Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10155-0
1 Introduction
We correct a mistake on the Melnikov function given in (Battelli and Fečkan in J Dyn Differ Equ, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10155-0) for the persistence of periodic solutions in perturbed slowly varying discontinuous differential equations.
In [1] the following piecewise \(C^r\) system of differential equations
has been considered where
and \(f_\pm (x,y)\) and h(x, y) are \(C^r\)-functions, \(r\ge 2\), \(x\in {\mathbb {R}}^n\), \(y\in {\mathbb {R}}^m\). Suppose that the unperturbed system
has a family of \({\hat{T}}(\alpha ,\eta )\)-periodic, continuous and piecewise \(C^r\), solutions \({\bar{u}}(t,\alpha ,\eta )\), with \((\alpha ,\eta )\in {\mathbb {R}}^d\times {\mathbb {R}}^m\), where \({\hat{T}}(\alpha ,\eta )\) is a smooth function of \((\alpha ,\eta )\in {\mathbb {R}}^d\times {\mathbb {R}}^m\). Moreover there exist \(t_*(\alpha ,\eta )<t^*(\alpha ,\eta )\) such that the following hold
-
\(h({\bar{u}}(t,\alpha ,\eta ),\eta )>0\) for \(0\le t < t_*(\alpha ,\eta )\) and \(t^*(\alpha ,\eta )< t \le {\hat{T}}(\alpha ,\eta )\)
-
\(h({\bar{u}}(t,\alpha ,\eta ),\eta )<0\) for \(t_*(\alpha ,\eta )< t < t^*(\alpha ,\eta )\)
-
\(\bar{u}(t,\alpha ,\eta )\) intersects transversally the manifold \(\{x | h(x,\eta )=0\}\) at \(t=t_*(\alpha ,\eta )\), \(t=t^*(\alpha ,\eta )\).
[Actually in [1] \(t_*(\alpha ,\eta )\), \(t^*(\alpha ,\eta )\) are denoted with \({\hat{t}}_*(\alpha ,\eta )\), \({\hat{t}}^*(\alpha ,\eta )\)]. In [1] the following result has been stated:
Theorem 1.1
Suppose that conditions \((A_1){-}(A_5)\) in [1] hold and let \(B_*, B^*, b_*, b^*\) be as in [1, Proposition 3.9]. Then the adjoint linear system
has a d-dimensional space of \({\hat{T}}(\alpha ,\eta )\)-periodic solutions \(v(t,\alpha ,\eta )\) that are \(C^r\) for \(t\ne t_*(\alpha ,\eta ), t^*(\alpha ,\eta )\) with jumps at these points given by:
Moreover if \(\{v_1(t,\alpha ,\eta ),\ldots ,v_d(t,\alpha ,\eta )\}\) is a \(C^{r-1}\)-basis of the space of \({\hat{T}}(\alpha ,\eta )\)-periodic solutions of the adjoint linear system satisfying (1.3) and the \((d+m)\)-dimensional Melnikov vector
where
has a simple zero at \((\alpha ,\eta )=(\alpha _0,\eta _0)\), then there exists \(\varepsilon _0>0\) such that for \(|\varepsilon |<\varepsilon _0\) there exist \(C^r\) functions \(\alpha (\varepsilon ), \eta (\varepsilon )\) with \((\alpha (0),\eta (0))=(\alpha _0,\eta _0)\) such that system (1.1) has a unique \({\tilde{T}}(\varepsilon )\)-periodic solution \((x(t,\varepsilon ),y(t,\varepsilon ))\) satisfying
as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\), and \(\lim _{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} {\tilde{T}}(\varepsilon )={\hat{T}}(\alpha _0,\eta _0)\).
We have now realised that the expression of \( \mathcal{M}_1(\alpha ,\eta )\) given in the Theorem 1.1 above is not correct. Indeed Theorem 1.1 is obtained as an application of [1, Theorem 3.4] that correctly states
Theorem 1.2
Suppose that conditions \((A_1){-}(A_5)\) in [1] hold and let
where \(u(t,\xi ,\eta )\) and \(T(\xi ,\eta )\), \(\xi (\alpha ,\eta )\) have been defined in [1]. Let
be a smooth basis of \(\mathcal{N}J_{11}(\alpha ,\eta )^t\). Suppose, further, that \((\alpha ,\eta )=(0,0)\) is a simple solution of the system
where
is the projection with range \(\{f(0,0)\}^\perp \) and kernel the span of \(f(\xi (\alpha ,\eta ),\eta )\).
Then there exists \(\varepsilon _0>0\) such that, for any \(|\varepsilon |<\varepsilon _0\) equation (1.1) has a \({\tilde{T}}(\varepsilon )\)-periodic solution \((x(t,\varepsilon ),y(t,\varepsilon ))\), with \(\tilde{T}(\varepsilon )=T(\xi (\varepsilon ),\eta (\varepsilon ),\varepsilon )\) such that
as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\).
Now, the mistake in \(\mathcal{M}_1(\alpha ,\eta )\) comes from the fact that \(x_\varepsilon (t,\xi (\alpha ,\eta ),\eta ,0)\) is a piecewise \(C^r\), bounded, solution of the linear inhomogeneous system
and not of
as it was erroneously stated in [1, equation (3.32)].
As a matter of facts repeating the arguments given in [1, Section 3.2] we see that the correct statement of Theorem 1.1 is the following
Theorem 1.3
Suppose that conditions \((A_1){-}(A_5)\) in [1] hold and let \(B_*, B^*, b_*, b^*\) be as in [1, Proposition 3.9]. Then the adjoint linear system
has a d-dimensional space of \({\hat{T}}(\alpha ,\eta )\)-periodic solutions \(v(t,\alpha ,\eta )\) that are \(C^r\) for \(t\ne {\hat{t}}_*(\alpha ,\eta ,0), {\hat{t}}^*(\alpha ,\eta ,0)\) with jumps at these points given by:
Moreover if \(\{v_1(t,\alpha ,\eta ),\ldots ,v_d(t,\alpha ,\eta )\}\) is a \(C^{r-1}\)-basis of the space of \({\hat{T}}(\alpha ,\eta )\)-periodic solutions of the adjoint linear system satisfying (1.7) and the \((d+m)\)-dimensional Melnikov vector
where
has a simple zero at \((\alpha ,\eta )=(\alpha _0,\eta _0)\), then there exists \(\varepsilon _0>0\) such that for \(|\varepsilon |<\varepsilon _0\) there exist \(C^r\) functions \(\alpha (\varepsilon ), \eta (\varepsilon )\) with \((\alpha (0),\eta (0))=(\alpha _0,\eta _0)\) such that system (1.1) has a unique \({\tilde{T}}(\varepsilon )\)-periodic solution \((x(t,\varepsilon ),y(t,\varepsilon ))\) satisfying
as \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\), and \(\lim _{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} {\tilde{T}}(\varepsilon )={\hat{T}}(\alpha _0,\eta _0)\).
2 An example
It turns out, (see Appendix) that the correct Melnikov function for the example given in [1] does not have a zero. Because of this here we give another example, similar to the example in [1], using the correct result. To simplify matter, here we consider the 3-dimensional equation
whose associated unperturbed system is the 2-dimensional system depending on the parameter \(y\in {\mathbb {R}}\):
As in [1, Proposition 4.1] we prove that, for \(x_1>2y\), (2.2) has the family of \({\hat{T}}(\alpha )\)-periodic solutions
where
Note that \(x_1>2y \Leftrightarrow \alpha >2\), so in the remaining part of this note we take \(\alpha >2\). As in [1] we see that
Arguing as is [1] we prove that all assumptions \((A_1){-}(A_5)\) are satisfied and using the correct form of the Melnikov vector for the existence of periodic solutions of system (2.2) given here, we obtain
where we take \(-1\) in \([-t_1,t_1]\) and \(+1\) in \([t_1,3t_1]\). As in [1] it can be proved that
Hence we obtain, instead of [1, eq. (4.18)],
where we used (2.5) and set
Simplifying further, and using (2.4) we get
Next, it is easy to check that
Note also that, if \(Y(x,y,\varepsilon )\) is an odd function with respect to x, then \(\mathcal{M}_1(\alpha ,y) = \mathcal{M}_2(\alpha ,y) = 0\). To give a concrete example of application of Theorem 1.1 we take
Note that \(Y_{ev}(x,y)=Y(x,y)\) and
As
we see that
Then, replacing \(\alpha \) with \(\alpha +1\) (and then \(t_1=\arccos \left( -\frac{1}{\alpha }\right) \)) we get:
Similarly
So
with \(\alpha >1\). Using Newton method we find the following approximate solution of equation \(\mathcal{M}(\alpha +1,y)=0\)
and the Jacobian matrix at this point is invertible, its determinant being approximately equal to 37.25014840155305. Numerical computation shows that
In Figures -- we plot the periodic solution of the perturbed equation (2.1) with \(Y(x_1,x_2,y,\varepsilon )=x_2^2+yx_1^2-1\).
3 Conclusion
We have corrected a mistake in the Melnikov function given in [1] for the existence of periodic solutions of equation (1.1). The error in [1] comes from the fact that in [1, equation (3.32)] we missed an integral sign and we continued to use the wrong formula in the proof of the theorem. However we emphasize that the arguments in [1] give the true Melnikov condition when using the correct formula for the differential equation that \(x_\varepsilon (t,\xi (\alpha ,\eta ),\eta ,0)\) must satisfy, i.e. (1.5) instead of (1.6).
Reference
Battelli, F., Fečkan, M.: Periodic solutions in slowly varying discontinuous differential equations: a non-generic case. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10155-0
Funding
Partially supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-18-0308 and by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA No. 1/0358/20 and No. 2/0127/20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Authors equally contributed in the paper.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
In [1] the following equation has been studied as an application of the bifurcation Theorem:
The unperturbed system (\(\varepsilon =0\)) of (4.1) has the family of periodic solutions
where
Recall that \(u(t+2t_1,\alpha ,\omega ,y) = -u(t,\alpha ,\omega ,y)\) for all \(t\in {\mathbb {R}}\). Next, with reference to Theorem 1.3, we have
As in [1] we have
then, since for eq. (4.1) \(b_*=b^*=0\) (see [1]), we get, skipping some steps as they are quite similar to those in the previous section
Now both examples given in [1] are of the following kind:
then, since \(u_1(-t,\alpha ,\omega ,y)=u_1(t,\alpha ,\omega ,y)\) and \(u_2(-t,\alpha ,\omega ,y)=-u_2(t,\alpha ,\omega ,y)\), we have
and
Solving \(\mathcal{M}(\alpha +1,\omega ,y)=0\) is equivalent to \(\Omega _0(\omega ,y)= 0\) with \(\omega \ne 0\), and
From the second equation we get
that we plug in the first equation to see that it is equivalent to:
So \(\mathcal{M}(\alpha ,\omega ,y)=0\) is equivalent to
which has no solutions since \(\frac{\pi }{2}<\arccos (\theta )\le \pi \), for \(-1<\theta <0\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Battelli, F., Fečkan, M. Correction to: Periodic Solutions in Slowly Varying Discontinuous Differential Equations: A Non-Generic Case. J Dyn Diff Equat 36, 2999–3010 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10234-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10234-2