Abstract
Glutathione reductase (GR, NADPH: oxidized glutathione oxidoreductase, EC 1.6.4.2) catalyzes the reduction of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) to reduced glutathione (GSH) using NADPH as reducing cofactor. The aim of the present work was to purify and characterize GR from bovine liver. GR was purified using 2′, 5′ ADP-Sepharose 4B and DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow columns. The enzyme has been purified 5456-fold and with a yield of 38.4%. The molecular and catalytic properties of bovine liver GR have been studied. Optimum temperature and pH was found to be 50°C and 7, respectively. The activation energy of the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme was 9.065 kcal/mole. The molecular weight of the enzyme was found to be 55 kDa by SDS-PAGE. Kinetic characterization of bovine liver GR was also investigated, KmNADPH 0.063 ± 0.008 mM and KmGSSG 0.154 ± 0.015 mM were determined. It is accepted that parallel lines observed in these double reciprocal plots obeys Ping Pong mechanism and we have showed this in our steady state study. According to our results of statistical analysis, the Ping Pong mechanism is a suitable model since the loss function is less than the other mechanisms. However, competitive inhibition by a product could be accepted in sequential mechanisms but not in a Ping Pong mechanism. In this study, kinetic data are consistent with a branching reaction mechanism previously proposed for GR from other sources by other studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Glutathione reductase is a crucial enzyme, catalyzing the NADPH-dependent reduction of GSSG to GSH [1]. GR is mainly localized in cytosol, mitochondria, and chloroplast [2]. GRs had been purified from a variety of sources, from bacteria to mammalian cells, show great similarity both in physical and kinetic parameters, with different purification folds and yields; including the E. coli [3] human erythrocytes [4], rat liver [5], bovine brain [6], bovine ciliary body [7], calf liver [8], gerbil liver [9], anoxia-tolerant turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans [10], Rhodospirillum rubrum [11], Moniezia expansa [12], Cyanobacterium anabaena [13], malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum [14], and pea leaves [15]. Purification and kinetic properties of bovine liver GR have not been reported previously. We have purified the GR from bovine liver by using a two step chromatographic procedure consist of 2′,5′-ADP Sepharose affinity and DEAE Sepharose anion exchange Fast Flow. In the previous years, ammonium sulphate fractionation, DEAE-Sephadex, Sephadex G-100, hydroxyapatite [8], Sephadex G-75, CM- cellulose, and sephacryl S-200 [5] columns have been used frequently for purification of GR. The enzyme has been purified very rapidly in high yield (47%) by employing N6-(6-aminohexyl)-adenosine-1′,5′-bisphosphate Sepharose (N6-2′5′-ADP-Sepharose) [16] or 2′,5′-ADP-Sepharose 4B [8, 17] as affinity columns. Reactive Red-120-Agarose, Sephacryl S–300 [16], fast protein liquid chromatography FPLC-anion exchange, and FPLC-hydrophobic interaction chromatography [17] are also used for purification of the GR.
Kinetic mechanism of GR obeys to the Ping Pong mechanism [18] but some studies have proposed an ordered sequential mechanism [19]. Mannervik suggested that GR acting according to both Ping Pong and sequential mechanism; this type of mechanism named as branched mechanism [20]. The kinetic data of GR from the filamentous Cyanobacterium anabaena and the mouse liver are consistent with a branched mechanism [13, 21], the kinetic mechanism of human erythrocyte GR follows the Ping Pong/sequential ordered hybrid model [22]. In the kinetic studies of the GR from mycelium of Phycomyces blakesleeanus, at low concentrations of GSSG the Ping Pong mechanism prevails, whereas at high concentrations the ordered mechanism appears to dominate [23].
Materials and methods
Materials
Bovine liver, obtained from a local slaughterhouse was kept on ice and processed within 2–3 h after death.
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced form (NADPH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), Tris [Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane], DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., MO, USA. 2′, 5′-ADP-Sepharose 4B, were from Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Uppsala, Sweden. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was from British Drug Houses Ltd. All other reagents were analytical grade and obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., MO, USA.
Assay of glutathione reductase
Glutathione reductase activity was determined according to modified Stall method [24]. The incubation mixture contained 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4; 1 mM GSSG; 200 μM NADPH. Decrease in the absorbance of NADPH at 340 nm was monitored spectrophotometrically, at 37°C.
A unit of activity (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of 1 μmole of NADPH in 1 min under these conditions. Specific activity is defined as units per mg of protein.
Protein assay
Protein concentrations of column fractions were determined measuring the absorbance at 280 nm and, while pooled protein concentrations of the purification steps were determined by the method of Bradford [25] using bovine serum albumin as standard.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
SDS-PAGE was done using the method of Laemmli [26]. 10% slab gels were used for molecular weight determination. The gels were stained by the silver staining method of Merril [27].
Statistical analysis of kinetic data
The data were analyzed and the kinetic constants were calculated by means of a nonlinear curve-fitting program Statistica.
Purification of glutathione reductase
Step 1. Homogenization and ultracentrifugation
Bovine liver was purified by two subsequent chromatography consists of two steps after ultracentrifugation: 2′, 5′-ADP Sepharose 4B affinity and DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow anion exchange chromatography. All the procedures were carried out at +4°C. Bovine liver was minced with scissors after washing with physiologic serum and homogenized using an IKA ultra-turrax homogenizer with S18N-10G probe at 22, 000 l/min approximately 3 min with 3 volumes of 10 mM Tris/HCI buffer, pH 7.6, containing 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM EDTA (buffer A). The homogenate was then centrifuged at 105,000 × g for 60 min.
Step 2. Affinity chromatography
The supernatant obtained was loaded onto a 2′, 5′-ADP-Sepharose 4B column (1.5 × 6.7 cm) equilibrated with buffer A. The column was washed with the same buffer (the flow rate was 10.8 ml/h) until the absorbance at 280 nm decreased to 0.045 O.D. to remove all non-specifically bound compounds. 6PGD was not bound and eluted while washing the column with buffer A. GR and G6PD were bound to the column. Then GR and G6PD were co eluted with buffer A containing 0.1 mM NADP+. But we have pooled the fractions, which were showed just only GR activity (the flow rate was 10.8 ml/h). Elution profile of GR from 2′, 5′-ADP-Sepharose 4B column is given in Fig. 1.
Step 3. DEAE chromatography
The enzyme solutions obtained in the previous step loaded onto DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow column (1.5 × 7.5 cm) equilibrated with 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.9 (buffer B). The flow rate was maintained at 16.8 ml/h, the column was washed with buffer B until the absorbance at 280 nm decreased to 0.03 O.D. and GR was eluted with buffer B containing 200 mM KCl (Fig. 2).
The whole purification procedure took two working days. The enzyme was stable for one week at 4°C. No stabilizers were added to pure GR.
Results and discussion
Some properties of glutathione reductase
GR has been purified from bovine liver 5,456 fold and with a yield of 38.4% and specific activity of the enzyme 185. The purification procedures included high-speed ultracentrifugation, 2′, 5′-ADP Sepharose 4B affinity chromatography and DEAE Sepharose Fast Flow anion exchange chromatography. Previously GR has been purified from bovine brain by procedures included, 35–70% ammonium sulphate fractionation and DEAE cellulose, 2′, 5′-ADP Sepharose, Superdex 200 prep grade column chromatography respectively [28]. The purification procedure which we presented includes mainly two steps and allows the purification of the enzyme in a very short time with a high yield. Also in our purification protocol we have centrifuged at 105,000 × g for 1 h to get cytosolic fraction. In addition, GR was separated well from G6PD at the end of the purification as seen in Fig. 2. A summary of the purification is presented in Table 1. Similar purification fold and specific activity results were observed for the enzymes from bovine brain 5,000 fold, specific activity 145 [28]. In this study we have preferred to elute enzyme by NADP+ because it was shown that preincubation with NADPH resulted in 90% loss of activity which could be partially reversed by 2 mM GSSG but not GSH. GSH also caused inactivation which potentially amounted to >80%. This inactivation could not be reversed by GSSG [29]. Mouse liver GR has been purified by using 2′, 5′-ADP-Sepharose from which was specifically eluted by using NADP+ gradients [30]. But in another study bovine erythrocyte GR was eluted with a gradient of 0–0.5 mM GSH and 0–1 mM NADPH [31].
For the optimal pH determination, the enzyme activity was measured in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer within the pH range of 5–10. The enzyme was found to be stable between pH 6.5 and 10 and two optima occurred at pH 7 and 8 (data was not shown). This type of curve may be seen for diprotic systems and indicate that the active site of the enzyme contains several ionizable groups [32]. Optimum pH of the enzyme purified from various sources was found to be between pH 6.5 and 7.0 [4, 33]. However, in Phycomyces blakesleeanus [23] and Mytulis edulis [34] optimum pH of the GR was determined to be pH 7.5; in Eugleuna gracilis [35] and Cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. Strain 7119 optimum pH of GR was found to be 8.2, 9.0, respectively [13].
To obtain the optimum temperature, the activities of the enzyme were measured at saturating substrate concentrations in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4; between 20 and 80°C (data was not shown). The optimum temperature was obtained from the graph as 50°C. But in our experiments we preferred to study at physiological temperature (37°C). GR from wheat grain was relatively resistant to high temperatures and was very resistant to very low temperatures [36]. To obtain Arrhenius plot, the activities of the enzyme were measured between 20 and 55°C. Activation energy (Ea) was determined from the slope of the plot as 9.065 kcal/mole (data was not shown).
The subunit molecular weights of GR, from different sources are between 70 and 140 kDa [7, 23, 34]. The molecular weight of the GR from bovine liver was found to be 55 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3). The purified enzyme gave a single band on and SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4).
Kinetics of bovine liver glutathione reductase
In general, multi-substrate reactions were defined as Ping Pong or sequential mechanisms [32]. We have also reported that kinetic mechanism of the sheep kidney cortex G6PD found to operate according to a Ping Pong Bi Bi mechanism; the reciprocal plots have parallel lines and the loss function of the Ping Pong mechanism was less than the sequential mechanism [37].
In this study we have determined the kinetic mechanism of bovine liver GR. Initial-rate studies with the enzyme were performed; GSSG was used as variable substrate and the double reciprocal plots were drawn at different fixed concentrations of the other substrate, NADPH (Fig. 5).
The parallel lines observed in these double reciprocal plots are consistent with the widely accepted idea that GR operates according to a Ping Pong mechanism (Fig. 5). According to the results of statistical analysis, the Ping Pong mechanism is a convenient model since the loss function is less than the others. This kinetic behavior is typical of an enzyme reaction where the enzyme reacts with one substrate to be converted to a modified form before reacting with the second substrate which reconverts it to the original form. The Km values for NADPH and GSSG and Vm were determined to be 0.063 ± 0.008 mM, 0.154 ± 0.015 mM and 239.463 ± 15.469 respectively (Table 2).
Product inhibition of bovine liver glutathione reductase by NADP+
To identify the real type of the mechanism, product inhibition studies were also performed. Figure 6 illustrates the inhibition pattern obtained with NADP+ as the product inhibitor when NADPH was the variable substrate at fixed GSSG concentrations (0.7 mM). From these steady state kinetics data we have calculated the inhibition constant (Ki) of NADP+ as 0.043 ± 0.003 mM. The inhibition by NADP+ was competitive with respect to NADPH (Fig. 6).
The study was repeated by varying GSSG at constant NADPH concentrations. Initial velocities were determined at the same concentrations of NADP+. From the statistical analysis of data, the inhibition type was found to be uncompetitive with respect to GSSG and Ki was calculated as 0.219 ± 0.01 mM (Fig. 7).
Product inhibition of bovine liver glutathione reductase by GSH
GSH is also used in product inhibition studies. We have found that GSH inhibited the reaction, but only at high concentrations. GSH was found to be a non-competitive inhibitor with respect to both substrates. First, NADPH was varied substrate (Fig. 8) and GSSG was fixed substrate (0.7 mM), initial velocities were measured at 1, 2, and 4 mM concentrations of GSH. From the statistical analysis of data Ki was calculated as 8.506 ± 0.563 mM.
With regard to GSSG as variable substrate at fixed NADPH concentration (0.1 mM), GSH appears to be a non-competitive inhibitor (Fig. 9). From the double reciprocal plots and statistical analysis, Ki was calculated as 7.985 ± 0.466 mM.
In previous studies both Ping Pong mechanism [38] and branched mechanism have been proposed for GR [38–40].
However, at low GSSG concentrations the rate equation can be approximated by that of a simple Ping Pong mechanism [5]. Yeast GR, follows a sequential or Ping Pong mechanism at high or low NADP+ concentrations, respectively [40].
In this study we have studied the steady state kinetics of GR at pH 7.4 and data are consistent with a branching reaction mechanism previously proposed for GR from yeast [ 20]. The steady-state kinetic studies of yeast GR, performed when [GSSG] = 10[NADPH] in the assay mixture, show that at concentrations of GSSG under 450 microM the enzymatic mechanism pathway is Ping Pong. Furthermore, in the case of higher values, the enzymatic kinetics follows a sequential pathway. However, when the GR reaction passes to the Ping Pong mechanism, the inhibition effect by excess of NADPH is stronger than when the reaction takes place over the sequential mechanism [41].
Conclusion
In this study, GR has been purified from bovine liver by using 2′, 5′ ADP-Sepharose 4B and DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow columns. Some properties and kinetic characterization of the purified bovine liver GR have been investigated. This enzyme is essential for the antioxidative system that maintains adequate levels of reduced cellular GSH. Since GR is cytoprotective against ROS-induced damage, a better understanding the molecular and catalytic properties of this enzyme is important.
In the studies about the kinetic mechanisms of GR from different sources such as, Cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. Strain 7119 [13], E. coli [3], Chromatium vinosum [42], rat liver [5] seems to be a binary complex or two-site Ping Pong mechanism. Several previously investigated GRs give a steady-state kinetic pattern which is typical of a Ping Pong reaction mechanism [3, 5, 13]. The yeast enzyme, like the erythrocyte enzyme, is inhibited by NADP+ and inhibition is competitive with NADPH [20]. We have also found that inhibition of NADP+ is competitive with NADPH. The finding that NADPH was a competitive inhibitor towards NADP+ is also in disagreement with a Ping Pong mechanism. Competitive inhibition by a product against the corresponding substrate could be expected in various sequential mechanisms (Theorell-Chance, ordered, or rapid equilibrium random), but not in a Ping Pong mechanism [43]. In this study, steady state kinetics shows that bovine liver GR follows the Ping Pong mechanism. However, the kinetic data obtained from product inhibition studies was indicated sequential ordered mechanism. This could be explained by supposing that the GR normally functions by branching mechanism. As is the case with the same enzyme from other sources, the kinetic data is consistent with a branched mechanism.
References
Williams CH Jr (1976) Flavin-containing dehydrogenases. In: Boyer PD (ed) The enzymes, vol 13. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp 90–173
Schirmer RH, Krauth-Siegel RL, Schulz GE (1939) Glutathione reductase. In: Dolphin D, Poulson R, Avramovic O (eds) Glutathione: chemical, biochemical and medical aspects, Part A. Wiley, New York, pp 553–596
Bashir A, Perham RN, Scrutton NS, Berry A (1995) Altering kinetic mechanism and enzyme stability by mutagenesis of the dimer interface of glutathione reductase. Biochem J 312:527–533
Scott E, Duncan IW, Eksrand V (1963) Purification and properties of glutathione reductase of human erytrocytes. J Biol Chem 238:3928–3933
Carlberg I, Mannervik B (1975) Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J Biol Chem 250:5475–5480
Gutterer JM, Dringen R, Hirrlinger J, Hamprecht B (1999) Purification of glutathione reductase from bovine brain, generation of an antiserum, and immunocytochemical localization of the enzyme in neural cells. J Neurochem 73:1422–1430
Ng MC, Shichi H (1986) Purification and properties of glutathione reductases from bovine ciliary body. Exp Eye Res 43:477–489
Carlberg I, Mannervik B (1981) Purification and characterization of glutathione reductase from calf liver. An improved procedure for affinity chromatography on 2′, 5′-ADP-Sepharose 4B. Anal Biochem 116:531–536
Le Trang N, Bhargava KK, Cerami A (1983) Purification of glutathione reductase from gerbil liver in two steps. Anal Biochem 133:94–99
Willmore WG, Storey KB (2006) Purification and properties of glutathione reductase from liver of the anoxia-tolerant turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans. Mol Cell Biochem 297:139–149
Libreros-Minotta CA, Pardo JP, Mendoza-Hernandez G, Rendon JL (1992) Purification and characterization of glutathione reductase from Rhodospirillum rubrum. Arch Biochem Biophys 298:247–253
McCallum MJ, Barrett J (1995) The purification and properties of glutathione reductase from the cestode Moniezia expansa. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27:393–401
Serrano A, Rivas J, Losada M (1984) Purification and properties of glutathione reductase from the Cyanobacterium anabaena sp. strain 7119. J Bacteriol 158:17–324
Bohme CC, Arscott LD, Becker K, Schirmer RH, Williams CH Jr (2000) Kinetic characterization of glutathione reductase from the malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Comparison with the human enzyme. J Biol Chem 275:37317–37323
Romero-Puertas MC, Corpas FJ, Sandalio LM, Leterrier M, Rodriguez-Serrano M, Del Rio LA, Palma JM (2006) Glutathione reductase from pea leaves: response to abiotic stress and characterization of the peroxisomal isozyme. New Phytol 170:43–52
Garcia-Alfonso C, Martinez-Galisteo E, Llobell A, Barcena JA, Lopez-Barea J (1993) Horse-liver glutathione reductase: purification and characterization. Int J Biochem 25:61–68
Madamanchi NR, Anderson JV, Alscher RG, Cramer CL, Hess JL (1992) Purification of multiple forms of glutathione reductase from pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings and enzyme levels in ozone-fumigated pea leaves. Plant Physiol 100:138–145
Massey V, Williams CH Jr (1965) On the reaction mechanism of yeast glutathione reductase. J Biol Chem 240:4470–4480
Staal GE, Veeger C (1969) The reaction mechanism of glutathione reductase from human erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 185:49–62
Mannervik B (1973) A branching reaction mechanism of glutathione reductase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 53:1151–1158
Lopez-Barea J, Lee CY (1979) Mouse-liver glutathione reductase. Purification, kinetics, and regulation. Eur J Biochem 98:487–499
Öğüş H, Özer N (1999) On the kinetics of human erythrocyte glutathione disulfide reductase: does the enzyme really play ‘Ping-Pong’? Turk J Biol 23:143–151
Montero S, Arriaga de D, Busto F, Soler F (1990) A study of the kinetic mechanism followed by glutathione reductase from mycelium of Phycomyces blakesleeanus. Arch Biochem Biophys 278:52–59
Acan NL, Tezcan EF (1989) Sheep brain glutathione reductase: Purification and general properties. FEBS Lett 250:72–74
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254
Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227(5259):680–685
Merril H, Goldman D, Sedman SA, Ebert MH (1981) Ultrasensitive stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels shows regional variation in CSF proteins. Science 211:1437–1438
Dringen R, Gutterer JM (2002) Glutathione reductase from bovine brain. Methods Enzymol 348:281–288
Ogus H, Özer N (1991) Human jejunal glutathione reductase: purification and evaluation of the NADPH- and glutathione-induced changes in redox state. Biochem Med Metab Biol 45(1):65–73
Lopez-Barea J (1981) Mouse-liver glutathione reductase: inactivation by NADPH or two allelic variants. Rev Esp Fisiol 37(3):249–254
Erat M, Sakiroglu H, Ciftci M (2003) Purification and characterization of glutathione reductase from bovine erythrocytes. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 33(4):283–300
Segel IH (1975) Enzyme Kinetics, 3rd edn. (Chapter 9 & 11). Wiley, Toronto, 273 pp
Icen A (1967) Glutathione reductase of human eyrtrocytes, purification and properties. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 96:1–67
Ramos-Martinez JI, Rodriguez Torres AM (1985) Glutathione reductase of mantle tissue from sea mussel Mytilus edulis Purification and characterization of two seasonal enzymatic forms. Comp Biochem Physiol B 80:355–360
Shigeoka S, Onishi T, Nakano Y, Kitaoka S (1987) Characterization and physiological function of glutathione reductase in Euglena gracilis. Biochem J 242:511–515
De Lamotte F, Vianey-Liaud N, Duviau MP, Kobrehel K (2000) Glutathione reductase in wheat grain. 1. Isolation and characterization. J Agric Food Chem 48:4978–4983
Ulusu NN, Tandogan B (2006) Purification and kinetics of sheep kidney cortex glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 143(2):249–255
Patel MP, Marcinkeviciene J, Blanchard JS (1998) Enterococcus faecalis glutathione reductase: purification, characterization and expression under normal and hyperbaric O2 conditions. FEMS Microbiol Lett 166(1):155–163
Rescigno M, Perham RN (1994) Structure of the NADPH-binding motif of glutathione reductase: efficiency determined by evolution. Biochemistry 33(19):5721–5727
Rakauskiene GA, Cenas NK, Kulys JJ (1989) A ‘branched’ mechanism of the reverse reaction of yeast glutathione reductase. An estimation of the enzyme standard potential values from the steady-state kinetics data. FEBS Lett 243(1):33–36
Serafini MT, Romeu A (1989) Steady-state kinetic studies of glutathione reductase. Rev Esp Fisiol 45(2):199–202
Chung YC, Hurlbert RE (1975) Purification and properties of the glutathione reductase of chromatium vinosum. J Bacteriol 123:203–211
Cleland WW (1963) The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two or more substrates or products. III. Prediction of initial velocity and inhibition patterns by inspection. Biochim Biophys Acta 67:188–96
Acknowledgement
This work is a part of the project (02 G085) supported by Hacettepe University Scientific Research Unit
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulusu, N.N., Tandoğan, B. Purification and kinetic properties of glutathione reductase from bovine liver. Mol Cell Biochem 303, 45–51 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-007-9454-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-007-9454-1