Abstract
A crucial step for tumor cell extravasation and metastasis is the migration through the extracellular matrix, which requires proteolytic activity. Hence, proteases, particularly matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), have been discussed as therapeutic targets and their inhibition should diminish tumor growth and metastasis. The metalloproteases meprin α and meprin β are highly abundant on intestinal enterocytes and their expression was associated with different stages of colorectal cancer. Due to their ability to cleave extracellular matrix (ECM) components, they were suggested as pro-tumorigenic enzymes. Additionally, both meprins were shown to have pro-inflammatory activity by cleaving cytokines and their receptors, which correlates with chronic intestinal inflammation and associated conditions. On the other hand, meprin β was identified as an essential enzyme for the detachment and renewal of the intestinal mucus, important to prevent bacterial overgrowth and infection. Considering this, it is hard to estimate whether high activity of meprins is generally detrimental or if these enzymes have also protective functions in certain cancer types. For instance, for colorectal cancer, patients with high meprin β expression in tumor tissue exhibit a better survival prognosis, which is completely different to prostate cancer. This demonstrates that the very same enzyme may have contrary effects on tumor initiation and growth, depending on its tissue and subcellular localization. Hence, precise knowledge about proteolytic enzymes is required to design the most efficient therapeutic options for cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the current findings on meprins’ functions, expression, and cancer-associated variants with possible implications for tumor progression and metastasis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Tissue remodeling and metastasis are crucial mechanisms for tumor spreading/or progression. Proteases that can remodel extracellular matrix (ECM) and build up a tumor-beneficial microenvironment are therefore potent tools for cancer cells to adjust the ECM. Furthermore, disruption of ECM and cleavage of adhesion molecules can promote invasion and metastasis of cancer cells.
Meprin α and meprin β are zinc-dependent metalloproteases that exhibit unique molecular and functional properties among all extracellular proteases. The major expression sites of meprins are enterocytes in the small intestine and colon, the brush border membrane of proximal tubuli in the kidney, and to minor extend the epidermis, blood vessels, lung, brain, and certain immune cells [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Meprin α and meprin β are two individual enzymes encoded by genes on different chromosomes and thus distinct promoter usage [4, 8, 9]. However, they share 41% sequence identity and have a similar domain structure with the exception of a so-called inserted domain in meprin α, which is located between the EGF- and TRAF-domain. Meprin α is maturated by furin cleavage on the secretory pathway, thereby losing its C-terminus and transmembrane anchor, which makes meprin α a secreted protease [10, 11]. In the endoplasmic reticulum, two meprin monomers build a dimer via a disulfide bridge between the MAM-domains, which further associate to non-covalently linked oligomers in the extracellular space [10]. Interestingly, when co-expressed in the same cell, meprin α and meprin β can form heterodimeric enzyme complexes that tether soluble meprin α to the cell membrane, which probably modifies its function and substrate spectrum [11,12,13]. Of note, meprin knock-out mice are viable and show no severe phenotype, indicating that meprins are either not essential proteases for murine development or that meprin activity can be compensated by other enzymes [14, 15]. However, meprin α– and meprin β–deficient mice exhibit diminished ECM deposition in the skin, which points toward their function in collagen maturation [16, 17]. Interestingly, expression of meprins is also found in a variety of tumors and cancer cells that might benefit from their activity as extracellular proteases with a broad substrate spectrum, which includes degradation and modulation of ECM proteins, maturation of cytokines and growth factors, and cleavage of adhesion molecules.
In this review, we focus on expression and regulation of meprins in tumors and cancer cells, as well as on their role on substrate cleavage with regard to ECM remodeling, angiogenesis, cancer cell invasion, and metastasis.
1 Expression of meprin metalloproteases in tumor and cancer cells
Meprin α and meprin β are two related proteases of the astacin protease family. Although sharing 41% amino acid sequence identity, the proteases are encoded on different chromosomes and expressed individually by different promoter and transcription factors. Concomitant, expression and function of meprins varies in tumors and cancer cells. In recent years, increased expression and activity of meprin α was reported in various tumors (Table 1).
The earliest identification of meprin α in a neoplasm was in colorectal cancer and the colon carcinoma cell line Caco-2 [18]. In cell culture experiments as well as in tumor tissue sections, basolateral sorting and accumulation of meprin α in the stroma was observed, which was in contrast to the physiological apical sorting of meprins, e.g., in enterocytes (Fig. 1). Later on, expression of meprin α on the mRNA- and protein level was further characterized in different tumor stages: colonic adenomas, primary tumor stages I–IV, and in liver metastasis [25]. Increased protein levels were detected in transition from benign adenomas to malignant primary tumors. Interestingly, meprin α mRNA expression in the intestine was found to be tightly restricted to a certain pool of enterocytes that were defined as rather early differentiated cells [26]. Here, meprin α was even suggested as a marker gene for this particular cell population. Thus, dysregulation of meprin α expression or activity likely influences intestinal epithelial proliferation and differentiation, which may be linked to colon cancer [18]. A pro-migratory effect for colon cancer cells was seen in cells expressing both meprin α and meprin β, leading to membrane-bound meprin α forming heterodimers with meprin β (Fig. 1) [11,12,13]. Although MEP1B mRNA was not detectable in colorectal cancer at that time, the authors speculated that meprin β could be expressed in a subpopulation of cancer cells that migrate away from the tumor mass by cleaving adhesion molecules.
Recently, another possibility to tether meprin α to the membrane was described. Biasin et al. demonstrated that meprin α can bind to heparan sulfate of lung vascular epithelial cells, which leads to disrupted barrier integrity in vitro [27]. Thus, equal membrane-tethering could take place in cancer cells expressing heparan sulfate [28]. Nevertheless, membrane-bound substrates being exclusively cleaved by membrane-tethered meprin α are unknown so far.
Interestingly, high meprin α protein levels but no meprin α activity were observed in liver metastasis of colorectal cancer patients, indicating a lack of meprin α activators that are not expressed by the cancer cells itself but by tumor stromal cells [25, 29]. In contrast, OuYang et al. identified meprin α expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and suggested the protease as a prognostic predictor and risk factor with poor survival of patients [20]. Further in vitro characterization highlighted a role of meprin α in proliferation, migration, and invasion of cancer cells via activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases/zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ERK/ZEB1) pathway that has also been described for colorectal cancer progression [20, 30]. Meprin α–mediated invasiveness has also been observed earlier in the meprin α–expressing human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-435, where invasiveness decreased when cells were treated with the meprin α inhibitor actinonin [31]. Moreover, meprin α as well as MMP7 expression could be decreased in the breast cancer cell line by treating the cells with a-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), which increases ERK phosphorylation. Further experiments showed restored meprin α expression with a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor [31, 32]. This finding seems to be contrary to the observation of OuYang et al., but could indicate a feedback-loop between the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and meprin α. Increased meprin α mRNA expression was identified to be regulated by the oncogene Reptin in HCC [21, 33]. Here, the authors did not observe a pro-proliferative effect of meprin α, but both silencing meprin α itself or via silencing of Reptin reduced migration and invasion of HuH7 and Hep3B in accordance with OuYang et al.. Meprin α was also suggested as a prognostic marker for differentiation of pancreatic cancer (PCA) from chronic pancreatitis [22]. Here, meprin α expression was also found at the basolateral cell membrane of PCA cells and linked to neovascularization.
Expression of meprin β has also been described in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and respective liver metastasis; however, a functional consequence has not been addressed so far [23]. Nevertheless, some studies suggested a potential role for meprin β particularly in migration and invasion of cancer cells. In accordance with mislocalized basolateral expression of meprin α in colon carcinoma, basolateral expression of meprin β was recently observed in endometrial cancer [24]. The authors tested a genetic variant of meprin β G32R, which was annotated in the BioMuta database [34] (https://hive.biochemistry.gwu.edu/biomuta/proteinview) of large-scale screenings from endometrial cancer samples. In vitro characterization of this variant showed accelerated meprin β activation and increased invasion of transfected HeLa cells through a collagen IV matrix [24]. In accordance with this, meprin β is capable of cleaving various adhesion molecules that would normally anchor adjacent cells to surrounding tissues (Fig. 1). One of those adhesion molecules and a substrate of meprin β is CD99, a type I transmembrane protein expressed in cells of the hematopoietic system and at intercellular borders of endothelial cells [35,36,37,38,39]. Homophilic CD99 interaction plays an essential role for transendothelial migration (TEM) of immune cells, and CD99 expression is also a hallmark of Ewing’s sarcoma [39,40,41,42]. Cleavage of CD99 by meprin β was investigated with regard to TEM both (i) in vitro by transmigrating Lewis lung carcinoma cells through an endothelial bEnd.3 cell monolayer in the presence of recombinant meprin β and (ii) in vivo in an acute inflammation mouse model [36, 37]. Besides the physiological function on migrating immune cells, cleavage of CD99 by meprin β could also presume a tumor invasion- and metastasis-beneficial event. In polarized Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells and Caco-2 cells, the epithelial adhesion protein E-cadherin has been described as a substrate of meprin β [43]. As an important intercellular junction protein, E-cadherin was considered a tumor suppressor, since downregulation promoted progression of adenoma to invasive carcinoma [44, 45]. Dysregulated basolateral sorting of meprin β in tumor tissue could therefore lead to cleavage of E-cadherin and subsequent detachment of cancer cells and β-catenin-induced proliferation. In contrast with MEP1A expression, a cancer-specific transcription variant of meprin β, namely meprin β′, was identified in both human and murine cancer cells. Of note, meprin β′ expression was stimulated using retinoic acid or phorbol myristal acetate (PMA) [46,47,48]. In both species, the 5′ UTR of meprin β′ mRNA differs from normal meprin β mRNA with the exception that murine meprin β′ is also alternatively spliced, resulting in a different signal peptide (bold) and propeptide sequence (italic) (murine meprin β: MDARHQPWFLVFATFLLVSGLPAPEKFVKDID…; murine meprin β′: MNSTAGPASRSRHSFKCRMKLLKAPRDGMYMMTFGVKDID…). However, a physiological consequence of human and murine meprin β′ with regard to altered mRNA or protein stability, intracellular transport, or activation has not been investigated yet. Of note, signal peptide prediction of the murine meprin β′ sequence revealed only a weak signal peptide consensus sequence, indicating also potential differences in intracellular sorting compared with normal murine meprin β.
Besides this major cancer-related alteration within the sequence of meprin β, different single nucleotide variants (SNVs) for MEP1A and MEP1B that were observed in different tumors are listed in the BioMuta database [34]. For MEP1B, most SNVs were found in melanoma, uterine cancer, lung cancer, and liver cancer, resulting in several amino acid residue changes within the protein sequence (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, some SNVs can be found in the conserved zinc-binding motif (HExxHxxGxxHxxxRxDR) in the catalytic domain that might disrupt the proteases’ catalytic activity (Fig. 2b, underlined). A mutation of R238 to glutamine was found in melanoma, malignant glioma, and uterine cancer and would alter the substrate specificity of meprin β and the preference for negatively charged amino acids at the P1′ position [49]. So far, no SNVs were listed that affect the trypsin-activation site (R61), the meprin β dimerization (C305) or the ADAM10/17 cleavage motif (Q(595)IQL) upstream of the EGF-like domain (Fig. 2b). Most tumor-associated SNVs for MEP1A are also found in melanoma, followed by lung cancer, uterine cancer, and stomach cancer (Fig. 2c). Again, the conserved zinc-binding motif can be disrupted by several amino acid residue exchanges (Fig. 2d, underlined). Furthermore, two SNVs were found in liver and pancreatic cancer that prevented homo-dimerization of meprin α or formation of a meprin α/β enzyme complex, which tethers meprin α to the cell surface. The mutation A727S in the transmembrane region of meprin α could be detected with high frequency in lung cancer and might cause folding problems or aberrant helix interactions resulting in a loss of function. If and how these mutations affect cellular localization, proteolytic activity, or posttranslational modification and thus may promote tumor growth or metastasis need to be elucidated. Recently, Schäffler et al. investigated a meprin β G32R variant, which was found in endometrial cancer and showed accelerated activation of the protease and pro-invasive properties for HeLa cells [24]. However, to investigate if the SNVs observed for meprin α and meprin β are driver or bystander mutations, suitable animal/xenograft models are needed.
2 Posttranslational regulation of meprin metalloproteases
Meprins are expressed as zymogens with an N-terminal propeptide blocking the active site cleft of the catalytic domain. Thus, meprins require activation by other proteases in order to gain catalytic activity by loss of the inhibitory propeptide. Therefore, expression of meprin-activating enzymes in tumor tissue and cancer cells is a substantial aspect when investigating meprin functions. Due to the activation site of meprins, containing arginine or lysine residues in the P1 position, tryptic serine proteases have been described to activate meprin metalloproteases both in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 1). In 1993, pancreatic trypsin was identified as the first meprin-activating enzyme, cleaving at Arg65 (meprin α) or Arg61 (meprin β), and was therefore discussed as the most relevant activation mechanism of meprins in the intestinal lumen [50]. Interestingly, expression of trypsin is also found in a variety of cancer cells from ovary, prostate, lung, and colon [51,52,53,54]. Especially in colorectal carcinogenesis, high trypsin expression is linked to poor prognosis of patients [54]. As a secreted enzyme, trypsin can either directly cleave components of the ECM or activate other ECM degrading enzymes like MMPs. However, targeting trypsin as a therapeutic approach is not suitable due to its contribution as a digestive enzyme and also as an activator of other enzymes within the intestinal tract. Although described as the most potent activator of meprins in the intestine, trypsin is most likely not directly getting access to membrane-bound meprins on enterocytes due to the mucus barrier that shields the epithelial layer [55]. This has probably a good reason since active membrane-tethered meprin β was shown to decrease cell adhesion [43], which would be detrimental for the intestinal epithelium. Recently, the secreted bacterial protease RgpB from Porphyromonas gingivalis was shown to potently activate meprin β at the cell surface [56]. P. gingivalis is the major pathogen for periodontitis, but was also shown to be associated with colorectal cancer tissue [57, 58]. The physiological role of meprin β in the intestine is mucus detachment by cleaving its major component mucin 2 [59]. The constant renewal of the mucus layer prevents bacterial overgrowth and infection [55]. Importantly, only soluble shed meprin β can get access to the cleavage site in mucin 2 [59]. Hence, activation of meprin β at the plasma membrane of enterocytes, e.g., by RgpB, would prevent its shedding by ADAM proteases, consequently resulting in mucus accumulation, which may serve as source of infection for invasive bacteria. In turn, chronic intestinal inflammation could be the basis for tumor development. Other serine proteases and meprin-activating enzymes are human tissue-kallikreins (KLKs) [60]. Physiological meprin-activation by KLKs likely occurs in differentiating keratinocytes in the epidermis. Since KLKs are also expressed in certain cancers, e.g., colorectal cancer, co-expression with meprins would lead to their activation [61, 62]. Of note, some serine proteases can only activate meprin α or meprin β while others can activate both (Fig. 1). It has been shown that KLK5 can cleave the propeptide of both meprin α and meprin β, while KLK4 and KLK8 can only activate meprin β [60]. Similarly, membrane-bound serine protease matriptase-2 was shown to activate meprin β on the cell surface but does not reach the secreted meprin α [63]. In contrast, the secreted protease plasmin activates only meprin α [29, 64]. This can take place in tumor stroma of colorectal cancer, where meprin α was secreted to the basolateral site [18]. In coculture experiments with Caco-2 cells and intestinal fibroblasts, plasminogen activators produced by fibroblasts were able to activate meprin α [29]. Hence, meprin α could degrade ECM and basement membrane proteins like fibronectin, nidogen, or laminins in tumor stroma and promote tumor-beneficial tissue remodeling [35, 65, 66].
Lottaz et al. identified meprin α expression in liver metastases from colorectal cancer [25]. Interestingly, meprin α purified from isolated metastasis showed no proteolytic activity compared with the primary tumor, indicating that (i) meprin α activity might not be required for metastasis and formation of the metastatic niches and that (ii) meprin α activators are probably secreted by surrounding cells and tissues as observed in the coculture experiment with Caco-2 cells and intestinal fibroblasts [25, 29]. This is in accordance with the observation that the urokinase-type plasmin activator-system was not active in liver metastasis due to overexpression of respective inhibitors [67].
Unlike meprin α, which is secreted due to proteolytic processing by furin in the secretory pathway, meprin β is transported and tethered to the cell surface. However, meprin β can be shed by ADAMs 10 and 17 from the plasma membrane into the extracellular space, thereby reaching a different subset of substrates [56, 68]. Of note, it has been shown that only inactive pro-meprin β is shed by ADAMs for an unknown reason [56]. Therefore, soluble meprin β like meprin α requires further activation by other enzymes in the extracellular space. Interestingly, some membrane-bound meprin β substrates like the interleukin 6 receptor (IL-6R) or the amyloid precursor protein (APP) cannot be cleaved by soluble meprin β, indicating a tight regulatory mechanism by other proteases that can impair substrate accessibility on the cell surface or intracellular interactions [69]. On the other hand, the membrane-bound adhesion molecule CD99 was shown to be cleaved by both soluble and membrane-bound meprin β [36, 37].
Collectively, functionality of meprin metalloproteases is regulated not only by transcription but also by a variety of posttranslational events that alter localization, activation, and substrate availability, which have to be considered for investigation of these proteases’ roles, e.g., on cancer cells and tumorigenesis.
3 Meprins promote inflammation, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis
Tumor development and progression is often accompanied by inflammation within the tumor microenvironment and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by immune cells. Meprin expression was observed in various inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), vasculitis, and renal and urogenital injury [14, 70,71,72]. Since meprins can cleave adhesion molecules like CD99 and E-cadherin and affect remodeling of the ECM, they have a pro-migratory function not only for metastatic cancer cells but also for inflammatory cells, which was recently shown in meprin β knock-out mice employing a model of acute inflammation (air pouch/carrageenan) [37]. Additionally, expression of meprin β is associated with the production of several pro-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin (IL-)1β, IL-18, and IL-6 in macrophages (Fig. 1) [73]. For activation of IL-1β and IL-18, propeptides of these cytokines need to be cleaved off proteolytically, which can be carried out by caspases inside the cell [74,75,76]. However, both meprin α and meprin β were also shown to activate pro-IL1β and pro-IL18 in vitro and in vivo [77,78,79,80]. Although controversially discussed, this might be possible due to the release of the preforms through gasdermin pores, recently shown to be important for active IL-1β secretion via inflammasomes in programmed necrosis [81, 82]. Furthermore, meprin α and membrane-bound meprin β were recently shown to shed the IL-6R from the cell surface, thereby triggering the pro-inflammatory trans-signaling process of IL-6, which was also described for ADAM proteases [69, 83, 84].
In Caco-2 cells, meprin α is capable of activating the EGF receptor/mitogen-activated protein kinase (EGFR/MAPK) signaling pathway by shedding of transforming growth factor α (TGFα) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), thereby enhancing cancer cell proliferation and migration [30]. Moreover, EGFR activation by meprin α was also shown to induce oxidative stress in macrophages, which drives development of atherosclerosis [85]. Elevated EGFR activation is also involved in tumor-associated angiogenesis, a crucial mechanism to provide nutrients to the highly proliferative cancer cells [86]. A well-described angiogenesis-inducing cytokine is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes proliferation of endothelial cells and requires activation by several proteases that are also associated with ECM remodeling [86,87,88]. In vitro experiments revealed a pro-angiogenic role of meprin α, which potentially arises due to VEGF-A cleavage (Fig. 1) [35, 89]. This was further confirmed in knock-down experiments of meprin α in zebrafish [89]. Injection of specific morpholinos in early embryos, targeting Mep1a mRNA, resulted in impaired vessel formation in the developing fish. Hence, meprin α might have multiple pro-tumorigenic functions, either directly influencing tumor cell differentiation and proliferation or the tumor microenvironment by recruiting and inducing vessel growth for oxygen and nutrient supply for the tumor. Furthermore, cleavage of pro-inflammatory cytokines by both meprin α and meprin β can induce a tumor-beneficial inflammation.
4 Conclusion
In this review, we highlight expression, posttranslational regulation, and potential pro-tumorigenic substrate cleavage mechanisms of meprin metalloproteases (Fig. 1). Meprin α and meprin β were detected in several tumors and metastases like colorectal and pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular and renal cell carcinoma, and endometrial cancer. Additionally, meprins are also expressed in a variety of cancer cell lines, further strengthening their impact on tumor growth and cell proliferation. Under physiological conditions, meprin expression is restricted to certain organs, cell types, and apical epithelial sites. However, whenever mislocalized, meprins can switch to harmful enzymes that degrade ECM proteins of the basal lamina, activate pro-inflammatory cytokines, and lead to detachment of cells, which are all cancer-beneficial pathways promoting tumor progression.
Meprin metalloproteases and other proteolytic enzymes are important molecular scissors that modulate tumor development and progression. However, among the almost 200 different human metalloproteases, it is of importance to distinguish between cancer-promoting and cancer-inhibiting functions of these enzymes. This is the basis for the molecular understanding of distinct cancer entities and will help to endeavor therapeutic windows for cancer treatment also using specific protease inhibitors.
References
Beynon, R. J., Shannon, J. D., & Bond, J. S. (1981). Purification and characterization of a metallo-endoproteinase from mouse kidney. The Biochemical Journal, 199(3), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1990591.
Sterchi, E. E., Green, J. R., & Lentze, M. J. (1982). Non-pancreatic hydrolysis of N-benzoyl-l-tyrosyl-p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA-peptide) in the human small intestine. Clinical Science (London, England : 1979), 62(5), 557–560.
Becker-Pauly, C., Höwel, M., Walker, T., Vlad, A., Aufenvenne, K., Oji, V., Lottaz, D., Sterchi, E. E., Debela, M., Magdolen, V., Traupe, H., & Stöcker, W. (2007). The alpha and beta subunits of the metalloprotease meprin are expressed in separate layers of human epidermis, revealing different functions in keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 127(5), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700675.
Sterchi, E. E., Stöcker, W., & Bond, J. S. (2008). Meprins, membrane-bound and secreted astacin metalloproteinases. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 29(5), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.002.
Bond, J. S., Matters, G. L., Banerjee, S., & Dusheck, R. E. (2005). Meprin metalloprotease expression and regulation in kidney, intestine, urinary tract infections and cancer. FEBS Letters, 579(15), 3317–3322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.045.
Scharfenberg, F., Armbrust, F., Marengo, L., Pietrzik, C., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2019). Regulation of the alternative β-secretase meprin β by ADAM-mediated shedding. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS., 76, 3193–3206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03179-1.
Biasin, V., Marsh, L. M., Egemnazarov, B., Wilhelm, J., Ghanim, B., Klepetko, W., Wygrecka, M., Olschewski, H., Eferl, R., Olschewski, A., & Kwapiszewska, G. (2014). Meprin β, a novel mediator of vascular remodelling underlying pulmonary hypertension. Journal of Pathology, 233(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4303.
Gorbea, C. M., Marchand, P., Jiang, W., Copeland, N. G., Gilbert, D. J., Jenkins, N. A., & Bond, J. S. (1993). Cloning, expression, and chromosomal localization of the mouse meprin beta subunit. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268(28), 21035–21043.
Jiang, W., Sadler, P. M., Jenkins, N. A., Gilbert, D. J., Copeland, N. G., & Bond, J. S. (1993). Tissue-specific expression and chromosomal localization of the alpha subunit of mouse meprin A. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268(14), 10380–10385.
Bertenshaw, G. P., Norcum, M. T., & Bond, J. S. (2003). Structure of homo- and hetero-oligomeric meprin metalloproteases: dimers, tetramers, and high molecular mass multimers. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(4), 2522–2532. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M208808200.
Marchand, P., Tang, J., Johnson, G. D., & Bond, J. S. (1995). COOH-terminal proteolytic processing of secreted and membrane forms of the alpha subunit of the metalloprotease meprin a. requirement of the I domain for processing in the endoplasmic reticulum. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270(10), 5449–5456. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.10.5449.
Johnson, G. D., & Hersh, L. B. (1992). Cloning a rat meprin cDNA reveals the enzyme is a heterodimer. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 267(19), 13505–13512.
Peters, F., Scharfenberg, F., Colmorgen, C., Armbrust, F., Wichert, R., Arnold, P., Potempa, B., Potempa, J., Pietrzik, C. U., Häsler, R., Rosenstiel, P., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2019). Tethering soluble meprin α in an enzyme complex to the cell surface affects IBD-associated genes. The FASEB Journal, 33(6), 7490–7504. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802391R.
Banerjee, S., Oneda, B., Yap, L. M., Jewell, D. P., Matters, G. L., Fitzpatrick, L. R., Seibold, F., Sterchi, E. E., Ahmad, T., Lottaz, D., & Bond, J. S. (2009). MEP1A allele for meprin a metalloprotease is a susceptibility gene for inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunology, 2(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2009.3.
Norman, L. P., Jiang, W., Han, X., Thomas, L., Bond, J. S., & Saunders, T. L. (2003). Targeted disruption of the meprin β gene in mice leads to underrepresentation of knockout mice and changes in renal gene expression profiles. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 23(4), 1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.4.1221.
Broder, C., Arnold, P., Vadon-Le Goff, S., Konerding, M. A, Bahr, K., Müller, S., … Becker-Pauly, C. (2013). Metalloproteases meprin α and meprin β are C- and N-procollagen proteinases important for collagen assembly and tensile strength. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(35), 14219–24. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305464110.
Kronenberg, D., Bruns, B. C., Moali, C., Vadon-Le Goff, S., Sterchi, E. E., Traupe, H., … Becker-Pauly, C. (2010). Processing of procollagen III by meprins: new players in extracellular matrix assembly? The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 130(12), 2727–2735. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2010.202.
Lottaz, D., Maurer, C. A., Hahn, D., Büchler, M. W., & Sterchi, E. E. (1999). Nonpolarized secretion of human meprin alpha in colorectal cancer generates an increased proteolytic potential in the stroma. Cancer Research, 59(5), 1127–1133.
Chinello, C., Cazzaniga, M., De Sio, G., Smith, A. J., Gianazza, E., Grasso, A., … Magni, F. (2014). Urinary signatures of renal cell carcinoma investigated by peptidomic approaches. PLoS One, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106684.
Ouyang, H. Y., Xu, J., Luo, J., Zou, R. H., Chen, K., Le, Y., … Shi, M. (2016). MEP1A contributes to tumor progression and predicts poor clinical outcome in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 63(4), 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28397.
Breig, O., Yates, M., Neaud, V., Couchy, G., Grigoletto, A., Lucchesi, C., … Rosenbaum, J. (2017). Metalloproteinase meprin α regulates migration and invasion of human hepatocarcinoma cells and is a mediator of the oncoprotein Reptin. Oncotarget, 8(5), 7839–7851. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13975.
Schönemeier, B., Metzger, J., Klein, J., Husi, H., Bremer, B., Armbrecht, N., Dakna, M., Schanstra, J. P., Rosendahl, J., Wiegand, J., Jäger, M., Mullen, W., Breuil, B., Plentz, R. R., Lichtinghagen, R., Brand, K., Kühnel, F., Mischak, H., Manns, M. P., & Lankisch, T. O. (2016). Urinary peptide analysis differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas, 45(7), 1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000573.
Carr, J. C., Sherman, S. K., Wang, D., Dahdaleh, F. S., Bellizzi, A. M., O’Dorisio, M. S., O’Dorisio, T. M., & Howe, J. R. (2013). Overexpression of membrane proteins in primary and metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 20(S3), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3318-6.
Schäffler, H., Li, W., Helm, O., Krüger, S., Böger, C., Peters, F., Röcken, C., Sebens, S., Lucius, R., Becker-Pauly, C., & Arnold, P. (2019). The cancer-associated meprin β variant G32R provides an additional activation site and promotes cancer cell invasion. Journal of Cell Science, 132(11), jcs220665. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.220665.
Lottaz, D., Maurer, C. A., Noël, A., Blacher, S., Huguenin, M., Nievergelt, A., Niggli, V., Kern, A., Müller, S., Seibold, F., Friess, H., Becker-Pauly, C., Stöcker, W., & Sterchi, E. E. (2011). Enhanced activity of meprin-α, a pro-migratory and pro-angiogenic protease, in colorectal cancer. PLoS One, 6(11), e26450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026450.
Haber, A. L., Biton, M., Rogel, N., Herbst, R. H., Shekhar, K., Smillie, C., Burgin, G., Delorey, T. M., Howitt, M. R., Katz, Y., Tirosh, I., Beyaz, S., Dionne, D., Zhang, M., Raychowdhury, R., Garrett, W. S., Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Shi, H. N., Yilmaz, O., Xavier, R. J., & Regev, A. (2017). A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature, 551(7680), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24489.
Biasin, V., Wygrecka, M., Bärnthaler, T., Jandl, K., Jain, P. P., Bálint, Z., … Kwapiszewska, G. (2018). Docking of meprin α to heparan sulphate protects the endothelium from inflammatory cell extravasation. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 118(10), 1790–1802. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1670657.
Raman, K., & Kuberan, B. (2010). Chemical tumor biology of heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Current Chemical Biology, 4(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.2174/2212796811004010020.
Rösmann, S., Hahn, D., Lottaz, D., Kruse, M.-N. N., Stöcker, W., & Sterchi, E. E. (2002). Activation of human meprin-α in a cell culture model of colorectal cancer is triggered by the plasminogen-activating system. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(43), 40650–40658. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M206203200.
Minder, P., Bayha, E., Becker-Pauly, C., & Sterchi, E. E. (2012). Meprinα transactivates the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) via ligand shedding, thereby enhancing colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(42), 35201–35211. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.368910.
Matters, G. L., Manni, A., & Bond, J. S. (2005). Inhibitors of polyamine biosynthesis decrease the expression of the metalloproteases meprin α and MMP-7 in hormone-independent human breast cancer cells. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 22(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-005-0660-5.
Manni, A., Washington, S., Mauger, D., Hackett, D. A., & Verderame, M. F. (2004). Cellular mechanisms mediating the anti-invasive properties of the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) in human breast cancer cells. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 21(5), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-004-2724-3.
Rousseau, B., Ménard, L., Haurie, V., Taras, D., Blanc, J.-F., Moreau-Gaudry, F., Metzler, P., Hugues, M., Boyault, S., Lemière, S., Canron, X., Costet, P., Cole, M., Balabaud, C., Bioulac-Sage, P., Zucman-Rossi, J., & Rosenbaum, J. (2007). Overexpression and role of the ATPase and putative DNA helicase RuvB-like 2 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 46(4), 1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21770.
Simonyan, V., & Mazumder, R. (2014). High-performance integrated virtual environment (HIVE) tools and applications for big data analysis. Genes, 5(4), 957–981. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes5040957.
Jefferson, T., Auf Dem Keller, U., Bellac, C., Metz, V. V., Broder, C., Hedrich, J., … Becker-Pauly, C. (2013). The substrate degradome of meprin metalloproteases reveals an unexpected proteolytic link between meprin β and ADAM10. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 70(2), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1106-2.
Bedau, T., Peters, F., Prox, J., Arnold, P., Schmidt, F., Finkernagel, M., Köllmann, S., Wichert, R., Otte, A., Ohler, A., Stirnberg, M., Lucius, R., Koudelka, T., Tholey, A., Biasin, V., Pietrzik, C. U., Kwapiszewska, G., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2017). Ectodomain shedding of CD99 within highly conserved regions is mediated by the metalloprotease meprin β and promotes transendothelial cell migration. FASEB Journal, 31(3), 1226–1237. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201601113R.
Bedau, T., Schumacher, N., Peters, F., Prox, J., Arnold, P., Koudelka, T., … Becker-Pauly, C. (2017). Cancer-associated mutations in the canonical cleavage site do not influence CD99 shedding by the metalloprotease meprin β but alter cell migration in vitro. Oncotarget, 8(33), 54873–54888. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18966.
Dworzak, M. N., Fritsch, G., Buchinger, P., Fleischer, C., Printz, D., Zellner, A., Schöllhammer, A., Steiner, G., Ambros, P. F., & Gadner, H. (1994). Flow cytometric assessment of human MIC2 expression in bone marrow, thymus, and peripheral blood. Blood, 83(2), 415–425.
Schenkel, A. R., Mamdouh, Z., Chen, X., Liebman, R. M., & Muller, W. A. (2002). CD99 plays a major role in the migration of monocytes through endothelial junctions. Nature Immunology, 3(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni749.
Dufour, E. M., Deroche, A., Bae, Y., & Muller, W. A. (2008). CD99 is essential for leukocyte diapedesis in vivo. Cell Communication & Adhesion, 15(4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/15419060802442191.
Fellinger, E. J., Garin-Chesa, P., Triche, T. J., Huvos, A. G., & Rettig, W. J. (1991). Immunohistochemical analysis of Ewing’s sarcoma cell surface antigen p30/32MIC2. The American Journal of Pathology, 139(2), 317–325.
Ambros, I. M., Ambros, P. F., Strehl, S., Kovar, H., Gadner, H., & Salzer-Kuntschik, M. (1991). MIC2 is a specific marker for Ewing’s sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Evidence for a common histogenesis of Ewing’s sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors from MIC2 expression and specific chromosome aberration. Cancer, 67(7), 1886–1893. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19910401)67:7<1886::aid-cncr2820670712>3.0.co;2-u.
Huguenin, M., Müller, E. J., Trachsel-Rösmann, S., Oneda, B., Ambort, D., Sterchi, E. E., & Lottaz, D. (2008). The metalloprotease meprinbeta processes E-cadherin and weakens intercellular adhesion. PLoS One, 3(5), e2153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002153.
Perl, A.-K., Wilgenbus, P., Dahl, U., Semb, H., & Christofori, G. (1998). A causal role for E-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma. Nature, 392(6672), 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/32433.
Birchmeier, W., & Behrens, J. (1994). Cadherin expression in carcinomas: role in the formation of cell junctions and the prevention of invasiveness. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1198(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-419x(94)90003-5.
Dietrich, J. M., Jiang, W., & Bond, J. S. (1996). A novel meprin beta’ mRNA in mouse embryonal and human colon carcinoma cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 271(4), 2271–2278. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.4.2271.
Jiang, W., Kumar, J. M., Matters, G. L., & Bond, J. S. (2000). Structure of the mouse metalloprotease meprin β gene (Mep1b): alternative splicing in cancer cells. Gene, 248(1–2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00143-8.
Matters, G. L., & Bond, J. S. (1999). Expression and regulation of the meprin beta gene in human cancer cells. Molecular Carcinogenesis, 25(3), 169–178.
Becker-Pauly, C., Barré, O., Schilling, O., Auf dem Keller, U., Ohler, A., Broder, C., … Overall, C. M. (2011). Proteomic analyses reveal an acidic prime side specificity for the astacin metalloprotease family reflected by physiological substrates. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 10(9), M111.009233. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.009233.
Grünberg, J., Dumermuth, E., Eldering, J. A., & Sterchi, E. E. (1993). Expression of the alpha subunit of PABA peptide hydrolase (EC 3.4.24.18) in MDCK cells. FEBS Letters, 335(3), 376–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(93)80422-Q.
Paju, A., Vartiainen, J., Haglund, C., Itkonen, O., von Boguslawski, K., Leminen, A., Wahlström, T., & Stenman, U.-H. (2004). Expression of trypsinogen-1, trypsinogen-2, and tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor in ovarian cancer: prognostic study on tissue and serum. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 10(14), 4761–4768. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0204-03.
Bjartell, A., Paju, A., Zhang, W.-M., Gadaleanu, V., Hansson, J., Landberg, G., & Stenman, U.-H. (2005). Expression of tumor-associated trypsinogens (TAT-1 and TAT-2) in prostate cancer. The Prostate, 64(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20236.
Kawano, N., Osawa, H., Ito, T., Nagashima, Y., Hirahara, F., Inayama, Y., Nakatani, Y., Kimura, S., Kitajima, H., Koshikawa, N., Miyazaki, K., & Kitamura, H. (1997). Expression of gelatinase A, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2, matrilysin, and trypsin(ogen) in lung neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study. Human Pathology, 28(5), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(97)90085-X.
Yamamoto, H., Iku, S., Adachi, Y., Imsumran, A., Taniguchi, H., Nosho, K., Min, Y., Horiuchi, S., Yoshida, M., Itoh, F., & Imai, K. (2003). Association of trypsin expression with tumour progression and matrilysin expression in human colorectal cancer. The Journal of Pathology, 199(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1277.
Johansson, M. E. V., & Hansson, G. C. (2016). Immunological aspects of intestinal mucus and mucins. Nature Reviews Immunology, 16(10), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.88.
Wichert, R., Ermund, A., Schmidt, S., Schweinlin, M., Ksiazek, M., Arnold, P., Knittler, K., Wilkens, F., Potempa, B., Rabe, B., Stirnberg, M., Lucius, R., Bartsch, J. W., Nikolaus, S., Falk-Paulsen, M., Rosenstiel, P., Metzger, M., Rose-John, S., Potempa, J., Hansson, G. C., Dempsey, P. J., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2017). Mucus detachment by host metalloprotease meprin β requires shedding of its inactive pro-form, which is abrogated by the pathogenic protease RgpB. Cell Reports, 21(8), 2090–2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.087.
Ahn, J., Sinha, R., Pei, Z., Dominianni, C., Wu, J., Shi, J., Goedert, J. J., Hayes, R. B., & Yang, L. (2013). Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105(24), 1907–1911. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt300.
Vogtmann, E., Hua, X., Zeller, G., Sunagawa, S., Voigt, A. Y., Hercog, R., Goedert, J. J., Shi, J., Bork, P., & Sinha, R. (2016). Colorectal cancer and the human gut microbiome: reproducibility with whole-genome shotgun sequencing. PLoS One, 11(5), e0155362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155362.
Schütte, A., Ermund, A., Becker-Pauly, C., Johansson, M. E. V, Rodriguez-Pineiro, A. M., Bäckhed, F., … Hansson, G. C. (2014). Microbial-induced meprin β cleavage in MUC2 mucin and a functional CFTR channel are required to release anchored small intestinal mucus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(34), 12396–401. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407597111.
Ohler, A., Debela, M., Wagner, S., Magdolen, V., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2010). Analyzing the protease web in skin: meprin metalloproteases are activated specifically by KLK4, 5 and 8 vice versa leading to processing of proKLK7 thereby triggering its activation. Biological Chemistry, 391(4), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1515/bc.2010.023.
Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Q., Gong, Y., Liu, X., Bi, L., & Hu, C. (2016). Upregulation of kallikrein-related peptidase 5 is associated with the malignant behavior of colorectal cancer. Molecular Medicine Reports, 14(3), 2164–2170. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5516.
Papachristopoulou, G., Malachias, A., Devetzi, M., Kamouza, E., Scorilas, A., Xynopoulos, D., & Talieri, M. (2019). Uncovering the clinical impact of kallikrein-related peptidase 5 (KLK5) mRNA expression in the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine., 57, 1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1010.
Jäckle, F., Schmidt, F., Wichert, R., Arnold, P., Prox, J., Mangold, M., Ohler, A., Pietrzik, C. U., Koudelka, T., Tholey, A., Gütschow, M., Stirnberg, M., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2015). Metalloprotease meprin β is activated by transmembrane serine protease matriptase-2 at the cell surface thereby enhancing APP shedding. Biochemical Journal, 470(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20141417.
Becker, C., Kruse, M. N., Slotty, K. A, Kohler, D., Harris, J. R., Rosmann, S., … Stocker, W. (2003). Differences in the activation mechanism between the alpha and beta subunits of human meprin. Biological Chemistry, 384(5), 825–831. https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2003.092.
Kruse, M.-N., Becker, C., Lottaz, D., Köhler, D., Yiallouros, I., Krell, H.-W., … Stöcker, W. (2004). Human meprin alpha and beta homo-oligomers: cleavage of basement membrane proteins and sensitivity to metalloprotease inhibitors. The Biochemical Journal, 378(Pt 2), 383–9. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20031163.
Walker, P. D., Kaushal, G. P., & Shah, S. V. (1998). Meprin A, the major matrix degrading enzyme in renal tubules, produces a novel nidogen fragment in vitro and in vivo. Kidney International, 53(6), 1673–1680. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00949.x.
Sier, C. F. M., Vloedgraven, H. J. M., Ganesh, S., Griffioen, G., Quax, P. H. A., Verheijen, J. H., … Lamers, C. B. H. W. (1994). Inactive urokinase and increased levels of its inhibitor type 1 in colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Gastroenterology, 107(5), 1449–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(94)90549-5.
Hahn, D., Pischitzis, A., Roesmann, S., Hansen, M. K., Leuenberger, B., Luginbuehl, U., & Sterchi, E. E. (2003). Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced ectodomain shedding and phosphorylation of the human meprinbeta metalloprotease. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(44), 42829–42839. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M211169200.
Arnold, P., Boll, I., Rothaug, M., Schumacher, N., Schmidt, F., Wichert, R., Schneppenheim, J., Lokau, J., Pickhinke, U., Koudelka, T., Tholey, A., Rabe, B., Scheller, J., Lucius, R., Garbers, C., Rose-John, S., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2017). Meprin metalloproteases generate biologically active soluble interleukin-6 receptor to induce trans-signaling. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 44053. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44053.
Kentsis, A., Shulman, A., Ahmed, S., Brennan, E., Monuteaux, M. C., Lee, Y.-H., Lipsett, S., Paulo, J. A., Dedeoglu, F., Fuhlbrigge, R., Bachur, R., Bradwin, G., Arditi, M., Sundel, R. P., Newburger, J. W., Steen, H., & Kim, S. (2013). Urine proteomics for discovery of improved diagnostic markers of Kawasaki disease. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 5(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201201494.
Banerjee, S., Jin, G., Bradley, S. G., Matters, G. L., Gailey, R. D., Crisman, J. M., … Bond, J. S. (2011). Balance of meprin A and B in mice affects the progression of experimental inflammatory bowel disease. American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 300(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00504.2009.
Häsler, R., Sheibani-Tezerji, R., Sinha, A., Barann, M., Rehman, A., Esser, D., Aden, K., Knecht, C., Brandt, B., Nikolaus, S., Schäuble, S., Kaleta, C., Franke, A., Fretter, C., Müller, W., Hütt, M. T., Krawczak, M., Schreiber, S., & Rosenstiel, P. (2017). Uncoupling of mucosal gene regulation, mRNA splicing and adherent microbiota signatures in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut, 66(12), 2087–2097. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311651.
Li, Y.-J., Fan, Y.-H., Tang, J., Li, J.-B., & Yu, C.-H. (2014). Meprin-β regulates production of pro-inflammatory factors via a disintegrin and metalloproteinase-10 (ADAM-10) dependent pathway in macrophages. International Immunopharmacology, 18(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2013.11.004.
Cerretti, D. P., Kozlosky, C. J., Mosley, B., Nelson, N., Van Ness, K., Greenstreet, T. A., … Cannizzaro, L. A. (1992). Molecular cloning of the interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme. Science (New York, N.Y.), 256(5053), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1373520.
Thornberry, N. A., Bull, H. G., Calaycay, J. R., Chapman, K. T., Howard, A. D., Kostura, M. J., … Aunins, J. (1992). A novel heterodimeric cysteine protease is required for interleukin-1 beta processing in monocytes. Nature, 356(6372), 768–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/356768a0.
Ghayur, T., Banerjee, S., Hugunin, M., Butler, D., Herzog, L., Carter, A., … Allen, H. (1997). Caspase-1 processes IFN-gamma-inducing factor and regulates LPS-induced IFN-gamma production. Nature, 386(6625), 619–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/386619a0.
Herzog, C., Kaushal, G. P., & Haun, R. S. (2005). Generation of biologically active interleukin-1beta by meprin B. Cytokine, 31(5), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2005.06.012.
Herzog, C., Haun, R. S., Kaushal, V., Mayeux, P. R., Shah, S. V., & Kaushal, G. P. (2009). Meprin A and meprin alpha generate biologically functional IL-1beta from pro-IL-1beta. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 379(4), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.161.
Banerjee, S., & Bond, J. S. (2008). Prointerleukin-18 is activated by meprin beta in vitro and in vivo in intestinal inflammation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283(46), 31371–31377. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802814200.
Wang, Z., Herzog, C., Kaushal, G. P., Gokden, N., & Mayeux, P. R. (2011). Actinonin, a meprin A inhibitor, protects the renal microcirculation during sepsis. Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 35(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181ec39cc.
Shi, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, K., Shi, X., Wang, Y., Huang, H., Zhuang, Y., Cai, T., Wang, F., & Shao, F. (2015). Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature, 526(7575), 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15514.
Kayagaki, N., Stowe, I. B., Lee, B. L., O’Rourke, K., Anderson, K., Warming, S., Cuellar, T., Haley, B., Roose-Girma, M., Phung, Q. T., Liu, P. S., Lill, J. R., Li, H., Wu, J., Kummerfeld, S., Zhang, J., Lee, W. P., Snipas, S. J., Salvesen, G. S., Morris, L. X., Fitzgerald, L., Zhang, Y., Bertram, E. M., Goodnow, C. C., & Dixit, V. M. (2015). Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature, 526(7575), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15541.
Müllberg, J., Dittrich, E., Graeve, L., Gerhartz, C., Yasukawa, K., Taga, T., Kishimoto, T., Heinrich, P. C., & Rose-John, S. (1993). Differential shedding of the two subunits of the interleukin-6 receptor. FEBS Letters, 332(1–2), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(93)80507-q.
Zunke, F., & Rose-John, S. (2017). The shedding protease ADAM17: physiology and pathophysiology. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Cell Research, 1864(11 Pt B), 2059–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.07.001.
Gao, P., & Si, L.-Y. (2010). Meprin-alpha metalloproteases enhance lipopolysaccharide-stimulated production of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta in peripheral blood mononuclear cells via activation of NF-kappaB. Regulatory Peptides, 160(1–3), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2009.12.009.
van Cruijsen, H., Giaccone, G., & Hoekman, K. (2005). Epidermal growth factor receptor and angiogenesis: opportunities for combined anticancer strategies. International Journal of Cancer, 117(6), 883–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21479.
Ferrara, N. (2004). Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocrine Reviews, 25(4), 581–611. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2003-0027.
Vempati, P., Popel, A. S., & Mac Gabhann, F. (2014). Extracellular regulation of VEGF: isoforms, proteolysis, and vascular patterning. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 25(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.11.002.
Schütte, A., Hedrich, J., Stöcker, W., & Becker-Pauly, C. (2010). Let it flow: morpholino knockdown in zebrafish embryos reveals a pro-angiogenic effect of the metalloprotease meprin α2. PLoS One, 5(1), e8835. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008835.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Project-number 125440785 SFB 877 (Proteolysis as a Regulatory Event in Pathophysiology, Projects A9 and A15) and BE 4086/2-2 (C.B.-P.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peters, F., Becker-Pauly, C. Role of meprin metalloproteases in metastasis and tumor microenvironment. Cancer Metastasis Rev 38, 347–356 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-019-09805-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-019-09805-5