Correction to: Neurochemical Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-022-03575-3

In the original online version of this article, the authors would like to issue the following corrections:

  1. 1.

    There should be a mark of “I/R” in Fig. 1a.

  2. 2.

    In Fig. 7a. The scale bar should be “50 μm” instead of “10 μm” in the merge column of the “I/R + EA” group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

T2w MRI imaging in different groups. a T2w MRI imag-ing indicated the infarct site and area(the red dotted area) in differ-ent groups. The orange contour area indicates the infarct site and area in the left hippocampus. b Infarct volume of the whole brain and the left hippocampus was quantified as a percentage of the total brain volume in each group. n = 6 per group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001; ns nonsignificant, EA electroacupuncture, I/R ischemia–reperfusion, Luz luzindole

Fig. 7
figure 2

EA inhibits microglial activation in the CA1 region of the left hippocampus. a Representative micrographs showing microglial activation in the CA1 area of the left hippocampus, with immuno-fluorescence for Iba-1 (×40). b, c Comparation between inactivated microglia activated microglia in the CA1 region of the left hippocampus (×100). d Quantification of Iba-1-positive cells. The group data are presented as the mean ± S.D (n = 6), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001; ns nonsignificant, EA electroacupuncture, I/R ischemia–reperfusion, Luz luzindole

The corrected Figs. 1 and 7 are given below.

Those changes do not affect the results of the study. We apologize to readers for those errors.