Abstract
Coptotermes formosanus, known in its native China as the ‘House White Ant’, was introduced to the southeast USA likely in the 1950s, where it is known as the Formosan subterranean termite. In the USA it is best known as a pest of buildings in urban areas, however C. formosanus also attacks live trees along streets and in urban parks, suggesting it may be able to invade forests in the USA. A survey of 113 forest patches around Charleston South Carolina and New Orleans Louisiana, where C. formosanus was first recorded, found that 37% and 52%, respectively, were infested. Resistograph measurement of internal hollows in tree trunks in forest patches infested with C. formosanus found infested sites contained more and larger hollows compared with non-infested sites. Compared with forest patches free of C. formosanus, infested patches had 32% more trees with hollows in Charleston, and 115% more in New Orleans. Similarly, compared with patches free of C. formosanus, hollows were 2–3 times larger in infested patches in Charleston, and 2–6 times larger in New Orleans. Quercus (oak) and Acer (maple) were the most damaged trees in Charleston, whereas Carya (bitternut hickory), Taxodium (bald cypress), Nyssa (blackgum) and Liquidamber (sweetgum) were the most damaged in New Orleans. As termite damaged trees are more likely to die, these differing damage levels between tree species suggests that C. formosanus may alter community structure in US forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coptotermes formosanus is the most common termite in urban areas in its native China and Taiwan; it dominates urban areas so completely it is known as Jiā báiyǐ or the ‘house white ant’ (Wang et al. 2002; Zhung and Liu 2003). It is an invasive species, established in Japan, Marshall and Midway Islands, Hawaii and the continental USA (Evans et al. 2013). The termite likely arrived in several ports of the southeastern USA post World War 2, certainly by the 1950s (Beal 1987; Chambers et al. 1988). In the following 60 years, C. formosanus, known in the USA as the ‘Formosan subterranean termite’ or FST, has spread to over 120 urban areas in 10 southeastern states, having spread primarily through movement of infested wood, especially recycled railway ties/sleepers, but also potted plants and furniture (Atkinson et al. 1993; Messenger et al. 2002; Jenkins et al. 2002; Lee et al. 2009; for review see Evans et al. 2013).
Almost all field research on C. formosanus in China, Japan and the USA has occurred in urban areas, and focussed on pest control, especially in buildings and other human constructions (e.g. Wang et al. 2002; Zhung and Liu 2003; Lax and Osbrink 2003; Guillot et al. 2010). There were early observations in the USA that this species can infest and consume the heart wood of live trees in urban areas (Lai et al. 1983; Beal 1987; La Fage 1987; Henderson and Forschler 1996), however the focus on buildings meant the threat to urban trees planted along streets or parks did not receive attention until later (Osbrink et al. 1999; Mankin et al. 2002; Osbrink and Lax 2002, 2003; Messenger et al. 2005).
The infestation and consumption of living trees suggests that C. formosanus may be able to spread from urban areas and invade forests. In Japan, C. formosanus are found in forests in the southern islands (Mori 1987; Abe and Watanabe 1981; Yasuda et al. 2000; Iwata and Kodama 2007) and are used for field testing of wood preservatives (e.g. Tascioglu et al. 2013). The congeneric Southeast Asian species C. gestroi was observed attacking and hollowing living rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis, native to South America) in Malaysia over one century ago (Bailey 1901; Ridley 1909), prompting the belief that native trees in natural forests were immune to termite attack. This belief changed with better survey methods (e.g. Harris 1966a, b; Roy-Noël 1966; Tho 1982). It is now understood that Coptotermes species native to Africa, South America, Asia and Australia have evolved to feed on and nest inside living trees, in both plantations and natural forests (for a review see Cowie et al. 1989; also Bandeira 1993; Apolinárioa and Martius 2004; Werner and Prior 2007; Jasmi and Ahmad 2011; Lee et al. 2015, 2017). Indeed, the common name for Coptotermes in Australia is ‘tree-piping termite’ (Andersen and Jacklyn 1993).
There is evidence that C. formosanus appears to be spreading naturally from urban areas into surrounding forested lands in the USA. Two other studies from Mississippi found alates (the winged reproductive termites) in non-urban habitats, including forests, sometimes in higher numbers than in rural areas (Sun et al. 2007; Lax and Wiltz 2010). Although suggestive, there are two potential sources for bias in those methods. First was the use of light traps. Light traps attract flying adult termites, and a light trap in dark forest may attract more alates from further away than a light trap in an urban setting (Bowden 1982; Muirhead-Thompson 1991; Yela and Holyoak 1997). Second was the proximity of human activity. The light traps in ‘forested locations’ were sometimes close to human constructions, highways, or railways (Sun et al. 2007; Lax and Wiltz 2010), therefore human transport also may account for collecting C. formosanus. In addition to alates, Little et al. (2014) also surveyed for foraging worker and soldier termites in more than 7000 stumps in 11 clear-cut pine plantations. They only found native Reticulitermes species in 5% of the stumps, perhaps indicating the difficulty of finding C. formosanus in locales with low densities.
If C. formosanus is spreading into forests, it may affect tree species composition. In laboratory testing of commercial lumber samples, C. formosanus preferred to eat birch, pine, maple, and oak over sassafras, cypress and cedar (Morales-Ramos and Rojas 2001). Surveys of trees along streets and parks suggest similar patterns (La Fage 1987; Osbrink et al. 1999). Attack by various Coptotermes species reduced growth, fecundity and survival of trees in many countries (Gray and Buchter 1969; Speight and Wylie 2001; Werner and Prior 2007; Werner et al. 2008; Zorzenon and Campos 2015). If these results from laboratory tests are indicative, and if US trees respond similarly, then C. formosanus may change forest communities in the USA.
We aimed to determine: whether C. formosanus had invaded natural forest communities in the southeastern USA. If so, then we aimed to measure the level of damage to standing trees in forests, and to determine whether C. formosanus had a feeding preference based on damage level. We surveyed forested areas in and on the periphery of Charleston South Carolina and New Orleans Louisiana because these are among the oldest known urban infestations in the continental USA, and populations of C. formosanus and tree infestations appear to be particularly high in New Orleans (King and Spink 1969; Chambers et al. 1988; Osbrink and Lax 2002; Messenger et al. 2005). We chose forested areas, patches, 10 km or less from urban areas as potentially infested and > 50 km as potentially clear patches, because the natural rate of spread of termites is slow, limited by weak alate dispersal (around 0.2–1 km; Messenger and Mullins 2005; Shelton et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2007; Connétable et al. 2012; Mullins et al. 2015), and perhaps 4–8 years until incipient colonies mature and produce alates (Thorne et al. 2002; Grube and Forschler 2004); values used in models of termite spread (Cameron et al. 2008; Tonini et al. 2013; Hochmair et al. 2013; Suppo et al. 2018).
Methods
Resistograph
The Resistograph is an instrument used to determine rot and hollows in wood, such as wooden poles and trees. The physical resistance to drilling is measured, using a 150 mm long × 2 mm diameter bit rotating at 1000 rpm, which correlates to the density of the wood, and is accurate enough to detect tree rings (Rinn et al. 1996; Mattheck et al. 1997). Detection of hollows and wood rot was indicated by zero resistance for hollows or lower density, and less resistance, for rotted wood, respectively. Researchers, managers of utility poles and foresters use Resistographs routinely to determine the status of wood (Moore 1999; Isik and Li 2003; for reviews see Johnstone et al. 2013; Gao et al. 2017). The Resistograph was used to find hollows in three species of urban trees infested by C. formosansus in New Orleans, demonstrating the utility of the instrument for investigating termite infestations (Osbrink and Lax 2002).
Study locations
We identified forested sites termed locales (9 in Charlestown and 8 in New Orleans) within 100 km from each city centre, using local maps and Google Earth, and surveyed 71 and 113 forest patches within locales for each city, respectively (Table 1). We choose forest patches greater than five hectares with a lower level of human disturbance, as determined by: no internal roads, presence of large native trees, and local knowledge of managing authorities (Table 1). We conducted a standardised search in two stages at each forest patch. In the first search stage we walked a 200 m × 2 m transect located approximately in the centre of the patch and examined all standing and fallen dead timber (usually stumps and logs) for C. formosanus, including visual search and a microwave detection device, Termatrac® (Evans 2002a). We cut into stumps and logs with axes to search for live termites or hollows caused by their feeding. We rolled logs so that the soil and the underside of the log was exposed, to search for live termites or their tunnels. The second search stage occurred when we found C. formosanus. We searched a circular area, 30 m radius, from any C. formosanus infested stump or log for additional infestations (King and Spink 1969; Evans 2002b). We categorised forest patches with no C. formosanus as ‘clear’, and those with at least four infestations as ‘infested’; forest patches with one to three infestations were not used. We searched a total of 184 forest patches around Charleston SC and New Orleans LA, of which 113 were retained for the study (Table 1).
Tree trunk data
We collected data on possible C. formosanus infestation of live trees in the forest patches designated clear and infested. We placed new transects (100 m × 2 m) at least 5 m apart so they did not overlap and identified all trees along those transects, then measured each for hollows using a Resistograph (F-series, IML-Instrumenta Mechanic Labor GmbH, 1275 Shiloh Road, Ste. 2780–30144 Kennesaw, GA, USA). We drilled tree trunks two to four times, between 30 and 120 cm above ground level. The instrument recorded a graphical trace of wood resistance against linear depth, from which we extracted four metrics. (1) number of hollows (number of separate instances of resistance at zero), (2) length of ‘sound’ wood (length of trace at maximum resistance), (3) length of ‘hollows’ (length of trace at zero), and (4) length of ‘weak’ wood (length of trace between maximum resistance and zero). We recorded measurements on 370 trees (Table 2). We converted the lengths of hollows and weak wood to proportions of total trace to control for variable drilling length (min = 79 mm, max = 150 mm, average = 139 mm).
Analysis
Clear and infested forest patches thus become two treatments in a ‘natural experiment’. We compared the number and size of hollows between forest patches infested with C. formosanus to those that were clear of the termite. We were not able to attribute all hollows or soft wood found in tree trunks to C. formosanus, however any increase in hollows was interpreted as due their presence. We compared the frequency of infestation of forest patches between Charleston and New Orleans in two ways, first with a t test using forest patches as replicates within locales, considering that C. formosanus distribution may be clumped due to human factors, and second with a Fisher’s exact test ignoring locales. We analysed tree species data for each city separately, because species composition differed between cities (Table 2). We analysed resistograph metrics (number of hollows, proportion of weak wood and proportion of hollows) with generalised linear models (GLM) with three factors: (1) presence of C. formosanus, (2) city, (3) tree species, but only trees found in both cities using post hoc pairwise comparisons tested by LSD. We square-root/arcsin-transformed length proportions to improve homogeneity of variance assumptions.
Results
We searched 71 patches in nine locales around Charleston; of these, 26 patches (37%) were found to be infested. Within locales, the percentage of patches with C. formosanus ranged from 0 to 100%; five of the nine locales had less than 50% infestation of patches. We searched 113 patches in eight locales around the New Orleans region; of these 48 patches (42%) were found to be infested. Within locales, the percentage of patches with C. formosanus ranged from 0 to 100% with only three of nine locales in New Orleans having less than 50% infestation while infested locales in Charlestown provided 5 of 9 with less than 50% infestation (Table 1). The average infestation rate of forest patches within locales in Charleston (34.5 ± 14.5%) was not was significantly different from those in New Orleans (52.6 ± 14.4%; t15 = 0.889, p = 0.388). Also, the infestation of patches considered without locales did not differ between the two regions (Fisher’s exact p = 0.118).
We drilled 176 trees with the Resistograph in Charleston. In clear forest patches, 67% of the trees had hollows (44 hollow trees of 66 total trees), compared with infested forest patches, where 80% of the trees had hollows (88 of 110 total trees), which was a significant difference (χ2 = 5.021, df = 1, p = 0.025). We drilled 194 trees with the Resistograph in New Orleans. In clear forest patches, 27% of the trees had hollows (23 of 86 total trees), compared with infested patches where 55% had hollows (60 of 108 total trees), which was a significant difference (χ2 = 16.235, df = 1, p < 0.001). Trees in Charleston had more hollows than those in New Orleans, in clear patches (χ2 = 23.185, df = 1, p < 0.001) and infested patches (χ2 = 16.858, df = 1, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1). The hollows in Charleston were frequently small (1–2 mm), near the surface, and may not represent termite attack.
The number of internal hollows in drilled trees, among tree genera found in both cities, differed significantly with termite presence, with more hollows per tree in C. formosanus infested forest patches compared with clear patches (F1,822 = 16.192, p < 0.001). There was no difference between regions (F1,282 = 1.998, p = 0.159), but there were significant differences between tree genera (F7,282 = 3.263, p = 0.002), there was an interaction between region and tree genera (F7,282 = 2.777, p = 0.008). This was because there were more hollows per tree in Celtis in Charleston compared with New Orleans, and more hollows per tree in Pinus in New Orleans than Charleston (Fig. 2).
The proportion of Resistograph traces that were not solid wood by tree genera found in both cities differed significantly with termite presence, with more hollows in C. formosanus infested forest patches (F1,288 = 16.283, p < 0.001), and more weak wood as well (F1,288 = 5.340, p = 0.022). The proportion of traces did not differ significantly between cities for hollows (F1,288 = 0.322, p = 0.571), but did for weak wood, with more in Charleston than New Orleans (F1,288 = 73.516, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between tree genera for hollows (F7,288 = 1.027, p < 0.412), but there were for weak wood (F7,288 = 3.631, p = 0.001), with Celtis and Ulmus lower than other genera.
If the difference in proportion hollow in trees from clear and infested forest patches was due to C. formosanus, then relative differences between tree genera may indicate food preference. The change in proportion of the Resistograph trace that was hollow between clear and infested forest patches (i.e. clear – infested) varied among tree genera and city (Fig. 3). Two tree genera showed a decrease in both cities: Quercus (oak) and Carya (bitternut and pecan), the latter with a large decrease in New Orleans. Acer (maple) was the only genus that showed a decrease in the proportion of hollows between infested and clear patches in Charleston. There were six tree genera with decreases in New Orleans: Liquidambar (sweetgum), Nyssa (blackgum), Celtis (sugar hackberry), Ulmus (elm), Taxodium (Bald Cypress) and Salex (willow); note that the latter two genera were found only in New Orleans. Pinus (pine) did not show a marked change. The overall average difference in hollow size in infested forest patches in Charleston was 3.4 ± 2.1%, whereas for New Orleans it was 14.6 ± 3.0%.
Discussion
Coptotermes formosanus had a greater impact on forest patches around New Orleans than Charleston. This broad pattern was evident from four observations. First, about half of the forest patches in New Orleans were infested with C. formosanus, compared with about one-third in Charleston. Second, although more trees in Charleston had at least one hollow, the relative difference between clear and infested forest patches was greater in New Orleans. Third, although the number of hollows in trees was greater in Charleston, the relative difference between clear and infested forest patches was greater in New Orleans. Consideration of the second and third observations together suggests that many of the (mostly small, around 1 mm) hollows found in trees in Charleston were not due to C. formosanus. Fourth, the difference in the size of the hollows was greater in New Orleans than in Charleston.
The higher infestation rate and damage to trees in New Orleans compared with Charleston may be due to the warmer temperature and wetter climate of New Orleans relative to Charleston (New Orleans is about 3°S of Charleston, with average monthly maxima 1.2 °C warmer and minima 3.1 °C warmer, and 289 mm more annual rainfall) (climate data from NOAA). Alternatively, it may be due to a greater original influx of termites, believed to have come on naval vessels returning from action in East Asia (Beal 1987; Chambers et al. 1988).
The difference in size of hollows measured by the Resistograph trace between clear and infested forests suggested that C. formosanus was attacking trees differentially. Maples were relatively heavily eaten in Charleston, but were untouched in New Orleans, whereas Liquidamber, Nyssa, Celtis and Ulmus were more heavily attacked in New Orleans than Charleston. This may be due to the alternative food sources. There were many more Pinus in Charleston, which may be a less desirable food source than Liquidambar, which was also common in Charleston. Also, Celtis and Ulmus were rarer in Charleston. Oaks were attacked, but the relatively small hollows found in the trees in the forested patches was a surprise. The data from oaks planted in urban areas, including streets and parks of New Orleans, suggested that oak may be particularly vulnerable (La Fage 1987; Osbrink et al. 1999). This may be due to the urban setting where tree density and diversity is much lower than in forests, therefore C. formosanus may have little choice but to eat what is available.
The data collected in the current study broadly match those from previous work. King and Spink (1969) and Beal (1987) reported C. formosanus attacked Taxodium (bald cypress) Pinus taeda (pine); Sapium sebiferum (Chinese tallow), and Myrica cerifera (wax myrtle bushes), in Lake Charles, ca. 300 km from New Orleans, although the infested area was reclaimed swamp, and thus does not represent natural habitat. Surveys of park and street trees have found extensive damage to oak and maple trees in Charleston, New Orleans and elsewhere in Louisiana (Chambers et al. 1988; Osbrink et al. 1999; Brown et al. 2007). Baldcypress was reported to be extensively damaged in parks in New Orleans (Osbrink and Lax 2002). There was one difference between the current field study from the laboratory study of Morales-Ramos and Rojas (2001): Taxodium (bald cypress) and Salex (willows) trees had the largest hollows in the field, but were not favoured in the laboratory. This may be due to the growing conditions because both genera live in flood-prone areas, and termites may become isolated in single trees during wetter times of the year (Henderson and Forschler 1996). The colony would be limited to a single food source, that tree, and therefore foraging effort would be focussed in that single tree, resulting in greater wood consumption.
Although range expansion from naturally dispersing winged termites is likely to be slow, human assisted range expansion has been rapid. In Louisiana and Texas C. formosanus spread to 30 counties over 40 years (Messenger et al. 2002; Howell et al. 2001; Brown et al. 2007), and in Florida and Mississippi to 40 counties over 20 years (Scheffrahn and Su 2005; Sun et al. 2007). This was due to humans moving infested wood, especially railway sleepers/crossties (Jenkins et al. 2002; Messenger et al. 2002). In comparison, the spread of C. formosanus in South Carolina appears to have been slower, taking 40 years to spread to three counties (Chambers et al. 1988; Benson et al. 2000). This may be due to differences in human transportation of infested timber, or differences in the genetic makeup of the C. formosanus population in Charleston, which is distinct from those elsewhere in the USA (Husseneder et al. 2012). Or it may be due to lower temperature, as mentioned above. In any case, it seems plausible that C. formosanus may spread into forested habitat from any infested urban location.
A few termite species are now known to have invaded natural forest habitats. For example, Reticulitermes flavipes (once named R. santonensis) from the USA has invaded forests in France, and Nasutitermes corniger from South America/Caribbean islands has invaded forests in New Guinea (See Evans et al. 2013 for review). Two invasive species of Coptotermes have spread into forests, however with different levels of success. C. formosanus has invaded forests in Japan (Abe and Watanabe 1981; Yasuda et al. 2000; Tascioglu et al. 2013), whereas C. gestroi has spread into forest margins in Taiwan (Chiu et al. 2016). The difference appears to be the presence of the fungus growing species, Odontotermes formosanus (Macrotermitidae) in Taiwan. In general, fungus growing termites form larger colonies (see Evans et al. 1998), and appear to be competitively dominant, and so exclude C. gestroi (Chiu et al. 2016). Japan lacks fungus growing species, and the most abundant wood eating species is Reticulitermes speratus. The situation is similar in the USA, with no fungus growing termites and several Reticulitermes species. Therefore, it appears likely that the spread of C. formosanus into US forests will more closely resemble the process in Japan than Taiwan.
There have been many other invasive insects that damage forested lands in the USA. There are over 450 species of exotic insects recorded in the USA since European settlement, 63 of these are considered serious pests estimated to cause around $3.8B damage (Aukema et al. 2010, 2011). Although C. formosanus was identified as one of the 450 species, it was not considered to have high impact in forests (Lovett et al. 2006; Aukema et al. 2010; Gandhi and Herm 2010) although costs in urban areas have been noted (Pimentel et al. 2005). Instead, the most important forest ‘poster pests’ include four species; Lymantria dispar (European Gypsy moth), which attacks numerous deciduous tree species yet favour oak (Tobin et al. 2012), Agrilus planipennis (Emerald ash borer) from east Asia, which prefers Fraxinus (Herms and McCullough 2014), Adelges tsugae (Hemlock woolly adelgid) from East Asia, which attacks hemlock and spruce trees (Orwig et al. 2002), and Anoplophora glabripennis (Asian longhorned beetle) from China which feeds mostly on maple (Hu et al. 2009). In addition to these transcontinental invaders, there are additional invaders from lower latitudes of North America moving northwards, including Dendroctonus frontalis (Southern pine beetle), and D. ponderosae (Mountain pine beetle), which attack pines (Evangelista et al. 2011; Birt and Coulson 2015).
There are several differences between the invasion of C. formosanus and the aforementioned forest insect pests. The first is diversity of food species. Most major forest insect pests target one or few closely related tree species, whereas C. formosanus can attack a wide diversity of trees from most families. Another difference is speed and ease of detection. The other insect pests attack leaves, bark or phloem producing obvious effects on tree health in the span of a single growing season, making for easier detection and monitoring compared to wood attacking, cryptic, underground-moving termites. In general, the other insects breed annually or faster, and fly further distances. Therefore, the effects of most forest insect pest are fast to appear, easy to observe and document. In contrast, the spread of C. formosanus into forests will be difficult to monitor and their impact on forest health difficult to predict.
Interpreting the results of this study need some caution because of the clumped distribution of termite colony impacts on the local landscape. First, there was large variation in infestation rates between forest patches within and between the two cities, so averages within and across cities may not prove meaningful for infested locales. Second, there was variation in forest patch community structure, with different types and quantities of tree genera between cities, and even between forest patches within cities. Nevertheless, these are the first data that show unequivocally that C. formosanus has infested forest patches, outside of urban areas, and that this East Asian termite may have preference for different trees in different regions of the USA. The current study extended the list of potentially vulnerable tree species, to hackberry, bitternut hickory, pecan and elm. The long-term effects of C. formosanus on tree communities in USA forests is yet to be definitively determined.
References
Abe T, Watanabe H (1981) Soil macrofauna in a subtropical rain forest and its adjacent cassava plantation in Okinawa; with special reference to the activity of termites. Physiol Ecol Jpn 20(2):101–114
Andersen AN, Jacklyn P (1993) Termites of the top end. CSIRO, Melbourne
Apolinárioa FE, Martius C (2004) Ecological role of termites (Insecta, Isoptera) in tree trunks in central Amazonian rain forests. Forest Ecol Manag 194:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.052
Atkinson TH, Rust MK, Smith JL (1993) The Formosan termite Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) established in California. Pan-Pac Entomol 69:111–113
Aukema JE, McCullough DG, Von Holle B, Liebhold AM, Britton K, Frankel SJ (2010) Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 60:886–897. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.11.5
Aukema JE, Leung B, Kovacs K, Chivers C, Britton KO, Englin J, Frankel SJ, Haight RG, Holmes FP, Liebhold AM, McCullough DG, Von Holle B (2011) Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States. PLoS ONE 6(9):e24587. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024587
Bailey WW (1901) Report on the attack of white or termites—‘Termes gestroi’ on para rubber trees. Agric Bull Straits Fed Malay States 1:27–29. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/148131#page/43/mode/1up. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
Bandeira AG (1993) Nota sobre Coptotermes (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae), praga em floresta nativa da Amazônia. Brasil Revta Bras Ent 37:189–191
Beal RH (1987) Introduction of Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki to the continental United States. In: Tamashiro M, Su NY (eds) Biology and control of the Formosan subterranean termite. Proceedings of the international symposium on the Formosan subterranean termite. University of Hawaii, Research Extension Series 083, pp 48–53
Benson EP, Hathorne K, Zungoli PA (2000) Entomology insect information series: termites of South Carolina. Clemson University, cooperative extension. https://hgic.clemson.edu/factsheet/termites-of-south-carolina/. Accessed 15 May 2018
Birt AG, Coulson RN (2015) Southern pine beetle herbivory in the southern United States: moving from external disturbance to internal process. In: Perera A, Sturtevant B, Buse L (eds) Simulation modeling of forest landscape disturbances. Springer, Cham, pp 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19809-5_7
Bowden J (1982) An analysis of factors affecting catches of insects in light-traps. Bull Ent Res 72:535–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300008579
Brown KS, Yokum BP, Riegel C, Carroll MK (2007) New parish records of Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Louisiana. Fla Entomol 90:570–572. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2007)90%5b570:NPROCF%5d2.0.CO;2
Cameron DA, Ivers DJ, Evans TA, Myerscough MR (2008) Optimal reproduction strategies in two species of mound-building termites. Bull Math Biol 70:189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-007-9248-3
Chambers DM, Zungoli PA, Hill HS Jr (1988) Distribution and habitats of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in South Carolina. J Econ Entomol 81:1611–1619. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/81.6.1611
Chiu C-I, Yeh H-T, Tsai M-J, Li H-F (2016) Naturalization and control of Coptotermes gestroi (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae) in a Taiwanese Forest. J Econ Entomol 109:1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tow050
Connétable S, Robert A, Bordereau C (2012) Dispersal flight and colony development in the fungus-growing termites Pseudacanthotermes spiniger and P. militaris. Insectes Soc 59:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0216-4
Cowie RH, Logan JWM, Wood TG (1989) Termite (Isoptera) damage and control in tropical forestry with special reference to Africa and Indo-Malaysia: a review. Bull Ent Res 79:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300018150
Evangelista PH, Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ, Young NE (2011) Assessing forest vulnerability and the potential distribution of pine beetles under current and future climate scenarios in the Interior West of the US. Forest Ecol Manag 262:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.036
Evans TA (2002a) Assessing efficacy of Termatrac™; a new microwave based technology for non-destructive detection of termites (Isoptera). Sociobiology 40:575–583
Evans TA (2002b) Tunnel specificity and forager movement in subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae and Termitidae). Bull Ent Res 92:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1079/BER2002157
Evans TA, Lenz M, Gleeson PV (1998) Testing assumptions of mark-recapture protocols for estimating population size using Australian, mound-building, subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae and Termitidae). Ecol Entomol 23:139–159
Evans TA, Forschler BT, Grace JK (2013) Biology of invasive termites: a worldwide review. Annu Rev Entomol 58:455–474. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153554
Gandhi KJK, Herm DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasions 12:389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9627-9
Gao S, Wang X, Wiemann MC, Brashaw BK, Ross RJ, Wang L (2017) A critical analysis of methods for rapid and nondestructive determination of wood density in standing trees. Ann For Sci 74:27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0623-4
Gray B, Buchter J (1969) Termite eradication in Araucaria plantations in New Guinea. Commonw For Rev 48:201–207
Grube S, Forschler BT (2004) Census of monogyne and polygyne laboratory colonies illuminates dynamics of population growth in Reticulitermes flavipes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:466–475. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097%5b0466:COMAPL%5d2.0.CO;2
Guillot FS, Ring DR, Lax AR, Morgan A, Brown K (2010) Area-wide management of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus, Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in the New Orleans French Quarter. Sociobiology 55:311–338
Harris WV (1966a) The role of termites in tropical forestry. Insectes Soc 13:255–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02222385
Harris WV (1966b) On the genus Coptotermes in Africa (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Proc Roy Ent Soc Lond B 35:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1966.tb00519.x
Henderson G Forschler BT (1996) Termite bait screening using naturally-infested trees. In: Wildey KB (ed) Proceedings of the second international conference on insect pests in urban environment. BPC Wheaton Ltd., Exeter, pp 449–458
Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu Rev Entomol 59:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162051
Hochmair HH, Tonini F, Scheffrahn RH (2013) The role of geographic information systems for analyzing infestations and spread of invasive termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae and Termitidae) in urban south Florida. Fla Entomol 96:746–755. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0307
Howell HN, Gold RE, Glenn GJ (2001) Coptotermes distribution in Texas (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 37:687–697
Hu J, Zhong JH, Guo MF (2007) Alate dispersal distances of the black-winged subterranean termite Odontotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Termitidae) in Southern China. Sociobiology 50:1–8
Hu J, Angeli S, Schuetz S, Luo Y, Hajek AE (2009) Ecology and management of exotic and endemic Asian longhorned beetle Anoplophora glabripennis. Agric For Entomol 11:359–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2009.00443.x
Husseneder C, Simms DM, Delatte JR, Wang C, Grace JK, Vargo EL (2012) Genetic diversity and colony breeding structure in native and introduced ranges of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus. Biol Invasions 4:419–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0087-7
Isik F, Li B (2003) Rapid assessment of wood density of live trees using the Resistograph for selection in tree improvement programs. Can J For Res 33:2426–2435. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-176
Iwata R, Kodama J (2007) Damage done to trees by termites. Jpn J Environ Entomol Zool 18:55–66 (in Japanese)
Jasmi AH, Ahmad AH (2011) Termite incidence on an Araucaria plantation forest in Teluk Bahang, Penang. Insects 2:469–474. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects2040469
Jenkins TM, Dean RE, Forschler BT (2002) DNA technology, interstate commerce, and the likely origin of Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) infestation in Atlanta, Georgia. J Econ Entomol 95:381–389. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.2.381
Johnstone D, Moore G, Tausz M, Nicolas M (2013) The measurement of plant vitality in landscape trees. Arboric J 35:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2013.783746
King EG, Spink WT (1969) Foraging galleries of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus, in Louisiana. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:536–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/62.3.536
La Fage JP (1987) Practical consideration of the Formosan subterranean termite in Louisiana: a 30-year-old problem. In: Tamashiro M, Su NY (eds) Biology and control of the Formosan subterranean termite. Proceedings of the international symposium on the Formosan subterranean termite. University of Hawaii, Research Extension Series 083, pp 37–42
Lai PY, Tamashiro M, Yates JR, Su NY, Fujii JK, Ebesu RH (1983) Living plants in Hawaii attacked by Coptotermes formosanus. Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc 24:283–286. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/11161. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
Lax AR, Osbrink WLA (2003) United states department of agricutlure–agricultural research service research on targeted management of the Formosan subterranean termite Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Pest Manag Sci 59:788–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.721
Lax AR, Wiltz BA (2010) Swarming of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Southern Mississippi. Midsouth Entomologist 3:18–25. http://midsouthentomologist.org.msstate.edu/Volume3/Vol3_1_html_files/Vol3_1_003.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
Lee KC, Sun JZ, Zhu YC, Mallette EJ (2009) A case study of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) transported with a non-cellulosic commercial carrier in south Mississippi. Sociobiology 53:619–630
Lee TRC, Cameron SL, Evans TA, Ho SYW, Lo N (2015) The origins and radiation of Australian Coptotermes termites: from rainforest to desert dwellers. Mol Phylogenet Evol 82:234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.026
Lee TRC, Evans TA, Cameron SL, Hochuli DF, Ho SYW, Lo N (2017) Ecological diversification of the Australian Coptotermes termites and the evolution of mound building. J Biogeogr 44:1405–1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12878
Little NS, Blount NA, Caprio MA, Riggins JJ (2014) Survey of subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) utilization of temperate forests. Sociobiology 62:198–206. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.198-206
Lovett GM, Canham CD, Arthur RA, Weathers KC, Fitzhugh RD (2006) Forest ecosystem responses to exotic pests and pathogens in eastern North America. BioScience 56:395–405
Mankin RW, Osbrink WL, Oi Anderson JB (2002) Acoustic detection of termite infestations in urban trees. J Econ Entomol 95:981–988. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.5.981
Mattheck C, Bethge K, Albrecht W (1997) How to read the results of resistograph. Arboric J 21:331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1997.9747179
Messenger MT, Mullins AJ (2005) New flight distance recorded for Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Fla Entomol 88:99–100. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2005)088%5b0099:NFDRFC%5d2.0.CO;2
Messenger MT, Su N-Y, Scheffrahn RH (2002) Current distribution of the Formosan subterranean termite and other termite species (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae, Kalotermitidae) in Louisiana. Fla Entomol 85:580–587. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085%5b0580:CDOTFS%5d2.0.CO;2
Messenger MT, Su NY, Husseneder C, Grace JK (2005) Elimination and reinvasion studies with Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Louisiana. J Econ Entomol 98:916–929. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-98.3.916
Moore W (1999) The combined use of the resistograph and the shigometer for the accurate mapping and diagnosis of the internal condition of woody support organs of trees. Arboric J 23:273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1999.9747245
Morales-Ramos JA, Rojas MG (2001) Nutritional ecology of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae): feeding response to commercial wood species. J Econ Entomol 94:516–523. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-96.1.106
Mori H (1987) The Formosan subterranean termite in Japan: its distribution, damage, and current and potential control measures. In: Tamashiro M, Su NY (eds) Biology and control of the Formosan subterranean termite. Proceedings of the international symposium on the Formosan subterranean termite. University of Hawaii, Research Extension Series 083, pp 23–26
Muirhead-Thompson RC (1991) Trap responses of flying insects: the influence of trap design on capture. Academic Press, London
Mullins AJ, Messenger MT, Hochmair HH, Tonini F, Su NY, Riegel C (2015) Dispersal flights of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). J Econ Entomol 108:707–719. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov022
Orwig DA, Foster DR, Mausel DL (2002) Landscape patterns of hemlock decline in New England due to the introduced hemlock woolly adelgid. J Biogeogr 29:1475–1487. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00765.x
Osbrink WL, Lax AR (2002) Termite gallery characterization in living trees using digital resistograph technology. In: Robinson WH (ed) Proceedings of 4th international conference on urban pests. Charleston, USA, pp 251–258
Osbrink WLA, Lax AR (2003) Effect of imidacloprid tree treatments on the occurrence of Formosan subterranean termites, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), in independent monitors. J Econ Entomol 96:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-96.1.117
Osbrink WL, Woodson WD, Lax AR (1999) Populations of Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), established in living urban trees in New Orleans, Louisiana. In: Robinson WH, Rettich F, Rambo GW (eds) Proceedings of 3rd international conference on urban pests. Graficke Zavody Hronov, Czech Republic, pp 341–345
Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002
Ridley HN (1909) Tree attacked by Termes gestroi. Agric Bull Straits Fed Malay States 8:563–564. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/148273#page/691/mode/1up. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
Rinn F, Schweingruber FH, Schar E (1996) Resistograph and x-ray density charts of wood comparative evaluations of drill resistance profiles and x-ray density charts of different wood species. Holzforschung 50:303–311
Roy-Noël J (1966) Description de l’imago et de quelques formes jeunes de néoténiques chez Coptotermes intermedius Silvestri (Isoptère). Lnsectes Soc 13:217–224
Scheffrahn RH, Su N-Y (2005) Distribution of the termite genus Coptotermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Florida. Fla Entomol 88:201–203. https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2005)088%5b0201:DOTTGC%5d2.0.CO;2
Shelton TG, Hu XP, Appel AG, Wagner TL (2006) Flight speed of tethered Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) alates. J Insect Behav 19:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-9012-1
Speight MR, Wylie FR (2001) Insect pests in tropical forestry. CABi Publishing, Oxford
Sun J-Z, Lockwood ME, Etheridge JL, Carroll J, Hollomon CZ, Coker CEH, Knight PR (2007) Distribution of Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Mississippi. J Econ Entomol 100:1400–1408. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100%5b1400:DOFSTI%5d2.0.CO;2
Suppo C, Robinet C, Perdereau E, Andrieu D, Bagnères AG (2018) Potential spread of the invasive North American termite, Reticulitermes flavipes, and the impact of climate warming. Biol Invasions 20:905–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1581-3
Tascioglu C, Yoshimura T, Tsunoda K (2013) Biological performance of wood–plastic composites containing zinc borate: laboratory and 3-year field test results. Compos B Eng 51:185–190
Tho YP (1982) Termites of peninsula Malaysia. Malayan forest records no. 36. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur
Thorne BL, Breisch NL, Haverty MI (2002) Longevity of kings and queens and first time of production of fertile progeny in dampwood termite (Isoptera; Termopsidae; Zootermopsis) colonies with different reproductive structures. J Anim Ecol 71:1030–1041. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00666.x
Tobin PC, Bai BB, Eggen DA, Leonard DS (2012) The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States. Int J Pest Manag 58:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2011.647836
Tonini F, Hochmair HH, Scheffrahn RH, Deangelis DL (2013) Simulating the spread of an invasive termite in an urban environment using a stochastic individual-based model. Environ Entomol 42:412–423. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN12325
Wang C, Powell JE, Liu Y (2002) A literature review of the biology and ecology of Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in China. Sociobiology 40:343–364
Werner PA, Prior LD (2007) Tree-piping termites and growth and survival of host trees in savanna woodland of north Australia. J Trop Ecol 23:611–622. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467407004476
Werner PA, Prior LD, Forner J (2008) Growth and survival of termite-piped Eucalyptus tetrodonta and E. miniata in northern Australia: Implications for harvest of trees for didgeridoos. Forest Ecol Manag 256:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.027
Yasuda I, Nakasone Y, Kinjo K, Yaga S (2000) Morphology and distribution of termites in Ryukyu islands and north and south Daito islands. Jpn J Entomol (New Series) 3:139–156
Yela JL, Holyoak M (1997) Effects of moonlight and meteorological factors on light and bait trap catches of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 26:1283–1290. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/26.6.1283
Zhung J, Liu L (2003) Experience with Coptotermes formosanus in China (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 41:17–26
Zorzenon FJ, Campos AEC (2015) Subterranean termites in urban forestry: tree preference and management. Neotrop Entomol 44:180–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-014-0269-y
Acknowledgements
We thank Julie Arnold of the Santee Experimental Forest, US Forest Service, Ken Brown, Edward Freytag, Timmy Madere and Eric Guidry of the New Orleans Mosquito, Termite and Rodent Control Board, Pat Zungoli of Clemson University, Joe Lockwood of Trimex Pest Control and Bert Snyder of Palmetto Pest Control for their logistical support, tree identification and supplying local knowledge about C. formosanus distribution. We thank the Australian Academy of Science, International Sciences Linkages Scheme, and the USDA Forest Service, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center for support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, T.A., Forschler, B.T. & Trettin, C.C. Not just urban: The Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus, is invading forests in the Southeastern USA. Biol Invasions 21, 1283–1294 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1899-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1899-5