Abstract
The prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) continues to rise worldwide. Current migration patterns and increased travel to high-prevalence TB countries will result in more frequent presentations of less common forms of TB. Tuberculous dactylitis, a form of tuberculous osteomyelitis, is well recognised in countries with a high prevalence of TB. We provide a systematic review of all published cases of tuberculous dactylitis in children and adolescents and describe a case to illustrate the typical features of the disease. Our review revealed 37 cases of tuberculous dactylitis in children and adolescents, all reported in the last 17 years. Children less than 10 years of age are most frequently affected and the hand is the most commonly affected site. Concurrent pulmonary TB is present in a fifth of cases and systemic symptoms are usually absent. Positive TST and IGRA support the presumptive diagnosis, but cannot be used as rule-out tests. The definitive diagnosis relies on the detection M. tuberculosis by PCR or culture. Treatment should comprise of a standard three to four drug anti-tuberculous regimen. The optimal treatment duration remains unknown. Surgery has a limited role in the treatment in general but may play a supportive role, and curettage of the cavity has been recommended for avascular lesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) continues to rise worldwide [1]. With increasing migration from regions with a high prevalence of TB and increasing numbers of travellers to high-prevalence TB countries [2], less common forms of TB will be seen more frequently in industrialised countries. Extrapulmonary TB is more common in children and adolescents than adults, accounting for approximately one quarter of paediatric cases [3]. Less common forms of TB, such as tuberculous dactylitis, are well recognised in countries with a high prevalence of TB but may prove a diagnostic challenge to clinicians in industrialised countries who may be unfamiliar with the clinical features. This review summarises the epidemiology, clinical features and management of tuberculous dactylitis. It includes an illustrative case that highlights the important features as well as a summary of all previously published cases in children and adolescents.
Illustrative case
A 15-year-old Australian-born girl of Cambodian descent presented with a 6-month history of a swollen right middle finger associated with mild pain (Fig. 1, panel A). She did not recall any trauma and was otherwise well. She had not experienced similar symptoms in the past and there was no family history of rheumatological diseases. Her immunisations were up-to-date according to Australian guidelines, which do not routinely include Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine. She had lived in Cambodia for one year at the age of 18 months. She had also visited Cambodia for a five-week period when she was 10 years old. At presentation, the only abnormal physical finding was swelling of the proximal phalanx of the right middle finger without associated erythema or tenderness. Inflammatory markers including white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were within the normal range. Serology for human immunodeficiency virus was negative. Radiography showed a diffuse abnormality in the proximal phalanx of the right middle finger with a mottled appearance (Fig. 1, panel b). A tuberculin skin test (TST) showed 22 mm induration after 72 hours. An interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube, Cellestis, Australia) was negative. Her chest radiograph was normal and a radionuclide bone scan did not reveal involvement of further sites elsewhere.
The medullary cavity of the affected bone was surgically curetted and lavaged. Histopathology examination of the bone showed granulomatous inflammation (Fig. 2). Mycobacterium tuberculosis was detected in the biopsy specimen by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subsequently by culture. Treatment was started with isoniazid 300 mg daily, rifampicin 600 mg daily and pyrazinamide 1000 mg daily in divided doses. Susceptibility testing of the isolate revealed a fully sensitive strain and pyrazinamide was stopped after the initial two months of treatment. Radiography after four months of treatment showed improvement of the honeycomb lesions. Following a total treatment duration of 9 months, the patient remained well and the swelling had almost totally resolved. Radiography at the end of treatment showed resolution of the honeycomb lesions with healing accompanied by sclerosis (Fig. 1, Panels c and d).
Search strategy
Publications were identified by a systematic search of Medline (1950–2010), EMBASE (1950–2010) and Web of Science (1898–2010) using the following search strategy: (“dactylitis” OR “ventosa”) AND (“tuberc*” or “TB”). Reference lists from relevant publications and Google scholar identified an additional two articles. Publications in English, French, Italian and German were reviewed. Of the 114 publications identified, 49 were excluded (46 were not relevant, three were in other languages [Czech, Bulgarian and Mandarin]) leaving a total of 65 articles that were reviewed in detail. Of these, 28 included reports of tuberculous dactylitis in children and adolescents.
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics
TB osteomyelitis accounts for 1–2% of all TB cases but up to 10–20% percent of cases of extrapulmonary TB disease [4, 5]. Spinal TB (Pott’s disease) is the most common form of tuberculous osteomyelitis. Extraspinal tuberculous osteomyelitis may manifest in any location but most commonly involves the hands, feet, ribs and the skull [4, 6]. Tuberculous dactylitis is a less common but important form of tuberculous osteomyelitis. Our literature search identified a total of 37 cases of paediatric tuberculous dactylitis in 28 publications (Table 1). Tuberculous dactytlitis has most commonly been reported in children less than 10 years of age (Figs. 2 and 3). The hand is most frequently affected and only five (14%) out of 37 cases reported in the literature described tuberculous dactylitis in the foot [7–10]. Osteomyelitis caused by M. tuberculosis is thought to result from hematogenous spread during primary infection. The interval between primary infection and onset of symptoms is difficult to establish as the timing of primary infection is usually unknown. The index case has only rarely been identified and our case illustrates also the potential risk of this form of TB being acquired during travel to high TB prevalence countries [11]. Concurrent pulmonary TB is present in about a fifth of reported cases and systemic symptoms such as fever, night sweats and weight loss are frequently absent (Table 1). Concomitant involvement of other sites is present in about a quarter of published cases. The swelling is usually painless or only mildly painful, which can be an important feature to distinguish tuberculous from other causes of dactylitis [12, 13]. It typically affects the proximal phalanges or the metacarpal bones, most commonly involving a single bone (Table 1).
Diagnosis
A TST result was reported in 24 (66%) of the 37 cases and was positive in 21 (88%) and negative in three (12%) [10, 14, 15]. A positive TST therefore may be helpful in supporting the presumptive diagnosis of tuberculous dactylitis. An IGRA was not reported in any of the 37 cases previously reported. Notably, in our illustrative case the IGRA was negative. Only a few studies have assessed the performance of IGRAs for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB and in particular for tuberculous osteomyelitis. Two studies in adults with tuberculous osteomyelitis suggest a sensitivity of 41–67% [16, 17]. In addition, the sensitivity of IGRAs in children, particularly those under 5 years of age has been questioned [18, 19]. Based on this and the result in our case, an IGRA should not be used to exclude the diagnosis of tuberculous dactylitis. Radiographs typically show enlargement of the bone with periosteal thickening and destruction of the spongiosa resulting in a cystic appearance called ‘spina ventosa’. A diffuse infiltration with a lytic honeycomb appearance, as seen in our case, is less frequent. However, radiological features are not pathognomonic and confirmation of the diagnosis requires detection of M. tuberculosis from a bone biopsy by PCR or culture. Culture from a fine needle aspiration or from fluid collected from a sinus has also been shown to be helpful for diagnosis [20–24]. Differential diagnoses of tuberculous dactylitis include syphilis, acute bacterial or fungal osteomyelitis, sarcoidosis, gout, sickle cell dactylitis, bone tumours and rheumatoid arthritis.
Treatment and follow-up
Standard empiric treatment for tuberculous dactylitis is similar to that for pulmonary TB, comprising a three to four drug regimen including isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol. In cases of culture-proven tuberculous dactylitis with a resistant M. tuberculosis strain, change of anti-tuberculous drugs guided by resistance testing is required. Traditionally, a treatment duration of 12–18 months has been recommended for tuberculous osteomyelitis based on concerns about poor bone penetration and the difficulty of confirming cure [25]. The World Health Organization recommends a treatment duration of 9 months for TB osteomyelitis because of the difficulty in assessing treatment response [26]. A third of the case reports of tuberculous dactylitis did not detail the choice of anti-tuberculous drugs or the duration of treatment. Of those that specified the treatment duration, this was most commonly 9–12 months. The longest treatment duration reported was 18 months and one study did not treat with anti-tuberculous drugs and suggested “spontaneous complete healing is the rule” [27]. Prospective studies investigating treatment for tuberculous osteomyelitis in the spine suggest that a treatment regimen including isoniazid and rifampicin for a duration of 6–9 months is effective [28, 29]. It has also been suggested that 6 months of antituberculous treatment is sufficient as bacillary load is considered low in tuberculous dactylitis [9]. However, one recent retrospective study showed over 60% relapse rate in patients with spinal tuberculous osteomyelitis treated for six months compared to 0% relapse rate in those treated for nine months [30]. It is unclear whether data from spinal tuberculous osteomyelitis can be extrapolated to the treatment of tuberculous dactylitis. As evidence for the optimal treatment duration is not conclusive, we elected to treat our patient for 9 months. Surgery has a limited role in the treatment of tuberculous osteomyelitis in general but does have an important role in complicated spinal tuberculous osteomyelitis [28, 31]. For tuberculous dactylitis, surgery may play a supportive role and curettage of the cavity has been recommended for avascular lesions, for which anti-tuberculous therapy alone is unlikely to be successful [10, 25]. Monitoring clinical response for tuberculous dactylitis is difficult. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are frequently not elevated and repeat culture of the affected area is not practical. Clinical improvement together with repeat imaging is therefore most commonly advocated for monitoring treatment success [10, 25].
Prevention
It is likely that the BCG immunisation that infants in high-risk TB countries receive routinely at birth plays an important role in preventing all forms of TB including dactylitis [32]. However, no study has investigated the protective efficacy of BCG specifically for tuberculous dactylitis. It is notable that the patient described in our illustrative case was not BCG immunised.
Conclusion
Tuberculous dactylitis is a readily-treatable disease that is easily missed. It needs to be considered even in the absence of pulmonary and constitutional symptoms or when potential exposure to M. tuberculosis has occurred many years earlier. Positive TST and IGRA may support the presumptive diagnosis, but cannot be used as rule-out tests. The definitive diagnosis relies on the detection of M. tuberculosis by PCR or culture from a bone biopsy, or fluid from a fine needle aspiration or draining sinus. Unless susceptibility testing reveals resistance, treatment should comprise a standard three to four drug anti-tuberculous regimen for 2 months followed by treatment with isoniazid and rifampicin for the remaining treatment duration. The optimal treatment duration remains unknown but current data does not support treatment longer than 12 months and most reported cases suggest 9 months of treatment is sufficient.
References
World Health Organization (2008) Global TB database. http://www.who.int/tb/country/global_tb_database/en/. Cited December 18, 2008
World Tourism Organization (2007) Strong world tourism growth in 2007. Information and communication. United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Madrid, Spain
Feja K, Saiman L (2005) Tuberculosis in children. Clin Chest Med 26(2):295–312, vii
Teo HE, Peh WC (2004) Skeletal tuberculosis in children. Pediatr Radiol 34(11):853–860
Peto HM, Pratt RH, Harrington TA, LoBue PA, Armstrong LR (2009) Epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the United States, 1993–2006. Clin Infect Dis 49(9):1350–1357
Abdelwahab IF, Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Klein M, Hermann G (2006) Atypical extraspinal musculoskeletal tuberculosis in immunocompetent patients, a review. Part I: atypical osteoarticular tuberculosis and tuberculous osteomyelitis. Can Assoc Radiol J 57(2):86–94
Zoga A, Lee VW (1999) Pediatric case of the day. Tuberculosis dactylitis and primary pulmonary tuberculosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 (3):813, 815–817
Patel NC, Brogdon BG, Srinath MG, Adekal A (2000) Tuberculosis dactylitis (spina ventosa) secondary to pulmonary tuberculosis. Applied Radiolgy Online 29
Gyanshankar PM, Dhamgaye TM, Amol BF (2009) Spina ventosa discharging tubercle bacilli—a case report. Indian J Tuberc 56(2):100–103
Malik S, Joshi S, Tank JS (2009) Cystic bone tuberculosis in children—a case series. Indian J Tuberc 56(4):220–224
Ritz N, Connell TG, Curtis N (2008) To BCG or not to BCG? Preventing travel-associated tuberculosis in children. Vaccine 26(47):5905–5910
Andronikou S, Smith B (2002) "Spina ventosa"—tuberculous dactylitis. Arch Dis Child 86(3):206
Hardy JB, Hartmann JR (1947) Tuberculous dactylitis in childhood. J Pediatr 30:146–156
Weber P, Rosslein R (1994) Rapidly growing tumor of the hand—is tuberculosis as differential diagnosis gaining increased importance? Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 26(2):91–94
Wessels G, Hesseling PB, Beyers N (1998) Skeletal tuberculosis: dactylitis and involvement of the skull. Pediatr Radiol 28(4):234–236
Lai CC, Tan CK, Liu WL, Lin SH, Huang YT, Liao CH, Hsueh PR (2011) Diagnostic performance of an enzyme-linked immunospot assay for interferon-gamma in skeletal tuberculosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Song KH, Jeon JH, Park WB, Kim SH, Park KU, Kim NJ, Oh MD, Kim HB, Choe KW (2009) Usefulness of the whole-blood interferon-gamma release assay for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 63(2):182–187
Connell TG, Ritz N, Paxton GA, Buttery JP, Curtis N, Ranganathan SC (2008) A three-way comparison of tuberculin skin testing, QuantiFERON-TB gold and T-SPOT.TB in children. PLoS ONE 3(7):e2624
Connell TG, Tebruegge M, Ritz N, Bryant PA, Leslie D, Curtis N (2010) Indeterminate interferon-gamma release assay results in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 29(3):285–286
Maherzi H, Ben Osman R, Baccar M, Benalgia S (1973) A case of spina ventosa in an infant. Tunis Méd 51(3):143–145
Chowdhary V, Aggarwal A, Misra R (2002) Multifocal tubercular dactylitis in an adult. J Clin Rheumatol 8(1):35–37
Singh S, Gupta R, Jain S, Kumar N (2006) Tubercular dactylitis: fine needle aspiration cytology as a diagnostic modality. Acta Cytol 50(6):669–671
Singh JK (2009) Spina ventosa. Indian Pediatr 46(5):431–432
Handa U, Garg S, Mohan H, Garg SK (2010) Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology in tuberculosis of bone. Diagn Cytopathol 38(1):1–4
Gardam M, Lim S (2005) Mycobacterial osteomyelitis and arthritis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 19(4):819–830
World Health Organization (2010) Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines—4th edition. WHO, Geneva
Salimpour R, Salimpour P (1997) Picture of the month. Tuberculous dactylitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 151(8):851–852
(1986) A controlled trial of six-month and nine-month regimens of chemotherapy in patients undergoing radical surgery for tuberculosis of the spine in Hong Kong. Tenth report of the Medical Research Council Working Party on Tuberculosis of the Spine. Tubercle 67 (4):243–259
Medical Research Council Working Party on Tuberculosis of the Spine (1993) Controlled trial of short-course regimens of chemotherapy in the ambulatory treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Results at three years of a study in Korea. Twelfth report of the Medical Research Council Working Party on Tuberculosis of the Spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 (2):240–248
Ramachandran S, Clifton IJ, Collyns TA, Watson JP, Pearson SB (2005) The treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9(5):541–544
Nene A, Bhojraj S (2005) Results of nonsurgical treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults. Spine J 5(1):79–84
Young HH (1957) Tuberculous dactylitis; report of case. Proc Staff Meetings 32(15):381–386
Schaaf HS, Donald PR (2000) Radiological case of the month. Multiple-bone tuberculosis and dactylitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154(10):1059–1060
Shentov BR, Nedkova VP, Balaranov NK, Vulova SV (2006) Tuberculous dactylitis (“spina ventosa”) in an infant—a case presentation. Annual Congress European Respiratory Society, Munich
Aliagaoglu C, Atasoy M, Toker S, Erdogmus B, Ozdemir E (2006) Association of lupus vulgaris and multifocal tuberculous dactylitis and arthritis with multiple tuberculous scars. J Dermatol 33(8):585–587
Verrotti A, Chiarelli F, Marzano N, Sabatino G (1984) Bilateral spina-ventosa in the hand without interesting pulmonary tubercular incidents. Ital J Pediatr 10(5):658
Roy AK, Khanduri S, Girisha KM (2006) Fusiform swellings of fingers in a 3-year-old girl. J Postgrad Med 52(4):314–324
Rigauts H, Van Holsbeeck M, Lechat A (1989) Spina ventosa: the forgotten diagnosis. Report of one case, review of literature. J Belge Radiol 72(1):13–16
Subasi M, Bukte Y, Kapukaya A, Gurkan F (2004) Tuberculosis of the metacarpals and phalanges of the hand. Ann Plast Surg 53(5):469–472
Clarke JA (1990) Tuberculous dactylitis in childhood. The need for continued vigilance. Clin Radiol 42(4):287–288
John BM, Muthuvel S, Gupta S (2007) Multicentric tubercular dactylitis. MJAFI 63:186–187
Westman JA, Barson WJ, Powell DA (1984) Dactylitis and tuberculid eruptions in a child with primary tuberculosis. Pediatr Infect Dis 3(3):251–253
Tazi K, El Hassani A, Jorio M, Miri A, El Malki Tazi A (1995) Spina ventosa. Lyon Chir 91(5):382–385
Stanhope B, Dieppe C (2007) Dactylitis—an uncommon presentation of tuberculosis. Pediatr Emerg Care 23(6):394–396
Kothari PR, Shankar G, Gupta A, Jiwane A, Kulkarni B (2004) Disseminated spina ventosa. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 46(4):295–296
Teo SY, Ong CL (2006) Clinics in diagnostic imaging (108). Tuberculous dactylitis of the thumb, mediastinal and left hilar lymphadenopathy, and probable left cervical lymphadenopathy. Singapore Med J 47(3):243–249, quiz 250
Foasso MF, Hermier M, Berard J, Pracros JP, Collet JP (1985) Spina ventosa, a historic disease. Arch Fr Pédiatr 42(5):385–387
Jensen CM, Jensen CH, Paerregaard A (1991) A diagnostic problem in tuberculous dactylitis. J Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland) 16(2):202–203
Rabesalama SSEN, Rakoto-Ratsimba HN, Rakotovao M, Razafimahandry HJC (2010) Ostéoarthrite tuberculeuse due pouce: à propos d'un cas. Arch Pediatr 1:45–48
Pepersack F, Yourassowsky E (1979) Spina ventosa, a forgotten form of tuberculosis. 2 cases. Acta Clin Belg 34(6):360–364
Vervest TM, Nollen AJ, de Munck DR (1998) A case of spina ventosa. Acta Orthop Scand 69(3):322–323
Acknowledgements
We thank Associate Professor Duncan MacGregor for providing the histopathology photos and accompanying figure legend. NR is supported by Fellowship awards from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the European Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and The University of Melbourne. TGC is supported by Fellowship awards from the Nossal Institute of Global Health and The University of Melbourne. MT is supported by a Fellowship awards from the European Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and The University of Melbourne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ritz, N., Connell, T.G., Tebruegge, M. et al. Tuberculous dactylitis—an easily missed diagnosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30, 1303–1310 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1239-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1239-5