Abstract
The emerging fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), has been associated with global amphibian population declines and extinctions. American bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) are widely reported to be a tolerant host and a carrier of Bd that spreads the pathogen to less tolerant hosts. Here, we examined whether bullfrogs raised from eggs to metamorphosis in outdoor mesocosms were susceptible to Bd. We experimentally exposed metamorphic juveniles to Bd in the laboratory and compared mortality rates of pathogen-exposed animals to controls (non-exposed) in two separate experiments; one using a Bd strain isolated from a Western toad and another using a strain isolated from an American bullfrog. We wanted to examine whether metamorphic bullfrogs were susceptible to either of these strains. We show that bullfrogs were susceptible to one strain of Bd and not the other. In both experiments, infection load detected in the skin decreased over time, suggesting that metamorphic bullfrogs from some populations may be inefficient long-term carriers of Bd.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Emerging diseases are increasing globally and are a threat to biodiversity (Jones et al. 2008; Fisher et al. 2012; McCallum 2012). High virulence of some pathogens combined with a broad host-range and the presence of biotic or abiotic pathogen reservoirs (Fisher et al. 2012; McCallum 2012) can lead to population-level effects, including extinctions (Fisher et al. 2012; McCallum 2012; Telfer and Brown 2012; Best et al. 2012). Further, the presence of competent reservoir species may facilitate the long-term maintenance and spread of pathogens in ecological assemblages (Telfer and Brown 2012; Keesing et al. 2006; Keesing et al. 2010) and drive the extinction of less tolerant or less resistant species (McCallum 2012; Telfer and Brown 2012; Best et al. 2012; Reeder et al. 2012). Disease-driven loss of biodiversity is a global phenomenon, and is exemplified by the amphibian–chytrid fungus system. Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which causes the disease chytridiomycosis, infects keratinized tissues (epidermis) of metamorphic amphibians (Brutyn et al. 2012; Greenspan et al. 2012) and impairs osmoregulation (Voyles et al. 2009). The fungus has decimated amphibian populations worldwide (Crawford et al. 2010; Skerratt et al. 2007). Since its discovery in 1998 (Berger et al. 1998; Lips 1998), the number of studies on Bd has risen dramatically (Blaustein et al. 2011), yet, the key factors that drive emergence, spread, and maintenance of Bd are just beginning to be understood (Lips et al. 2003; Morgan et al. 2007; Briggs et al. 2010; Rohr and Raffel 2010; Vredenburg et al. 2010; Bancroft et al. 2011; Farrer et al. 2011; Savage and Zamudio 2011). Bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) have been widely suggested as a tolerant carrier of Bd. That is, they may harbor the pathogen without signs of morbidity or mortality (Daszak et al. 2004; Garner et al. 2006), suggesting they may be an important reservoir species. International trade in bullfrogs is implicated as a major driver of the spread of Bd, both locally and globally (Schloegel et al. 2012; but see Liu et al. 2013). If bullfrogs serve as infection-tolerant reservoir species for Bd in native and non-native habitats, it could have profound effects on disease dynamics.
American bullfrogs are native to central and eastern parts of the United States and were introduced west of their historic range for bullfrog farming in the late 1800s (Kats and Ferrer 2003) and to other regions of the world in the 1930s (Schloegel et al. 2012). In the wild, bullfrogs have tested positive for Bd (Hanselmann et al. 2004; Garner et al. 2006; Bai et al. 2012) although quantitative estimates of Bd infection load in bullfrogs are largely unknown (but see Garner et al. 2006). Infection loads in commercially farmed (and released/escaped) bullfrogs may be unusually high because of housing at high densities, which could facilitate host-to-host transmission (Rodriguez-Serna et al. 1996).
Here, we experimentally examined whether newly metamorphic bullfrogs were susceptible to Bd. We reared American bullfrogs from eggs to metamorphosis in outdoor mesocosms to ensure no previous exposure to Bd (see Supplementary Methods). In two separate experiments, we randomly assigned bullfrogs to a control or a Bd-exposed treatment. In the first experiment, bullfrogs were exposed to either Bd strain JEL 274, isolated from a Western toad (Anaxyrus boreas) from Colorado or sham (control) inoculate. In a second experiment, bullfrogs were exposed to Bd strain JEL 630, isolated from an American bullfrog in Oregon or sham (control) inoculate. We compared the rate of mortality between Bd-exposed and control animals within each experiment. We did not compare the results between the different experiments.
Experiments were run approximately 2 weeks apart in two different cohort “waves” of animals from experimental mesocosms that were similar in age since metamorphosis (Gosner 1960). Thus, we do not present or discuss comparisons of Bd-exposed animals between pathogen strains. Within both experiments, we exposed newly metamorphic animals (2–4 weeks post-metamorphosis) to Bd at a concentration of 1.7 × 104 zoospores/ml in 15 ml of total inoculate. Control animals were exposed to sham inoculate prepared identically except for the presence of the pathogen (see Supplementary Methods). We monitored survival for 30 days and quantified infection load of all Bd-exposed animals as well as a random sample of 10 control animals (5 controls within each strain experiment) using quantitative-PCR methods of Boyle et al. (2004) (See Supplementary Methods). Animals that died during the experiment were immediately preserved in 95% ethanol. Animals surviving the full experimental duration were humanely euthanized in MS-222 in accordance with approved institutional animal care and use protocol and then immediately preserved in 95% ethanol. All experimental animals were swabbed for infection just before qPCR extractions, which took place several weeks after the end of the experiment. Preservation of animals in ethanol before swabbing for infection load helped to ensure that we were sampling infection load in the skin, rather than zoospores on the skin (from experimental Petri dishes). We sampled animals for Bd infection by firmly wiping fine tipped sterile rayon swabs (Medical Wire and Equipment-MW&E 113) along the ventral surface of animals (10 full swipes down the entire left side of each animal, from armpit to toes).
We used Kaplan–Meier (or product-limit) analyses in S-plus version 8.0 for Windows to generate “survival curves” to compare animals in control versus pathogen-exposed treatments for each strain experiment (JEL 274 and JEL 630). To statistically compare survival curves, we used a Cox’s proportional hazards model (which also controlled for body mass). The Cox proportional hazards model gives an overall p value (likelihood ratio test) which assesses the validity of the model, as well as p values for each factor and an associated “hazard ratio”. The hazard ratio represents a comparative indicator of the risk or probability of mortality associated with a given factor (a hazard ratio >1 indicates an increase in the probability of mortality). Cox proportional hazards models were performed in R, statistical computing environment (version 2.9.0, Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna) with the “coxph” function and the Survival package for survival analyses. We used a linear regression model to look at the relationship between the response variable (infection load) and time (days survived) in each experiment.
We show for the first time that bullfrogs were susceptible to JEL 274; the rate of mortality in Bd-exposed animals was significantly greater than the rate of mortality in control animals (Figure 1; Cox proportional hazards model p < 0.001; hazard ratio = 12.1). 13 of 17 Bd-exposed animals died. In comparison, bullfrogs were not susceptible to JEL 630; the rate of mortality in Bd-exposed animals was not different from the rate of mortality in control animals (Figure 1; Cox proportional hazards model p = 0.440; hazard ratio = 0.658).
Infection loads detected in the skin of bullfrogs within each experiment varied over time. In both experiments, infection load of experimental animals decreased over time (Figure 2) and days survived was a significant predictor of infection load in regression models for each strain experiment (strain JEL 274 adjusted R 2 = 0.74, p < 0.0001; strain JEL 630 adjusted R 2 = 0.29, p = 0.016). We present the raw infection load values in genome equivalents for all Bd-exposed animals for each experiment as opposed to an average quantitative infection load value (Table 1). Several pathogen-exposed animals (2 of the 17 bullfrogs exposed to JEL 274 and 3 of the 16 bullfrogs exposed to JEL 630) that survived the entire 30-day trial tested negative for infection at the end of the experiment (Table 1). Given that bullfrogs were exposed to four, weekly, inoculations of 1.7 × 104 zoospores, these results suggest that some bullfrogs either lose their infection or that some animals are innately resistant to infection. That is, some bullfrogs may actively decrease pathogen loads in epidermal tissue. Average infection load in bullfrogs, regardless of strain, was considerably lower than infection loads of other amphibian species reported from laboratory studies (e.g., Searle et al. 2011; Gahl et al. 2012) and in the field (Garner et al. 2006; Vredenburg et al. 2010; Reeder et al. 2012). The comparatively low infection load values in bullfrogs suggests that, at least under laboratory conditions, there may be a distinct “zoospore threshold” above which mortality occurs in this species, which is lower than the threshold observed in other amphibian species and populations exposed to Bd in field conditions (Vredenburg et al. 2010). Recent evidence shows that zoospore thresholds may be highly species specific (Gervasi et al. 2013). Our results suggest that bullfrogs may be resistant (they may be able to limit or reduce pathogen burden) but may still incur morbidity and mortality during pathogen exposure (i.e., they may not tolerate infection) (Reed et al. 2008; Raberg et al. 2009). Costs of pathogen resistance including energetic investment and collateral damage via immunopathology could contribute to the decline in host survival observed after bullfrog exposure to Bd, even at low infection loads. Rohr et al. (2010) showed that costs of pathogen exposure (in the absence of infection) may also have important fitness consequences for hosts. This concept is especially relevant in the amphibian–Bd system given recent evidence that Bd releases a compound that can cause rapid host mortality in the absence of infection (McMahon et al. 2013), which likely explains similar phenomena reported previously (Blaustein et al. 2005; Searle et al. 2011).
Our results show that American bullfrogs were susceptible to one strain of Bd but not to another. Thus, in some populations, depending upon the Bd strain they are exposed to, bullfrogs may be inefficient carriers or reservoir species for Bd. Since bullfrogs were susceptible to at least one strain of Bd, they may be susceptible to others. However, in other populations, bullfrogs may persist with infection that can be disseminated to less tolerant amphibian species. Our data support these conclusions for post-metamorphic bullfrogs, but further research is needed to determine if these results hold for adult bullfrogs.
Our results show that American bullfrog exhibit differential sensitivity to Bd. Differences in host–pathogen co-evolution with certain strains of Bd could explain consistently cited innocuous effects of pathogen exposure and infection in this species. For example, genotypic differences among pathogen strains could account for differences in virulence (Schloegel et al. 2012) and other pathogen characteristics (e.g., reproductive rate and zoospore size) and thus, alter host–pathogen interactions (Rosenblum et al. 2008, 2012; Fisher et al. 2009). In addition to mortality we observed during exposure to JEL 274, we also observed low infection loads and a decrease in infection load, over time (Figure 2). There is a lack of data on quantitative infection load in bullfrogs across the globe. At least one study has highlighted the vast differences in infection load in populations of bullfrogs in different regions of the world (Garner et al. 2006). Our experimental results have implications for the general belief that bullfrogs maintain high infection with Bd without signs of morbidity or mortality. Across ecological systems there may be variation in which species represent the most relevant reservoir species for this pathogen (Reeder et al. 2012). While adult bullfrogs may be important carriers of Bd in some systems, alternative hosts may be just as or more important for the maintenance and spread of this pathogen (Reeder et al. 2012; Gervasi et al. 2013; McMahon et al. 2013). Further, recent evidence suggests that there are important non-amphibian carriers of Bd including crayfish (McMahon et al. 2013) and that international trade of both amphibian and non-amphibian carriers could drive the global pathogen distribution (Liu et al. 2013). This study underscores how experimental studies may help us understand the often complex and context-dependent dynamics of host–pathogen systems.
References
Bai C, Liu X, Fisher MC, Garner TWJ, and Li Y (2012) Global and endemic Asian lineages of the emerging pathogenic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis widely infect amphibians in China. Diversity and Distributions 18:307-318
Bancroft B, Han BA, Searle CL, Biga LM, Olson DH, Kats LB, Lawler JJ, Blaustein AR (2011) Species-level correlates of susceptibility to the pathogenic amphibian fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in the United States. Biodiversity and Conservation 20: 1911-1920
Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, Green DE, Cunningham AA, Goggin, CL, Slocombe R, Ragan MA, Hyatt AD, McDonald KR, Hines HB, Lips KR, Marantelli G, Parkes H (1998). Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95:9031-9036
Best A, Webb S, Antonovics J, Boots M (2012) Local transmission processes and disease driven host extinctions. Theoretical Ecology 5: 211-217
Blaustein AR, Romansic JM, Scheessele EA, Han BA, Pessier AP, Longcore JE (2005) Interspecific Variation in Susceptibility of Frog Tadpoles to the Pathogenic Fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conservation Biology 19: 1460-1468
Blaustein AR, Han BA, Relyea RA, Johnson PTJ, Buck JC, Gervasi SS, Kats LB (2011) The complexity of amphibian population declines: understanding the role of cofactors in driving amphibian losses Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223:108-119
Boyle DG, Boyle DB, Olsen V, Morgan JAT, Hyatt AD (2004). Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 60: 141-148
Briggs CJ, Knapp RA, Vredenburg VT (2010) Enzootic and epizootic dynamics of the chytrid fungal pathogen of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences 107: 9695-9700
Brutyn M, D’Herde K, Dhaenens M, Van Rooij P, Verbrugghe E, Hyatt AD, Croubels S, Deforce D, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F, Martel A, Pasmans F (2012) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis zoospore secretions rapidly disturb intercellular junctions in frog skin. Fungal Genetics Biology 49: 830-837
Crawford AJ, Lips KR and Bermingham E (2010) Epidemic disease decimates amphibian abundance, species diversity, and evolutionary history in the highlands of central Panama. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Science USA 107: 13777-13782
Daszak P, Strieby A, Cunningham AA, Longcore JE, Brown CC, Porter D (2004) Experimentalevidence that the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) is a potential carrier of chytridiomycosis, an emerging fungal disease of amphibians. Herpetological Journal 14 201-207
Farrer RA, Weinert LA, Bielby J, Garner TWJ, Balloux F, Clare F, Bosch J, Cunningham AA, Welcon C, duPreez LH, Anderson L, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Shahar-Golan R, Henk D, Fisher MC (2011) Multiple emergences of genetically diverse amphibian-infecting chytrids include a globally hypervirulent recombinant lineage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:18732-18736
Fisher MC, Bosch J, Yin, Stead DA, Walker J, Selway L, Brown AJP, Walker LA, Gow NAR, Stajich JE, Garner TWJ (2009) Proteomic and phenotypica profiling of the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis shows that genotype is linked to virulence. Molecular Ecology 18: 415-429
Fisher MC, Henk DA, Briggs CJ, Brownstein JS, Madoff LC, McCraw SL, and Gurr SJ (2012) Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484: 186-194
Gahl MK, Longcore JE, and Houlahan JE (2012) Varying responses of northeastern North American amphibians to the chytrid pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conservation Biology 26:135-141
Garner TWJ, Perkins MW, Govindarajulu P, Seglie D, Walker S, Cunningham AA, Fisher MC (2006) The emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis globally infects introduced populations of the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Biology Letters 2:455-459
Gervasi SS, Gondhalekar C, Olson DH, Blaustein AR (2013) Host identity matters in the amphibian-Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis system: fine-scale patterns of variation in responses to a multi-host pathogen. PLoS ONE 8:e54490
Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190
Greenspan SE, Longcore JE Calhoun AJK (2012) Host invasion by Batrachochytrium dencrobatidis: fungal and epidermal ultrastructure in model anurans. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 100: 201-210
Hanselmann R, Rodriguez A, Lampo M, Fajardo-Ramos L, Aguirre AA, Kilpatrick AM, Rodriguez JP, Daszak P (2004) Presence of an emerging pathogen of amphibians in introduced bullfrogs Rana catesbeiana in Venezuela. Biological Conservation 120:115-119
Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, Daszak P (2008) Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451:990–993
Kats LB, and Ferrer RP (2003) Alien predators and amphibian declines: review of two decades of science and the transition to conservation. Diversity and Distributions 9:99-110
Keesing F, Holt RD, and Ostfeld RS (2006) Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecology Letters 9:485-498
Keesing F, Belden LK, Daszak P, Dobson A, Harvel CD, Holt RD, Hudson P, Jolles A, Jones KE, Mitchell CE, Myers SS, Bogich T, Ostfeld RS (2010) Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature 468:647-652
Lips KR (1998) Decline of a tropical montane fauna. Conservation Biology 12:106-117
Lips KR, Reeve JD, Witters LR (2003) Ecological traits predicting amphibian population declines in Central America. Conservation Biology 17:1078-1088
Liu X, Rohr JR, Li Y (2013) Climate, vegetation, introduced host and trade shape a global wildlife pandemic. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280: 20122506
McCallum ML (2012) Disease and the dynamics of extinction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 2828-2839
McMahon TA, Brannelly LA, Chatfield MWH, Johnson PTJ, Joseph MB, McKenzie VJ, Richards-Zawacki CL, Venesky MD, Rohr JR(2013) The chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, has non-amphibian hosts and releases chemicals that cause pathology in the absence of infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 210-215
Morgan JAT, Vredenburg VT, Rachowicz LJ, Knapp RA, Stice MJ, Tunstall T, Bingham RE, Parker JM, Longcore JE, Moritz C, Briggs CJ, Taylor JW (2007) Population genetics of the frog-killing fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:13845-13850
Raberg L, Graham AL, Read AF (2009) Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364: 37-49
Read AF, Graham AL, Raberg L (2008) Animal defenses against infectious agents: is damage control more important than pathogen control? PLoS Biol 6: 2638-2641
Reeder NMM, Pessier AP, and Vredenburg VT (2012) A reservoir species for the emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis thrives in a landscape decimated by disease. PLoS ONE 7:e33567
Rodriguez-Serna M, Flores-Nava A, Olvera-Novoa MA, and Carmona-Osalde C (1996) Growth and production of bullfrog Rana catesbeiana Shaw, 1802, at three stocking densities in a vertical intensive cultrue system. Aquacultural Engineering 15:233-242
Rohr JR, Raffel TR (2010) Linking global climate and temperature variability to widespread amphibian declines putatively caused by disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 8269-8274
Rohr JR, Raffel TR, Hall CA (2010) Developmental variation in resistance and tolerance in a multi-host—parasite system. Functional Ecology 24: 1110-1121
Rosenblum EB, Stajich JE, Maddox N, Eisen MB. 2008. Global gene expression profiles for life stages of the deadly amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America105:17034-17039
Rosenblum, E.B., Poorten,T.J., Joneson, S. & Settles, M. (2012) Substrate-specific gene expression in Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the chytrid fungus of amphibians.PLoS ONE 7, e49924
Savage AE and Zamudio KR (2011) MHC genotypes associate with resistance to a frog-killing fungus. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences 108:16705-16710
Schloegel LM, Toledo LF, Longcore JE, Greenspan SE, Vieira CA, Lee M, Zhao S, Wangen C, Ferreira CM, Hipolito M, Davies AJ, Cuomo CA, Daszak P, James TY (2012) Novel, panzootic and hybrid genotypes of amphibian chytridiomycosis associated with the bullfrog trade. Molecular Ecology 21:5162-5177
Searle CL, Gervasi SS, Hua J, Hammond JI, Relyea RA, Olson DH, Blaustein AR (2011) Differential host susceptibility to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, an emerging amphibian pathogen. Conservation Biology 25:965-974
Skerratt L, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald K, Phillott A, Hines HB, Kenyon N (2007) Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth 4:125-134
Telfer S, Brown K (2012) The effects of invasion on parasite dynamics and communities. Functional Ecology 26: 1288-1299
Voyles J, Young S, Berger L, Campbell C, Voyles WF, Dinudom A, Cook D, Webb R, Alford RA, Skerratt LF, Speare R (2009) Pathogenesis of chytridiomycosis, a cause of catastrophic amphibian declines. Science 326: 582-585
Vredenburg VT, Knapp RA, Tunstall TS, Briggs CJ (2010) Dynamics of an emerging disease drive large-scale amphibian population extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 9689-9694
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gervasi, S.S., Urbina, J., Hua, J. et al. Experimental Evidence for American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) Susceptibility to Chytrid Fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis). EcoHealth 10, 166–171 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-013-0832-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-013-0832-8