Abstract
Austrian economists today have a valuable opportunity to rejoin the mainstream of the economics profession. As Colander, Holt, and Rosser have argued, neoclassical orthodoxy is no long mainstream. What I call the “heterodox mainstream” is an emerging new orthodoxy. The five leading characteristics of the emerging new orthodoxy are bounded rationality, rule following, institutions, cognition, and evolution. When listed in this order, they suggest the acronym BRICE. The Austrian school is also an example of BRICE economics. The shared themes of BRICE economics create an opportunity for intellectual exchange between Austrians and other elements of the heterodox mainstream. Although Austrians should engage the heterodox mainstream energetically, they should also defend the essential elements of an early version of neoclassical economics, elements at risk of becoming half-forgotten themes of an earlier era. These elements are supply and demand, marginalist logic, opportunity-cost reasoning, and the elementary theory of markets.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baird, C. W. (2000). Alchian and menger on money. Review of Austrian Economics, 13(2), 115–120
Boettke, P. (1989). Evolution and econoimcs: austrians as institutionalists. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 6, 73–89.
Boettke, P., & Susan, A. (2004). The development set: the character of the journal of development economics 2002. Economic Journal Watch, 1(2), 306–318.
Butos, W. N. (2003). Knowledge questions: hayek, keynes, and beyond. Review of Austrian Economics, 16 (4), 291–307.
Butos, W., & Roger, K. (1993). Hayekian expectations: theory and empirical applications. Constitutional Political Economy, 4(3), 303–329.
Butos, W., & McQuade, T. Forthcoming. The sensory order and other adaptive classifying systems. Journal of Bioeconomics.
Chamlee-Wright, E. (1997). The cultural foundations of economic development. London and New York: Routledge.
Colander, D., Richard, P. F. H., & Rosser, J. B. Jr. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485–499.
Colander, D., Richard, Holt, P. F., & Rosser, J. B. Jr. (2005). The changing face of economics: conversations with cutting edge economists. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Fraser, L. M. (1932). How do we want economists to behave? The Economic Journal, 42, 555–570.
Garrison, R. (1985). The costs of a gold standard. In H. Llewellyn, Rockwell, Jr. (ed.), The gold standard: an austrian perspective (pp. 61–79). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Co.
Gilad, B. (1982). On encouraging entrepreneurship: an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 11(1), 132–163.
Harper, D. (1996). Enterpreneurship and the market process: an inquiry into the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Harper, D. (1998). Institutional conditions for entrepreneurship. Advances in Austrian Economics, 5, 241–275.
Hayek, F. A. (1952). The sensory order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1967a). The theory of complex phenomena. In his studies in philosophy, politics, and economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1967b). The corporation in a democratic society. in whose interest ought It to and will it be run? In his Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, volume i: rules and order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Horwitz, S. (2000). Microfoundations and macroeconomics: an austrian perspective. New York: Routledge.
Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koppl, R. (2000). Teaching complexity: an austrian approach. In D. Colander (ed.), The complexity vision and the teaching of economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Koppl, R. (2002a). Big players and the economic theory of expectations. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koppl, R. (2002b). Custom and rules: comments on ekkehart schlicht’s on custom in the economy. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(2), 531–537.
Koppl, R. (2005). Epistemic systems. Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology, 2(2), 91–106.
Koppl, R., & Rosser, J. B. Jr. (2002). All that i have to say has already crossed your mind. Metroeconomica, 53(4), 339–360.
Law, J. 1705 (1966). Money and trade considered, with a proposal for supplying the nation with money. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.
Lewin, P. (2000). The development of austrian economics: revisiting the neoclassical divide. Review of Austrian Economics, 14(4), 239–250.
Markose, S. M. (2005). Computability and evolutionary complexity: markets as complex adaptive systems (CAS). The Economic Journal, 115, F159–F192.
McCabe, K. (2005). Reciprocity and social order: what do experiments tell us about the failure of economic growth?” Review of Austrian Economics, 18(3–4), 241–280.
McCabe, K. (2003). Neuroeconomics, Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Lynn Nadel (ed-in chief), New York: Nature Publishing Group, Macmillan Publishing, (pp. 294–298).
McCabe, K., Daniel, H., Lee, R., Vernon, S., & Theodore, T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, 11832–11835.
Mulligan, R. F. (2004). Fractal analysis of highly volatile markets: an application to technology equities. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 44(1), 155–179.
Mulligan, R. F., & Lombardo, G. A. (2004). Maritime businesses: volatile stock prices and market valuation inefficiencies. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 44(2), 321–336.
O’Driscoll, G., & Mario, R. (1985). The economics of time and ignorance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Parsons, T. (1934). Some reflections on ‘The nature and significance of economics.’ Quarterly Journals of Economics, 48, 511–545.
Souter, R. W. (1933). The nature and significance of economic science’ in recent discussion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 47, 377–413.
Smith, V. (2003). Constructivist and ecological rationalithy in economics. American Economic Review, 93(3), 465–508.
Vaughn, K. I. (1994). Austrian economics in america: the migration of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vaughn, K. I. (1999). Hayek’s theory of the market order as an instance of the theory of complex, adaptive systems. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 9, 2–3.
Vanberg, V. (1994). Rules and choice in economics. London and New York: Routledge.
Velupillai, V. (2005). Computability, Complexity and Constructivity in Economic Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wohlgemuth, M. (2002). Evolutionary approaches to politics. Kyklos, 55(2), 223–246.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL Codes A14, B50, B53
This text is an edited version of a talk given in Washington, D.C. on 19 November 2005 at the SDAE annual dinner. I thank persons present at that time for a helpful discussion. I also thank William Butos, Roger Garrison, Steven Horwitz, and Peter Lewin for useful comments on an earlier draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koppl, R. Austrian economics at the cutting edge. Rev Austrian Econ 19, 231–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-9246-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-006-9246-y