Abstract
Pathological retinal angiogenesis profoundly impacts visual function in vascular eye diseases, such as retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants and age-related macular degeneration in the elderly. While the involvement of photoreceptors in these diseases is recognized, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study delved into the pivotal role of photoreceptors in regulating abnormal retinal blood vessel growth using an oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) mouse model through the c-Fos/A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (Adam17) axis. Our findings revealed a significant induction of c-Fos expression in rod photoreceptors, and c-Fos depletion in these cells inhibited pathological neovascularization and reduced blood vessel leakage in the OIR mouse model. Mechanistically, c-Fos directly regulated the transcription of Adam17 a shedding protease responsible for the production of bioactive molecules involved in inflammation, angiogenesis, and cell adhesion and migration. Furthermore, we demonstrated the therapeutic potential by using an adeno-associated virus carrying a rod photoreceptor-specific short hairpin RNA against c-fos which effectively mitigated abnormal retinal blood vessel overgrowth, restored retinal thickness, and improved electroretinographic (ERG) responses. In conclusion, this study highlights the significance of photoreceptor c-Fos in ROP pathology, offering a novel perspective for the treatment of this disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Retinal photoreceptors, specialized neurons in the eyes, are pivotal components of our visual system, responsible for translating changing light patterns into electrical signals [1]. To safeguard these crucial elements, mammals have developed a unique defense mechanism known as immune privilege, which shields the ocular system from the systemic circulation. This protection ensures that retinal neurons remain unharmed by pathogenic infections or damages, preserving the integrity of the retina and our precious sense of light. However, in numerous vascular ocular diseases that frequently afflict individuals, this immune privilege can be compromised. When this occurs, it can lead to chronic inflammation and abnormal angiogenesis within the eye, ultimately resulting in retinopathy and vison loss. Recent findings have shed light on an intriguing revelation: photoreceptors emerge as a significant source of inflammatory factors under specific health conditions. For instance, in diabetic retinopathy mouse models [2,3,4] and very low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout (Vldlr−/−) mice [5], a model used to study pathological angiogenesis invading the photoreceptor avascular zone [6,7,8,9,10], photoreceptors have been found to actively participate in the immune response. This underscores the importance of immune regulation originating from photoreceptors in the pathology of vascular ocular diseases. Despite these exciting discoveries, the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. We are only at the initial stages of comprehending how photoreceptors contribute to immune responses in the context of these diseases. This knowledge gap underscores the need for further exploration and research to fully elucidate these mechanisms and, ultimately, unlock the potential for innovative treatments that could transform the management of vascular ocular diseases.
To uncover the intricate molecular mechanisms governing immune regulation originating from photoreceptors, a suitable mouse model is essential. The oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) [11,12,13,14] is a widely used mouse model for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a primary cause of childhood blindness in preterm infants characterized by abnormal overgrowth of retinal blood vessels. ROP progression begins with vascular attenuation due to hyperoxia after birth (Phase I), followed by excessive production of vascular growth factors and neovascularization (NV) (Phase II) as the retina develops in relative hypoxia [15]. In ROP patients, NV typically begins around 32-week gestational age [16, 17], regardless of the gestational age at birth, coinciding with the maturation of rod photoreceptor outer segments and full rod photoreceptor function [18]. ROP patients exhibit varying electroretinography (ERG) responses to the severity of acute phase of ROP, indicating the involvement of rod photoreceptors ROP [19]. Studies in Pdebrd1 mutant mice with photoreceptor cell degeneration have shown that they do not develop NV in the OIR model [20]. These findings highlight the OIR model as a valuable tool for investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying immune regulation originating from photoreceptors in the pathology of vascular ocular diseases.
The transcription factor c-Fos encodes a nuclear phosphoprotein that forms heterodimeric complexes with Jun-family molecules to form the activator protein 1 complex (AP-1 complex) [21, 22]. This intricate complex functions as a master regulator, orchestrating numerous inflammatory signaling pathways [23], akin to its involvement in diseases like rheumatoid arthritis [24, 25]. c-Fos is expressed rapidly and transiently across various cell types in response to a wide range of external stimuli [26]. Notably, c-Fos has been identified in the retinal photoreceptors of 26–40 week old human fetuses [27]. Under specific conditions, such as darkness, the expression c-fos is induced in photoreceptors [22]. This highlights the adaptability of c-Fos, which can be activated under various circumstances. In our study, utilizing the OIR mouse model, we made a significant discovery in the context of retina angiogenesis. We observed a substantial upregulation of c-fos gene expression in the rod photoreceptor cells in the OIR mouse model. Notably, when we selectively deleted c-fos in rod photoreceptors within the OIR mouse model, we observed a remarkable reduction in pathological neovascular tufts and decreased blood vessel leakage. This provided compelling evidence of the direct involvement of photoreceptor c-Fos in the regulation of retinal blood vessel growth. Delving deeper into the molecular underpinnings, our investigations involved techniques including CUT&Tag sequencing analysis and luciferase reporter assays. Through these methods, we identified that c-Fos directly regulated the expression of A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (Adam17), a protease responsible for shedding activities. Furthermore, to investigate the therapeutic potential of targeting c-Fos, we employed subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus (AAV) containing c-fos shRNA, specifically targeting rod photoreceptor cells. This intervention yielded remarkable results by attenuating OIR pathology, restoring retinal thickness, and improving ERG responses. In summary, we discovered a central role of photoreceptor c-Fos/Adam17 in the complex processes of retinal angiogenesis, providing a novel perspective for the treatment of vascular eye diseases.
Materials and methods
Animals
All mouse studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Boston Children’s Hospital and all mouse experiments were performed following the guidance of The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) for the ethical use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research. c-fos floxed (c-fosf/f) mice (Jackson Laboratory, stock #037115-JAX) was crossed with rod photoreceptor-specific rhodopsin Cre mice (RhoiCre) (Jackson Laboratory, stock #015850) and rod photoreceptor-specific Nrl Cre mice (NrlCre)(Jackson Laboratory, stock #028941), respectively to generate rod photoreceptor-specific c-fos knockout mice. Both male and female mice were used for all experiments. C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratory, stock # 000664) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory.
Oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) and NV quantification
OIR was induced in neonatal mice as described previously [11, 28]. In brief, mouse pups were placed with nursing female mice and exposed to 75% oxygen from postnatal day (P) 7 to P12. Subsequently, they were returned to room air until P17 for phenotypical analysis and gene expression at the designated time points. For phenotypical analysis, eyes were collected at P17, dissected, and stained with fluorescent dye conjugated- Griffonia Simplicifolia Isolectin IB4 (Invitrogen) overnight, and flat-mounted. The avascular (VO) and pathological NV areas were quantified [13] by researchers who were blinded to the conditions, using Image J (National Institutes of Health, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems). The exclusion criterion for OIR mouse model was used as described previously, wherein mice with a body weight of less than 5 g at P17 were excluded from the study [29].
Preparation of AAV2-CAG-shc-fos vector and AAV
Four independent shRNAs against mouse c-fos were designed using a published algorithm [30]. The sequences of the mouse c-fos shRNAs are described previously [5]. The shRNAs were cloned into a CAGmiR30-GFP plasmid to assess their knockdown efficiency in pup retinas and photoreceptor 661 W cells. Recombinant AAV2 vectors were produced as previously described [31, 32]. In brief, AAV vector, rep/cap packaging plasmid, and adenoviral helper plasmid were combined with polyethylenimine (Sigma) and transfected into HEK293T cells (catalog HCL4517; Thermo Scientific). After 72 h of transfection, cells were harvested, and the cell pellet was resuspended in virus buffer. Subsequently, the suspension underwent three cycles of freeze-thaw and homogenization using a Dounce homogenizer. Cellular debris was pelleted at 5,000 g for 20 min, and the supernatant was layered on an iodixanol gradient. Recovered AAV vectors were washed 3 times with PBS using Amicon 100 K columns (EMD Millipore). Real-time PCR was employed to determine genome titers of the recombinant AAV. This protocol was also used to prepare a control AAV2-shControl. The viruses were diluted to various concentrations for infection tests, with a concentration of approximately 2 × 1012 gc/ml used for the experiments.
Subretinal injection
Subretinal injection into the eyes of neonatal P1 mice was performed as previously described [33, 34] under a dissection microscope. P1 pups were briefly anesthetized on ice. The eyelid was prepared by applying Betadine, followed by water and then 70% ethanol using cotton swabs. A blade was used to gently create an incision in the eyelid. The injection needle was carefully inserted into the eyeball through the incision until slight resistance was encountered. Approximately 0.5 µl solution containing AAV (at a concentration of 1012–1013 gc/ml) was introduced into the subretinal space using a pulled angled glass pipette controlled by a FemtoJet (Eppendorf). Curved forceps were employed to slowly close the eyelid. The mice were then placed on a circulating water blanket to maintain warmth. Retinas were collected at P17 for whole-mount analysis.
Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA)
FFA was performed as described previously [5]. In brief, mice were anesthetized and injected intraperitoneally with fluorescein AK-FLUOR (Akorn) at 5 µg/g body weight. Fluorescent fundus images with dilated pupils were taken with a retinal-imaging microscope (Micron IV; Phoenix Research Laboratories) at 2 and 8 min after fluorescein injection.
Electroretinography (ERG)
Retinal function was assessed by ERG as previously described [35]. In brief, dark-adapted, anesthetized (ketamine/xylazine) mouse pupils were dilated (Cyclomydril; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX), and their corneas were anesthetized (proparacaine). A Burian–Allen bipolar electrode designed for the mouse eye (Hansen Laboratories, Coralville, IA) was placed on the cornea, and the ground electrode was placed on a mouse foot. The stimuli consisted of a series of “green” LED flashes of doubling intensity from ~ 0.0064 to ~ 2.05 cd⋅s⋅m-2 and then “white” xenon-arc flashes from ~ 8.2 to ~ 1050 cd⋅s⋅m-2. The “equivalent light” for the green and white stimuli was determined from the shift of the stimulus/response curves. ERG stimuli were delivered using a Colordome Ganzfeld stimulator (Diagnosys LLC, Lowell, MA). The saturating sensitivity of the rod photo response was estimated by fitting a model of the biochemical processes involved in the activation of phototransduction to the ERG a-waves [36,37,38].
In vivo imaging using optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Mice were anesthetized with a mixture of xylazine (6 mg/kg) and ketamine (100 mg/kg), and pupils were dilated with a topical drop of Cyclomydril (Alcon Laboratories). Two minutes after pupil dilation, lubricating eye drops (Alcon Laboratories) were applied to the cornea. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with guidance of bright-field live fundus image was performed using the image-guided OCT system (Micron IV, Phoenix Research Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instruction and using the vendor’s image acquisition software to generate fundus images and OCT scans. The vendor’s software Insight was used to accurately measure the thickness of retinal layers and entire retinas. The thickness of retinal layers was plotted with 4 distances from the optic nerve head (100, 200, 300, 400 μm).
RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from mouse retina using Quick-RNA™ Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, R1054). cDNA was synthesized using iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, 1708890). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Apex Bio, K1070). Primer sequences used were: c-fos, forward 5’-GGG GAC AGC CTT TCC TAC TA-3’ and reverse 5’-CTG TCA CCG TGG GGA TAA AG-3’; Il6, forward 5’-TAG TCC TTC CTA CCC CAA TTT CC-3’ and reverse 5’-TAG TCC TTC CTA CCC CAA TTT CC-3’; Stat3, forward 5’-GGC ACC TTG GAT TGA GAG TC-3’ and reverse 5’-CGA AGG TTG TGC TGA TAG AGG-3’; Tnf, forward 5’-CGA AGG TTG TGC TGA TAG AGG-3’ and reverse 5’-TGG GAG TAG ACA AGG TAC AAC CC-3’; Vegfa, forward 5’-TGG GAG TAG ACA AGG TAC AAC CC-3’ and reverse 5’-GGC GAT TTA GCA GCA GAT ATA AGA A-3’.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunostaining in retinas was performed as described [14]. In brief, eyes were isolated from P17 OIR mice, fixed and permeabilized. The flat-mounted retinas or cross sections were stained with antibodies and imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FV1000 and Zeiss LSM980).
Immunoblot
A standard immunoblotting protocol was used. In brief, a buffer containing 300 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 0.5 mM EDTA was used to lyse the retinas. Proteinase and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails were added. The antibodies included c-Fos (9F6) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology 2250 S, RRID# AB_2247211), Adam17 antibody (Abcam ab13535, RRID# AB_300436), and β-Actin (D6A8) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling Technology, 8457 S, RRID# AB_10950489).
Luciferase reporter constructs preparation and luciferase reporter assays
DNA fragments containing putative AP-1 binding site in Adam17 promoter regions were amplified from mouse genomic DNA with primers (forward 5’-ATA GCT AGC GTG GCG CAC GCC TTT AAT CC-3’ and reverse 5’-GAG AGA TCT CAC GTC CCC GGA AGT GC-3’), then cloned into luciferase report vector pTA-luc (Clontech). Mutant constructs of Adam17 with deletion in AP-1 sites were also constructed with luciferase reporter. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with c-Fos expressing plasmid (pcDNA3-FLAG-FosWT, Addgene # 8966) and c-Jun expressing plasmid (Flag-JunWT-Myc, Addgene: 47,443), wild type or mutant pTA-luc-Adam17 promoter reporter, or Renilla luciferase vector (pRL-SV40, Promega) alone as control. At 36 h post-transfection, cells were lysed in passive lysis buffer (Promega, Dual-Luciferase assay system) and luciferase reporter activities were measured using a EnSight multimode plate reader (Perkin Elmer).
CUT&Tag sequencing and analysis
CUT&Tag was performed as described [39]. In brief, freshly isolated retinas from three mice were minced and pooled as a group sample. The pooled retinas were incubated in NE1 buffer (20 mM HEPES pH7.8, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM spermidine, 0.1% Triton X-100, 20% glycerol, Roche proteinase inhibitor) for 10 min on ice, then homogenized by Dounce homogenizer. The suspension was centrifuged at 100 x g for 30 s at 4 °C. The supernatant containing nuclei was transferred to a fresh tube. The nuclei number was counted by a hemacytometer. Half a million nuclei were conjugated to activated concanavalin A-coated magnetic beads (Bangs Laboratories, BP531). The beads were separated by a magnet stand and resuspended in Wash buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2.0 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM spermidine, 0.01% digitonin, Roche proteinase inhibitor) with primary antibody (1:50 dilution). After incubation at 4 °C overnight on a rotator, the beads were separated, resuspended in Wash buffer with secondary antibody (1:100 dilution), and incubated for 30 min at RT on a rotator. The antibodies used CUT&Tag were listed in the supplementary Table S1. The beads were washed with Wash buffer once and resuspended in Wash buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5 300 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM spermidine, 0.01% digitonin, Roche proteinase inhibitor) with pAG-Tn5 (EpiCypher, 15-1017). After incubation for 1 h at RT, the beads were washed with Wash buffer while the beads were on a magnet stand. For tagmentation of DNA, the beads were resuspended in Tagmentation buffer (Wash buffer with 10 mM MgCl2) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The tagmentation was eliminated by adding 0.5 M EDTA, 10% SDS, and 20 µg/µl proteinase K (final concentration 16 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 0.16 µg/µl proteinase K) with incubation for 10 min at 70 °C. The tagmented DNA was extracted by phenol-chloroform extraction, precipitated by ethanol precipitation, and dissolved in 21 µl TE buffer containing 1 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA. To prepare CUT&Tag libraries, 2 µl of 10 µM i5 primer, 2 µl of 10 µM barcoded i7 primer, and 25 µl of NEBNext HiFi 2x Master mix (NEB, M0541L) were added. PCR was performed for 12 cycles. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, the libraries were purified using AMPure XP bead (Beckman Coulter, A63880). The concentration of libraries was measured by KAPA library quantification kit (Roche, KK4844) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Paired-end 150 reads sequencing of the pooled libraries was used by the Illumina NextSeq550 system high-output kit. Data processing and analysis were performed using an automated chromatin Immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis pipeline, ChIP-AP (https://github.com/JSuryatenggara/ChIP-AP) [40]. For visualization of CUT&Tag tracks, the integrative genomics viewer (IGV) was used. Excel and JMP Pro were used for the Venn diagram.
scRNA-seq analysis
OIR model mice scRNA-sec dataset (GSE150703) was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Retinal cells were classified by hierarchical clustering (JMP Pro) with retinal cell makers, t-SNE clustering (R package Rtsne), and UMAP clustering (R package umap). The rod photoreceptor cell’s scRNA-seq data were separated and utilized for further analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and Venn diagram were analyzed in Excel and visualized with JMP Pro.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism was used for statistical analysis. Results are presented as means ± Standard Error of the Mean (SEM). All experiments were repeated independently at least three times. Mann-Whitney test was used for two-group comparison. Kruskal-Wallis Dunn’s test was used for multiple-group comparison. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
c-Fos was both induced and activated in the photoreceptor layer during NV development
To explore the potential role of c-Fos in the context of retinopathy, we initiated our investigation by assessing the mRNA expression of the c-fos gene in retinal tissues, both under normal condition and in the presence of OIR. In the OIR mouse model, a two-phase exposure was employed: firstly, mice experienced a hyperoxia stage by being subjected to 75% oxygen levels from postnatal day (P) 7 to P12, known as Phase I vaso-obliteration (VO). Subsequently, they were transitioned to room air with 21% oxygen for an additional 5 days from P12 to P17, representing the hypoxia stage, or Phase II NV. Comparative analysis revealed a noteworthy reduction in c-fos expression during the VO stage, followed by a significant increase during the NV stage in OIR retinas when compared to normal controls (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, c-Fos protein level increased at P14 in OIR retinas, as validated by western blot analysis (Fig. 1B), suggesting its critical role in the OIR process.
We next analyzed the expression of Fos family proteins within rod photoreceptors by leveraging a single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset (GSE150703). Our analysis revealed elevated levels of c-fos, fosB, c-jun, and junB during the NV stage at P14 and P17 (Fig. 1C, D). To further validate the specific induction of c-fos in rod photoreceptors during NV development, we utilized laser-captured microdissection as described [14] to isolate the photoreceptor layer. The examination of c-fos expression in photoreceptor cells during OIR revealed a significant increase in mRNA level in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) of OIR retinas compared to normal retinas during NV development (Fig. 1E).
Phosphorylation of c-Fos by extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) can enhance its transcriptional activity [41]. To assess c-Fos activation during NV, we quantified the level of phosphorylated c-Fos using immunostaining with phospho-c-Fos antibody. In normal retinas, phosphorylated c-Fos was detected in the ONL at P12 and gradually decreased at P13 and P14, suggesting a reduced requirement for c-Fos after the completion of retinal photoreceptor development around P12 [42, 43]. In contrast, OIR retinas exhibited a distinct pattern: the numbers of phosphorylated c-Fos positive cells were significantly reduced at P12 during hyperoxia (Phase I) compared to normal retinas but rapidly increased at P13 when the mice were exposure to hypoxia, indicating a critical role of c-Fos during hypoxic condition (Fig. 1F). Increased phospho-c-Fos at P13 OIR retinas compared to normal retinas was further confirmed with western blots (Fig. 1G). Collectively, our data underscored the dynamic changes in c-Fos expression and activation in rod photoreceptors during OIR, implicating its significance in NV development.
Photoreceptor specific c-Fos deletion effectively suppressed retinal NV and mitigated blood vessel leakage in the OIR model
To unravel the mechanism underlying how rod photoreceptor c-Fos regulates pathological development of NV in mice, we engineered two distinct rod photoreceptor specific c-fos deficient mouse lines (Fig. 2A). Given the opposing regulation of c-fos expression in the two phases of OIR (Fig. 1A), we employed the rhodopsin Cre (RhoiCre/+) mouse line [44] to delete c-Fos expression in late-stage rod development (RhoiCre/+;c-fosf/f). This aligns with the time point at which c-Fos is induced in OIR mice. Additionally, we utilized the neural retina leucine zipper protein (Nrl) Cre (NrlCre/+) mouse line [45] to delete c-Fos (NrlCre/+;c-fosf/f) in the rods and their precursors during the embryonic stage.
The c-fos floxed mice [46], previously validated [47], were crossbred with Cre mice. The RhoiCre/+ mice [44] represent a rod specific Cre line where a 4-kb mouse rod opsin promoter drives the expression of improved Cre (iCre) [48] recombinase in rods. Notably, iCre-mediated genomic DNA excision is detectable as early as at P7, with iCre protein expression reaching to 188 ± 44 ng/retina at P11 [44]. The NrlCre/+ mice [45] constitute another rod specific Cre line characterized by a 1.7 kb promoter upstream of Nrl exons 1 and 2, accompanied by a 724 bp intron, which governs Cre expression in rods and their precursors. Cre-mediated recombination can be detected from embryonic day 14 in rod precursors. The NrlCre/+ mice were employed to deactivate c-fos early in rod precursors and rods (NrlCre/+;c-fosf/f) to investigate the role of photoreceptor c-Fos in ROP development in the OIR model and normal vascular development (Fig. 2A). The RhoiCre/+ mice with rhodopsin promoter [44] were used to deactivate c-fos expression later in rods [44] (RhoiCre/+;c-fosf/f) to investigate the role of photoreceptor c-Fos in the retinal NV phase in the OIR model (Fig. 2B). The knockout efficiency of c-fos was validated at both mRNA and protein levels (Supplemental Fig. 1). It’s important to note that the photoreceptor specificities of Cre expression in NrlCre/+ and RhoiCre/+ mice had been previously confirmed [44, 45]. Our findings indicated that NV was significantly reduced in both NrlCre/+;c-fosf/f and RhoiCre/+;c-fosf/f OIR retinas in comparison to their respective control groups (Fig. 2A, B), highlighting the crucial role of rod c-Fos in the regulation of NV. Additionally, our observations revealed that rod c-Fos deficiency prior to phase I in NrlCre/+;c-fosf/f OIR retinas led to a significant reduction in VO when compared to control retinas (Fig. 2A). We also noted a decrease in blood vessel leakage in RhoiCre/+;c-fosf/f OIR mice lacking rod c-Fos (Fig. 2C). These results collectively suggest that the deletion of c-Fos expression in rod photoreceptor neurons inhibits the development of pathological NV and prevents retinal blood vessel leakage in OIR mice.
c-Fos directly regulated Adam17 transcription
As a transcription factor, c-Fos forms a heterodimer known as the AP-1 complex when it interacts with c-Jun protein, thereby regulating the transcription of target genes. To elucidate which target genes of c-fos in rod photoreceptors contribute to NV development, we collected retinas from wild type normal and OIR retinas at P14 and P17. These retinas were then subjected to CUT&Tag sequencing (CUT&Tag-seq), utilizing a c-Fos antibody (with IgG as control) as well as antibodies for H3K27ac as a marker for active enhancers, H3K4me3 as a maker for active promoters, and H3k27me3 as a marker for gene repression (Fig. 3A). Given that most c-Fos CUT&Tag peaks were enriched near the transcription start sites (TSS) (Supplemental Fig. 2), we focused our analysis on the region ± 1.0 kb from the TSS. In this context, we identified 3,482 genes and 3,956 genes that exhibited overlapping c-Fos peaks, H3K24ac peaks, and H3K4me3 peaks, while excluding H3K27me3 peaks near the TSS in normal P14 and OIR P14 retinas, respectively (Fig. 3B). Out of these, 1,771 c-Fos potential target genes were expressed in OIR P14 (Fig. 3B). Next, we extracted the transcriptome data for rod photoreceptors from the OIR scRNA-seq dataset (GSE150703). We conducted an analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), specifically comparing c-Fos positive and c-Fos negative rod photoreceptor cells. Our analysis identified 712 DEGs, particularly in OIR P14 (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, 64 of these 712 DEGs overlapped with the genes where c-Fos, H3K27ac, and H3K4me3 peaks coincided near the TSS in OIR P14 (Fig. 3B).
Among the 64 putative c-Fos targets in OIR P14 rod photoreceptor cells, a gene named a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (Adam17), also called tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme (TACE) is a shedding protease responsible for inflammation and angiogenesis [49]. Our genome browser analysis of CUT&Tag tracks revealed a c-Fos peak that precisely overlapped with H3K27ac and H3K4me3 peaks at the TSS of the Adam17 gene, while no such overlap with H3K27me3 peaks was observed at the TSS of Adam17 gene (Fig. 3C). Intriguingly, the 5’ flanking region from TSS to -1.1 kb upstream of the Adam17 gene contains a total of seven predicted AP-1 binding motifs (Fig. 3D), known to be essential sites for c-fos/c-Jun complex binding [50]. To dissect which of these AP-1 motifs were crucial for regulating the Adam17 gene, we subcloned the 5’ flanking region from TSS to -1.1 kb, along with all seven motifs, into a luciferase reporter plasmid. Subsequently, we created deletion mutation, including ∆0.8 K, ∆0.6 K, ∆0.5 K, and ∆0.3 K, by progressively deleting from TSS to -0.3 kb, from TSS to -0.5 kb, from - 0.5 kb to -1.1 kb, and from - 0.3 kb to -1.1 kb, respectively (Fig. 3D). The reporter assay indicated that 1.1 K, ∆0.5 K, and ∆0.3 K exhibited similar promoter activity, whereas ∆0.8 K and ∆0.6 K lost promoter activity. This finding emphasized the significance of the region from TSS to -0.3k, which contains a single half AP-1 motif, for Adam17 gene expression (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, a single nucleotide mutation of the AP-1 motif, changing TGAC to TTAC, within ∆0.3 K, abolished the enhancement of promoter activity by exogenous AP-1. This observation strongly suggests that c-Fos regulates Adam17 gene expression through the proximal AP-1 motif near the TSS (Fig. 3F).
Photoreceptor c-Fos regulated pathological NV through the Adam17-mediated pathways during OIR
In cellular context, Adam17 exists in two forms: an immature pro-form (pAdam17) and an active mature protease (mAdam17), responsible for its shedding activity [51]. Our in vitro findings suggest that Adam17 is transcriptionally regulated by c-Fos. To investigate whether Adam17 expression changes occur in vivo, we examined retina tissues. Remarkably, we observed that the deletion of c-Fos in photoreceptor cells resulted in decreased levels of both pAdam17 and mAdam17 in the OIR retina at P14 (Fig. 4A). Additionally, we confirmed this decrease of Adam17 expression in photoreceptor layer in OIR retinas through immunostaining (Fig. 4B). These results strongly indicated that Adam17 is a direct target of c-Fos. In photoreceptor specific c-fos deficient mice, the reduction of Adam17 expression leads to an unbalanced pAdam17 to mAdam17 ratio that could further decrease shedding activity of mAdam17.
Adam17 is a membrane bound shedding metalloprotease with a crucial role in cleaving cell surface proteins, including growth factors, cytokines, receptors, and cell adhesion molecules. It plays a pivotal role in intracellular signaling pathways related to inflammation and angiogenesis [52,53,54,55]. By analyzing a publicly available scRNA-seq (Drop-seq) dataset (GSE150703) that compared OIR and normal conditions [56], we observed an increase in Adam17 substrates in rod photoreceptor cells in OIR mice (Fig. 4C). These substrates are involved in various aspects of pathophysiology of ROP including angiogenesis, inflammation, and cell adhesion as well as migration (Fig. 4C) [57, 58]. In summary, our data suggest that the upregulation of c-Fos expression in rod photoreceptors leads to transcriptional regulation of Adam17. This regulation results in the release of angiogenic and pro-inflammatory molecules through Adam17’s shedding activities, ultimately, promoting pathological NV in OIR (Fig. 4D).
Furthermore, in a previously study [5], we demonstrated that inflammatory factors, including TNFα, IL-6, and VEGFA, are regulated by c-Fos in Vldlr−/− mice. To investigate whether these factors are also regulated by photoreceptor c-Fos in the OIR mouse model, we first examined the mRNA expression of these factors in whole retinas. Our findings revealed that rod c-Fos deficiency significantly reduced the induction of these factors during OIR compared to littermate control mice. Subsequently, we analyzed the peaks of c-Fos and histone markers using our CUT&Tag-seq data. However, no peaks of both c-Fos and active histone marker genes were identified within the promoter, enhancer, or gene body regions of these three factors (Supplemental Fig. 3). This suggests that these factors are indirectly regulated by c-Fos in the context of OIR.
Inhibition of photoreceptor c-Fos via AAV suppressed retinal NV, preserved retinal integrity, and improved visual function
The use of RNA interference for therapeutic purposes has gained traction [59], and the recombinant AAV has been effectively employed in gene transfer therapies for various conditions, including congenital blindness [60,61,62,63,64]. In this study, we identified elevated c-Fos levels in rod photoreceptor cells as a contributing factor for pathological NV in OIR mice. To explore the translational potential of this discovery, we utilized adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector carrying shRNA targeting c-fos and employed a subretinal delivery approach to specifically suppress c-fos expression in rod photoreceptors and chose the shRNA sequences against c-fos whose efficacy have been previously validated [5]. Promoters including the Nrl promoter [65] and a well-documented human rhodopsin kinase (hRK) promoter in AAV therapy [66] were used to drive the suppression of c-fos expression in photoreceptors (Fig. 5A). Subretinal injections of AAV were administered on P1 (Fig. 5B), followed by the induction of OIR from P7 to P12. Retinal samples were collected on P17 for NV and VO analysis (Fig. 5C). Remarkably, both AAV2-Nrl-shc-fos and AAV2-hRK-shc-fos injections significantly suppressed the development of pathological NV when compared to the scramble control (Fig. 5D, E). Additionally, AAV2-Nrl-shc-fos treatment in mice led to decreased VO (Fig. 5D). Notably, it is important to mention that AAV-mediated c-Fos inhibition in rod photoreceptor did not influence normal retinal vascular development and knockdown efficacy and specificity were validated (Supplemental Fig. 4).
To further assess the viral therapeutic potential of viral-mediated photoreceptor c-Fos inhibition in retinal angiogenesis, we examined the recovery of retinal thickness and visual function in OIR mice following AAV treatment. Retinal thickness was assessed and analyzed using InSight software (Phoenix) as we described previously [14]. The thickness of the retinal layer had decreased in OIR retinas (Fig. 5F). Interestingly, AAV2-hRK shc-fos treatment preserved the attenuated retinal layer thickness at P60, without affecting retinal layer thickness of normal eyes (Fig. 5F). Photoreceptor visual function was assessed using scotopic ERG in both normal and OIR mice. There were no differences between AAV2-hRK-shc-fos and control groups in photoreceptor sensitivity (Fig. 5G) regarding a-wave and b-wave in normal mice at P30 and P60. However, when evaluating the protection effects of AAV2-hRK-shc-fos in OIR mice (Fig. 5G), we observed that both a-wave and b-wave sensitivities had declined in OIR mice at P60, but not at P30. Remarkably, AAV2-hRK-shc-fos treatment reinstated the attenuated a- and b-wave sensitivities to normal levels, suggesting the protection role of c-Fos inhibition in photoreceptor function. In summary, these findings suggest that targeting c-fos through AAV inhibition holds promise as a potential therapeutic strategy for ROP.
Discussion
Proliferative blood vessel growth is the leading cause of blindness in vascular eye disease like ROP. It has been implicated that rod photoreceptors involved in ROP pathogenesis both in clinical research and animal models [16, 67, 68], but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In our current study, we have unveiled a novel mechanism involving the transcription factor c-Fos in rod photoreceptors, which plays a pivotal role in modulating pathological NV in the context of an OIR mouse model. First, we observed a significant upregulation and activation of c-Fos specifically in the photoreceptor layer during the initial stages of retina NV development. Second, we developed two distinct photoreceptor specific knockout mouse lines to investigate the precise role of photoreceptor c-Fos in controlling retinal NV. These models allowed us to delete c-Fos either before Phase I (utilizing Nrl-Cre) or before Phase II (employing Rho-iCre) of OIR progression. In both photoreceptor specific c-Fos knockout mice, the absence of c-Fos led to a significant reduction of retinal NV. This demonstrated the critical involvement of photoreceptor c-Fos in promoting pathological angiogenesis. In addition, deletion of photoreceptor c-Fos, especially before Phase I, also notably decreased VO, indicating the protection against vascular outgrowth by photoreceptor c-Fos early deficiency. Moreover, photoreceptor c-Fos deletion protected against blood vessel leakage compared to littermate control mice. Lastly, we identified Adam17 as a direct transcriptional target of c-Fos using CUT&Tag-seq and in vitro assays. Furthermore, we demonstrated a potential therapeutic approach for ROP by targeting photoreceptor c-Fos using AAV, emphasizing the clinical relevance of our finding. Together, our study established that photoreceptors play a crucial role in governing retinal NV through the c-Fos/Adam17 axis. These findings provided valuable insights into the intricate molecular mechanisms underlying pathological angiogenesis and hold promise for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for ROP.
Retinal photoreceptor neurons have recently emerged as key players in the regulation of retinal NV in vascular eye diseases. For example, photoreceptors produce soluble inflammatory factors and induce inflammatory changes in nearby cells in diabetes [2,3,4] to mediate diabetes-induced degeneration of retinal vessels. Photoreceptor c-Fos controls retinal angiogenesis by modulating inflammatory signals in Vldlr−/− mice [5], featuring neovascular aspect of human age-related macular degeneration [6,7,8,9,10]. However, whether photoreceptor neurons play any role in controlling ROP has not been reported yet. In this study, we demonstrated that photoreceptor neurons controlled retinal angiogenesis and inflammation via c-Fos by directly modulating the transcription of Adam17 that controls the cleavage of bioactive molecules in inflammation and angiogenesis such as cytokines and growth factors. This discovery has significant implications for our understanding of the pathophysiology of ROP as well as other vascular eye diseases and the development of novel therapeutic interventions.
There are two types of photoreceptor neurons: cones and rods. Cones develop early before birth; and rods are developed later than cones [69]. Multiple evidence in patients and animal studies have indicated the involvement of rod photoreceptor in the ROP pathology. It is known the age of onset of NV in ROP coincide with rod photoreceptor outer segment development [18, 70]. In animal models, it is reported that rod photoreceptors instigate the vascular abnormalities [67]. In clinical studies [71], ROP has fewer effects on the cone than on the rod responses, suggesting that cones are more resistant to the ROP disease process. The similar shape of the b-wave stimulus/response function in preterm infants and controls is evidence that ROP does not alter the balance of ON and OFF signals in the cone pathway [71]. Hence, ROP pathology likely originates from rod instead of cone photoreceptors. In this study, we used the rod photoreceptor specific promoter or Cre lines to generate rod-specific deficient mice to investigate the role of rod photoreceptors in controlling angiogenesis in ROP.
Systemic c-fos−/− mice display normal ocular and retinal morphology when not exposed to acute light pulses [22], suggesting that c-Fos may not be required for retinal function under physiological condition. c-fos is induced by darkness in photoreceptors and the absence of c-fos prevents light-induced apoptotic cell death of photoreceptors in retinal degeneration [22]. In Vldlr−/− mice, c-Fos is induced in photoreceptors and suppression of c-Fos inhibits retinal angiogenesis through suppression of inflammatory signals [5]. Our study showed that c-Fos is induced in the photoreceptor layer in the OIR mouse model and AAV targeted c-Fos inhibition with hRK promoter in rod photoreceptor didn’t influence the normal retinal vascular development.
Normally, the photoreceptor layer and the subretinal space are in an immune privilege zone in which adaptive immunity and inflammation are highly controlled [72, 73], maintained by immunosuppressive factors and characterized by a lack of immune cells and therefore, tolerance of foreign antigens [73, 74]. Eye diseases with pathological angiogenesis have a slow “para-inflammatory” response [75, 76] with changes in adaptive immune cells and macrophage infiltration violating the normal ocular environment. Loss of immune privilege may correlate with and increase NV [77, 78]. Inflammatory cytokines, including IL6, IL1β, TNFα, and TGFβ are produced by a variety of cell types, particularly macrophages and monocytes. Recent studies show that inflammatory signals from photoreceptors control retinal angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy [2,3,4] and Vldlr−/−model [5]. In this study, we assessed whether these inflammatory signals originate from photoreceptors to control NV in ROP mouse model via c-Fos. c-Fos is a transcription factor containing a consensus DNA element, TGA (C/G) TCA, defined as the 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-Responsive Element (TRE) [50, 79]. TREs serve as the binding platform for Fos and Jun family members [80]. Our published data [5] suggest that multiple inflammatory factors (TNFα, IL6, and VEGFA) are regulated in c-Fos-enriched retinas. We analyzed the proximal promoter sequences of these genes and found that all of them contain one or more potential TREs. In this study, we also observed the regulation of these inflammation factors by photoreceptor c-Fos. Therefore, we examined whether c-Fos can bind TREs on the promoters of TNFα, IL6, and VEGFA to directly control their expression in OIR retinas using our CUT&Tag sequencing dataset, but none of them are actively binding with c-Fos during NV, suggesting that photoreceptor c-Fos may regulate these factors indirectly.
Adam17 is a ubiquitously expressed protein in retina from P7, including ganglion cell layer, inner and outer plexiform layers, and photoreceptors [81], it is reported that its shedding activity is required for the retinal angiogenesis [82]. In the retinas of diabetic retinopathy patients and mouse model, the expression and enzymatic activity of Adam17 are upregulated, with its chemokines substrates such as CXCL16 and CX3CL1 [83, 84], and inactivation of endothelial Adam17 or its genetic inhibitor, the tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP3) ameliorates pathogenesis both in diabetic retinopathy and retinal ischemia reperfusion [83, 85,86,87], indicating an important role of Adam17 in vascular ocular pathologies. As a shedding enzyme, Adam17 have a broad spectrum of substrates involve in cytokines production, cell-cell communication and signaling receptors cleavage, play important roles in inflammation, angiogenesis, cell adhesion and migration [88,89,90]. We utilized a published scRNA-seq dataset to demonstrate the increased presence of Adam17 substrates in photoreceptors of OIR mice. These substrates were found to predominantly govern inflammation, angiogenesis, and cell adhesion/migration, which are known to be the contributing factors to the ROP pathology. Nevertheless, it remains to be determined whether these substrates also play a role in retinal angiogenesis independently of the shedding activity of Adam17. Furthermore, we identified Adam17 as a direct transcriptional target of c-Fos in retinal photoreceptor neurons and both pro- and active- form of Adam17 were reduced in photoreceptor specific c-Fos deficient retinas during OIR. These findings suggest that photoreceptors may control pathological retinal angiogenesis potentially through a novel pathway involving c-Fos/Adam17 pathway. However, the direct targeting of Adam17 as a contributor to c-Fos-mediated pathological retinal angiogenesis remains inconclusive. Additional experiments are required to explore the interaction between c-Fos and Adam17. For instance, investigating whether the absence of Adam17 can mitigate c-Fos-induced pathological retinal angiogenesis and studying the impacts of Adam17 inhibition on the activation/shedding of molecules such as Tnf, Il6, Vegfa, and other inflammatory factors during pathological NV in an OIR mouse model. How those substrates of Adam17 are regulated by c-Fos/Adam17 axis in photoreceptors during OIR also need to be further studied.
In this study, we have uncovered significant insights into the role of transcription factors, particularly their upregulation in rod photoreceptors in OIR mice. Through targeted ablation of c-Fos specifically in rods, we successfully inhibited the pathological angiogenesis observed in the OIR retina. Our investigation also delved into the intricate mechanistic details, revealing that c-Fos acts as a pivotal regulator of Adam17, an enzyme responsible for cleaving bioactive molecules associated with inflammation, angiogenesis, and cell adhesion and migration. This regulatory pathway was found to contribute significantly to the development of pathological NV in OIR mice. Expanding upon our discoveries, we conducted translational research, demonstrating that the selective c-Fos inhibition by AAV rod photoreceptors could effectively suppress pathological NV and, importantly, enhance visual outcomes in mice. These findings not only advance our understanding of retinal vascular diseases but also offer a paradigm shift by emphasizing the active role of photoreceptor neurons in controlling retinal NV in vascular eye diseases. This newfound perspective underscores the intricate interplay between neuronal and vascular components within the retina and opens exciting possibilities for the development of innovative, precisely targeted treatments. Ultimately, this research holds immense potential to revolutionize the management of retinal vascular diseases, ultimately benefiting countless individuals at risk of vision loss.
Data availability
All the data supporting the conclusions of this study are included within the article and supplementary data. All the other data and materials are available upon request to the corresponding author. The CUT&Tag-seq dataset is deposited to the Genome Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession numbers (GSE245456).
References
Malhotra H, Barnes CL, Calvert PD (2021) Functional compartmentalization of photoreceptor neurons, (in eng), Pflugers Archiv: European journal of physiology, vol. 473, no. 9, pp. 1493–1516, Sep https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-021-02558-7
Tonade D, Liu H, Kern TS (2016) Photoreceptor Cells Produce Inflammatory Mediators That Contribute to Endothelial Cell Death in Diabetes, (in eng), Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 4264-71, Aug 1 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19859
Tonade D, Liu H, Palczewski K, Kern TS (2017) Photoreceptor cells produce inflammatory products that contribute to retinal vascular permeability in a mouse model of diabetes, (in eng), Diabetologia, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2111–2120, Oct https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4381-5
Du Y, Veenstra A, Palczewski K, Kern TS (2013) Photoreceptor cells are major contributors to diabetes-induced oxidative stress and local inflammation in the retina, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 41, pp. 16586–16591, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314575110
Sun Y et al (Jun 5 2017) Inflammatory signals from photoreceptor modulate pathological retinal angiogenesis via c-Fos, (in eng). J Exp Med 214:1753–1767. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20161645
Heckenlively JR et al Mouse model of subretinal neovascularization with choroidal anastomosis, Retina, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 518 – 22, Aug 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12972764
Li C et al (Jun 2007) Biochemical alterations in the retinas of very low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice: an animal model of retinal angiomatous proliferation. Arch Ophthalmol 125:795–803. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.6.795
Dorrell MI et al (2009) Antioxidant or neurotrophic factor treatment preserves function in a mouse model of neovascularization-associated oxidative stress, The Journal of clinical investigation, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 611 – 23, Mar https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI35977
Chen Y, Hu Y, Moiseyev G, Zhou KK, Chen D, Ma JX (2009) Photoreceptor degeneration and retinal inflammation induced by very low-density lipoprotein receptor deficiency, Microvasc Res, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 119 – 27, Jun https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2009.02.005
Joyal JS et al (2016) Retinal lipid and glucose metabolism dictates angiogenesis through the lipid sensor Ffar1. Nat Med Mar 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4059
Smith LE et al Oxygen-induced retinopathy in the mouse, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 101 – 11, Jan 1994. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=7507904
Stahl A et al (Jun 2010) The mouse retina as an angiogenesis model. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(6):2813–2826. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5176
Connor KM et al (2009) Quantification of oxygen-induced retinopathy in the mouse: a model of vessel loss, vessel regrowth and pathological angiogenesis, Nat Protoc, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1565-73, [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19816419
Sun Y et al (2015) SOCS3 in retinal neurons and glial cells suppresses VEGF signaling to prevent pathological neovascular growth, (in eng), Science signaling, vol. 8, no. 395, p. ra94, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aaa8695
Athikarisamy SE, Lam GC, Cooper MN, Strunk T (2023) Retinopathy of prematurity and placental histopathology findings: a retrospective cohort study. Front Pead 11:1099614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1099614. (in eng)
Hansen RM, Moskowitz A, Akula JD, Fulton AB (2017) The neural retina in retinopathy of prematurity, (in eng), Progress in retinal and eye research, vol. 56, pp. 32–57, Jan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.09.004
Palmer EA et al Incidence and early course of retinopathy of prematurity. The Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group, Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 1628-40, Nov 1991. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1800923
Fulton AB, Dodge J, Hansen RM, Williams TP (1999) The rhodopsin content of human eyes, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1878-83, Jul [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10393065
Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Petersen RA, Vanderveen DK (2001) The rod photoreceptors in retinopathy of Prematurity: an Electroretinographic Study. Arch Ophthalmol 119(4):499–505. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.4.499
Lahdenranta J et al (Aug 28 2001) An anti-angiogenic state in mice and humans with retinal photoreceptor cell degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10368–10373. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181329198
Curran T, Franza BR Jr. Fos and Jun: the AP-1 connection, Cell, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 395-7, Nov 4 1988. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3141060
Hafezi F et al (1997) The absence of c-fos prevents light-induced apoptotic cell death of photoreceptors in retinal degeneration in vivo, Nat Med, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 346-9, Mar [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9055866
Hoffman GE, Smith MS, Verbalis JG (Jul 1993) c-Fos and related immediate early gene products as markers of activity in neuroendocrine systems. Front Neuroendocrinol 14(3):173–213. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.1993.1006
Aikawa Y et al (2008) Treatment of arthritis with a selective inhibitor of c-Fos/activator protein-1, Nat Biotechnol, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 817 – 23, Jul https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1412
Shiozawa S, Tsumiyama K Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and c-Fos/AP-1. Cell Cycle, 8, 10, pp. 1539–1543, May 15 2009, https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.10.8411
Muller R, Bravo R, Burckhardt J, Curran T Induction of c-fos gene and protein by growth factors precedes activation of c-myc, Nature, vol. 312, no. 5996, pp. 716 – 20, Dec 20-1985 Jan 2 1984. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6334806
Yu MC, Li WW, Liu K, Yew DT An immunohistochemical study of the c-fos protooncogene in the developing human retina, Neuroscience, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 983-7, Jun 1994. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7936216
Sun Y, et al (2015) Nuclear receptor RORalpha regulates pathologic retinal angiogenesis by modulating SOCS3-dependent inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(33):10401–6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26243880
Stahl A et al (2010) Postnatal weight gain modifies severity and functional outcome of oxygen-induced proliferative retinopathy, (in eng), The American journal of pathology, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t vol. 177, no. 6, pp. 2715-23, Dec https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.100526
Park YK, Park SM, Choi YC, Lee D, Won M, Kim YJ AsiDesigner: exon-based siRNA design server considering alternative splicing, Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 36, no. Web Server issue, pp. W97-103, Jul 1 2008, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn280
Grieger JC, Choi VW, Samulski RJ (2006) Production and characterization of adeno-associated viral vectors. Nat Protoc 1(3):1412–1428. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.207
Vandenberghe LH, Xiao R, Lock M, Lin J, Korn M, Wilson JM (Oct 2010) Efficient serotype-dependent release of functional vector into the culture medium during adeno-associated virus manufacturing. Hum Gene Ther 21(10):1251–1257. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2010.107
Matsuda T, Cepko CL (Jan 6 2004) Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(1):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235688100
Wang S, Sengel C, Emerson MM, Cepko CL (2014) A gene regulatory network controls the binary fate decision of rod and bipolar cells in the vertebrate retina, Developmental cell, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 513 – 27, Sep 8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.07.018
Zhang N et al (Dec 2013) The rat with oxygen-induced retinopathy is myopic with low retinal dopamine. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(13):8275–8284. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12544
Hood DC, Birch DG Rod phototransduction in retinitis pigmentosa: estimation and interpretation of parameters derived from the rod a-wave, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 2948-61, Jun 1994. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8206712
Pugh EN Jr., Lamb TD Amplification and kinetics of the activation steps in phototransduction, Biochim Biophys Acta, vol. 1141, no. 2–3, pp. 111 – 49, Mar 1 1993. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8382952
Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr. A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors, J Physiol, vol. 449, pp. 719 – 58, Apr 1992. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1326052
Kaya-Okur HS et al (1930) CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells, Nat Commun, vol. 10, no. 1, p. Apr 29 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09982-5
Suryatenggara J, Yong KJ, Tenen DE, Tenen DG, Bassal MA (Jan 17 2022) ChIP-AP: an integrated analysis pipeline for unbiased ChIP-seq analysis. Brief Bioinform 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab537
Monje P, Marinissen MJ, Gutkind JS (Oct 2003) Phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal transactivation domain of c-Fos by extracellular signal-regulated kinase mediates the transcriptional activation of AP-1 and cellular transformation induced by platelet-derived growth factor. Mol Cell Biol 23(19):7030–7043. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.19.7030-7043.2003
Bonezzi PJ, Stabio ME, Renna JM (May 2018) The development of Mid-wavelength Photoresponsivity in the Mouse Retina. Curr Eye Res 43(5):666–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2018.1433859
Bassett EA, Wallace VA (2012) Cell fate determination in the vertebrate retina, Trends Neurosci, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 565 – 73, Sep https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.05.004
Li S., Chen D., Sauve Y., McCandless J., Chen Y. J., Chen C. K. (Feb 2005) Rhodopsin-icre transgenic mouse line for cre-mediated rod-specific gene targeting. Genesis 41(2):pp73–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/gene.20097
Brightman DS, Razafsky D, Potter C, Hodzic D, Chen S (2016) Nrl-Cre transgenic mouse mediates loxP recombination in developing rod photoreceptors, Genesis, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 129 – 35, Mar https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22918
Zhang J, Zhang D, McQuade JS, Behbehani M, Tsien JZ, Xu M (Apr 2002) c-fos regulates neuronal excitability and survival. Nat Genet 30(4):416–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng859
Zhang J et al (2006) c-Fos facilitates the acquisition and extinction of cocaine-induced persistent changes. J Neurosci 26(51):13287–13296 Dec 20. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3795-06.2006
Shimshek DR et al Codon-improved Cre recombinase (iCre) expression in the mouse, Genesis, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 19–26, Jan 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11835670
Wang K, Xuan Z, Liu X, Zheng M, Yang C, Wang H (2022) Immunomodulatory role of metalloproteinase ADAM17 in tumor development, (in eng). 13:1059376. Frontiers in immunology10.3389/fimmu.2022.1059376
Angel P et al Phorbol ester-inducible genes contain a common cis element recognized by a TPA-modulated trans-acting factor, (in eng), Cell, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 729 – 39, Jun 19 1987, https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90611-8
Lorenzen I et al (2016) Control of ADAM17 activity by regulation of its cellular localisation, (in eng), Scientific reports, vol. 6, p. 35067, Oct 12 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35067
Scheller J, Chalaris A, Garbers C, Rose-John S (2011) ADAM17: a molecular switch to control inflammation and tissue regeneration, (in eng), Trends in immunology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 380-7, Aug https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2011.05.005
Zunke F, Rose-John S The shedding protease ADAM17: Physiology and pathophysiology, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1864, no. 11, Part B, pp. 2059–2070, 2017/11/01/ 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.07.001
Saad MI, Jenkins BJ (2023) The protease ADAM17 at the crossroads of disease: revisiting its significance in inflammation, cancer, and beyond, (in eng). FEBS J Aug 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.16923
Fan D et al (2015) Cardiomyocyte A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase 17 (ADAM17) Is Essential in Post-Myocardial Infarction Repair by Regulating Angiogenesis, (in eng), Circulation. Heart failure, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 970-9, Sep https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.114.002029
Binet F et al (2020) Neutrophil extracellular traps target senescent vasculature for tissue remodeling in retinopathy, (in eng), Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 369, no. 6506, Aug 21 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5356
Rivera JC et al (2011) Understanding retinopathy of prematurity: update on pathogenesis, (in eng), Neonatology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 343 – 53, https://doi.org/10.1159/000330174
Hartnett ME (2023) Pathophysiology of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Annual Review of Vision Science, /09/15 2023, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-093022-021420
Borel F, Kay MA, Mueller C (Apr 2014) Recombinant AAV as a platform for translating the therapeutic potential of RNA interference. Mol Ther 22(4):692–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2013.285
Valdmanis PN, Kay MA (Apr 2017) Future of rAAV Gene Therapy: platform for RNAi, Gene Editing, and Beyond. Hum Gene Ther 28(4):361–372. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2016.171
O’Reilly M et al (2007) RNA interference-mediated suppression and replacement of human rhodopsin in vivo, Am J Hum Genet, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 127 – 35, Jul https://doi.org/10.1086/519025
Tam LC et al (2008) Therapeutic benefit derived from RNAi-mediated ablation of IMPDH1 transcripts in a murine model of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP10), Hum Mol Genet, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 2084 – 100, Jul 15 https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn107
Maguire AM et al (2009) Age-dependent effects of RPE65 gene therapy for Leber’s congenital amaurosis: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial, Lancet, vol. 374, no. 9701, pp. 1597 – 605, Nov 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61836-5
Cideciyan AV et al (Aug 13 2009) Vision 1 year after gene therapy for Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med 361(7):725–727. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc0903652
Matsuda T, Cepko CL (Jan 16 2007) Controlled expression of transgenes introduced by in vivo electroporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(3):1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610155104
Khani SC et al (Sep 2007) AAV-mediated expression targeting of rod and cone photoreceptors with a human rhodopsin kinase promoter. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(9):3954–3961. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0257
Akula JD, Hansen RM, Martinez-Perez ME, Fulton AB (2007) Rod photoreceptor function predicts blood vessel abnormality in retinopathy of prematurity, (in eng), Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 4351-9, Sep https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0204
Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Petersen RA, Vanderveen DK (2001) The rod photoreceptors in retinopathy of prematurity: an electroretinographic study, Archives of ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 499–505, Apr [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11296015
Cepko CL The determination of Rod and cone photoreceptor fate. Annu Rev Vis Sci, 1, pp. 211–234, Nov 24 2015, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-090814-121657
Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Moskowitz A, Akula JD (2009) The neurovascular retina in retinopathy of prematurity, (in eng), Progress in retinal and eye research. 6 pp 452 – 82 Nov 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.06.003
Fulton AB, Hansen RM, Moskowitz A (Feb 2008) The cone electroretinogram in retinopathy of prematurity. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(2):814–819. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1226
Streilein JW, Ohta K, Mo JS, Taylor AW (pp. 453–9, May-Jun 2002) Ocular immune privilege and the impact of intraocular inflammation. DNA Cell Biol 21:5–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/10445490260099746
Masli S, Vega JL (2011) Ocular immune privilege sites, Methods Mol Biol, vol. 677, pp. 449 – 58, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-869-0_28
Streilein JW (1995) Immunological non-responsiveness and acquisition of tolerance in relation to immune privilege in the eye, Eye, vol. 9 (Pt 2), pp. 236 – 40, https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1995.46
Perez VL, Caspi RR Immune mechanisms in inflammatory and degenerative eye disease. Trends Immunol, 36, 6, pp. 354 – 63, Jun 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2015.04.003
Medzhitov R (2008) Origin and physiological roles of inflammation, Nature, vol. 454, no. 7203, pp. 428 – 35, Jul 24 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07201
Apte RS, Richter J, Herndon J, Ferguson TA (Aug 2006) Macrophages inhibit neovascularization in a murine model of age-related macular degeneration. PLoS Med 3(8):e310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030310
Roychoudhury J, Herndon JM, Yin J, Apte RS, Ferguson TA (Jul 2010) Targeting immune privilege to prevent pathogenic neovascularization. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(7):3560–3566. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3890
Angel P, Karin M The role of Jun, Fos and the AP-1 complex in cell-proliferation and transformation, Biochim Biophys Acta, vol. 1072, no. 2–3, pp. 129 – 57, Dec 10 1991. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1751545
Wang WM, Wu SY, Lee AY, Chiang CM (Nov 25 2011) Binding site specificity and factor redundancy in activator protein-1-driven human papillomavirus chromatin-dependent transcription. J Biol Chem 286(47):40974–40986. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.290874
Toonen JA, Ronchetti A, Sidjanin DJ, Disintegrin A (2016) Metalloproteinase10 (ADAM10) regulates NOTCH Signaling during early Retinal Development, (in eng). PLoS ONE 11(5):e0156184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156184
Caolo V et al (2015) ADAM10 and ADAM17 have opposite roles during sprouting angiogenesis, (in eng), Angiogenesis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 13–22, Jan https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-014-9443-4
Shalaby L et al Role of Endothelial ADAM17 in Early Vascular Changes Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy, Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 400, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/2/400
Abu El-Asrar AM et al (2020) Evaluation of Proteoforms of the transmembrane chemokines CXCL16 and CX3CL1, their receptors, and their Processing metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 in proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, (in eng). Front Immunol 11:601639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.601639
Gutsaeva DR et al (Jul 29 2020) Inactivation of endothelial ADAM17 reduces retinal ischemia-reperfusion Induced neuronal and vascular damage, (in eng). Int J Mol Sci 21(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155379
Hewing NJ et al (2013) Intravitreal injection of TIMP3 or the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib offers protection from oxygen-induced retinopathy in mice, (in eng), Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 864 – 70, Jan 30 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10954
Abu El-Asrar AM et al (2021) Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-3 Ameliorates Diabetes-Induced Retinal Inflammation, (in eng), Frontiers in physiology, vol. 12, p. 807747, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.807747
Calligaris M et al Strategies to Target ADAM17 in Disease: From Its Discovery to the iRhom Revolution, Molecules, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 944, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/4/944
Göőz P, Göőz M, Baldys A, Hoffman S ADAM-17 regulates endothelial cell morphology, proliferation, and in vitro angiogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 380, 1, pp. 33–38, 2009/02/27/ 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.013
Buchanan PC et al (Apr 14 2017) Ectodomain shedding of the cell adhesion molecule Nectin-4 in ovarian cancer is mediated by ADAM10 and ADAM17, (in eng). J Biol Chem 292:6339–6351. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.746859
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Lois E.H. Smith for her advice on ROP treatment and critical review of the manuscript. We thank Dr. James Akula for his technical supports for electroretinography. We thank Dr. Shiming Chen for kindly providing the Nrl-Cre mouse line. We thank the IDDRC Cellular Imaging Core, funded by NIH P50 HD105351 and NIH S10D030322. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute (R01EY030140, R01EY029238), BrightFocus Foundation, Boston Children’s Hospital Pilot Fund, Mass Lions Eye Foundation, and Children’s Hospital Ophthalmology Foundation for YS; National Institutes of Health (R01HL146128) for SK; National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute (U24EY029893) and Gilbert Family Foundation for PB; Knight Templar Eye Foundation for TW.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.W., T.W., S.K., and Y.S. designed experiments; X.W., T.W., S.K., M.S., J.C., E.L., A.G., and X.W. conducted experiments; X. W., T.W., S.K., E.K., P.B., and Y.S. analyzed the data; A.F-G, S.A.M., S.K. contributed oxygen chamber and technical support; X.W. and Y.S. wrote the manuscript; Y.S. and S.K. acquired funding. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Y.S. and T.W. are inventors on patent applications filed by Boston Children’s Hospital. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Wang, T., Kaneko, S. et al. Photoreceptors inhibit pathological retinal angiogenesis through transcriptional regulation of Adam17 via c-Fos. Angiogenesis 27, 379–395 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-024-09912-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-024-09912-0