Abstract
The cross sections for formation of metastable state of 178Hf (178m2Hf, 574.215 keV, 31 y) and 179Hf (179m2Hf, 362.55 keV, 25.05 d) through reactions induced by 14.8 ± 0.2 MeV neutrons on natural hafnium were measured for the first time. The monoenergetic neutron beam was produced via the 3H(d, n)4He reaction on ZF-300-II Intense Neutron Generator at Lanzhou University. Induced gamma activities were measured by a gamma-ray spectrometer with high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector. Measurements were corrected for gamma-ray attenuations, random coincidence (pile-up), dead time and fluctuation of neutron flux. The neutron fluence were determined by the cross section of 93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reaction. The neutron energy in the measurement were by the cross section ratios of 90Zr(n, 2n)89m+gZr and 93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Experimental data of neutron-induced reactions in the energy range around 13 to 15 MeV are needed to verify the accuracy of nuclear models used in the calculation of cross sections. Furthermore, the data are of considerable importance for practical applications, such as for integral calculations on the first wall, blanket and shield of a conceptual fusion power reactor. The data for gas production via neutron induced reactions are of great importance in the domain of fusion reactor technology, particularly of nuclear transmutation rates, nuclear heating and radiation damage due to gas formation. A lot of experimental data on neutron induced cross sections for fusion reactor technology applications have been reported and great efforts have been devoted to compilations and evaluations [1, 2]. In general, cross sections for the formation of isomeric states are more difficult to be predicted than those for the total reaction channels, since more details on the structure of the residual nucleus have to be taken into account (cf. Ref. [3]). The relative probability of forming isomeric states in a nucleus is mainly governed by the spin state values of the levels involved, and the spin distribution of the excited states of the compound nucleus. The high spin value 16+ and 25/2− of the second isomeric state (m2) of 178Hf and 179Hf (Fig. 1) relative to the corresponding values 0+ and 9/2+ of the ground state (g), offers great sensitivity for the study of the spin distribution of the residual nucleus. The cross sections of (n, 2n), (n, γ), (n, p), (n, d), (n, t)··· reactions for the isotopes of hafnium have been measured by many authors. Here, we adduced several authors [4–33], but the cross sections of natHf(n, x)178m2Hf and natHf(n, x)179m2Hf reactions have been not reported. Most of the authors neglected the effect of (n, n′), (n, γ) reactions or deducted the effect indirectly when they calculated the cross section of (n, 2n) reaction. Thus, we investigate them in order to give the cross section of the element producing certain radioactive product nuclide.
In the present work, the cross-sections of the above mentioned reaction were measured in at neutron energy 14.8 ± 0.2 MeV and a gamma-ray counting technique was applied using gamma-ray spectrometer and data acquisition system. Pure HfO2 was used as the target material. The reaction yields were obtained by absolute measurement of the gamma activities of the product nuclei using a coaxial high-purity germanium detector. The neutron energies in this measurement was determined by cross section ratios for the 90Zr(n, 2n)89m+gZr and 93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reactions [36].
Experimental
Cross sections were measured by activation and identification of the radioactive products. This technique is very suitable for investigating low-yield reaction products and closely space low-lying isomeric states, provided their lifetimes are not too short. The details have been described over the years in many publications [37–41]. Here we give some salient features relevant to the present measurements.
Samples and irradiations
About 3 g of HfO2 powder of natural isotopic composition (>99.95% pure) was pressed at 10 ton/cm2, and a pellet, 0.3 cm thick and 2.0 cm in diameter was obtained. One such pellet was prepared. Monitor foils of Nb (99.999% pure, 0.20 mm thick) of the same diameter as the pellet were then attached in front and at the back of sample.
Irradiation of the samples was carried out at the ZF-300-II Intense Neutron Generator at Lanzhou University and lasted about 22 h with a yield ~ 0.8 to 2.4 × 1011 s−1. Neutrons were produced by the T(d, n)4He reaction with an effective deuteron beam energy of 125 keV and beam current of 20 mA. The tritium-titanium (T-Ti) target used in the generator was 0.9 mg/cm2 thick. The neutron fluence rate was monitored by the accompanying alpha-particle so that corrections could be made for small variations in the yield. The accompanying α particle monitor is shown in Fig. 2. The Au–Si surface barrier detector used in 135° accompanying α-particle tube was at a distance of 119.7 cm from the target. The groups of samples were placed at 0° angle relative to the beam direction and centered about the T-Ti target at distances of 5 cm. Cross section for 93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reaction [42] was selected as monitors to measure the reaction cross section on several Hf isotopes.
Determination of the incident neutron energy
In the D-T reaction (Q value of 17.6 MeV), induced by deuterons of energy E d , the kinetic energy E n of the neutrons emitted at angle θ can be estimated [43] from the following expression (1);
where M d , M n and M α are the masses of deuteron, neutron and alpha particle, respectively. The effective D-T neutron energy at irradiation position was determined by the Nb/Zr method [36, 43–45]. The measured neutron energy was shown in Fig. 3 together with the calculation using Eq. (1). The uncertainty in the neutron energy at ~5 cm was estimated to be 200 keV from a consideration of the sample sizes, d+ beam diameter of about 3–4 mm, and the uncertainty in the Nb/Zr method [36].
The neutron energies were obtained both by the Eq. (1) and the Nb/Zr method (Lewis and Zieba [36]). The results are shown in Fig. 3. It can be seen, measured result is somewhat lower than the calculated value at neutron energy of 14.8 MeV. This discrepancy is probably due to the samples corresponding to the solid angle geometry, the neutron transport and scattering processes in the target and integrates over the sample volume. But measured result is consistent with the calculated value of Eq. (1) within the experimental uncertainty.
Measurement of radioactivity
The gamma ray activity of 178m2Hf, 179m2Hf, and 92mNb was determined by a CH8403 coaxial high-purity germanium detector made in the People’s Republic of China with a relative efficiency of 20% and an energy resolution of 3 keV at 1332 keV. The efficiency of the detector was calibrated using the standard gamma source, Standard Reference Material 4275 from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, D.C., USA. An absolute efficiency calibration curve was obtained at 20 cm from the surface of the germanium crystal. At this distance the coincidence losses can be considered to be negligible. In our case, however, we needed to calibrate the efficiency at 2 cm, the actual counting position used because of the weak activity of the sample. Therefore, we selected a set of single γ-line sources (137Cs, 54Mn) and placed them at two positions (20 and 2 cm) successively to measure their efficiency ratios to be able to evaluate the efficiency ratio curve as a function of energy. The absolute efficiency calibration curve at 2 cm was obtained from the calibration curve at 20 cm and the efficiency ratio curve. The uncertainty in the absolute efficiency curve at 2 cm was estimated to be ~2–3%, while the uncertainty of the activity of the standard source is ~1.0%.
The decay characteristics of the product radioisotopes and the natural abundances of the target isotopes under investigation are summarized in Table 1, [34, 35, 46].
Calculation of cross sections and their uncertainties
The measured cross sections can be calculated by the following formula [cf. 47]:
where the subscript m represents the term corresponding to the monitor reaction and subscript x corresponds to the measured reaction, ε full-energy peak efficiency of the measured characteristic gamma-ray, Iγ gamma-ray intensity, η abundance of the target nuclide, M mass of sample, \( D = e^{{ - \lambda t_{1} }} - e^{{ - \lambda t_{2} }} \) counting collection factor, t 1 ,t 2 time intervals from the end of the irradiation to the start and end of counting, respectively, A atomic weight, C measured full energy peak area, λ decay constant, F total correction factor of the activity:
where f s , f c and f g are correction factors for the self-absorption of the sample at a given gamma-energy, the coincidence sum effect of cascade gamma-rays in the investigated nuclide and in the counting geometry, respectively. Coincidence summing correction factor f c was calculated by the method [48]. In turn, the gamma ray attenuation correction factors f s in the HfO2 foil and the geometry correction f g were calculated by the following Eqs. (4) and (5), respectively.
Here μ (in cm−1) is the linear attenuation coefficient in HfO2 for gamma rays at each of the photon energies E, h (in cm) the thickness of the sample and D is the distance from the measured sample to the surface of the germanium crystal.
K neutron fluence fluctuation factor:
where L number of time intervals into which the irradiation time is divided, ∆t i duration of the ith time interval, T i time interval from the end of the ith interval to the end of irradiation, Φ i neutron flux averaged over the sample during ∆t i , \( S = 1 - e^{ - \lambda T} \) growth factor of the product nuclide, T total irradiation time, Φ neutron flux averaged over the sample during the total irradiation time T.
One can easily derive the expression of the Eq. (1) \( \eta_{x} \sigma_{x} \) as
Since the samples we selected are natural abundance, furthermore, the hafnium has many isotopes (174Hf, 0.162%; 176Hf, 5.206%; 177Hf, 18.606%; 178Hf, 27.297%; 179Hf, 13.629%; 180Hf, 35.100%) [46], it is obvious that a radioactive nuclide can be produced by several reactions, such as the reaction natHf(n, x)178m2Hf is made up of 179Hf(n, 2n)178m2Hf, 178Hf(n, n′)178m2Hf, 177Hf(n, γ)178m2Hf; natHf(n, x)179m2Hf is made up of 180Hf(n, 2n)179m2Hf, 179Hf(n, n′)179m2Hf, 178Hf(n, γ)179m2Hf and so on. Surely, each of the reactions producing certain radioactive product has different contribution. So in the calculation we just gave the cross section of the element and didn’t import the abundance of the target nuclide into the formula. For the reaction natHf(n, x)178m2Hf, there are three routes to produce 178m2Hf, the first via the 179Hf(n, 2n)178m2Hf reaction, the second through the 178Hf(n, n′)178m2Hf reaction, and the third via 177Hf(n, γ)178m2Hf reaction. So the cross section of natHf(n, x)178m2Hf reaction can be calculated by the following formula:
For the reaction natHf(n, x)179m2Hf, there are three routes to produce 179m2Hf, the first via the 180Hf(n, 2n)179m2Hf reaction, the second through the 179Hf(n, n′)179m2Hf reaction, and the third via 178Hf(n, γ)179m2Hf reaction. So the cross section of natHf(n, x)179m2Hf reaction can be calculated by the following formula:
The main contributions to the uncertainty of measurement in our work result from counting statistics (0.1–15%), standard cross sections uncertainties (1%), detector efficiency (2–3%), weight of samples (0.1%), self-absorption of gamma-ray (0.5%) and the coincidence sum effect of cascade gamma-rays (0–5%), the uncertainties of irradiation, cooling and measuring times (0.1–1%), etc. And some other uncertainty contribution form the parameters of the measured nuclei and standard nuclei, such as, uncertainties of the branching ratio of the characteristic gamma rays, uncertainties of the half life of the radioactive product nuclei and so on all are considered.
Results and conclusions
Results
Using the relative activation technique of neutron, the sample was sandwiched between two Nb foils which were used as monitor. Because the cross section of 93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reaction has been measured by many authors, we can select it as a standard. With the irradiation taking place, the neutron flux for the sample was the same as the flux for the monitors. So we can find an equation of neutron flux between them, and avoid importing the neutron flux into the calculation.
After having been irradiated, the samples were cooled for 5–24 days, and one sample was measured with a 20% relative efficiency HPGe detector. One of the gamma-ray spectra is shown in Fig. 4. Cross-section values for natHf(n, x)178m2Hf and natHf(n, x)179m2Hf reactions were obtained relative to those of the 93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reaction. The cross sections for the 93Nb(n, 2n)92mNb reaction, which is 459.7 ± 5.0 mb at 14.8 ± 0.2 MeV incident neutron energies, was obtained by interpolating the evaluated values of the literature [42]. The cross-sections measured in the present work are summarized in Table 2.
Conclusions
We have measured the activation cross sections for natHf(n, x)178m2Hf and natHf(n, x)179m2Hf reactions on hafnium isotopes induced by 14.8 ± 0.2 MeV neutrons. It should be mentioned that this work presents the first cross-sections for formation of 178m2Hf and 179m2Hf through reactions on natural hafnium. The high precision of the cross-sections obtained in the earlier measurement was limited, because there are 174Hf, 176Hf, 177Hf, 178Hf, 179Hf, and 180Hf isotopes in the natural hafnium and overlapping of the gamma-peaks from different isotopes could not be neglected in the gamma-spectrum measurements with the use of NaI(Tl) detectors. The decay data such as half-life and branching ratio of the radioactive product nuclei were imprecise at that early time. In recent years, the reliabilities of the results have improved with the use of the Ge semiconductor detectors and the more accurate above-mentioned parameters. A good plan of irradiation and cooling time is also important and in our experiment we selected different irradiation time according to the half-life of the product nuclei. In addition, the present measurements were performed in the Low Background Laboratory of Lanzhou University and disturbance from environmental radiation was reduced to a very low level. In conclusion, our data would improve the quality of the neutron cross-section database.
References
CINDA-A (2000) The index to literature and computer files on microscopic neutron data. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Mclane V, Dunford CL, Rose PF (1988) Neutron cross sections, vol 2. Academic, New York
Qaim SM, Mushtaq A, Uhl M (1988) Phys Rev C 38:645
Hillman M, Shikata E (1969) Cross sections of some reactions of hafnium isotopes with 14.5 MeV neutrons. J Inorg Nucl Chem 31:909
Qaim SM (1974) Total (n, 2n) cross sections and isomeric cross-section ratios at 14.7 MeV in the region of rare earths. Nucl Phys A 224:319
Lakshmana Das N, Srinivasa Rao CV, Rama Rao J (1981) Some neutron activation cross-sections in the heavy mass region. Ann Nucl Energy 8:283
Kong X, Wang Y, Yang J (1998) Cross sections for (n, 2n), (n, p) and (n, α) reactions on rare-earth isotopes at 14.7 MeV. Appl Radiat Isot 49:1529
Meadows JW, Smith DL, Greenwood LR, Haight RC, Ikeda Y, Konno C (1996) Measurement of fast-neutron activation cross sections for copper, europium, hafnium, iron, nickel, silver, terbium and titanium at 10.0 and 14.7 MeV and for the Be(d, n) thick-target spectrum. Ann Nucl Energy 23:877
Lakshmana Das N, Srinivase Rao CV, Thirumala Rao BV, Rama Rao J (1974) Pre-compound decay in (n, 2n) reactions at 14.2 MeV. Nucl Solid State Phys Symp 2:105
Kiraly B, Csikai J, Doczi R (2001) Validation of neutron data libraries by differential and integral cross sections, JAERI Conference Proceedings, 283
Doczi R, Semkova V, Fenyvesi A, Yamamuro N, CsM Buczko, Csikai J (1998) Excitation functions of some (n, p) and (n, α) reactions from threshold to 16 MeV. Nucl Sci Eng 129:164
Djumin AN, Egorov AI, Lebedev VM, Popova GN, Smolin VA (1977) Nuclear radii for some isotopes derived from total neutron cross-sections, All Union Conference on Neutron Physics, Kiev, 18–22 Apr 2:74
Goryachev AM, Zalesnyi GN (1977) Giant dipole resonance in Hf isotopes. Yad Fiz 26:465
Salaita GN, Eapen DK (1973) Production cross sections of isomers in As, Y, In, and Hf with 14.8 MeV neutrons. Trans Am Nucl Soc 16:59
Meason JL, Ganapathy R, Kuroda PK (1966) 14.8 MeV neutron activation cross sections for 181Ta(n, α)178 m, gLu and 178Hf(n, p)178 m, gLu. Radiochim Acta 6:26
Coleman RF, Hawker BE, O`connor LP, Perkin JL (1959) Cross sections for (n,p) and (n,α) reactions with 14.5 MeV neutrons, Proceedings of the Physical Society (London) 73:215
Konno C, Ikeda Y, Nakamura T (1990) Activation cross section measurements at neutron energy from 13.3 MeV to 15.0 MeV for 84Sr, 113In, 115In, 178Hf, 179Hf and 180Hf, Japanese Report to NEANDC 15:155
Murahira S, Satoh Y, Honda N, Takahashi A, Iida T, Shibata M, Yamamoto H, Kawade K (1995) Measurement of formation cross sections producing short-lived nuclei by 14 MeV neutrons—Pr, Ba, Ce, Sm, W, Sn, Hf, Japanese Report to the I.N.D.C., 171, 175/U
Konno C, Ikeda Y, Oishi K, Kawade K, Yamamoto H, Maekawa H (1993) Activation cross section measurements at neutron energy from 13.3 to 14.9 MeV, JAERI Reports, 1329
Ikeda Y, Konno C, Kumar A, Kasugai Y (1996) Summary of activation cross sections measurements at fusion neutron source in jaeri, IAEA Nuclear Data Section Report to the I.N.D.C., 19:342
Kirov A, Nenoff N, Georgieva E, Necheva C, Ephtimov I (1993) Activation cross sections and isomeric ratios in reactions induced by 14.5 MeV neutrons in Sm-152, Sm-154 and Hf-178. Zeitschrift fuer Physik A 245:285
Gurevich GM, Lazareva LE, Mazur VM, SYu Merkulov, Solodukhov GV (1980) Total photoabsorption cross sections for high-z elements in the energy range 7–20 MeV. Nucl Phys A 338:97
Goryachev BI, Kuznetsov YV, Orlin VN, Pozhidaeva NA, Shevchenko VG (1976) Giant resonance in the strongly deformed nuclei 159Tb, 165Ho, 166Er, and 178Hf. Yad Fiz 23:1145
Gurevich GM, Lazareva LE, Mazur VM, SYu Merkulov, Solodukhov GV, Tyutin VA (1981) Total nuclear photoabsorption cross sections in the region 150 < A < 190. Nucl Phys A 351:257
Ikeda Y, Smith DL, Kumar A, Konno C (1991) Measurements of long-lived activation cross sections by 14 MeV neutrons at FNS, JAERI-M Reports, 272
Sakane H, Kasugai Y, Shibata M, Iida T, Takahashi A, Fukahori T, Kawade K (2002) Measurement of activation cross section of (n, np + d) reactions producing short-lived nuclei in the energy range between 13.4 and 14.9 MeV using an intense neutron source Oktavian. Ann Nucl Energy 29:53
Prasad R, Sarkar DC, Khurana CS (1966) Measurement of (n, 2n) reaction cross sections at 14.8 MeV. Nucl Phys 88:349
Kong X, Wang Y, Yang J, Yuan J (1995) Recent progress on 14 MeV neutron activation cross section measurements. Communication of Nuclear Data Progress 14:5
Yu W, Lu H, Zhao W (1992) Measurement of activation cross section for Hf-179(n, 2n)Hf-178m2 reaction. Chin J Nucl Phys 14:326 (Beijing)
Kasugai Y, Yamamoto H, Kawade K, Ikeda Y, Uno Y, Maekawa H (1994) Activation cross section measurement of reactions producing short-lived nuclei at neutron energy between 13.4 MeV and 14.9 MeV, Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Gatlinburg 935
Rurarz E, Haratym Z, Pietrzykowski M, Sulik A (1970) Excitation of short-living isomeric activities with 14.5 MeV neutrons. Acta Phys Polonica B1:415
Gurevich GM, Lazareva LE, Mazur VM, Solodukhov GV (1976) About the width of giant resonance in the g-quanta absorption cross sections in the range of nuclei with A = 150–200. Zhurnal Eksper i Teoret Fiz Pisma v Redakt 23:411
Demekhina NA, Danagulyan AS, Karapetyan GS (2001) Remarks to the problem of the isomeric state production in the (γ, γ′) reactions in the giant dipole resonance. Yad Fiz 64:1879
Achterberg E, Capurro OA, Marti GV (2009) Nuclear data sheets for A = 178. Nucl Data Sheets 110:1473–1688
Coral M, Baglin (2009) Nuclear data sheets for A = 179. Nucl Data Sheets 110:265–506
Lewis VE, Zieba KJ (1980) A transfer standard for d + T neutron fluence and energy. Nucl Instr Meth 174:141
Luo J, Liu G, Tuo F, Kong X, Liu R, Li J, Lou B (2007) Phys Rev C 76:057601
Luo J, Wang X, Liu Z, Tuo F, Kong X (2010) Radiat Phys chem 79(10):1018–1021
Bostan M, Qaim SM (1994) Phys Rev C 49:266
Cserpák F, Sudár S, Csika J, Qaim SM (1994) Phys Rev C 49:1525
Nesaraja CD, Sudár S, Qaim SM (2003) Phys Rev C 68:024603
Wagner M, Vonach H, Pavlik A, Strohmaier B, Tagesen S, Martinez-Rico J (1990) Physik daten-physics data, evaluation of cross sections for 14 important neutron-dosimetry reactions, fachinformationszentrum karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische Information mbH, in the Federal Republic of Germany. No. 13–5
Curtis LF (1969) Introduction to neutron physics. D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton
Nethaway DR (1978) J Inorg Nucl Chem 40:1285
Pavlik A, Winkler H, Vonach H, Paulsen A, Liskin H (1982) J Phys G Nucl Phys 8:1283
Browne E, Firestone RB (1996) Table of isotopes. Wiley, New York
Luo Junhua, Chenghu Li, Liu Zhenlai, Wang Xinxing, Liu Rong, Jiang Li (2010) J Radioanal Nucl Chem V283(2):421–426
Mc GrahamJ, Co GraemeE (1975) Nucl Instr Meth 130:189–197
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Intense Neutron Generator group at Lanzhou University for performing the irradiations. This work was supported by the Program for Long Yuan Young Innovative Talents of Gansu Province, China and Scientific Research Start up Outlay of High-Position Talent in Hexi University in Gansu Province, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, J., Tuo, F. & Kong, X. Cross-sections for formation of 178m2Hf and 179m2Hf through reactions on natural hafnium at neutron energy 14.8 ± 0.2 MeV. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 288, 143–148 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0963-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0963-0