Abstract
Tactile sensing is crucial sensory feedback that helps humans and robots to perceive their surroundings in a better way. The performance of a prosthetic hand is severely restricted by the scant tactile information provided by their sensors in contrast to the extensive tactile feedback of the human hand which has mechanoreceptors and capable of detecting both static and dynamic stimulus. Previous studies were mostly limited to detecting static stimulus and low frequency dynamic stimulus. However, some are capable of measuring both static and dynamic stimulus, but they are costly and unable to measure stimulus in frequency range of mechanoreceptors. A novel bio-mimicking tactile sensor with the ability to detect both static and dynamic forces in the frequency range of mechanoreceptors is presented in this paper. Proposed sensor design is inspired by human touch sensing receptors and targeted for use in upper limb prosthetics. A piezoelectric material is used for measuring dynamic stimulus in the sensor, whereas for evaluating static stimulus, principle of differential capacitance is utilized. A mathematical model is developed, and finite element analysis is performed using COMSOL, so that natural frequency of the sensor lies in the range of Ruffini endings (slow adapting receptor) and Pacinian corpuscles (fast adapting receptor). Results show that the first frequency of the beam is 324 Hz, which lies in the sensing range of Ruffini endings and Pacinian corpuscles. Sensor shows more than 99% agreement when results are validated by comparing eigenfrequency analysis and analytical model. The present research offers design of a bio-mimicking tactile sensor for a prosthetic hand, which is expected to incorporate prosthetic hand with touch sensing capabilities closer to that of a human hand.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Tactile sensing is an important area in the field of robotics (Kappassov et al. 2015; Silvera-Tawil et al. 2015; Yousef et al. 2011) and prosthetics as it gives the sense of touch to a prosthetic arm. Human and robots utilize tactile sensing to interact with the environment. When a human hand grasps something, tactile feedback helps a human to grasp objects with precise control. Without feedback signal from the tactile sensor, it is exceedingly difficult to manipulate different types of fragile object with precise control.
In order to equip robots with better tactile sensing capabilities, researchers have built different types of tactile sensors using the transduction techniques such as thermoresistive, inductive, piezoelectric, capacitive, magnetic, and optical (Yousef et al. 2011; Najarian et al. 2009; Wei and Xu 2015; Zou et al. 2017). Among these transduction techniques, some have the ability to detect static stimuli (Pan et al. 2014), whereas some have the ability to detect dynamic stimulus (Cutkosky and Ulmen 2014; Howe and Cutkosky 1993). For example, the capacitive transduction technique can detect static stimulus (Ko et al. 2006) and piezoelectric materials can identify dynamic stimulus (Qasaimeh et al. 2009; Tiwana et al. 2016). MEMS-based capacitive tactile sensor developed using bulk micromachining also got much attention due to its spatial resolution and its diminished size. However, the cost associated with the fabrication process makes it uneconomical for the low volumes (Chu et al. 1996). Table 1 summarizes tactile sensors with different transduction technique.
In our experimental work (Tiwana et al. 2011) we proposed a state of art cantilever based tactile sensor design which works on the principle of differential capacitance and can measure the shear forces. The fabricated sensor has a good sensitivity and most salient feature is that it can be manufactured at very low cost for both low and high volumes. The fabricated sensor can be used in robotics and prosthetics field. However, the limitation is that it can only detect static forces or low-frequency dynamic forces in the range of 100 Hz.
To make a prosthetic arm that works effectively, it must be able to imitate the tactile sensing capabilities of human hand. Human touch receptors have the ability to detect both static and dynamic forces. In human glabrous skin, there are sensory receptors which respond to mechanical deformation, these receptors are known as mechanoreceptors (Dahiya et al. 2010; Johansson and Vallbo 1979; Dario et al. 2003), which transduce the magnitude and direction of forces, these sensors provide feedback to the brain. Without feedback from the tactile interface related to the amount of incipient slip and shear force present, it is difficult, firstly, to approximate the required amount of grip force and, secondly, to control the magnitude of the applied grip force to safely manipulate a given object (Tiwana et al. 2012).
There are basically four kind of different tactile sensors in the human body, which are the Merkel cells, Meissner corpuscles, Ruffini endings and Pacinian corpuscles (Girão et al. 2013; Johnson 2001). These four types of tactile sensor can be grouped further into two groups, static stimulus and dynamic stimulus (Romano et al. 2011). Merkel cells and Ruffini endings are sensitive to low vibrations or static load, Meissner corpuscles are very effective for spotting light touch, for identifying high-frequency vibration Pacinian corpuscles are used. Merkel cells and Ruffini endings lie in the group of slow adapting receptors, whereas, Meissner corpuscles and Pacinian corpuscles lie in the group of fast adapting receptors, frequency range of Ruffini endings and Pacinian corpuscles is discussed in Table 2.
Here, we report design of a multimodal bio-mimicking tactile sensor, which endeavors to overcome these limitations, sensor utilizes differential capacitance to detect static stimulus and piezoelectric material to detect high-frequency dynamic stimulus, sensor is mimicking the functionality of human touch receptors in terms of frequency.
2 Methods
2.1 Design
The proposed model is the improved shape of our experimental model (Tiwana et al. 2011), proposed sensor as shown in Fig. 1, consists of a trilayer cantilever beam, in which center layer is of ZnO, which is a piezoelectric material, whereas, the layers along both sides are copper layers. There is a base plate on which cantilever is fixed. Copper pads are placed at some distance from the cantilever beam on both sides, which forms a differential capacitor. The dimensions of the sensor are optimized with the help of the parametric sweep function in the COMSOL, both the length and width of the sensor are swept to get the optimized geometry so that the response of the sensor remains in the desired frequency range. The dimensions of the proposed sensor are as follows: The cantilever beam has a length of 40 mm and width of 3 mm, whereas, the thickness of copper layer is 0.2 mm and of the piezoelectric layer is 0.4 mm.
For a better perspective, two-dimensional view of the model is shown in Fig. 1b, so that all the features can be viewed distinctly. Top view of the sensor is shown in Fig. 2, the dimension of various aspects are a = 20 mm, b = 5 mm, d1 = 4.6 mm, d2 = 4.6 mm and w = 3 mm. A bio-mimicking sensor should vibrate on the same frequency as that of mechanoreceptor to replicate it, for this purpose, eigenfrequency analysis is performed. In order to verify the results, three different methods are used i.e., analytical approach, harmonic analysis approach and FEM modeling using COMSOL.
It is also proposed that the trilayer beam has to be covered with a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) based addition curing silicone elastomer, this will increase the dynamic range of the sensor as an addition of a PDMS layer will increase the flexibility of copper ribbon (Ryspayeva et al. 2019). One of the ways to enhance the capacitance of a capacitive sensor is to increase the value of the dielectric constant (Qin et al. 2021), the PDMS layer on the sensor will enhance the capacitance of the sensor as its dielectric constant is much higher than air, In addition the PDMS layer also helps the copper beam to damp the frequency whereas the magnitude of damping depends on the hardness of the elastomer layer, the sensor with elastomer on the beam is shown in Fig. 3.
2.2 Working principle
Whenever a mechanical stimulus is applied on the trilayer cantilever beam it deflects due to the applied force, if the applied force is a static force it can identified by a change in differential capacitance, whereas, if the applied stimulus is dynamic then it can be detected through the piezoelectric material. Piezoelectric material is a material which produces a voltage when experiences a mechanical deflection. It is very popular in tactile sensing application as it is capable of identifying high-frequency dynamic stimulus and due to its stability and workability (Flanagan and Wing 1993), mathematical expression for measuring voltage is given below in Eq. 1.
A cantilever-based sensor of length l, young modulus E and moment of inertia of cantilever I, will experience a voltage v upon the application of a force F on the cantilever.
3 Calculation
3.1 Analytical model
An analytical model has been developed and verified using COMSOL model. Eigenfrequency analysis is performed to find out the natural frequencies of the sensing beam. The mathematical expression for finding eigenfrequency is given in Eq. 2.
where l is the length and m represent mass, EI is flexural modulus, \(V_{n}\) is the fundamental mode of frequency whose value varies for different modes of frequency, which are 1.875, 4.694, 7.853, 10.995, 14.137, and 17.279. All the six fundamental modes of frequencies can be calculated using the Eq. 2.
For finding flexural modulus of a multi-layer composite, classic beam theory is applied (Du et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2005), derived from Timoshenko equation (Timoshenko and Young 1968), flexural modulus for tri layer cantilever beam is given in Eq. 3.
where \({m}_{2}\) is height ratio of piezoelectric material to copper and \({n}_{2}\) is Young's modulus ratio of piezoelectric material and copper.
\({m}_{3}\) is height ratio of copper to copper and \({n}_{3}\) is Young's modulus ratio of copper material and copper.
where m is the equivalent mass of all layers of trilayer cantilever beam.
All the material properties required for finding the flexural modulus of a tri-layer cantilever beam are provided in Table 3.
The differential capacitance technique is used for measuring static stimulus because of its effectiveness and ability to find the direction of applied stimulus.
A be the area of the beam, r is the separation between the plates, \(\in_{0}\) is absolute permittivity, \(\in_{r}\) is relative permittivity, w is width and H is the height of the beam,\(\Delta d_{1}\) and \(\Delta d_{2}\) are displacements on both sides.
where \({\mathrm{dC}}_{1}\) and \({\mathrm{dC}}_{2}\) are small differential capacitance.
Hence, for both capacitors, capacitances are \(C_{1}\) and \(C_{2}\).
Equation below represents the differential capacitance.
3.2 Finite element method COMSOL model
A finite element model of the system is established using COMSOL. Analysis is performed using eigenfrequency study. A mesh is created with 41,401 domain tetrahedral elements and 194,259 number of degrees of freedom for the COMSOL model as shown in Fig. 4. First six fundamental frequencies of the trilayer cantilever beam are found using the eigenfrequency analysis.
4 Results
The eigenfrequency analysis (Muthalif and Nordin 2015), of trilayer cantilever beam is performed using COMSOL. All the six fundamental modes of the tri-layer cantilever beam are shown in the Fig. 5 with their modal frequencies.
Harmonic analysis of the tri-layer cantilever beam is performed using COMSOL by plotting frequency against displacement. It is good for determining the eigenfrequency and to verify whether these frequencies are resonant or anti-resonant. Six resonant frequencies (Beatty 2006), are represented by the positive peaks in Fig. 6.
A comparative analysis is performed in which the results of eigenfrequency analysis of the trilayer cantilever beam are verified using analytical model and harmonic analysis, which shows a good match, there is a small difference in the analytical and COMSOL results, this is because COMSOL caters for bonding between the layers, damping and temperature effects, whereas, analytical model does not cater for these things. A comparison between the COMSOL, analytical and harmonic analysis results is given below in Table 4 along with their relative error.
A comparison between the COMSOL, analytical and harmonic analysis results is shown in Fig. 7.
The capacitance of the sensor as shown in Fig. 8, is predicted through mathematical expression for differential capacitance.
The first eigenfrequency of the beam is below 400 Hz, which lies in the sensing range of Ruffini endings (Büscher et al. 2015; Chorley, et al. 2009) (slow adapting receptor) and Pacinian corpuscles (Büscher et al. 2015; Chorley, et al. 2009) (fast adapting receptor), so both sensing parts of the proposed sensor can detect stimulus in the frequency range of mechanoreceptors.
To check the feasibility of the proposed sensor, the stress analysis has been performed by using the parametric sweep function in COMSOL, a range of forces has been applied to the sensor, and from the results it was found that ± 2 N force range is safe to apply on the structure, as the stresses generated in the structure in that range are less than the yield strength of both copper and ZnO, which depicts that this magnitude of the force is safe and it will not damage the structure. The Yield strength of Copper is 333.4 MPa and that of ZnO is 0.412 ± 0.05 GPa (Ong et al. 2003).Results of stress analysis are shown in Fig. 9.
5 Discussion
5.1 Benefits
The purpose of this research is to improve the design of a previously stated sensor (Tiwana et al. 2011), which have the advantage of detecting static stimulus (Muhammad et al. 2011; Restagno et al. 2001; Dargahi et al. 2006) and low frequency dynamic stimulus (Tiwana et al. 2011]. The aforementioned sensor utilizes differential capacitance technique (Tiwana et al. 2011) and can be fabricated at low cost for both low and high volumes but the inadequacy of the design is that it caters for only low dynamic frequencies (Restagno et al. 2001), whereas, the proposed design is capable of detecting both the static and high dynamic frequency (Cutkosky and Ulmen 2014; Son et al. 1994; Dargahi and Najarian 2004), which is its advantage over previously reported sensor (Tiwana et al. 2011).
5.2 Limitations
The sensor uses a single trilayer cantilever beam as a sensing element which can mimic only one resonant frequency of the biological counterpart, whereas, cantilevers of different lengths can be utilized so that output can be used from different cantilever beams depending upon the resonant frequency in the range.
6 Conclusions
The proposed sensor has outperformed cantilever-based state of the art tactile sensor by achieving an improvement in sensing frequency range from 100 to 324 Hz by incorporating piezoelectric layer in the beam for measuring high frequency dynamic stimulus. The eigenfrequency analysis of the trilayer cantilever beam matches well with the analytical and harmonic analysis. Model of the bio mimicking tactile sensor is presented in the paper so that researchers related to prosthetics field can use it for further fabrication of the sensor using MEMS techniques.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during the study is included in this published article.
References
Ahmad Ridzuan NA, Miki N (2019) Tooth-inspired tactile sensor for detection of multidirectional force. Micromachines. 10(1):18
Beatty MF (2006) The Foundation Principles of Classical Mechanics. Principles of Engineering Mechanics. Springer, pp 3–94
Büscher GH et al (2015) Flexible and stretchable fabric-based tactile sensor. Robot Auton Syst 63:244–252
Chorley, C., et al. Development of a tactile sensor based on biologically inspired edge encoding. in Advanced Robotics, 2009. ICAR 2009. International Conference on. 2009. IEEE.
Chu Z, Sarro P, Middelhoek S (1996) Silicon three-axial tactile sensor. Sens Actuators, A 54(1–3):505–510
Cutkosky MR, Ulmen J (2014) Dynamic tactile sensing. The Human Hand as an Inspiration for Robot Hand Development. Springer, pp 389–403
Dahiya RS et al (2010) Tactile sensing—from humans to humanoids. IEEE Trans Rob 26(1):1–20
Dargahi J, Najarian S (2004) Theoretical and experimental analysis of a piezoelectric tactile sensor for use in endoscopic surgery. Sens Rev 24(1):74–83
Dargahi J et al (2006) Design and microfabrication of a hybrid piezoelectric-capacitive tactile sensor. Sens Rev 26(3):186–192
Dario P et al (2003) Biologically-inspired microfabricated force and position mechano-sensors. Sensors and sensing in biology and engineering. Springer, pp 109–125
Du P, Lin X, Zhang X (2010) A multilayer bending model for conducting polymer actuators. Sens Actuators, A 163(1):240–246
Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1993) Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements. Exp Brain Res 95(1):131–143
Girão PS et al (2013) Tactile sensors for robotic applications. Measurement 46(3):1257–1271
Howe RD, Cutkosky MR (1993) Dynamic tactile sensing: perception of fine surface features with stress rate sensing. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 9(2):140–151
Johansson RS, Vallbo A (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol 286(1):283–300
Johnson KO (2001) The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11(4):455–461
Joo Y-B et al (2019) Development of an electrostatic beat module for various tactile sensations in touch screen devices. Appl Sci 9(6):1229
Kappassov Z, Corrales J-A, Perdereau V (2015) Tactile sensing in dexterous robot hands. Robot Auton Syst 74:195–220
Ko C-T, Tseng S-H, Lu MS-C (2006) A CMOS micromachined capacitive tactile sensor with high-frequency output. J Microelectromech Syst 15(6):1708–1714
Lee S-Y, Ko B, Yang W (2005) Theoretical modeling, experiments and optimization of piezoelectric multimorph. Smart Mater Struct 14(6):1343
Liu, W., et al. PVDF-based biomimetic sensor for application in crawling soft-body mini-robots. in 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2006. IEEE.
Muhammad H et al (2011) Development of a bioinspired MEMS based capacitive tactile sensor for a robotic finger. Sens Actuators, A 165(2):221–229
Muthalif AG, Nordin ND (2015) Optimal piezoelectric beam shape for single and broadband vibration energy harvesting: modeling, simulation and experimental results. Mech Syst Signal Process 54:417–426
Najarian, S., J. Dargahi, and A. Mehrizi, Artificial tactile sensing in biomedical engineering. 2009: McGraw Hill Professional.
Ong CW et al (2003) Tensile strength of zinc oxide films measured by a microbridge method. J Mater Res 18(10):2464–2472
Pan L et al (2014) An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. Nat Commun 5:3002
Qasaimeh MA et al (2008) PVDF-based microfabricated tactile sensor for minimally invasive surgery. J Microelectromech Syst 18(1):195–207
Qasaimeh MA et al (2009) PVDF-based microfabricated tactile sensor for minimally invasive surgery. J Microelectromech Syst 18(1):195–207
Qin R et al (2021) A new strategy for the fabrication of a flexible and highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensor. Microsyst Nanoeng 7(1):100
Restagno F et al (2001) A new capacitive sensor for displacement measurement in a surface-force apparatus. Meas Sci Technol 12(1):16
Romano JM et al (2011) Human-inspired robotic grasp control with tactile sensing. IEEE Trans Rob 27(6):1067–1079
Ryspayeva A et al (2019) A rapid technique for the direct metallization of PDMS substrates for flexible and stretchable electronics applications. Microelectron Eng 209:35–40
Silvera-Tawil D, Rye D, Velonaki M (2015) Artificial skin and tactile sensing for socially interactive robots: a review. Robot Auton Syst 63:230–243
Son, JS., EA. Monteverde, and RD. Howe. A tactile sensor for localizing transient events in manipulation. in Robotics and Automation, 1994. Proceedings., 1994 IEEE International Conference on. 1994. IEEE.
Timoshenko S, Young D (1968) Elements of Strength of Materials. D. Van Nostrand, New York
Tiwana MI et al (2011) Characterization of a capacitive tactile shear sensor for application in robotic and upper limb prostheses. Sens Actuators, A 165(2):164–172
Tiwana MI, Redmond SJ, Lovell NH (2012) A review of tactile sensing technologies with applications in biomedical engineering. Sens Actuators, A 179:17–31
Tiwana MI et al (2016) Bio-Inspired PVDF-based, mouse whisker mimicking, tactile sensor. Appl Sci 6(10):297
Wei Y, Xu Q (2015) An overview of micro-force sensing techniques. Sens Actuators, A 234:359–374
Yahud, S., et al. Experimental validation of a polyvinylidene fluoride sensing element in a tactile sensor. in 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. 2010. IEEE.
Yousef H, Boukallel M, Althoefer K (2011) Tactile sensing for dexterous in-hand manipulation in robotics—a review. Sens Actuators, A 167(2):171–187
Zou L et al (2017) Novel tactile sensor technology and smart tactile sensing systems: a review. Sensors 17(11):2653
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, S.K.H., Tiwana, M.I., Tiwana, M.I. et al. Design and analysis of bio-mimicking tactile sensor for upper limb prosthesis. Microsyst Technol 29, 1671–1679 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-023-05540-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-023-05540-8