Abstract
Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows into developing countries have been increasing dramatically over the past decade. At the same time, there has been widespread concern that lax environmental standards are in part responsible for this surge. This paper revisits the question of the existence of a pollution haven effect by examining the extent to which the pollution intensity of production helps explain FDI in Mexico. We focus on pollution intensities, which are directly related to emission regulations, rather than unobservable pollution taxes and allow for substitution between capital and pollution. Examining several different pollutants, we find a positive correlation between FDI and pollution that is statistically and economically significant in the case of the highly regulated sulfur dioxide emissions. Industries for which the estimated relationship between FDI and pollution is positive receive up to 30% of total FDI and 30% of manufacturing output. Although we confirm the importance of Mexico’s comparative advantage in labor-intensive production processes, consistent with the previous literature, our results suggest that environmental considerations may matter as well for firms’ investment decisions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment?. Am Econ Rev 91: 877–908
Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press
Blonigen BA, Davies RB, Head K (2003) Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise: comment. Am Econ Rev 93: 980–994
Brainard SL (1997) An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. Am Econ Rev 87: 520–544
Carr DL, Markusen JR, Maskus KE (2001) Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. Am Econ Rev 91: 693–708
Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2003) Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor, and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manag 46: 363–383
Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2005) FDI and the capital intensity of ‘dirty’ sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Rev Dev Econ 9: 530–548
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2003) Trade and the environment. Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cropper ML, Oates WE (1992) Environmental economics: a survey. J Econ Lit 30: 675–740
Dasgupta S, Hettige S, Wheeler D (2000) What improves environmental compliance? Evidence from Mexican industry. J Environ Econ Manag 39: 39–66
Dean JM, Lovely ME, Wang H (2005) Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3505
Ederington J, Minier J (2003) Is environmental policy a secondary trade barrier? An empirical analysis. Can J Econ 36: 137–154
Ederington J, Levinson A, Minier J (2005) Footloose and pollution-free. Rev Econ Stat 87: 92–99
Eskeland GS, Harrison AE (2003) Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J Dev Econ 70: 1–23
Feenstra RC, Hanson GH (1997) Foreign direct investment and relative wages: evidence from Mexico’s maquiladoras. J Int Econ 42: 371–393
Franko PM (1999) The puzzle of Latin American economic development. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Fredriksson PG, List JA, Millimet DL (2003) Bureaucratic corruption, environmental policy and inbound US FDI: theory and evidence. J Public Econ 87: 1407–1430
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In: Garber PM (eds) The Mexico-US free trade agreement. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Hettige H, Huq M, Pargal S, Wheeler D (1996) Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries: evidence from South and South-East Asia. World Dev 24: 1891–1904
Jaffe AB, Peterson SR, Portney PR, Stavins RN (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?. J Econ Lit 33: 132–163
Kalt JP (1998) The impact of domestic environmental regulatory policies on U.S. international competitiveness. In: Spence AM, Hazard H (eds) International competitiveness. Harper and Row, Massachusetts
Keller W, Levinson A (2002) Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to U.S. states. Rev Econ Stat 84: 691–703
Kunce M, Shogren JF (2002) On environmental federalism and direct emission control. J Urban Econ 51: 238–245
Levinson A, Taylor SM (2004) Unmasking the pollution haven effect. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10629
List JA, Millimet DL, Fredriksson PG, McHone WW (2003) Effects of environmental regulations on manufacturing plant births: evidence from a propensity score matching estimator. Rev Econ Stat 85: 944–952
Lucas REB, Wheeler D, Hettige H (1992) Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution. In: Low P (ed) International trade and the environment. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 159:1960–1988
Mani M, Wheeler D (1998) In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960–1995. J Environ Dev 7: 215–247
Markusen JR (1997) Trade versus investment liberalization. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6231
Markusen JR (2002) Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Markusen JR, Maskus KE (2002) Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. Rev Int Econ 10: 694–707
Moulton BR (1986) Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates. J Econometrics 32: 385–389
OECD (2002) Environmental data compendium. OECD, Paris
Smarzynska BK, Wei S-J (2004) Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secret or popular myth? Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy: Vol. 3: No. 2, Article 8. http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol3/iss2/art8
Weitzman M (1974) Prices vs. qauntities. Rev Econ Stud 41: 477–491
Wheeler D (2001) Racing to the bottom? Foreign investment and air quality in developing countries. J Environ Dev 10: 225–245
Wheeler D, Mody A (1992) International investment location decisions. J Int Econ 33: 57–76
Xing Y, Kolstad CD (2002) Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment?. Environ Resour Econ 21: 1–22
Yeaple SR (2003) The role of skill endowments in the structure of U.S. outward foreign direct investment. Rev Econ Stat 85: 726–734
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waldkirch, A., Gopinath, M. Pollution Control and Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico: An Industry-Level Analysis. Environ Resource Econ 41, 289–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9192-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9192-1