Abstract
As an approach to understanding the factors that activate expression of tumor progression genes, the role of physiological stress in the activation of a panel of tumor cell markers was investigated. These studies identify the developmental gene product, anterior gradient 2 (AGR2) as a cancer cell marker specifically up-regulated in response to depletion of serum and oxygen. AGR2 has been identified as a tumor marker in primary and secondary cancer lesions, and as a marker for detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Elevated levels of AGR2 are known to increase the metastatic potential of cancer cells, but conditions leading to increased expression of AGR2 are not well understood. The present results identify novel physiological parameters likely to contribute to AGR2 induction in situ.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Detailed molecular characterization of aggressive tumor cells can lead to improved prognostic accuracy and therapeutic outcome [1]. We recently identified the human developmental gene product, anterior gradient 2 (AGR2), as a potential marker for detection of circulating tumor cells in the blood of patients with metastatic cancers [2]. AGR2 has likewise been identified in primary and secondary cancer lesions in several recent studies aimed at cataloging genes involved in the generation and/or metastasis of tumors [3–7]. Human AGR2 is a homolog of the secreted Xenopus laevis protein (XAG-2). In Xenopus, XAG-2 is primarily involved in the induction and differentiation of the cement gland, as well as in the patterning of anterior neural tissues [8]. Over-expression of mammalian AGR2 in benign nonmetastatic rat tumor cells increased the metastatic potential of these cells dramatically in vivo [6], linking up-regulation of AGR2 with a propensity for tumor cells to undergo metastasis. However, the factors that lead to up-regulation of AGR2 in tumor cells are poorly understood.
We have considered the role of physiological stress in the induction of cancer progression genes. The microenvironment of tumors often becomes heterogeneous and contains localized regions of harsh living conditions for normal and tumor cells alike [9]. Within the tumor mass, cells can gain an increased tumorigenic and/or metastatic potential if they can adapt to periods of serum depletion and hypoxia by expressing or activating gene products that promote survival, angiogenesis, motility, or invasion [10–13]. In an attempt to identify links between induction of potential tumor progression genes and specific parameters of physiological stress, breast cancer cells were subjected to conditions reflecting tumor cell-associated pathophysiological stress in the form of serum and oxygen depletion. The treated cells were examined for expression of a panel of previously identified tumor cell markers including AGR2. AGR2 emerged in this screen as a gene sharply up-regulated in response to physiological stress. This induction pattern offers new insight into the potential role of AGR2 in cancer cells, suggesting that AGR2 contributes to the survival of cells undergoing physiological stress in the microenvironment of the tumor. The AGR2 induction response could be blocked effectively by a synthetic inhibitor of ERK1/2, suggesting that the activation signal for AGR2 induction during stress is mediated through an ERK1/2-dependent pathway.
Materials and methods
Cell culture, treatments, RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
MDA-MB-231 cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Prior to treatment, cells were grown to 80–90% confluency under the conditions described above. For serum withdrawal experiments, cells were re-fed with serum free media and incubated in a standard cell culture incubator. For oxygen depletion experiments, cells were re-fed with media containing 10% FBS and placed into a hypoxia chamber (Billups Rothenberg). The air in the chamber was displaced with a low oxygen gas mixture of 1% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide, and 94% nitrogen at a flow rate of 20 l min−1 for 10 min. The sealed chamber was then placed in a standard cell culture incubator and cells were supplied with fresh low oxygen gas mixture every 24 h. Simultaneous serum and oxygen depletion experiments were performed by combining the above treatments. Untreated cells were re-fed with media containing 10% FBS and incubated for the indicated times in a standard cell culture incubator. After treatment, cells were harvested, resuspended in 1 ml of Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carslbad, CA) and RNA was isolated according to manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA was treated with recombinant DNase I (Ambion, Austin, TX) and 1 μg of total RNA was placed into a 20 μl reverse transcription reaction containing SuperScriptII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Reverse transcription reactions were incubated at 42°C for 1 h. cDNA was subsequently diluted to 200 μl using nuclease free water prior to quantitative PCR analysis. 10 μl of diluted cDNA was used in each quantitative real-time PCR reaction.
Quantitative PCR analysis
Where possible, primer sequences that amplified a product of about 100 bp within 300 bases of the 3′ end of the transcript were selected. Primer sequences used for analysis were:
AGR2 (5′TTGCTTGACAACATGAAGAAAGC3′; 5′TTTCAAGTCTCAAGGCCTGACA3′),
VEGF (5′AGATCCGCAGACGTGTAAATGTT3′; 5′TCGGCTTGTCACATCTGCAA3′),
S100A16 (5′TGATGTTCCTGCCAAATTCCT3′; 5′TGCTACCACTGCCACCAAGAG3′)
and RPS27A (5′TCGTGGTGGTGCTAAGAAAA3′; 5′TCTCGACGAAGGCGACTAAT3′).
All the primers were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Primer specificity was validated using BLASTN software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Only primers showing unique identity to the target genes were considered. The AGR2 primers were also specifically compared with the sequence of the related gene AGR3, and show no significant homology. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Reactions were run using the following cycling conditions (pre incubation at 94°C 10 min, followed by 45–50 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min). Gene expression levels were determined using a standard calibration curve prepared from gene specific RT-PCR products with known concentrations. Gene expression levels between samples were normalized using the expression levels of the ribosomal protein RPS27A gene, which was shown recently to exhibit the least amount of variability in expression levels among different tissues [14]. PCR products were also assessed by dissociation curve analysis and agarose electrophoresis to verify the proper amplicon size and melting temperature.
Pathway inhibitors
SB202190 (p38 inhibitor), PD98059 (ERK1/2 inhibitor), SP600125 (JNK inhibitor) and Wortmannin (PI3K inhibitor) were a generous gift from Dr. Danny Dhanasekaran (Fels Institute for Cancer Research, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia PA). At the start of each treatment, pathway inhibitors were resuspended in DMSO and administered at final concentrations of 10 μM, 50 μM, 50 μM, and 500 nM respectively. None of the compounds was cytotoxic at the selected concentrations.
Results
AGR2 expression is induced in conditions of serum and oxygen depletion
As an approach to understanding the conditions that activate potential tumor progression genes we investigated the role of physiological stress. During the multi-step process of carcinogenesis, tumor cells experience local decreases in blood supply resulting in sporadic regions deficient in serum-derived growth factors and oxygen. The presence of regions of pathophysiological stress in breast tumors in particular is well documented [15–17]. In order to mimic such conditions, the established breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 was subjected to conditions of serum depletion, alone or combined with oxygen depletion (culturing in 1% oxygen rather than the normal level of 20% oxygen). The physiological parameters of serum and oxygen depletion mimic the depletion of serum-derived growth factors and oxygen experienced by breast cancer cells when they are poorly vascularized in vivo [10, 18].
Expression of a panel of genes previously identified as tumor cell markers in cancer tissue or CTCs [e.g., 2] was probed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) analysis of the stressed cells. The most striking result from this analysis was a marked induction of AGR2. In order to explore this further, the QRT-PCR analysis was repeated, and the cells were probed by Northern blotting as well. The quantitative RT-PCR results (Fig. 1A) indicate that AGR2 is induced about 5-fold within 24 h following serum depletion. Oxygen depletion alone had little observable effect on AGR2 expression, but did appear to enhance the inductive effects of serum depletion by several folds.
In order to verify that oxygen depletion was indeed occurring in these conditions, expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was monitored in parallel. The VEGF-encoded protein is a major pro-angiogenic molecule that has been well characterized for its role in suppressing the pro-apoptotic affects of serum depletion under hypoxia [10, 17, 19]. As expected, up-regulation of VEGF expression occurred in response to oxygen depletion alone (Fig. 1B). However, in contrast to the response seen with AGR2, there was virtually no induction of VEGF with serum depletion alone, and no enhancement of the response when both conditions were combined. The different patterns of induction observed between AGR2 and VEGF in response to serum and oxygen depletion verify that both parameters were effective, and suggest that distinct pathways are involved in the regulation of the expression of each gene.
Genes analyzed in parallel with AGR2 that showed no induction in response to either serum or oxygen depletion included the negative control β-actin (ACTB) (data not shown) and the tumor marker S100A16, which was examined further for comparison. Calcium binding proteins of the S100 family play central roles in many intra- and extra-cellular processes. S100A16 is prevalently expressed in breast cancer derived CTCs [2], and up-regulation has been observed in many tumors, suggesting a central cellular function related to malignant transformation [20]. QRT-PCR analysis of S100A16 expression in parallel samples revealed no significant induction in response to either serum or oxygen depletion (Fig. 1C), emphasizing that not all tumor markers are induced by these particular stresses. The induction patterns observed for AGR2, VEGF and S100A16 by QRT-PCR analysis were also apparent in Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1D).
AGR2 induction in response to physiological stress is independent of estrogen receptor (ESR1) expression
Expression of AGR2 has been strongly correlated with expression of the estrogen receptor gene ESR1 in human breast cancer cell lines and clinical tissue samples [6, 21–23]. ESR1 expression is strongly repressed in the MDA-MB-231 tumor cell line, apparently as a result of promoter methylation [24]. Expression of ESR1 was analyzed in parallel with AGR2 induction during physiological stress. No induction of ESR1 was apparent in conditions that induced a sharp increase of AGR2 expression (Table 1). Thus, although AGR2 and ESR1 expression occur together in the majority of breast tumors, induction of AGR2 is not dependent on expression of ESR1, and can be induced independently in conditions of physiological stress. Induction of AGR2 was also monitored in the estrogen receptor negative cell line BT20, where a qualitatively similar response of about 8-fold induction was seen after 48 h in conditions of no serum and low oxygen (data not shown). Two additional tumor markers in the panel showed a response to serum and oxygen deprivation. Trefoil factor family 3 (TFF3/ITF) and osteopontin (SPP1) were induced about 7-fold and 4-fold, respectively (Table 1). Both of these proteins are known to be induced in response to tissue injury and are linked with more aggressive behavior in cancer cells [25, 26], supporting a model in which induction of AGR2 is part of a cell survival response.
Induction of AGR2 expression in response to serum and oxygen depletion is reduced by the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059
Understanding the upstream signaling pathways involved in regulating AGR2 expression could prove important for the future development of targeted breast cancer therapies. In an effort to distinguish pathways involved in the regulation of AGR2 expression, the serum and oxygen depletion treatments were repeated in the presence of inhibitors specific for the ERK1/2 (PD98059), JNK (SP600125), p38 (SB202190) and PI3K (wortmannin) signaling pathways. Of the inhibitors tested, only PD98059 was associated with an appreciable block to AGR2 induction (Fig. 2A). This finding suggests that a MAPK/ERK-dependent pathway is involved in regulation of AGR2 expression during pathophysiological stress. VEGF and S100A16 expression were not significantly affected by any of the inhibitor molecules (Fig. 2B and C), again arguing that separable induction pathways regulate the responses of AGR2 and VEGF under the conditions assayed. Similar results for each gene were observed by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2D).
Discussion
Although hypovascular conditions are toxic to most cells, it is becoming clear that such conditions can promote the growth of tumor cells [27]. Indeed, pathophysiological stress within the tumor microenvironment can select for aggressive tumor cells by activating transcription of genes contributing to survival, proliferation, tissue invasion, and angiogenesis [11, 12, 17, 28, 29]. The sharp induction of AGR2 expression in conditions of serum depletion and low oxygen, suggests that AGR2 plays a role in cell survival during periods of stress. This conclusion is concordant with a recent observation that AGR2 inhibits p53 tumor suppressor mediated effects in response to UV exposure [5]. Interestingly, a structural relationship involving putative functional domains was reported recently between AGR2 and proteins of the disulfide isomerase family of molecular chaperones [30]. The implication that AGR2 might function as a molecular chaperone, in combination with its sharp induction in response to physiological stress, suggests that AGR2 may play a role in clearing cells of misfolded proteins accumulated during periods of stress.
AGR2 expression is usually associated with ESR1-positive breast tumor cells, and is induced by estrogen in breast cells (and by androgen in prostate cells) in a receptor-dependent manner [7, 31]. However, results described here show that physiological stress leads to induction of AGR2 in breast cancer cells independently of ESR1 expression. This helps to explain the observation that a percentage (at least 20%) of clinical breast cancer specimens are AGR2 positive and ESR1 negative [22], and supports a view that the potential role of AGR2 in breast carcinogenesis and/or metastasis can be enacted independently of hormone activity.
AGR2 induction also showed a response pattern distinguishable from that of the hypoxia response gene VEGF. In addition, induction of AGR2 expression in response to physiological stress was reduced by the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059, suggesting that an ERK1/2-dependent pathway participates in the regulation of AGR2 expression. The MAPK/ERK pathway has been implicated previously in an anti-apoptotic response during similar cell treatments [19, 32, 33].
Although the precise function of AGR2 and the mechanisms of its regulation remain to be elucidated, the studies reported here suggest a model in which AGR2 contributes to the survival of metastatic and primary breast cancer cells in the pathophysiological environment of the growing tumor, and reveal a novel mode of AGR2 regulation, independent of the estrogen receptor status of the cancer cell. A better understanding of AGR2 function and the parameters that regulate its expression could help in the development of targeted therapies aimed at blocking breast cancer metastasis.
References
Martin KJ, Kritzman BM, Price LM et al (2000) Linking gene expression patterns to therapeutic groups in breast cancer. Cancer Res 60:2232–2238
Smirnov DA, Zweitzig DR, Foulk BW et al (2005) Global gene expression profiling of circulating tumor cells. Cancer Res 65:4993–4997
Risinger JI, Maxwell GL, Chandramouli GV et al (2003) Microarray analysis reveals distinct gene expression profiles among different histologic types of endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 63:6–11
Huber M, Bahr I, Kratzschmar JR et al (2004) Comparison of proteomic and genomic analyses of the human breast cancer cell line T47D and the antiestrogen-resistant derivative T47D-r. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:43–55
Pohler E, Craig AL, Cotton J et al (2004) The Barrett’s antigen anterior gradient-2 silences the p53 transcriptional response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Proteomics 3:534–547
Liu D, Rudland PS, Sibson DR et al (2005) Human homologue of cement gland protein, a novel metastasis inducer associated with breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 65:3796–3805
Zhang JS, Gong A, Cheville JC et al (2005) AGR2, an androgen-inducible secretory protein overexpressed in prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 43:249–259
Aberger F, Weidinger G, Grunz H, Richter K (1998) Anterior specification of embryonic ectoderm: the role of the Xenopus cement gland-specific gene XAG-2. Mech Dev 72:115–130
Izuishi K, Kato K, Ogura T et al (2000) Remarkable tolerance of tumor cells to nutrient deprivation: possible new biochemical target for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 60:6201–6207
Baek JH, Jang JE, Kang CM et al (2000) Hypoxia-induced VEGF enhances tumor survivability via suppression of serum deprivation-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 19:4621–4631
Bao S, Ouyang G, Bai X et al (2004) Periostin potently promotes metastatic growth of colon cancer by augmenting cell survival via the Akt/PKB pathway. Cancer Cell 5:329–339
Le QT, Denko NC, Giaccia AJ (2004) Hypoxic gene expression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 23:293–310
Liotta LA, Kohn E (2004) Anoikis: cancer and the homeless cell. Nature 43:973–974
Lee PD, Sladek R, Greenwood CM, Hudson TJ (2002) Control genes and variability: absence of ubiquitous reference transcripts in diverse mammalian expression studies. Genome Res 12:292–297
Knowles HJ, Harris AL (2001) Hypoxia and oxidative stress in breast cancer. Hypoxia and tumorigenesis. Breast Cancer Res 3:318–322
Pugh CW, Gleadle J, Maxwell PH (2001) Hypoxia and oxidative stress in breast cancer. Hypoxia signaling pathways. Breast Cancer Res 3:313–317
Rak J, Yu JL (2004) Oncogenes and tumor angiogenesis: the question of vascular “supply” and vascular “demand”. Semi Cancer Biol 14:93–104
Chung J, Yoon S, Datta K et al (2004) Hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor transcription and protection from apoptosis are dependent on alpha-6-beta-1 integrin in breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 64:4711–4716
Gupta K, Kshirsagar S, Li W et al (1999) VEGF prevents apoptosis of human microvascular endothelial cells via opposing effects on MAPK/ERK and SAPK/JNK signaling. Exp Cell Res 247:495–504
Marenholz I, Heizmann CW (2004) S100A16, a ubiquitously expressed EF-hand protein which is up-regulated in tumors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313:237–244
Thompson DA, Weigel RJ (1998) hAG-2, the human homologue of the Xenopus laevis cement gland gene XAG-2, is coexpressed with estrogen receptor in breast cancer cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 251:111–116
Fletcher GC, Patel S, Tyson K et al (2003) hAG-2 and hAG-3, human homologues of genes involved in differentiation, are associated with oestrogen receptor-positive breast tumors and interact with metastasis gene C4.4a and dystroglycan. Br J Cancer 88:579–585
Innes HE, Liu D, Barraclough R et al (2006) Significance of the metastasis-inducing protein AGR2 for outcome in hormonally treated breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 94:1057–1065
Parl FF (2003) Multiple mechanisms of estrogen receptor gene repression contribute to ER-negative breast cancer. Pharmacogenomics J 3:251–253
Yio X, Zhang JY, Babyatsky M et al (2005) Trefoil factor family-3 is associated with aggressive behavior of colon cancer cells. Clin Exp Metastasis 22:157–165
Rodrigues LR, Teixeira JA, Schmitt FL et al (2007) The role of osteopontin in tumor progression and metastasis in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1087–1097
Harris AL (2002) Hypoxia—a key regulatory factor in tumor growth. Nat Rev Cancer 2:38–47
Liotta LA, Kohn EC (2001) The microenvironment of the tumor–host interface. Nature 411:375–379
Pennacchietti S, Michieli P, Galluzzo Mazzone MM et al (2003) Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene. Cancer Cell 3:347–361
Persson S, Rosenquist M, Knoblach B et al (2005) Diversity of the protein disulfide isomerase family: identification of breast tumor induced Hag2 and Hag3 as novel members of the protein family. Mol Phylogenet Evol 36:734–740
Wilson CL, Sims AH, Howell A et al (2006) Effects of oestrogen on gene expression in epithelium and stroma of normal human breast tissue. Endocr Relat Cancer 13:617–628
Ostrakhovitch EA, Cherian MG (2005) Inhibition of extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) leads to apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) mediated apoptosis in epithelial breast cancer cells: the lack of effect of ERK in p53 mediated copper induced apoptosis. J Cell Biochem 95:1120–1134
Risbud MV, Fertala J, Vresilovic EJ et al (2005) Nucleus pulposus cells upregulate PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signaling pathways under hypoxic conditions and resist apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal. Spine 30:882–889
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Danny Dhanasekaran for the gift of the inhibitor compounds.
This work was supported by Dept. of Defense BCRP Grant # DAMD17–01-1-0406 to EM, and by Immunicon Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Daniel R. Zweitzig and Denis A. Smirnov contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zweitzig, D.R., Smirnov, D.A., Connelly, M.C. et al. Physiological stress induces the metastasis marker AGR2 in breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biochem 306, 255–260 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-007-9562-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-007-9562-y