Abstract
The increase in demand for water has caused attention to non-traditional methods for water supply in many places. Solar still is a simple, economical and suitable technology for providing drinking water from salt water that can be used even in remote areas. The challenge facing these technologies is to increase their performance, which is possible through three ways: environmental, design and operational parameters. This research has investigated the potential and location of Iran for the installation of solar still using environmental parameters. The three parameters of ambient temperature, solar radiation intensity and wind velocity are the most important environmental parameters affecting the performance of solar still; hence, they were used to investigate the potential of Iran to install solar still. The long-term information of the desired environmental parameters was prepared using field and telemetry methods; then, by averaging each parameter in ArcGIS software, a map was prepared for the ease of analysis and review. The results show that Iran has a high potential for using solar still in terms of environmental conditions affecting the performance of solar still and having brackish water resources and the provinces of Sistan and Baluchistan, Hormozgan, Fars, Kerman and Bushehr are the most favorable places in the country. Iran has been investigated for the installation of solar still based on three parameters. Also, the results show that the provinces of Sistan and Baluchistan (2196 kWh/m2), Fars (2148 kWh/m2), Hormozgan (2136 kWh/m2), Kerman (2116 kWh/m2), and Kohkiloyeh and Boyer-Ahmad (2098 kWh/m2), are the regions with highest potentials for installation of solar based water desalination systems in Iran.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Over two-thirds are in bergs and polar ices with difficult accessibilities. In fact, < 1% of freshwater earth resources can be accessed (El-Ghonemy, 2012; Gorjian et al., 2014; Kalogirou, 2005). Lack of freshwater resources, high rate of population growth, climatic changes, agriculture and industry developments, and disproportionate dispersion of water resources have increased water demand, and it is not possible to provide this amount of demand in many areas with traditional methods. The desalination method is a relatively new method to provide part of the freshwater. Using desalination method is solution to deal with water shortage that reduces dependence on rainfall, but if fossil energy is used to provide energy, it can cause an increase in cost and environmental and biological pollution (Abbasi & Choukolaei, 2023; Abbasi et al., 2022; Cai et al., 2023; Elsheikh et al., 2022; Grubert et al., 2014; Kedar, 2021; Pourkiaei, et al., 2021; Sirohi et al., 2023).
Renewable energy sources like wind energy, solar energy, geothermal energy, etc. have been mentioned in many types of research (Compain, 2012; Gorjian et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2023; Kalogirou, 1997; Koroneos et al., 2007; Lv et al., 2023; Qiblawey & Banat, 2008) and can lead to the development of this method to provide drinking water in different regions. A kind of renewable energy that is easily accessed in many parts of the world is solar energy. Although this energy has not yet been widely exploited for the supply of humans’ required energy, it has been introduced as a reliable (Kabeel & Abdelgaied, 2018). Many areas receive average solar energy of 5–7 kWh/m2, which equals 1.7–2.2 MWh/m2 per year (Reif & Alhalabi, 2015). This amount of solar energy equals the energy derived from 1.5 oil barrels every year (Trieb & Müller-Steinhagen, 2008). Solar stills are simple and cost-effective equipment that possess proper economic (Cao et al., 2017; Hedayatizadeh, 2020; Muthusamy & Srithar, 2017). The use of solar water desalination does not have the disadvantages of using fossil energy and can increase the quality of water in remote and poor areas (Manchanda & Kumar, 2018). Developed water vapors contact the coolant surface and give rise to condensation. Condensed water is collected inside chamber of solar stills and is steered toward the system out (Ming, et al., 2017). A sample of solar stills is shown in Fig. 1.
Contrary to the solar stills benefits, low generation rate of devices has been transformed into a challenge for researchers. Solar still management can have various consequences. In Table 1, some management implications of using solar still are presented.
Solar stills efficiency depends on environmental conditions, operational factors and design parameters (Panchal & Shah, 2014, 2015; Sharshir et al., 2016). Increasing the freshwater generation rate of solar stills that are influenced by operational, three environmental and design parameters, shown in Fig. 2. Some of these studies are presented in Table 2.
Concerning the benefits of solar stills, the exploitation of this technology is a suitable approach to using renewable energies, supplying freshwater, especially in remote areas, and coping with water scarcity (Siddique et al., 2018). Thus, this technology should be investigated meticulously so that the enhancement of the generation rate would pave the way for using this technology more than ever (He et al., 2018).
Remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) are two powerful tools in the field of environmental studies and natural resource planning. Remote sensing uses devices such as laser scanners, radars and image processing computers to obtain information about features on the ground. This information includes height, slope, vegetation, soil type, climatic conditions, etc. Since this information is available in a detailed and large-scale form, it is used to create analytical and optimization models. Planning urban and rural development, planning forests and water resources, planning transportation routes, environmental monitoring, etc are among the vast applications of GIS. For example, in planning the installation of photovoltaic (PV) panels, telemetry is used to determine suitable roofs according to the slope, height, orientation and amount of sunlight. Then, using GIS, this information is placed in different maps in the form of different layers such as slope, height and vegetation. These maps are used to prepare optimization models for PV installations. Therefore, remote sensing and GIS are used as effective tools in the field of planning and environmental studies, and they can also be used as effective tools in the field of PV installation. Extensive studies were done by researchers on remote sensing and GIS (Aydin et al., 2010; Kucuksari et al., 2014; Sadeghfam & Abadi, 2021; Sánchez-Lozano et al., 2013). This research has analyzed and investigated environmental parameters affecting the role and extent of influence of each factor, and the long-term average of the most important environmental parameters in Iran as a hot and dry country with salty water resources. In this regard, the parameters affecting solar stills were first identified and prioritized; then, using remote sensing methods and weather station data, the information required for the main parameters for Iran was collected, processed and analyzed to use them to achieve the following goals:
-
Obtaining information on environmental parameters affecting solar stills, how they affect (positive or negative) and their amount.
-
Achieving the long-term average of the main environmental parameters affecting solar stills in Iran.
-
Analyzing and investigating the Iran's potential for using a solar still technology.
-
Identifying suitable places for installing solar stills in Iran.
2 Investigating environmental parameters impacting solar stills
Solar still is not independent of the location, and many environmental parameters like ambient temperature, intensity of solar radiation, wind velocity, evaporation, rainfall, etc. have a role in its performance (Refalo et al., 2014). Studies that address the environmental factors impacting solar stills and their locations have introduced many influential parameters, ambient temperature, including solar radiation intensity, wind velocity, cloudiness, dust, precipitation, air humidity, sunny hours, altitude, solar radiation angle, ambient pressure, vegetation and relative location of the Sun (Fath & Ghazy, 2002; Prakash & Velmurugan, 2015; Sarver et al., 2013; Sharshir et al., 2016). Figure 3 shows the kinds of environmental conditions impacting solar stills efficiency.
Many studies have examined these parameters effect on generation rate of solar stills. Some of these parameters have positive and some have negative effects on the generation rate of water. These impacting parameters outnumber, and examining them individually takes a long time. On the other hand, due to the indirect overlap of some effective environmental parameters and insignificant effects on generation rate of solar stills, some researchers have explored the most influential factors to achieve suitable establishment locations. Table 3 presents some of the studies conducted on the impacting environmental factors.
Many of these studies have prioritized the parameters of solar radiation intensity, wind velocity and ambient T (Mamlook & Badran, 2007) since mentioned parameters have the maximum effect on generation rate water in solar stills compared to other environmental factors. On the other hand, the investigation of some parameters, like radiation intensity, indirectly involves other parameters, such as cloudiness, dust, the relative location of the Sun and radiation angle. It is because radiation intensity is directly related to the relative location of the Sun and is indirectly related to cloudiness and radiation angle. As a result, a single parameter involves several other parameters effect. This study prioritized having a detailed look at radiation intensity effect ambient T and wind velocity and then examined briefly impact of other parameters.
2.1 Solar radiation intensity
Solar radiation is paramount environmental parameter impacting the generation rate of solar stills (Muftah et al., 2014). Many researchers have studied solar radiation effect on generation rate of solar stills. Freshwater generation rate rose with the increase in the solar radiation, and generation rate and solar radiation were directly related (Nafey et al., 2001; Taamneh & Taamneh, 2012). Selvaraj and Natarajan (2018), in their study, explained that the upsurge in solar radiation intensity increased the efficiency of solar stills. Almuhanna (2014) claimed that the rise of solar radiation intensity enhanced freshwater generation. Papanicolaou et al. (2002) reported solar radiation warmed up saline water inside desalinators and catered to energy needed for its evaporation. Guogeng et al. (2011) studied solar radiation intensity effect on generation rate of solar stills. The increase in the solar radiation intensity from 400 to 550 W/m2 raised generation rate from 900 to 1200 l/day. Put differently, this upsurge in radiation intensity increased the device efficiency by 33%. Some studies investigating solar radiation intensity effect on generation rate of solar stills are presented in Table 4.
Concerning the explained subjects and examining the effect of radiation intensity in previous studies, we can state that radiation intensity is the most important environmental parameter impacting the water generation rate in solar stills.
2.2 Ambient temperature
Ambient temperature is environmental parameter which impacts the generation rate of solar stills. Voropoulos et al. (2003) reported some environmental factors effects, like ambient T and wind velocity, differed from perspectives of different researchers. Badran (2007) and El-Sebaii (2004) explained efficiency enhancement of solar stills as possible by decreasing ambient temperature, and this factor had a reverse relationship with the efficiency of solar stills. Fath and Ghazy (2002) showed ambient temperature effect on efficiency and temperature rise was efficiency-increasing factor. The reason for these differences lies in the relationship of every environmental factor to several other parameters. In other words, the incremental or digressive effect of ambient T depends on what effect ambient T has on transmitter temperature (installed glass) since the evaporation and condensation processes take place due to T gradient between transmitter and saline water (Maoa et al., 2019). In this regard, some researchers have examined the effects of several influencing factors, like ambient T effect on T gradient, in explaining environmental factors effect. Consequently, results have not been obtained independently for the ambient temperature and reflect the effect of several factors. Another factor leading to these contradictions is the difference in the design of devices. If a device is designed that saline water reservoir is positioned outside the device, the reservoir is greatly impacted by ambient T and wind velocity, and results are influenced, too. If the reservoir is positioned within the device, this effect is by far smaller. Although there is an unclear relationship between ambient temperature and distillation efficiency, several researchers used the theoretical model (Malik et al., 1982) to explain direct relationship between efficiency and ambient T (Zubair et al., 2017). This issue has been confirmed by Al-Hinai et al. (2002), whose results showed that efficiency increased 8.2% with a 10 °C increase in ambient T and constancy of other factors. Table 5 shows examples of the conducted studies.
From the conducted investigations and the viewpoints of researchers, ambient temperature is a positive environmental parameter for increasing generation rate of solar stills. A mere reason that can reverse this claim is the reduction of T gradient between transmitter (installed glass) and temperature of saline water inside solar still, a parameter that depends on ambient temperature. As a result, if an independent selection is to be made between the incremental and digressive ambient temperatures besides the selection of a location, the priority will be a location with a high temperature. It is because there are different ways to control temperature gradient; however, ambient T is uncontrollable. By using ambient T, we can import the saline water to the device at more ideal temperatures (high temperatures) and thus enhance the generation rate (Chaichan et al., 2016).
2.3 Wind velocity
Similar to the ambient temperature, there are contradictory results concerning effect of wind velocity on efficiency of solar stills (Gorrie, 2016). Like the ambient temperature parameter, this contradiction results from wind velocity effect on other factors, like temperature gradient of saline water and transmitter (installed glass) and whether the saline water reservoir is positioned inside or outside the device. Many studies endeavored to show wind velocity effect on desalinators. Badran (2007) and El-Sebaii (2004) argued that efficiency upsurge of solar stills was possible with rise of wind velocity and had direct relationship with solar stills efficiency. Some investigations have shown a reverse relationship between these two factors. In other words, a decline in wind velocity makes the device efficiency increase (Gorrie, 2016). By investigating wind velocity effect, ambient T and water T, Refalo et al. (2014) perceived that size effect of wind velocity depended on air temperature and water flow rate, and the generation rate decreased by 8–15% when wind velocity increased from 1 to 5 m/s. In his simulation, Barron (2006) also explained that efficiency decreased 13% by increasing of wind velocity from 1 to 9 m/s. Examples of conducted studies are presented in Table 6.
The contradictory results concerning wind velocity effect on the generation rate of solar stills made some researchers conduct more comprehensive and accurate studies to discover a thorough solution. El-Sebaii (2011), in his study, delved into wind velocity effect on daily freshwater generation in active and inactive solar stills. He showed that, depending on their design and operation against wind velocity, the generation rate of these devices increased when the wind velocity was Vt, remained constant when the wind velocity increased slightly, and then decreased. Castillo-Téllez et al. (2015), in their course of study, explored wind velocity effect on generation rate of different solar stills by considering four 2.5, 3.5, 5.5 and 6 m/s velocities. Their results disclose that the optimal generation rate emerged in velocity 3.5 m/s, almost remained constant up to 5.5 m/s, and declined in higher velocities. They introduced the velocity of 3.5 m/s as the optimal rate of wind velocity in many different models of solar stills. Cao et al., (2020) also investigated environmental factors effect on water generation rate. Table 7 displays results of their study and shows an optimum wind velocity existence in solar stills.
Now that wind velocity effect on generation rate of solar stills has been illuminated, it can be argued that the discovery of an optimum wind velocity in every solar still needs empirical experiments and simulations. After this optimal value is obtained, those locations that have annual velocity averages smaller than the optimal wind velocity should be selected. If a general conclusion is to be drawn about locating solar stills for the environmental factor of wind velocity, it can be claimed that since wind is an uncontrollable and fluctuating environmental factor, whose optimum magnitude is small in solar stills, the establishment of the device in low-wind regions assists with the enhancement of the generation rate when the wind velocity increases by the optimal point. On the other hand, in locations wherein the average annual wind velocities are small, a few hours experience wind velocity higher than the optimal value. Thus, the generation rate is overshadowed, a factor that helps with the efficiency of the device. Sites with slow winds are prioritized in the locating of sites with optimal wind velocity.
2.4 The degree of influence of environmental parameters
For the locating of environmental factors, many studies have investigated factors like ambient T, solar radiation intensity and wind velocity, since these three factors have the maximum effect on generation rate of solar stills, and other factors effect is insignificant. On the other hand, other parameters have indirect effects on generation rate of solar stills. They often impact these three main parameters and increase or decrease them. Therefore, the examination of these three main parameters encompasses many of these factors (Azooz & Younis, 2016; Gherboudj & Ghedira, 2016). In this respect, Mamlook and Badran (2007), in their study, investigated size effect of operational, different design and environmental parameters. Regarding environmental factors, they showed that solar radiation intensity effects, ambient T, wind velocity and other environmental parameters on generation rate of solar stills were 56%, 16%, 15% and 13%, respectively. In other words, 3 parameters of ambient T, radiation intensity and wind velocity include 87% of environmental factors impact, and other environmental parameters such as cloud cover, dust, rainfall, air humidity, amount of sunshine hours, altitude above sea level, degree of solar radiation, ambient pressure, vegetation and the relative position of the sun have only 13% effect, which is time-consuming to investigate, and due to the small effect of these factors, they were omitted in this research. Figure 4 shows environmental parameters effect on solar stills performance.
3 Area under study
With an area of 1,648,195 km2, Iran is located between 45° and 63° E and 25° and 40° N in the Middle East in semiarid and arid area of world (Castillo-Téllez et al., 2015). Water consumption in 1963 equaled 4.44 bm3 in Iran. This rate increased in 1993 to 83 bm3, 93.36 billion m3 in 2006 and over 96 billion m3 in 2019 (Zehtabian & Amiraslani, 2006). According to statistics, 59.5% of the consumed drinking water of the country is supplied by underground waters and 40.5% by surface waters. This high consumption rate of underground waters reduces the level of these resources and will intensify the water crisis in the country in the long run (Hamshahri News Agency, 2018). Figure 5 displays the map of Iran and Middle East.
Desalination of seawater and saline water resources of country is potential approach to supplying water balance and demand in Iran. It is because the country is surrounded with 3 main saline water resources, including Caspian Sea in the north and Persian Gulf and Oman Sea in southern boundaries. In this regard, 120 million m3 of freshwater is supplied by traditional desalination plants in southern coastal regions of the country.
4 Research methods
In this section, after identifying and choosing the most important parameters affecting of solar stills performance, how to obtain information needed for the analysis and investigation of Iran was discussed. Two kinds of data have been employed in the relevant conducted studies. Some of these studies have used field data (Fath et al., 2003; Mohamed, 2020; Mwamburi, 2013) and some others the remote sensing method (Afgan & Darwish, 2011; Delgado et al., 2020). Field data are obtained by field measurement and the use of specific instruments. To this end, researchers can personally record information or employ the available information in meteorological stations (synoptic stations). Field measurements are accurate and reliable; however, high human force and equipment costs, lack of stations in all locations, unavailability of all measurement devices in some stations and inaccessibility to multi-year data in some stations are among the drawbacks of this method. Another method for measuring environmental parameters is remote sensing, which is fulfilled by satellites and UAVs. Of the merits of this sort of measurement, we can refer to its integrity, access to all regions, easy access, low cost, proper accuracy, observable scope and, above all, high-accurate zoning potential (almost 90%). The information acquired by both methods can be accessed in the form of a map or an image of the entertained location with the help of available software so that this information can be analyzed and checked easily. ArcGIS software was used for this purpose. This type of software is a type of Geographic Information System that is used to review and prepare geographic information and maps. The data required for this research were collected according to the stated contents as follows:
-
Radiation intensity
To analyze and check solar radiation intensity in country, a remotely sensed and processed map of solar radiation intensity in years 1999–2018, which was the last map available until this moment, was prepared through SolarGis with the unit kWh/m2 (The World Bank, 2019).
-
Environment temperature
To check the temperature in the country of Iran, the necessary information from the remote sensing method was obtained from SolarGis in the form of necessary data for the period of 1998–2018. The mentioned data were converted into a comprehensive map of the country with the temperature unit of °C using ArcGIS 10.7.1 software (The World Bank, 2019).
-
Wind velocity
To check the wind velocity in the country, a map was prepared using the field data of 83 meteorological stations of the whole country as an average of 14 years from 2006 to 2019 and ARC GIS software with the IDW zoning method and m/s unit (Meteorological Organization of Iran, 2019).
-
Prioritizing and scoring criteria
The prioritization of the criteria was determined according to the opinion of experts and professors in Iran. In this way, each of the experts prioritized the criteria based on their importance in measuring the potential of installing solar panels compared to other criteria. Then, using the AHP method, pairwise comparison of the criteria was done and weighting of the options was done and the final weight of the criteria was determined. Table 8 shows the preference scores in the pairwise comparison scale (Kurttila et al., 2000).
By performing pairwise comparisons by the problem analysis team in the previous step, a relative preference was obtained for each of the factors within the groups, and the relative weight of each criterion was determined as a result of the pairwise comparison in this step, which has the ability to be compared (Kurttila et al., 2000). Finally, the final weight of each factor was obtained in the AHP model. Pairwise comparison of criteria with each other and extraction of relative weight, final weight and incompatibility coefficient were done in Expert Choice 11 software. The valuation of the considered parameters is presented in Table 9.
5 Results and discussion
5.1 Investigating solar radiation intensity in Iran
Solar radiation intensity differed in varying locations, and the monthly and yearly reception rates of solar radiation recorded in the country ranged from 3.8 to 6.2 kWh/m2 and 21,387 to 2264 kWh/m2, respectively. Long-term average of solar radiation intensity in Iran is shown in Fig. 6 on an annual and daily basis. The northern areas of Iran had the least rate of solar radiation reception, which gradually increased toward the southern part of the country. Likewise, when we moved from the west to the east of the country, solar radiation incremented. Maximum energy received daily from Sun is 6.2 kWh/m2, which equals 7.4 kWh/m2 in world and indicates proper potential of solar energy in country. The provinces of Gilan, Mazandaran and Golestan, respectively, have the least and Sistan and Baluchistan, Fars, Hormozgan, Kerman and Kohkiloyeh and Boyar Ahmad provinces, respectively, have the most sunlight and are more suitable for using a solar still than other provinces of the country in terms of sunlight. Table 10 shows the average long-term radiation intensity of the country's provinces.
5.2 Investigating temperature in Iran
Due to being an extended country, the country’s temperature varied in its different points, and the average temperature ranged from − 5 to 30 °C during these years. The minimum recorded temperature was related to the southern line, center and east of the country. As Fig. 7 depicts, the highest temperature in the country is related to Hormozgan, Bushehr, Khuzestan, Sistan and Baluchistan and Ilam, respectively. These regions are thermally more suitable than other areas of the country for establishing solar stills. The long-term average temperature of Iran is shown in Table 11.
5.3 Investigating wind velocity in Iran
Figure 8 shows wind velocity zoning in the country in combination with the location of the meteorological stations. In many areas of the country, average wind velocity was in 2.3–5.5 m/s and 1.5–2.5 m/s ranges, and the wind velocity was only > 5.5 m/s in northern Sistan and Baluchestan. Based on the studies that investigated wind velocity effect on efficiency of solar stills, it is concluded that regions with wind velocities of < 3.5 m/s are suitable for establishing solar stills. In this regard, the regions with wind velocities of 2.3–5.5 m/s and < 2.3 m/s are prioritized, respectively. As a result, major parts of the country are suitable for establishing solar stills in terms of wind velocity, except for the eastern part of south Khorasan, central Ardebil, Hormozgan, eastern Kerman, and the north and west of Sistan and Baluchestan, all enjoying the maximum wind velocity means. The long-term average wind velocity is shown in Table 12.
5.4 Iran's potential for installing solar still
Examining the parameters of ambient T, radiation intensity and wind velocity as main environmental parameters affecting performance of solar still in Iran showed that this country has a suitable capacity to use this technology. The favorable environmental conditions of Iran, along with the presence of saltwater resources in the sea and underground resources, provide a good potential for this country to use a solar still technologies. Based on the investigations, influence factor of wind velocity and ambient T on performance of solar still is equal and influence intensity factor of solar radiation is three times the other two parameters. In this regard, the provinces of the country were rated from 6 to 1 according to the maximum intensity of radiation, ambient T and favorable wind velocity. Now, by scoring each province according to each parameter and the effect of the coefficient of each parameter, it is possible to identify the most suitable provinces of Iran for installing solar still, which is shown in Table 13 and Fig. 9.
The final results of the investigations show that the provinces of Sistan and Baluchistan, Hormozgan, Fars, Kerman and Bushehr, respectively, have more favorable environmental conditions for installing solar still than other provinces of Iran. It is suggested that in future research for the installation of solar still, the focus should be on these provinces and the location within each province should be considered.
6 Conclusion
Considering the increasing demand for water consumption, the traditional methods of water supply, especially in dry and hot regions of world, which are facing water shortages, do not meet human needs. Therefore, the supply of drinking water from alternative methods such as the use of saltwater was interest in recent years. Solar stills are simple and cost-effective equipment with good economic, environmental and social benefits that use solar energy to provide energy required for desalination. Considering availability of solar energy in many places, this technology can be used in the preparation of fresh and quality water. Weather conditions, incoming water quality and installation location are some of the limitations of solar water softeners. Solar stills require the temperature of the sun and direct sunlight. For this reason, the efficiency of these devices decreases in cloudy and rainy conditions, as well as in places where the direct contact of sunlight with desalination water is less. The management of solar still can have various consequences including reducing water costs, increasing productivity, simple maintenance and environmental sustainability. One of the obstacles to the use of these technologies is increasing their performance, which has been addressed in many studies. Increasing the performance of these technologies depends on three design factors, operating conditions and environmental conditions. In this regard, this study investigated the environmental conditions affecting solar still in Iran. The conducted studies show that the three parameters of solar radiation intensity, ambient T and wind velocity are most important environmental parameters affecting performance of solar still with 56%, 16% and 15%, respectively. The long-term information of the desired environmental parameters was prepared using field and telemetry methods; then, by averaging each parameter in ArcGIS software, a map was prepared for ease the of analysis and review. The research results showed:
-
Provinces of Sistan and Baluchistan, Fars, Hormozgan, Kerman, and Kohkiloyeh and Boyer-Ahmad have received the highest radiation energy in the long-term average in Iran by receiving 2196, 2148, 2136, 2116 and 2098 kWh/m2, respectively.
-
The provinces of Hormozgan (25.7 °C), Bushehr (25.5 °C), Khuzestan (24.9 °C), Sistan and Baluchistan (24 °C) and Ilam (21 °C), respectively, had the highest long-term average temperature in Iran.
-
The provinces of Sistan and Baluchistan, Hormozgan, Kerman, Bushehr and Khuzestan have more suitable wind velocities to increase solar still efficiency.
-
Iran has high potential for using solar still in terms of environmental conditions affecting of solar still performance and having saline water sources.
-
The provinces of Sistan and Baluchistan, Hormozgan, Fars, Kerman and Bushehr are, respectively, the most favorable places in Iran for installing solar stills.
It is suggested that in future research for the installation of solar still, the focus should be on these provinces and the location within each province should be considered.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abbasi, S., & Choukolaei, H. A. (2023). A systematic review of green supply chain network design literature focusing on carbon policy. Decision Analytics Journal 100189.
Abbasi, S., Khalili, H. A., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2022). Performance measurement of the sustainable supply chain during the COVID-19 pandemic: A real-life case study. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 47(4), 327–358.
Abujazar, M. S. S., Fatihah, S., & Kabeel, A. E. (2017). Seawater desalination using inclined stepped solar still with copper trays in a wet tropical climate. Desalination, 423, 141–148.
Afgan, N. H., & Darwish, M. (2011). Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of water desalination and energy systems—Kuwait case. Desalination and Water Treatment, 25(1–3), 241–250.
Ahsan, A., et al. (2014). Parameters affecting the performance of a low cost solar still. Applied Energy, 114, 924–930.
Aldoori, W. H., Ahmed, A. H., & Ahmed, A. M. (2020). Performance investigation of a solar water distiller integrated with a parabolic collector using fuzzy technique. Heat Transfer Asian Research, 49(1), 120–134.
Al-Hinai, H., Al-Nassri, M. S., & Jubran, B. A. (2002). Effect of climatic, design and operational parameters on the yield of a simple solar still. Energy Conversion and Management, 43(13), 1639–1650.
Almuhanna, E. A. (2014). Evaluation of single slop solar still integrated with evaporative cooling system for brackish water desalination. Journal of Agricultural Science (toronto), 6(1), 48–58.
Al-Nimr, M. A., & Qananba, K. S. (2018). A solar hybrid thermoelectric generator and distillation system. International Journal of Green Energy, 15(8), 473–488.
Al-Othman, A., et al. (2018). Novel multi-stage flash (MSF) desalination plant driven by parabolic trough collectors and a solar pond: A simulation study in UAE. Desalination, 443, 237–244.
Amin, I., et al. (2020). Conceptual design and numerical analysis of a novel floating desalination plant powered by marine renewable energy for Egypt. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(2), 95.
Aydin, F., & Sarptas, H. (2020). Spatial assessment of site suitability for solar desalination plants: A case study of the coastal regions of Turkey. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 22(2), 309–323.
Aydin, N. Y., Kentel, E., & Duzgun, S. (2010). GIS-based environmental assessment of wind energy systems for spatial planning: A case study from Western Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 364–373.
Azooz, A. A., & Younis, G. G. (2016). Effect of glass inclination angle on solar still performance. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 8(3), 033702.
Badran, O. O. (2007). Experimental study of the enhancement parameters on a single slope solar still productivity. Desalination, 209, 136–143.
Bait, O. (2019). Exergy, environ–economic and economic analyses of a tubular solar water heater assisted solar still. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 630–646.
Barron, O. (2006). Desalination options and their possible implementation in Western Australia: Potential role for CSIRO Land and Water.
Cai, Y., Wu, J., Shi, S. Q., Li, J., & Kim, K.-H. (2023). Advances in desalination technology and its environmental and economic assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 397, 136498.
Cao, F., et al. (2017). Design and simulation of a solar double-chimney power plant. Renewable Energy, 113, 764–773.
Cao, F., Liu, Q., & Xiao, H. (2020). Experimental study of a humidification-dehumidification seawater desalination system combined with the chimney. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2020, 1–9.
Castillo-Téllez, M., et al. (2015). Experimental study on the air velocity effect on the efficiency and fresh water production in a forced convective double slope solar still. Applied Thermal Engineering, 75, 1192–1200.
Chaichan, M. T., Abaas, K. I., & Kazem, H. A. (2016). Design and assessment of solar concentrator distillating system using phase change materials (PCM) suitable for desertic weathers. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(32), 14897–14907.
Colmenar-Santos, A., et al. (2020). Thermal desalination potential with parabolic trough collectors and geothermal energy in the Spanish southeast. Applied Energy, 262, 114433.
Compain, P. (2012). Solar energy for water desalination. Procedia Engineering, 46, 220–227.
Daneshvar, M. R., Mansouri, M. E., & Nejadsoleymani, H. (2019). An overview of climate change in Iran: Facts and statistics. Environmental Systems Research, 8(1), 7.
Delgado, W. R., Beach, T., & Luzzadder-Beach, S. (2020). Solar desalination: Cases, synthesis, and challenges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 7(3), e1434.
Dimri, V., et al. (2008). Effect of condensing cover material on yield of an active solar still: An experimental validation. Desalination, 227(1–3), 178–189.
Dweiri, F., Khan, S. A., & Almulla, A. (2018). A multi-criteria decision support system to rank sustainable desalination plant location criteria. Desalination, 444, 26–34.
El-Ghonemy, A. M. K. (2012). Retracted: Water desalination systems powered by renewable energy sources, Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1537–1556.
El-Sebaii, A. A. (2004). Effect of wind velocity on active and passive solar stills. Energy Conversion and Management, 45, 1187–1204.
El-Sebaii, A. A. (2011). On effect of wind velocity on passive solar still performance based on inner/outer surface temperatures of the glass cover. Energy, 36(8), 4943–4949.
Elsheikh, A. H., et al. (2022). Low-cost bilayered structure for improving the performance of solar stills: Performance/cost analysis and water yield prediction using machine learning. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 49, 101783.
Elzahaby, A. M., et al. (2016). Direct contact membrane water distillation assisted with solar energy. Energy Conversion and Management, 110, 397–406.
Fath, H. E. S., et al. (2003). Thermal-economic analysis and comparison between pyramid-shaped and single-slope solar still configurations. Desalination, 159(1), 69–79.
Fath, H. E. S., & Ghazy, A. (2002). Solar desalination using humidification—Dehumidification technology. Desalination, 142(2), 119–133.
Feilizadeh, M., et al. (2016). Effects of water and basin depths in single basin solar stills: An experimental and theoretical study. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository, 122, 174–181.
Gang, W., et al. (2016). Experimental investigation of a multi-effect isothermal heat with tandem solar desalination system based on humidification–dehumidification processes. Desalination, 378, 100–107.
Garg, H. P. (2000). Solar energy: Fundamentals and applications. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Gherboudj, I., & Ghedira, H. (2016). Assessment of solar energy potential over the United Arab Emirates using remote sensing and weather forecast data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1210–1224.
Gorjian, S., Hashjin, T. T., & Ghobadian, B. (2011). Seawater desalination using solar thermal technologies: State of the art. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on sustainable energy technologies.
Gorjian, S., et al. (2014). Experimental performance evaluation of a stand-alone point-focus parabolic solar still. Desalination, 352, 1–17.
Gorrie, A. (2016). Optimisation of solar desalination process: An investigation of the critical parameters affecting solar still water production in the context of a developing country.
Grubert, E. A., Stillwell, A. S., & Webber, M. E. (2014). Where does solar-aided seawater desalination make sense? A method for identifying sustainable sites. Desalination, 339, 10–17.
Hamshahri News Agency. (2018). hamshahrionline.ir/x5vtN.
He, W. F., Han, D., & Ji, C. (2018). Investigation on humidification dehumidification desalination system coupled with heat pump. Desalination, 436, 152–160.
Hedayatizadeh, M., Sarhaddi, F., & Pugsley, A. (2020). A detailed thermal modeling of a passive single-slope solar still with improved accuracy. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 11, 100384.
Huang, N., Zhao, X., Guo, Y., Cai, G., & Wang, R. (2023). Distribution network expansion planning considering a distributed hydrogen-thermal storage system based on photovoltaic development of the Whole County of China. Energy, 278, 1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127761
Islam, M., Sultana, A., Saadat, A., Shammi, M., & Uddin, M. (2018). Desalination technologies for developing countries: A review. Journal of Scientific Research, 10, 77–97.
Ithape, P. K., Barve, S. B., & Nadgire, A. R. (2017). Climatic and design parameters effects on the productivity of solar stills: A review. International Journal of Current Engineering and Scientific Research, 4, 17–23.
Jafari, S., et al. (2022). Geographical preference for installation of solar still water desalination technologies in Iran: An analytical hierarchy process (AHP)-based answer. Water, 14(2), 265.
Kabeel, A. E., & Abdelgaied, M. (2018). Experimental evaluation of a two-stage indirect solar dryer with reheating coupled with HDH desalination system for remote areas. Desalination, 425, 22–29.
Kalita, P., Borah, S., & Das, D. (2017). Design and performance evaluation of a novel solar distillation unit. Desalination, 416, 65–75.
Kalogirou, S. (1997). Survey of solar desalination systems and system selection. Energy, 22(1), 69–81.
Kalogirou, S. A. (2005). Seawater desalination using renewable energy sources. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 31(3), 242–281.
Kaviti, A. K., Kumar, A., & Prakash, O. (2019). Effect of design parameters on productivity of various passive solar stills. Solar Desalination Technology 49–73.
Kedar, S. A., et al. (2021). Effect of reflecting material on CPC to improve the performance of hybrid groundwater solar desalination system. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2021, 1–13.
Keshtkar, M., Eslami, M., & Jafarpur, K. (2020). Effect of design parameters on performance of passive basin solar stills considering instantaneous ambient conditions: A transient CFD modeling. Solar Energy, 201, 884–907.
Khalifa, A. J. N. (2011). On the effect of cover tilt angle of the simple solar still on its productivity in different seasons and latitudes. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(1), 431–436.
Kien, Q. V., An. Q. H., & Le Chi, H. (2018). Optimizing the operating parameters of the humidification-dehumidification desalination system by pinch technology. In 2018 4th international conference on green technology and sustainable development (GTSD). IEEE, 2018.
Koroneos, C., Dompros, A., & Roumbas, G. (2007). Renewable energy driven desalination systems modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(5), 449–464.
Kucuksari, S., Khaleghi, A. M., Hamidi, M., Zhang, Y., Szidarovszky, F., Bayraksan, G., & Son, Y. J. (2014). An integrated GIS, optimization and simulation framework for optimal PV size and location in campus area environments. Applied Energy, 113, 1601–1613.
Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—A hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41–52.
Lv, S., Zhang, B., Ji, Y., Ren, J., Yang, J., Lai, Y., & Chang, Z. (2023). Comprehensive research on a high performance solar and radiative cooling driving thermoelectric generator system with concentration for passive power generation. Energy, 275, 127390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127390
Mahmoudi, H., et al. (2009). Assessment of wind energy to power solar brackish water greenhouse desalination units: A case study from Algeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(8), 2149–2155.
Mahmoudi, H., et al. (2010). Application of geothermal energy for heating and fresh water production in a brackish water greenhouse desalination unit: A case study from Algeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 512–517.
Malik, M. A. S., et al. (1982). Solar distillation: A practical study of a wide range of stills and their optimum design, construction, and performance. Pergamon Press.
Mamlook, R., & Badran, O. (2007). Fuzzy sets implementation for the evaluation of factors affecting solar still production. Desalination, 203(1–3), 394–402.
Manchanda, H., & Kumar, M. (2018). Study of water desalination techniques and a review on active solar distillation methods. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 37(1), 444–464.
Maoa, Z., et al. (2019). Development of a miniature low-temperature solar seawater desalination device. Desalination and Water Treatment, 170, 24–37.
Meteorological Organization of Iran. (2019). https://www.irimo.ir.
Ming, T., et al. (2017). Numerical analysis of seawater desalination based on a solar chimney power plant. Applied Energy, 208, 1258–1273.
Mohamed, S. A. (2020). Application of geo-spatial Analytical Hierarchy Process and multi-criteria analysis for site suitability of the desalination solar stations in Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 164, 103767.
Muftah, A. F., et al. (2014). Factors affecting basin type solar still productivity: A detailed review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 430–447.
Muthusamy, C., & Srithar, K. (2017). Energy saving potential in humidification-dehumidification desalination system. Energy, 118, 729–741.
Mwamburi, E. K. (2013). Factors affecting access of water supply in Kisauni area, Mombasa county, Kenya. Diss.
Nafey, A. S., et al. (2000). Parameters affecting solar still productivity. Energy Conversion and Management, 41(16), 1797–1809.
Nafey, A. S., et al. (2001). Solar still productivity enhancement. Energy Conversion and Management, 42(11), 1401–1408.
Ozuomba, J. O., et al. (2017). Design and determination of the efficiency of a slanting-type solar water distillation kit. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 36(2), 643–647.
Panchal, H. N., & Patel, S. (2016). Effect of various parameters on augmentation of distillate output of solar still: A review. Technology and Economics of Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy, 1, 1–8.
Panchal, H. N., & Shah, P. K. (2014). Improvement of solar still productivity by energy absorbing plates. Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment, 1(1), 1–7.
Panchal, H. N., & Shah, P. K. (2015). Enhancement of upper basin distillate output by attachment of vacuum tubes with double-basin solar still. Desalination and Water Treatment, 55(3), 587–595.
Papanicolaou, E., Voropoulos, K., & Belessiotis, V. (2002). Natural convective heat transfer in an asymmetric greenhouse-type solar still–effect of angle of inclination. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part a: Applications, 42(8), 855–880.
Parsa, S. M., et al. (2020). First approach on nanofluid-based solar still in high altitude for water desalination and solar water disinfection (SODIS). Desalination, 491, 114592.
Pourkiaei, S., et al. (2021). Status of direct and indirect solar desalination methods: Comprehensive review. The European Physical Journal plus, 136(5), 1–36.
Prakash, P., & Velmurugan, V. (2015). Parameters influencing the productivity of solar stills—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 585–609.
Pugsley, A., et al. (2016). Global applicability of solar desalination. Renewable Energy, 88, 200–219.
Qiblawey, H. M., & Banat, F. (2008). Solar thermal desalination technologies. Desalination, 220(1–3), 633–644.
Refalo, P., Ghirlando, R., & Abela, S. (2014). The effect of climatic parameters on the heat transfer mechanisms in a solar distillation still. Heat Transfer Engineering, 35(16–17), 1473–1481.
Reif, J. H., & Alhalabi, W. (2015). Solar-thermal powered desalination: Its significant challenges and potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 152–165.
Sadeghfam, S., & Abadi, B. (2021). Decision-making process of partnership in establishing and managing of rural wastewater treatment plants: Using intentional and geographical-spatial location data. Water Research, 197, 117096.
Salim, M. G. (2012). Selection of groundwater sites in Egypt, using geographic information systems, for desalination by solar energy in order to reduce greenhouse gases. Journal of Advanced Research, 3(1), 11–19.
Sánchez-Lozano, J. M., Teruel-Solano, J., Soto-Elvira, P. L., & García-Cascales, M. S. (2013). Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 544–556.
Sarver, T., Al-Qaraghuli, A., & Kazmerski, L. L. (2013). A comprehensive review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: History, investigations, results, literature, and mitigation approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 698–733.
Selvaraj, K., & Natarajan, A. (2018). Factors influencing the performance and productivity of solar stills—A review. Desalination, 435, 181–187.
Sharon, H., & Reddy, K. S. (2014). A review of solar energy driven desalination technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41(2015), 1080–1118.
Sharshir, S. W., et al. (2016). Factors affecting solar stills productivity and improvement techniques: A detailed review. Applied Thermal Engineering, 100, 267–284.
Siddique, M., et al. (2018). Small-scale low pressure ‘single effect distillation’ and ‘single stage flash’ solar driven barometric desalination units: A comparative analysis. Desalination, 444, 53–62.
Sirohi, R., Kumar, Y., Madhavan, A., Sagar, N. A., Sindhu, R., Bharatiraja, B., Pandey, H. O., & Tarafdar, A. (2023). Engineered nanomaterials for water desalination: Trends and challenges. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 30, 103108.
Suárez, F., & Urtubia, R. (2016). Tackling the water-energy nexus: An assessment of membrane distillation driven by salt-gradient solar ponds. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(6), 1697–1712.
Taamneh, Y., & Taamneh, M. M. (2012). Performance of pyramid-shaped solar still: Experimental study. Desalination, 291, 65–68.
The World Bank. (2019). Source: Global Solar Atlas 2.0, Solar resource data: Solargis. https://solargis.com.
Tiwari, A. K., & Tiwari, G. N. (2006). Effect of water depths on heat and mass transfer in a passive solar still: In summer climatic condition. Desalination, 195(1–3), 78–94.
Trieb, F., & Müller-Steinhagen, H. (2008). Concentrating solar power for seawater desalination in the Middle East and North Africa. Desalination, 220(1–3), 165–183.
Voropoulos, K., Mathioulakis, E., & Belessiotis, V. (2003). Experimental investigation of the behavior of a solar still coupled with hot water storage tank. Desalination, 156, 315–322.
Xu, H., & Dai, Y. J. (2019). Parameter analysis and optimization of a two-stage solar assisted heat pump desalination system based on humidification-dehumidification process. Solar Energy, 187, 185–198.
Yuan, G., et al. (2011). Experimental study of a solar desalination system based on humidification–dehumidification process. Desalination, 277(1–3), 92–98.
Zehtabian, G., & Amiraslani, F. (2006). The investigation on the reasons for salinization of soil and water in Iranian desert lands. In First international conference on water, ecosystems and sustainable development in arid and semi-arid zones, Urumqi, China, October 19–25, 2006.
Zubair, M. I., et al. (2017). Performance and cost assessment of solar driven humidification dehumidification desalination system. Energy Conversion and Management, 132, 28–39.
Zurigat, Y. H., & Abu-Arabi, M. K. (2004). Modelling and performance analysis of a regenerative solar desalination unit. Applied Thermal Engineering, 24(7), 1061–1072.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hemmat Esfe, M., Vaisi, V., Hosseini Tamrabad, S. et al. A comprehensive review of the effective environmental parameters on the efficiency and suitable site selection for installing solar based water desalination systems in Iran. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03848-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03848-z