Abstract
PANoptosis, a burgeoning area of research, is a unique type of programmed cell death typified by pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis, yet it defies singular classification by any one mode of death. The assembly and activation of PANoptosomes are pivotal processes in PANoptosis, with several PANoptosomes already identified. Linkages between PANoptosis and the pathophysiology of various systemic illnesses are established, with increasing recognition of its association with oral ailments. This paper aims to deepen understanding by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the molecular pathways driving PANoptosis and exploring its potential implications in oral diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Oral diseases constitute a major global public health challenge. They significantly diminish patients’ quality of life by causing pain, difficulties in chewing, and aesthetic concerns, while also heightening the risk of systemic diseases. Moreover, oral diseases exert a considerable negative impact on the economy and healthcare systems worldwide [1,2,3]. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of common oral diseases deepens, accumulating evidence suggests that cell death plays a crucial role in their onset and progression. For example, in periodontitis, the inflammatory response triggers apoptosis in gingival tissues, accelerating gingival recession and periodontal tissue destruction [4, 5]. In the case of pulpitis, cell death exacerbates inflammation, leading to further tissue damage and intensified pain [6]. The development of oral cancer is associated with dysregulated apoptosis, where uncontrolled cancer cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis are key factors in tumor development [7]. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the complex role of cell death in oral diseases not only opens new avenues for the development of therapeutic strategies to slow disease progression but also offers novel scientific insights and approaches for the prevention and treatment of clinical oral conditions.
Cell death is a vital process throughout life, essential for embryonic development, maintaining homeostasis, and eliminating damaged cells. It occurs in two distinct forms: accidental cell death (ACD) and regulated cell death (RCD). ACD is unregulated and typically results from mechanical, chemical, or physical insults. In contrast, RCD is a controlled process governed by intracellular signaling cascades that help maintain homeostasis. A subtype of RCD that occurs naturally under physiological conditions is known as programmed cell death (PCD) [8]. The intrinsic immune system can initiate PCD by detecting pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), thus contributing to the dynamic maintenance of organismal homeostasis [9]. PCD has been extensively studied, with apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis being the three most commonly recognized mechanisms [10] (Fig. 1).
Apoptosis, the first extensively studied type of PCD, was proposed in 1972 and was long considered the only regulated process of cellular demise [11, 12]. This non-lytic form of cell death is characterized by several features, including intact cell membranes, cellular shrinkage, chromatin condensation, karyorrhexis, and plasma membrane blebbing [13]. Apoptosis can be triggered via three distinct pathways: the intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway, the extrinsic (death receptor) pathway, and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway. The intrinsic pathway is typically initiated by intracellular disturbances in homeostasis, often due to cytotoxic chemicals or DNA damage, leading to the upregulation of BH3-only proteins. These proteins bind tightly to BCL-2, releasing BAX and BAK to form oligomeric structures that cause mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). This event releases cytochrome c from the mitochondria, which then forms apoptosomes in conjunction with apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (APAF-1). The apoptosome activates the initiator caspase-9, which in turn activates caspases-3 and − 7, ultimately executing apoptosis [11, 13, 14]. The extrinsic pathway is initiated by the activation of cell surface death receptors in response to external signals. Upon activation, these receptors—including Fas, TNFR1, DR3, DR4, DR5, and DR6—oligomerize and recruit adaptor proteins with death domains, such as FADD and TRADD. This recruitment activates the initiator caspase-8, leading to the activation of caspases-3 and caspase-7, which execute apoptosis [11, 13, 15]. The ER stress pathway is activated by stressors such as misfolded proteins within the ER. Activation of ER stress-inducing molecules, including IRE1, PERK, and ATF6, elevates the expression of CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein) and alters other apoptosis-related markers, ultimately activating caspases and initiating cell death [16,17,18].
Pyroptosis, an inflammatory form of PCD associated with innate immunity, can be divided into two categories: the canonical and non-canonical signaling pathways. The canonical pathway operates through caspase-1, while the non-canonical pathway functions through caspases-4, -5, and − 11 [19]. In the canonical pathway, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC) is recruited by inflammasome sensors such as NLRP3, NLRC4, AIM2, and Pyrin in response to specific stimuli, forming a platform for caspase-1 activation [20]. Activated caspase-1 cleaves Gasdermin D (GSDMD), leading to cell membrane disruption and cell death. To amplify the inflammatory response, caspase-1 also converts pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into their active forms, releasing them into the extracellular matrix [20]. In contrast, in the non-canonical pathway, pyroptosis is triggered when caspases-4, -5, or -11 directly bind to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), leading to their oligomerization, activation, and subsequent cleavage of GSDMD, which creates pores in the cell membrane [21].
Necroptosis, a lytic form of PCD, is induced by certain death receptors, including TNFR and Fas, as well as TLR3 and TLR4, particularly when caspase activation is inhibited [22]. The initiation and regulation of necroptosis primarily involve tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), caspase-8, receptor-interacting protein kinases 1 and 3 (RIPK1 and RIPK3), and the mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) [23]. Upon TNFR1 activation, RIPK1 interacts with RIPK3 to form necrosomes through the RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM). This interaction leads to the autophosphorylation of RIPK3, which subsequently activates MLKL. The activation of MLKL induces structural changes that enable it to translocate to the cell membrane, where it triggers membrane permeabilization and ultimately necroptosis [24]. Additionally, TLR3 and TLR4 can directly initiate necroptosis through the interaction of TRIF with RIPK via the RHIM [25].
Extensive research has explored the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis. Recent findings indicate that these pathways exhibit a degree of crosstalk, suggesting they are not entirely independent [13]. In 2019, the term “PANoptosis,” representing pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis, was introduced [26]. PANoptosis is an inflammatory form of cell death regulated by the PANoptosome and is characterized by the simultaneous activation of these three pathways. It is not possible to ascribe this phenomenon to any single mechanism [27]. PANoptosis has been shown to play a significant role in tumorigenesis, pathogenic microbial infections, autoimmune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and other conditions.
To date, no comprehensive review has systematically addressed the role of PANoptosis in oral diseases. This paper aims to examine the molecular basis of PANoptosis and explore its manifestation in various oral conditions.
PANoptosome
The PANoptosome, a complex of proteins involved in apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, mediates PANoptosis, which is often triggered by specific stimuli. Different triggers activate distinct sensors and regulators within PANoptosomes. Several types of PANoptosomes have been identified, each characterized by a unique composition of proteins. As a result, the cellular events leading to cell death may differ depending on the protein composition of these complexes. (Fig. 2)
Composition
The structure of the PANoptosome, similar to the inflammasome, typically consists of three components: (1) PAMP and DAMP sensors, such as NLRP3, NLRC4, ZBP1, AIM2, and Pyrin; (2) adaptors, including ASC and FADD; and (3) catalytic effectors, such as caspase-8, -1, -3, -6, RHIM domain-containing proteins like RIPK1 and RIPK3, pore-forming proteins GSDMD and GSDME, and mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) [27,28,29]. The PANoptosis signaling cascade usually begins when sensor proteins detect endogenous or exogenous danger signals. Adaptor proteins then transmit these signals to effector proteins, thereby initiating PANoptosis [30]. The proteins that constitute the PANoptosome have been extensively studied.
Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1)
ZBP1 is a protein that binds to both Z-DNA and Z-RNA. It possesses two N-terminal Z nucleic acid structural domains (Zα1 and Zα2) and two RIP homotypic interaction motifs (RHIM1 and RHIM2) [31]. Initially identified as an innate immune sensor, ZBP1 activates NF-κB signaling and IFN-I responses to combat pathogen infections [32, 33]. Recent studies have shown that ZBP1 plays a crucial role in regulating PANoptosis and acts as a key regulator in the assembly of the PANoptosome [26], which detects influenza A virus (IAV) infection and subsequently promotes the activation of RIPK3 and caspase-8 [34].
The Zα2 structural domain of ZBP1 is responsible for specifically recognizing and binding to activating ligands, including viruses and endogenous Z-RNAs. This interaction enables binding with the RHIM structural domains of RIPK3 and RIPK1, which together form the core framework of the PANoptosome. Within this framework, RIPK3 is crucial for promoting MLKL phosphorylation and its transmembrane translocation, processes that lead to necrosome formation and subsequent necroptosis. Meanwhile, RIPK1 triggers apoptosis by activating caspase-8 and caspase-3/-7 through its interaction with FADD. Additionally, the ZBP1-PANoptosome facilitates the assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to GSDMD cleavage, IL-1β and IL-18 maturation, and ultimately pyroptosis [35].
Transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1)
TAK1 is a serine/threonine kinase that belongs to the MAPK kinase kinase (MAPKKK) family. Initially identified as a crucial mediator in transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) signaling, TAK1 has since been shown to be activated by various stimuli. This activation leads to the phosphorylation of multiple target proteins, thereby regulating signaling pathways and cellular responses under diverse stress conditions and in different cell types [36].
TAK1 functions as a master regulator of PANoptosis quiescence. It prevents the assembly of the RIPK1-RIPK3-FADD-caspase-8 complex by inhibiting RIPK1 kinase activity, thereby avoiding PANoptosis. When TAK1 function is inhibited, this complex assembles, triggering a cascade of processes, including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis. Impaired TAK1 function leads to excessive activation of PANoptosis, potentially contributing to the development of inflammatory diseases [26, 37].
Fas-associated death domain (FADD)
FADD functions as an adaptor protein activated through interactions with either TNFR1 or active RIPK1. This activation is essential for binding and activating caspase-8 [38, 39]. As a component of the PANoptosome, FADD plays a crucial role in apoptosis and necroptosis. In the apoptosis regulatory mechanism, the death domain (DD) of FADD interacts with the death effector domain (DED) of caspase-8 to assemble the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC). This complex promotes the oligomerization and autocatalytic activation of caspase-8, which then initiates a cascade of events leading to the cleavage of substrate proteins, such as PARP and caspase-3, and ultimately results in apoptosis [40]. FADD/caspase-8-mediated proteolytic cleavage of RIPK1 has been shown to inhibit necroptosis induced by TNFR1 ligation, as RIPK1 is necessary for RIPK3 activation in this context [41].
The activation of inflammasomes in macrophages has been shown to depend on FADD [42]. Additionally, ASC cannot oligomerize without FADD or caspase-8, demonstrating that both FADD and caspase-8 are essential for ASC oligomerization in macrophages [43]. These findings collectively highlight the significant role of FADD in cell death.
Caspase-6
Caspase-6 is a protease from the caspase family that plays a crucial role in mediating cell death. It is a key regulator in PANoptosis, a process involved in the cross-regulation of the three cell death pathways: pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis.
In pyroptosis, caspase-6 plays a crucial role in regulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation and GSDMD cleavage. In an influenza A virus (IAV) infection model, caspase-6 deletion resulted in decreased GSDMD and caspase-1 cleavage, leading to reduced IL-1β and IL-18 release and inhibition of pyroptosis [44]. During apoptosis, caspase-6 is activated and initiates the cleavage of various transcription factors, including nuclear factor (NF)-κB, adenine-thymine sequence-rich binding protein 1, and structural proteins, resulting in nuclear atrophy and chromosomal DNA fragmentation [44,45,46]. Additionally, caspase-6 cleaves both large and small subunits, forming active dimers that target apoptosis-related substrates such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and lamin A, thus inducing cell death [44]. Caspase-6 can also be activated by caspase-3/-7, leading to the cleavage of caspase-8, which in turn modulates caspase-3/-7 activation and promotes apoptosis [47, 48]. Regarding necroptosis, caspase-6 exhibits a dual role: it can inhibit necroptosis by cleaving RIPK1 and potentially facilitate necroptosis by promoting RIPK3 binding to ZBP1 [49, 50]. Thus, caspase-6 plays a multifaceted and critical role in regulating various cell death pathways.
Caspase-8
Caspase-8, a protease in the caspase family, plays a critical role in regulating PANoptosis. Its function is broad, involving multiple signaling pathways and protein interactions. In apoptosis, caspase-8 is crucial for both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. In the extrinsic pathway, caspase-8 forms a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) with FADD and procaspase-8, which activates downstream effectors caspase-3 and caspase-7, leading to apoptosis [51]. In the intrinsic pathway, caspase-8 contributes to apoptosis by cleaving Bid proteins, thus activating the mitochondrial pathway [52, 53]. In pyroptosis, caspase-8 can induce this process by acting upstream of caspase-3 or by directly cleaving GSDMD or GSDME [54, 55]. Additionally, in the presence of caspase-1, caspase-8 synergizes with ASC proteins to assemble and activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, ultimately leading to pyroptosis [26, 56]. Caspase-8 also forms the Ripoptosome with RIPK1 and cFLIP, regulating RIPK3 activity and influencing necroptosis [51]. However, when the Ripoptosome recruits p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) and phosphorylates caspase-8, it can negate caspase-8’s inhibitory effect on necroptosis, thereby facilitating necroptosis [57].
In summary, caspase-8 regulates cell death by modulating the activity and expression of key proteins through various signaling pathways, thereby influencing apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis.
ZBP1-PANoptosome
The Zα structural domain of ZBP1 functions as a key innate immune sensor for Z-RNA, which is produced by DNA and RNA viruses [58]. Further research on influenza A virus (IAV) infection and cellular death has underscored ZBP1’s role as a critical upstream sensor in the defense against IAV-induced cell death [26]. The structural configuration of ZBP1 enables it to regulate PANoptosome assembly and initiate PANoptosis upon IAV infection. Studies have demonstrated that deletion of the Zα2 domain of ZBP1 impairs PANoptosis and inflammation caused by IAV infections [59, 60]. Additionally, the presence of the RHIM domain allows ZBP1 to interact with other RHIM-containing proteins, including RIPK1 and RIPK3 [33].
Upon activation, ZBP1 forms a cell death signaling scaffold through protein-protein interactions and the recruitment of associated proteins, including RIPK1, RIPK3, MLKL, FADD, caspase-1, caspase-6, caspase-8, NLRP3, and ASC. This ZBP1-PANoptosome complex stimulates kinase and protein hydrolysis signaling pathways, leading to inflammation and the initiation of PANoptosis [28, 31, 61]. Necroptosis is initiated when RIPK3 recruits and phosphorylates MLKL to form necrosomes, a process dependent on kinase activity [34, 62]. Extrinsic apoptosis is triggered by RIPK1 binding to FADD via the death domain (DD), which then interacts with caspase-8 to activate and cleave the executioner caspases, -3 and − 7 [63, 64]. Additionally, GSDMD cleavage and the production of IL-1β and IL-18 are associated with the activation of the ZBP1-NLRP3 inflammasome, which induces pyroptosis [31, 65].
In conclusion, research has demonstrated that the ZBP1-PANoptosome orchestrates pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis. Deletion of individual cell death effector molecules does not significantly protect against IAV-induced cell death. However, knockdown of ZBP1 or simultaneous loss of key PANoptosome components, such as RIPK3 and caspase-8, can prevent the onset of PANoptosis [31].
AIM2-PANoptosome
AIM2 is a sensor for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) that recognizes a variety of microbes. It plays a crucial role in the treatment of tumors, inflammatory diseases, and infections [66,67,68]. This study demonstrates that during infections with herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) and Francisella novicida, AIM2 regulates Pyrin and ZBP1 to enhance inflammation and initiate PANoptosis in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) [69].
Independently of NLRP3/NLRC4, infection with HSV-1 or F. novicida triggers AIM2-dependent caspase-1 cleavage, leading to the production of IL-1β and IL-18 and resulting in cell death through an inflammasome-related mechanism. In contrast, Mefv−/− and ZBP1−/− BMDMs exhibit reduced inflammasome activation and diminished cell death following infection. This suggests that Pyrin and ZBP1 are integral to the AIM2-mediated cell death pathway induced by HSV-1 and F. novicida infections. Additionally, studies have shown decreased activity of caspase-1, GSDMD, GSDME, caspase-8, caspase-3, caspase-7, RIPK3, and MLKL in Mefv−/− and ZBP1−/− BMDMs after infection, with activity being completely absent in AIM2−/− and Mefv−/−ZBP1−/− BMDMs. These findings indicate that Pyrin and ZBP1 work together to facilitate AIM2-mediated PANoptosis in the context of HSV-1 and F. novicida infections [69].
In conclusion, infection with F. novicida or HSV-1 activates AIM2, leading to the assembly of PANoptosomes. These complexes, consisting of AIM2, Pyrin, ZBP1, and other components such as FADD, RIPK3, RIPK1, ASC, caspase-1, and caspase-8, trigger PANoptosis. This process provides a protective response for the host [69].
RIPK1-PANoptosome
An important regulator of the NLRP3 inflammasome is transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1). TAK1 deficiency causes spontaneous activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome independent of RIPK1, leading to PANoptosis, which includes pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis [37, 70]. The effector protein Yop J, produced by Yersinia infection, inhibits TAK1, disrupting cellular homeostasis and triggering programmed cell death pathways [71,72,73]. In Yersinia-infected BMDMs, multiple PCD pathways are activated, as evidenced by the activation of caspase-1, -3, -7, and − 8, GSDMD cleavage, and MLKL phosphorylation. Immunoprecipitation studies reveal the formation of a complex involving RIPK1, RIPK3, caspase-8, ASC, FADD, and NLRP3 during infection, termed the RIPK1-PANoptosome [71].
The absence of RIPK1 does not completely inhibit the initiation of cellular death pathways but rather diminishes cell death, underscoring its distinct role in regulating PANoptosis compared to ZBP1 and AIM2. Deletion of RIPK1 results in reduced pyroptosis and apoptosis while enhancing necroptosis [71]. This phenomenon may be attributed to the activation of different necroptotic pathways depending on the presence or absence of RIPK1. Previous studies indicate that necroptosis induced by RIPK1 deletion is dependent on ZBP1 [74, 75], whereas necroptosis induced by Yersinia in normal cells is independent of ZBP1 [71].
The findings indicate that RIPK1 is a critical component of Yersinia-induced PANoptosis, and TAK1 may serve as an upstream regulator in the assembly and activation of the RIPK1-PANoptosome.
NLRP12-PANoptosome
NLRP12 is a recently identified cytoplasmic innate immune sensor that recognizes heme and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). It activates inflammasomes, facilitates the assembly of PANoptosomes, and triggers inflammatory responses and cell death. Toll-like receptors TLR2 and TLR4 upregulate NLRP12 expression through the interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1)-mediated signaling pathway, leading to inflammasome production and the subsequent release of IL-1β and IL-18. These inflammasomes, part of the NLRP12-PANoptosome complex, drive PANoptosis via caspase-8 and RIPK3 activation [76, 77].
PANoptosis in oral diseases
The study of programmed cell death (PCD) has become a significant focus in oral disease research, especially with the identification of PANoptosis, a newly recognized form of cell death. The role of PANoptosis in the pathogenesis of oral diseases has garnered increasing attention, with evidence suggesting its involvement in the development of various common oral conditions (Fig. 3)
Oropharyngeal candidiasis.
Candida albicans (C. albicans) typically colonizes the oral cavity asymptomatically, as well as the vaginal mucosa and gastrointestinal tract [78]. However, it can become pathogenic and induce illness when the host’s immune system is compromised or the normal flora is disturbed. In the oral cavity, C. albicans infections commonly manifest as oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC), which is particularly prevalent among newborns, young children, the elderly, individuals misusing antibiotics, and patients undergoing radiation therapy. Furthermore, C. albicans has been identified as a pathogenic microorganism in various oral Additionally, C. albicans has been implicated as a pathogen in various oral diseases affecting immunocompetent individuals, including denture stomatitis (DS), early childhood caries, periodontitis, and endodontic lesions [79]. Consequently, C. albicans plays a significant role in oral microecology.
Recent studies have demonstrated that C. albicans infection elicits inflammasome activation and PANoptosis. A dose-dependent elevation in the protein levels of apoptosis-associated factors (caspase-8, -3, -7), pyroptosis mediators (caspase-1, GSDMD), and necroptosis markers (pMLKL) suggests that PANoptosis is induced by C. albicans infection [59]. The underlying mechanisms of PANoptosis have garnered increasing research interest. ZBP1 is identified as one of the receptors that trigger PANoptosis [31]. The study revealed that PANoptosis-related proteins were diminished n ZBP1−/− and ZBP1ΔZα2/ΔZα2 BMDMs subsequent to C. albicans infection, as compared to wild-type (WT) BMDMs. This finding indicates that the Zα2 domain of ZBP1 is crucial for the detection of C. albicans, thereby initiating subsequent signaling cascades. Comparable outcomes were also noted in caspase-1/-11−/−RIPK3−/−caspase-8−/− BMDMs, emphasizing their significant role in C. albicans-induced PANoptosis [59].
The ablation of ZBP1, RIPK3, and caspase-8 in IAV-induced PANoptosis is significant, as it impedes both inflammasome activation and cell death. However, their deletion leads to a mere reduction in inflammasome activation and cell death following C. albicans invasion [59]. It is plausible that C. albicans infection engages alternative cell death pathways or additional PANoptosome components, necessitating further investigation to substantiate this hypothesis.
Herpetic gingivostomatitis
The herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a double-stranded DNA virus encompassing two serotypes: HSV-1 and HSV-2 [80]. HSV-1 is a widespread viral infection globally, mainly transmitted through direct contact with bodily fluids harboring the virus [81]. In addition to causing herpetic gingivostomatitis, HSV-1 infection can lead to recurrent herpetic stomatitis by establishing a latent infection within sensory neurons, persisting for the host’s lifetime [82, 83].
Recent research indicates that AIM2 regulates the innate immune receptors Pyrin and ZBP1 to prevent HSV-1 infection by modulating the inflammatory signaling cascade and inducing inflammatory cell death, including PANoptosis. HSV-1 activates AIM2 by binding to the Zα2 domain of ZBP1 and inhibiting RhoA-GTP activity, which leads to the activation of Pyrin. Subsequently, Pyrin and ZBP1 work together to facilitate the assembly of the AIM2-PANoptosome, a molecular complex composed of AIM2, ASC, caspase-1, caspase-8, RIPK3, RIPK1, and FADD, which triggers PANoptosis [69].
The regulatory system elucidates how HSV-1 infection affects the host’s innate immunity and coordinates the initiation of cell death signals. This process involves the formation of multiprotein complexes that lead to inflammatory cell death and cytokine release, thereby defining the molecular mechanisms underlying both host defense and the immune response.
Periodontitis
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder arising from the interplay between microbial communities in dental biofilm and the host’s immune response, which leads to the progressive degradation of periodontal support tissues. According to a 2021 guideline issued by the World Health Organization (WHO), severe periodontal disease has emerged as the primary cause of tooth loss [84]. Bacteria residing in the periodontal pocket can elicit an immune response, precipitating gingival inflammation, pocket formation, attachment loss, and alveolar bone resorption, ultimately resulting in oral dysfunction and tooth loss [85, 86]. Early studies have associated several bacterial species, including Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythia), and Treponema denticola (T. denticola), with periodontal disease. These bacteria, collectively known as the ‘red complex’, congregate at the site of infection and are strongly associated with periodontitis [87]. Furthermore, P. gingivalis is the predominant pathogen linked to chronic periodontitis and its detection is correlated with the recurrence and exacerbation of periodontitis following treatment [88].
During P. gingivalis infection, the bacterium initially invades gingival epithelial cells and compromises the epithelial barrier, triggering the recruitment of inflammatory cells that secrete inflammatory mediators, degrade extracellular matrix and tissue structures, and ultimately induce cell death. Concurrently, P. gingivalis can engage with the host’s defenses and disrupt them, causing dysregulation of the host’s innate immune system and exaggerated inflammatory responses. This enables the bacterium to evade immune detection and extend its survival within the host, thereby exerting its pathogenic influence [89]. Consequently, examining cell death in the context of periodontitis is vital for comprehending the disease’s pathogenesis and developing effective treatments.
The progression of periodontitis is influenced by the roles of fibroblasts, stem cells, and macrophages. Macrophages play a pivotal role in the innate immune response to periodontal pathogens throughout the chronic evolution of periodontitis [90, 91]. Within the periodontal connective tissue, fibroblasts, including gingival fibroblasts (GFs) and periodontal fibroblasts (PDLFs), are the predominant cell type. Stem cells are crucial for tissue regeneration and repair, as they have the capacity to differentiate into a wide array of cell types. Numerous studies have shown that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation by P. gingivalis leads to significant upregulation of key proteins associated with apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in macrophages, fibroblasts, and stem cells, including Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-1, caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-8, GSDMD, NLRP3, ASC, MLKL, and the cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 [92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103], indicating that the development of periodontitis may involve PANoptosis. Furthermore, investigations into periodontal tissues and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) from individuals with periodontitis have revealed that inflamed gingival tissues or GCF exhibit heightened expressions of GSDMD, NLRP3, caspase-1, caspase-3, Bcl-2, Bax, MLKL, and IL-1β [4, 99, 100, 102, 104,105,106,107], which further corroborates the hypothesis. Moreover, components of the PANoptosome have been identified in the majority of these studies.
The experimental evidence collectively suggests a plausible link between PANoptosis and the initiation of periodontitis. Although there is a dearth of specific research on whether PANoptosome assembly occurs in periodontitis, the current data suggest that PANoptosome component proteins are overexpressed in the disease, which may serve as a molecular rationale for the occurrence of PANoptosis during periodontal injury. Further experiments are necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that drive PANoptosis in periodontitis.
Caries
Dental caries is a multifactorial, chronic, and destructive disease prevalent in the human oral cavity. It is primarily caused by the consumption of carbohydrates, which are metabolized by oral microorganisms to produce acids, leading to the sustained demineralization of dental hard tissues. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that PANoptosis contributes to the caries process, and existing studies on this topic are inadequate. Therefore, further research is warranted.
Pulpitis and apical periodontitis
Pulpitis and apical periodontitis (AP) are prevalent inflammatory dental conditions resulting from microbial infections. The pulp and periapical tissues are typically sterile; however, dental injuries can permit microbial entry into the root canal through dentinal tubules or exposed pulp, leading to pulpitis. Subsequently, microbial migration through the apical foramen can result in apical periodontitis. Bacteria are the primary agents responsible for pulp and periapical diseases, with root canal bacteria predominantly comprising obligate anaerobic species organized into biofilms [108, 109]. Studies have identified Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Fusobacterium, Parvimonas, and Streptococcus as the most commonly detected bacteria within endodontic infections [110]. Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) is commonly found in infected root canals of teeth with AP due to its potent pro-inflammatory properties [111,112,113]. Moreover, Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is frequently present in infected root canals of teeth experiencing failed pulp therapy and refractory AP, highlighting its significance as a key microorganism in persistent and recurrent endodontic infections [114, 115].
F. Nucleatum-induced PANoptosis in macrophages
Researchers observed a substantial infiltration and accumulation of macrophages in the infected periapical tissues, accompanied by the presence of large clusters of F. nucleatum. With the progression of the infection, the death of macrophages increased steadily. This finding suggests that the antimicrobial response of macrophages following F. nucleatum infection is associated with the initiation of a complex inflammatory response, which ultimately leads to tissue damage. Moreover, the loss of these cells plays a pivotal role in the progression of the disease [116].
Experimental data indicate that macrophages infected with F. nucleatum exhibit an upregulation of ZBP1, N-GSDME, caspase-3, and pMLKL over time, with macrophage death being observed 24 h post-infection. Additionally, the expression of N-GSDME, caspase-3, and pMLKL was significantly reduced following ZBP1 knockdown after F. nucleatum infection. These observations suggest that F. nucleatum infection activates ZBP1, leading to the establishment of a hybrid cell death pathway known as PANoptosis [116].
To corroborate these findings, the researchers analyzed tissue samples from both apical periodontitis and healthy tissues independently. They observed markedly increased expression levels of N-GSDME, caspase-3, and pMLKL in the apical periodontitis samples, thereby confirming the presence of PANoptosis in this condition [116].
E. faecalis induces PANoptosis in osteoblasts
A defining feature of apical periodontitis is the progressive destruction of bone. Following root canal therapy, the healing of apical lesions is often associated with osteoblast-driven bone regeneration. Consequently, under normal physiological conditions, the activity and abundance of osteoblasts are pivotal for the restoration of periapical lesions.
Research indicates that E. faecalis induces both pyroptosis and apoptosis in human MG-63 osteoblastic cells. This effect was notably attenuated by NLRP3 knockdown using siRNA, suggesting that NLRP3 is a critical component involved in the regulation of apoptosis and pyroptosis in MG63 cells during E. faecalis infection [117]. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that NLRP3, caspase-1, and IL-1β were significantly upregulated in periapical tissues compared to normal tissues [118], which further corroborates E. faecalis’s ability to induce osteoclast apoptosis and pyroptosis. Extensive recent research into programmed cell death (PCD) has led to the discovery that E. faecalis may also trigger necroptosis in MG63 cells through the RIPK3/MLKL signaling pathway [119].
The present findings imply that E. faecalis might induce osteoblasts to undergo PANoptosis. However, conclusive experiments demonstrating the occurrence of PANoptosis in osteoblasts induced by E. faecalis are currently unavailable. Further studies are required to delineate the downstream mechanisms of PANoptosome assembly and to identify the receptors involved in the response to E. faecalis.
Space infection with cranio-maxillofacial region
The oral and maxillofacial region is naturally inhabited by a multitude of microorganisms. Under conditions such as trauma, surgery, or reduced systemic immunity, this region is susceptible to infections, both endogenous and exogenous, which can disrupt the equilibrium of the normal microbial flora. The area’s abundant vascular network and extensive network of interconnected fascial spaces facilitate the rapid dissemination of infections, potentially leading to life-threatening complications in severe cases. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a clinically important pathogen known for causing a wide spectrum of human infections. It is a part of the normal skin microbiota in both animals and humans, with a prevalence ranging from 20 to 30% in healthy populations [120]. S. aureus is also among the most common bacteria associated with oral and maxillofacial infections. The most recent research suggests that S. aureus can induce host cell death during infection through the action of its virulence factors, which include apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis [121,122,123].
S. aureus triggers apoptosis in host cells during infection through a plethora of mechanisms that are integral to its pathogenic processes. The apoptosis of host immune cells may exacerbate the infection caused by S. aureus, while the apoptosis of tissue cells may impede the production of cytokines and the differentiation of T cells, thus diminishing the immune response [123]. S. aureus can induce apoptosis by activating FADD, RIPK3, and caspase-3/-8 through various cellular components or secreted virulence factors [123,124,125]. In the context of oral and maxillofacial infections, the role of S. aureus-derived staphylococcal protein A (SpA) in the pathogenesis of osteomyelitis has been noted, with apoptosis being a consequence [123, 126]. Furthermore, S. aureus has been shown to elicit pyroptosis in host cells through a variety of mechanisms, leading to cell death and the initiation of an inflammatory response. The bacterium can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, triggering pyroptosis of macrophage-like cells (MAC-T cells) through the potassium efflux pathway [127, 128]. Evidence indicates that S. aureus-related PAMPs, including lipoteichoic acid (LTA), triacylated and diacylated lipoproteins, and peptidoglycan (PGN), along with toxins, enzymes, and effectors such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), α-hemolysin (Hla), β-hemolysin (Hlb), and γ-hemolysin (Hlg), can induce pyroptosis [122, 123, 129,130,131]. Moreover, PVL, Hla, and phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) have been observed to induce necroptosis in host cells following S. aureus infection [122, 123, 132]. Phagocytosis of S. aureus has been demonstrated to induce necroptosis in neutrophils. Conversely, when bacterial adhesion and entry into non-phagocytic cells are recognized by homologous host receptors, necroptosis can be triggered through the intrinsic pathway, leading to mitochondrial damage, or through the extrinsic pathway, involving cell surface receptors [122, 133,134,135].
Although S. aureus has been demonstrated to elicit apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, its precise pathogenesis in oral and maxillofacial infections remains largely unexplored, and the question of whether it initiates PANoptosis remains uncertain. Therefore, there is an urgent need for further research to clarify the associated pathological mechanisms.
Tumors
Oral and maxillofacial neoplasms are significant diseases that can lead to severe health complications. Their development is a multifaceted, multistage biological process, and tumor cells are renowned for their resistance to cell death [136]. PANoptosis presents an alternative cell death mechanism that could circumvent this resistance, potentially offering novel strategies for cancer treatment. Although PANoptosis has been extensively investigated in vitro and in mouse models, its applicability to tumors is still a matter of debate. For example, in skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM), high expression of PANoptosis-related proteins, such as ZBP1, NLRP1, caspase-8, and GSDMD, is associated with a favorable prognosis. Conversely, in low-grade glioma (LGG), high expression of ZBP1, ADAR, caspase-2, caspase-3, caspase-4, caspase-8, and GSDMD is associated with a poorer prognosis [137].
Nevertheless, the therapeutic potential of PANoptosis in inhibiting or combating tumor growth is gaining increasing recognition. Certain drug combinations, such as interferon (IFN) and nuclear export inhibitors (NEI) or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), have demonstrated anticancer effects [138, 139]. Elevated expression of ADAR1 inhibits the interaction between ZBP1 and RIPK3, thereby suppressing PANoptosis and fostering tumor progression. However, the combination of IFN and NEI has been found to alter the association between ADAR1 and ZBP1. In a melanoma model, this drug cocktail notably diminished tumor size, indicating its promise as an anti-cancer approach [138]. Furthermore, TNF-α and IFN-γ have been demonstrated to collaborate in inducing PANoptosis, leading to cancer cell death and inhibiting tumor growth [139].
In conclusion, compounds that elicit PANoptosis show immense potential in cancer therapy. The function and therapeutic potential of PANoptosis in oral and maxillofacial cancers are still not fully understood, indicating the necessity for further research in this field.
Summary and perspectives
The innate immune system’s capacity to orchestrate cell death is crucial for embryonic development, autoinflammatory disorders, host defense mechanisms, and maintaining organismal homeostasis. PANoptosis, recently recognized as a form of programmed cell death (PCD), is implicated in a spectrum of conditions and demonstrates a multifaceted regulatory network. It is thought to contribute to a range of viral and inflammatory diseases, as well as tumorigenesis, underscoring the significance of comprehending its role in disease pathogenesis for the development of effective management and treatment strategies. The PANoptosome, a pivotal mediator in the PANoptosis cascade, comprises molecules integral to other PCD pathways, such as inflammasomes, the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), apoptosomes, and necrosomes. Its distinctive characteristics include the assembly and simultaneous activation of multiple signaling pathways associated with cell death. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of PANoptosome assembly is instrumental in elucidating how they govern disease progression.
This paper systematically examines the concept and molecular processes of PANoptosis and summarizes its involvement in various oral diseases. It highlights PANoptosis’ dual role in disease development: while it is crucial for combating microbial infections and maintaining immune homeostasis, it can also lead to excessive cytokine production, which may damage host tissues and trigger cytokine storms [140, 141] (Fig. 4) High cytokine levels are associated with multi-organ failure and lung damage [142,143,144]. Therefore, understanding the effects of PANoptosis on the host and various pathogens, and developing novel drugs that either enhance or inhibit PANoptosis, could be promising for disease treatment.
Overall, the significance of PANoptosis in various diseases, including oral diseases, has been well established, highlighting its potential for treating a broad range of conditions. However, several questions remain unanswered in PANoptosis research. For example, the precise mechanisms underlying PANoptosis are still unclear, and further research is needed to identify additional key factors within the PANoptosome. Moreover, the specific inducers and inhibitors of PANoptosis require investigation. Significant gaps also exist in understanding PANoptosis in the context of oral diseases, underscoring the need for more evidence to clarify its role in these conditions. Advancing novel molecular treatments for oral diseases necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms and regulation involved in PANoptosis.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Peres MA et al (2019) Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet 394(10194):249–260
Bernabe E et al (2020) Global, Regional, and national levels and trends in Burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease 2017 study. J Dent Res 99(4):362–373
Schierz O, Baba K, Fueki K (2021) Functional oral health-related quality of life impact: a systematic review in populations with tooth loss. J Oral Rehabil 48(3):256–270
Listyarifah D et al (2017) Infection and apoptosis associated with inflammation in periodontitis: an immunohistologic study. Oral Dis 23(8):1144–1154
Dabiri D et al (2016) The role of apoptotic factors in assessing progression of Periodontal Disease. Int J Dent Oral Sci 3(9):318–325
Huang M et al (2020) Regulated cell death in Pulpitis. J Endod 46(10):1403–1413
He S, Chakraborty R, Ranganathan S (2022) Proliferation and apoptosis pathways and factors in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci, 23(3)
Tang D et al (2019) The molecular machinery of regulated cell death. Cell Res 29(5):347–364
Kanneganti TD (2020) Intracellular innate immune receptors: life inside the cell. Immunol Rev 297(1):5–12
Green DR (2019) The coming decade of cell death research: five riddles. Cell 177(5):1094–1107
Bertheloot D, Latz E, Franklin BS (2021) Necroptosis, pyroptosis and apoptosis: an intricate game of cell death. Cell Mol Immunol 18(5):1106–1121
Nössing C, Ryan KM (2023) 50 years on and still very much alive: ‘Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics’. Br J Cancer 128(3):426–431
Lee E et al (2023) Regulated cell death pathways and their roles in homeostasis, infection, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Exp Mol Med 55(8):1632–1643
Bedoui S, Herold MJ, Strasser A (2020) Emerging connectivity of programmed cell death pathways and its physiological implications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21(11):678–695
Cavalcante GC et al (2019) A Cell’s Fate: An Overview of the Molecular Biology and Genetics of Apoptosis. Int J Mol Sci, 20(17)
Panganiban RA et al (2019) Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies suppressors of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(27):13384–13393
Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ (2020) Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21(8):421–438
Yap KN et al (2021) Evaluating endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response through the lens of ecology and evolution. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 96(2):541–556
de Vasconcelos NM, Lamkanfi M (2020) Recent insights on inflammasomes, Gasdermin Pores, and Pyroptosis, vol 12. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 5
Karki R, Kanneganti TD (2019) Diverging inflammasome signals in tumorigenesis and potential targeting. Nat Rev Cancer 19(4):197–214
Rathinam VAK, Zhao Y, Shao F (2019) Innate immunity to intracellular LPS. Nat Immunol 20(5):527–533
Yan J et al (2022) Necroptosis and tumor progression. Trends Cancer 8(1):21–27
Xu D, Zou C, Yuan J (2021) Genetic regulation of RIPK1 and Necroptosis. Annu Rev Genet 55:235–263
Someda M et al (2020) Caspase-8, receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), and RIPK3 regulate retinoic acid-induced cell differentiation and necroptosis. Cell Death Differ 27(5):1539–1553
Baker MODG et al (2022) The RHIM of the Immune adaptor protein TRIF forms Hybrid amyloids with other Necroptosis-Associated proteins. Molecules 27(11):3382
Malireddi RKS, Kesavardhana S, Kanneganti TD (2019) ZBP1 and TAK1: Master regulators of NLRP3 Inflammasome/Pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PAN-optosis). Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:406
Samir P, Malireddi RKS, Kanneganti TD (2020) The PANoptosome: a deadly protein complex driving pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:238
Christgen S et al (2020) Identification of the PANoptosome: a molecular platform triggering pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:237
Christgen S, Tweedell RE, Kanneganti TD (2022) Programming inflammatory cell death for therapy. Pharmacol Ther 232:108010
Xiong Y (2023) The emerging role of PANoptosis in cancer treatment. Biomed Pharmacother 168:115696
Zheng M, Kanneganti TD (2020) The regulation of the ZBP1-NLRP3 inflammasome and its implications in pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Immunol Rev 297(1):26–38
Hao Y et al (2022) ZBP1: a powerful Innate Immune Sensor and double-edged Sword in host immunity. Int J Mol Sci 23(18):10224
Jiao H et al (2020) Z-nucleic-acid sensing triggers ZBP1-dependent necroptosis and inflammation. Nature 580(7803):391–395
Zhang T et al (2020) Influenza virus Z-RNAs induce ZBP1-Mediated necroptosis. Cell 180(6):1115–1129e13
Hao Y et al (2022) ZBP1: a powerful Innate Immune Sensor and double-edged Sword in host immunity. Int J Mol Sci, 23(18)
Mukhopadhyay H, Lee NY (2020) Multifaceted roles of TAK1 signaling in cancer. Oncogene 39(7):1402–1413
Malireddi RKS et al (2020) Innate immune priming in the absence of TAK1 drives RIPK1 kinase activity-independent pyroptosis, apoptosis, necroptosis, and inflammatory disease. J Exp Med, 217(3)
Schwarzer R et al (2020) FADD and Caspase-8 regulate gut homeostasis and inflammation by Controlling MLKL- and GSDMD-Mediated death of intestinal epithelial cells. Immunity 52(6):978–993.e6
Rodriguez DA et al (2024) The interaction between RIPK1 and FADD controls perinatal lethality and inflammation. Cell Rep 43(6):114335
Tummers B et al (2020) Caspase-8-Dependent inflammatory responses are controlled by its adaptor, FADD, and Necroptosis. Immunity 52(6):994–1006e8
Li X et al (2022) Caspase-8 auto-cleavage regulates programmed cell death and collaborates with RIPK3/MLKL to prevent lymphopenia. Cell Death Differ 29(8):1500–1512
Marín-Rubio JL et al (2019) FADD in Cancer: mechanisms of altered expression and function, and clinical implications. Cancers (Basel), 11(10)
Amaral MP, Bortoluci KR (2020) Caspase-8 and FADD: where cell death and inflammation collide. Immunity 52(6):890–892
Qi L et al (2023) Caspase-6 is a key regulator of cross-talk signal way in PANoptosis in cancer. Immunology 169(3):245–259
Groborz KM et al (2023) Selective chemical reagents to investigate the role of caspase 6 in apoptosis in acute leukemia T cells. Chem Sci 14(9):2289–2302
Ehrnhoefer DE et al (2019) Activation of Caspase-6 is promoted by a mutant huntingtin fragment and blocked by an allosteric inhibitor compound. Cell Chem Biol 26(9):1295–1305e6
Sahoo G et al (2023) A review on caspases: key regulators of Biological activities and apoptosis. Mol Neurobiol 60(10):5805–5837
Zheng M, Kanneganti TD (2020) Newly identified function of Caspase-6 in ZBP1-mediated Innate Immune responses, NLRP3 inflammasome activation, PANoptosis, and Host Defense. J Cell Immunol 2(6):341–347
Zheng M et al (2020) Caspase-6 is a Key Regulator of Innate Immunity, Inflammasome activation, and Host Defense. Cell 181(3):674–687e13
Lin Y et al (2023) Caspase 6 promotes innate immune activation by functional crosstalk between RIPK1-IκBα axis in liver inflammation. Cell Commun Signal 21(1):282
Mandal R et al (2020) Caspase-8: the double-edged sword. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1873(2):188357
Wei L et al (2019) Molecular characterization of caspase-8-like and its expression induced by microcystin-LR in grass carp (Ctenopharygodon Idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol 89:727–735
Orning P, Lien E (2021) Multiple roles of caspase-8 in cell death, inflammation, and innate immunity. J Leukoc Biol 109(1):121–141
Wang Q et al (2020) Pyroptosis: a pro-inflammatory type of cell death in cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta 510:62–72
Chan FHM, Chen KW (2023) Analyzing Caspase-8-Dependent GSDMD cleavage in response to Yersinia Infection. Methods Mol Biol 2641:115–124
Antonopoulos C et al (2015) Caspase-8 as an Effector and Regulator of NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling. J Biol Chem 290(33):20167–20184
Yang ZH et al (2020) A non-canonical PDK1-RSK Signal diminishes pro-caspase-8-mediated necroptosis blockade. Mol Cell 80(2):296–310e6
Thomas PG, Shubina M, Balachandran S (2023) ZBP1/DAI-Dependent cell death pathways in Influenza A Virus Immunity and Pathogenesis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 442:41–63
Banoth B et al (2020) ZBP1 promotes fungi-induced inflammasome activation and pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). J Biol Chem 295(52):18276–18283
Kesavardhana S et al (2020) The Zα2 domain of ZBP1 is a molecular switch regulating influenza-induced PANoptosis and perinatal lethality during development. J Biol Chem 295(24):8325–8330
Wang Y, Kanneganti TD (2021) From pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis to PANoptosis: a mechanistic compendium of programmed cell death pathways. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 19:4641–4657
Koehler H et al (2021) Vaccinia virus E3 prevents sensing of Z-RNA to block ZBP1-dependent necroptosis. Cell Host Microbe 29(8):1266–1276e5
Udawatte DJ, Rothman AL (2021) Viral suppression of RIPK1-Mediated signaling. mBio 12(4):e0172321
Tao L et al (2021) RIP1 kinase activity promotes steatohepatitis through mediating cell death and inflammation in macrophages. Cell Death Differ 28(4):1418–1433
Briard B, Malireddi RKS, Kanneganti TD (2021) Role of inflammasomes/pyroptosis and PANoptosis during fungal infection. PLoS Pathog 17(3):e1009358
Sharma BR, Karki R, Kanneganti TD (2019) Role of AIM2 inflammasome in inflammatory diseases, cancer and infection. Eur J Immunol 49(11):1998–2011
Wang B et al (2020) Immunobiology and structural biology of AIM2 inflammasome. Mol Aspects Med 76:100869
Feng S et al (2022) Pathogen-selective killing by guanylate-binding proteins as a molecular mechanism leading to inflammasome signaling. Nat Commun 13(1):4395
Lee S et al (2021) AIM2 forms a complex with pyrin and ZBP1 to drive PANoptosis and host defence. Nature 597(7876):415–419
Malireddi RKS et al (2018) TAK1 restricts spontaneous NLRP3 activation and cell death to control myeloid proliferation. J Exp Med 215(4):1023–1034
Malireddi RKS et al (2020) RIPK1 distinctly regulates Yersinia-Induced Inflammatory Cell Death, PANoptosis. Immunohorizons 4(12):789–796
Orning P et al (2018) Pathogen blockade of TAK1 triggers caspase-8-dependent cleavage of gasdermin D and cell death. Science 362(6418):1064–1069
Zheng Z et al (2021) The lysosomal rag-ragulator Complex licenses RIPK1 and caspase-8-mediated pyroptosis by Yersinia. Science, 372(6549)
Du J, Wang Z (2024) Regulation of RIPK1 phosphorylation: implications for inflammation, cell death, and therapeutic interventions. Biomedicines, 12(7)
Bai Y et al (2024) RIPK1 inhibitors: a key to unlocking the potential of necroptosis in drug development. Eur J Med Chem 265:116123
Sundaram B et al (2023) NLRP12-PANoptosome activates PANoptosis and pathology in response to heme and PAMPs. Cell 186(13):2783–2801e20
Henkel FDR, O’Neill LAJ (2023) NLRP12 drives PANoptosis in response to heme. Trends Immunol 44(8):574–576
Lopes JP, Lionakis MS (2022) Pathogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Virulence 13(1):89–121
Bertolini M et al (2019) Candida albicans induces mucosal bacterial dysbiosis that promotes invasive infection. PLoS Pathog 15(4):e1007717
Zhu S, Viejo-Borbolla A (2021) Pathogenesis and virulence of herpes simplex virus. Virulence 12(1):2670–2702
Crimi S et al (2019) Herpes virus, oral clinical signs and QoL: systematic review of recent data. Viruses, 11(5)
Coppola N et al (2023) Supportive care and antiviral treatments in primary herpetic gingivostomatitis: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 27(11):6333–6344
Gopinath D et al (2023) A Comprehensive Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and the management of herpes Labialis. Viruses, 15(1)
World Health O, Telecommunication UI (2021) Mobile technologies for oral health: an implementation guide. World Health Organization, Geneva
Aral K et al (2020) Inflammasomes and their regulation in periodontal disease: a review. J Periodontal Res 55(4):473–487
Hathaway-Schrader JD, Novince CM (2000) Maintaining homeostatic control of periodontal bone tissue. Periodontol 2021. 86(1): pp. 157–187
Antezack A et al (2023) New putative periodontopathogens and periodontal health-associated species: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res 58(5):893–906
Jia L et al (2019) Pathogenesis of important virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis via Toll-Like receptors. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:262
Liu F et al (2024) Gingipain from Porphyromonas gingivalis causes insulin resistance by degrading insulin receptors through direct proteolytic effects. Int J Oral Sci 16(1):53
Luan X et al (2022) MicroRNAs: harbingers and shapers of periodontal inflammation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 124:85–98
He W et al (2023) Programmed cell death of periodontal ligament cells. J Cell Physiol 238(8):1768–1787
Wang L et al (2022) Microtubule affinity regulating kinase 4 promoted activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in periodontitis. J Oral Microbiol 14(1):2015130
Wang Z et al (2022) Long noncoding RNA distal-less homeobox 2 antisense 1 restrains inflammatory response and apoptosis of periodontal ligament cells by binding with microRNA-330-3p to regulate Ro60, Y RNA binding protein. Arch Oral Biol, 133: p. 105298
Sun DD et al (2023) Anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammation activity of circ_0097010 downregulation in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated periodontal ligament cells by miR-769-5p/Krüppel like factor 6 axis. J Dent Sci 18(1):310–321
Liu Q et al (2022) Inhibition of TRPA1 ameliorates Periodontitis by reducing Periodontal Ligament Cell oxidative stress and apoptosis via PERK/eIF2α/ATF-4/CHOP Signal Pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022:p4107915
Dong Y, Feng S, Dong F (2020) Maternally-expressed gene 3 (MEG3)/miR-143-3p regulates Injury to Periodontal Ligament cells by mediating the AKT/Inhibitory κB kinase (IKK) pathway. Med Sci Monit 26:e922486
WANG P et al (2022) Human β-defensin 2 enhances IL-1β production and pyroptosis through P2X7-mediated NLRP3 expression in macrophages. BIOCELL 46(5):1197–1207
Oka S et al (2021) A deficiency of Dec2 triggers periodontal inflammation and pyroptosis. J Periodontal Res 56(3):492–500
Zhang R et al (2022) Canonical and noncanonical pyroptosis are both activated in periodontal inflammation and bone resorption. J Periodontal Res 57(6):1183–1197
Li YY et al (2021) The Effect of Porphyromonas gingivalis Lipopolysaccharide on the pyroptosis of Gingival fibroblasts. Inflammation 44(3):846–858
Tang H et al (2022) A20 alleviated caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis and inflammation stimulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide and nicotine through autophagy enhancement. Hum Cell 35(3):803–816
Shi J et al (2019) Loss of periodontal ligament fibroblasts by RIPK3-MLKL-mediated necroptosis in the progress of chronic periodontitis. Sci Rep 9(1):2902
Zhang A et al (2024) PANoptosis is a compound death in periodontitis: a systematic review of ex vivo and in vivo studies. Oral Dis 30(4):1828–1842
Yang Y et al (2022) Mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase-mediated necroptosis aggravates periodontitis progression. J Mol Med (Berl) 100(1):77–86
Chen Q et al (2021) Periodontal inflammation-triggered by Periodontal Ligament Stem Cell Pyroptosis exacerbates Periodontitis. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:663037
Aral K, Aral CA, Kapila Y (2019) The role of caspase-8, caspase-9, and apoptosis inducing factor in periodontal disease. J Periodontol 90(3):288–294
Bugueno IM et al (2018) Porphyromonas gingivalis differentially modulates apoptosome apoptotic peptidase activating factor 1 in epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Am J Pathol 188(2):404–416
Gliga A et al (2023) Dental pathologies of endodontic origin and subsequent bacterial involvement - a literature review. Germs 13(4):373–380
Siqueira JF Jr., Rôças IN (2022) Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. Int Endod J 55(Suppl 3):512–530
de Brito LCN et al (2020) The apical root canal system microbial communities determined by next-generation sequencing. Sci Rep 10(1):10932
Amaral RR et al (2022) Root Canal Microbiome Associated with asymptomatic apical periodontitis as determined by high-throughput sequencing. J Endod 48(4):487–495
Chow AT et al (2019) Bacterial species associated with persistent apical periodontitis exert differential effects on osteogenic differentiation. Int Endod J 52(2):201–210
Gabrielli ES et al (2022) Comparative analysis of bacterial content, levels of lipopolysaccharides and lipoteichoic acid in symptomatic and asymptomatic endodontic infections at different stages of endodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig 26(1):287–302
Fonseca Tavares WL et al (2019) Scanning Electron Microscopic/Energy-Dispersive X-Ray analysis in cases of apical Periodontitis Refractory to Endodontic Treatment: a Case Series Study. Iran Endod J 14(4):306–312
Louzada LM et al (2020) Clinical investigation of Microbial Profile and levels of endotoxins and lipoteichoic acid at different phases of the Endodontic Treatment in Teeth with Vital Pulp and Associated Periodontal Disease. J Endod 46(6):736–747
Liu H et al (2022) Fusobacterium nucleatum triggers proinflammatory cell death via Z-DNA binding protein 1 in apical periodontitis. Cell Commun Signal 20(1):196
Ran S et al (2019) Enterococcus faecalis induces apoptosis and pyroptosis of human osteoblastic MG63 cells via the NLRP3 inflammasome. Int Endod J 52(1):44–53
Wang L et al (2016) Enterococcus faecalis Lipoteichoic Acid-induced NLRP3 inflammasome via the activation of the Nuclear factor Kappa B pathway. J Endod 42(7):1093–1100
Dai X et al (2020) Enterococcus faecalis induces necroptosis in human osteoblastic MG63 cells through the RIPK3 / MLKL signalling pathway. Int Endod J 53(9):1204–1215
Ahmad-Mansour N et al (2021) Staphylococcus aureus Toxins: an update on their pathogenic properties and potential treatments. Toxins (Basel), 13(10)
Kitur K et al (2016) Necroptosis promotes Staphylococcus aureus Clearance by inhibiting excessive Inflammatory Signaling. Cell Rep 16(8):2219–2230
Soe YM et al (2021) Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and host cell death pathways. Cell Microbiol 23(5):e13317
Chen H et al (2022) Exploring the role of Staphylococcus aureus in Inflammatory diseases. Toxins (Basel), 14(7)
Zhao Y et al (2020) Staphylococcal enterotoxin M induced inflammation and impairment of bovine mammary epithelial cells. J Dairy Sci 103(9):8350–8359
Winstel V, Schneewind O, Missiakas D (2019) Staphylococcus aureus exploits the host apoptotic pathway to persist during infection. mBio, 10(6)
Gehrke AE et al (2023) Neutralization of Staphylococcus aureus protein A prevents exacerbated osteoclast activity and bone loss during Osteomyelitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 67(1):e0114022
Wang X et al (2022) Staphylococcus aureus mediates pyroptosis in bovine mammary epithelial cell via activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Vet Res 53(1):10
Wang X, Eagen WJ, Lee JC (2020) Orchestration of human macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation by Staphylococcus aureus extracellular vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117(6):3174–3184
Hara H et al (2018) The NLRP6 Inflammasome recognizes Lipoteichoic Acid and regulates gram-positive Pathogen infection. Cell 175(6):1651–1664e14
Chow SH et al (2020) Targeting NLRP3 and staphylococcal pore-forming toxin receptors in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 108(3):967–981
Becker KA et al (2018) Staphylococcus aureus Alpha-Toxin disrupts endothelial-cell tight junctions via Acid Sphingomyelinase and Ceramide. Infect Immun, 86(1)
Watkins KE, Unnikrishnan M (2020) Evasion of host defenses by intracellular Staphylococcus aureus. Adv Appl Microbiol 112:105–141
Wang X, Yousefi S, Simon HU (2018) Necroptosis and neutrophil-associated disorders. Cell Death Dis 9(2):111
Duan X et al (2020) Inhibition of keratinocyte necroptosis mediated by RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL provides a protective effect against psoriatic inflammation. Cell Death Dis 11(2):134
Feng S et al (2022) Intracellular bacteriolysis contributes to pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus by exacerbating AIM2-mediated inflammation and necroptosis. Virulence 13(1):1684–1696
Hanahan D (2022) Hallmarks of Cancer: New dimensions. Cancer Discov 12(1):31–46
Mall R et al (2022) Pancancer transcriptomic profiling identifies key PANoptosis markers as therapeutic targets for oncology. NAR Cancer 4(4):zcac033
Karki R et al (2021) ADAR1 restricts ZBP1-mediated immune response and PANoptosis to promote tumorigenesis. Cell Rep 37(3):109858
Malireddi RKS et al (2021) Inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, mediated by cytokines in Diverse Cancer lineages inhibits Tumor Growth. Immunohorizons 5(7):568–580
Karki R et al (2022) ZBP1-dependent inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, and cytokine storm disrupt IFN therapeutic efficacy during coronavirus infection. Sci Immunol 7(74):eabo6294
Shi C et al (2023) PANoptosis: a cell death characterized by Pyroptosis, apoptosis, and Necroptosis. J Inflamm Res 16:1523–1532
Ragab D et al (2020) The COVID-19 cytokine storm; what we know so far. Front Immunol 11:1446
Jose RJ, Manuel A (2020) COVID-19 cytokine storm: the interplay between inflammation and coagulation. Lancet Respir Med 8(6):e46–e47
Mehta P et al (2020) COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395(10229):1033–1034
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170989) and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2022NSCQ‐MSX0794).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jiang wrote the manuscript and designed the figures. Fu discussed the contents of the review. Huang conceived and revised the manuscript. All authors have read, contributed, and approved the submitted version of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, X., Fu, T. & Huang, L. PANoptosis: a new insight for oral diseases. Mol Biol Rep 51, 960 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-09901-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-09901-y