Abstract
Multiple coactivator and corepressor complexes play an important role in endocrine processes and breast cancer; in particular, estrogen and estrogen receptor-α (ERα) promote the proliferation of breast cancer cells. Menin is a tumor suppressor encoded by Men1 that is mutated in the human-inherited tumor syndrome multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1); it also serves as a critical link in the recruitment of nuclear receptor-mediated transcription. Here, we show that menin expressed in breast cancer cell line MCF-7 is colocalized with ERα and functions as a direct coactivator of ER-mediated transcription in breast cancer cells. In MCF-7 cells, coexpression of menin and estrogen-response element-luciferase induced the activity of the latter in a hormone-dependent manner. Cells knocked down for ERα exhibited impaired ERE-luciferase activity induced by menin. Mammalian two-hybrid assay and GST pull-down assays indicated that menin could interact with the AF-2 domain of ERα. These results indicate that menin is a direct activator of ERα function. Tamoxifen inhibited the binding of menin to AF-2 in mammalian two-hybrid assay, but in menin-overexpressing clones, tamoxifen suppressed ERE-luciferase activity only to the levels of nontreated wild-type MCF-7. In a clinical study with 65 ER-positive breast cancer samples—all of which had been treated with tamoxifen for 2–5 years as adjuvant therapies—menin-positive tumors had a worse outcome than menin-negative ones. These indicated that menin can function as a transcriptional regulator of ERα and is a possible predictive factor for tamoxifen resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Estrogen and estrogen receptor (ER) play an important role in the development of mammary glands and in the genesis, growth, and progression of breast cancer [1]. ERα is a ligand-activated nuclear receptor that regulates the transcription of estrogen-responsive genes in diverse target cells. ERα and its ligand 17-estradiol not only play a critical role in normal breast development but also have long been linked to mammary carcinogenesis, breast cancer progression, and outcomes of breast cancer patients [2]. Given the fact that 17-estradiol stimulates the growth of ER-positive breast tumors via functional ERs, endocrine therapy such as the use of antiestrogens or ovarian ablation has been established as an important part of breast cancer management [3]. Clinically, ERα is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, and the measurement of its expression is applied to the determinants of hormone therapy in these cancer patients. At the onset, approximately 70% of breast cancers are ER positive, and up to 70% of these ER-positive cancers respond to hormone therapy [4, 5]. As with hormonal regulation, the transcriptional activity of ER is affected by a number of regulatory cofactors, including chromatin remodeling complexes, coactivators, and corepressors [6–10]. Examples of ER coactivators include members of the p160 family, namely, SRC1–3, AIB1, TRAM1, RAC3, cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein CBP, and p300 [11, 12].
Menin is a tumor suppressor encoded by Men1 that is mutated in the human inherited tumor syndrome multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) [13, 14]. MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple endocrine tumors of the parathyroid glands, pancreatic islets, and anterior pituitary [15, 16]. Although the primary sequence of menin is highly conserved from fly to humans, it does not show obvious homology to known protein motifs, thereby making it difficult to elucidate its biochemical function. Recent studies have shown that menin regulates cell proliferation [17–19], apoptosis [20, 21], and genome stability [22–24]. Menin interacts with several transcription factors such as Jun D and NF-B and yeast SET1-like complex containing the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) protein [25–29].
Multiple coactivator and corepressor complexes play an important role in endocrine processes and breast cancer [1]. In the present study, we report that menin could function as a direct coactivator of ER-mediated transcription in breast cancer cells and that menin could be a novel predictive factor for tamoxifen resistance in clinical preliminary study. These results provide a molecular mechanism for the recruitment of ERα-menin complexes and could provide an explanation for the clinical manifestations of breast cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 was obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD) and maintained routinely in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco BRL), 1 nM of 17β-estradiol (E2, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), 100 units/ml penicillin G, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. For experiments evaluating the effect of E2, cells were cultured in phenol red-free RPMI 1640 (PRF-RPMI, Gibco BRL) containing 10% FBS stripped of steroids by absorption onto dextran-coated charcoal (DCC-FBS). COS-7 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 nM of E2, 100 units/ml penicillin G, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin.
Western blot
An anti-menin antiserum was generated using a recombinant peptide (amino acid residues 443–535 of menin); the homology of this peptide sequence between humans and rat is 87% . This antibody recognized both human and rat menin as described previously [30]. The preadsorption test of the antiserum showed complete disappearance of a 67-kDa band in Western blotting. Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes, and the membranes were incubated with a 1:3,000 dilution of anti-menin antiserum [31]. The membranes were further incubated with a 1:3,000 dilution of goat anti-guinea pig IgG coupled to horseradish peroxidase. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by the ECL system (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).
Immunohistochemistry staining
Fixation, paraffin embedding, and serial sectioning were performed as described previously. The primary antibodies used were anti-menin rabbit polyclonal antibody A300-105A (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc., Montgomery, TX). Briefly, for menin staining, after deparaffinization, the sections were microwaved at 98°C for 15 min in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval, soaked in 0.3% H2O2 methanol solution for 30 min, and then incubated in 4% blocking ace solution (Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Co., Osaka, Japan) for 60 min to prevent nonspecific staining. The primary antibody was used at a 1:250 dilution and incubated at 4°C overnight. After three washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Envision Plus solution (Dako, Kyoto, Japan) was applied for 30 min at room temperature. The sections were developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Nichirei, Co., Tokyo, Japan) and counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. The normal rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) was used as a negative control to observe no staining.
Immunofluorescence staining
Formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples were serially cut into 4-μm-thick sections for staining. Antigens were retrieved by boiling the sections in 0.01 M citric buffer (pH 6.0) for 15 min. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies 1D5 (Dako) for ERα and A-300 (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.) for menin, and the final concentrations were 1:50 and 1:250 of anti-ERα and anti-menin antibodies, respectively. In all cases, isotype-matched monoclonal antibodies were used as a negative control. The sections were washed with PBS and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature in a 1:400 diluted cocktail of Alexa Fluor 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa Fluor 568-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The sections were finally washed with PBS and mounted. Fluorescence signals and digital images were acquired with an Olympus FluoView™FV1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed using FV10-ASW image analysis software (Version 1.5, Olympus).
Plasmid construction
The protein coding region (1,833 bp) of the human menin cDNA [18] was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers that included two recognition sites of restriction enzymes (NotI and BamHI) (ATT AGG ATC CAT GGG GCT GAA GGC CGC CCA and ATG CGG CCG CTC AGA GGC CTT TGC GCT GCC, respectively), as described previously [20]. After digestion with NotI and BamH1, the PCR products were purified and inserted into the plasmid vector pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen, Groningen, the Netherlands). Plasmids pCMX-GAL4 and pCMX-VP16 for mammalian two-hybrid experiments were kindly provided by Dr. K. Umesono (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) together with the reporter tk-GALpx3-Luc possessing the GAL4-binding sequence [32]. An internal control plasmid for luciferase assay, pRL-TK, was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). To construct the expression plasmids of fusion protein with GAL4 DNA-binding domain or VP16 activation domain, EcoRI and BamHI sites were designed adjacent to the initiation and termination codons of the inserted ERα cDNA and menin cDNA, respectively [33]. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein expression vectors were constructed as follows: full-length ERα cDNA fragments were ligated into the pGEX-2T vector (GE Healthcare). The sequences of all constructed plasmids were confirmed using ABI Prism 310 automatic DNA sequencer.
Transfection of small interfering RNA
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were designed to target the following cDNA sequences: ERα scrambled siRNA, 5′-CCCUUAUCGCUCUCAGUAAGA-3′; and ERα-specific siRNA, 5′-GUCAUCGCAUUCCUUGCAAAC-3′ (Nihon Bioservice, Kanagawa, Japan). Transfection of the siRNAs was performed using siPORT Amine (Ambion, Austin, TX). At 3 days after transfection, ERα protein expression was examined by Western blot analysis.
Transfection of MCF-7 cells and luciferase reporter gene assay
The estrogen-responsive reporter plasmid ptk-ERE-Luc was constructed by insertion of estrogen response element (ERE) (59-AGC TAG GTC AGG ATG ACC TAG CTA-39) into the HindIII site of the tk-luciferase plasmid [32]. The purified reporter plasmid was transfected into MCF-7 cells (at 60% confluence) by a conventional cationic liposome transfection method (Lipofectamine, Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). All assays were corrected for β-galactosidase activity, and the total amount of protein in each reaction was identical as described previously [34]. Twenty-microliter aliquots were taken for the luciferase assay, which was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ToyoInk, Tokyo, Japan).
Protein–protein interaction assay using the mammalian two-hybrid system
COS-7 cells were cultured in 60-mm-diameter dishes in phenol red-free Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10% charcoal dextran-treated FBS. The reporter plasmid tk-GALpx3-Luc (1 mg) was cotransfected with pCMX-VP16-menin (0.1 mg) and pCMX-GAL4-ER (0.1 mg) by the conventional cationic liposome transfection method (Lipofectamine). After 4 h incubation, the medium was replaced with fresh phenol red-free Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% charcoal dextran-treated FBS and with or without 10 nM E2. The luciferase activity was measured as described previously.
Stable transfection
The menin expression vector was transfected into the cultured MCF-7 cells by the conventional cationic liposome transfection method as described previously [35]. The transfected cells were selected by the addition of G418 to the media, and clones showing high menin production were identified by Western blot analysis.
GST pull-down and in vitro binding assays
GST-ERα fusion protein was expressed in bacteria and bound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia) beads as described previously [32, 36]. In vitro translation for the linearized expression vectors containing menin cDNA was performed with [35S]methionine by using the TNT kit (Promega) as described previously [37]. For the GST pull-down assay, a 50% suspension of GST-protein beads (50 ml), which contained up to 1.0 mg of protein, was resuspended in the same volume of binding buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.5], 0.12 M NaCl, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol, 0.055% 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40). An aliquot (15 ml) of the in vitro translation reaction mixture was mixed with GST-protein beads and suspended for 1 h at 4°C. The beads were then washed four times with washing buffer (replacing 0.12 M NaCl in the binding buffer with 0.1 M NaCl) and resuspended in sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) sample buffer. After electrophoresis, radiolabeled proteins were visualized with an image analyzer (BAS2000; Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan).
Patients
Sixty-five women aged more than 37 years with breast cancer were enrolled in the study, and provided informed consent. The median age was 60 years, and the median observation period was 103 months. Tamoxifen had been administrated as adjuvant therapy and was administered to all of the patients for 2–5 years. This study was carried out according to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and specific approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Kagawa Medical University.
Immunohistochemical analysis
Immunohistochemical staining of sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was performed with antibodies to menin and an EnVision+, Peroxidase, Rabbit System (Dako, Kyoto, Japan). In brief, sections (thickness, 4 μm) were heated at 100°C for 16 min in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6), subjected to paraffin removal, and rehydrated. After quenching of endogenous peroxidase activity with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide, the sections were treated for 2 h at room temperature with 5% bovine serum albumin to block nonspecific staining. They were then incubated at room temperature first overnight with primary antibodies (5 μg/ml), and then streptavidin-biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies. 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was used as the chromogen. An immunoglobulin fraction isolated from normal rabbit serum (Dako) was used as a negative control. All sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin solution. The percentage of stained tumor cells in each section was determined independently by two observers. Menin expression was negative when no staining was detectable, and positive when staining was clearly detectable.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed using unpaired Student’s t-test with one-way analysis of variance for in vitro study and Kaplan–Meier method for clinical study. The data are expressed as means ± SE for in vitro study, and statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.
Results
Menin expression in breast cancer cells
To examine the expression of menin in breast cancer cells, immunohistochemical analysis using an anti-menin antibody was used to localize menin in the tissue samples. The results (Fig. 1a) showed strong immunostaining for menin in the breast cancer cells (left panel). The use of nonspecific IgG failed to show staining in the cells (right panel). Together, these findings show that menin is abundantly expressed in human breast cancer cells but not in the adjacent normal tissue.
Colocalization of menin and ER on breast cancer cells
To confirm the colocalization of menin and ERα on breast cancer cells, immunofluorescence analysis using a confocal laser-scanning microscope was performed. Merged images of immunofluorescence showed yellow coloration, suggesting the nuclear colocalization of the menin protein, and ERα was observed in a part of breast cancer cells (Fig. 1b).
Effect of menin on ERE activity
Several lines of evidence suggested that menin is a nuclear protein and thus may affect the transcriptional activity of selected genes [20, 38]. A recent report indicated that menin is linked to estrogen receptor activation [39]. To study the biological role of menin in ER activation, we used ERα-positive breast cancer cells, namely, MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 cells were cotransfected with either a vector that overexpressed menin or an empty vector together with the reporter plasmid ptk-ERE-Luc, which possesses a perfect palindromic ERE in the front of the thymidine kinase (tk) promoter. The results (Fig. 2a) showed that the expression of menin significantly increased the luciferase activity. We have previously identified a point mutation (569 delC) in menin isolated from a Japanese patient with MEN1; this mutation caused truncation of menin (from amino acid 183–610) [40]. When MCF-7 cells were cotransfected with a vector containing mutant menin together with ptk-ERE-Luc, the luciferase activity was not affected by the expression of mutant menin (Fig. 2b). To determine whether ERα function is modulated by menin, we carried out a transient transfection experiment using ERα-null COS-7 cells. The reporter plasmid ptk-ERE-Luc and the ERα expression plasmid pCER were cotransfected into COS-7 cells with or without the menin expression vector. The results (Fig. 2c) showed that transfection of the menin expression vector enhanced ERE-luciferase activity. In COS-7 cells without transfection of the ERα expression vector, the transfection of the menin expression vector had no effect on ERE-luciferase activity (data not shown).
Menin enhances ERα function with estrogen
Next, we tested whether ERα might affect the menin-induced ERE-luciferase activity. MCF-7 cells were treated with a specific or scrambled ERα siRNA and then transfected with the menin and ERE-luciferase reporter genes. Our results showed that the ERE-luciferase activity increased in the cells treated with the scrambled ERα siRNA and transfected with the menin expression vector (Fig. 3a), while the ERE-luciferase activity was markedly reduced in the cells treated with the ERα-specific siRNA (Fig. 3a). These findings suggest that the menin-mediated induction of the ERE-luciferase activity requires ERα. To address the role of estrogen in menin-stimulated ERE-luciferase activity, we seeded MCF-7 cells in the medium with charcoal-stripped FBS and then cotransfected with the menin and ERE-luciferase reporter genes in the absence or presence of E2. As shown in Fig. 3b, the expression of menin significantly increased the luciferase activity in the presence of E2 but not in its absence. These findings suggest that the menin-stimulated ERE-luciferase activity was estrogen dependent.
Menin activates AF-2 transcriptional activity of ERα
To determine whether ERα interacts directly with menin, protein–protein interaction of ERα and menin in vitro was performed by GST pull-down assay. As shown in Fig. 4a, the in vitro translated menin protein but not mutant menin interacted specifically with ERα. This result indicates that ERα and menin can interact directly with each other. To examine whether menin physically interacts with ERα, we evaluated the interaction in vivo by performing a mammalian two-hybrid assay. ERα has two distinct transactivation domains, namely, AF-1 and AF-2, which mediate ligand-dependent transactivation. The full-length ERα (1–596), AF-1 (1–180), AF-2 (302–553), and DBD (1–163) were each fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. Cotransfection of the reporter plasmid tk-GALpx3-Luc along with expression vectors for each ER domain and VP16-menin chimeras was performed in COS-7 cells. As shown in Fig. 4b, the expression of full-length ERα increased menin-mediated luciferase activity by approximately threefold. The expression of AF-1 or DBD did not increase menin-mediated luciferase expression, but AF-2 enhanced menin-mediated luciferase expression by approximately twofold. Therefore, menin potentiated ERα transcriptional activity through its AF-2 domain.
Tamoxifen inhibits the binding of menin to the AF-2 domain of ERα
To investigate the clinical role of menin in ERα activation, we used tamoxifen. Tamoxifen is an antiestrogen drug used extensively for adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. A previous report indicated that tamoxifen inhibits AF-2 but not AF-1 [41]. The reporter plasmid ptk-ERE-Luc and ERα expression plasmid pCER were cotransfected into MCF-7 cells with or without the menin expression vector. The results (Fig. 5a) showed that transfection of the menin expression vector enhanced ERE-luciferase activity. The cells transfected with the reporter gene and tamoxifen have been incubated more than 24 h (Fig. 5a) compared to the cells in Fig. 4b. Tamoxifen attenuated the effect of menin on ERE-luciferase activation. Furthermore, tamoxifen inhibited the binding of menin to AF-2 in mammalian two-hybrid assay (Fig. 5b). These results indicate that menin bound to the AF-2 domain of ERα might compete with tamoxifen in breast cancer cells.
Clinical study
The clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. None of lymph node status, tumor size, stage, and histological grade has shown significant correlation with menin expression. Correlation of each of age and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression with menin expression was significant (P = 0.048 and 0.037, respectively). When the cut-off value was 50%, 9 out of 20 menin-positive patients underwent local or distant recurrence, while only 4 out of 46 menin-negative cases recurred after treated with tamoxifen (P = 0.0025). As shown in Fig. 6, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that menin-negative group had more favorable disease-free survival than menin-positive group by Logrank test (P < 0.001).
Discussion
In the present study, we showed that the transcriptional factor menin physically interacts with ERα, leading to increased levels of estrogen-dependent transcription. The biological significance of this finding is that menin functions as a direct coactivator of estrogen.
Numerous studies have shown a crucial role of menin in regulating gene transcription. For instance, menin interacts with a number of transcriptional factors such as JunD, NF-κB, Smad3, and homeobox-containing DNA-binding protein Pem [17] and inhibits the activities of JunD and NF-κb [25, 26]. Ectopic expression of menin inhibits promoter activity of the prolactin and insulin genes in pituitary tumor cells or insulinoma cells, respectively [20, 38]. Menin regulates gene transcription at least in part by modulating chromatin structure. Menin has been shown to associate with a protein complex containing Drosophila trithorax-like histone lysine methyltransferases, the MLL gene products, namely, MLL and MLL2, both of which are SET domain-containing methyltransferases [28, 29]. This complex contains multiple proteins that are homologous to the members of the yeast SET1 complex (COMPASS) and three mammalian SET1-like complexes, including the activating signal cointegrator 2 complex (ASCOM), the HCF-1 complex, and the MLL complex [28], which were previously found to methylate histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and activate gene transcription. The menin-interacting complex isolated from mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) also methylates H3K4 in vitro [28]. These results support a model that menin recruits histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and thus upregulates gene transcription. A recent report showed that menin is a transcriptional coactivator of the nuclear receptors for estrogen and vitamin D (VD). Activation of the endogenous estrogen-responsive TFF1 (pS2) gene results in promoter recruitment of menin and in elevated trimethylation of H3K4. Knockdown of menin reduces both activated TFF1 (pS2) transcription and H3K4 trimethylation [39]. In the present study, we also showed that menin functions as a direct coactivator of ERα.
The MEN1 syndrome is diverse in its clinical manifestations; furthermore, nuclear receptors perform many functions in the affected organs in MEN1 patients. For example, elevated levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) are very common in these patients [30, 40]. In the normal situation, activation of VD receptor (VDR) will inhibit the production and release of PTH. Menin is a regulator of ER and VDR function, and inactivation of menin leads to the disruption of ER-mediated transcription [39]. Prolactinomas are also a common manifestation of MEN1 [38]. ERα has a direct effect on prolactin production in the pituitary gland and is expressed in pituitary adenomas [42].
Several lines of evidence revealed that coregulatory proteins, coactivators, and corepressors modulate the transactivation function of nuclear receptors via protein–protein interaction [43]. Among these coactivators, CBP-300/p300 [44], AIB1 [45], and MDM2 [32] were found to interact with ERα, resulting in an enhanced estrogen-dependent transcription activity. In our mammalian two-hybrid assay, ERα interacted with the menin protein (Fig. 4b). The pull-down assay using GST-ERα with the in vitro translated menin protein showed the capability of their interaction (Fig. 4a). This result is consistent with a recent report in which an almost identical pull-down assay was performed [39]. Our experiments could not clarify whether the interaction between ERα and menin in the living cells is ligand dependent or independent because both in vivo and in vitro assays used the exogenously expressed chimera proteins in poor physiological condition. However, at least, the presence of E2 seems to be a more preferable condition for their interaction. Moreover, the ERE-luciferase reporter assay in COS-7 cells showed that menin enhanced the ligand-dependent transcriptional activity of ERα but did not affect the ligand-independent one (Fig. 2c). This observation is consistent with the finding that the AF-2 domain of ERα, the component for ligand-binding and ligand-dependent activation, is responsible for the interaction with menin (Fig. 4b). All these findings indicate that the interaction between ERα and menin must be important for the biology of breast cancer cells when they respond to E2 for growth.
Transcriptional activation by ERα is mediated by two distinct activation domains, namely, the constitutively active AF-1 located in the N terminus of the receptor and the ligand-activated AF-2 located in the C terminus. AF-1 activity is usually weaker than AF-2 activity, but the two activation domains function synergistically in ERα. A large number of proteins have been identified recently that interact with and regulate the transcriptional activity of ERα by modifying the activity of the ligand-inducible activation domain AF-2 [46–48]. These proteins are believed to facilitate transcription by remodeling chromatin structure and stabilizing the transcription preinitiation apparatus at target genes [49, 50]. Tamoxifen is a selective estrogen receptor modulator used clinically to treat ER-positive breast cancers. Among the corepressors reported to affect tamoxifen action, only one has been suggested to show ERα and tamoxifen specificity [51]. This corepressor, termed RTA, was shown to interact with the N-terminal domain of ERs. With regard to coactivators, in addition to the p160 coactivators, one coactivator that affects tamoxifen activity has been reported, but there is no information on ERα or tamoxifen specificity of this coactivator [52]. In the present study, we demonstrated that menin can bind to AF-2, and tamoxifen inhibits the binding of menin to ERα, but tamoxifen suppressed ERE-luciferase activity only to the levels of nontreated wild-type MCF-7 in menin-overexpressing clones. Antiestrogen therapy with tamoxifen is often initially efficient, but eventually, most tumors become refractory to the antiestrogen treatment. On the basis of the results of this study, it can be hypothesized that the expression of menin in breast cancer cells might be associated with resistance to the antiestrogen therapy; however, a large number of clinical studies will be required to confirm this hypothesis.
The discovery of a second ER form and its therapeutic implications sparked great interest. Both the original ERα and the more recently identified ERβ subtypes bind and respond similarly to many physiological and pharmacological ligands. The current published data on tumors and patient profiles show that the majority of ER-positive breast tumors contain both ERα and ERβ and that a small population of tumors contains only ERβ [53]. Several studies suggest that ERβ modifies the responses of ERα in breast cancer cells and is generally antiproliferative. This may be because ERβ is less active transcriptionally and constrains ERα activity through heterodimers and/or because the heterodimers or ERβ homodimers may have distinct beneficial activities [53]. In this study, we showed that menin can function as a transcriptional regulator of ERα, further investigations will be needed to determine the role of menin on the activity of ERβ.
On the basis of the results of this study, we further performed menin immunohistochemistry on 65 ER-positive breast cancer samples, all of which had been treated with tamoxifen for 2–5 years. As shown in Fig. 6, menin-positive tumors had a worse clinical outcome than tumors that were menin negative. Recently, Hortado et al. reported that the paired box 2 gene product (PAX2) might be a predictive factor for tamoxifen. PAX2 was reported to bind to HER2 gene and repress HER2 expression at transcriptional levels, resulting in up-regulation of tamoxifen responses, when PAX2 formed a tertiary complex with estrogen receptor and estrogen or tamoxifen [54]. In our clinical study, HER2 expression of menin-positive tumors was significantly higher than that of menin-negative tumors, suggesting the possibility that the induction of tamoxifen resistance by menin might come from the interaction with PAX2, considering from the higher expression of HER2 in menin-positive tumors.
It is well recognized now that cleavage of the basement membrane and the extracellular matrix (ECM) by cancer cell proteinases is a prerequisite for malignant cells to invade tissues and spread through the body [55]. Matrix metalloproteinases play a highly significant and proven role in these processes [56, 57]. Recent report indicated that ERα can be implicated with signaling pathways and therefore induce cell proliferation and affect the expression of ECM molecules [58]. The effects of estrogen linked to the menin-mediated ERα activation on the expression of ECM molecules deserve further investigations.
In summary, our findings show that menin can function as a transcriptional regulator of ERα. Menin activates ERα activity by binding to the AF-2 domain of ERα; furthermore, because tamoxifen insufficiently inhibits menin-mediated ERα activation, menin is a possible predictive factor of tamoxifen therapy. Furthermore, our clinical study showed that menin-positive tumors had a worse outcome than menin-negative ones. Taken together, menin can function as a predictive factor for tamoxifen resistance.
References
Ciocca DR, Fanelli MA (1997) Estrogen receptors and cell proliferation in breast cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab 8:313–821
Govind AP, Thampan RV (2001) Proteins interacting with the mammalian estrogen receptor: proposal for an integrated model for estrogen receptor mediated regulation of transcription. J Cell Biochem 80:571–579
Fishman J, Osborne MP, Telang NT (1995) The role of estrogen in mammary carcinogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 768:91–100
Davidson NE (2000) Combined endocrine therapy for breast cancer—new life for an old idea? J Natl Cancer Inst 92:859–860
Hortobagyi GN (1998) Treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 339:974–984
Chen JD, Evans RM (1995) A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors. Nature 377:454–457
Heery DM, Kalkhoven E, Hoare S, Parker MG (1997) A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors. Nature 387:733–736
Heinzel T, Lavinsky RM, Mullen TM, Söderstrom M, Laherty CD, Torchia J, Yang WM, Brard G, Ngo SD, Davie JR, Seto E, Eisenman RN, Rose DW, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG (1997) A complex containing N-CoR, mSin3 and histone deacetylase mediates transcriptional repression. Nature 387:43–48
McKenna NJ, Lanz RB, O’Malley BW (1999) Nuclear receptor coregulators: cellular and molecular biology. Endocr Rev 2:321–344
Nagy L, Kao HY, Chakravarti D, Lin RJ, Hassig CA, Ayer DE, Schreiber SL, Evans RM (1997) Nuclear receptor repression mediated by a complex containing SMRT, mSin3A, and histone deacetylase. Cell 89:373–380
Chen H, Lin RJ, Schiltz RL, Chakravarti D, Nash A, Nagy L, Privalsky ML, Nakatani Y, Evans RM (1997) Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300. Cell 90:569–580
McMahon C, Suthiphongchai T, DiRenzo J, Ewen ME (1999) P/CAF associates with cyclin D1 and potentiates its activation of the estrogen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5383–5387
Lemmens I, Van de Ven WJ, Kas K, Zhang CX, Giraud S, Wautot V, Buisson N, De Witte K, Salandre J, Lenoir G, Pugeat M, Calender A, Parente F, Quincey D, Gaudray P, De Wit MJ, Lips CJ, Höppener JW, Khodaei S, Grant AL, Weber G, Kytölä S, Teh BT, Farnebo F, Phelan C, Hayward N, Larsson N, Pannett AAJ, Forbes SA, Bassett JHD, Thakker RV (1997) Identification of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene. Hum Mol Genet 6:1177–1183
Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P, Olufemi SE, Collins FS, Emmert-Buck MR, Debelenko LV, Zhuang Z, Lubensky IA, Liotta LA, Crabtree JS, Wang Y, Roe BA, Weisemann J, Boguski MS, Agarwal SK, Kester MB, Kim YS, Heppner C, Dong Q, Spiegel AM, Burns AL, Marx SJ (1997) Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science 276:404–407
Sheppherd JJ (1991) The natural history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Highly uncommon or highly unrecognized? Arch Surg 126:935–952
Trump D, Farren B, Wooding C, Pang JT, Besser GM, Buchanan KD, Edwards CR, Heath DA, Jackson CE, Jansen S, Lips K, Monson JP, O’Halloran D, Sampson J, Shalet SM, Wheeler MH, Zink A, Thakker RV (1996) Clinical studies of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Q J Med 89:653–659
Poisson A, Zablewska B, Gaudray P (2003) Menin interacting proteins as clues toward the understanding of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Cancer Lett 189:1–10
Chandrasekharappa SC, Teh BT (2003) Functional studies of the MEN1 gene. J Intern Med 253:606–615
Agarwal SK, Kennedy PA, Scacheri PC, Novotny EA, Hickman AB, Cerrato A, Rice TS, Moore JB, Rao S, Ji Y, Mateo C, Libutti SK, Oliver B, Chandrasekharappa SC, Burns AL, Collins FS, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ (2005) Menin molecular interactions: insights into normal functions and tumorigenesis. Horm Metab Res 37:369–374
Sayo Y, Murao K, Imachi H, Cao WM, Sato M, Dobashi H, Wong NC, Ishida T (2002) The multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene product, menin, inhibits insulin production in rat insulinoma cells. Endocrinology 143:2437–2440
Schnepp RW, Mao H, Sykes SM, Zong WX, Silva A, La P, Hua X (2004) Menin induces apoptosis in murine embryonic fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 279:10685–10691
Busygina V, Suphapeetiporn K, Marek LR, Stowers RS, Xu T, Bale AE (2004) Hypermutability in a Drosophila model for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Hum Mol Genet 13:2399–2408
Jin S, Mao H, Schnepp RW, Sykes SM, Silva AC, D’Andrea AD, Hua X (2003) Menin associates with FANCD2, a protein involved in repair of DNA damage. Cancer Res 63:4204–4210
Scappaticci S, Maraschio P, del Ciotto N, Fossati GS, Zonta A, Fraccaro M (1991) Chromosome abnormalities in lymphocytes and fibroblasts of subjects with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 52:85–92
Agarwal SK, Guru SC, Heppner C, Erdos MR, Collins RM, Park SY, Saggar S, Chandrasekharappa SC, Collins FS, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ, Burns AL (1999) Menin interacts with the AP1 transcription factor JunD and represses JunD-activated transcription. Cell 96:143–152
Heppner C, Bilimoria KY, Agarwal SK, Kester M, Whitty LJ, Guru SC, Chandrasekharappa SC, Collins FS, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ, Burns AL (2001) The tumor suppressor protein menin interacts with NF-kappaB proteins and inhibits NF-kappaB-mediated transactivation. Oncogene 20:4917–4925
Lin S, Elledge SJ (2003) Multiple tumor suppressor pathways negatively regulate telomerase. Cell 113:881–889
Hughes CM, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Milne TA, Copeland TD, Levine SS, Lee JC, Hayes DN, Shanmugam KS, Bhattacharjee A, Biondi CA, Kay GF, Hayward NK, Hess JL, Meyerson M (2004) Menin associates with a trithorax family histone methyltransferase complex and with the hoxc8 locus. Mol Cell 13:587–597
Yokoyama A, Wang Z, Wysocka J, Sanyal M, Aufiero DJ, Kitabayashi I, Herr W, Cleary ML (2004) Leukemia proto-oncoprotein MLL forms a SET1-like histone methyltransferase complex with menin to regulate Hox gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 24:5639–5649
Bhuiyan MM, Sato M, Murao K, Imachi H, Namihira H, Takahara J (2000) Expression of menin in parathyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2615–2619
Bhuiyan MM, Sato M, Murao K, Imachi H, Namihira H, Ishida T, Takahara J, Miyauchi A (2001) Differential expression of menin in various adrenal tumors. The role of menin in adrenal tumors. Cancer 92:1393–1401
Saji S, Okumura N, Eguchi H, Nakashima S, Suzuki A, Toi M, Nozawa Y, Saji S, Hayashi S (2001) MDM2 enhances the function of estrogen receptor alpha in human breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 281:259–265
Sakamoto T, Eguchi H, Omoto Y, Ayabe T, Mori H, Hayashi S (2002) Estrogen receptor-mediated effects of tamoxifen on human endometrial cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 192:93–104
Murao K, Wada Y, Nakamura T, Taylor AH, Mooradian AD, Wong NC (1998) Effects of glucose and insulin on rat apolipoprotein A-I gene expression. J Biol Chem 273:18959–18965
Murao K, Terpstra V, Green SR, Kondratenko N, Steinberg D, Quehenberger O (1997) Characterization of CLA-1, a human homologue of rodent scavenger receptor BI, as a receptor for high density lipoprotein and apoptotic thymocytes. J Biol Chem 272:17551–17557
Hayashi S, Hajiro-Nakanishi K, Makino Y, Eguchi H, Yodoi J, Tanaka H (1997) Functional modulation of estrogen receptor by redox state with reference to thioredoxin as a mediator. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4035–4040
Murao K, Bassyouni H, Taylor AH, Wanke IE, Wong NC (1997) Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 inhibits activity of site A from the rat apolipoprotein A1 gene. Biochemistry 36:301–306
Namihira H, Sato M, Murao K, Cao WM, Matsubara S, Imachi H, Niimi M, Dobashi H, Wong NC, Ishida T (2002) The multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene product, menin, inhibits the human prolactin promoter activity. J Mol Endocrinol 29:297–304
Dreijerink KM, Mulder KW, Winkler GS, Höppener JW, Lips CJ, Timmers HT (2006) Menin links estrogen receptor activation to histone H3K4 trimethylation. Cancer Res 66:4929–4935
Sato M, Matsubara S, Miyauchi A, Ohye H, Imachi H, Murao K, Takahara J (1998) Identification of five novel germline mutations of the MEN1 gene in Japanese multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) families. J Med Genet 35:915–919
Berry M, Metzger D, Chambon P (1990) Role of the two activating domains of the oestrogen receptor in the cell-type and promoter-context dependent agonistic activity of the anti-oestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen. EMBO J 9:2811–2818
Shupnik MA, Pitt LK, Soh AY, Anderson A, Lopes MB, Laws ER Jr (1998) Selective expression of estrogen receptor alpha and beta isoforms in human pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3965–3972
Glass CK, Rose DW, Rosenfeld MG (1997) Nuclear receptor coactivators. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9:222–232
McInerney EM, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW, Katzenellenbogen BS (1996) Analysis of estrogen receptor transcriptional enhancement by a nuclear hormone receptor coactivator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10069–10073
Anzick SL, Kononen J, Walker RL, Azorsa DO, Tanner MM, Guan XY, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP, Trent JM, Meltzer PS (1997) AIB1, a steroid receptor coactivator amplified in breast and ovarian cancer. Science 277:965–968
Katzenellenbogen BS, Katzenellenbogen JA (2002) Biomedicine. Defining the “S” in SERMs. Science 295:2380–2381
Katzenellenbogen JA, O’Malley BW, Katzenellenbogen BS (1996) Tripartite steroid hormone receptor pharmacology: interaction with multiple effector sites as a basis for the cell- and promoter-specific action of these hormones. Mol Endocrinol 10:119–131
Lavinsky RM, Jepsen K, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Mullen TM, Schiff R, Del-Rio AL, Ricote M, Ngo S, Gemsch J, Hilsenbeck SG, Osborne CK, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG, Rose DW (1998) Diverse signaling pathways modulate nuclear receptor recruitment of N-CoR and SMRT complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2920–2925
Métivier R, Stark A, Flouriot G, Hübner MR, Brand H, Penot G, Manu D, Denger S, Reid G, Kos M, Russell RB, Kah O, Pakdel F, Gannon F (2002) A dynamic structural model for estrogen receptor-alpha activation by ligands, emphasizing the role of interactions between distant A and E domains. Mol Cell 10:1019–1032
Nilsson S, Mäkelä S, Treuter E, Tujague M, Thomsen J, Andersson G, Enmark E, Pettersson K, Warner M, Gustafsson JA (2001) Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol Rev 81:1535–1565
Norris JD, Fan D, Sherk A, McDonnell DP (2002) A negative coregulator for the human ER. Mol Endocrinol 16:459–468
Jackson TA, Richer JK, Bain DL, Takimoto GS, Tung L, Horwitz KB (1997) The partial agonist activity of antagonist-occupied steroid receptors is controlled by a novel hinge domain-binding coactivator L7/SPA and the corepressors N-CoR or SMRT. Mol Endocrinol 11:693–705
Fox EM, Davis RJ, Shupnik MA (2008) ERbeta in breast cancer—onlooker, passive player, or active protector? Steroids 73:1039–1051
Hurtado A, Holmes KA, Geistlinger TR, Hutcheson IR, Nicholson RI, Brown M, Jiang J, Howat WJ, Ali S, Carroll J (2008) Regulation of ERBB2 by oestrogen receptor-PAX2 determines response to tamoxifen. Nature 456:663–667
Friedl P, Wolf K (2008) Tube travel: the role of proteases in individual and collective cancer cell invasion. Cancer Res 68:7247–7249
Egeblad M, Werb Z (2002) New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2:161–174
Itoh Y (2006) MT1-MMP: a key regulator of cell migration in tissue. IUBMB Life 58:589–596
Kousidou OCh, Berdiaki A, Kletsas D, Zafiropoulos A, Theocharis AD, Tzanakakis GN, Karamanos NK (2008) Estradiol-estrogen receptor: a key interplay of the expression of syndecan-2 and metalloproteinase-9 in breast cancer cells. Mol Oncol 2:223–232
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imachi, H., Murao, K., Dobashi, H. et al. Menin, a product of the MENI gene, binds to estrogen receptor to enhance its activity in breast cancer cells: possibility of a novel predictive factor for tamoxifen resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122, 395–407 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0581-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0581-0