Abstract
The biomass has been the choice of the heat source for cooking purposes since ancient times. The inefficient combustion process in traditional cookstoves has its shortcomings in the form of adverse consequences on human health and pollution of the environment. Research and development of improved cookstove, for those who are yet to adopt the cleaner fuels for the cooking, has occupied the scientific community and social workers alike to improve the conditions of these people. Most people who live in urban settings are using natural/petroleum gas or electricity for cooking. On the other hand, a large section of the people living in the hinterlands continue to use traditional cookstoves, which are of low efficiency and create indoor air pollution, which leads to severe health issues. To overcome these issues, many researchers have proposed various designs for improved cookstoves. This paper summarizes the available literature related to different cookstove designs, performance and emissions. The review covers detailed discussion on various parameters to enhance the performance of biomass cookstoves. In addition to that a comparison of different types of cookstoves, different fuels used in them, their efficiency and particulate matter emissions are studied. This paper also explores the possibility of the implementation of additional accessories such as thermoelectric generators.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
As per the global scenario, 2.7 billion people heavily depend on the traditional biomass cookstove for cooking purposes, with the major share from developing countries [1,2,3] of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Improved cookstoves have been developed, which significantly reduced emissions of harmful gases and increased thermal efficiency. Every year due to emissions produced by traditional stoves in the developing countries results in approximately 1.6–4 million deaths annually [4, 5]. The harmful emissions exhausted from traditional stoves are reported to claim the lives of many children under the age of 5 years, which is grave concern [6]. Because of the limited resources, people use solid fuels such as wood, animal dung, rice husk and crop residue throughout the developing world [7]. The fabrication and widespread adaption of the cookstove like top-lit updraft could be the way to overcome the problem of emissions [8]. The particulate matter emissions from traditional cookstoves have a notable impact on the climate. According to the 2011 Census of India [9], 67.2% of the total households used solid fuels and 88% of these households are in rural India. Every year about 16 million hectares of forests are consumed for cooking fuel [10].
Present scenario
In developing countries such as India, people are still habituated in using traditional cookstoves (three-stone fire) because of the limited budget, unawareness of technology and easy access to cheap (generally free) biomass fuel. The three-stone fire is the simplest and most common cookstove used throughout the landscape [11] (Fig. 1).
The need for improved cookstove
Traditional cookstove designs have different types of setup such as three-stone fire or brick and mortar models. These designs have been inefficient (thermal efficiency around 15%) at converting energy into necessary heat for cooking. The amount of biomass fuel needed for cooking purposes can be as high as 2 tonnes per family annually [4]. This cookstove causes indoor air pollution (CO, SOx, NOx, particulates, etc.) [15,16,17], which result in health-related complications [18]. Due to the harmful emissions, it also contributes to global warming. With the increase in the population, the demand for firewood has increased, which increases the deforestation at an alarming rate [19]. Improved cookstoves are developed by the researchers as the replacement of the existing conventional cookstoves [20], so they are designed to run on the same fuel like dung, firewood and biomass with better efficiency and cleaner operation [21], which also have social implications on the lives of communities [22, 23]. These ill effects on human health, spiraling deforestation and greenhouse gas emission in addition to the toxic fumes have necessitated the search [24,25,26] for more efficient cookstoves.
Challenges in the widespread adaption of improved cookstove
Looking into the advantages of improved cookstoves over conventional ones gives the impression that the users will wholeheartedly adopt the new ones [27], but the reality is not the same as one wishes to be. Many of the past biomass cookstove programs have not succeeded due to the lack of in-depth analysis of the socio-behavioral factors affecting the people [28], who use these devices [29]. In addition to that, lack of the willingness of the people to change the status quo [30,31,32] and inability to pay even the subsidized rate of cookstove has compounded the problem.
Comparison of cookstove
Improved cookstoves are classified into two types, namely natural draft and forced draft cookstove [33]. In natural draft design, the air required for combustion is provided by the draft created due to the density difference between hot and cold air, which results consequent natural circulation. On the other hand, in the forced draft cookstove, the air is provided using an external source such as a fan or a blower [34] (Fig. 2).
The natural draft cookstoves are available in single- or double-pot option, while the forced draft cookstove uses single-pot cooking at a time [38]. Natural draft cookstove efficiency ranges in 19–36% [38], while the forced draft cookstove can operate with hiked efficiency up to 44% [13] as shown in Table 1. Various researchers have found various efficiencies [39] in a variety of cookstove models.
Objectives of the work
The main aim of this work is to highlight the present scenario of the cooking setups and emphasize the implementation of the improved cookstove in households [42, 43], where conventional cookstoves are still being used in developing countries. The potential of improved cookstoves to enhance the indoor air quality is well proved [44], and a decrease in biomass consumption has correlation with rate of forest destruction [45]. This paper also describes the effect of various design–operation parameters and characteristics of the fuel on the thermal efficiency and emissions of the improved cookstove. For that, different parameters such as excess air ratio, inlet area ratio, chimney height, insulation, pot gap width, swirl flow, grate, skirt and materials are studied and their effects are compared for different cookstoves. In addition to that, the possibility of power generation using TEG is also explored. Limitation of improved biomass cookstove is also discussed.
Parameters vital to thermal efficiency of cookstove
It is important to determine the effect of various operating and geometric parameters on the performance of the cookstove. The range of variables is studied and investigated by the scientific fraternity after establishing sound procedures [46] for experimental [47, 48] and numerical [49] investigations. The safety aspects [50] of stove design and usage cannot be underestimated.
Thermal efficiency and other performance parameters of cookstove have been analyzed by researchers mainly using different standards developed by the agencies in different jurisdictions, e.g., BIS 13152 (part 1) 2013 in India. Thermal efficiency of cookstove can be calculated using the relation given below.
where η = thermal efficiency, %; Mw = mass of water taken in the utensil, kg; C = specific heat of water, kJ kg−1 K−1; t2 = final temperature of water, °C; t1 = initial temperature of water, °C; L = latent heat of evaporation of water, kJ kg−1; Ms = mass of water evaporated, kg; Mf = mass of fuel used, kg; and CV = lower calorific value of fuel, kJ kg−1.
The power input to the stove can be calculated using this relation.
where Pi = power input, kW, and Br = burning rate of fuel, kg h−1.
Excess air ratio (µ)
It is a parameter, which controls the availability of oxygen in the cookstove for the combustion process and temperature of flame [51, 52]. Excess air ratio is defined in terms of the percentage of oxygen in the flue gases as shown in Eq. (1). With an increase in excess air ratio, the flame temperature decreases. It was found in the work that maximum fuel burning rate, i.e., power, is obtained at µ = 1, but at that harmful gases will be quite high and efficiency will be low. The value of excess air ratio can be found for the optimum value of combustion efficiency [53]. Table 2 summarizes the results of an empirical study performed by Agenbroad et al. [54,55,56].
But with consideration of emission of CO and PM in mind, the limiting values for excess air ratio are 1.95–5.8.
Inlet area ratio
Kshirsagar and Kalamkar [59] during their work identified an important term, i.e., inlet area ratio. As the air comes into the stove combustion chamber through the vents, it needs to be evacuated as well. This is done from the top of the stove beside the container. For an efficient combustion process to happen, the value of the inlet area ratio is found to be more than 0.7 [51].
Chimney height
An increase in chimney height enhances the combustion efficiency due to the higher draft [60]. The decrease in chimney height means the decrease in cookstove height, which is good from the economics point of view. The data relating chimney height to the efficiency of the small-scale cookstove are shown in Table 3.
Insulation
Insulation of cookstove is very important to increase the performance, as it reduces the heat loss through the heated walls. With proper insulation of the cookstove, efficiency was found to be increased by 8% and consumption of fuel was found to be reduced by almost 5% [33]. The conductivity of material highly influences the selection of insulating material [61]. Glass wool, ceramic wool, fire brick, etc. are widely used as cookstoves’ insulation. With the increase in the thickness of insulating material, efficiency increases since it reduces heat losses. But after certain thickness of insulation, the decrease in the heat loss reduces and makes it economically non-beneficial to add more insulation thickness. The optimum thickness of insulation should be selected by the parametric study of the cookstove under consideration. Table 4 shows the efficiency of small-scale cookstoves with different insulation thicknesses.
Effect of the pot gap width
With a decrease in pot gap width, efficiency increases [65]. A very small pot gap width is not desirable, because it leads to blockage with soot deposition, which will decrease its efficiency [51]. Pot gap depends on the rate of fuel combustion. The minimum gap required for burning rate greater than 2 kg h−1 is 15 mm [66]. If the pot gap is too large, flue gas will not make complete contact with the pot surface, and if it is too small, then air supply becomes limited [66, 67].
Swirl flow creation
As an engineer, one knows the type of burners used in the boiler of thermal power plants, where turbulence in the flame is utilized for better mixing of air with fuel and higher combustion efficiency. Similarly swirling airflow condition can be created in cookstove to increase the efficiency. It increases combustion efficiency and gives a stable flame [33]. A gasifier stove with central holes for gasification gas and channels around them for swirling airflow was suggested by Deng et al. [68]. With this design, the thermal efficiency of the stove was observed to be increased by 10% and gasification efficiency by 2%.
Grate
Proper implementation of grate can increase efficiency and reduces the amount of pollutants [33]. It was found that the mean efficiency of a traditional cookstove can be increased by 7% when it is equipped with grate [69].
Skirt
It is a metallic part which is placed circumferentially around the pot. It is used to guide the flame on the pot increasing heat transfer, decreasing fuel combustion and hence efficiency [33]. 25–30% improvement in fuel consumption and CO emission are observed when pot with skirts was used [70].
Material for cookstove
The material used for manufacturing has a role to play in deciding the efficiency of the cookstove. The heat loss through the wall of the stove is influenced by the conductivity of the barrel material. In the same way, the heat absorbed and retained by the material is a type of loss of heat as well. These phenomena are heavily influenced by the selection of the material of the cookstove. Thermal properties of different materials for cookstove are shown in Table 5. It is observed that heat absorbed by metal is higher than clay. But since the heat transfer rate of metal is far better than clay, its heat recovery rate is faster. The selection of material has an impact on the cost of cookstove [71], which needs to be kept in mind, while designing the cookstove.
During a water boiling test [72], it was found that a metal cookstove achieves peak temperature in 17 min during the fourth phase (the phase which involves cooling of the material using water, thereby measuring the heat gained by the water), while a clay stove takes 36 min. In metals, mild steel is cheaper than stainless steel, but its life is quite shorter (1–3 years).
Fuel
Different types of feedstock
Verhaart [73] analyzed the cooking processes and energy requirements in a household for a range of culinary practices [74]. During the test, it is important to make sure that the entire amount of fuel is oxidized [75, 76] (Table 6).
-
1.
The addition of new fuel to the test stove should be avoided until previous lot completely burns out including volatiles.
-
2.
The air supply to the stove can be regulated by a variable flow blower to maintain the constant thermal output of the stove.
-
3.
Once the liquefied fraction of the fuel is completely burnt, airflow can be increased to increase the heat release from the char.
Use of pellets/briquettes
Small pellets are formed from compressed biomass fuels, which results in better burning of fuel and hence better efficiency [92, 93]. It also decreases particulate emissions [94]. It is always desirable to use pellets or briquettes instead of loose biomass, because of the higher energy density of pellets (Table 7).
Features of improved cookstoves in India
Efforts put in by the research community in the development of improved cookstoves are explored and tabulated in Table 8. A wide range of cookstoves are developed for different fuels.
Agricultural residual fuels
A large section of the rural population in India is dependent on the agriculture for their livelihood directly or indirectly. A large fraction of geographical area is used for agriculture and animal husbandry. Therefore, the availability of agriculture residual biomass and animal waste are significantly high in India. Three types of crops, i.e., cereal crops (rice, wheat, coarse cereals), sugarcane (SN) and cotton (CN), were analyzed [99]. The classification of crop residues is shown in Table 9 along with their respective properties like residue-to-product ratio (RPR) and calorific value (CV).
Effect of moisture content (MC) in fuel
People using traditional cookstoves end up using non-dried biomass many a time, which can have a significant amount of moisture content in it. The fuel with higher moisture content may give misleading readings of carbon monoxide, particulate matter, etc. as it will decrease the emission per mass of the fuel [100].
Electricity generation using thermoelectric generator (TEG)
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) [101], around 1.2 billion people were deprived of electricity in 2016. In India, a large section of the hinterland is deprived of reliable electricity. Fortunately, cookstoves can generate electricity (in a small fraction) from heat lost by cookstoves. TEG is a semiconductor device used to convert heat energy into electrical energy as per Seebeck effect. A power of up to 5 W can be achieved by heat liberated from biomass cookstove, which is stored in Li-ion battery and can be further used to run DC fans, lighting LEDs and even charging mobile phones [102]. This utilization of waste energy increases the overall efficiency of the cookstove [103].
Table 10 shows two modules HZ-14 and HZ-9. The performance of different TEG modules is presented. One side of the module is attached to a hot plate, and a cold side is attached to a heat sink. Thermal and electrical properties are then recorded. Different thermoelectric generators are available in the market at reasonable prices. For example, 4.8 v open voltage, 100 °C temperature difference TEG is available in the range of ₹ 1100–1300 in India (Model: SP1848-27145).
Conclusions
After an extensive review of research papers on biomass cookstoves, it is observed that the natural draft cookstove is implementable in the rural areas of developing countries as compared to the forced draft. Various factors such as sociocultural, socioeconomic, public awareness and quality of the product should be overcome in such a way that people from rural area can shift from their traditional cookstoves to the improved cookstove. Many of the cookstove testing standards are evaluated for the stove-based emissions. However, it is obvious that the most efficient cookstove is not always user-friendly. Proper investigations of local ecology, availability of biomass, the orientation of the user, type of application and government initiatives like subsidies should be considered before designing any cookstove. Factors such as lower chimney height, effective optimum thickness of insulation and material of stove, lesser pot gap width, swirl flow creation, optimum grate and skirt design, and use of pellets or briquettes of biomass are selected based on the application of the cookstove. The utilization of TEG in order to produce electricity from waste heat is desirable as add-on in the cookstove. Efficient cookstoves have the potential to popularize, provided they prove to be user-friendly devices.
There is an essential need for user-friendly biomass cookstoves. It is observed especially in rural areas of developing counties. Most of the locally successful stoves are not accepted widely because of the reason discussed earlier. It could be due to the fact that the testing of such stoves is in ideal conditions in the laboratory. General awareness about efficiency, health and environmental effect of traditional cookstoves is very important along with the development of the stoves. More investigations are required to integrate solar thermal and photovoltaic (PV) systems with biomass cookstoves. Stored electricity from the battery, generated by a small PV panel could be utilized to drive blower/fan in the case of the forced draft cookstove. The same could also be utilized for the lightning purpose for roadside street vendors or household applications. While designing cookstoves, local ecology and agriculture/biomass availability should also be considered.
References
Upadhyay DS, Sakhiya AK, Panchal K, Patel AH, Patel RN. Effect of equivalence ratio on the performance of the downdraft gasifier—an experimental and modelling approach. Energy. 2019;168:833–46.
Upadhyay DS, Khosla A, Chaudhary A, Patel RN. Effect of catalyst to lignite ratio on the performance of a pilot scale fixed bed gasifier. Energy. 2019;189:116229.
Upadhyay DS, Makwana HV, Patel RN. Performance evaluation of 10 kWe pilot scale downdraft gasifier with different feedstock. J Energy Inst. 2019;92(4):913–22.
Gwénaëlle L, Ines H, Nigel B, Sophie B. The energy access situation in developing countries: a review focusing on the least developed countries and Sub-Saharan Africa. 2009.
G. Alliance for Clean Cookstoves. Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves FACTSHEET.
M.J. Wornat et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons identified in soot extracts from domestic coal-burning stoves of Henan Province, China. 2001.
KrishnaRao EG. A domestic cook stove of superior performance for solid fuels. J Inst Eng India Mech Eng Div. 1984;65(3–4):100–4.
Anderson P.Construction plans for the Champion-2008 TLUD gasifier cookstove, 2009.
Census of India—Fuel used for cooking. http://censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_data_finder/HH_Series/Fuel_used_for_cooking.htm. Accessed 24 Feb 2019.
Prasanna P. Modeling, optimization and design of a solar thermal energy transport system for hybrid cooking application. India: Indian Institute of Science Bangalore; 2010.
Nyahoro PK. Effects of air distribution on pollutant emission and flame characteristics of open buoyant wood combustion, 2008.
Giwa A, Alabi A, Yusuf A, Olukan T. A comprehensive review on biomass and solar energy for sustainable energy generation in Nigeria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;69:620–41.
Kumar M, Kumar S, Tyagi SK. Design, development and technological advancement in the biomass cookstoves: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;26:265–85.
Lask K, Booker K, Gadgil A. Lessons learned from a comparison study of charcoal stoves for Haiti. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2017;22:188–93.
Benka-Coker ML, et al. Kitchen concentrations of fine particulate matter and particle number concentration in households using biomass cookstoves in rural Honduras. Environ Pollut. 2020;258:113697.
Soneja SI, et al. Determining particulate matter and black carbon exfiltration estimates for traditional cookstove use in rural Nepalese village households. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(9):5555–62.
de la Sota C, et al. Indoor air pollution from biomass cookstoves in rural Senegal. Energy Sustain Dev. 2018;43:224–34.
Carrión D, et al. Examining the relationship between household air pollution and infant microbial nasal carriage in a Ghanaian cohort. Environ Int. 2019;133:105150.
Venkataraman C, Sagar AD, Habib G, Lam N, Smith KR. The Indian National Initiative for advanced biomass cookstoves: the benefits of clean combustion. Energy Sustain Dev. 2010;14(2):63–72.
Mehetre SA, Panwar NL, Sharma D, Kumar H. Improved biomass cookstoves for sustainable development: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;73:672–87.
United Nations Environment Program. Investing in improved stoves in Haiti, 2010.
Wang Y, Bailis R. The revolution from the kitchen: social processes of the removal of traditional cookstoves in Himachal Pradesh, India. Energy Sustain Dev. 2015;27:127–36.
Onyeneke RU, Nwajiuba CU, Aligbe JO. The link between improved cook-stove use and farm labour input in farming communities in Benue and Kaduna States, Nigeria. Cogent Environ Sci. 2017;3(1):1–9.
Carvalho RL, et al. Household air pollution mitigation with integrated biomass/cookstove strategies in Western Kenya. Energy Policy. 2019;131:168–86.
Pande RR, Kalamkar VR, Kshirsagar M. Making the popular clean: improving the traditional multipot biomass cookstove in Maharashtra, India. Environ Dev Sustain. 2019;21(3):1391–410.
Shen G, et al. Pollutant emissions from improved coal- and wood-fuelled cookstoves in rural households. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(11):6590–8.
Maji P, Kandlikar M. Quantifying the air quality, climate and equity implications of India’s household energy transition. Energy Sustain Dev. 2020;55:37–47.
Sovacool BK, Griffiths S. The cultural barriers to a low-carbon future: a review of six mobility and energy transitions across 28 countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;119:109569.
World Bank. Household cookstoves, environment, health, and climate change. Washington, DC, 2011.
Khandelwal M, et al. Why have improved cook-stove initiatives in India failed? World Dev. 2017;92:13–27.
Jan I, et al. Adoption of improved cookstoves in Pakistan: a logit analysis. Biomass Bioenergy. 2017;103:55–62.
Nguyen TTPT. Women’s adoption of improved cook stoves in Timor-Leste: challenges and opportunities. Dev Pract. 2017;27(8):1126–32.
Sedighi M, Salarian H. A comprehensive review of technical aspects of biomass cookstoves. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;70:656–65.
Raman P, Murali J, Sakthivadivel D, Vigneswaran VS. Performance evaluation of three types of forced draft cook stoves using fuel wood and coconut shell. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;49:333–40.
MNRE. Approved models of portable improved biomass cookstoves, vol. 13152, no. part 1, 2013.
Baqir M, Bharti SK, Kothari R, Singh RP. Assessment of an energy-efficient metal chulha for solid biomass fuel and evaluation of its performance. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2019;16(11):6773–84.
A Clean Burning Cookstove Developed in Vietnam|Improved Biomass Cooking Stoves. https://stoves.bioenergylists.org/beloniovnstove2010. Accessed 05 Mar 2020.
Tyagi SK, Pandey AK, Sahu S, Bajala V, Rajput JPS. Experimental study and performance evaluation of various cook stove models based on energy and exergy analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111(3):1791–9.
Soini E, Coe R. Principles for design of projects introducing improved wood-burning cooking stoves. Dev Pract. 2014;24(7):908–20.
Raman P, Ram NK, Murali J. Improved test method for evaluation of bio-mass cook-stoves. Energy. 2014;71:479–95.
Chagunda MF, Kamunda C, Mlatho J, Mikeka C, Palamuleni L. Performance assessment of an improved cook stove (Esperanza) in a typical domestic setting: implications for energy saving. Energy Sustain Soc. 2017;7(1):19.
Chica E, Pérez JF. Development and performance evaluation of an improved biomass cookstove for isolated communities from developing countries. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2019;14:100435.
Samal C, Mishra PC, Mukherjee S, Das D. Evolution of high performance and low emission biomass cookstoves—an overview. AIP Conf Proc. 2019;2200(1):020021.
Sharma M, Dasappa S. Emission reduction potentials of improved cookstoves and their issues in adoption: an Indian outlook. J Environ Manag. 2017;204:442–53.
Brooks N, Bhojvaid V, Jeuland MA, Lewis JJ, Patange O, Pattanayak SK. How much do alternative cookstoves reduce biomass fuel use? Evidence from North India. Resour Energy Econ. 2016;43:153–71.
Gupta A, Mulukutla ANV, Gautam S, TaneKhan W, Waghmare SS, Labhasetwar NK. Development of a practical evaluation approach of a typical biomass cookstove. Environ Technol Innov. 2020;17:100613.
Quist CM, Jones RB, Jones MR, Lewis RS. Uncertainty analysis and design guidelines of biomass cookstove thermal efficiency studies. Energy Sustain Dev. 2016;34:54–61.
Lombardi F, Riva F, Bonamini G, Barbieri J, Colombo E. Laboratory protocols for testing of Improved Cooking Stoves (ICSs): a review of state-of-the-art and further developments. In: Biomass and bioenergy, vol. 98. Elsevier Ltd, p. 321–335, 2017.
Pundle A, Sullivan B, Means P, Posner JD, Kramlich JC. Predicting and analyzing the performance of biomass-burning natural draft rocket cookstoves using computational fluid dynamics. Biomass Bioenergy. 2019;131:105402.
Gallagher M, Beard M, Clifford MJ, Watson MC. An evaluation of a biomass stove safety protocol used for testing household cookstoves, in low and middle-income countries. Energy Sustain Dev. 2016;33:14–25.
Kshirsagar MP, Kalamkar VR. User-centric approach for the design and sizing of natural convection biomass cookstoves for lower emissions. Energy. 2016;115:1202–15.
Pal K, Jha MK, Gera P, Tyagi SK. Experimental study on the performance evaluation and emission reduction potential of different cookstove models using standard design parameters and testing protocols. Biofuels. 2016;7(4):313–35.
Jain T, Sheth PN. Design of energy utilization test for a biomass cook stove: formulation of an optimum air flow recipe. Energy. 2019;166:1097–105.
Agenbroad J, DeFoort M, Kirkpatrick A, Kreutzer C. A simplified model for understanding natural convection driven biomass cooking stoves—part 2: with cook piece operation and the dimensionless form. Energy Sustain Dev. 2011;15(2):169–75.
Agenbroad J, DeFoort M, Kirkpatrick A, Kreutzer C. A simplified model for understanding natural convection driven biomass cooking stoves—part 1: setup and baseline validation. Energy Sustain Dev. 2011;15(2):160–8.
Agenbroad JN. A simplified model for understanding natural convection driven biomass cooking stoves. Libraries: Colorado State University; 2010.
Parajuli A, Agrawal S, Tharu JK, Kamat AK, Jha AK, Darlami HB. A simplified model for understanding the performance of two-pot enclosed mud cookstoves. Clean Energy. 2019;3(4):288–306.
Prapas J, Baumgardner ME, Marchese AJ, Willson B, DeFoort M. Influence of chimneys on combustion characteristics of buoyantly driven biomass stoves. Energy Sustain Dev. 2014;23:286–93.
Kshirsagar MP, Kalamkar VR. A mathematical tool for predicting thermal performance of natural draft biomass cookstoves and identification of a new operational parameter. Energy. 2015;93:188–201.
Ayub I, Munir A, Amjad W, Ghafoor A, Nasir MS. Energy- and exergy-based thermal analyses of a solar bakery unit. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133(2):1001–13.
Njoku HO, Agbo IN, Agwuna IP, Egeonu DI, Asuquo FU, Arji EI. Thermal performance improvement of kerosene cook-stoves by heat reuse and radiant heat shielding. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136(4):1847–60.
Dixit N, Mantri R, Aranke O, Godbole A. Effect of thermal insulation on thermal efficiency of portable solid biomass cookstove. In: IJISET (An ISO, vol. 3297), 2007.
Castaner M, Li D, Minor N. An efficient and safe cooking stove for Las Delicias, El Salvador, 2017.
Kshirsagar MP. Experimental study for improving energy efficiency of charcoal stove. J Sci Ind Res (India). 2009;68(5):412–6.
Obi OF, Ezeoha SL, Okorie IC. Energetic performance of a top-lit updraft (TLUD) cookstove. Renew Energy. 2016;99:730–7.
Baldwin SF. Biomass stoves: engineering design, development, and dissemination. Volunteers in Technical Assistance, 1987.
Andreatta D, Wohlgemuth, A. An investigation of skirts. In: Presentation at ETHOS conference, 2010, p. 29–31.
Deng S, Wang X, Tan H, Li Y, Hu Z, Niu B. Optimization of operating conditions of a household up-draft biomass gasification stove. BioResources. 2015;10(3):4178–90.
Jawurek HHH, Africa S, Assistance T, Ballard-Tremeer G, Jawurek HHH. Comparison of five rural, wood-burning cooking devices: efficiencies and emissions. Biomass Bioenergy. 1996;11(5):419–30.
MacCarty N, Still D, Ogle D. Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance. Energy Sustain Dev. 2010;14(3):161–71.
Brady MP, et al. Alloy corrosion considerations in low-cost, clean biomass cookstoves for the developing world. Energy Sustain Dev. 2017;37:20–32.
PCIA & Global Alliance. The water boiling test version 4.1.2; cookstove emissions and efficiency in a controlled laboratory setting. Glob Allian Clear Cookstoves. 2013;2:52.
Verhaart P. On designing woodstoves. Proc Indian Acad Sci Sect C Eng Sci. 1982;5(4):287–326.
Suresh R, Singh VK, Malik JK, Datta A, Pal RC. Evaluation of the performance of improved biomass cooking stoves with different solid biomass fuel types. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016;95:27–34.
Deng L, Torres-Rojas D, Burford M, Whitlow TH, Lehmann J, Fisher EM. Fuel sensitivity of biomass cookstove performance. Appl Energy. 2018;215:13–20.
Sonarkar PR, Chaurasia AS. Thermal performance of three improved biomass-fired cookstoves using fuel wood, wood pellets and coconut shell. Environ Dev Sustain. 2019;21(3):1429–49.
Cao G, Zhang X, Gong S, Zheng F. Investigation on emission factors of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants from crop residue burning. J Environ Sci. 2008;20(1):50–5.
Li X, Duan L, Wang S, Duan J, Guo X, Yi H, Hu J, Li C, Hao J. Emission characteristics of particulate matter from rural household biofuel combustion in China. Energy Fuels. 2007;21(2):845–51.
Li X, Wang S, Duan L, Hao J, Nie Y. Carbonaceous aerosol emissions from household biofuel combustion in China. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(15):6076–81.
Shen G, et al. Emission factors of particulate matter and elemental carbon for crop residues and coals burned in typical household stoves in China. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(18):7157–62.
Wang S, Wei W, Du L, Li G, Hao J. Characteristics of gaseous pollutants from biofuel-stoves in rural China. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(27):4148–54.
Zhang J, et al. Greenhouse gases and other airborne pollutants from household stoves in China: a database for emission factors. Atmos Environ. 2000;34(26):4537–49.
Guofeng S, et al. Emission factors, size distributions, and emission inventories of carbonaceous particulate matter from residential wood combustion in rural China. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(7):4207–14.
Shen G, et al. Reductions in emissions of carbonaceous particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from combustion of biomass pellets in comparison with raw fuel burning. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(11):6409–16.
Chen Y, Sheng G, Bi X, Feng Y, Mai B, Fu J. Emission factors for carbonaceous particles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from residential coal combustion in China. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(6):1861–7.
Chen Y, et al. Measurements of emission factors for primary carbonaceous particles from residential raw-coal combustion in China. Geophys Res Lett. 2006;33(20):L20815.
Chen Y, et al. Measurements of black and organic carbon emission factors for household coal combustion in china: implication for emission reduction. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(24):9495–500.
Zhang Y, et al. Characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese coal combustion. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(14):5068–73.
Zhi G, Peng C, Chen Y, Liu D, Sheng G, Fu J. Deployment of coal briquettes and improved stoves: possibly an option for both environment and climate. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(15):5586–91.
Zhi G, et al. Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles from various residential coal-stoves in China. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(9):3310–5.
Carter EM, Shan M, Yang X, Li J, Baumgartner J. Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency of Chinese gasifier cooking stoves and implications for future intervention studies. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(11):6461–7.
Tryner J, Willson BD, Marchese AJ. The effects of fuel type and stove design on emissions and efficiency of natural-draft semi-gasifier biomass cookstoves. Energy Sustain Dev. 2014;23(1):99–109.
Obi OF, Ezema JC, Okonkwo WI. Energy performance of biomass cookstoves using fuel briquettes. Biofuels. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1374769.
Shen G. Biomass and bioenergy changes from traditional solid fuels to clean household energies e opportunities in emission reduction of primary PM 2. 5 from residential cookstoves in China. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016;86:28–35.
Smith K.R. et al. Greenhouse gases from small-scale combustion devices in developing countries. United States Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
Jetter JJ, Kariher P. Solid-fuel household cook stoves: characterization of performance and emissions. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33(2):294–305.
Bhattacharya S, AbdulSalam P. Low greenhouse gas biomass options for cooking in the developing countries. Biomass Bioenergy. 2002;22(4):305–17.
Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources, New Delhi. Indian improved cookstoves: a compendium. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, no. 41, pp. 1–109, 1993.
Singh J. Identifying an economic power production system based on agricultural straw on regional basis in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;60:1140–55.
Huangfu Y, Li H, Chen X, Xue C, Chen C, Liu G. Effects of moisture content in fuel on thermal performance and emission of biomass semi-gasified cookstove. Energy Sustain Dev. 2014;21:60–5.
Energy access. https://www.iea.org/energyaccess/. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.
Mal R, Prasad R, Vijay VK, Verma AR. The design, development and performance evaluation of thermoelectric generator (TEG) integrated forced draft biomass cookstove. Procedia Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;52:723–9.
Panwar NL, Kumar H. Waste heat recovery from improved cookstove through thermoelectric generator. Int J Ambient Energy. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2019.1653978.
Tecteg Power Generator.com. https://tecteg.com/store-thermoelectric-power-module-selection-purchase/30x30-35x35/. Accessed 06 Mar 2020.
Acknowledgements
This survey is carried out as a part of Idea Lab project (Grant No.: IDEA-2017-ME-04) funded by the Institute of Technology, Nirma University. The authors are also thankful to all the reviewers for giving valuable suggestions to enhance the quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Memon, S.A., Jaiswal, M.S., Jain, Y. et al. A comprehensive review and a systematic approach to enhance the performance of improved cookstove (ICS). J Therm Anal Calorim 141, 2253–2263 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09736-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09736-2