Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benefits of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Are More Pronounced in Elderly Patients

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic colorectal resection on short-term postoperative outcome in elderly patients.

Methods

A series of 535 patients with colorectal disease who had been randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 268) or open (n = 267) resection was analyzed. A total of 201 patients (37.6 percent) were elderly (aged 70 years or older) and 334 patients (62.4 percent) were younger than aged 70 years. Follow-up for postoperative morbidity was performed for 30 days after hospital discharge.

Results

Elderly patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score compared with younger patients in both the laparoscopic and open groups (P = 0.0001). In the open group, elderly patients had higher morbidity rate (37.5 vs. 23.9 percent; P = 0.02) and longer length of hospital stay (13 vs. 10.6; P = 0.007) compared with younger patients. In the laparoscopic group, morbidity rate (20.2 vs. 15.1 percent) and length of hospital stay (9.5 vs. 9.1) were similar in elderly and younger patients. In elderly patients, the laparoscopy-reduced morbidity rate (20.2 vs. 37.5 percent; P = 0.01) and length of hospital stay (9.5 vs. 13; P = 0.001) compared to the open approach. In younger patients, the advantages of the laparoscopic approach on morbidity rate (15.1 vs. 23.9 percent; P = 0.06) and length of stay (9.1 vs. 10.6; P = 0.004) were less pronounced.

Conclusions

Laparoscopy improved short-term postoperative outcome more in elderly than in younger patients. Advanced age was associated with higher morbidity and longer length of stay only in patients who underwent open colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evers BM, Townsend Jr. CM, Thompson JC. Organ physiology of aging. Surg Clin North Am 1994;74:23–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang JT, Shieh MJ, Chen CN, et al. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection for management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colon. World J Surg 2002;26:377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002;236:759–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:1111–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004;363:1187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs. open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bo F, Min-Hua Z, Zhi-Hai M, et al. Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18:191–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2070–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J. Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:923–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003;13:95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP. Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 2003;138:252–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Law WL, Chu KW, Ming Tung PH. Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:768–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcia Valdecasas JC, et al. Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 2000;14:22–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM. Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:326–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 1999;86:938–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Frasson M, Di Serio C, Di Carlo V. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:890–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Training period in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A case-matched comparative study with open surgery. Surg Endosc 2002;16:31–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-randomized trials. JAMA 2001;285:1987–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Irvin TT. Prognosis of colorectal cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg 1998;75:419–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vivi AA, Lopes A, Cavalcanti F, Rossi BM, Marques LA. Surgical treatment of colon and rectum adenocarcinoma in elderly patients. J Surg Oncol 1992;51:203–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kingston RD, Jeacock J, Walsh S, Keeling F. The outcome of surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly: a 12-year review from the Trafford database. Eur J Surg Oncol 1995;21:514–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spivak H, Maele DV, Friedman I, Nussbaum M. Colorectal surgery in octogenarians. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:46–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wise WE Jr., Padmanabhan A, Meesig DM, Arnold MW, Aguilar PS, Stewart WR. Abdominal colon and rectal operations in elderly. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:959–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bufalari A, Ferri M, Cao P, Cirocchi R, Bisacci R, Moggi L. Surgical care in octogenarians. Br J Surg 1996;83:1783–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Metabolic and functional results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1070–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1686–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Matteo Frasson M.D., Marco Braga M.D., Andrea Vignali M.D., Walter Zuliani M.D. & Valerio Di Carlo M.D.

Authors
  1. Matteo Frasson M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Braga M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Vignali M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Walter Zuliani M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Valerio Di Carlo M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Braga M.D..

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, June 2 to 6, 2007.

About this article

Cite this article

Frasson, M., Braga, M., Vignali, A. et al. Benefits of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Are More Pronounced in Elderly Patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 296–300 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9124-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9124-0

Key words

Search

Navigation