Introduction

Fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) is a newly emerged technology directed toward noninvasive, quantitative, three-dimensional (3D) imaging of internal distribution of fluorescence markers in vivo.16, 21, 22 It opens an exciting route to 3D imaging and visualization of disease pathogenesis,2, 4, 8, 9, 24 drug development,28 and therapeutic response19, 20, 23 in small animals.

During the last decade, FMT systems have been evolved over several generations. The early fiber-based FMT system suffers from a compromised dataset and a highly ill-posed inverse problem due to the small number of optical fibers employed.25 A mechanical raster scanning based parallel-plate (slab) imaging geometry is developed to achieve a higher spatial photon sampling. However, it still has compromised resolution along the axis perpendicular to the detector plane due to the limited projection angles.7, 27 Besides, in order to minimize photon wave mismatches, matching fluids are utilized in these two types of systems, which add complexity and unstability to the setup. Recent advance in FMT is the non-contact full-angle tomography system. It can achieve high spatial sampling of photons propagating through tissue offered by full-angle projection measurements and simplify experimental setups since no matching fluids are utilized and no fibers are brought in to contact with the imaged object.3, 10, 17 However, optical fibers or laser beams employed in these systems as the light source mainly work in a point excitation pattern, which can only excite a limited volume and acquire fluorescent signals from a local region of the animal body. Fluorescent targets distributed in other volumes of interest may be potentially missed. As a result, the studies of non-contact full-angle FMT in small animal imaging are limited to a local region, such as the mouse lungs,2 spleen,5 brain,11 thymus,17 respectively, and the applications in imaging whole-body fluorescent targets distributions have been restricted. To provide a whole-body simultaneous imaging performance in non-contact full-angle FMT system, a kind of parallel excitation pattern including line excitation and area excitation has been proposed by Wang et al. 33 In their reports, they mainly focused on the theoretical analysis of optimal imaging parameters of FMT. Although it was helpful in guiding the design of FMT system with parallel excitation, most of the work was conducted under numerical simulation studies.

In this article, we implement a FMT system designed for imaging whole-body distribution of fluorescent markers in small animals based on a line-shaped parallel excitation pattern. The parallel excitation pattern can excite an extended domain on the imaged object and then provide extended spatial sampling dataset to reconstruct multiple fluorescent targets distributed in whole animal body simultaneously during one full-angle FMT imaging process. The fluorescent marker we employed, indocyanine green (ICG), is a widely used optical fluorophore in the near-infrared (NIR) range for small animal1, 35 and human cancer imaging.6, 14, 18 A series of phantom experiments were performed to evaluate the key parameters of this system. The capacity of quantitation linearity was assessed with glass tube containing different ICG concentrations in a cylinder phantom. The accessible simultaneous imaging domain was illustrated by two fluorescent tubes placed at different positions of the glass cylinder. Furthermore, animal experiment with two fluorescent targets implanted in the torso of a nude mouse was conducted to demonstrate the performance of this system to localize and quantify whole-body fluorescent distributions in vivo. The experimental results suggest that the proposed system can achieve a whole-body simultaneous imaging domain and has the advantage of imaging complete dynamic physiological processes in vivo compared with conventional single point excitation FMT system.

This article is structured as follows: we first give a detailed description of the system setup and a brief introduction to the reconstruction algorithm. Then the key performances of this system are evaluated by a series of phantom and in vivo experiments. Finally, the major advantage, application potential of the proposed system and future work are discussed.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Setup

We have developed a non-contact full-angle FMT system for simultaneous imaging of whole-body distribution of fluorescent markers in small animals. The system mainly contains three modules, as shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Experimental setup of the parallel excitation based FMT system

The Excitation Module

The excitation module consists of the light source, the excitation filter, and the excitation fiber. A 250 W Halogen lamp (i) (7ILT250, 7-star, Beijing, China), with wavelength range from 300 to 2500 nm is employed as the excitation light source. Since ICG is employed as the fluorescent marker in the following studies, a band pass excitation filter (ii) (FF01-775/46-25, Semrock, Rochester, NY, USA) with a center wavelength of 775 nm, full width half maximum (FWHM) of 46 nm is used in front of the Halogen lamp. The excitation light which travels through the filter is coupled with a special optical fiber (iii), which is the core component of this system. One end of the fiber facing the Halogen lamp is circular in shape as usual, while the other end toward the imaged object is rectangular in shape. The output of the rectangular end is a line-shaped beam along Z axis. The line-shaped excitation beam has a maximum length of 4 cm and the light intensity distribution along the length of the beam is designed to be uniform. An adjustable slit (iv) is used to control the width of the excitation beam and cut off light with large diverse angles.

The Full-Angle Rotation Module

Full-angle projection measurements are implemented by a 360° rotation stage (v). The imaged animal is suspended by a home-made holder, consists of four clips that fasten the animal’s extremities and fix the animal onto the rotation stage. The stage allows rotation of the object around its longitudinal axis (Z axis) for full-angle projection acquisitions, with a resolution of 0.0025° and repeatability error <0.01°. The rotation parameters such as speed, direction, and rotation steps can be manipulated by a motor controller. The typical rotation speed is set to 6°/s to avoid skew and internal organs movement. The experimental animal is anesthetized by an isoflurane veterinary vaporizer (VMR, Matrx, NY, USA) during in vivo imaging process.

The Acquisition Module

The FMT data is acquired by a −70 °C, high frame rate electron multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera (vi) (iXon DU-897, Andor Technologies, Belfast, Northern Ireland) placed on the opposite side of the imaged object. A 60 mm f/2.8 imaging lens (vii) (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA) is coupled to EMCCD. For ICG fluorescence detection, a band pass emission filter (viii) (FF01-840/12-25, Semrock, Rochester, NY, USA) with a center wavelength of 840 nm, FWHM of 12 nm is employed in front of the EMCCD camera. Additional excitation and emission filter pairs for other fluorescent markers at different spectral bands have been added in this system but are not referred to herein.

The entire experimental procedure such as rotation control and data acquisition is manipulated by a 2.4 GHz 32 bit PC (ix) with self-designed software developed under the LABWINDOWS environment.

Imaging Protocol

In our experiment, the length of the line-shaped parallel excitation beam was set to 4 cm and the width of the excitation beam was set to about 0.1 cm, considering that the excitation light should be efficient enough to excite the whole imaged object while avoid transmitting to CCD directly without interacting with the object. After fixing an imaged object on the rotation stage, full-angle FMT was performed with the rotation stage working under a step-by-step mode.

The fluorescence images were acquired typically utilizing 36 projections every 10°, with the corresponding filters mentioned in experimental setups. The excitation light images were acquired under the same conditions except for the fluorescence filter replaced by a neutral density filter (Daheng, Beijing, China) with 1% light transmittance for normalized Born approximation.32 72 white light images were collected using an incandescent lamp instead of the excitation source, to recover the 3D surface of the imaged object.34 The typical EMCCD field of view (FOV) was about 7 × 7 cm2 in this article.

Reconstruction Algorithm

FMT reconstruction is performed for localization and quantification of fluorescence markers in imaged object. In highly scattering tissue medium, the photon propagation can be modeled using the diffusion equation coupled with Robin-type boundary condition.30 For a continuous wave (CW) source term S(r), the Green’s function G(r), which describes the photon propagation field, can be presented as follows:

$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{ll} { - \nabla \cdot [D(r)\nabla G(r)] \, + \mu_{\text{a}} (r)G(r) = S(r)} & {r \in \Upomega } \\ {2qD(r){\frac{\partial G(r)}{{\partial \vec{n}}}} + G(r) = 0} & {r \in \partial \Upomega } \\ \end{array} } \right.,$$
(1)

where \( D(r)=1/(3 \mu_{\rm s}^{\prime}(r))\) is the diffusion coefficient at position r. \( \mu_{\rm s}^{\prime} (r) \) is the reduced scattering coefficient and μa(r) is the absorption coefficient. Ω is the domain of the imaged object with a boundary of ∂Ω. q is a constant depending on the optical refractive index mismatch on the boundary and \( \vec{n} \) denotes the outward normal vector of the boundary ∂Ω. A collimated point source spot can be modeled as an isotropic source S(r) = δ(r − r s), where r s is the point one transport mean free path \( \hbox{ltr}=1/\mu_{\rm s}^{\prime}(r)\) into the medium from the illumination spot.30 In analogy, a uniform line-shaped excitation source term employed in the proposed system is modeled as:

$$ L(r): = \left\{ {\begin{array}{ll} {L(r) = 1/L} & {r \in \{ r_{\text{l}} \} } \\ {L(r) = 0} & {r \,\notin \,\{ r_{\text{l}} \} } \\ \end{array} } \right.,$$
(2)

where {r l} denotes a line one transport mean free path into the medium from the central axis of the narrow beam with a length of L. In practical implementation, L(r) is defined linear to intensity profile with \( \int_{{\{ r_{\text{l}} \} }} {L(r)dr} = 1. \) If knowing the optical properties, the Green’s function G(r) can be obtained by solving Eq. (1) using finite element method.13, 31 Given Green’s functions, the measured fluorescence signal at detector point r d can be expressed as26:

$$ U_{\text{m}} (r_{\text{d}} ) = \int_{V} {G_{{\delta (r - r_{\text{d}} )}}^{{\lambda_{\text{fl}} }} (r_{\text{p}} )n(r_{\text{p}} )\Upphi_{{\{ r_{\text{l}} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} (r_{\text{p}} )} dr_{\text{p}} , $$
(3)

where r p is the point inside the volume V considered for reconstruction. n(r p) = ημaxf(r p) denotes the fluorescence yield at r p, with η being the quantum efficiency and μaxf being the absorption coefficient of the fluorophore. In general, the fluorescence yield is proportional to the fluorochrome concentration. \( G_{{\delta (r - r_{\text{d}} )}}^{{\lambda_{\text{fl}} }} (r_{\text{p}} ) \) denotes the Green’s function value at r p due to a point source δ(r − r d) at the fluorescence wavelength, and \( \Upphi_{{\{ r_{\rm l} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} \) denotes the spatial distribution of excitation light due to a line-shaped excitation source L(r) along {r l}. Assuming identical optical properties at both excitation and emission wavelength, the photon density \( \Upphi_{{\{ r_{\rm l} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} \) is modeled using the same Green’s functions as U m. The measured excitation signal at detector point r d can be expressed as:

$$ U_{x} (r_{\text{d}} ) = G_{{\{ r_{\rm l} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} (r_{\text{d}} ), $$
(4)

where \( G_{{\{ r_{\rm l} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} (r_{\text{d}} ) \) denotes the Green’s function value at r d due to a line-shaped excitation source L(r) along {r l} at the excitation wavelength. To reduce the influence of tissue heterogeneity, normalized Born method is employed.32 By dividing Eq. (3) with Eq. (4), the normalized ratio U m(r d)/U x (r d) of the measured fluorescence signal and corresponding excitation signal at detector point r d can be expressed as follows:

$$ {\frac{{U_{\text{m}} (r_{\text{d}} )}}{{U_{x} (r_{\text{d}} )}}} = \Uptheta {\frac{{\int_{V} {G_{{\delta (r - r_{\text{d}} )}}^{{\lambda_{\text{fl}} }} (r_{\text{p}} )n(r_{\text{p}} )} G_{{\{ r_{\text{l}} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} (r_{\text{p}} )dr}}{{G_{{\{ r_{\text{l}} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} (r_{\text{d}} )}}}, $$
(5)

where the Green’s function \( G_{{\{ r_{\rm l} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} \) at the excitation wavelength has replaced \( \Upphi_{{\{ r_{\rm l} \} }}^{{\lambda_{\text{exc}} }} \) in Eq. (3), and a unitless calibration factor Θ is added to account for the amplification and attenuation factors of the system. When the volume V is discretized into voxels, a linear relation between the normalized vector U m/U x and the unknown fluorescence yield vector n is generated as follows:

$$ {\frac{{U_{\text{m}} }}{{U_{x} }}} = {\mathbf{W}}n. $$
(6)

In the weight matrix W, each element w ij means the contribution of jth voxel of the discrete field of interest (FOI) to the measurement due to the ith source-detector pair. The unknown fluorescence yield vector n is reconstructed by solving the linear system using algebraic reconstruction technique (ART). In our studies, the reconstructions were terminated after 300 ART iterations. The actual computation time on our personal computer (Intel Core TMi5 processor and 8 GB RAM) for a weight matrix W with 108 elements was approximate 1.1 min. As the computation time is linear to the number of elements in the weight matrix W, for W with other sizes, the computation time can be approximately estimated.

Results

Quantification Linearity

A 2.5-cm diameter glass cylinder containing 1% intralipid was employed as the phantom, with an absorption coefficient of μa = 0.02 cm−1 and a reduced scattering coefficient of \( \mu_{\rm s}^{\prime} = 10.0\,\hbox{cm}^{-1}.\) The cylinder was fixed on the rotation stage and the bottom was set to Z = 0.0 cm. The quantification linearity of the system was validated by a transparent glass tube (0.4-cm diameter) containing fluorescent markers inserted into the cylinder. The tube was sequentially filled with different concentrations of ICG and corresponding FMT dataset was acquired subsequently. The experimental configuration is shown in Fig. 2a.

Figure 2
figure 2

Phantom experiments for evaluating the quantification linearity of the system. (a) The top view and side view of the experimental configuration. A glass tube (0.4-cm diameter) sequentially filled with seven different concentrations (13 nM, 102 nM, 203 nM, 406 nM, 813 nM, 1.625 μM, and 3.25 μM) of ICG was inserted in a 2.5-cm diameter cylinder phantom. The blue point in the top view and the blue line in the side view both indicate the line-shaped parallel excitation source. (b) The average reconstructed fluorescence intensities as a function of actual ICG concentrations. Blue solid line, linear fit (R 2 = 0.993). (c) The reconstructed images corresponding to the lowest (13 nM) and highest (3.25 μM) ICG concentrations, respectively, taken at slice Z = 3.8 cm. The reconstructed fluorescence intensities are normalized by the maximum of the reconstructed results. The red curves on the cross section images represent the phantom boundary, and the small white circles indicate the actual position of the tube

Average reconstructed fluorescence intensities were extracted from the region of interests (ROI) encompassing the fluorescent tube and then plotted as a function of actual ICG concentrations, as shown in Fig. 2b. The data demonstrates that the proposed system has a sensitivity of 13 nM concentration (260 fmole) of ICG and provides a good linear response from 13 nM to 3.25 μM of the fluorescent marker. Figure 2c depicts two cross section slices taken at the middle of the tubes, representing the reconstructed results of the lowest (13 nM) and highest (3.25 μM) ICG concentrations, respectively. Both tubes with a concentration difference of two orders of magnitude of ICG can be correctly localized.

Simultaneous Imaging Domain

Phantom experiment was performed to illustrate the area of simultaneous imaging domain on the imaged object. Two transparent glass tubes (0.4-cm diameter) were inserted into the cylinder with a vertical distance of 4.0 cm and horizontal distance of 1.5 cm, as shown in Fig. 3a. Each tube was filled with 1.3 μM ICG.

Figure 3
figure 3

Phantom experiment for illustrating the simultaneous imaging domain of the system. (a)The top view and side view of the experimental configuration. Two glass tubes (0.4-cm diameter) filled with 1.3 μM ICG were placed in a 2.5-cm diameter cylinder phantom at the height of 1.4 and 5.4 cm, respectively, with a horizontal distance of 1.5 cm. The blue point in the top view and the blue line in the side view both indicate the line-shaped parallel excitation source. (b) Reconstruction results of the two fluorescent tubes. Reconstructed fluorescence distributions are shown in the 3D view. The red curves on the cross section images represent the phantom boundary, and the small white circles represent the actual tube positions. Both images are normalized by the maximum of the reconstructed results and then displayed on the same color scale

Figure 3 demonstrates the performance of the system for whole-body imaging of two fluorescent tubes placed at different positions in the phantom. As shown in Fig. 3b, both fluorescent targets were reconstructed simultaneously at the heights where the center of actual fluorescent tubes positioned (Z = 1.4 cm and Z = 5.4 cm, respectively). The results suggest that both two tubes with a relatively large distance (4.3 cm center-to-center distance) can be localized and quantified simultaneously during one full-angle FMT imaging process. Utilizing the line-shaped parallel excitation pattern, the system could achieve a simultaneous imaging domain of 4.0 × 1.5 cm2 on the imaged object.

Whole-Body Simultaneous Imaging In Vivo

Animal experiment was also conducted to demonstrate the ability of this system in simultaneous imaging of the whole-body distribution of fluorescent markers in vivo. Two transparent glass bubbles (0.4-cm diameter, 0.4-cm long) both filled with 1.3 μM ICG solution were implanted into a 6-week-old nude mouse by surgical incision through the abdominal wall. One bubble was positioned in the right upper abdomen while the other positioned in the left lower abdomen, in order to simulate the whole-body fluorescent marker distributions. After the mouse placed and fixed on the rotation stage, FMT data acquisition was performed. The mouse was anesthetized by isoflurane during the whole experimental process. The optical properties of μa = 0.3 cm−1 and \( \mu_{\rm s}^{\prime} = 10.0\,\hbox{cm}^{-1}\) were used for the in vivo FMT reconstruction.

Figure 4a depicts the white light image at angle 180° overlaid with the 4-cm long line-shaped parallel excitation beam and corresponding fluorescence image collected at the same angle. The upper two red dotted lines indicate the heights where the brightest fluorescence signals appeared. The two green arrows in the white light image indicate the surgical incisions through which the fluorescent bubbles were inserted.

Figure 4
figure 4

Whole-body simultaneous imaging of fluorescent bubbles in vivo. (a) The white light image overlaid with the 4-cm long line-shaped parallel excitation beam and corresponding fluorescence image collected at 180°. (b) Reconstruction results of the two fluorescent bubbles. Reconstructed fluorescence distributions are shown in the 3D view. The red curves on the cross section images represent the mouse surface. Both images are normalized by the maximum of the reconstructed results and then displayed on the same color scale

As shown in Fig. 4b, both fluorescent targets were reconstructed around the heights where the brightest fluorescence signals appeared (Z = 2.3 cm and Z = 0.8 cm, respectively). The positions of reconstructed targets were approximately in agreement with the bubble positions maintained in the experiment. The reconstructed results illustrate that both two bubbles positioned at different regions of the mouse torso can be localized and quantified simultaneously during one full-angle FMT imaging process in in vivo experiment. As a result, based on the line-shaped parallel excitation pattern, whole-body FMT data acquisition time was reduced and the time resolution of imaging whole-body fluorescent marker distributions was improved.

Discussion

Challenges remain in FMT imaging of complete dynamic physiological processes in small animals through the whole animal body, which boost the designing of imaging systems with a whole-body simultaneous imaging domain. Herein, we have presented a novel non-contact full-angle fluorescence tomography system for imaging the whole-body fluorescent marker distributions in small animals. The core element of the proposed system is a special optical fiber with one rectangular end, which is employed to generate a line-shaped parallel excitation pattern. The direct advantage gained by this parallel excitation pattern is the extended excitation domain on the imaged object, which is a necessity for whole-body simultaneous imaging. Both phantom and animal experiments were conducted to evaluate the performances of this system.

The quantitation linearity experiments demonstrated that the system can provide a highly linear response between reconstructed FMT intensities and actual fluorescent marker concentrations for over two orders of magnitude. It also showed that system has a sensitivity of 260 fmole of ICG.

A simultaneous imaging domain of 4.0 × 1.5 cm2 was observed in phantom experiment. It is acceptable considering the size of the mouse torso, which is the most commonly imaged object in FMT studies. Moreover, the imaging domain could be extended by lengthening the line-shaped parallel excitation fiber if necessary.

The performance of simultaneous imaging of whole-body distribution of fluorescent markers was validated in vivo by localizing and quantification two fluorescent targets placed at different positions of a nude mouse torso. Since the whole animal body of interest could be excited simultaneously and extended informative datasets to reconstruct multiple fluorescent targets distributed in the imaged object could be acquired at one full-angle FMT imaging process, whole-body FMT data acquisition time will be reduced. In our studies, the typical whole-body fluorescence signal acquisition time is ~2 min, including the total exposure time and full-angle rotation time. Compared with our parallel excitation based system, conventional FMT systems with the single point excitation pattern could only excite a local region of the animal body. As a result, only fluorescent targets near the excitation point could be reconstructed correctly while other fluorescent targets are probably to be missed as they are relatively far from the excitation point. In order to obtain whole-body imaging results with the conventional single point excitation FMT system, the position of the excitation point should be changed successively to collect multiple cycles of projections. Consequently, the data acquisition time will be prolonged approximately linearly as the cycles of projection increased.33 Thus, information loss is inevitable due to the lower sampling rate, which is unacceptable especially in imaging fast dynamic physiological processes in vivo. Therefore, the parallel excitation pattern of our system brings in an improved time resolution, which imparts the ability to capture the complete dynamic physiological processes with whole-body distribution of fluorescent markers in vivo.

Full-angle imaging results of the complete ICG whole-body metabolism process in nude mouse has already been acquired utilizing this system, as shown in Fig. 5. In practical cases, the mouse with fur can also be imaged except for nude mouse. However, the hair of the imaged region should be removed before imaging. For the hair removed mouse, similar imaging results were also obtained, although not shown in this article. Tomographic results of ICG metabolism process have not been provided in this article mainly due to two reasons. First, although the tomographic reconstruction was performed utilizing the normalized Born method, the influence of high optical property heterogeneity in tissues could not be completely overcome, which may bring about error to the reconstructed results. Second, the accuracy of the reconstructed results could not be validated since the exact anatomical information of the internal tissues and organs in the mouse was unknown. Future work will be focused on resolving whole-body dynamic FMT images based on the principal component analysis (PCA) method,15 together with the aid of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT),36 in order to improve the reconstruction quality12 as well as to validate the accuracy of the reconstructed results.

Figure 5
figure 5

Full-angle whole-body imaging of ICG metabolism process in vivo. (a) The white light image overlaid with the 4-cm long line-shaped parallel excitation beam. (b) 0°, 80°, 180°, and 260° fluorescence imaging results of ICG distributions in a nude mouse acquired at different time points (1, 2, and 48 min) after tail vein injection. All the images are normalized by the maximum and then displayed on the same color scale

In order to reduce the system complexity, the proposed system are implemented with the CCD camera and the excitation source fixed while the imaged mouse vertically suspended and rotated for full-angle FMT data acquisition. It is most practical from the physics point of view, and most of the reported non-contact full-angle FMT systems are constructed in this way.3, 10, 17 However, placing the mouse in a vertical position is not a pleasant way from the biological point of view. In a recently published hybrid FMT/X-ray computed tomography (XCT) system, the mouse was hold by two carbon rods in a horizontal position.29 Similar system configuration could be referred in future system design to make the system more appropriate for biological application.

In conclusion, the full-angle FMT system based on a special line-shaped parallel excitation pattern presented here has direct advantage in the simultaneous imaging of whole-body fluorescence distributions during one full-angle FMT imaging process. Compared with conventional single point excitation FMT system, the proposed system with an extended imaging domain has an improved time resolution and consequently imparts the ability to capture the complete dynamic physiological processes in small animals. It provides an exciting application prospects in imaging whole-body dynamic physiological processes, such as disease progression, drug delivery, protein metabolism, etc.