Abstract
By using provincial socioeconomic and environmental data, this paper examines the relationship between human capital, FDI and pollution emissions in China. The result shows the impact of FDI on pollution emission is highly dependent on the level of human capital. FDI is negatively associated with pollution emissions in provinces with the higher levels of human capital, whereas FDI is positively related to pollution emissions in provinces with the lower levels of human capital. This suggests that pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) holds only in those provinces with low human capital. This study also finds that the sign of FDI’s effect on each pollutant’ emission requires the different threshold level of human capital, which may help to reconcile the current conflicting PHH empirical evidences partially.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Afsah S, Laplante B, Wheeler D (1996) Controlling industrial pollution: a new paradigm. Working paper no. 1672. Policy Research Department, World Bank, Washington, DC
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for environment?. Am Econ Rev 91(4): 877–908
Baek J, Koo WW (2009) A dynamic approach to the FDI-environment nexus: the case of China and India. J Int Econ Stud 13(2): 87–108
Barro RJ, Lee J-W (1993) International comparisons of educational attainment. J Monet Econ 32(3): 363–394
Barro RJ, Lee J-W (2001) International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Oxf Econ Pap 53(3): 541–563
Birdsall N, Wheeler D (1993) Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens. J Environ Dev 2(1): 137–149
Bommer R (1999) Environmental policy and industrial competitiveness: the pollution-haven hypothesis reconsidered. Rev Int Econ 7(2): 342–355
Caselli F, Coleman WJ (2001) Cross-country technology diffusion: the case of computers. Am Econ Rev 91(2): 328–335
Cohen D, Soto M (2007) Growth and human capital: good data, good results. J Econ Growth 12(1): 51–76
Cole MA (2000) Air pollution and ‘dirty’ industries: how and why does the composition of manufacturing output change with economic development?. Environ Resour Econ 17(1): 109–123
Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2003) US specialization in pollution-intensive industries: factor intensities versus environmental regulations. The School of Economics discussion paper series, no. 0321. The University of Manchester
Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2006) Globalization, firm-level characteristics and environmental management: a study of Japan. Ecol Econ 59(3): 312–323
Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Wu S (2008) Industrial activity and the environment in China: an industry-level analysis. China Econ Rev 19(3): 393–408
Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Zhang J (2011) Growth, foreign direct investment and the environment: evidence from Chinese cities. J Reg Sci 51(1): 121–138
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit 42(1): 7–71
Costantini V, Monni S (2008) Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecol Econ 64(4): 867–880
Dasgupta S, Huq M, Wheeler D (1997) Bending the rules: discretionary pollution control in China. Policy research working paper, no.1761. Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC
Dean JM, Lovely ME, Wang H (2009) Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. J Dev Econ 90(1): 1–13
Di W (2007) Pollution abatement cost savings and FDI inflows to polluting sectors in China. Environ Dev Econ 12(6): 775–798
Eaton J, Kortum S (1997) Engines of growth: domestic and foreign sources of innovation. Jpn World Econ 9(2): 235–259
Ederington J (2007) NAFTA and the pollution haven hypothesis. Policy Stud J 35(2): 239–244
Eskeland GS, Harrison AE (2003) Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J Dev Econ 70(1): 1–23
Fu X (2008) Foreign direct investment, absorptive capacity and regional innovation capabilities: evidence from China. Oxford Dev Stud 36(1): 89–110
Gray WB, Deily ME (1996) Compliance and enforcement: air pollution regulation in the U.S. steel industry. J Environ Econ Manag 31(1): 96–111
Hartman RS, Huq M, Wheeler D (1997) Why paper mills clean up: determinants of pollution abatement in four Asian countries. Policy Research Department working paper, no.1710, World Bank, Washington, DC
He J (2006) Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecol Econ 60(1): 228–245
Hettige H, Huq M, Pargal S, Wheeler D (1996) Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: evidence from South and Southeast Asia. World Dev 24(12): 1891–1904
Huq M, Wheeler D (1993) Pollution reduction without formal regulation: evidence from Bangladesh. Environment Department working paper 1993-39. World Bank, Washington, DC
Jaffe AB, Peterson SR, Portney PR, Stavins RN (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us. J Econ Lit 33(1): 132–163
Kellenberg DK (2009) An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. J Int Econ 78(2): 242–255
Krueger AB, Lindahl M (2001) Education for growth: why and for whom. J Econ Lit 39(4): 1101–1136
Lamla MJ (2009) Long-run determinants of pollution: a robustness analysis. Ecol Econ 69(1): 135–144
Letchumanan R, Kodama F (2000) Reconciling the conflict between the ‘pollution-haven’ hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer. Res Policy 29(1): 59–79
List JA, Co CY (2000) The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. J Environ Econ Manag 40(1): 1–20
Pargal S, Wheeler D (1996) Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. J Polit Econ 104(6): 1314–1327
Porter ME, Van Der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive : ending the stalemate green and competitive. Harv Bus Rev 73(5): 120–134
Romer PM (1991) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5): 71–102
Sha B, Shi T (2006) The environmental effect of FDI: an analysis based on provincial panel dataset in China. World Econ Study 25(6): 18–25 (in Chinese)
UNCTAD (2010) FDI Statistics. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/TableViewer/tableView.aspx. Accessed 7th May 2010
Verhoef ET, Nijkamp P (2002) Externalities in urban sustainability: environmental versus localization-type agglomeration externalities in a general spatial equilibrium model of a single-sector mono-centric industrial city. Ecol Econ 40(2): 157–179
Waldkirch A, Gopinath M (2008) Pollution control and foreign direct investment in Mexico: an industry-level analysis. Environ Resour Econ 41(3): 289–313
Wang H, Jin Y (2007) Industrial ownership and environmental performance: evidence from China. Environ Resour Econ 36(3): 255–273
Wang Y, Yao Y (2003) Sources of China’s economic growth 1952–1999: incorporating human capital accumulation. China Econ Rev 14(1): 32–52
Xing Y, Kolstad CD (2002) Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment?. Environ Resour Econ 21(1): 1–22
Xu B (2000) Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. J Dev Econ 62(2): 477–493
Yao S (2006) On economic growth, FDI and exports in China. Appl Econ 38(3): 339–351
Zeng D-Z, Zhao L (2009) Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. J Environ Econ Manag 58(2): 141–153
Zhang J, Fu X (2008) FDI and environmental regulations in China. J Asia Pac Econ 13(3): 332–353
Zheng S, Kahn ME, Liu H (2010) Towards a system of open cities in China: home prices, FDI flows and air quality in 35 major cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40(1): 1–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lan, J., Kakinaka, M. & Huang, X. Foreign Direct Investment, Human Capital and Environmental Pollution in China. Environ Resource Econ 51, 255–275 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9498-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9498-2