Abstract
Tributyltin chloride (TBTC)- and lead-resistant estuarine bacterium from Mandovi estuary, Goa, India was isolated and identified as Aeromonas caviae strain KS-1 based on biochemical characteristics and FAME analysis. It tolerates TBTC and lead up to 1.0 and 1.4 mM, respectively, in the minimal salt medium (MSM) supplemented with 0.4 % glucose. Scanning electron microscopy clearly revealed a unique morphological pattern in the form of long inter-connected chains of bacterial cells on exposure to 1 mM TBTC, whereas cells remained unaltered in presence of 1.4 mM Pb(NO3)2 but significant biosorption of lead (8 %) on the cell surface of this isolate was clearly revealed by scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. SDS-PAGE analysis of whole-cell proteins of this lead-resistant isolate interestingly demonstrated three lead-induced proteins with molecular mass of 15.7, 16.9 and 32.4 kDa, respectively, when bacterial cells were grown under the stress of 1.4 mM Pb (NO3)2. This clearly demonstrated their possible involvement exclusively in lead resistance. A. caviae strain KS-1 also showed tolerance to several other heavy metals, viz. zinc, cadmium, copper and mercury. Therefore, we can employ this TBTC and lead-resistant bacterial isolate for lead bioremediation and also for biomonitoring TBTC from lead and TBTC contaminated environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Environmental contamination by toxic heavy metals and organometals has become a major global concern as they pose a serious threat to the biota along with humans (Nehru and Kaushal 1992; Hernandez et al. 1998; Nies 1999; Cerebasi and Yetis 2001; Hartwing et al. 2002; Dubey and Roy 2003; Dubey et al. 2006). Heavy metal and organometallic pollutants, viz. Pb, Hg, Cd, tributyltin, triphenyltin and tetraethyl lead contaminate the environment from various anthropogenic sources such as industrial wastes, effluents, shipyard wastes, automobile emissions, mining drainage and agricultural wastes. Toxic heavy metals, viz. Hg, Cd and Pb are persistent in the environment which ultimately results in bioaccumulation, causing DNA damage, oxidative damage to proteins and lipids as they bind to essential proteins, lipids and metabolic enzymes (Nies 1999; Asmub et al. 2000; Hartwing et al. 2002). Therefore, these toxic metals are included as hazardous wastes in the list of priority pollutants by Environmental Protection Agency of USA (Cameron 1992).
Bioremediation is environmental friendly, economically viable and highly efficient technique as compared to physicochemical methods to clean up environmental sites polluted with potentially hazardous heavy metals (Gadd and White 1993). Bacteria need to develop different mechanisms to survive in extreme environmental conditions such as heavy metal stress. General resistant mechanisms to counteract heavy metals and organometals include energy-dependent efflux, enzymatic detoxification, bioaccumulation, biosorption, precipitation and sequestration (Gadd 1990; Nies et al.1995; Pain and Cooney 1998; Levinson and Mahler 1998; Nies 1999; Roane 1999; Canovas et al. 2003; Dubey and Roy 2003; Dubey et al. 2006; Cruz et al. 2007; Martinez et al. 2007; Taghavi et al. 2009; Naik and Dubey 2011).
Bacteria show resistance to multiple heavy metals since bacterial genomes possess multiple open reading frames involved in conferring resistance to wide range of metals (Canovas et al. 2003). Expression of bacterial stress induced proteins in response to stress stimuli, viz. heavy metals and organometalic toxicants and their role in resistance is well-known (Dubey et al. 2006; Sharma et al. 2006; Ramachandran and Dubey 2009). Bacterial isolates have been reported to exhibit alteration in cell morphology in response to environmental stresses, viz. toxic heavy metals, temperature and organic compounds (Shi and Xia 2003; Neumann et al. 2005; Chakravarty and Banerjee 2008; Naik and Dubey 2011). Modification in cell envelopes gives adaptive advantage to microbes to survive under extreme environmental conditions (Neumann et al. 2005). Bacterial strains resistant to Tributyltin were also found resistant to multiple heavy metals, viz. Hg, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb (Dubey and Roy 2003; Pain and Cooney 1998; Cruz et al. 2007).
The present communication focuses on screening and identification of highly lead- and TBTC-resistant estuarine bacterial isolate and its possible resistance mechanisms, viz. biosorption, synthesis of lead-induced proteins and alteration in cell morphology along with resistance to mercury, cadmium, copper and zinc and multiple antibiotics.
Materials and methods
Isolation of lead-resistant bacterial strain
Lead-resistant bacterial strain was isolated from surface water sample of Mandovi estuary Goa, India. Water sample was serially diluted and plated on Zobell marine agar (Zobell 1941) amended with 0.5 mM Pb(NO3)2. Bacterial colonies appeared on the ZMA plate were further streaked on mineral salt medium (MSM) with varying concentration of lead nitrate (0.2–1.6 mM). Slight modification in the composition of MSM was done by replacing inorganic phosphate with 0.4 mM β- glycerol phosphate to avoid lead precipitation. Discrete bacterial colony growing at highest lead level was selected for identification and further biological characterization.
Identification of the bacterial strain
Identification of selected highly lead-resistant bacterial strain was done on the basis of morphological and biochemical characteristics according to Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Krieg and Holt 1984) and this strain was designated as KS -1. This strain was also confirmed by FAME analysis (Sherlock version 6.0B)
Growth behaviour of the bacterial strain under lead and TBTC stress
Lead and TBTC resistance of bacterial strain KS-1 was determined by its growth in mineral salt medium supplemented with 0.4 % glucose and different concentrations of lead and TBTC separately at 28 ± 2 °C and pH 7.5 with constant shaking at 150 rpm. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined as the lowest concentration of lead or TBTC at which no visible growth of test bacterium was observed. Growth behaviour of the bacterial isolate under stress of lead and TBTC separately was studied by recording absorbance at 600 nm at definite time intervals using UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Model –UV 2450, Japan). Tolerance of the test bacterium to other heavy metals, viz. CuSO4, ZnSO4, HgCl2 and CdSO4 was also determined in MSM (HiMedia, India).
SDS-PAGE analysis of whole-cell proteins of bacterial strain exposed to lead
Whole-cell protein profile of the bacterial isolate exposed to 1.4 mM lead nitrate was determined by whole-cell protein extraction and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis (Laemmli 1970; Sambrook et al. 1989). Cells grown without lead nitrate served as control. Protein gels were stained with 0.25 % Coomassie Brilliant Blue-250 for 2 h and destained overnight with destaining solution (methanol/acetic acid/distilled water, 40:10:50).
Morphological characterization of the bacterial strain
Alteration in cell morphology and lead biosorption of the bacterial isolate grown under the stress of TBTC and Pb(NO3)2, respectively, was studied separately using scanning electron microscope coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) ( Naik and Dubey 2011). Cultures (both control and stressed) in the exponential growth phase were harvested at 8,000 rpm for 10 min and washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Cells were fixed with (2.5 % v/v) glutaraldehyde on glass cover slip in the same buffer and kept overnight at room temperature. Cells were washed with PBS prior to dehydration using different concentrations of ethanol, i.e. 10, 20, 40, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 95 % and absolute ethanol for 10 min each. The Scanning electron microscope (model-JEOL JSM-6360 LV) was used to observe alteration in cell morphology and lead adsorption on the cell surface was recorded by EDX microanalysis.
Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strain
Susceptibility of the bacterial strain to common antibiotics was tested by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method (Bauer et al. 1966), using Mueller-Hinton agar and antibiotic discs (HiMedia, India).
Results
Identification of the bacterial strain
The bacterial strain KS-1 isolated from water sample of Mandovi estuary Goa, India was gram negative, motile, rod shaped and oxidative. This isolate also showed presence of various enzymes, viz. oxidase, catalase, nitrate reductase, and β-galactosidase and could utilise citrate. The strain was negative for indole, methyl red, Voges–Proskauer, ornithine utilisation and urease. Based on these biochemical characteristics and following Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Krieg and Holt 1984) and fatty acid methyl ester analysis, this bacterial strain KS-1 was identified as Aeromonas caviae.
Growth behaviour of the bacterial strain under TBTC and lead stress
A. caviae strain KS -1 showed tolerance to lead nitrate and TBTC upto 1.4 and 1.0 mM with their MIC values 1.6 and 1.2 mM, respectively (Figs. 1 and 2). Cross-tolerance to other heavy metals was also noticed as MIC values were 1.2 mM, 30 μM, 0.4 mM and 0.9 mM for ZnSO4, HgCl2, CdSO4 and CuSO4, respectively.
Antibiotic susceptibility of the bacterial strain
Besides heavy metal resistance A. caviae strain KS-1 clearly exhibited resistance to various common antibiotics, viz. amikacin (10 μg/ml), ciprofloxacin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (30 μg/ml), streptomycin (10 μg/ml), cephalothin (15 μg/ml), sulphatriad (200 μg/ml) and colistin methane sulphonate (25 μg/ml).
Morphological characterization of the bacterial strain
Alteration in cell morphology as increase in cell size along with a unique morphological pattern in the form of long inter-connected chains of cells was observed in the presence of 1.0 mM TBTC which was clearly revealed by SEM whereas no significant change in cell morphology was noticed when cells were grown in MSM with 1.4 mM lead nitrate (Fig. 3). SEM-EDX analysis of cells exposed to 1.4 mM lead nitrate interestingly revealed 8 % surface biosorption of lead as compared to other major and minor elements present on the cell surface (Fig. 4).
SDS-PAGE analysis of whole-cell proteins of the bacterial strain under lead stress
SDS-PAGE analysis of whole-cell proteins of A. caviae strain KS -1 in the presence of 1.4 mM lead nitrate clearly revealed lead-induced specific induction and upregulation of 15.7, 16.9 and 32.4 kDa proteins and repression and downregulation of a single 18.6 kDa protein (Fig. 5).
Discussion
Heavy metals and organometals, viz. lead, cadmium, mercury, tributyltin, triphenyltin and tetraethyl lead exert their toxic effects on microorganisms through various mechanisms. Even at micromolar levels, they inhibit growth of majority of bacteria whereas few natural microorganisms resist high levels of these toxicants. These resistant microorganisms have acquired a variety of mechanisms to overcome the stress of heavy metals and organometals which include ATP- mediated efflux, precipitation, intracellular sequestration, surface metal biosorption and alteration in cell morphology (Gadd 1990; Nies and Silver 1995; Levinson and Mahler 1998; Roane 1999; Nies 1999; Dubey and Roy 2003; Dubey et al. 2006; Cruz et al. 2007; Taghavi et al. 2009; Maldonado et al. 2010; Naik and Dubey 2011, 2012). Change in cell morphology of the organism has been explained as one of the protective mechanisms for the bacterial cell exposed to a stressful environment (Nepple et al. 1999; Shi and Xia 2003; Neumann et al. 2005; Chakravarty and Banerjee 2008; Naik and Dubey 2011). Bacterial exopolysaccharides play important role in sequestration of heavy metals and thus protect bacterial strains from their toxic effects (Pal and Paul 2008) and thus these bacterial strains can be employed to bioremediate heavy metal-contaminated sites.
In the presence of 1.4 mM lead nitrate, A. caviae strain KS-1 did not show any significant alteration in cell morphology, but exhibited a unique morphological pattern in the form of long inter-connected chains of cells which was clearly revealed by SEM, when exposed to 1 mM TBTC. Under TBTC stress, the cells have divided but did not separate as daughter cells resulting in the formation of enlarged, elongated chains of cells resulting in reduction of total surface area of cells with respect to its volume. This relative reduction of the cell surface to volume ratio serves as an effective mechanism for the cells to overcome the toxic effects of TBTC by reducing the exposed cell surface in relation to the cell volume. This is the first report on alteration in bacterial cell morphology in response to TBTC stress and serves as a novel resistance mechanism. Under the stress of lead nitrate, A. caviae strain KS-1, instead of changing its cell morphology, biosorbed 8 % of lead on the cell surface as evident from SEM-EDX analysis. This significant surface biosorption of lead may be due to entrapment of lead in bacterial exopolysaccharide which prevents entry of toxic lead inside cell and thus protects bacterial cell from its detrimental effects. Interestingly, it also showed induction/upregulation of three lead- induced proteins with molecular mass 15.7, 16.9 and 32.4 kDa, respectively, which clearly demonstrated their possible role in lead resistance.
We conclude that A. caviae strain KS-1 under the stress of TBTC protects itself by forming long chain of cells which reduces the surface to volume ratio and results in reducing the exposed cell surface for TBTC. But when cells are exposed to lead, it is adsorbed significantly (i.e. 8 % lead) on the cell surface itself and no significant alteration in cell morphology was observed which clearly indicates that A. caviae strain KS-1 has sequestered lead outside the cell and thus responds differently for two different stress conditions. Therefore, this lead- and TBTC-resistant A. caviae strain KS-1 may serve as a potential candidate for lead bioremediation in lead-contaminated environmental sites and also as a specific natural biosensor for TBTC biomonitoring since it showed significant alteration in cell morphology as long chains of cells when exposed to TBTC.
References
Asmub, M., Mullenders, L. H. F., & Hartwing, A. (2000). Interference by toxic metal compounds with isolated zinc finger DNA repair proteins. Toxicology Letters, 112–113, 227–231.
Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C., & Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 45, 493–496.
Cameron, R. E. (1992). Guide to site and soil description of hazardous waste site characterization, vol. I: Metals. Environmental Protection Agency report 600/4- 91/029.
Canovas, D., Cases, I., & de Lorenzo, V. (2003). Heavy metal tolerance and metal homeostasis in Pseudomonas putida as revealed by complete genome analysis. Environmental Microbiology, 5, 1242–1256.
Cerebasi, I. H., & Yetis, U. (2001). Biosorption of Ni (II) and Pb (II) by Phanerochaete chrysosporium from a binary metal system-kinetics. Water Research, 24, 15–20.
Chakravarty, R., & Banerjee, P. C. (2008). Morphological changes in an acidophilic bacterium induced by heavy matals. Extremophiles, 12, 279–284.
Cruz, A., Caetano, T., Suzuki, S., & Mendo, S. (2007). Aeromonas veronii, a tributyltin (TBT) degrading bacterium isolated from an estuarine environment, Ria de Aveiro in Portugal. Marine Environmental Research, 64, 639–650.
Dubey, S. K., & Roy, U. (2003). Biodegradation of tributyltins (organotins) by marine bacteria. Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 17, 3–8.
Dubey, S. K., Tokashiki, T., & Suzuki, S. (2006). Microarray-mediated transcriptome analysis of the tributyltin (TBT)-resistant bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa 25 W in the presence of TBT. The Journal of Microbiology, 44, 200–205.
Gadd, G. M. (1990). Heavy metal accumulation by bacteria and other microorganisms. Experientia, 46, 834–840.
Gadd, G. M., & White, C. (1993). Microbial treatment of metal pollution—a working biotechnology? Trends in Biotechnology, 11, 353–359.
Hartwing, A., Asmuss, M., Ehleben, I., Herzer, U., Kostelac, D., Pelzer, A., Schwerdtle, T., & Burkle, A. (2002). Interference by toxic metal ions with DNA repair processes and cell cycle control: molecular mechanisms. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 797–799.
Hernandez, A., Mellado, R. P., & Martinez, J. L. (1998). Metal accumulation and vanadium-induced multidrug resistance by environmental isolate of Escherichia hermannii and Enterobacter cloacae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64, 4317–4320.
Krieg, N. R., & Holt, J. G. (1984). Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology (Vol. I, pp. 545–548). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680–685.
Levinson, H. S., & Mahler, I. (1998). Phosphatase activity and lead resistance in Citrobacter freundii and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 161, 135–138.
Maldonado, J., Diestra, E., Huang, L., Domènech, A. M., Villagrasa, E., Puyen, Z. M., Duran, R., Esteve, I., & Sole, A. (2010). Isolation and identification of a bacterium with high tolerance to lead and copper from a marine microbial mat in Spain. Annals of Microbiology, 60, 113–120.
Martinez, R. J., Beazley, M. J., Taillefert, M., Arakaki, A. K., Skolnick, J., & Sobecky, P. A. (2007). Aerobic uranium (VI) bioprecipitation by metal resistant bacteria isolated from radionuclide and metal contaminated subsurface soils. Environmental Microbiology, 10, 1097–1101.
Naik, M. M., & Dubey, S. K. (2011). Lead -enhanced siderophore production and alteration in cell morphology in a Pb resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 4EA. Current Microbiology, 62, 409–414.
Naik, M. M., & Dubey, S. K. (2012). Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain WI-1 from mandovi estuary possesses metallothionein to alleviate lead toxicity and promotes plant growth. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.12.015.
Nehru, B., & Kaushal, S. (1992). Effect of lead on hepatic microsomal enzyme activity. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 12, 401–405.
Nepple, B. B., Flynn, I., & Bachofen, R. (1999). Morphological changes in phototrophic bacteria induced by metalloid oxyanions. Microbiological Research, 154, 191–198.
Neumann, G., Veerannagauda, Y., Karegoudar, T. B., Sahin, O., Mausezahl, I., Kabelitz, N., Kappelmeyer, U., & Heipieper, H. I. (2005). Cells of Pseudomonas putida and Enterobacter sp. adapt to toxic organic compounds by increasing their size. Extremophiles, 9, 163–168.
Nies, D. H. (1999). Microbial heavy metal resistance. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51, 730–750.
Nies, D. H., & Silver, S. (1995). Ion efflux systems involved in bacterial metal resistances. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 14, 186–199.
Pain, A., & Cooney, J. J. (1998). Characterization of organotin resistant bacteria from Boston harbor sediment. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 35, 412–416.
Pal, A., & Paul, A. K. (2008). Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: central elements in heavy metal bioremediation. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 48, 49–64.
Ramachandran, V., & Dubey, S. K. (2009). Expression of TBTCl-induced periplasmic proteins in a tributyltin chloride resistant marine sediment bacterium Alcaligenes sp. Current Science, 97, 1717–1718.
Roane, T. M. (1999). Lead resistance in two bacterial isolates from heavy metal- contaminated soils. Microbial Ecology, 37, 218–224.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., & Maniatis, T. (1989). Detection and analysis of protein expressed from cloned genes. In Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual (IIth ed., Vol. III, pp. 1847–1858). USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Sharma, S., Sundaram, C. S., Luthra, P. M., Singh, Y., Sirdeshmukh, R., & Gade, W. N. (2006). Role of proteins in resistance mechanism of Pseudomonas fluorescens against heavy metal induced stress with proteomics approach. Journal of Biotechnology, 126, 374–382.
Shi, B. H., & Xia, X. H. (2003). Morphological changes of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes in response to temperature selection. Current Microbiology, 46, 120–123.
Taghavi, S., Lesaulnier, C., Monchy, S., Wattiez, R., Mergeay, M., & van der Lelie, D. (2009). Lead (II) resistance in Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34: interplay between plasmid and chromosomally-located functions. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 96, 171–182.
Zobell, C. E. (1941). Studies on marine bacteria. I. The cultural requirements of heterotrophic aerobes. Journal of Marine Research, 4, 42–75.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Dubey is thankful to Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for financial support as a major R&D grant. We gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. M. J. Beg, Dr. R. Mohan and Ms. Sahina Gazi from National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Research, Vasco da Gama, Goa, India for kindly providing SEM-EDX facility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shamim, K., Naik, M.M., Pandey, A. et al. Isolation and identification of Aeromonas caviae strain KS-1 as TBTC- and lead-resistant estuarine bacteria. Environ Monit Assess 185, 5243–5249 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2940-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2940-2