Abstract
This study examines the association between dietary patterns and endometrial cancer risk. A case–control study of endometrial cancer was conducted from 1996 to 1999 in the San Francisco Bay Area in white, African-American, and Latina women age 35–79. Dietary patterns were defined using a principal components analysis; scoring dietary intake based on correspondence to a Mediterranean-style diet; and by jointly categorizing intake of fruits/vegetables and dietary fat. Four dietary patterns were identified and labeled “plant-based,” “western,” “ethnic,” and “phytoestrogen-rich.” None of these dietary patterns nor adherence to a Mediterranean diet (to the extent consumed by this population) was associated with endometrial cancer risk. However, among non-users of supplements, greater consumption of the “western” dietary pattern was associated with a 60% increase in risk (95% CI: 0.95–2.7 per unit change; P-interaction = 0.10). A diet characterized by high fat consumption increased risk, regardless of fruit and vegetable consumption (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.97–2.1 for high fat, low fruit/vegetable intake and OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.95–2.1 for high fat, high fruit/vegetable intake compared to low fat, high fruit/vegetable intake). Thus, while like others we found that dietary fat increases endometrial cancer risk, the evaluation of dietary patterns did not provide any additional information regarding risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women behind breast, lung, and colon cancer [1]. Cancer of the uterine corpus (mostly endometrial cancer) has an age-adjusted annual incidence of 22.9 per 100,000 in the United States [2]. The known risk factors for endometrial cancer include obesity, early age at menarche, nulliparity, late age at menopause, use of exogenous estrogens without a progesterone component, and being of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity [3–5].
Most studies addressing the relationship between diet and endometrial cancer risk have focused on individual nutrients, foods or specific groups of foods rather than diet as a whole. Generally, studies examining diet and endometrial cancer risk have found fruit and vegetable intake is associated with reduced risk [6–8], higher dietary fat or energy intake from animal sources is associated with higher risk [6, 8–11], and nutrients, such as fiber and antioxidant vitamins are associated with reduced risk [7, 12, 13], though results have not been entirely consistent. These analyses often have not accounted for the likely additive or synergistic effects of foods and food components in the human body or that in maintaining a consistent caloric intake, people who eat a lot of one class of food (e.g., fruits and vegetables) usually eat less of other types (e.g., red meat) [14–17]. Therefore, it is important to examine dietary patterns that account for the clustering of various foods. Principal components analysis (PCA) is an objective method of data reduction in which individual variables are grouped into components according to how strongly they are correlated; the resulting patterns (or components) are relatively independent and explain the greatest amount of variance [15, 18]. This type of analysis is useful in defining dietary patterns in specific populations and examining diet as a whole [19, 20].
The Mediterranean diet has been identified as a specific dietary pattern associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, and overall mortality [21–24]. It has been noted that Mediterranean countries experience lower incidence of cancer of the colon, breast, endometrium, and prostate [25]. This dietary pattern is characterized by high fruit and vegetable, whole grain, olive oil, and legume intake, moderate dairy, alcohol, and fish intake, and low meat and sweets intake.
Here, we examine several dietary patterns and endometrial cancer risk in the diverse population residing in the San Francisco Bay area.
Materials and methods
Study population
This study utilized data from a population-based case–control study of endometrial cancer among white, African-American, and Latina women in the greater San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose metropolitan area. The methods have been described in detail elsewhere [12]. Briefly, women aged 35–79 were diagnosed with invasive endometrial cancer between 1996 and 1999 were identified using the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry. This regional population-based registry is part of the California Cancer Registry and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programs and is estimated to have over 99% complete ascertainment. Controls were identified using random digit dialing and frequency matched to cases on the basis of age (5-year age groups) and self-identified race/ethnicity (white, African American/Black, and Latina/Hispanic). Interviews were conducted in-person in English or Spanish by trained bilingual, bicultural interviewers. Of those eligible, 647 cases and 633 controls were invited to participate and the final study population consisted of 500 interviewed cases (77% of those invited) and 470 interviewed controls (74% of those invited). The present analysis includes the 488 cases (98% of those interviewed) and 461 controls (98%) with valid dietary data (i.e., women with an average daily caloric intake between 600 and 5,000 kcal). At the time of interview, all participants signed informed consent forms approved by the Northern California Cancer Center Institutional Review Board.
Questionnaire data
Reference year is defined as the year preceding diagnosis (cases) or selection (controls). Data were collected on demographics; menstrual, reproductive, and medical histories (through the reference year); physical activity (from menarche through reference year); dietary intake and use of vitamin supplements (for year preceding the reference year); use of oral contraceptives (OC) and hormone therapy (HT) (through the reference year); and body measurements (measured at interview, and self-reported at age 25–30, age 50–55, and in the reference year). Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) adapted from Block’s Health History and Habits Questionnaire [26, 28]. This questionnaire contained 103 food and beverage items, as well as summary questions regarding fruit and vegetable intake, and use of low fat food items. Information on frequency of intake and portion size was collected. Inorder to improve accuracy of reporting portion sizes, visual aids including abstract models (i.e., various portions of small wood cubes), several meat models, standard size dinner plates, and different size bowls, glasses, and measuring spoons were used.
Statistical analysis
Principal components analysis
Principal components analysis using an orthogonal (varimax) rotation to maximize interpretability and minimize correlation between the factors was used to identify dietary patterns. The frequency of consumption of each of the 103 food and beverage items was adjusted for portion size prior to entering into the PCA. In addition, three vitamin use items were added: single vitamin user, multivitamin user, both single and multivitamin user. PCA was conducted combining both cases and controls. Based on an eigenvalue criterion >1, scree plot analysis, and interpretability, four factors, i.e. dietary patterns, were identified. Factors were labeled descriptively according to the dietary pattern they generally represented: “plant-based,” “western,” “ethnic,” and “phytoestrogen-rich.” Scores for each participant were calculated by SAS using the loadings for all 106 items (103 food and beverage items plus three vitamin use items) by multiplying the scoring coefficient (the simple correlation matrix multiplied by the factor loading matrix) for each item by the standardized servings per day of the item for that individual. In order to estimate risk of endometrial cancer associated with the four dietary patterns, the scores were categorized into quintiles according to the control population distribution.
For comparison, a parallel PCA analysis was conducted based on 21 a priori food groups [defined according to botanical classification for fruits and vegetables and other similarities for the other foods (e.g., beef and pork, processed meats, refined grains, etc.)], 13 singleton foods, and three vitamin supplement use patterns. PCA based on these 37 groups identified two dietary patterns consistent with the “plant-based” and “western” patterns that had been identified based on the food-specific analysis and were similarly not associated with endometrial cancer risk (data not shown).
The Mediterranean diet score
Adherence to a Mediterranean diet was measured by three ways. First, using the method established by Trichopoulou et al. [23, 29], individuals were given one point for adherence to each of nine components of the Mediterranean diet (i.e., high monounsaturated-to-saturated fat ratio, high consumption of fish, fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes, moderate consumption of alcohol, low consumption of dairy products and meat). High versus low intake was defined as above or below the median intake in the control population for each food, with the exception of alcohol, which was given a score of one only if consumption was between 5 g and 25 g of ethanol per day. Second, using the method of Goulet et al. [30] individuals were scored on a scale of 0–4 on each of 11 components of the Mediterranean diet, for a maximum of 44 points. While Goulet was able to score olive oil intake on a scale of 0–4 based on the number of times used per day, the present study only collected information on whether participants used olive oil for cooking (categorized as no olive oil, olive oil and another type of fat, or olive oil only), thus we assigned participants scores of 0–2 on this component of the diet for a maximum of 42 points. The components used by Goulet et al. [30] differed from those used by Trichopoulou et al. [23] in that the ratio of monounsaturated-to-saturated fat and alcohol were not included in the scoring, but the consumption of olive oil, poultry, red meat, eggs, and sweets were included. The third method used was a modified version of Goulet’s scoring in which quintiles of the food groups in our control population were used to determine the scoring cut-points, but following the same pattern as Goulet’s scoring method. In addition, alcohol was included in this modified scoring system. Total scores, based on each of the three methods above, were calculated by summing the points for each component. Quintiles of the scores in the control population were used to create categories for evaluating exposure-disease associations.
The joint effects of fruits/vegetables and dietary fat
The joint effects of fruits and vegetables and dietary fat were examined by creating a variable with four levels based on categorizing total fruit and vegetable as above or below median (i.e., <2 vs. ≥2 servings/d), and percent fat based on its association with endometrial cancer risk (i.e., <33% and ≥33% of calories from fat per day).
Unconditional logistic regression
Unconditional multiple logistic regression was used to determine the risk of endometrial cancer associated with each dietary pattern. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each quintile relative to the lowest quintile. The patterns were also examined using the continuous scores. Confounders included in all final models were age (in years), age2 (due to the better fit of the model with a polynomial form of this variable), race/ethnicity (white, African American, Latina), age at menarche (in years), use of OC (years of use), parity (continuous), average daily caloric intake (in kilocalories), average weekly physical activity (in hours per week during the period from menarche through the reference year), and the 2-way and 3-way interaction terms defining the joint effects of menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal, and “could not be determined”), use of hormone therapy (years of use), and body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms/height in meters2). Menopausal status was classified as “could not be determined” when hormone therapy use preceded the cessation of menstrual periods, and the participant had not reached age 60 prior to diagnosis or selection, i.e., was presumed to still have functioning ovaries. All four factors were included in each model when examining patterns from PCA. Tests for trend were examined over quintiles based on the median value of each quintile. A likelihood ratio test was then used to compare models with and without this ordinal variable.
Subgroup analyses
Associations between each dietary pattern and endometrial cancer risk were evaluated within subgroups defined by use of supplements (i.e., multi-vitamins or single vitamin A, C, E, or beta-carotene supplements) and included 204 cases and 205 controls who did not use supplements in the reference year and 283 cases and 255 controls who did. Of the 538 women taking supplements during the reference year, 132 were taking a multivitamin, 70 were taking at least one single antioxidant vitamin, and 336 were taking both a multivitamin and at least one other single vitamin. In addition we examined the dietary patterns by “high risk” or “low risk” subgroups based on the associations between individual variables and endometrial cancer risk. The “high risk” group included overweight women (BMI ≥ 30) and/or women who had used HT for five or more years (319 cases and 196 controls). All other women were considered low risk. The relative risk of developing endometrial cancer associated with being in the “high risk” subgroup was 2.7 (95% CI: 2.0–3.6). Statistical interaction among subgroups was formally assessed by performing a likelihood ratio test comparing models with and without cross-product terms.
Results
Table 1 presents the distribution of endometrial cancer risk factors for the study participants. Briefly, cases reported consuming fewer calories, had a higher BMI, engaged in fewer hours of physical activity, were more likely to be nulliparous and to use HT, and less likely to have used OCs. Interviewed cases were slightly older and less likely to be Latina than interviewed controls; however, substantial overlap was still observed.
Principal components analysis identified four dietary patterns that we labeled “plant-based,” “western,” “ethnic,” and “phytoestrogen-rich.” These four factors accounted for 15.4% of the variance in the 106 food and beverage items (i.e., 4.5%, 3.8%, 3.7%, and 3.4%, respectively). The diet of 28% of the participants was characterized by a single pattern (defined as having a score greater than the median for only one factor); 21% had diets that were characterized by a combination including two or three of the “plant-based”, “ethnic”, and “phytoestrogen-rich” diets; and 44% by a combination of the western diet and at least one of the other three patterns. The diet of 7% of the participants was not characterized by any of these patterns. The factor loadings for the foods associated with each pattern (loading ≥0.35) are shown in Table 2. The “plant-based” pattern was predominately characterized by consumption of fruits and vegetables and the “western” pattern by convenience and processed foods and sweets. The “ethnic” pattern was composed mostly of tortillas, cornbread, beans, cheese dishes such as macaroni and cheese, and traditional Latino dishes, e.g., tacos and burritos. About 76% of Latina women, 8% of white women, and 26% of African American women scored in the highest quartile of this factor. The “phytoestrogen-rich” diet included tofu, sprouts, miso soup, and selected vegetables. None of these patterns was associated with overall risk of endometrial cancer (Table 3). However, the western pattern was more strongly associated with risk among women not using supplements (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.95–2.7 per unit change in the factor score) than among users (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.57–1.2), though the difference between these two groups did not reach statistical significance (P interaction = 0.10). No meaningful variation between “low risk” and “high risk” groups was observed [data not shown].
Regardless of how it was defined in this population, the Mediterranean diet pattern was not associated with endometrial cancer risk in the overall population (OR for modified scoring method = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.59–1.4 for the highest versus lowest quintile; OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–1.0 for continuous score). Results in subgroups defined by “risk,” ethnicity, and supplement use were not significant.
Figure 1 presents the joint effects of dietary fat and fruit and vegetable consumption on endometrial cancer risk. Compared to women consuming a low fat, high fruit and vegetable diet, women consuming a high fat diet were at increased risk of endometrial cancer regardless of fruit and vegetable intake (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.97–2.1 for low fruit/vegetable intake and OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.95–2.1 for high fruit/vegetable intake). Women consuming a low fat, low fruit and vegetable diet were at a slightly but not statistically significant increased risk (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.77–1.8). No meaningful differences were observed between the subgroups of interest.
Discussion
Out of the four dietary patterns identified using PCA, none was associated with overall endometrial cancer risk. The “western” diet was associated with a nonsignificant increased risk among women who did not use supplements, but not among supplement users. This finding suggests a possible undoing of the negative health effects of a western-style diet by the use of supplemental vitamins. However, the statistical power for detecting an interaction was low and the observed differences did not reach statistical significance. In addition to examining PCA-defined dietary patterns, we looked at the joint effects of dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake. A high-fat diet was associated with a nonsignificant increase in risk regardless of fruit and vegetable intake, although the intake of fruits and vegetables was relatively low in this population (median intake was two servings per day). This association was not modified by supplement use. Thus, taken together, these findings suggest the possibility that supplements may be modifying a component of the western diet other than dietary fat alone. However, replication is necessary before any conclusions can be drawn.
Various hypotheses exist regarding dietary micronutrients and cancer prevention, including increasing DNA repair, decreasing DNA damage, reduction of cell proliferation, and protection from oxidative damage [31]. The literature on the relationship between antioxidants and endometrial cancer is mixed. Some studies have found risk to be reduced among women consuming greater amounts of various antioxidants from foods and supplements [7, 8], though not all studies share these findings [6, 10, 11, 32]. However, these studies have focused on single nutrients and therefore, may not have appropriately captured the complexity of diet. It is not clear in our study whether the possible modification of the “western” dietary pattern by use of antioxidant supplements is due to their biologic effect or simply reflects behaviors associated with a healthy lifestyle. However, when the patterns were examined by strata of BMI and physical activity, no subgroup differences were observed (data not shown), suggesting that if the effect is not biologic, it is an artifact of some other unmeasured lifestyle factor.
We did not observe any overall association between endometrial cancer risk and the dietary patterns designated as “plant-based,” “ethnic,” and “phytoestrogen-rich.” This is somewhat in contrast to the findings of the smaller Western New York case–control study, which is the only other study to our knowledge that has examined dietary patterns and endometrial cancer risk [33]. This study found two dietary patterns (“healthy” and “high fat”) using PCA and reported reduced risk estimates associated with a “healthy” dietary pattern and no association between a ‘high fat’ dietary pattern and endometrial cancer risk. Subgroup differences were not considered in the New York study. The population in the New York study is very different from our population. For instance, the age adjusted incidence rate of cancer of the corpus uteri the Greater Bay Area from 1999 to 2003 was 22.7 per 100,000 women per year whereas in the state of New York the age adjusted incidence rate was 26.1 per 100,000 women per year [34]. The Western New York study contains a much smaller percentage of women taking hormone therapy (28% of cases and 18% of controls compared to 55% of cases and 48% of controls in our population) [7]. In addition, about 15% of our population were Latina, whereas the study population in the Western New York consists only of white women [35]. Latina women in the U.S. have a lower age-adjusted incidence of endometrial cancer than do non-Hispanic white women [36]. In examining low risk groups where risk is not overwhelmed by stronger risk factors, it may be more readily possible to observe dietary effects which are generally associated only with moderate changes in risk.
While only one study has examined dietary patterns and endometrial cancer risk, there have been quite a few studies that have examined dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer, a cancer that shares many risk factors with endometrial cancer [37–43]. Like our study and the one conducted in Western New York for endometrial cancer, studies on dietary patterns and breast cancer have found differing and potentially contradictory results or results only in specific subgroups [37–43]. Nonetheless, additional low-cost studies using existing data may help to resolve these potential conflicts and provide a more unified body of evidence. When taken together with studies of individual or combinations of specific food components and taking into account population differences and risk in various subgroups, studies of dietary patterns may add to the understanding of cancer risk [15]. In the meantime, they may be useful for making public health recommendations within the specific populations under study.
The Mediterranean diet did not impact endometrial cancer risk in this study. Several authors have hypothesized a lower risk of breast and endometrial cancer associated with this dietary pattern [25, 44, 45]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine adherence to a Mediterranean diet and endometrial cancer risk. However, the level at which a Mediterranean-style diet is consumed by our population is low. Compared to control women in our population, Greek women consumed substantially more fruit (median: 356 g/d compared to 171 g/d), vegetables (500 g/d compared to106 g/d), and dairy products (191 g/d compared to 70 g/d), and had a somewhat higher monounsaturated to saturated fat ratio (mean: 1.8 compared to 1.1) [23]. Therefore, women in our study may simply not be consuming enough of a Mediterranean-type diet to see effects.
In our study, grouping foods into 37 a priori groups produced only two dietary patterns, neither of which was associated with endometrial cancer risk, even when subgroups were examined (data not shown). Similarly, in the western New York study [33], patterns based on either 58 or 38 a priori groups diminished the magnitude of effect and produced wider confidence intervals compared to the patterns identified based on 168 individual food items. These authors have concluded that greater specificity is optimal when entering individual food items into PCA [33]. Our findings support this approach, given the identification of an additional two patterns (subsets of the overall plant-based pattern) and a greater percent of variance explained (15.4% vs. 9.2%) when individual foods were used as the basis for the PCA compared to a priori groups.
Several limitations of the present study should be kept in mind when interpreting the findings. First, the four major patterns obtained from the principal components analysis explain a little more than 15% of the variance. While this is comparable to what other diet studies have found [33, 42, 46–48], it depicts the difficulty of reducing a large and complex set of variables such as diet. However, since dietary intake is complex and a wide variety of foods are needed for basic nutrition, more consideration should be placed on the interpretability of the dietary patterns identified rather than a quantitative measure of the amount of explained variance by these factors [7]. Indeed, in the present study only 7% of women did not consume one of these four dietary patterns (i.e., scored below the median value on all four dietary patterns). Second, a limitation in many epidemiologic studies, particularly those of diet, is measurement error. While many nutrients are captured equally well with a FFQ as with other dietary measures (e.g., dietary records) [49], only one study has attempted to validate dietary patterns measured by a FFQ compared with patterns characterized from dietary records. Hu et al. compared PCA-defined “prudent” and “western” dietary patterns based on an FFQ assessment to these patterns estimated from two 1-week diet records among 127 men [50]. Validity coefficients between two FFQ assessments and diet records ranged from 0.45 to 0.74 for the two patterns; the reproducibility coefficients were 0.70 for the “prudent” pattern and 0.67 for the “western” pattern. These correlations are of a similar magnitude to what is seen for various macro- and micronutrients in various validation studies [25, 51–54], suggesting that the methods used in the present study are appropriate for identifying patterns of dietary consumption. A third concern in case–control studies is recall bias. Cases may recall or report diet differently than controls, particularly, since diet and cancer have been linked in the media for many years. However, studies have shown that current diet influences recall of previous diet, but that recalled diet is a better measure of previous diet than is current diet; the shorter the interval between consumption and recall, the better the recall; reports of previous intake are more accurate when food-frequency instruments are administered by trained interviewers than when self-administered; recall is better when complete diet is measured than when only a few items are asked about; and adjusting nutrient intake for portion size results in better estimates of nutrient intake [55–58]. These considerations were incorporated into the design of the present study. A final common limitation when conducting subgroup analyses is insufficient power, thus stratified results must be interpreted with caution. Basing interpretation on the amount of overlap in the confidence intervals between the subgroups of interest and conducting formal tests of statistical interaction help avoid over-interpretation.
In examining complex diseases, a comprehensive approach to diet, such as examining dietary patterns, may be informative, particularly in terms of public health messages. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between the Mediterranean diet pattern and endometrial cancer risk. Replication of the current study in large, low risk populations is warranted. In addition to various factor analysis methods used to identify dietary patterns, other techniques such as those being developed for microarray and other multidimensional data, may be useful in treating the complex nature of dietary data in future analyses.
In summary, the current study did not find any association between dietary patterns defined using PCA and endometrial cancer risk in the overall population. There was some evidence of an interaction between supplement use and the “Western” pattern, however, results did not reach statistical significance and replication is clearly necessary before appropriate conclusions can be drawn. The Mediterranean diet was not associated with endometrial cancer risk at the level consumed in our population. A diet high in fat was associated with a non-significant increase in endometrial cancer risk, regardless of fruit and vegetable intake. This study adds to the limited data available regarding dietary patterns and endometrial cancer risk.
References
Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (1999) Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 49(1):8–31
National Program of Cancer Registries (2001) Data Collection and Surveillance: 2001 Cancer Data by Site and Race. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Bocciolone L, Franceschi S (1991) The epidemiology of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 41(1):1–16
Weiss JM, Saltzman BS, Doherty JA, Voigt LF, Chen C, Beresford SA et al (2006) Risk factors for the incidence of endometrial cancer according to the aggressiveness of disease. Am J Epidemiol 164(1):56–62
Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I (2005) Endometrial cancer. Lancet 366(9484):491–505
Terry P, Vainio H, Wolk A, Weiderpass E (2002) Dietary factors in relation to endometrial cancer: a nationwide case–control study in Sweden. Nutr Cancer 42(1):25–32
McCann SE, Freudenheim JL, Marshall JR, Brasure JR, Swanson MK, Graham S (2000) Diet in the epidemiology of endometrial cancer in western New York (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11(10):965–974
Littman AJ, Beresford SA, White E (2001) The association of dietary fat and plant foods with endometrial cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12(8):691–702
Zheng W, Kushi LH, Potter JD, Sellers TA, Doyle TJ, Bostick RM et al (1995) Dietary intake of energy and animal foods and endometrial cancer incidence. The Iowa women’s health study. Am J Epidemiol 142(4):388–394
Potischman N, Swanson CA, Brinton LA, McAdams M, Barrett RJ, Berman ML et al (1993) Dietary associations in a case–control study of endometrial cancer. Cancer Causes Control 4(3):239–250
Jain MG, Rohan TE, Howe GR, Miller AB (2000) A cohort study of nutritional factors and endometrial cancer. Eur J Epidemiol 16(10):899–905
Horn-Ross PL, John EM, Canchola AJ, Stewart SL, Lee MM (2003) Phytoestrogen intake and endometrial cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(15):1158–1164
Goodman MT, Wilkens LR, Hankin JH, Lyu LC, Wu AH, Kolonel LN (1997) Association of soy and fiber consumption with the risk of endometrial cancer. Am J Epidemiol 146(4):294–306
National Research Council-Committee on Diet and Health (1989) Diet and health: implications for reducing chronic disease risk. Washington, DC
Hu FB (2002) Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol 13(1):3–9
Jacques PF, Tucker KL (2001) Are dietary patterns useful for understanding the role of diet in chronic disease? Am J Clin Nutr 73(1):1–2
Kant AK (2004) Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 104(4):615–635
Kleinbaum D, Kupper LL, Muller KE (1988) Chapter 24: variable reduction and factor analysis. In: Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston, Massachusettes, pp 595–640
Hoffman K, Schulze MB, Boeing H, Altenburg HP (2002) Dietary patterns: report of an international workshop. Public Health Nutr 5(1):89–90
Jacobs DR Jr, Steffen LM (2003) Nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns as exposures in research: a framework for food synergy. Am J Clin Nutr 78(3 Suppl):508S–513S
Trichopoulou A, Kouris-Blazos A, Wahlqvist ML, Gnardellis C, Lagiou P, Polychronopoulos E et al (1995) Diet and overall survival in elderly people. Bmj 311(7018):1457–1460
Trichopoulou A, Bamia C, Trichopoulos D (2005) Mediterranean diet and survival among patients with coronary heart disease in Greece. Arch Intern Med 165(8):929–935
Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C, Trichopoulos D (2003) Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med 348(26):2599–2608
Bosetti C, Gallus S, Trichopoulou A, Talamini R, Franceschi S, Negri E et al (2003) Influence of the Mediterranean diet on the risk of cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(10):1091–1094
Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P, Kuper H, Trichopoulos D (2000) Cancer and Mediterranean dietary traditions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9(9):869–873
Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L (1986) A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 124(3):453–469
Horn-Ross PL, Barnes S, Lee M, Coward L, Mandel JE, Koo J et al (2000) Assessing phytoestrogen exposure in epidemiologic studies: development of a database (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11(4):289–298
Horn-Ross PL (2001) Assessing phytoestrogen exposure via a food-frequency questionnaire. Cancer Causes Control 12(5):477–478
Costacou T, Bamia C, Ferrari P, Riboli E, Trichopoulos D, Trichopoulou A (2003) Tracing the Mediterranean diet through principal components and cluster analyses in the Greek population. Eur J Clin Nutr 57(11):1378–1385
Goulet J, Lamarche B, Nadeau G, Lemieux S (2003) Effect of a nutritional intervention promoting the Mediterranean food pattern on plasma lipids, lipoproteins and body weight in healthy French-Canadian women. Atherosclerosis 170(1):115–124
Steinmetz KA, Potter JD (1996) Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 96(10):1027–1039
Jain MG, Howe GR, Rohan TE (2000) Nutritional factors and endometrial cancer in Ontario, Canada. Cancer Control 7(3):288–296
McCann SE, Marshall JR, Brasure JR, Graham S, Freudenheim JL (2001) Analysis of patterns of food intake in nutritional epidemiology: food classification in principal components analysis and the subsequent impact on estimates for endometrial cancer. Public Health Nutr 4(5):989–997
The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries: Average-annual Registry-specific Cancer Incidence by Race and Sex 1999–2003
Freudenheim JL, Marshall JR, Vena JE, Laughlin R, Brasure JR, Swanson MK et al (1996) Premenopausal breast cancer risk and intake of vegetables, fruits, and related nutrients. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(6):340–348
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 13 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2004 Sub (1992-2002), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch
Velie EM, Schairer C, Flood A, He JP, Khattree R, Schatzkin A (2005) Empirically derived dietary patterns and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a large prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 82(6):1308–1319
Fung TT, Hu FB, Holmes MD, Rosner BA, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA et al (2005) Dietary patterns and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 116(1):116–121
Mannisto S, Dixon LB, Balder HF, Virtanen MJ, Krogh V, Khani BR et al (2005) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: results from three cohort studies in the DIETSCAN project. Cancer Causes Control 16(6):725–733
Terry P, Suzuki R, Hu FB, Wolk A (2001) A prospective study of major dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(12):1281–1285
Sieri S, Krogh V, Pala V, Muti P, Micheli A, Evangelista A et al (2004) Dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer in the ORDET cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(4):567–572
Nkondjock A, Ghadirian P (2005) Associated nutritional risk of breast and colon cancers: a population-based case–control study in Montreal, Canada. Cancer Lett 223(1):85–91
Adebamowo CA, Hu FB, Cho E, Spiegelman D, Holmes MD, Willett WC (2005) Dietary patterns and the risk of breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol 15(10):789–795
La Vecchia C (2004) Mediterranean diet and cancer. Public Health Nutr 7(7):965–968
Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Estruch R (2004) Mediterranean diet, antioxidants and cancer: the need for randomized trials. Eur J Cancer Prev 13(4):327–335
Slattery ML, Boucher KM, Caan BJ, Potter JD, Ma KN (1998) Eating patterns and risk of colon cancer. Am J Epidemiol 148(1):4–16
Osler M, Heitmann BL, Gerdes LU, Jorgensen LM, Schroll M (2001) Dietary patterns and mortality in Danish men and women: a prospective observational study. Br J Nutr 85(2):219–225
Dixon LB, Balder HF, Virtanen MJ, Rashidkhani B, Mannisto S, Krogh V et al (2004) Dietary patterns associated with colon and rectal cancer: results from the Dietary Patterns and Cancer (DIETSCAN) Project. Am J Clin Nutr 80(4):1003–1011
Willett W (1990) Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York
Hu FB, Rimm E, Smith-Warner SA, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A et al (1999) Reproducibility and validity of dietary patterns assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire. Am J Clin Nutr 69(2):243–249
Munger RG, Folsom AR, Kushi LH, Kaye SA, Sellers TA (1992) Dietary assessment of older Iowa women with a food frequency questionnaire: nutrient intake, reproducibility, and comparison with 24-hour dietary recall interviews. Am J Epidemiol 136(2):192–200
Stram DO, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, Pike MC, Monroe KR, Park S et al (2000) Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol 151(4):358–370
Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Ritz J, Albanes D, Beeson WL, Bernstein L et al (2006) Methods for pooling results of epidemiologic studies: the Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer. Am J Epidemiol 163(11):1053–1064
Willett WC, Sampson L, Browne ML, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Hennekens CH et al (1988) The use of a self-administered questionnaire to assess diet four years in the past. Am J Epidemiol 27(1):188–199
Bazzarre TL, Myers MP (1979) The collection of food intake data in cancer epidemiology studies. Nutr Cancer 1:22–45
Chu SY, Kolonel LN, Hankin JH, Lee J (1984) A comparison of frequency and quantitative dietary methods for epidemiologic studies of diet and disease. Am J Epidemiol 119(3):323–334
Thompson FE, Lamphiear DE, Metzner HL, Hawthorne VM, Oh MS (1987) Reproducibility of reports of frequency of food use in the Tecumseh Diet Methodology Study. Am J Epidemiol 125(4):658–671
Wilkens LR, Hankin JH, Yoshizawa CN, Kolonel LN, Lee J (1992) Comparison of long-term dietary recall between cancer cases and noncases. Am J Epidemiol 136(7):825–835
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank to Dr. Gladys Block for her review and comments on this article. This research was supported by grants R03 CA110929 and R01 CA74877 from the National Cancer Institute. The funding sources did not contribute to the design or conduct of the study, nor to the writing or submission of this manuscript. The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Health Services (as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885) and the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Northern California Cancer Center. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and endorsement by the State of California Department of Health Services and the National Cancer Institute is not intended nor should be inferred.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalvi, T.B., Canchola, A.J. & Horn-Ross, P.L. Dietary patterns, Mediterranean diet, and endometrial cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 18, 957–966 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9037-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9037-1