Introduction

The world is undergoing global burden of diabetes and its impact will continue to grow [1], the latest nationwide survey reported that the overall prevalence of diabetes among adults in China in 2013 was 10.9% [2], and it is 12.3% in the USA in 2011–2012 [3]. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the important microvascular complications in patients with diabetic mellitus (DM), ranking as the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [4, 5]. It is reported that, in the USA, the incidence of DN in renal biopsy patients has dramatically increased from 5.5% in the decade 1986–1995 to 19.1% in the decade 2006–2015 [6]. The widespread incidence craved our in-depth exploration to reduce socioeconomic burden of DN.

DN is characterized by glomerular basement membrane thickening, mesangial expansion, glomerulosclerosis, albuminuria and progressive reduction in kidney function [4]. The development of DN is genetically predisposed and influenced by many factors, such as prolonged high glucose, metabolic and hemodynamic factors. Cigarette smoking is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Some clinical researchers [7, 8] had emphasized that smoking aggravated the occurrence of macroalbuminuria and ESRD both in type 1 and type 2 DM patients with chronic kidney disease. But, the mechanism of cigarette smoking affecting the kidney is relatively complex. Recently, studies in physical examination individuals have suggested that smoking was associated with an increased risk of glomerular hyperfiltration, which is an early marker of kidney disease and proteinuria [9, 10]. And one study on T2DM patients with albuminuria found that compared with nonsmokers, current smoking patients had higher glomerular filtration rate [11]. But, the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy (DN) was based on clinical manifestations, and patients with non-diabetic renal disease may have been misdiagnosed with DN, potentially making the results less convincing [12, 13]. Moreover, the association between smoking and renal prognosis in T2DM patients with DN remains poorly stated.

Our present study intended to investigate the association between cigarette smoking and the clinicopathological features and renal prognosis of T2DM patients with biopsy-proven DN.

Materials and methods

Patients

A total of 525 patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent renal biopsy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2002 to April 2017 were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: T2DM with biopsy-proven DN, cigarette smoking status with the available amounts collected at the time of renal biopsy. Exclusion criteria were: coexistent systemic or other renal diseases, other types of DM, no cigarette smoking registration. And 105 female patients were excluded to reduce the effects of gender and data distribution because of only two female smokers. A total of 223 male patients were considered eligible and were enrolled in this study (Fig. 1). The diagnosis of T2DM was based on the American Diabetes Association criteria [14]. The general indications for kidney biopsy of patients with diabetes in our hospital were patients with diabetes with kidney damage who lacked absolute contraindications, especially those without diabetic retinopathy, those with obvious glomerular hematuria and/or sudden onset overt proteinuria, or patients with short diabetic duration (< 5 years) [15, 16]. DN was diagnosed by at least two renal pathologists and/or nephrologists, and the diagnosis was re-evaluated according to Tervaert’s classification [12, 17]. All the included patients were divided into two groups according to smoking status until biopsy: smokers and nonsmokers. Nonsmokers were defined as individuals who had never used tobacco, smokers had ever established chronic cigarette smokers. In the subgroup analysis, the patients were divided into two groups: (a) age ≤ 50 years and age > 50 years; (b) DN patients without DR and DN patients with DR. And in the supplement study: (a) smokers were divided into two groups of binary analysis based on smoking amounts; (b) smokers were divided into former smokers and current smokers, former smokers were those who quit smoking at least one months prior to registration. During the observation period from July 2002 to April 2018, the patients in this study were regularly followed up for at least one year at West China Hospital and their renal function and proteinuria were evaluated, presence of renal endpoint events, death or loss to follow-up was the end of follow-up. The composite endpoint of kidney was the doubling of baseline serum creatinine (D-SCr) level and/or progression to ESRD, which was defined by e-GFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or commencing the renal replacing therapy.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of study participants

Clinical and pathological characteristics

Baseline clinical and biochemical parameters were registered for each patient included at the time of renal biopsy: smoking status, age, gender, weight, height, blood pressure, duration of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy (DR). DR was defined as present if any of the following lesions was detected: microaneurysms, retinal hemorrhages, soft exudates, hard exudates, or vitreous hemorrhage. Fasting plasma glucose, blood lipids, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and serum albumin were measured using routine laboratory methods with a Hitachi 7600 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Simultaneously, 24-h proteinuria was obtained using a biochemistry autoanalyser (CobasIntera 400 Plus, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2) was computed according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. All renal biopsies were performed with patients’ consent. Tissue was obtained by needle biopsy and the specimens were then processed for light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy routinely to detect renal pathological changes. All patients were categorized based on the pathologic classification of the Renal Pathology Society in 2010 [17].

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software. The clinical and pathological characteristics as baseline were compared between the two groups. Numeric values were presented as mean ± standard deviation and range, differences in means were compared using Student’s t test or the Mann–Whitney test, as appropriate. Categorical values were presented as number (%) and the differences in proportions were analyzed using the Chi-square test. The influence of cigarette smoking on eGFR was evaluated by logistic regression analysis with or without adjusted other influence factors. The relationship between cigarette smoking and composite endpoint was assessed using Cox regression. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Baseline clinical and pathological characteristics

Of the 223 patients recruited in this study, there were 80 (35.87%) nonsmokers and 143 (64.13%) smokers. At baseline, the mean age was 51.45 ± 9.20 years, the median duration of T2DM was 7.33 years (range 0–30 years). The median 24-proteinuria was 5.67 g/day (range 0.04-27 g/day), the median serum creatinine level was 147.18 ± 86.87 µmol/L, and the median eGFR was 68.92 ± 34.41 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of biopsy. The median follow-up period was 16 months (12–79 months). During follow-up, 109 patients (48.88%) progression to composite endpoint including 88 patients (39.46%) progressed to ESRD from the time of renal biopsy. In terms of the IFTA [12], 10 patients (4.48%) were in grade 0, 105 (47.09%) in grade 1, 88 (39.46%) in grade 2, and 20 (8.97%) in grade 3. In addition, 97.09% patients had thickened glomerular basement membrane (GBM) with mean thickness of 864.81 nm. 97 (43.50%) patients had nodular glomerulosclerosis and 31(13.90%) patients had > 50% global sclerosis. The immune deposits in immunofluorescence were found in 87 patients (39.01%) and IgM deposit was the most common pattern (26.91%). Clinical characteristics of patients with different smoking status are shown in Table 1, and pathological characteristics are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants at baseline according to smoking habits
Table 2 Pathological findings according to smoking habits

Correlation between cigarette smoking and the clinicopathological features

Compared with patients of non-smoking, the patients of smoking had higher levels of eGFR (62.28 ± 32.71 vs. 72.58 ± 34.88, p = 0.032), lower levels of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in age, duration of diabetes, hypertension, blood lipid or 24-h proteinuria. As shown in Table 2, further analysis revealed that patients of smoking had more moderate IFTA score compared with patients of non-smoking (p = 0.033). But there were no differences in glomerular lesions, interstitial inflammation score or arteriolar hyalinosis between the two groups. And no differences were shown in immunofluorescence features or mean GBM thickness.

Cigarette smoking and eGFR in cross-sectional study

The risk for eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were determined by logistic regression analysis, as shown in Fig. 2. Unadjusted analyses indicated that age, serum creatine and urine protein were positively associated with the severe decline eGFR, cigarette smoking and hemoglobin were negatively associated with severe decline eGFR. Duration of diabetes ≥ 5 to < 10 years was significantly associated with mild decline eGFR compared with duration < 5 years or duration ≥ 10 years. Adjusted for age and risk factors of kidney, such as blood pressure, blood glucose and blood lipids, cigarette smoking was still significantly negatively associated with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.394, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.187–0.830, p = 0.014]. In the subgroup analysis of age ≤ 50 years, cigarette smoking was still significantly negatively associated with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR 0.391, 95% CI 0.171–0.893, p = 0.026) in the univariate analysis and (OR 0.263, 95% CI 0.076–0.731, p = 0.012) in the multivariate analysis adjusted for other risk factors of kidney. But no significant association between cigarette smoking and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was shown in the patients of age > 50 years (as shown in Fig. 3). In the subgroup analysis of DN patients with DR, we still found significant negative association between cigarette smoking and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR 0.279, 95% CI 0.113–0.687, p = 0.006) in the univariate analysis and (OR 0.192, 95% CI 0.054–0.677, p = 0.010) in the multivariate analysis adjusted for other risk factors. But no significant association was found between cigarette smoking and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the DN patients without DR, the results are shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Risk factors for eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in T2DM patients with DN

Fig. 3
figure 3

Risk factors for eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in age-based subgroups analysis of T2DM patients with DN

Fig. 4
figure 4

Risk factors for eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in DR-based subgroups analysis of T2DM patients with DN. DR diabetic retinopathy

Furthermore, the comparison between former smokers and current smokers suggested that the levels of fasting plasma glucose (7.23 ± 2.92 vs. 8.81 ± 4.69, p = 0.016) and the levels of triglycerides (1.67 ± 0.69 vs. 2.46 ± 2.12, p = 0.001) were lower vs. those in current smokers. Binary analysis based on smoking amounts revealed that patients with more smoking amounts bore higher levels of triglycerides (1.87 ± 1.24 vs. 2.54 ± 2.22, p = 0.030) (Supplement Table 1).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Renal survival rate between smokers and non-smokers of DN patients in Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. a The event-free survival for composite endpoints; b the event-free survival for ESRD

Cigarette smoking and renal outcome in longitudinal study

Survival curves of the composited endpoint and progression to ESRD are presented in Fig. 5. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log-rank test) indicated that the overall 1-year renal survival rate was 72.1% in smokers and 55.6% in nonsmokers for ESRD and 69.9% in smokers and 55.6% in nonsmokers for composite endpoint. The risks for composite endpoint were determined by Cox proportional hazards model. As shown in Fig. 6, univariate analysis indicated that lower levels of serum albumin (HR 0.967, 95% CI 0.943–0.992, p = 0.011), lower levels of hemoglobin (HR 0.987, 95% CI 0.978–0.995, p = 0.002), lower baseline eGFR (HR 0.980, 95% CI 0.972–0.988, p < 0.01), more severe urine protein (HR 1.059, 95% CI 1.020–1.100, p = 0.003), higher levels of serum creatinine (HR 1.005, 95% CI 1.003–1.007, p < 0.01) and higher glomerular class (HR 1.349, 95% CI 1.064–1.711, p = 0.013) were all significantly associated with a poorer prognosis. However, cigarette smoking was not a risk factor for the renal outcomes (HR 1.013, 95% CI 0.673–1.525, p = 0.950) either in univariate analysis or (HR 1.187, 95% CI 0.764–1.844, p = 0.446) in multivariate analysis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Risks for composite endpoint determined by univariate/multivariate COX hazard analysis. Composite endpoint was defined as the doubling of baseline serum creatinine (D-SCr) level or progression to ESRD (n = 109). SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association between cigarette smoking and renal clinicopathological characteristics and renal prognosis in a large sample of patients with renal biopsy-proven T2DM-associated DN. The results revealed that the smoking patients had more moderate decline GFR and IFTA lesions than non-smoking patients, while no differences were shown in otherwise clinicopathological features. Moreover, the adjusted logistic regression analysis suggested cigarette smoking was negatively associated with more severe decline eGFR, especially for DN patients with DR and young patients (age ≤ 50 years) as shown in subgroup analysis. Interestingly, it was observed that former smokers had lower levels of plasma glucose and triglycerides than current smokers, while smokers with small smoking amounts had lower levels of triglycerides than those with large smoking amounts.

These findings give further insights into the potential association between smoking and kidney function in male patients with T2DM and DN. Several studies have reported that smoking was associated with hyperfiltration in general population [9, 10]. And a longitudinal study showed that the decline of eGFR in cigarette smokers were smaller than those in nonsmokers, indicating that cigarette smoking might have a modifiable impact on eGFR [18]. Similarly, in this study, we found that smoking patients of T2DM with DN had more moderate decline eGFR and milder IFTA lesions, nonetheless, the levels of proteinuria was comparable in the two groups. One previous study in T2DM patients with albuminuria was performed by Baggio et al. [11], they had indicated that smokers had higher GFR than nonsmokers but no significant results in the index of interstitial fibrosis was found, probably because of a limited sample size of 96 cases. In our study, we enrolled 223 biopsy-proven DN patients and made a more convincing evaluation of the association between smoking and renal clinicopathological characteristics. Otherwise, we first evaluated renal prognosis, and an obviously significant risk factor was not shown about smoking for DN. It was observed that smoking cessation or less smoking had protective effect for hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia in our study. As hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia were all risk factors for the development of DN [19, 20], limited cigarette smoking might be suggested for DN patients. These interesting findings in our study based on the association between cigarette smoking and moderate decline eGFR in DN patients might imply that for DN patients at early stage cigarette smoking was a risk factor, on the contrary, cigarette smoking might increase renal perfusion and improve renal ischemia and hypoxia via higher eGFR in late stage of DN.

Nicotine is distilled from burning tobacco, an average tobacco rod contains 10–14 mg of nicotine and about 1–1.5 mg of nicotine is absorbed through mouth or small airways and alveoli of the lung systemically during smoking [21,22,23,24]. In a recent study, the average nicotine concentration after smoking a cigarette was 10.9 ng/mL in smokers [25]. Nicotine is extensively metabolized to a number of metabolites, in humans, about 70–80% of nicotine is converted to cotinine. Based on human autopsy samples from smokers, most attractive organs for nicotine are lung, liver, spleen, and kidney. Liver is the major metabolic organ of nicotine and it is excreted by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion depended on urinary pH [26].

The mechanism of how cigarette smoking influence glomerular filtration rate is unclear. Insulin resistance [27, 28] and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) synthesis and activation [29] caused by smoking might contribute to glomerular hyperfiltration in early stage kidney disease. Some interesting reports on the acute effect of smoking on GFR showed that GFR and renal plasma flow fell in healthy volunteers after smoking two cigarettes, but, smoking three cigarettes per hour during a 5.5-h period induced no variation of GFR in type 1 diabetic patients who had been smoking for several years [30, 31]. Similar effects of 4 mg of nicotine gum on BP and GFR were observed by Halimi et al. [32]. Early experiments in mammals demonstrated that low doses of nicotine increased the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urine volume, and sodium excretion because of nicotine-induced catecholamine release [33], but higher doses resulted in increased arterial BP and decreased GFR [34].

On the other hand, chronic exposure to nicotine might be associated with structural modifications of kidney architecture involving vascularization, extracellular matrix, and inflammation mediated through nicotinic receptor activation. Renal endothelial cells express nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), and it is reported that nicotine stimulates angiogenesis and that this is mediated through activation of the α7nAChR [35]. Diabetic nodular sclerosis is a unique pathological type related to endothelial disease, and nicotine might be such an angiogenic factor responsible for nodular neovascularization [36]. In addition to angiogenesis, nicotine increases expression of matrix metalloproteinases [37] and decreases inflammation through activation of α7nAChR [38] and in such a way may potentially ameliorate some forms of glomerulosclerosis.

In the recent years, epidemiological studies concluded that smoking is an important risk factor for development of proteinuria and diabetic nephropathy [39, 40] and evolution of chronic kidney disease to ESRD [41, 42]. Associated mechanisms included hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic factors, such as inflammation, reactive oxygen species (ROSs) production and angiogenesis. It has been stressed that the effects of cigarette smoking in the progression of chronic kidney disease were mediated by activations of specific nAChRs [43]. KARL et al. figured out that cigarette smoking exhibits its deleterious effect on the kidneys primarily through damage of small interlobular arteries [44]. And a review [45] stated that cigarette smoking induced morphological alterations of the microcirculation at different vascular levels, which can cause severe and widespread damage such as atherosclerotic lesion and microvascular damage. But, at present, there is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the role of nicotine abuse as a risk factor in patients with primary renal disease [46]. It is important to consider the fact that cigarette smoke contains several harmful compounds, including nicotine, and hence some of the adverse effects noted in human subjects may not be completely attributable to nicotine. On the contrary, Agarwal et al. argued that long-term oral treatment with nicotine preserves renal function and reduces inflammation in a rat model of progressive kidney disease [47]. Currently, the treatment of diabetic nephropathy is relatively limited with RAS blockers, and we cannot afford to disregard any approach that may appear promising to slow the progression of kidney disease.

Some certain limitations of this study should be noted. First, we did not find any significant differences in renal function between former smokers and current smokers, possibly because of limited sample size of smoking patients. Second, no significant results were shown in prognosis analysis, and the follow-up data of eGFR is not well recorded to define the outcomes as a 30% decline of eGFR to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, future research still needs to be done. Third, we did not study female patients because of their limited number of smokers. Fourth, we did not analyze the effects of smoking metabolites on the kidneys as the role of cigarette smoking is complicated.

In summary, our data found that cigarette smoking was negatively associated with more severe decline eGFR in patients with T2DM and DN, especially for young DN patients with DR. although the significant results in renal outcomes were not obvious in our study.