11 kcal mol−1. In addition, all these reactive pathways are characterised by an exothermic character. On the other hand, the values of the free energy of the CAs account for the endergonic character of [4+2] process and the exergonic for the [2+2] pathways. Thereby, the formation of the [4+2] CAs occurs under kinetic control, whereas, the [2+2] ones is under thermodynamic control.
Geometries
The optimised geometries of the TSs involved in the competitive AlCl3 catalysed [4+2] and [2+2] CA reactions between MPA and MA are given in Fig. 4.
The lengths of the new forming bonds corresponding to the [4+2] CA reactions indicate that the LA catalyst changes completely the mechanism of these processes. Indeed, for the [2+2] CA reaction, the process changes from one step to stepwise mechanism, while for the [4+2] CA reaction, the mechanism becomes highly asynchronous, since the difference between the lengths of the new forming bonds is 1.07 and 1.19 Å for TS1mn-c and TS1mx-c, respectively. For the LA-catalysed [4+2] process, the BO’s values of the C1–C5 and C4–C6 new forming bonds confirm the above asynchronous remarks in which the C1–C5 bond formation is more advanced than the C4–C6 one.
The values of GEDT, which its flux takes place from MPA to the electrophilically activated LA-MA complex, are 0.29e (TS1mn-c) and 0.33e (TS1mn-c). The GEDT found in these TSs accounts for the polar character of this LA-catalysed CA reaction. Therefore, the LA catalyst increases the polar character of these CA reactions, explaining the decrease of the activation energies of these processes.
ELF topological analysis
ELF characterisation of the electronic structure of reagents
An attractive procedure that has given us a direct link between the distribution of electron density and the chemical structure is the quantum chemical topological analysis of ELF established by Becke and Edgecombe [39]. Several studies can be found in the literature which applies ELF topological analysis for different chemical systems can be found in the literature [56,57,58].
ELF localisation domains and their attractor positions, together with the most representative valence basin populations of MPA, MA and MA-LA are shown in Fig. 5. Recent studies based on Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) [59] indicate that the electronic structure of a molecules has a very good correlation with its reactivity [60,61,62].
The ELF analysis of MA structure indicates the presence of the following basins: two V(C5,C6) and V′(C5,C6) disynaptic with a population of 1.72e for each one and a disynaptic V(C,O) integrating an electron population of 2.38e. In addition, two mono synaptic basins V(O) and V′(O) integrating 2.68 and 2.63e, respectively, corresponding to non-bonding regions within the context of ELF. For the LA-MA complex, ELF topological analysis shows the presence of the same basins with a remarkable change of electron population. Indeed, the population of two V(C5,C6) and V′(C5,C6) disynaptic decreases to become integrating 1.67e for each one. The population of the disynaptic V(C,O) basin also decreases to 2.00e and contrariwise the population of the non-bonding regions V(O) and V′(O) becomes integrating 2.95 and 2.74e, respectively. These changes of electron population of the most relevant basins indicate that the addition of Lewis acid to MA pulls electron density towards him and consequently empty the reactive region of MA and enhance its reactivity towards a nucleophilic attack, which explain clearly the high electrophilicity of MA-LA and the low activation energies of the corresponding CA reactions.
For the MPA structure, ELF topological analysis of the most relevant basins corresponding to the reactive regions indicates the presence of a two disynaptic basins V(C1,C2) and V′(C1,C2) integrating a total population of 3.78e, whereas, the bonding region C3–C4 shows only one disynaptic basin V(C3,C4) integrating 2.72e. Consequently, ELF topological analysis of MPA structure reveals that C1–C2 bonding region is more reactive than the C3–C4 one, in greet agreement with the nucleophilic Parr function analysis (see above).
ELF topological analysis of the formation processes of the new C–C single bonds
In order to carry out an in-depth study of the mechanism of these CA reactions catalysed by AlCl3 and to characterise the nature of the formation of the new single bonds, an ELF topological analysis of some selected points on the IRC path of the most favourable meta-endo [4+2] reactive channel was performed. The electronic populations of the most significant valence basins with the corresponding ELF basin attractor positions of the selected structures of the IRC are shown in Fig. 6. ELF valence basin populations of these selected points corresponding to the formation of the C1–C5 and C4–C6 single bonds along the meta-endo [4+2] CA reaction of MPA with MA-LA, with distances and GEDT values are gathered in Table 10.
At TS1mn-c, some topological changes are observed on the reactive regions with respect to the structure of the ground state of both frameworks, which are the two new V(C1) and V(C5) monosynaptic basins, integrating 0.61 and 0.21e, respectively. These topological changes allow concluding that the initial C1–C2 and C5–C6 double bonds are already broken before TS point leading to the formation of a C1 and C5 pseudoradical centres necessary for the formation of the single new forming bond C1–C5.
At P1, a second remarkable change on the bonding region is the cohesion of the C1 and C5 pseudoradical centres in a new V(C1,C5) disynaptic basin with a population of 1.10e, indicating the beginning of the formation of the first C1–C5 single bond. In parallel, the population of the two disynaptic basins V(C1,C2) and V(C5,C6) keeps on decreasing to reach 2.67 and 2.72, respectively.
At P2, the most remarkable change is related to the slight increase of the population of the new V(C1,C5) disynaptic basin by 0.54e to become integrating 1.64 e. Decreasing of electron density is a consequence of the displacement of electron density from MPA over C1 atom. The population decreases of V(C1,C2) and V(C4,C5) disynaptic basins continue at this point and contributing to the increase of the population of the new forming bond C1–C5.
At P3, analysis of the bonding region’s basins indicates that no significant change was performed, only a slightly increase of the population of the V(C1,C5) disynaptic basin towards integrating 1.69e and decreasing of the V(C1,C2) and V(C4,C5) disynaptic’s population towards 2.32 and 2.11e, respectively.
At P4, which it considers the last step before the full formation of the cycloadduct, the most remarkable change is the formation of a two monosynaptic basins V(C4) et V′(C4) integrating a total population 2.02e, account for the zwitterionic character of this stage and the beginning of the formation of the second C4–C6 single bond.
Finally at CA1mn-c, the apparition of a V(C4,C6) disynaptic basin integrating 1.84 e indicates that the second C4–C6 single bond is formed at this point, which suggest the formation delay of the second new bond until the last stage of this CA reaction, while the population of the V(C1,C5) disynaptic basin related to the C1–C5 single bond decrease slightly to 1.96 e.
This ELF topological analysis associated to the formation of the C1–C5 and C4–C6 single reveals that the LA-catalysed [4+2] CA reaction takes place through a two-stage one-step mechanism [63] in which the formation of the second C4–C6 single bond begins when the first C1–C5 single bond is completely formed. The first C1–C5 single bond is formed through a formation of pseudo-diradical intermediate, while the second C4–C6 one is formed by a zwittérionic mechanism at the last stage of the reaction. These results account that the molecular mechanism is non-concerted.
Conclusion
The nature of mechanism, the regio-and the steroselectivities of the non-catalysed and AlCl3 Lewis acid catalysed completive [4+2]/[2+2] CA reaction between MPA and MA to yield predominately the meta [4+2] regioisomers have been studied by MEDT using quantum chemical DFT methods at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) computational level.
Analysis of the global reactivity indices allows classifying MPA as a strong nucleophile and MA as a moderate electrophile. The coordination of the AlCl3 catalyst with MA increases its reactivity to become a strong electrophile, which leading to enhance dramatically the polar character of the corresponding CA reaction, in clear agreement with the obtained high GEDT and the low activation energies. Analysis of the Parr functions explain well the total regioselectivity experimentally found in this cycloadditions.
In non-catalysed gas phase or in a solution, these competitive CA reactions preceded via an asynchronous mechanism favour the formation of the meta regioisomers kinetically and thermodynamically. The obtained low values of GEDT accounts for a low polar character of these CA reactions and well explaining the high activation energies. The most notice of the inclusion of dichloromethane effects is the slight increases of the activation energies and the decreases the exothermic character of these CA reactions.
Formation of MA-LA complex decreases the activation energies and increases the polar character of these CA reactions, leading to formation of a mixture of both [4+2] and [2+2] meta regioisomers, in which the meta [4+2] regioisomers is the major cycloadducts, in agreement with experimental data. The dichloromethane solvent effect has no influence on the selectivity but it increases slightly the activation energies. The analysis of activation Gibbs free energies reveals that the meta cycloadducts are favoured kinetically.
The LA-catalysed [4+2] CA reaction takes place via a highly asynchronous mechanism, while for the LA [2+2] CA reaction become proceeds through a stepwise mechanism.
ELF topological analysis of MA and MA-LA complex shows that the coordination of AlCl3 catalyst to MA enhances its reactivity towards a nucleophilic attack on the reactive region by moving the electron density of the C5=C6 double bond towards the oxygen atom of carbonyl function (C=O). The ELF topological analysis of MPA structure indicates that the C1=C2 reactive region is characterised by a high electron density than the C3=C4 one explaining its precedence in reactivity.
ELF topological analysis of the formation of the two new single bonds along the most favourable [4+2] meta/endo reaction pathway indicates that the formation of the first C1–C5 single bond takes place by coupling a C and C of C1 and C5 pseudoradical centres at the first stages of the reaction, while, the second C4–C6 single bond formed by the donation of a non-bonding electron density of the C5 carbon atom of ethylene fragment, which developed at the last stage of the reaction, account for a zwitterionic mechanism. The two-stage one-step mechanism of these CA reactions indicates that this mechanism is non-concerted.
References
W. Carruthers, Cycloaddition reactions in organic synthesis, Pergamon, Oxford, 1990
Fringuelli F, Taticchi A (1990) Dienes in the Diels–Alder reaction. Wiley, New York
Paquette LA (1991) In comprehensive organic synthesis, vol 5. PergamonPress, Oxford
Hayashi Y, Narasaka K (1989). Chem Lett:793
Narasaka K, Hayashi K, Hayashi Y (1994). Tetrahedron 50:4529
Takenaka Y, Ito H, Hasegawa M, Iguchi K (2006). Tetrahedron 62:3380
Mitsudo TA, Naruse H, Kondo T, Ozaki Y, Watanabe Y (1994). Angew Chem Int Ed 33:580–581
Wei D, Zhu Y, Zhang C, Sun D, Zhang W, Tang M (2011). J Mol Catal A Chem 334:108–115
Nacereddine AK, Yahia W, Sobhi C, Djerourou A (2012). Tetrahedron Lett 53:5784
Bouacha S, Nacereddine AK, Djerourou A (2013). Tetrahedron Lett 54:4030
Jasiński R (2016). Reac Kinet Mech Cat 119:49
Huisgen R (1980). Pure Appl Chem 52:2283
Firestone RA (1996). Tetrahedron 52(46):14459–14468
Singleton DA, Schulmeier BE, Hang C, Thomas AA, Leung SW, Merrigan SR (2001). Tetrahedron 57(24):5149–5160
Jasiński R, Kubik M, Łapczuk-Krygier A, Kącka A, Dresler E, Boguszewska-Czubara A (2014). React Kinet Mech Catal 113:333–345
Jasiński R (2014). Comput Theor Chem 1046:93–98
Jasiński R (2017). J Mol Graph Model 75:55–61
Conner ML, Brown MK (2016). Tetrahedron 72:3759
Bartlett PD, Wallbillich G, Wingrove AS, Swenton JS, Montgomery LK, Kramer BD (1968). J Am Chem Soc 90(8):2049–2056
Nacereddine K, Yahia W, Bouacha S, Djerourou A (2010). Tetrahedron Lett 51:2617
Yahia W, Khorief Nacereddine A, Liacha M, Djerourou A (2018). Int J Quantum Chem 118:e25540
Sobhi C, Nacereddine AK, Djerourou A, Aurell MJ, Domingo LR (2012). Tetrahedron 68:8457
Yahia W, Nacereddine AK, Liacha M (2014). Prog React Kinet Mec 39:365
Chafaa F, Hellel D, Nacereddine AK, Djerourou A (2016). Tetrahedron Lett 57:67–70
Dennington, R.; Keith, T.; Millam, J. (2009) GaussView, version 5; Semichem Inc.: Shawnee Mission, KS
Frisch MJ et al (2009) Gaussian 09, revision A.02. Gaussian Inc. Wallingford
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988). Phys Rev B 37:785
Becke AD (1993). J Chem Phys 98:5648
Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer PVR, Pople JA (1986) Ab initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley, New York
Tomasi J, Persico M (1994). Chem Rev 94:2027
Simkin BY, Sheikhet I (1995) Quantum chemical and statistical theory of solutions a computational approach. Ellis Horwood, London
Cances E, Mennucci B, Tomasi J (1997). J Chem Phys 107:3032
Cossi M, Barone V, Cammi R, Tomasi J (1996). Chem Phys Lett 255:327
Barone V, Cossi M, Tomasi J (1998). J Comput Chem 19:404
Becke AD (1993). J Chem Phys 98:5648
Becke AD, Weinstock RB, Weinhold F (1985). J Chem Phys 83:735
Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988). Chem Rev 88:899
Becke AD, Edgecombe KE (1990). J. Chem Phys 92:5397–5403
Lu T, Chen F (2012). J Comput Chem 33:580–592
Parr RG, Von Szentpaly L, Liu S (1999). J Am Chem Soc 121:1922–1924
Parr RG, Szentpaly LV, Liu S (1983). J Am Chem Soc 105:7512–7516
Parr RG, Yang W (1989) Density functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford University Press, New York
Jaramillo P, Domingo LR, Chamorro E, Pérez P (2008). J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 865:68–76
Kohn W, Sham LJ (1965). Phys Rev 140:1133–1138
Domingo LR, Pérez P, Sáez JA (2013). RSC Adv 3:1486–1494
Domingo LR, Aurell MJ, Pérez P, Contreras R (2002). Tetrahedron 58:4417
Domingo LR, Pérez P (2013). Org Biomol Chem 11:4350
Domingo LR, Emamian SR (2014). Tetrahedron 70:1267
Nacereddine AK, Layeb H, Chafaa F, Yahia W, Djerourou A, Domingo LR (2015). RSC Adv 5:64098
Chafaa F, Hellel D, Nacereddine AK, Djerourou A (2016). Mol Phys 114:663
Hellel D, Chafaa F, Nacereddine AK, Djerourou A, Vrancken E (2017). RSC Adv 7:30128
Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Chafaa F, Nacereddine AK, Djerourou A, Domingo LR (2016). J Mol Graphics Modell 70:296–304
Wiberg KB (1968). Tetrahedron 24:1083
Domingo LR (2014). RSC Adv 4:32415
Berski S, Gordon AJ (2012). Chem Phys Lett 525–526:24–31
Durlak P, Mierzwicki K, Latajka Z, Ratajczak H (2010). J Mol Struct 976:392–396
Hernández-Trujillo J, García-Cruz I, Martínez-Magadán JM (2005). Chem Phys 308:181–192
Domingo LR (2016). Molecules 21:1319
Emamian, S., Lu, T., Domingo, L. R., Saremi, L. H., Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. (2018). Chemical physics
Nasri L, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Nacereddine AK, Djerourou A, Domingo LR (2017). Theor Chem Acc 136(104)
Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Nasri L, Khorief Nacereddine A, Djerourou A, Domingo LR (2018). J Phys Org Chem:e3830
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2018). J Org Chem
Domingo LR, Saéz JA, Zaragozá RJ, Arnó M (2008). J Org Chem 73:8791
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 66 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barama, L., Bayoud, B., Chafaa, F. et al. A mechanistic MEDT study of the competitive catalysed [4+2] and [2+2] cycloaddition reactions between 1-methyl-1-phenylallene and methyl acrylate: the role of Lewis acid on the mechanism and selectivity. Struct Chem 29, 1709–1721 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-018-1152-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-018-1152-y