Abstract
This study explores the effects of the presence of external representations of a mathematical object (ERs) on problem solving performance associated with short double-choice problems. The problems were borrowed from secondary school algebra and geometry, and the ERs were either formulas, graphs of functions, or drawings of geometric figures. Performance was evaluated according to the reaction time (RT) required for solving the problem and the accuracy of the answer. Thirty high school students studying at high and regular levels of instruction in mathematics (HL and RL) were asked to solve half of the problems with ERs and half of the problems without ERs. Each task was solved by half of the students with ERs and by half of the students without ERs. We found main effects of the representation mode with particular effect on the RT and the main effects of the level of mathematical instruction and mathematical subject with particular influence on the accuracy of students’ responses. We explain our findings using the cognitive load theory and hypothesize that these findings are associated with the different cognitive processes related to geometry and algebra.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ashcraft, M. H. (1982). The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach. Developmental Review, 2, 213–236.
Babai, R., Brecher, T., Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (2006a). Intuitive interference in probabilistic reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 627–639.
Babai, R., Levyadun, T., Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (2006b). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: A reaction time study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37, 913–924.
Bobis, J., Sweller, J. & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive load effects in a primary-school geometry task. Learning and Instruction, 3, 1–21.
Cohen Kadosh, R. & Walsh, V. (2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 313–328.
Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, 343–363.
Funahashi, S. (Ed.). (2007). Representation and brain. Tokyo, Japan: Springer.
Goldin, G. & Steingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics. NCTM 2001 Yearbook (pp. 1–23). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Goldin, G. A. & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397–430). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 275–285). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Groen, G. J. & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329–343.
Hegarty, M. (2004). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In A. Blackwell, K. Mariott & A. Shimojima (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 2980 (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Springer.
Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Janvier, C. (1987). Translations processes in mathematics education. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 27–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Janvier, C., Girardon, C. & Morand, J. (1993). Mathematical symbols and representations. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 79–102). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kaput, J. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol systems of algebra. In S. Wagner (Ed.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra. NCTM: Reston, VA.
Kaput, J. (1998). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A kaleidoscope of windows. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265–281.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Larkin, J. H. & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth 10,000 words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–100.
Lesh, R., Landau, M. & Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models in applied mathematical problem solving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 263–343). New York, NY: Academic.
Lesh, R., Post, T. & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Reaction times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. & Anderson, R. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.
Mayer, R. E. & Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.
Miller, C. A. & Poll, G. H. (2009). Response time in adults with a history of language difficulties. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42(5), 365–379.
Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Standards for school mathematics. In Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Nieder, A. & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–200.
Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). New York: Wiley.
Pape, S. J. & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory in Practice, 40(2), 118–127.
Posner, M. I. & McCleod, P. (1982). Information processing models—In search of elementary operations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 477–514.
Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutirrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future. Sense: Rotterdam.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A. & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime computer software (version 1.0). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36.
Stavy, R. & Babai, R. (2008). Complexity of shapes and quantitative reasoning in geometry. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 170–176.
Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P. & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tarmizi, R. & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436.
Waisman, I., Shaul, S., Leikin, M. and Leikin, R. (2012). General ability vs. expertise in mathematics: An ERP study with male adolescents who answer geometry questions. In The electronic proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education (Topic Study Group-3: Activities and Programs for Gifted Students), (pp. 3107–3116). Seoul, Korea: Coex.
Shaul, S., Leikin, M. Waisman, I., and Leikin, R. (2012). Visual processing in algebra and geometry in mathematically excelling students: an ERP study. In The electronic proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education (Topic Study Group-16: Visualization in mathematics education) (pp. 1460–1469). Seoul, Korea: Coex.
Zhang, J. & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.
Zhang, J. J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21, 179–217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leikin, R., Leikin, M., Waisman, I. et al. EFFECT OF THE PRESENCE OF EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS ON ACCURACY AND REACTION TIME IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL DOUBLE-CHOICE PROBLEMS BY STUDENTS OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INSTRUCTION. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 11, 1049–1066 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9389-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9389-1