Abstract
Purpose
Lymphedema (LE) is a common complication after breast cancer treatment, which negatively affects the quality of life (QOL). Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment (HBOT) is an established treatment for radiation-induced tissue injury, but evidence of effect on breast cancer-related LE is inconclusive. We aimed to explore effects of HBOT on early breast cancer-related LE and the implications for QOL.
Methods
We invited women with breast cancer treated with surgery, axillary dissection and radiotherapy, who had participated in a randomized controlled trial and who presented with LE 1 year after surgery. In a prospective observational study design, change in LE was assessed with perometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and lymphoscintigraphy, and QOL by validated self-report scales. Participants were offered 40 sessions of HBOT on every weekday for 8 weeks and were followed for 6 months.
Results
Out of 50 eligible participants, 20 women accepted participation. Nineteen women initiated and completed treatment and follow-up. None of the objective measures of LE severity showed consistent changes during the study period, but participants reported significant improvements in QOL (physical functioning, fatigue, insomnia and breast and arm symptoms), with improvements peaking at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion
Participants receiving HBOT experienced improved QOL without consistently significant changes in arm mass, volume or lymphatic drainage. These results call for studies into differential effect in patient sub-groups, and a large-scale, randomized placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up to assess the effect of HBOT in patients with soft tissue radiation injuries after breast cancer seems warranted.
Trial registration
Danish Health and Medicines Authority, EUDRACT no. 2015–000,604-25 Ethical committee of the Capitol Region, No. R96-A6604-14-S22.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Patients with breast cancer (BC) may undergo a treatment combination of surgery involving axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy. All three treatments increase the risk of lymphedema (LE) development [1, 2] which affects up to 60% of survivors [3]. The negative consequences for quality of life (QOL) and physical function are well established [2, 4–6]. To date, there is no effective cure for LE [7], and patients are dependent on compression garments and specialist treatments for containing the symptoms and maintaining physical function [8, 9]. Patients with LE may also experience a number of additional treatment side effects, such as pain, shoulder dysfunction, skin fibrosis and sometimes necrosis. Furthermore, problems with cognition, fatigue, physical function and psychological wellbeing constitute a substantial burden which leads to reduced QOL [10, 11]. Limiting the impact of treatment side effects has paramount importance due to the increasing population of long-term BC survivors.
LE is characterized by the accumulation of extracellular fluid in the affected body area. When filtration of lymph into the interstitial space exceeds the ability of the lymphatic system to drain the lymph back into the blood stream, it results in progressive swelling and chronic tissue inflammation. In long-standing LE, the accumulated fluid leads to the formation of fatty fibrotic tissue, at which point the LE may be considered irreversible [8]. The strongest treatment-related risk factors are ALND, radiotherapy and taxane-based chemotherapy, whereas modifiable risk factors include obesity and physical inactivity [12].
Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment (HBOT) may be used for the treatment of pelvic radiation-induced tissue injury such as osteonecrosis, skin necrosis, haemorrhagic cystitis or proctitis [13–16]. Further, a prospective study showed improvements in, e.g. pain, swelling and hypersensitivity in patients participating in HBOT (n = 57) [17]. The few previous studies examining the effect of HBOT on BC-related LE have shown an overall poor treatment potential with respect to changes in LE arm volume, possibly due to inclusion of patients with chronic and thus irreversible changes caused by LE and small sample sizes [18–21]. However, when considering the physiological effects that HBOT initiates, such as neovascularization, re-organization and reduction of fibrous tissue as well as an increase in the number of lymphatic vessels in the sub-epithelial irradiated area [22, 23], it is possible that HBOT can reduce LE in the early stages where tissue changes have not yet become irreversible. Furthermore, HBOT has been shown to improve QOL in patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy [24]. This calls for an explorative trial using objective LE measurements in combination with patient-reported symptoms and QOL to investigate the effect of HBOT from different perspectives [17, 21, 25].
Accordingly, this study aimed to examine if an early intervention with HBOT could reduce the extent of arm volume and improve lymphatic drainage along with improving overall QOL in women with BC-related LE who had received ALND and radiotherapy 1 year prior to HBOT intervention.
Methods
Study design and population
The present study is an explorative one arm clinical trial. Participants were recruited from LYCA, a multi-centre RCT that examined the effect of progressive resistance training in women with primary unilateral BC who had undergone surgery with ALND followed by radiotherapy [26, 27]. Eligibility for participation in the current explorative trial was determined by the presence of clinically relevant LE at LYCA study end. We used the same definitions of LE as in the original multi-centre RCT and defined clinical relevance by > 2 points for swelling/heaviness/tightness on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), manifestation of swelling in clinical examination (pitting, skin thickness, bony landmarks and visibility of veins), and finally ≥ 3% increase in interlimb volume difference between the affected versus the unaffected arm from 2 weeks post-surgery to 1-year follow-up [28–31].
Upon final LYCA assessment and confirmation that clinically relevant lymphedema was present, patients were informed verbally and in written about the HBOT trial. All consenting patients were checked for contraindications (pregnancy, undrained pneumothorax, inability to equalize ear pressure in spite of drain treatment, untreated severe heart failure and claustrophobia not resolvable using mild anxiolytics). The HBOT treatment regime consisted of 40 days of pressure exposures performed on every weekday for 8 weeks in a multi-place hyperbaric chamber at Rigshospitalet. One treatment session consisted of a 5-min compression period, followed by 90 min at 2.4 atmosphere absolute (ATA) and finally a 5-min decompression period. Oxygen breathing was administered by means of a transparent o-ring sealed hood (model Amron®) ensuring spontaneous breathing with 100% oxygen (inspiratory oxygen fraction = 1.0).
The study was approved by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority, EUDRACT no. 2015–000,604-25, and the ethical committee of the Capitol Region, No. R96-A6604-14-S22, and was monitored by an independent unit for Good Clinical Practice [32].
Measurements
Figure 1 shows the timeline for treatment and measurements in the study period.
Dual-energy X-ray scans (DXA) were performed and the % Inter Limb Soft Tissue Mass Difference (% ILMD) was calculated as the difference between limbs relative to the unaffected arm. The accuracy of DXA to detect changes in the affected arm total volume has been reported to be 1.2% [33]. DXA measurements were carried out with a Lunar iDXA scanner (ME + 210,770) (Madison, WI, USA) using Encore software version 16 and the small animal software (medium 2–20 kg) as described by Gjørup et al. [34, 35].
Quantitative lymphoscintigraphy assessed lymph transport by injecting a technetium-99 m labelled radiopharmaceutical (Nanocoll, GE Healthcare, IT) into the digital fossa between the second and third fingers on the dorsum of both hands. Lymphoscintigraphy has been found to have high sensitivity (96%) and specificity (100%) ({Hassanein, 2017 #837}REF). Planar images were taken at t = 0 h and t = 2 h using a dual-head gamma camera. In an attempt to find the most appropriate procedure for the quantitative lymphoscintigraphy measurements, we included a resistance exercise session between t = 0 and t = 2 h for the first 9 participants and usual care (allowed to walk around but not leave the premises) for the remaining 10 participants. All patients were instructed to limit the intake of diuretic fluids and avoid using compression garments on the same day prior to the measurements. Lymph transport was measured as the decrease in activity in the identical Regions of Interest of the hands. The images at t = 2 h assessed whether the affected arm had diffuse activity (i.e. organised lymphedema) or axillary lymph node concentrated activity (i.e. normal).
Perometry assessed limb volume using the Perometer 400 T (Pero-system Messgeräte GmbH, Germany), which is an optoelectronic volume approximation method, where infrared light blocked by the limb allows a software algorithm to estimate the surface area of the arm [36]. Measurements were taken on the affected arm and recorded in millilitres. Due to lack of coordination of measurements taken by different hospital departments, we were not able to present inter-limb volume measurements by perometry. The positioning of the patient was standardized with the patient sitting on an adjustable chair holding onto a standard block-weight positioned within a marked area.
We used validated scales for the assessment of symptoms and QOL.
Lymph-ICF (upper limb module) scale was used to assess the functional limitations in patients with LE, and scores reflect a percentage of the maximum score for the subscales of physical function, mental function, housework, mobility and movement, social function and a total for all subscales collectively [37]. A higher score reflects worse function.
Health-related QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC) core scale (C30) and BC specific scale (BR23) [38, 39]. Scores are given as a percentage of maximum and for function subscales higher score is better whereas for symptom subscales higher score is worse.
Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Symptom Check List-92 [40] and Major Depression Inventory [41, 42], respectively. A higher score represents worse mental health.
Fatigue was assessed with the validated Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—fatigue scale (FACIT-f) [43], which is a 13-item stand-alone scale where the maximum score is 52, and the higher the score, the lower the level of fatigue.
Pain was assessed using a content-validated questionnaire [44] including specific questions regarding the affected area (breast area, side of the thorax, axilla or arm on the operated side), pain intensity reported on NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), and we classified participants as having pain if it was experienced on a weekly basis as a minimum.
The NeuroPathic Pain Score (NeuPPS) has been designed to specifically capture neuropathic pain in postsurgical patients and has been Rasch-validated [45]. Participants were asked to report symptoms for the last week, in terms of (i) pins and needles, tingling or stabbing sensations; (ii) electrical shock or jolt; (iii) heat or burning sensation; (iv) hypersensitivity to clothes or touch; and (v) cold-provoked pain. Each symptom gave one point, adding up to a NeuPPS score ranging from 0 to 5 [45].
Adverse events and side effects to the HBOT intervention were recorded after every treatment session throughout the course of the HBOT treatment and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups.
Data analyses
Participants’ characteristics were presented as means with standard deviations (SD) for demographic and clinical information. Change in outcomes over time was assessed by univariate mixed effects models for repeated measurements for each outcome, presented as mean values and SD for each measurement time point, and estimates for β with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. Sensitivity analyses (stratified box plots and adjusted models) assessed if the lymphoscintigraphy procedure with/without strength training and whether belonging to intervention or control in the LYCA study had affected the results. In post hoc analyses, we assessed if there was an effect modification for baseline ILMD (≤ 10, > 10%), BMI (≤ 30, > 30 kg/m2) and number of positive lymph nodes (≤ 1, > 1), by adding interaction terms in the models. With the small sample size and great biological variation between participants, we explored various Δ-measurements for physical outcomes such as absolute change, change in the affected arm relative to the non-affected arm and a change ratio between the affected and non-affected arm. All statistical analyses were discussed with a senior statistician and performed by GA in STATA, v. 14.2.
Results
Out of the 158 LYCA participants, 130 were evaluated for LE at 1-year follow-up, and 50 were eligible for this trial. Twenty participants accepted participation and one withdrew consent prior to treatment commencement, leaving 19 participants in the trial, all completing treatment and follow-up.
Participant demographics and clinical information can be seen in Table 1. Participants were middle-aged, with above-average BMI and 7 participants were obese. The mean weight change of the participants was 1.5 kg in the study period (standard deviation 3.5 (min. − 8.5 kg and max. 5.8 kg)). The majority of participants had lumpectomy and the mean number of lymph nodes removed in ALND was 19. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy including taxanes had been administered to 7 participants, and adjuvant chemotherapy to 10, whereas all participants received radiotherapy. Twelve participants had been allocated to the progressive resistance training arm in the LYCA trial. Most participants were physically active more than 30 min per day. One participant was a current smoker despite advice that HBOT works better for non-smokers.
Physical outcomes
We found no consistent significant differences in ILMD as measured by DXA, but a tendency towards an increase when looking at the arm as a whole and lower arm isolated at the end of HBOT treatment. Conversely, with regard to lymphatic drainage assessed by lymphoscintigraphy and limb volume by perometry, the tendency was non-significantly reduced volume and improved drainage (Tables 2 and 3). Sensitivity analyses showed no different patterns of effect in physical outcomes for intervention or control participants in the LYCA RCT, nor between obese versus non-obese participants, ≤ 1 versus > 1 positive lymph nodes removed, or baseline ILMD ≤ 10 versus > 10 (data not shown). We noted that physical measurements had a wide range both in the normal and the affected arms.
Patient-reported outcomes
The self-reported functional ability measured by Lymph-ICF improved significantly with time in the study (Table 4), with an 8% (CI − 14.84; − 0.87) lower total score at 6-month follow-up. The change in the total score was driven primarily by the physical function subscale with a 12-point (CI − 19; − 5) improvement found at 6-month follow-up. Further, for the mobility/movement subscale, a borderline significant 7-point (CI − 15; 0) reduction was found at 6-month follow-up.
Results of selected relevant subscales in the EORTC C30 and BR23 modules are presented in Table 5. For the fatigue subscale, we found a significant overall trend for improvement over time (p < 0.001), although the change from baseline to 6-month follow-up was non-significant (β = − 16, CI –33; 1). Patients experienced significantly less insomnia at 6-month follow-up with a 12-point improvement from baseline (CI − 29; − 2). For the breast symptoms subscale, there was a 9-point improvement from baseline to 6-month follow-up (CI − 17; − 2).
Results of analyses on pain, symptoms of swelling and fatigue are presented in Table 6. Participants experienced only mild pain in the study period (< 3 points on a 0–10-point scale). For intensity of worst pain in the previous 24 h, we found a statistically significant 1.3-point reduction (CI − 2.4; − 0.2) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. For neuropathic pain, we found a significant trend of reduced symptoms with time in the study (p < 0.001), although the estimates for each measurement time point were non-significant. Lymphedema symptoms (heaviness, swelling and tightness) were significantly reduced, and at 6-month follow-up there was a 2-point reduction (CI − 3; − 1). Patient-reported fatigue improved significantly at each measurement time point with the largest improvement seen at 6-month follow-up (− 24 points, CI − 33; − 15).
Results for the remaining subscales of the Lymph-ICF, EORTC C30 and BR23 as well as scales for depression and anxiety are shown in Online Resources 1, 2 and 3. We found that emotional functioning had improved significantly with an 11-point increase at 6-month follow-up (CI 3; 19). For the other subscales (global health; physical, role, cognitive and social functioning; nausea; pain; dyspnoea; constipation; diarrhoea; financial worry; body image; sexual function; worry about future perspective; systemic and arm symptoms), there was no significant change.
Adverse events
Complications were confined to single occasions of problems with equalizing pressure in the ears (n = 2). Whereas one resolved with nose drops and spontaneously recovered, the other was resolved with ear drum puncture by ear and nose specialist, which resulted in temporary reduced hearing. Myopia was reported by 1 person, which resolved spontaneously. One participant experienced breast cancer recurrence during the follow-up period, an incidence classified as unlikely related to HBOT.
Discussion
In this explorative one-arm clinical trial, 19 women with LE after breast cancer underwent a HBOT programme. Participants experienced improvements in self-reported QOL with regard to physical functioning, fatigue, insomnia and breast and arm symptoms both during treatment, and interestingly, the effects peaked at 6 months after end of HBOT treatment. None of the physical examinations of LE (arm mass, lymph drainage or arm volume) demonstrated consistent significant changes during the observation period.
Earlier studies have examined the effects of HBOT on breast cancer-related LE [17–21, 46] with mixed results. The studies were conducted on populations with a short follow-up time, and time from treatment ranged from 1 to 27 years and therefore included patients with often longstanding changes of LE. It has been argued that the lack of consistent results could be attributed to the pathophysiological changes of long standing LE and the limited possibility for fibrotic tissue to remodel [18]. In this study, we had the possibility to recruit patients at 1 year post diagnosis, and therefore their LE history was limited to maximum 1 year.
In our study, patient-reported outcomes were improved, whereas the physical examinations of LE were largely unchanged (Table 2). This is in line with previous reports for patients with long-term LE, where similar methods for physical evaluation of LE showed no difference between intervention and control [18] or were not performed [17, 21]. Interestingly, improvements in patient reported outcomes were found in two observational studies [17, 21]. The first study examined effect on long-standing LE (n = 32) and compared with 12 controls, and found that participating in 25 sessions of HBOT caused improvements in self-reported pain, oedema and erythema in the long-term follow-up [21]. In the other study (n = 57) participating in 47 sessions of HBOT was associated with significant improvements in pain, swelling, shoulder movement and breast symtpoms [17].
Further, a small pilot RCT (n = 10) found that participating in 10 sessions of HBOT plus Complete Decongestive Therapy was better than Complete Decongestive Therapy alone and caused benefits on self-reported physical function while no change was seen in physical measurements of LE [46]. In an RCT by Gothard et al. [18], no improvements in patient-reported QOL were found, bearing in mind that participants had long-standing chronic manifestations of LE.
There may be several reasons why we, despite patient-reported benefits, failed to see an improvement in physical measures of LE during or after the HBOT intervention. One feasible explanation is that we may not have captured the changes that were responsible for the patient-reported benefits. We measured factors related to lymphatic drainage, although the benefits may well be more strongly related to benefits from alleviating radiation-induced tissue injury. In our study, all women had undergone ALND, one of the strongest risk factors for LE [47] responsible for structural changes to the lymphatic pathways. Although it has been demonstrated that HBOT may cause neovascularization, re-organization and reduction of fibrous tissue and an increase in the number of lymphatic vessels in the sub-epithelial irradiated area [22, 23], this may not have had sufficient impact for benefits to be detected by lymphoscintigraphy, DXA and perometry, but it may be responsible for the conflicting pattern of increase in mass concurrent with improvement in symptoms and a tendency towards reduced volume and improved lymphatic drainage. Any tendency towards effect in our results may, however, be the consequence of type II error as we did not attempt a power calculation on expected effect in this explorative study.
LE has consistently been reported to negatively impact QOL [48, 49]. In breast cancer survivors in general, QOL seems to improve with time since diagnosis as a result of the natural course. However, in women with LE, the impact is more persistent, most likely because LE is a chronic and progressive condition in contrast to other sequelae after breast cancer treatments which tend to improve with time. LE severity together with younger age and anxiety has been found to be strongly associated with reduced QOL in the long term [50]. The development of treatment options that reduce the impact on QOL is therefore paramount for the growing population of breast cancer survivors at risk for LE. Due to the lack of a control group in the current explorative trial, we cannot conclude a causal HBOT effect relationship, nor can we exclude that the improvements seen might stem from the natural course of symptoms with time. However, since other studies have found that HBOT is associated to a QOL improvement for women with reduced QOL due to LE in addition to radiation-induced late toxicity, HBOT may be a relevant treatment option [17, 21, 22, 51, 52].
Limitations and strengths
The small sample in the study means that only the very strong signals of change become statistically significant, and with the measurement of a large number of outcomes, the risk of changes being found by chance is high.
LE is a rather unstable condition, potentially under influence from daily variations in several external and internal factors, such as physical activity, temperature, hormonal cycle, diet and use of compression garments. We instructed participants not to wear compression garments on the day of measurements prior to the HBOT session, but we did not implement strict control during or after HBOT sessions, which may have caused an undisclosed impact on our results. Further, the participants’ weight changed somewhat during the study period, which may have influenced our measurements and caused a discrepancy between single arm volume measurements (perometry) and interlimb volume difference measurements (DXA).
Although the group of patients are relatively homogenous in terms of treatment received and time since diagnosis, we were restricted by the RCT follow-up before we could invite participants into the HBOT trial. Thereby, the duration of symptoms before enrolment varied with up to 1 year. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the most homogenous population studied in HBOT trials so far.
We had a recruitment rate of 19/50 which may be considered low. A barrier to recruitment was that only one treatment centre was available, and many patients had to travel far to participate in the extensive 8-week treatment programme. Further, many patients were reluctant to commit to an extensive treatment regime with unknown benefit, as it would interfere with getting back to normal life and picking up full-time work. Nevertheless, once enrolled, participants experienced few side effects of HBOT, and we were able to carry out a complete 6-month follow-up for all participants. Lastly, a study strength is that we used only validated scales for assessing the impact of HBOT on QOL.
Conclusion
In this explorative clinical trial of HBOT in patients with LE, we demonstrate improvements in self-reported QOL in several LE-related domains, which peaked at 6 months’ follow-up. The improvements could not, however, be detected in physically measured arm volume or lymphatic drainage. In women with severe symptoms of LE in addition to radiation- and chemotherapy-induced late treatment toxicity, HBOT may be a valuable treatment option. However, further research uncovering the underlying mechanisms and discriminating if certain subgroups may benefit is called upon. A large-scale, preferably blinded, multi-centre randomized controlled trial measuring overall HBOT impact on QOL in patients with severe symptoms present 12–24 months after primary breast cancer treatment seems justified.
Data availability
Data may be available by contacting the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Correa C, Harris EE, Leonardi MC, Smith BD, Taghian AG, Thompson AM et al (2017) Accelerated partial breast irradiation: executive summary for the update of an ASTRO Evidence-Based Consensus Statement. Pract Radiat Oncol 7(2):73–79
Bartelink H, Maingon P, Poortmans P, Weltens C, Fourquet A, Jager J et al (2015) Whole-breast irradiation with or without a boost for patients treated with breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16(1):47–56
Gärtner R, Jensen MB, Kronborg L, Ewertz M, Kehlet H, Kroman N (2010) Self-reported arm-lymphedema and functional impairment after breast cancer treatment–a nationwide study of prevalence and associated factors. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 19(6):506–515
Mokhatri-Hesari P, Montazeri A (2020) Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: review of reviews from 2008 to 2018. Health Qual Life Outcomes 18(1):338
Taghian NR, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, O’Toole J, Skolny MN (2014) Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 92(3):227–234
Vassard D, Olsen MH, Zinckernagel L, Vibe-Petersen J, Dalton SO, Johansen C (2010) Psychological consequences of lymphoedema associated with breast cancer a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 46(18):3211–8
Dayan JH, Ly CL, Kataru RP, Mehrara BJ (2018) Lymphedema: Pathogenesis and Novel Therapies. Annu Rev Med 69:263–276
Rockson SG, Keeley V, Kilbreath S, Szuba A, Towers A (2019) Cancer-associated secondary lymphoedema. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5(1):22
Davies C, Levenhagen K, Ryans K, Perdomo M, Gilchrist L (2020) Interventions for breast cancer-related lymphedema: clinical practice guideline from the Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy of APTA. Phys Ther 100(7):1163–1179
Vilholm OJ, Cold S, Rasmussen L, Sindrup SH (2008) The postmastectomy pain syndrome: an epidemiological study on the prevalence of chronic pain after surgery for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 99(4):604–610
Kootstra J, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Rietman H, de Vries J, Baas P, Geertzen JH et al (2008) Quality of life after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in stage I/II breast cancer patients: a prospective longitudinal study. Ann Surg Oncol 15(9):2533–2541
Padera TP, Meijer EF, Munn LL (2016) The lymphatic system in disease processes and cancer progression. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 18:125–158
Oscarsson N, Müller B, Rosén A, Lodding P, Mölne J, Giglio D et al (2019) Radiation-induced cystitis treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (RICH-ART): a randomised, controlled, phase 2–3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(11):1602–1614
Oliai C, Fisher B, Jani A, Wong M, Poli J, Brady LW et al (2012) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radiation-induced cystitis and proctitis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84(3):733–740
Kirby JP (2019) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and radiation-induced injuries. Mo Med 116(3):198–200
Borab Z, Mirmanesh MD, Gantz M, Cusano A, Pu LL (2017) Systematic review of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of radiation-induced skin necrosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70(4):529–538
Teguh DN, BolRaap R, Struikmans H, Verhoef C, Koppert LB, Koole A et al (2016) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation-induced tissue toxicity: prospectively patient-reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Rad Oncol (London, England) 11(1):130
Gothard L, Haviland J, Bryson P, Laden G, Glover M, Harrison S et al (2010) Randomised phase II trial of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with chronic arm lymphoedema after radiotherapy for cancer. Radiother Oncol 97(1):101–107
Gothard L, Stanton A, MacLaren J, Lawrence D, Hall E, Mortimer P et al (2004) Non-randomised phase II trial of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with chronic arm lymphoedema and tissue fibrosis after radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 70(3):217–224
Teas J, Cunningham JE, Cone L, Jansen K, Raghavan SK, Nitcheva DK et al (2004) Can hyperbaric oxygen therapy reduce breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema? A pilot study. J Women’s Health (2022) 13(9):1008–18
Carl UM, Feldmeier JJ, Schmitt G, Hartmann KA (2001) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late sequelae in women receiving radiation after breast-conserving surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49(4):1029–1031
Bennett MH, Feldmeier J, Hampson NB, Smee R, Milross C (2016) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation tissue injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):Cd005005
Svalestad J, Hellem S, Thorsen E, Johannessen AC (2015) Effect of hyperbaric oxygen treatment on irradiated oral mucosa: microvessel density. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(3):301–307
Batenburg MCT, Maarse W, van der Leij F, Baas IO, Boonstra O, Lansdorp N et al (2021) The impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on late radiation toxicity and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 189(2):425–433
Schiavo S, DeBacker J, Djaiani C, Bhatia A, Englesakis M, Katznelson R (2021) Mechanistic rationale and clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in chronic neuropathic pain: an evidence-based narrative review. Pain Res Manage 2021:8817504
Ammitzbøll G, Johansen C, Lanng C, Andersen EW, Kroman N, Zerahn B et al (2019) Progressive resistance training to prevent arm lymphedema in the first year after breast cancer surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 125(10):1683–1692
Ammitzbøll G, Lanng C, Kroman N, Zerahn B, Hyldegaard O, Kaae Andersen K et al (2017) Progressive strength training to prevent LYmphoedema in the first year after breast CAncer - the LYCA feasibility study. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 56(2):360–366
Megens AM, Harris SR, Kim-Sing C, McKenzie DC (2001) Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82:1639–1644
Stout Gergich NL, Pfalzer LA, McGarvey C, Springer B, Gerber LH, Soballe P (2008) Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema. Cancer 112:2809–2819
Stanton AW, Modi S, Britton TM et al (2009) Lymphatic drainage in the muscle and subcutis of the arm after breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 117:549–557
Thomis S, Dams L, Fourneau I, De Vrieze T, Nevelsteen I, Neven P, Gebruers N, Devoogdt N (2020) Correlation between clinical assessment and lymphofluoroscopy in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a study of concurrent validity. Lymphat Res Biol 18:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2019.0090
GCP-Enheden. GCP-Enheden Bispebjerg Hospital 2021 [Available from: https://www.bispebjerghospital.dk/forskning/om-forskning/Sider/GCP-Enheden.aspx.
Newman AL, Rosenthall L, Towers A, Hodgson P, Shay CA, Tidhar D et al (2013) Determining the precision of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance spectroscopy in the assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol 11(2):104–109
Gjorup C, Zerahn B, Hendel HW (2010) Assessment of volume measurement of breast cancer-related lymphedema by three methods: circumference measurement, water displacement, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Lymphat Res Biol 8(2):111–119
Gjorup CA, Hendel HW, Klausen TW, Zerahn B, Hölmich LR (2018) Reference Values for Assessment of Unilateral Limb Lymphedema with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Lymphat Res Biol 16(1):75–84
Sun F, Hall A, Tighe MP, Brunelle CL, Sayegh HE, Gillespie TC et al (2018) Perometry versus simulated circumferential tape measurement for the detection of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat 172(1):83–91
Devoogdt N, Van Kampen M, Geraerts I, Coremans T, Christiaens M-R (2011) Questionnaire (Lymph-ICF): reliability and validity, lymphoedema functioning, disability and health. Phys Ther 91:944–957
Sprangers MA, Cull A, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Aaronson NK (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Approach to quality of life assessment: guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Qual Life Res 2(4):287–95
Sprangers MA, Cull A, Groenvold M, Bjordal K, Blazeby J, Aaronson NK (1998) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Qual Life Res 7(4):291–300
Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P (2004) The SCL-90 and SCL-90R versions validated by item response models in a Danish community sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 110(3):225–229
Ellervik C, Kvetny J, Christensen KS, Vestergaard M, Bech P (2014) Prevalence of depression, quality of life and antidepressant treatment in the Danish General Suburban Population Study. Nord J Psychiatry 68(7):507–512
Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Olsen LR, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W (2001) The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord 66(2–3):159–164
Santana MJ, Au HJ, Dharma-Wardene M, Hewitt JD, Dupere D, Hanson J et al (2009) Health-related quality of life measures in routine clinical care: can FACT-fatigue help to assess the management of fatigue in cancer patients? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25(1):90–96
Gartner R, Jensen MB, Kronborg L, Ewertz M, Kehlet H, Kroman N (2010) Self-reported arm-lymphedema and functional impairment after breast cancer treatment–a nationwide study of prevalence and associated factors. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 19(6):506–515
Mejdahl MK, Christoffersens KB, Andersen KG (2019) Development and validation of a screening tool for surgery-specific neuropathic pain: Neuropathic Pain Scale for postsurgical patients. Pain Physician 22(2):E81-e90
Koo JH, Song SH, Oh HS, Oh SH (2020) Comparison of the short-term effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and complex decongestive therapy on breast cancer-related lymphedema: A pilot study. Medicine 99(11):e19564
Hayes SC, Janda M, Cornish B, Battistutta D, Newman B (2008) Lymphedema after breast cancer: incidence, risk factors, and effect on upper body function. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3536–3542
Morgan PA, Franks PJ, Moffatt CJ (2005) Health-related quality of life with lymphoedema: a review of the literature. Int Wound J 2(1):47–62
Klernäs P, Johnsson A, Horstmann V, Johansson K (2018) Health-related quality of life in patients with lymphoedema - a cross-sectional study. Scand J Caring Sci 32(2):634–644
Zhang L, Zhang H, Zhong Q, Luo Q, Gong N, Zhang Y, et al. (2021) Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Effect of Age, Lymphedema Severity, and Anxiety. Lymphatic Res Biol
Batenburg MCT, Maarse W, van der Leij F, Baas IO, Boonstra O, Lansdorp N et al (2021) The impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on late radiation toxicity and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 189(2):425–433
Meier EL, Hummelink S, Lansdorp N, Boonstra O, Ulrich DJ (2021) Perioperative hyperbaric oxygen treatment and postoperative complications following secondary breast reconstruction after radiotherapy: a case-control study of 45 patients. Diving Hyperb Med 51(3):288–294
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the valuable input from senior statistician Elisabeth Wreford Andersen at the Danish Cancer Society Research Center in discussions about methodology in analyses of data.
Funding
The study was funded by Knæk Cancer (2014) through a grant obtained by Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton and by TrygFonden through a grant obtained by Gunn Ammitzbøll. OH’s research position was also funded by the Ellabfonden in Denmark. The funding sources have had no role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and writing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GA: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, investigation, project administration, validation, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing.
CJ: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, resources, supervision and writing—review and editing.
CL: methodology, resources, supervision and writing—review and editing.
NK: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, resources and writing—review and editing.
BZ: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, investigation, resources and writing—review and editing.
LTJ: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources and writing—review and editing.
OH: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology and writing—review and editing.
SOD: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, resources, supervision and writing—review and editing.
MF: data curation, investigation, project administration, validation and writing—review and editing.
HR: investigation, project administration, validation, writing—review and editing.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave written informed consent before any initiation of study activities. The trial was approved by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority as a trial including medicinal gas (EUDRACT no. 2015–000604-25), and the Ethical committee of the Capitol Region (No. R96-A6604-14-S22).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ammitzbøll, G., Hyldegaard, O., Forchhammer, M. et al. Effects of an early intervention with Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment on arm lymphedema and quality of life after breast cancer—an explorative clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 31, 313 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07774-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07774-8