Abstract
Purpose
The status of tube jejunostomy for feeding after major gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary surgery is being questioned because of concerns about procedure-related complications. This has led to a trend away from performing routine prophylactic tube jejunostomy.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 120 consecutive patients who underwent prophylactic tube jejunostomy as part of major gastrointestinal or pancreatobiliary surgery within a 2-year period at a tertiary referral center. The primary end-points were procedure-related morbidity and mortality. We also performed a subset analysis of the duration of enteral feeds and the need for parenteral nutrition (PN) in patients with complications related to the index surgery.
Results
There was no procedure-related mortality or major morbidity. Eight patients (6.7%) required supplementation with PN because enteral feeding failed to achieve the nutritional target. Patients who suffered complications required nutritional support for significantly longer (10.8 days vs 6.4 days; P < 0.001). The nutritional goal of 25 kcal/kg per day was attained with tube jejunostomy feeding in 82 (93%) of 84 patients without complications and in 30 (83%) of 36 patients with complications (P = 0.180).
Conclusions
Prophylactic tube jejunostomy is safe and can be performed with low procedure-related morbidity. When postoperative complications result in delayed or inadequate oral intake, nutritional requirements can be met through tube jejunostomy feeds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. BMJ 1994;308:945–948.
Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 2001;323:773–776.
Busch W. Bietarag sur Physiology der Verdanungsorgane. Virchows Arch Cell Pathol 1858;14:140–186.
Date RS, Clements WDB, Gilliland R. Feeding jejunostomy: is there enough evidence to justify its routine use? Dig Surg 2004;21:142–145.
Han-Geurts IJM, Verhoef C, Tilanus HW. Relaparotomy following complications of feeding jejunostomy in esophageal surgery. Dig Surg 2004;21:192–196.
Sonawane RN, Thombare MM, Kumar A, Sikora SS, Saxena R, Kapoor VK, et al. Technical complications of feeding jejunostomy: a critical analysis. Trop Gastroenterol 1997;18:127–128.
Zapas JL, Karakozis S, Kirkpatrick JR. Prophylactic jejunostomy: a reappraisal. Surgery 1998;124:715–720.
Green CJ. Existence, causes and consequences of disease related malnutrition in the hospital and the community and the financial benefits of nutritional intervention. Clin Nutr 1999;18(S2):3–38.
Braga M, Luca G, Andrea V, Andrea C, Pietro B, Valerio DC. Artificial nutrition after major abdominal surgery: impact of route of administration and composition of the diet. Crit Care Med 1998;26:24–30.
Bower RH, Talamini MA, Sax HC, Hamilton F, Fischer JE. Postoperative enteral vs parenteral nutrition. Arch Surg 1986;121:1040–1045.
Carr CS, Ling KDE, Boulos P, Singer M. Randomized trial of safety and efficacy of immediate postoperative enteral feeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection. BMJ 1996;312:869–871.
Gerndt SJ, Orringer MB. Tube jejunostomy as an adjunct to esophagectomy. Surgery 1994;115:164–169.
Myers JG, Page CP, Stewart RM, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR, Aust JB. Complications of needle catheter jejunostomy in 2,022 consecutive applications. Am J Surg 1995;170:547–551.
Sarr MG. Appropriate use, complications and advantages demonstrated in 500 consecutive needle catheter jejunostomies. Br J Surg 1999;86:557–561.
Tapia J, Murguia R, Garcia G, Monteros PE, Onate E. Jejunostomy: techniques, indications and complications. World J Surg 1999;23:596–602.
Adams MB, Seabrook GR, Quebbeman EA, Condon RE. Jejunostomy: a rarely indicated procedure. Arch Surg 1986;121:236–238.
Heslin MJ, Latkany L, Leung D, Brooks AD, Hochwald SN, Pisters PWT, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of early enteral feeding after resection of upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Ann Surg 1997;226:567–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramamurthy, A., Negi, S.S. & Chaudhary, A. Prophylactic tube jejunostomy: A worthwhile undertaking. Surg Today 38, 420–424 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3650-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3650-1