Abstract
Background
Cancer patients usually take many medications. The proportion of patients with advanced cancer who are taking futile drugs is unknown.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all consecutive ambulatory patients with advanced cancer and who were receiving supportive care exclusively at palliative care clinics, Princess Margaret Hospital, to gather information on futile medications used by them. Futile medications were defined as unnecessary (when no short-term benefit to patients with respect to survival, quality of life, or symptom control was anticipated) or duplicate (two or more drugs from the same pharmacological class). Summary statistics were used to describe the results.
Results
From November 2005 to July 2006, 82 (22%) of 372 patients were taking at least one futile medication before consultation; after initial consultation, this proportion dropped to 20% (78): 70 patients were taking unnecessary medications, while eight were on duplicate medications. The most frequent unnecessary medications used by patients were statins (56%). The most common duplicate medication involved the use of two different benzodiazepines (seven patients).
Conclusion
About one fifth of cancer outpatients at the end of life take futile medications, most commonly statins. Prospective and population-based studies are warranted to further evaluate the magnitude and consequences of futile medication use in oncology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Medical futility has been defined as “an intervention that no longer provides patient benefit, does not achieve a valuable goal, has a potential for harm and lacks benefits to justify resources” [1], but this definition remains conditional on treatment aims, patient and family desires, and ethical issues [2, 3]. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation are examples of futile interventions that have been reported in terminally ill general medicine patients [4–6]. Studies of terminally ill patients with cancer have shown that end-of-life decision-making is ethically challenging [3, 7, 8], with patients commonly exposed to futile interventions [9–11]. A study of acutely ill cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit found that 26 out of 106 consecutive patients were taking futile or inappropriate drugs, most commonly cardiovascular agents [12]. However, the proportion of ambulatory patients with advanced cancer (which comprise the majority of cancer patients) who take unnecessary medications is unknown and is the focus of this report.
Materials and methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of medication profiles [13] and potential drug interactions [14] among 372 consecutive adult patients with advanced/incurable solid or hematological malignancies attending palliative clinics at the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) in Toronto between November 2005 and July 2006. Patients still receiving cancer-directed therapy were excluded. Data on patient demographics, cancer type, comorbidities, and medications were gathered from the chart, specifically from the first palliative care consultation. At PMH, patients are referred by medical and radiation oncologists to palliative care clinics for symptom management and/or for end-of-life planning [15]; the median survival of patients seen by our palliative care service is approximately 2 months (including those patients still receiving cancer-directed treatment; range 2 days to 3.5 years) [16]. Following the first consultation, the palliative care physician dictates a comprehensive medical history [13], including information on medications which is systematically collected by a specialized nurse.
For the purpose of this study, the medication profile of each patient was reviewed to determine whether any of the drugs being taken was futile. To classify a drug as futile, we considered the usefulness of each drug to treat a comorbid illness or a self-reported symptom and defined a futile medication as unnecessary or duplicate. An unnecessary medication was an agent that did not result in significant patient benefit in terms of symptom control or survival; had no scientific evidence for the purpose of its use (e.g., unproven alternative compounds); or had a goal of therapy that was expected to take place only with long-term chronic use (e.g., statins to treat hypercholesterolemia). We also took into account that the discontinuation of drugs classified as futile was not expected to cause adverse outcomes in the short-term (6 months). Drugs prescribed by physicians as well as those self-used by patients (over-the-counter drugs) were considered for this study; we did not gather information on herbal compounds or complementary therapies.
Antihypertensive and hypoglycemic agents were not considered unnecessary if they were continued by the palliative care physician, since we were not able to reliably determine retrospectively blood pressure and serum glucose level. We also did not consider medications added by the palliative care physicians to be futile because they were exclusively prescribed to treat cancer-related symptoms. Duplicate medication use was considered to be present when two or more drugs from the same pharmacological class were being taken by a patient. The evaluation of appropriateness of drug dosage, frequency, schedule, and duration of therapy were beyond the scope of this study. Summary statistics were used to describe the results.
Results
Characteristics of the cohort have been described previously [13]: the median age was 66 years (range 22–94 years), 49% were female, and gastrointestinal tumors were most common. The most common pharmacological classes of medication used by patients were opioids (67% of patients), laxatives/stool softeners (54%), acetaminophen (40%), and corticosteroids (38%). More than half of the patients were taking at least six medications each (range 0–21). Cardiovascular diseases (36% of patients), diabetes (14%), musculoskeletal disorders (11%), respiratory diseases, and thromboembolism (10% each) were the most frequent comorbidities.
Among the 372 patients, 82 (22%) were using at least one futile medication; of these, 90% were unnecessary medications and 10% involved duplicate medications (Table 1). Among the futile medications (N = 85), most involved the use of statins (56%) and multivitamins (30%). Four patients (5%) with hematological malignancy and no history of hyperuricemia, gout, or current leukocytosis were taking allopurinol; folic acid was used by two patients and ferrous gluconate by three patients without history of folic acid or iron deficiency anemia, respectively; and fenofibrate in one patient with hypercholesterolemia. Multivitamins, folate, and iron likely reflect over-the-counter use. Eight patients were exposed to duplicate medications: seven patients were taking two different benzodiazepines and one patient was taking two different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. After being assessed by the palliative care team, 78 (20%) of patients continued on at least one futile drug; statins were discontinued in four patients. None of the duplicate medications were discontinued.
Discussion
This retrospective analysis suggests that about one fifth of cancer outpatients at the end of life take futile medications, most commonly statins. Previous studies have shown that many cancer patients continue to receive aggressive interventions, including chemotherapy, sometimes days before their death [9, 10]. While physicians may consider many therapeutic interventions futile, it is not unusual for caregivers to request that “everything be done” [7]. A prospective study of severely ill cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit showed that approximately one quarter were taking unnecessary or inappropriate drugs [12]. However, the authors did not specify which drugs were considered futile (unnecessary) or inappropriate (a drug used with a wrong purpose or schedule, or expected to cause adverse outcomes). Also, the population was composed of dying cancer inpatients, as opposed to ambulatory patients with advanced cancer and limited life expectancy who were the focus of our report.
Patients with terminal cancer often take numerous medications to treat comorbid illnesses and cancer-related symptoms [13]. A recent study showed that the number of medications prescribed to cancer patients increases as death approaches with the number of drugs to treat comorbid conditions decreasing and the number of supportive care agents increasing [17]. This is particularly important in view of the potential clinical consequences of polypharmacy, which has been associated with increased risk of adverse drug events [18], including drug interactions [14, 19]. We found that statins were commonly used by terminally ill cancer patients. However, it is unlikely that a decrease in serum cholesterol levels would impact on the survival of cancer patients with a limited life expectancy. Moreover, although statins usually have a good safety profile, they may interact with other drugs, are expensive, and can result in rare but serious side effects such as hepatitis and rhabdomyolysis [20]. A systematic review on the use of lipid-lowering drugs by noncancer patients at the end of life discussed the burden of long-term use of statins to patients and the complexities of discontinuing medications that do not necessarily impact on patient quality of life or survival [21]. Although multivitamins usually do not cause adverse clinical consequences, they may interact with other drugs [22] and can be costly; these likely reflect patient self-prescription.
It is not clear why one fifth of our patients were taking futile drugs nor why there was so little change in the use of futile and duplicate medications before and after the initial palliative care consultation. Studies have shown that physicians overestimate the survival of cancer patients by up to 40% [23]; therefore, it is possible that they continue to prescribe futile medications because of overestimation of prognosis. Also, physicians may hesitate to compromise patient hope by discontinuing a drug for which clinical benefits are expected only with long-term use. This may be the case for the continuation of these drugs by palliative care physicians after the initial consultation, as they might fear compromising the newly developing patient–physician relationship. Other potential reasons include lack of medication reconciliation, patient requests, lack of medical knowledge, the reasonably good safety profile of drugs such as statins [21], physician and patient belief in the potential benefits and lack of harm of the futile drugs, and recommendations from other medical specialists. With respect to multivitamins, doctors may feel that such compounds would neither help nor harm their patients; patients, in contrast, often have faith in the benefits of alternative medicines [24, 25]. These issues underline the need for improvement in communication both between physicians and patients [26] and among health care professionals.
This report was limited in that it was a single-institution study with retrospective data collection. Given that we did not assess patients prospectively, and thus could not evaluate the need for each drug based on patient clinical condition, we may have misclassified unnecessary medications as not futile, thereby underestimating the proportion of patients taking futile medications. Over-the-counter medications may not have been mentioned by the patient at the initial palliative care consultation, and our estimate of such medications, including multivitamins, may, therefore, be particularly underestimated. Also, we could not estimate the severity of patients’ comorbidity in order to evaluate the true need for pharmacological therapy, nor could we evaluate why physicians in this sample chose to continue or discontinue a given drug. Lastly, it was not possible to evaluate whether patients taking futile medications experienced adverse clinical outcomes. The inappropriate continuation of antihypertensives or hypoglycemic agents is particularly important in this regard and needs to be assessed in future prospective studies.
The use of medications which are futile in patients with terminal cancer can lead to adverse drug events, which may compromise treatment efficacy and patient quality of life, or be misinterpreted as cancer progression. In addition, it is wasteful of resources for patients and/or third party payers. Continuous reassessment of patients’ medication lists is a logical first step to prevent the continued use of medications that have become futile due to the patient’s advanced illness. Improved communication among health professionals and between patients and their physicians could increase understanding of why patients are taking a given drug, how long it has been taken, who prescribed it, and for which purpose.
In summary, the present retrospective report showed that about one fifth of cancer patients at the end of life use medications that lack benefit in the short-term. Prospective studies in the community setting and population-based analyses are warranted to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of futile medication use in oncology practice.
References
Jecker NS, Pearlman RA (1992) Medical futility. Who decides? Arch Intern Med 152:1140–1144 doi:10.1001/archinte.152.6.1140
Kite S, Wilkinson S (2002) Beyond futility: to what extent is the concept of futility useful in clinical decision-making about CPR? Lancet Oncol 3:638–642 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00878-1
Kasman DL (2004) When is medical treatment futile? A guide for students, residents, and physicians. J Gen Intern Med 19:1053–1056 doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40134.x
Frick S, Uehlinger DE, Zuercher Zenklusen RM (2003) Medical futility: predicting outcome of intensive care unit patients by nurses and doctors—a prospective comparative study. Crit Care Med 31:456–461 doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000049945.69373.7C
Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Caldwell ES, Collier AC (2000) The attitudes of patients with advanced AIDS toward use of the medical futility rationale in decisions to forego mechanical ventilation. Arch Intern Med 160:1597–1601 doi:10.1001/archinte.160.11.1597
Clark PA (2002) Medical futility in pediatrics: is it time for a public policy? J Public Health Policy 23:66–89 doi:10.2307/3343119
Cantor MD, Braddock CH 3rd, Derse AR et al (2003) Do-not-resuscitate orders and medical futility. Arch Intern Med 163:2689–2694 doi:10.1001/archinte.163.22.2689
Burt RA (2002) The medical futility debate: patient choice, physician obligation, and end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 5:249–254 doi:10.1089/109662102753641223
Escalante CP, Martin CG, Elting LS, Rubenstein EB (1997) Medical futility and appropriate medical care in patients whose death is thought to be imminent. Support Care Cancer 5:274–280 doi:10.1007/s005200050074
von Gruenigen VE, Daly BJ (2005) Futility: clinical decisions at the end-of-life in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 97:638–644 doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.031
Honegger HP (1991) Avoiding futility: assessment of cancer patients in intensive care units. Ann Oncol 2:530–531
Nicholson A, Andrew I, Etherington R, et al (2001) Futile and inappropriate prescribing: an assessment of the issue in a series of patients admitted to a palliative care unit. Available at http://www.pharmj.com/IJPP/bpc2001/ijpp_bpc2001_r72.pdf
Riechelmann RP, Krzyzanowska MK, O'Carroll A, Zimmermann C (2007) Symptom and medication profiles among cancer patients attending a palliative care clinic. Support Care Cancer 15:1407–1412 doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0253-8
Riechelmann RP, Zimmermann C, Chin S et al (2008) Potential drug interactions in cancer patients receiving palliative care exclusively. J Pain Symptom Manage 08(35):535–543 doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.06.009
Zimmermann C, Seccareccia D, Clarke A et al (2006) Bringing palliative care to a Canadian cancer center: the palliative care program at Princess Margaret Hospital. Support Care Cancer 14:982–987 doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0093-y
Zimmermann C, Walsh A, Gagliese L et al (2007) Determinants of referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care. Psychooncology 16:S57
Currow DC, Stevenson JP, Abernethy AP et al (2007) Prescribing in palliative care as death approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:590–595 doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01124.x
Corcoran ME (1997) Polypharmacy in the older patient with cancer. Cancer Control 4:419–428
Riechelmann RP, Tannock IF, Wang L et al (2007) Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:592–600 doi:10.1093/jnci/djk130
Bottorff MB (2006) Statin safety and drug interactions: clinical implications. Am J Cardiol 97:27C–31C doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.007
Vollrath AM, Sinclair C, Hallenbeck J (2005) Discontinuing cardiovascular medications at the end of life: lipid-lowering agents. J Palliat Med 8:876–881 doi:10.1089/jpm.2005.8.876
Basu TK (1985) Drug–vitamin interaction. Int J Vitam Nutr Res Suppl 27:247–258
Glare P, Virik K, Jones M et al (2003) A systematic review of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ 327:195–198 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7408.195
Samano ES, Goldenstein PT, Ribeiro Lde M et al (2004) Praying correlates with higher quality of life: results from a survey on complementary/alternative medicine use among a group of Brazilian cancer patients. Sao Paulo Med J 122:60–63 doi:10.1590/S1516-31802004000200005
Samano ES, Ribeiro LM, Campos AS et al (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine by Brazilian oncologists. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 14:143–148 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00524.x
Back A (2006) Patient–physician communication in oncology: what does the evidence show? Oncology (Williston Park) 20:67–74 (discussion 77–78, 83)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors have no financial conflicts to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riechelmann, R.P., Krzyzanowska, M.K. & Zimmermann, C. Futile medication use in terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 17, 745–748 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0541-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0541-y