Abstract
Object
Fat suppressed 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences are of special interest in cartilage imaging due to their short repetition time in combination with high signal-to-noise ratio. At low-to-high fields (1.5–2.0 T), spectral spatial (spsp) radio frequency (RF) pulses perform superiorly over conventional saturation of the fat signal (FATSAT pulses). However, ultra-high fields (7.0 T and more) may offer alternative fat suppression techniques as a result of the increased chemical shift.
Materials and methods
Application of a single, frequency selective, RF pulse is compared to spsp excitation for water (or fat) selective imaging at 7.0 T.
Results
For SSFP, application of a single frequency selective RF pulse for selective water or fat excitation performs beneficially over the commonly applied spsp RF pulses. In addition to the overall improved fat suppression, the application of single RF pulses leads to decreased power depositions, still representing one of the major restrictions in the design and application of many pulse sequences at ultra-high fields.
Conclusion
The ease of applicability and implementation of single frequency selective RF pulses at ultra-high-fields might be of great benefit for a vast number of applications where fat suppression is desirable or fat–water separation is needed for quantification purposes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Kuo R, Panchal M, Tanenbaum L and Crues JV 3rd (2007). 3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(2): 245–261
Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR, Schertler T, Manestar M and Weishaupt D (2007). MR imaging of cartilage in cadaveric wrists: comparison between imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and gross pathologic inspection. Radiology 243(1): 180–187
Masi JN, Sell CA, Phan C, Han E, Newitt D, Steinbach L, Majumdar S and Link TM (2005). Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. Radiology 236(1): 140–150
Regatte RR and Schweitzer ME (2007). Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(2): 262–269
Hardy PA, Recht MP and Piraino DW (1998). Fat suppressed MRI of articular cartilage with a spatial-spectral excitation pulse. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(6): 1279–1287
Thomasson D, Purdy D and Finn JP (1996). Phase-modulated binomial RF pulses for fast spectrally-selective musculoskeletal imaging. Magn Reson Med 35(4): 563–568
Zur Y (2000). Design of improved spectral-spatial pulses for routine clinical use. Magn Reson Med 43(3): 410–420
Rosen BR, Wedeen VJ and Brady TJ (1984). Selective saturation NMR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(5): 813–818
Scheffler K, Heid O and Hennig J (2001). Magnetization preparation during the steady state: fat-saturated 3D TrueFISP. Magn Reson Med 45(6): 1075–1080
Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino D and Thomasson D (1996). Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 6(2): 329–335
Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Kiefer B, Jackson R, Yu J, Eaton CB and Schneider E (2006). Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 65(4): 433–441
Meyer CH, Pauly JM, Macovski A and Nishimura DG (1990). Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 15(2): 287–304
Hore P (1983). Solvent suppression in Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson 55: 283–300
Bernstein M, King K and Zhou X (2004). Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Submitted to MAGMA for inclusion in the Special Issue on High Field MR as New Concepts paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bieri, O., Mamisch, T.C., Trattnig, S. et al. Optimized spectrally selective steady-state free precession sequences for cartilage imaging at ultra-high fields. Magn Reson Mater Phy 21, 87 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-007-0092-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-007-0092-0