Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) has been classified as a type I carcinogen. Since it is ingested orally through food and tobacco use, Cd is likely to be closely related to oral cancers. The relationship between cadmium and oral cancer was investigated using papers on Pubmed and Web of Science. Thus a total of 11 studies from these databases were included in the review. Cd concentrations were significantly higher in both the blood and hair of oral cancer patients than in controls. Additionally, it has been reported that Cd increases the activity of reactive oxygen species. Tobacco plants contain varying levels of Cd. The presence of high Cd concentrations in patients who use tobacco products and develop oral cancer is strong evidence that Cd is directly related to oral cancer. While planning a study to determine the Cd concentrations in biological samples, it is advisable to examine the methodologies of previous studies and to avoid technical deficiencies. New cell line studies are required to explain the relationship between Cd and autophagy-apoptosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cadmium (Cd) is a toxic heavy metal that has accumulated in our environment as a result of mining and industrial activity [1]. Humans are exposed to Cd due to food, water, soil/waste, air and tobacco products [2,3,4,5]. Cd binds to metallothionein (MT), an organic molecule, and competes for MT in organisms with essential trace elements such as zinc (Zn) for MT in organism [6, 7]. Cd is primarily stored in the liver, kidney and bones [1, 8]. It is well established that Cd plays a role in the aetiology of a variety of diseases, including anaemia and osteoporosis [9]. Many biological materials have been used to demonstrate its accumulation in the human body, including blood, hair, saliva, breast milk, and teeth [10,11,12]. In addition, numerous many animal experiments have been conducted to demonstrate the effects of Cd on living tissues [13,14,15].
The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified Cd as a type I carcinogen [16]. Cd has been linked to prostate, pancreatic, breast, lung, and bladder cancer [17,18,19]. Cd's potential carcinogenicity has also been highlighted in animal experiments and cell line studies [20, 21].
One of the most significant sources of Cd is tobacco [22, 23]. Cd is likely to be closely related to oral cancers because it is ingested through food and the use of tobacco products. The aim of this study is to review published research on the relationship between cadmium, a toxic and carcinogenic trace element, and oral cancer.
Methods
Search strategy
Between 1st and 5th May 2021, a systematic review of the literature on the relationship between cadmium and oral cancer in Pubmed and Web of Science Library was conducted. The search was performed by using the keywords “cadmium oral cancer” or “cadmium mouth cancer” or “cadmium dental” or “cadmium saliva” or “cadmium oral mucosa”.
Study selection
The study excluded reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, and articles that were not open access, were not written in English, or contained the term Cd only in their references.
Results
Literature search and study characteristics
A total of 11 studies were included in the systematic review (Fig. 1). The 11 articles were comprised of 7 case–control studies, a cross-sectional study, and 3 cell lines researches with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells. The main characteristics of the studies are summarized in Table 1. The numerical data obtained from the case–control studies are shown in Table 2.
Cd concentration in biological samples of oral cancer patients
Cd concentrations in oral cancer patients’ blood and hair were consistently higher than controls in all case–control studies except one [24,25,26,27, 31, 32, 34]. Cd was not detected in any of the remaining study’s samples, including those from control patients [31]. In a study in which Cd was detected in calculus, the study group’s Cd concentration was found to be higher than the control group’s [32]. Three studies established control and case groups based on whether or not individuals had cancer [25,26,27]. In the other three studies, tobacco product usage was considered when forming the groups [24, 31, 32]. In the only remaining study, the relationship between teenagers and the garbage disposal profession determined the separation of control and case groups [34]. According to a study of various cancer types in different parts of the body, all oral cancer patients who chewed tobacco had significantly higher Cd concentrations in their hair than control subjects [26].
Effect of Cd on apoptosis and autophagy
Cd has been shown to increase the activity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in studies using OSCC cell lines [28, 30, 33]. Autophagy and apoptosis have been shown to reduce oxidative stress in OSCC cells, but they can also result in the death of these cells [28, 30, 33].
Technique used to determine Cd concentration
Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) was used in almost all of the studies we included in the review to determine the Cd concentration [24,25,26,27, 31, 34]. The only study that used inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) also the only one that examined Cd concentration in calculus [32]. All studies that measured Cd concentration in hair samples used certified reference samples. In half of the studies in which blood samples were used, detection limits were not provided [24, 34]. It was observed that the detection limits of the study in which no Cd was detected in any sample were significantly lower than the scanning limits presented of the other study [31] (Table 2).
Discussion
In some of the case–control studies included in this review, the groups were selected according to their tobacco product use, and the amount of Cd in tobacco users’ biological materials was generally found to be high. In addition, other researchers which question individuals’ use of tobacco products demonstrates that authors focus on the relationship between OSCC and Cd exposure from tobacco products. According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) recommend a weekly Cd intake limit of 2.5 µg/kg and 5.8 µg/kg respectively [35, 36]. Smokers are estimated to consume twice the amount of Cd daily as non-smokers [37, 38]. Some studies report that approximately 10% of the Cd in tobacco products accumulates in the lungs and 20–50% enters the circulation system [27, 39, 40]. Additionally, some studies indicate that not only tobacco is a source of Cd exposure, but also various seafood and vegetables [5, 41]. While tobacco products are not the only source of Cd exposure for smokers, they are widely accepted as the primary etiological cause of Cd-induced toxic and carcinogenic effects, with the exception of occupational exposure [42].
Smoking can damage the oral epithelium and cause OSCC [28]. Numerous OSCC cell line studies conducted to clarify the mechanism of neoplasm development in the oral mucosa, have revealed that Cd increased ROS, which is thought to activate the tumorigenesis signal [30, 33]. According to all three studies, autophagy and apoptosis are bidirectional and may result in the death of the cell while performing their protective function. That is, it is believed that autophagy and apoptosis play a critical role in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of OSCC. So et al. demonstrated that Pin1, one of the molecules they examined, remained unaffected by Cd-induced autophagy. They stated that while autophagy protects the cell from Cd, it is also associated with poor prognosis [28]. Another cell line study using the heme oxygenase-1 (OH−) antioxidant enzyme revealed a positive correlation between the increase in Cd-induced ROS and the increase in OH−. The level of OH− induction has been predicted to be a useful tool for determining the extent of oxidative stress in cells. However, it has been reported that high levels of OH− may exacerbate cellular stress, thereby worsening rather than resolving the condition [30]. Autophagy has also been linked to metastasis and invasion. Additionally, autophagy causes cell death and tumorigenesis. While cell line studies have reported that identical enzymes behave differently in different cell types and yield inconsistent results, it has also been noted that little is known about the effect of Cd exposure on OSCC [33]. In addition, all three studies mentioned the close relationship between tobacco product usage and OSCC [28, 30, 33]. Thus, while the effect of Cd, which is present in high concentrations in tobacco products, at the cellular level is unknown, it is known to cause oxidative stress.
The numerical data for the Cd concentration in calculus are expressed in ng/g units, which can easily be converted to the microgram/g unit used in all studies on Cd concentration in hair [32]. The authors compared their Cd concentration they obtained in calculus to the results of a similar study and stated that it was consistent with the literature [43]. The findings of this study indicate that the Cd content of calculus is lower than that of hair. This could be because Cd accumulates in different tissues at different concentrations or because the concentration determination technique used is different.
Presently, ICP-MS is preferred over AAS for Cd analysis because it is faster and more sensitive [44]. In Bandeira et al.’s study, in which AAS was used, Cd was not detected in any sample. Cd concentrations below detection limits have been associated with smoking cessation in cancer patients [31]. However, when the detection limits of this study are compared to those of similar studies, it is clear that a very low detection limit was determined. The inability to detect Cd in this study could be due to a failure to establish an appropriate detection limit or a technical issue with the device used. In a study where Cd concentrations was determined using calculus, it was emphasized that before using the ICP-MS to determine the concentration, the appropriate method should be established and the detection limits correctly determined [43].
In one study, DNA damage was examined in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells, and it was found to be significantly higher in young e-waste scavengers than in the control group [34]. In an editorial letter published in the same year for this study, it was reported that demonstrating DNA damage with samples obtained from exfoliated buccal mucosa cells may not be reliable [45]. In the same editorial letter, referring to a study that found no difference in the cell nuclei of smokers and non-smokers, it was claimed that the method used by Alabi et al. made it impossible to demonstrate that heavy metals cause oral cancer. Fillman et al. stated that Cd exposure alters the telomere length in saliva and induces oxidative stress and apoptosis. While they made no mention of the relationship between oral cancer and Cd, they demonstrated that Cd-induced cellular changes in saliva, a critical component of the oral region, cause DNA damage and have a mutagenic properties. Chronic exposure to heavy metals beginning from childhood has been linked to various diseases such as cancer [29]. In summary, although there is compelling evidence that Cd can induce pathological changes in cells in the oral region, there is no conclusive evidence that Cd causes oral malignancy.
Conclusion
Increased Cd concentrations in patients who use tobacco products and have oral cancer are a strong indicator that Cd may be directly related to oral cancer. Additional research is required to determine the role of Cd in tobacco-related oral cancers.
While planning a study to determine the Cd concentrations in biological samples, it is prudent to examine the methodologies of previous studies and to avoid technical deficiencies.
Cd may have a critical role in autophagy and apoptosis. New OSCC cell line studies are required to clarify the relationship between Cd and autophagy-apoptosis.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
References
Nawrot T, Plusquin M, Hogervorst J, Roels HA, Celis H, Thijs L, Vangronsveld J, Van Hecke E, Staessen JA (2006) Environmental exposure to cadmium and risk of cancer: a prospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol 7(2):119–126
Das S, Nath M, Laskar AK, DebRoy S, Deb S, Barhai A, Choudhury AP (2021) Lead and cadmium exposure network in children in a periurban area in India: susceptibility and health risk. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 28(22):28133–28145
Lundh T, Axmon A, Skerfving S, Broberg K (2016) Cadmium and mercury exposure over time in Swedish children. Environ Res 150:600–605
Tian Y, Hou H, Zhu F, Wang A, Liu Y, Hu Q (2014) Simultaneous determination of chromium, cadmium, and lead and evaluation of the correlation between chromium and cotinine in Chinese smokers. Biol Trace Elem Res 158(1):9–14
Antoine JMR, Fung LAH, Grant CN (2017) Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in Jamaica. Toxicol Rep 4:181–187
Sogawa CA, Sogawa N, Yamamoto T, Oda N, Inoue T, Onodera K, Furuta H (2001) Localization of metallothionein (MT) and expression of MT isoforms induced by cadmium in rat dental pulp. Jpn J Pharmacol 86(1):65–72
Sawidis T, Yurukova L, Askitis T (2010) Chios mastic, a natural supplement for zinc to enhance male sexuality and prostate function. Pharm Biol 48(1):48–54
Dix-Cooper L, Kosatsky T (2018) Blood mercury, lead and cadmium levels and determinants of exposure among newcomer South and East Asian women of reproductive age living in Vancouver, Canada. Sci Total Environ 619–620:1409–1419
Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 68(1):167–182
Gil F, Hernández AF, Márquez C, Femia P, Olmedo P, López-Guarnido O, Pla A (2011) Biomonitorization of cadmium, chromium, manganese, nickel and lead in whole blood, urine, axillary hair and saliva in an occupationally exposed population. Sci Total Environ 409(6):1172–1180
Vollset M, Iszatt N, Enger Ø, Gjengedal ELF, Eggesbø M (2019) Concentration of mercury, cadmium, and lead in breast milk from Norwegian mothers: association with dietary habits, amalgam and other factors. Sci Total Environ 677:466–473
de Oliveira VLF, Gerlach RF, Martins LC, de Souza GC, Frazão P, Braga ALF, Pereira LAA (2017) Dental enamel as biomarker for environmental contaminants in relevant industrialized estuary areas in São Paulo, Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(16):14080–14090
Breton J, Daniel C, Dewulf J, Pothion S, Froux N, Sauty M, Thomas P, Pot B, Foligné B (2013) Gut microbiota limits heavy metals burden caused by chronic oral exposure. Toxicol Lett 222(2):132–138
Min KS, Ueda H, Kihara T, Tanaka K (2008) Increased hepatic accumulation of ingested Cd is associated with upregulation of several intestinal transporters in mice fed diets deficient in essential metals. Toxicol Sci 106(1):284–289
Ninkov M, Popov Aleksandrov A, Demenesku J, Mirkov I, Mileusnic D, Petrovic A, Grigorov I, Zolotarevski L, Tolinacki M, Kataranovski D, Brceski I, Kataranovski M (2015) Toxicity of oral cadmium intake: impact on gut immunity. Toxicol Lett 237(2):89–99
IARC (1993) IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risks to humans. In: International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed) Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry, vol 58. IARC, Lyon. Accessed 15 July 2018
Djordjevic VR, Wallace DR, Schweitzer A, Boricic N, Knezevic D, Matic S, Grubor N, Kerkez M, Radenkovic D, Bulat Z, Antonijevic B, Matovic V, Buha A (2019) Environmental cadmium exposure and pancreatic cancer: evidence from case control, animal and in vitro studies. Environ Int 128:353–361
Feki-Tounsi M, Hamza-Chaffai A (2014) Cadmium as a possible cause of bladder cancer: a review of accumulated evidence. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21(18):10561–10573
Van Maele-Fabry G, Lombaert N, Lison D (2016) Dietary exposure to cadmium and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int 86:1–13
Sanner T, Dybing E (2005) Comparison of carcinogen hazard characterisation based on animal studies and epidemiology. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 96(1):66–70
Al-Hebshi NN, Alharbi FA, Mahri M, Chen T (2017) Differences in the bacteriome of smokeless tobacco products with different oral carcinogenicity: compositional and predicted functional analysis. Genes (Basel) 8(4):106
Arain MB, Kazi TG, Baig JA, Afridi HI, Sarajuddin, Brehman KD, Panhwar H, Arain SS (2015) Co-exposure of arsenic and cadmium through drinking water and tobacco smoking: risk assessment on kidney dysfunction. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(1):350–357
Arain SS, Kazi TG, Arain AJ, Afridi HI, Baig JA, Brahman KD, Naeemullah, Arain SA (2015) Temperature-controlled ionic liquid-based ultrasound-assisted microextraction for preconcentration of trace quantity of cadmium and nickel by using organic ligand in artificial saliva extract of smokeless tobacco products. Spectrochim Acta A 138:387–394
Kazi TG, Wadhwa SK, Afridi HI, Kazi N, Kandhro GA, Baig JA, Shah AQ, Kolachi NF, Arain MB (2010) Interaction of cadmium and zinc in biological samples of smokers and chewing tobacco female mouth cancer patients. J Hazard Mater 176(1–3):985–991
Arain SS, Kazi TG, Afridi HI, Talpur FN, Kazi AG, Brahman KD, Panhwar AH, Arain MS (2015) Scalp hair and blood cadmium levels in association with chewing gutkha, mainpuri, and snuff, among patients with oral cancer in Pakistan. J Oral Pathol Med 44(9):707–713
Wadhwa SK, Kazi TG, Afridi HI, Talpur FN, Naeemullah (2015) Interaction between carcinogenic and anti-carcinogenic trace elements in the scalp hair samples of different types of Pakistani female cancer patients. Clin Chim Acta 439:178–184
Kazi TG, Wadhwa SK, Afridi HI, Talpur FN, Tuzen M, Baig JA (2015) Comparison of essential and toxic elements in esophagus, lung, mouth and urinary bladder male cancer patients with related to controls. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(10):7705–7715
So KY, Ahn SG, Oh SH (2015) Autophagy regulated by prolyl isomerase Pin1 and phospho-Ser-GSK3αβ involved in protection of oral squamous cell carcinoma against cadmium toxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 466(3):541–546
Fillman T, Shimizu-Furusawa H, Ng CFS, Parajuli RP, Watanabe C (2016) Association of cadmium and arsenic exposure with salivary telomere length in adolescents in Terai, Nepal. Environ Res 149:8–14
So KY, Kim SH, Jung KT, Lee HY, Oh SH (2017) MAPK/JNK1 activation protects cells against cadmium-induced autophagic cell death via differential regulation of catalase and heme oxygenase-1 in oral cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 332:81–91
Bandeira CM, de Almeida AÁ, Carta CFL, Almeida AA, de Figueiredo FAT, Sandrim VC, Gonçalves AJ, Almeida JD (2018) Tobacco influence in heavy metals levels in head and neck cancer cases. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(27):27650–27656
Zhang B, Tan X, He X, Yang H, Wang Y, Zhang K (2019) Evaluation of cadmium levels in dental calculus of male oral SCC patients with betel-quid chewing in Hunan Province of China. Biol Trace Elem Res 191(2):348–353
Fan T, Chen Y, He Z, Wang Q, Yang X, Ren Z, Zhang S (2019) Inhibition of ROS/NUPR1-dependent autophagy antagonises repeated cadmium exposure-induced oral squamous cell carcinoma cell migration and invasion. Toxicol Lett 314:142–152
Alabi OA, Adeoluwa YM, Bakare AA (2020) Elevated serum Pb, Ni, Cd, and Cr levels and DNA damage in exfoliated buccal cells of teenage scavengers at a major electronic waste dumpsite in Lagos, Nigeria. Biol Trace Elem Res 194(1):24–33
European Food Safety Authority (2012) Cadmium dietary exposure in the European population. EFSA J 10(1):2551
WHO (2011) Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants/prepared by the seventy-third meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA): Cadmium. WHO, Geneva
Kazi TG, Jalbani N, Arain MB, Jamali MK, Afridi HI, Sarfraz RA, Shah AQ (2009) Toxic metals distribution in different components of Pakistani and imported cigarettes by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometer. J Hazard Mater 163(1):302–307
Staessen JA, Buchet JP, Ginucchio G, Lauwerys RR, Lijnen P, Roels H, Fagard R (1996) Public health implications of environmental exposure to cadmium and lead: an overview of epidemiological studies in Belgium Working Groups. J Cardiovasc Risk 3(1):26–41
Talio MC, Luconi MO, Masi AN, Fernández LP (2010) Cadmium monitoring in saliva and urine as indicator of smoking addiction. Sci Total Environ 408(16):3125–3132
Bernhard D, Rossmann A, Wick G (2005) Metals in cigarette smoke. IUBMB Life 57(12):805–809
Chiesa LM, Ceriani F, Caligara M, Di Candia D, Malandra R, Panseri S, Arioli F (2018) Mussels and clams from the Italian fish market. Is there a human exposition risk to metals and arsenic? Chemosphere 194:644–649
Waisberg M, Joseph P, Hale B, Beyersmann D (2003) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cadmium carcinogenesis. Toxicology 192(2–3):95–117
Yaprak E, Yolcubal I, Sinanoğlu A, Doğrul-Demiray A, Guzeldemir-Akcakanat E, Marakoğlu I (2017) High levels of heavy metal accumulation in dental calculus of smokers: a pilot inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry study. J Periodontal Res 52(1):83–88
Trzcinka-Ochocka M, Brodzka R, Janasik B (2016) Useful and fast method for blood lead and cadmium determination using ICP-MS and GF-AAS; validation parameters. J Clin Lab Anal 30(2):130–139
Pisani LP, de Castro GM, Ribeiro DA (2020) Letter to the Editor—the use of micronucleus assay on buccal mucosa cells for risk assessment: relevance of cigarette smoke and cytogenotoxicity. Biol Trace Elem Res 194(2):627–628
Funding
The author does not have any financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare that there is no any financial or non-financial conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Satir, S. The relationship between oral cancer and cadmium: a review. Mol Biol Rep 49, 2413–2419 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-07000-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-07000-w