Introduction

Thrombin is a multi-functional serine proteolytic enzyme and is the key to blood clotting [1,2,3]. The representation of thrombin activity may provide a more precise assessment of its biological function and disease status than the measurement of thrombin concentration [4, 5]. Therefore, monitoring thrombin’s activity is beneficial for early diagnosis and treatment of diseases and individualized medication guidance.

Through literature review, there are various methods for the detection of thrombin activity: direct detection and indirect detection [6]. Direct detection means that thrombin directly acts on the substrate peptide segment to produce signal changes, including fluorescent [7] and ultraviolet method [8]. The advantages are high accuracy and sensitivity [9], but the disadvantages are high cost. Indirect detection has advantages of simplicity and low cost, but its disadvantages are low accuracy and sensitivity [10, 11]. Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) integrates the advantages of chemiluminescence and electrochemistry: high sensitivity, good reproducibility, and simple use, among others, providing a new idea for the determination of thrombin activity [12].

Tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II)/tri-n-propylamine(Ru(bpy)32+/TPA) system has been widely used for ECL detection due to its good stability and strong signal [13]. However, the strong water solubility of Ru(bpy)32+ limits its utilization in ECL applications. Thus, solving its immobilization problem is necessitated [14]. As a new class of two-dimensional carbide or nitride, MXene has excellent conductance, stability, and hydroxyl and oxygen groups on its surface that can promote surface modification and realize stable intercalation of functional molecules [15]. Therefore, ultrathin two-dimensional MXene nanosheets were selected to solve the immobilization problem of Ru(bpy)32+.

In this work, a highly sensitive ECL method for the determination of thrombin activity was developed using the sensitization effect of MXene (Scheme 1). The first step is to prepare MXene and ferrocene@SiO2-streptavidin (Fc@SiO2-SA) nanoparticles (see the “Experimental methods” section for details). Then, MXene was modified on the surface of glassy carbon electrode (GCE) using Nafion. Gold nanoparticles were then modified on the electrode. The substrate peptide was attached to the GCE by Au–S bond, and the non-specific adsorption site was blocked with mercaptohexanol (MCH). Through the interaction between SA and biotin, Fc@SiO2-SA nanoparticles prepared were connected to the surface of GCE to form a biosensor. The presence of active thrombin specifically cleaved substrate peptides, resulting in the shedding of Fc@SiO2-SA nanoparticles and a significant increase in ECL intensity. Furthermore, in the presence of the inhibitor, thrombin was unable to lyse the peptide, leading to no significant change in ECL strength. The biosensor was utilized to measure human thrombin activity and screen for potential thrombin inhibitors.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Scheme for the construction of a biosensor for thrombin activity detection and inhibitor screening

Artemisiae argyi Folium (AAF) is a kind of traditional Chinese herbal medicine, which has been proved to contain rich natural active substances. Volatile oil is the main active substance in AAF, which has been shown to have antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory effects [16]. Studies have also found that AAF can improve intestinal immunity and antioxidant capacity [17, 18]. In this study, 10 active components of AAF (cebutathrin, cineolin, isoquercitrin, nepetin, eupatilin, β-sitosterol, 4-terpenenol, α-terpineol, L-camphor, L-borneol) were selected to screen potential thrombin inhibitors using the developed ECL biosensors.

Experiment

Materials and reagents

Titanium Aluminum Carbide (Ti3AlC2, 99.9%), Nafion 117(5%), hydrogen tetrachloroaurate(ш) trihy-drate (HAuCl4∙3H2O, 99.9%), terpyridine ruthenium chloride hexahydrate (Ru(bpy)3Cl2∙6H2O, 98%), hemoglobin (Hb), lysozyme, and human albumin (HSA, 96–99%) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Tris (4,4'-dicarboxylicacid-2,2'-bipyridyl) rutheniuM(II) dichloride (Ru(dcbpy)3Cl2, 98%) was purchased from Suzhou Suna Tech Inc. (Suzhou, China). Streptavidin (SA) and human immunoglobulin (IgG, 50%) were obtained from Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The thrombin polypeptide substrate was synthesized and purified by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) with the sequence of bio-S-G-R-P–V-L-G-C. The fluorescent substrate of chymotrypsin BOC-Val-Pro-Arg-AMC (98%, BOC: t-Butyloxycarbonyl; AMC: 7-Amino-4-methylcoumarin.) was purchased from AAT Bioquest (USA). Jaceosidin (Jac), cineole (Cin), isoquercitrin (Iso), nepetin (Nep), eupatilin (Eup), and β-sitosterol (β-Sit) were provided by Chengdu Yirui Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). 4-terpenenol (Ter) and α-terpineol (α-Ter) were provided by Shanghai Bepharm Science&Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). L-camphor (L-Cam) and L-borneol (L-Bor) were provided by Shanghai Yuan-fan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All chemical reagents were analytical grade, and ultrapure water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm was used throughout the experiment.

Instrument

A glassy carbon electrode (GCE, Φ = 3 mm) was used as the working electrode, an Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) electrode as the reference electrode, and a platinum wire (Pt) as the counter electrode in a standard three-electrode system. The ECL measurement was performed on the MPI-A/B ECL analyzer (China Xi'an Remax Electronic Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Xi’an, China) in a dark room at 25 ℃. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on CH1660E electrochemistry workstation (Shanghai CH Instrument, China). Transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI-F20, Thermo Fisher Scientific, American) and scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS sigma 300, Carl Zeiss AG, Germany) were used to record the morphology of different composite materials. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a Thermo Scientific Escalab 250Xi Instrument (Thermoelectricity Instruments, USA). Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FT-IR) was conducted on a Thermo IRTracer 100 FTIR spectrometer using KBr pellets (American). The zeta potential and particle size distribution were conducted by a Zetasizer Nano ASE analyzer (Malvern, UK). An ultraviolet spectrophotometer (UV 1600, Fuli Instrument, Zhejiang) and fluorescence spectrophotometer (RF-6000, Shimadzu, Japan) was used to obtain the ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectrum and fluorescence spectrum. Fluorescence and ECL results were compared using a multi-function microplate reader system (SuPerMax-3000M2, Flash, Shanghai) in the recovery experiment.

Preparation of Ti3C2Tx MXene and sensitization test

Ti3C2Tx MXene was synthesized by etching Ti3AlC2 with HF. First, 2.0 g LiF was dissolved in 20 mL 12 M hydrochloric acid and stirred evenly. Ti3AlC2 (1 g) was added incrementally and stirred at 45 ℃ for 24 h. The etching solution was discarded by centrifugation, and the precipitate was washed twice with 1 mM HCl and then with ultrapure water (pH 6). The precipitation was collected by centrifugation and vacuum freeze-drying to obtain Ti3C2Tx MXene powder. (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) was stirred with Ti3C2Tx MXene for 12 h to get NH2-MXene.

Ti3C2Tx MXene (10 mg/mL) was dispersed in Nafion solution (1% w/v) (1:1, v/v), to form Nafion/MXene mixture, and then, ultrasonic dispersion for 20 min resulted in the uniform Nafion/MXene dispersion. Then, 5 μL prepared Nafion/MXene and Nafion solution (0.5% w/v) were separately added to the surface of GCE. After drying, 20 μL 10 mM Ru(bpy)32+ solution was added to the surface of GCE, and the excess Ru(bpy)32+ was removed to obtain the modified electrode.

Preparation of Fc@SiO2 nanocomposites

Fc@SiO2 nanocomposites were successfully synthesized by reversed-phase microemulsion method. Firstly, 7.5 mL cyclohexane, 1.8 mL n-hexanol, and 1.77 mL trilatone X-100 were mixed and stirred for 30 min. A 400 μL 0.2 M Fc-COOH was added to the above solution and stirred for 30 min to form a stable W/O system. Then, 100 μL tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and 60 μL NH3·H2O (30% w/v) were slowly added and stirred continuously for 24 h. After the reaction was completed, Fc@SiO2 nanoparticles were separated from the W/O system by adding 10 mL acetone and centrifugation at 6000 r/min for 30 min. Finally, the precipitation was washed with water and ethanol several times, and Fc@SiO2 was stored in 1 mL anhydrous ethanol.

Preparation of Fc@SiO2@SA

Fc@SiO2 nanoparticles were connected with streptavidin (SA) according to Dong et al. [19]. Firstly, the prepared 1 mL Fc@SiO2 suspension was diluted to 5 mL with anhydrous ethanol, and 400 μL APTES was added stirred for 4 h. The product was collected by centrifugation (12,000 rpm, 10 min) and washed several times with water and ethanol. Then, 5 mL of 5% (w/v) glutaraldehyde solution was added and stirred for 4 h. The product was washed again with water and dispersed in 2 mL of ultrapure water. Finally, 200 μL SA solution (1.0 mg /mL, 0.01 M PBS) was added, stirred for 4 h, and centrifuged with PBS (0.01 M pH 7.4) for several times to obtain Fc@SiO2@SA, which was dispersed in 1 mL PBS (0.01 M pH 7.4) and stored at 4 ℃ for use.

Construction of the ECL sensor

The electrode underwent polishing using 0.05 μm Al2O3 polishing powder on a chamois cloth until it achieved a mirror-like surface. Afterwards, it was rinsed with ultrapure water and dried using nitrogen gas. A solution containing 30 mg/mL of MXene dispersion was combined with 0.75% Nafion (w/v) at a 1:1 volume ratio. After 30 min of sonication, the resulting mixture was evenly spread over the surface of a GCE and allowed to dry at room temperature. Then, 20 μL of 10 mM Ru(bpy)3Cl2 solution was added and dried at 60 ℃. Excess Ru(bpy)3Cl2 was washed away and dried. Next, the nano-gold film was modified by electrodeposition, and then, 10 μL 0.5 mg/mL thrombin substrate was added to the surface of the electrode by drops and incubated at 4 ℃ for 18 h away from light. After that, the excess substrate was removed, and 10 μL 1 mM MCH was dripped onto the electrode surface and incubated for 1 h at 4 ℃ in the dark to block the excess non-specific adsorption sites. Then, 10 μL Fc@SiO2@SA solution was added to the electrode and incubated at 4 ℃ for 18 h in the dark. Finally, the Ru@MXene/Fc@SiO2@SA ECL biosensor was obtained.

Determination of thrombin activity in human serum

Blood sample (5 mL) from a healthy volunteer was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected and diluted 100 times as the prepared serum. Thrombin solution in PBS buffer (pH 7.4 0.1 M) (1 mL) with different activity units (1.00 × 10−9 U/mL, 1.00 × 10−8 U/mL, 1.00 × 10−7 U/mL) was spiked into the prepared serum (1 mL) separately. The mixture (10 μL) was added onto the as-prepared ECL biosensor at 37 ℃ for 1 h followed by washing completely with PBS. The ECL response was recorded from − 0.1 to 0.6 V at a scan rate of 100 mV/s. The voltage of the photomultiplier tube (PMT) was set at − 600 V. CV and EIS were collected in a solution that contained 0.1 M KCl and 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/[Fe(CN)6]4−(1:1). The CV measurement range was − 0.1 to 0.6 V, and the scan rate was 100 mV/s. The EIS measurement was performed from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz, 25.0 mV amplitude, and 0.23 V electrode potential.

Screening of thrombin inhibitors in Artemisiae argyi Folium

Argatroban (10 nM, 40 μL) and 10 tested compounds (Jac, Cin, Iso, Nep, Eup, β-Sit, Ter, α-Ter, L-Cam, and L-Bor) (1 μM, 40 μL) were separately incubated with 1 μU/mL thrombin at 37 ℃ for 10 min. Then, each mixture was dropped on the surface of the electrode to carry out the enzymatic reaction. After incubation at 37 ℃ for 60 min, the reaction on the electrode surface was terminated, and the ECL signal was recorded. Meanwhile, in order to verify the results, the commercial fluorescence method was also performed. Different compounds were separately mixed with thrombin solution and incubated at 37 ℃ for 10 min. Then, 50 μL 0.05 mg/mL substrate (Boc-Val-Pro-Arg-AMC) solution was added. After incubation at 37 ℃ for 60 min, the fluorescence intensities of the final solutions were recorded using a microplate reader at 380 nm excitation and 460 nm emission.

Determination of Ki value of potential inhibitors

First, different concentrations of substrates (1 ~ 64 μM, two-fold relationship between concentrations) were added on the biosensor and to calculate the Km value of thrombin under the optimal conditions. Next, Arg (10 nM), Iso (1 μM), and Nep (1 μM) were mixed with 1 μU/mL thrombin and incubated at 37 ℃ for 10 min, respectively. Then, the above substrates (1 ~ 64 μM) were added on the biosensor and to calculate the Ki value of Arg (10 nM), Iso (1 μM), and Nep (1 μM), respectively.

Molecular docking assay

The molecular docking assay was carried out using AutoDock 4.2 (Scripps Research Institute, USA), where the crystal structure of thrombin (PDB ID = 3 RM2) with a resolution of 1.23 Å was obtained from PDB.org. The ligand Hirudin variant-2 and water molecules were removed, and polar hydrogen atoms were added. The SDF formats of argatroban, isoquercitrin, nepetin, L-camphor, and L-borneol were converted into PDB format and output with OpenBabel 2.4 to ensure that the energy of the compound was minimized. After that, molecular docking was performed with AutoDock 4.2.

Results and discussion

Characterization of Ti3C2Tx MXene

The structure and morphology of Ti3C2Tx MXene were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As shown in Fig. 1a, the SEM image of Ti3C2Tx MXene shows an accordion-like layered structure [20, 21]. The results indicate that the material exhibits a favorable stripping effect. Figure 1b displays the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Ti3AlC2 and Ti3C2Tx MXene. The results show that the peak (104) of Ti3AlC2 disappears in the X-ray diffraction pattern of Ti3C2Tx MXene, indicating that the Al layer has been successfully removed after etching. Compared with Ti3AlC2, the (002) peak of Ti3C2Tx MXene is shifted to a smaller angle due to the enlarged interlayer, which indicates that Ti3AlC2 has been successfully transformed into Ti3C2Tx MXene [22, 23]. The Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) of Ti3AlC2 and Ti3C2Tx MXene are shown in Fig. 1c. To be specific, -OH as surface-bonded functional groups, interlayer intercalated water molecules, or externally adsorbed water molecules trigger the absorption peaks at 3430 and 1633 cm−1. The results indicate that Al has been successfully exfoliated and removed, exposing the interlayer -OH of Ti3C2Tx MXene [24, 25]. The FT-IR analysis provides additional evidence of the successful synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXene.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structure characterization of Ti3C2Tx MXene synthesis process. a SEM of Ti3C2Tx MXene; b, c XRD and FT-IR of Ti3AlC2, Ti3C2Tx MXene; d, e CV and ECL curve of Nafion/Ru(bpy)32+ and Nafion/MXene/Ru(bpy)32+

The composition of Ti3C2Tx MXene stripped powder was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The full spectrum of titanium (Ti), carbon (C), oxygen (O), and fluorine (F) is shown in Fig. S1(a). From Fig. S1(b), we can see that the Ti2p spectrum has six peaks at 454.42, 455.60, 458.53, 460.78, 463.85, and 464.81 eV, which belong to Ti-C 2p3; Ti 2p3; Ti–O, F 2p3; Ti 2p1; Ti-C 2p1; and Ti–O 2p1 bands, respectively. C1s spectrum (Fig. S1c) has three peaks at 281.14, 284.46, and 285.63 eV, belonging to C-Ti-Tx, C–C, and C-O bands, respectively. As shown in Fig. S1(d), there are five peaks in the O1s spectrum at 529.18, 529.99, 531.14, 532.34, and 533.68 eV, belonging to the O-Ti, C-Ti-Ox, C-Ti-(OH)x, O–Al, and H2O bands. These XPS results are consistent with Han et al. [26], Yang et al. [27], and Halim et al. [28], which indicate the successful preparation of MXene.

The results of sensitization effect of MXene are shown in Fig. 1d and e. The current (Fig. 1d) and the ECL intensity (Fig. 1e) of the Nafion/MXene modified electrode (red line) are enhanced about 4 and 12 times compared with the pure Nafion modified electrode (black line), which proves that MXene has good electrical conductivity and MXene has excellent fixation effect on Ru(bpy)32+ [29, 30].

Characterization of Fc@SiO2@SA

The characterization of Fc@SiO2@SA information is displayed in Fig. S2. Figure S2(a) shows the TEM image of Fc@SiO2@SA. It can be seen that Fc@SiO2 is a spherical particle with a particle size of about 120 nm, which is uniform and smooth. SA with a particle size of about 40 nm is attached to the Fc@SiO2 surface and provided good dispersion in water. Figure S2(b) shows the zeta potential changes during the synthesis of Fc@SiO2@SA. The zeta potential changes from − 9.74 mV (Fc@SiO2) to 1.29 mV (Fc@SiO2-NH2), which indicates the successful grafting of -NH2 by APTES. After the connection of SA, the zeta potential value changes to − 4.81 mV. The results indicate the successful preparation of Fc@SiO2@SA.

The UV–visible absorption spectra of SA, Fc, Fc@SiO2, and Fc@SiO2@SA are shown in Fig. S2(c). SA has an absorption peak at 290 nm. Fc@SiO2 and Fc@SiO2@SA have two absorption peaks at 303 nm and 439 nm which are attributed to Fc. The peak at 303 nm represents π-π* transition and the peak at 439 nm due to the center transfer characteristics of Fc ligands. After the formation of Fc@SiO2, the absorptions at 303 nm and 439 nm are further enhanced, which may be due to the core–shell structure of SiO2 that exhibits Fc accumulation effect [31, 32].

The FT-IR spectra of SA, Fc, Fc@SiO2, and Fc@SiO2@SA are shown in Fig. S2(d), showing the functional groups in the synthesis process. The wide absorption band at 1219 ~ 1068 cm−1 is the antisymmetric stretching vibration peak of Si–O-Si, and the symmetric stretching vibration peak at 794 cm−1 and 449 cm−1 is the symmetric stretching vibration peak of Si–O, which proves that Fc@SiO2 has good stability. Meanwhile, the double peaks of SA at 2920 cm−1 and 2665 cm−1 indicate that SA has been successfully combined to Fc. The above conclusions prove that the preparation of Fc@SiO2@SA is successful.

Characterization of the ECL biosensor

The changes of current and voltage during the sensor preparation are characterized by cyclic voltammetry analysis (CV), as shown in Fig. 2a. First, a pair of REDOX peaks appeared at 0.29 V and 0.21 V at the unmodified GCE electrode, corresponding to the current of 4.06 × 10−5 A and − 4.16 × 10−5 A, respectively. After modification of MXene@Nafion, due to the poor conductivity of Nafion [33, 34], the REDOX peak changes to 0.34 V and 0.18 V, the voltage difference increases significantly, and the current decreases significantly. After modification of Ru(bpy)32+, the REDOX peak changes to 0.46 V and 0.14 V, and the current further decreases, possibly because Ru(bpy)32+ obstructs the electron transport on the GCE surface. After electrodeposition of Au, the REDOX peaks are 0.30 V and 0.19 V, and the current is also significantly increased due to the strong conductivity of Au. After modification of the substrate and Fc@SiO2@SA, the current decreases gradually because of the poor conductivity of the polypeptide and SiO2. Once thrombin was present and specifically cut off the peptide, the current value increased due to Fc@SiO2@SA nanocomposite away from the electrode. These results indicate that the construction of the ECL biosensor was successful.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Characterization diagram of ECL biosensor preparation process. a Cyclic voltammetry (CV); b electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); c electrochemical luminescence diagram (ECL)

Electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) is used to characterize the resistance changes during the sensor preparation, as shown in Fig. 2b. The main parameters include electrolyte solution (Rs), electrode surface transfer resistance (Ret), Warburg impedance (W), and double layer capacitance (CPE), where Ret reflects the change of electrode surface resistance. First, the unmodified GCE electrode had an extremely low Ret value of 53 Ω. After modification of MXene@Nafion and Ru(bpy)32+, the Ret value increased to 2350 Ω and 4047 Ω due to the poor conductivity. When Au was electrodeposited, the strong conductivity of Au reduced the Ret value to 1418 Ω. Next, after the substrate and Fc@SiO2@SA were attached, the Ret value increased to 4615 Ω and 5114 Ω due to the poor conductivity of them. Finally, when thrombin cut off the peptide, part of the Fc@SiO2@SA left, and the Ret value decreased slightly to 4590 Ω. Therefore, the EIS results are consistent with CV, which further indicate the successful construction of the ECL biosensor.

Figure 2c shows the specific ECL behavior of the biosensor. The bare GCE and the one modified with MXene@Nafion do not show a significant ECL signal. After modification of Ru(bpy)32+, an obvious ECL signal peak of 7486 a.u. appears. After Au electrodeposition, the ECL value decreased to 7031 a.u. When the substrate was incubated, the ECL value decreased further to 5717 a.u. due to the blocking effect of peptide. Next Fc@SiO2@SA was connected, and the ECL value dropped to 117 a.u. due to the strong quenching effect of Fc@SiO2@SA. Finally, when thrombin was added, the ECL signal increased to 4896 a.u. because part of Fc@SiO2@SA was displaced. These results demonstrate the successful construction of the ECL biosensor.

Analytical performance of thrombin ECL biosensor

The “Optimization of the experimental conditions” section is shown in the Supplementary Material. The thrombin with different activities (1 × 10−10 U/mL ~ 1 × 10−6 U/mL) was detected under the optimal conditions to investigate the analytical performance of the sensor. Figure 3a–c show the ECL curves (a) and the linear curve (b) of different thrombin activities and selectivity (c) of the ECL sensor. The ECL value gradually increased with increasing thrombin activity. The ECL biosensor demonstrated a high level of accuracy with a linear regression equation of y = 337.18x + 3420.43 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9998. In addition, the sensor displayed a low detection limit (LOD) of 8.3 × 10−11 U/mL (S/N = 3) for thrombin activity. The criterion for determination of the LOD is based on the 3σ/m criterion (where σ is the standard deviation of the blank or standard deviation of the intercept and m is the slope of the calibration plot). Figure 3c illustrates that the ECL biosensor displays a notably high response to thrombin, while ΔECL for HSA, IgG, Hb, and lysozyme is comparable to that of the blank control, indicating that the constructed ECL biosensor is specific to thrombin. The sensor also demonstrated a strong level of repeatability (Fig. 3d), with relative standard deviation (RSD) of 4.00% and 4.16% for five modified GCE electrodes before (red) and after (blue) incubation with thrombin. The precision of the ECL sensor was also investigated. As shown in Fig. 3e, the electrode was scanned continuously for 10 cycles before (red) and after (blue) incubation of thrombin with RSD of 0.70% and 0.74%. Figure 3f demonstrates the storage stability of the ECL biosensor by monitoring the ΔECL signal of thrombin over time. Results indicate that the sensor exhibited stable performance, with thrombin signals of 100%, 92.9%, 88.1%, 85.0%, 84.7%, and 83.7% at 1 day, 3 days, 5 days, 7 days, 9 days, and 11 days, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

ECL biosensor methodology investigation diagram. a ECL diagrams of different thrombin activities; b linear relationship between sensor ΔECL and thrombin activity; c Selectivity of the ECL biosensor for thrombin detection by comparing it with different interfering proteins. The concentration of all interfering proteins was 1 mg/mL, and thrombin concentration was 1 μU/mL. d, e Repeatability of ECL biosensor for 5 electrodes and stability of ECL biosensor scanning for 10 cycles. Fc quenched refers to the state before thrombin addition, TB incubated refers to the state after thrombin addition, thrombin concentration was 1 μU/mL; f 11-day storage stability of ECL biosensors; thrombin concentration was 1 μU/mL

Meanwhile, the analytical performance of this thrombin biosensor was compared with some previously reported methods (Table S1), such as fluorescence, electrochemistry, electrochemiluminescence, photoelectron chemistry, and chemiluminescence. The prepared ECL biosensor has obvious advantages in terms of detection sensitivity and linear range. In addition, the LOD of the thrombin activity fluorometric assay kit (ELISA) produced by Biovision is only 10 ng/mL, but the LOD of this ECL sensor is 83 pU/mL, providing a significant increase in sensitivity.

Detection of human serum thrombin

To assess the accuracy of the ECL sensor, both the standard addition method and a comparison with a commercial fluorescence kit were employed. As shown in Table 1, the recoveries of ECL method are 104.19%, 103.96%, and 96.25%, with RSD of 3.08%, 1.72%, and 1.81%, respectively. The recoveries of FL method were 98.48%, 101.16%, and 100.44%, with RSD of 1.07%, 0.21%, and 0.13%, respectively. Results from both methods fell within the expected error range. In conclusion, the ECL biosensor can be used to detect thrombin activity in human serum, which has great potential for practical applications.

Table 1 Comparison of recovery rates of thrombin activity in human serum

Screening of potential thrombin inhibitors

Agatroban (Arg) is a direct thrombin inhibitor with an affinity and reversible binding to the thrombin catalytic site [35]. Therefore, Arg was selected as the positive control in the follow-up trial. Figure 4a displays the inhibition curve for Arg, with its IC50 value of 0.14 nM calculated using formula (1). This result closely aligns with the previously reported value of 9.36 nM in the literature [36].

$$\mathrm{Inhibitory}\;\mathrm{rate}=\left(1-\frac{I_x}{I_0}\right)\times100\%$$
(1)

where Ix and I0 are the ECL intensity with and without inhibitor.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Screening of thrombin inhibitors. a Inhibition curve of positive drug argatroban(Arg) (raw data with bars in blue and fitted curve in red); b comparison of thrombin inhibition rates of 11 compounds with ECL and fluorescence (FL) methods; c fluorescence emission spectrogram of β-sitosterol (β-Sit), L-camphor (L-Cam), and L-borneol (L-Bor) at excitation wavelength 351 nm; d inhibition kinetics of argatroban (Arg), isoquercitrin (Iso) and nepetin (Nep) (fitted curves)

The inhibitory rates of the chosen 10 compounds (Jac, Cin, Iso, Nep, Eup, β-Sit, Ter, α-Ter, L-Cam, and L-Bor) were determined by the constructed ECL biosensor. Fluorescence method was also taken as a comparison. Forty microliters of Arg (10 nM) and 10 compounds (1 μM) were mixed with 10 μL thrombin and incubated at 37 ℃ for 10 min. The mixture was taken to carry the ECL and FL experiments. As shown in Fig. 4b, the inhibition rates of the majority of the compounds measured by both methods are consistent. In ECL results, Iso, Nep, L-Cam, and L-Bor were beyond 50%, especially Iso (90.26%) and Nep (71.01%). However, FL results show that only Iso and Nep were greater than 50%. Remarkably, significant differences were observed in the results of β-Sit, L-Cam, and L-Bor between the ECL and fluorescence methods.

The fluorescence method exhibited considerably lower inhibition rates than the ECL method, potentially due to the influence of fluorescence effects. This hypothesis is supported by the fluorescence emission spectra of β-Sit, L-Cam, and L-Bor at 351 nm excitation, as depicted in Fig. 4c. These three compounds exhibited fluorescence absorption at 351 nm, which could result in false positive fluorescence results and lower inhibition rates.

Type of inhibition

Michaelis–Menten kinetics (Km) is a commonly used model to describe the enzymatic activity, expressed as the substrate concentration (S) at half of the maximum reaction rate (Vmax) of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction [37, 38]. However, in the determination of enzyme activity by ECL method, the number of electrons transported, the oxidation peak current (CV), and the ECL intensity are proportional to the substrate concentration. Therefore, Km should be constructed by the relationship between ECL intensity and substrate concentration [39]. The equation is as follows:

$${I}_{\left(\mathrm{ECL}\right)}=\frac{{I}_{\mathrm{max}\left(\mathrm{ECL}\right)}\left[S\right]}{{K}_{\mathrm{M}}^{\mathrm{app}}+\left[S\right]}$$
(2)

where Imax(ECL) is the maximum obtainable ECL intensity, [S] is the substrate concentration(mol·L−1), and \({K}_{\mathrm{M}}^{\mathrm{app}}\) is the apparent Michaelis − Menten constant.

The results are shown in the Fig. 4d. The \({K}_{\mathrm{M}}^{\mathrm{app}}\) of thrombin is 8.33 μM (purple curve), which is close to the result of 6.14 μM from the literature [40]. This finding suggests the possibility of using the estimated the \({K}_{\mathrm{M}}^{\mathrm{app}}\) value to evaluate thrombin activity. The data indicates that Arg, Iso, and Nep exhibit the same 1/ΔECL value when the substrate concentration is zero, suggesting that these three compounds belong to the class of competitive inhibitors. The inhibition constant Ki was calculated according to the following formula (3).

$${I}_{\left(\mathrm{ECL}\right)}=\frac{{I}_{\mathrm{max}\left(\mathrm{ECL}\right)}\left[S\right]}{{K}_{\mathrm{M}}^{\mathrm{app}}\left(1+\left[C\right]/{K}_{\mathrm{i}}^{\mathrm{app}}\right)+\left[S\right]}$$
(3)

where Imax(ECL) is the maximum obtainable ECL intensity, [S] is the substrate concentration (mol·L−1), \({K}_{\mathrm{M}}^{\mathrm{app}}\) is the apparent Michaelis − Menten constant, [C] is the inhibitor concentration, and \({K}_{i}^{app}\) is the inhibition constant.

The \({K}_{i}^{app}\) values of Arg, Iso, and Nep are 6.36 nM, 0.91 μM, and 2.18 μM, respectively. The \({K}_{i}^{app}\) value of Arg is close to 6.5 nM reported in the literature [41], which proves that the experimental results are reliable.

Molecular docking study

The molecular docking results of Arg, Iso, Nep, L-Cam, L-Bor, and thrombin are shown in Fig. S5. His 57, Trp 60D, Asn 98, Leu 99, Asp102, Ile 174, Asp 189, Ser 195, Gly 216, and Gly 219 are active amino acid residues in the active pocket of thrombin [42]. Arg had the ability to form hydrogen bonds with His 57, Ser 195, and Gly 216 of thrombin. Iso could form hydrogen bonds with the residues of Gly 216 and Gly 219, while Nep could form hydrogen bonds with Asp 189 and Ser 195. Similarly, L-Cam could form hydrogen bonds with Ser 195 and Gly 219, and L-Bor could form hydrogen bonds with Gly 216. These findings demonstrated that Iso, Nep, L-Cam, and L-Bor had the potential to interact with the key amino acid residues located in the thrombin active pocket, indicating their potential as antithrombotic agents.

Conclusion

It has been proved that the ECL sensor based on Ru@MXene and Fc@SiO2 can be used for determination of α-thrombin activity in human serum and screening direct thrombin inhibitor from compounds. However, the ECL biosensor has limitations in terms of high throughput continuous detection. Future research should focus on improving its capabilities for whole blood detection and spot rapid diagnosis. Additionally, further investigations are necessary to advance the development of these identified inhibitors into viable drug candidates, considering formulation, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology aspects.