Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that the Chryseobacterium sp. WR21 could effectively control the bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum through effective root colonization. The strain WR21 exhibited a low level of DNA homology with Chryseobacterium strains DSM 15235T (24.1%), DSM 17724T (24.8%), and DSM 18014T (10.4%), suggesting that WR21 may represent a novel species, for which the name Chryseobacterium nankingense sp. nov. is proposed. The in vitro competition experiments with strain WR21 indicated it significantly inhibited growth of the pathogen in co-culture with six of nine tested nutrients (e.g. root exudates) that could be utilized by strain WR21 and R. solanacearum. Similar trends were observed in co-culturing experiments using tissue exudates of tomato. A positive relationship (r = 0.785) was noticed between the differences in the average growth rate of both strains and the disease suppression effects. In conclusion, Chryseobacterium nankingense sp. nov. WR21 exhibits antagonism through nutrient competition that might be used for achieving biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum induced wilts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt disease, inflicting increasing economic losses over time, has emerged as a constant threat to tomato production in Southern China (Hayward 1991; Xue et al. 2009). Rhizosphere has been a predominant source of a wide variety of biocontrol agents both cultivable as well as that of metagenomics origin (Riaz et al. 2008; Dessaux et al. 2016). The application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) to control soil-borne diseases has been widely recognized as an environment friendly alternative to the use of chemicals (Kheirandish and Harighi 2015; Ling et al. 2010; Tan et al. 2013). Mutualism, commensalism, neutralism, competition, amensalism, parasitism, predation, and various combinations thereof have been demonstrated as effective processes of microbial physiology that help PGPRs achieving effective biocontrol against soil-borne pathogens (Francis et al. 2010; Pérez-García et al. 2011). Microorganisms that are better adapted to utilize root exudates in a particular environment under a given set of conditions compete better for these nutrients thereby efficiently colonizing the roots and the rhizosphere (Dessaux et al. 2016). Theoretically, biocontrol agents that colonize the rhizosphere for long periods can effectively utilize such root exudates, thereby providing them an advantage in competition. Soil carbon concentration is one of the key factors that limits microbial growth in soil (Helal and Sauerbeck 1986). Carbon release in the rhizosphere through root exudates affects the chemical, physical and biological characteristics of the rhizosphere to differ from those of the bulk soil. The magnitude of these changes in soil properties is largely determined by the amount and type of carbon released from the roots in addition to the intrinsic soil characteristics (Haichar et al. 2014; Jones et al. 2004). Hence, it was observed that 75% of the soil bacteria that suppressed the tomato bacterial wilt disease could in fact efficiently utilize pectic exudates (the primary exudates of tomato plants) (Shiomi et al. 1999). These bacteria were identified as β-Proteobacteria and were the primary reason for the suppression of R. solanacearum. Similarly, Malic acid, an organic acid, is a root exudate of Arabidopsis thaliana that can successfully induce the colonization by Bacillus subtilis FB17 (Rudrappa and Bais 2008).
Recently, effective tomato root colonizing bacteria could also be isolated from the rhizosphere of Ralstonia-wilted plants where R. solanacearum was present in higher density (greater than 108 cfu g−1 dry soil) (Huang et al. 2013). It is supposed that, if PGPRs successfully survive in a pathogen-prevalent environment, they must have developed particular survival strategies, which would help them under the stress exerted by the pathogens. Consequently, the Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 was found to be prevalent in the rhizosphere soil of diseased tomato plants (Huang et al. 2013). Further studies clearly demonstrated that the Chryseobacterium sp. could not only successfully colonize the tomato rhizosphere but also reduced the density of R. solanacearum, and hence the incidence of bacterial wilt disease (Huang et al. 2013). However, the mechanism by which Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 successfully colonized the tomato rhizosphere and competed against the R. solanacearum remained unclear.
To address this question, root exudate utilization efficacy was hypothesized to be the determining factor for Chryseobacterium sp. WR21, for both root colonization and competitive exclusion of the pathogens. To examine this hypothesis, the ability of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 and the pathogen to utilize 48 chemical nutrients, previously used to mimic tomato root exudates (Wei et al. 2015), was compared in this study. Previous studies suggested that the strain WR21 was closely related to Chryseobacterium daecheongense (HQ220102), nevertheless, only exhibiting an identity of 97% based on 16S rRNA gene sequence clustering (Huang et al. 2013). Therefore, in the present study, DNA–DNA hybridization and other chemotaxonomic analyses were performed to further identify the taxonomic status of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21. On the basis of the physiological, chemotaxonomic, and phylogenetic data, it has been proposed that the strain WR21 represents a novel species of the genus Chryseobacterium.
Materials and methods
Strains and culture conditions
The Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 (GenBank accession: JF700397) was maintained on Luria–Bertani agar plates at 30 °C (LB, peptone 10 g l−1, yeast 5 g l−1 and NaCl 10 g l−1) (Huang et al. 2013). Ralstonia solanacearum QL-Rs1115 strain (GenBank accession: GU390462) tagged with the pYC12-mCherry plasmid was used as a model bacterial pathogen (Wei et al. 2011; Tan et al. 2016). R. solanacearum QL-Rs1115 was maintained on Casein Peptone Glucose agar plate (CPG) supplemented with 0.005% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (m/v) for two days at 30 °C. The bacterial strains were provided by the Laboratory of Rhizosphere Micro-ecology, Nanjing Agricultural University, China.
Phenotypic, physiological, and biochemical characterization
The Gram reaction was determined by the conventional Gram-staining method (Smibert and Krieg 1994). Cell morphology was observed under a Zeiss light microscope at ×1000 magnification after three-day growth at 28 °C on Tryptose Soya Agar plate (TSA). Catalase and oxidase activity was tested as described by McCarthy and Cross (1984). The optimum pH range (pH 4.0–10.0 at intervals of 0.5 pH unit) for growth was determined in TSB that was buffered with either citrate/phosphate or Tris/hydrochloride buffers. Tolerance to NaCl was tested in TSB containing 0–7% NaCl (w/v) at 0.5% increments. Growth on TSA was tested under various temperature conditions (5, 10, 20, 25, 28, 30, 37, 40, 42, and 45 °C). Additional biochemical tests were performed to assess the carbon source utilization pattern by the Biolog GN2 and the API ZYM, API 20E, and API 20NE (BioMérieux Co., Ltd., Marcy-l′Etoile, France) microtest systems according to the methods outlined by the manufacturer. The DNA base composition analyses (mol% G+C) was conducted by the Identification Service of the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen and Zellkulturen (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany. DNA–DNA hybridization was performed to determine the genomic relatedness as described by Ley et al. (1970), with modifications as described by Huss et al. (1983), using a Cary model 100 Bio UV/VIS-spectrophotometer equipped with a Peltier-Thermostatted 6 × 6 multi-cell changer and a temperature controller equipped with an in situ temperature probe (Varian Co., Ltd., USA).
The 16S rRNA gene sequence was identified by BLAST search analysis on EzTaxon-e server and the identification of phylogenetic neighbors and calculation of pairwise 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity were achieved (Kim et al. 2012). The phylogenetic analysis was performed using the software package MEGA version 6.0 after multiple alignments of the sequence data with CLUSTAL X (Tamura et al. 2013). Distances were calculated using distance options according to Kimura’s two-parameter model, and clustering was performed with Neighbor-Joining. Confidence values for the branches of phylogenetic trees were determined by using bootstrap analyses (based on 1000 re-sampling).
Resource utilization and competition pattern of Chryseobacterium sp. WR21 and R. solanacearum in laboratory microcosms
Firstly, the resource consumption pattern of each bacterial strain was determined individually in single-species monocultures on 48 compounds representative of amino acids, organic acids, and sugars found in tomato root exudates (supplementary Table S1). Briefly, overnight cultures were adjusted to an optical density of 0.1 (OD600) and were grown in microtiter plates in 150 µl OS minimal medium (Schnider-Keel et al. 2000) supplemented with each chemical compound with the final concentration of 10 mmol l−1. After 48-h growth at 25 °C with agitation, the optical density was recorded using a SpectraMax M5 plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Wells with an OD600 > 0.05 were scored as positive for growth on a given substrate.
Depending upon the above results, nine nutrients, which could be used by both Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 and the pathogen R. solanacearum, were selected for the nutrient competition test. The Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 and R. solanacearum were first grown alone in a liquid nutrient medium (NA, glucose 10.0 g l−1, peptone 5.0 g l−1, yeast extract 0.5 g l−1, beef extract 3.0 g l−1, pH 7.0) on a shaker at 170 rpm and 30 °C for 12 h. Afterwards, the densities of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 and R. solanacearum were adjusted to 107 cells ml−1 in 0.85% NaCl solution. Suspensions of monocultures or a 1:1 mixture (volume) of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 and R. solanacearum were inoculated into nine different nutrients environments, each of which comprised OS minimal medium supplemented with one kind of nutrient. The final concentration of each nutrient was 10 mmol l−1 and the initial density (OD600) of the inoculum was 0.05. The cultures were grown in microtiter plate (200 µl well−1) at 30 °C with agitation. Bacterial growth was recorded every 2 h based on the optical density (OD600), and pathogen growth was recorded based on the red fluorescence signal (excitation: 587 nm, emission: 610 nm) for 48 h.
Resource competition pattern of Chryseobacterium sp. WR21 and R. solanacearum in tissue exudates of tomato
The root exudates collected according to Kamilova et al. (2005), were sterilized by filtering through 0.22-µm membrane for further use. The inoculant suspensions of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 and the pathogen R. solanacearum were adjusted to 107 cells ml−1 in 0.85% NaCl solution. Suspensions of monocultures or a 1:1 mixture (volume) of Chryseobacterium sp. WR21 and R. solanacearum were inoculated into 96-well microtiter plate with 200 µl root exudates in each cell. The initial density (OD600) of the inoculum was 0.05, and the cultures were grown at 30 °C with agitation for 72 h. Bacterial and pathogen growth was determined using the above explained method.
Data analysis
All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Differences among treatments were assessed with one-way ANOVA or t-tests at the end of each assay and means were subjected to Duncan’s multiple range tests at P < 0.05 using SPSS BASE ver.16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Regression analysis was performed using Sigma-plot 12.0. Illustrations and tables were also completed by Sigma-plot 12.0.
Results
Identification of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21
The Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 was Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, non-spore-forming, nonmotile, rod-shaped, 0.5–0.8 μm wide, and 1.5–2.0 μm long. The colonies of Chryseobacterium sp. WR21 appeared circular, shiny, and smooth with entire margins, and produced a yellow non-diffusible flexirubin-type pigment.
The growth of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 occurred at 15–40 °C, pH 5.0–8.0, and 0–4.0% NaCl (w/v), being optimal at 25–30 °C, pH 7.0–7.5, and 0.5% NaCl (w/v). The strain WR21 showed positive catalase, oxidase, and indole production activity. H2S production, nitrate reduction, urease, arginine dihydrolase, and β-galactosidase activities were negative. Starch hydrolysis was positive while aesculin, casein, and gelatin hydrolyses were negative. Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 did not utilize glucose, mannose, arabinose, maltose, glyconate, and sodium acetate as sole carbon source. The strain WR21 produced acid from glucose and maltose. The G+C content of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 was 36.6 mol% (Table 1).
The fatty acid profiling depicted that the major detected fatty acids (>5% of the total fatty acids) were iso-C15:0 (38.1%), iso-C17:1ω9c (18.8%), 17:0 iso-C17:03-OH (17.1%), and the summed feature 3 (C16:lω7c/15 iso 2-OH, 10.5%) (Table 2). DNA–DNA hybridization was performed between strain WR21 and Chryseobacterium daecheongense DSM 15235T, Chryseobacterium wanjuense DSM 17724T, and Chryseobacterium gambrini DSM 18014T (Table 3). Low levels of DNA homology were found between Chryseobacterium sp. strains WR21 and DSM 15235T (24.1%), DSM 17724T (24.8%), or DSM 18014T (10.4 %) (Table 3). The Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 (ID 12-199) was distinct from DSM 15235T (ID 12-200), DSM 17724T (ID 12-201), and DSM 18014T (ID 12-202) based on the recommended threshold value of 70% DNA homology for the definition of a bacterial species by the ad hoc committee (Friginal et al. 2014) (Table 3).
The 16S rRNA sequence of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 was a continuous stretch of 1418 base pairs. Pairwise similarity calculations indicated that the closest relative of Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 was C. daecheongense (98.0%), C. wanjuense (97.5%), and C. gambrini (97.3%). The phylogenetic reconstruction, based on Neighbor-Joining analyses, indicated that Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 occupied a distinct branch from its closest relatives within the genus Chryseobacterium (Fig. 1).
On the basis of the physiological, chemotaxonomic, and phylogenetic data, strain WR21 represents a novel species within the genus Chryseobacterium. Here, we named Chryseobacterium sp. strain WR21 as Chryseobacterium nankingense sp. nov., as it was isolated from the rhizosphere of a tomato field near Nanjing (Huang et al. 2013).
Competition for nutrients between Chryseobacterium nankingense strain WR21 and Ralstonia solanacearum
Forty-eight nutrients were tested in this study. Twenty of them could be utilized by C. nankingense strain WR21 and 23 by the pathogen R. solanacearum (RS). Among these nutrients, nine were utilized by both C. nankingense WR21 and RS (Table 4).
Chryseobacterium nankingense WR21 exhibited different suppression effects when grown in the presence of different nutrients. Suppression effects greater than 40% were observed with six nutrients: l-Asparagine (Asp), l-Glutamine (Gln), l-Histidine (His), l-Leucine (Leu), Myo-Inositol (Ino), and 2-Oxoglutarate (Oxo). The strongest effect was observed with Asp (57.6%), which was significantly higher than other nutrients excluding Gln (F = 197.1, df = 8, 18, P < 0.001). C. nankingense WR21 exhibited lower than 30% suppression (29.2, 19.0, and 12.4%, respectively) with remaining three nutrients Glucose (Glu), l-Proline (Pro), and l-Threonine (Thr) (Fig. 2a). C. nankingense WR21 exhibited a higher average growth rate (i.e. OD600 h−1) compared to R. solanacearum with seven out of nine common nutrients (Asp, Glu, Gln, His, Leu, Ino, and Oxo) and presented a lower average growth rate than R. solanacearum with two nutrients (Pro and Thr). The highest and lowest growth rates were both exhibited by C. nankingense WR21 with Gln and Pro, respectively, and the highest one was significantly higher than all others excluding Ino (F = 96.8, df = 8, 18, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2b). We analyzed the linear relationship between the difference of the average growth rates between C. nankingense WR21 and RS, the D-value was calculated from the average growth rates of C. nankingense WR21 to RS with the unit of △OD600 h−1, and the suppressive effects. The results showed a positive relationship (r = 0.785, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2c).
Competition for tomato root exudates between Chryseobacterium nankingense strain WR21 and Ralstonia solanacearum
Chryseobacterium nankingense WR21 exhibited a higher growth rate than R. solanacearum in root tissue exudates of tomato in monoculture conditions, and the OD600 of C. nankingense WR21 remained higher than that of R. solanacearum throughout the experiment. At the end of the experiment, the OD600 of C. nankingense WR21 was 0.521, whereas the OD600 of R. solanacearum was 0.464 (Fig. 3a). Compared to the monoculture conditions, the growth of R. solanacearum was significantly inhibited in co-culture experiments (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3b). The fluorescence of R. solanacearum ranged from 1217.9 down to 634.5 at the end of the experiment (72 h after cultivation), and the suppression effect was calculated as 47.9%.
Discussion
The genus Chryseobacterium was first proposed in 1994 and comprised 63 species Vandamme et al. (1994). (Vandamme et al. 1994; Euzéby 1997). However, the novel taxa are continuously emerging within this group, some of which are pathogenic to humans and animals as well (Bernardet et al. 2005). Strains belonging to this genus are distributed among a wide variety of habitats, such as plants, soil, sewage, freshwater, marine sediments, clinical environments, and the food processing industry. The importance of Chryseobacterium can be recognized from the recent studies demonstrating that the genus could serve as a novel source of bioactive compounds, such as proteases that help them to survive under specific environments (Wang et al. 2008). In addition, secondary metabolites confer a selective and competitive advantage to the bacteria that produce them against other microorganisms, further contributing to the rhizo-competence and root colonization abilities of the competent biocontrol agents (BCAs) (Compant et al. 2010; Lugtenberg and Kamilova 2009).
Chryseobacterium nankingense WR21 was able to compete effectively with R. solanacearum for unique compounds and root tissue exudates, which provide a partial explanation for the underlying mechanism for the colonization ability exhibited by C. nankingense WR21 (Huang et al. 2013). Although, rhizosphere environment is lucrative, it is pertinent to note that the concentrations and variety of nutrients in the rhizosphere soil are much greater than those in the bulk soils. Also, their composition change with respect to plant age, physiology and interactions with the environment. Hence, for greater adaptability and performance, the BCAs must compete for efficient nutrient and niche acquisition in order to survive in the rhizosphere (Haichar et al. 2014; Ziegler et al. 2013). Once installed, these BCAs outcompete the pathogens and hence the disease incidence is decreased. In this study, among the tested nutrients, four amino acids (Asp, Gln, His, and Leu; Fig. 2a) strongly supported the suppression of the R. solanacearum growth by C. nankingense WR21. Positive contribution of higher amounts of amino acids in exudates in enhancing bacterial chemotaxis towards roots has been reported, such as the chemotaxis of Pseudomonas fluorescens towards the root exudates in solarized soil (Weger et al. 1987; Gamliel and Katan 1992). The specific nutrient utilization by proficient colonizers might distinguish them from less efficient colonizers (Oksinska et al. 2011).
In conclusion, we found a novel biocontrol agent Chryseobacterium nankingense sp. nov. WR21 that could effectively compete for nutrients (especially certain amino acids) with R. solanacearum. This effect might aid C. nankingense WR21 in its successful colonization of the tomato rhizosphere, where it could suppress bacterial wilt disease caused by R. solanacearum.
References
Bernardet JF, Vancanneyt M, Matte-Tailliez O, Grisez L, Tailliez P, Bizete C, Nowakowskie M, Kerouaulta B, Swings J (2005) Polyphasic study of Chryseobacterium strains isolated from diseased aquatic animals. Syst Appl Microbiol 28:640–660
Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A (2010) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42:669–678
Dessaux Y, Grandclément C, Faure D (2016) Engineering the rhizosphere. Trends Plant Sci 21(3):266–278
Euzéby JP (1997) List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature a folder available on the internet. Int J Syst Bact 47:590–592
Francis I, Holsters M, Vereecke D (2010) The gram-positive side of plant-microbe interactions. Environ Microbiol 12:1–12
Friginal J, Andrés D, Ruiz JC, Martínez M (2014) A survey of evaluation platforms for ad hoc routing protocols: a resilience perspective. Comput Netw 75:395–413
Gamliel A, Katan J (1992) Chemotaxis of fluorescent pseudomonads towards seed exudates and germinating seeds in solarized soil. Ecol Epidemiol 82:328–332
Haichar FeZ, Santaella C, Heulin T, Achouak W (2014) Root exudates mediated interactions belowground. Soil Biol Biochem 77:69–80
Hayward AC (1991) Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Ann Rev Phytopathol 29:65–87
Helal HM, Sauerbeck D (1986) Effect of plant roots on carbon metabolism of soil microbial biomass. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 149:181–188
Huang JF, Wei Z, Tan SY, Mei XL, Yin SX, Shen QR, Xu YC (2013) The rhizosphere soil of diseased tomato plants as a source for novel microorganisms to control bacterial wilt. Appl Soil Ecol 72:79–84
Huss VAR, Festl H, Schleifer KH (1983) Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Syst Appl Microbiol 4:184–192
Jones DL, Hodge A, Kuzyakov Y (2004) Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. New Phytol 163:459–480
Kamilova F, Validov S, Azarova T, Mulders I, Lugtenberg B (2005) Enrichment for enhanced competitive plant root tip colonizers selects for a new class of biocontrol bacteria. Environ Microbiol 7:1809–1817
Kheirandish Z, Harighi B (2015) Evaluation of bacterial antagonists of Ralstonia solanacearum, causal agent of bacterial wilt of potato. Biol Control 86:14–19
Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M, Na H, Park SC, Jeon YS, Lee JH, Yi H, Won S, Chun J (2012) Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA Gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721
Ley JD, Cattoir H, Reynaerts A (1970) The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 12:133–142
Ling N, Xue C, Huang QW, Yang XM, Xu YC, Shen QR (2010) Development of a mode of application of bioorganic fertilizer for improving the biocontrol efficacy to Fusarium wilt. BioControl 55:673–683
Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 63:541–556
McCarthy AJ, Cross T (1984) A taxonomic study of Thermomonospora and other monosporic actinomycetes. J Gen Microbiol 130:5–25
Oksinska MP, Wright SAI, Pietr SJ (2011) Colonization of wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) by strains of Pseudomonas spp. with respect to their nutrient utilization profiles. Eur J Soil Biol 47:364–373
Pérez-García A, Romero D, Vicente Ad (2011) Plant protection and growth stimulation by microorganisms: biotechnological applications of Bacilli in agriculture. Curr Opin Biotech 22:187–193
Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Moënne-Loccoz Y (2008) The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:341–361
Riaz K, Elmerich C, Raffoux A, Moreira D, Dessaux Y, Faure D (2008) A metagenomic analysis of soil bacteria extends the diversity of quorum-quenching lactonases. Environ Microbiol 10(3):560–570
Rudrappa T, Bais HP (2008) Rhizospheric pseudomonads: friends or foes? Plant Signal Behav 3:1132–1133
Schnider-Keel U, Seematter A, Maurhofer M, Blumer C, Duffy B, Gigot-Bonnefoy C, Reimmann C, Notz R, Défago G, Haas D, Keel C (2000) Autoinduction of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis in the biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 and repression by the bacterial metabolites salicylate and pyoluteorin. J Bacteriol 182(5):1215–1225
Shiomi Y, Nishiyama M, Onizuka T, Marumoto T (1999) Comparison of bacterial community structures in the rhizoplane of tomato plants grown in soils suppressive and conducive towards bacterial wilt. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3996–4001
Smibert RM, Krieg NR (1994) Phenotypic characterization. In: Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR (eds) Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 607–654
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Bio Evol 30:2725–2729
Tan SY, Jiang Y, Song S, Huang JF, Ling N, Xu YC, Shen QR (2013) Two Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains isolated using the competitive tomato root enrichment method and their effects on suppressing Ralstonia solanacearum and promoting tomato plant growth. Crop Prot 43:134–140
Tan SY, Gu YA, Yang CL, Dong Y, Mei XL, Shen QR, Xu YC (2016) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens T-5 may prevent Ralstonia solanacearum infection through competitive exclusion. Biol Fertil Soils 52:341–351
Vandamme P, Bernardet JF, Segers P, Kersters K, Holmes B (1994) New perspectives in the classification of the Flavobacteria: description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:827–831
Wang SL, Yang CH, Liang TW, Yen YH (2008) Optimization of conditions for protease production by Chryseobacterium taeanense TKU001. Bioresour Technol 99:3700–3707
Weger LAD, Vlugt CMVD, Wijfjes AHM, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B, Lugtenberg B (1987) Flagella of a plant-growth-stimulating Pseudomonas fluorescens strain are required for colonization of potato roots. J Bacteriol 169:2769–2773
Wei Z, Yang XM, Yin SX, Shen QR, Xu YC (2011) Efficacy of Bacillus-fortified organic fertiliser in controlling bacterial wilt of tomato in the field. Appl Soil Ecol 48:152–159
Wei Z, Yang TJ, Friman VP, Xu YC, Shen QR, Jousset A (2015) Trophic network architecture of root-associated bacterial communities determines pathogen invasion and plant health. Nat Commun 6:1–9
Weller D (1988) Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:379–407
Xue QY, Chen Y, Li SM, Chen LF, Ding GC, Guo DW, Guo JH (2009) Evaluation of the strains of Acinetobacter and Enterobacter as potential biocontrol agents against Ralstonia wilt of tomato. Biol Control 48:252–258
Ziegler M, Engel M, Welzl G, Schloter M (2013) Development of a simple root model to study the effects of single exudates on the development of bacterial community structure. J Microbiol Methods 94:30–36
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Shixue Yin from Yangzhou University and Dr. Jun Zhang from Nanjing Agricultural University for helpful assistance in the identification of Chryseobacterium nankingense strain WR21. We also are highly grateful to Prof. Dr. mark L Gleason for the correction of this manuscript. This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501837 to Jianfeng Huang, 41471213 to Yangchun Xu, 41671248 and 41301262 to Zhong Wei), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2015CB150503 to Qirong Shen), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130677 to Zhong Wei), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M541687), the Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (2015QNRC001 to Zhong Wei), and the Qing Lan Project (funding to Yangchun Xu and Zhong Wei).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Fouad Daayf.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, J., Wei, Z., Hu, J. et al. Chryseobacterium nankingense sp. nov. WR21 effectively suppresses Ralstonia solanacearum growth via intensive root exudates competition. BioControl 62, 567–577 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9812-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9812-1