Abstract
Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by increased rates of kidney involvement, termed lupus nephritis. Despite the significant morbidity and mortality associated with this disease, lupus nephritis trials have been plagued by repeated failures to meet clinical endpoints. However, improvements in trial design and the development of targeted approaches have begun to yield promising results, including two new FDA-approved lupus nephritis treatments since 2020. These include belimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the B cell survival cytokine BAFF (B cell activating factor), and voclosporin, a cyclosporin analog with improved pharmacokinetic characteristics. In this review, we will summarize the data supporting regulatory approval for these agents in lupus nephritis and highlight ongoing clinical trials targeting the diverse immunologic drivers of renal inflammation in SLE. While pediatric patients remain underrepresented in lupus clinical trials, given the increased severity of childhood-onset SLE and need for long-term protection from kidney damage, we anticipate the need for off-label use of these targeted therapies in the pediatric population. Future studies are needed to define optimal patient selection, drug combinations, and treatment duration in pediatric lupus nephritis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can affect virtually every organ system in the body. Although most frequently developing in adulthood, childhood-onset SLE accounts for 10–20% of all lupus cases [1]. Pediatric lupus is frequently more severe than adult disease, highlighting the need for effective therapies to control autoimmune inflammation in the pediatric population. Of the many clinical manifestations of SLE, the development of lupus nephritis is associated with a worse prognosis, including the risk of long-term kidney damage and progression to kidney failure. Unfortunately, approximately 35–40% of children with SLE develop lupus nephritis, most often within the first 2 years after diagnosis [2,3,4,5]. Compared with adult patients, data describing the long-term prognosis of childhood-onset lupus nephritis is sparse. In the era prior to use of cytotoxic immunosuppression, clinical outcomes in lupus nephritis were poor. However, more recent data report 92% and 86% five- and 10-year kidney survival in pediatric lupus nephritis [6]. Despite these improved renal outcomes, children with SLE and lupus nephritis endure significantly higher morbidity and mortality compared to healthy children. For these reasons, the development of safe and effective treatments for lupus nephritis able to both treat renal inflammation and prevent the accrual of kidney damage is of critical importance.
In this review, we aim first to review the current standard-of-care for initial therapy of pediatric proliferative lupus nephritis. Next, we will summarize the clinical trial data that supported regulatory approval of two new agents for the treatment of adult lupus nephritis: belimumab and voclosporin. Finally, we will highlight new targeted approaches for lupus nephritis, including reported data from an early-stage clinical trial of obinutuzumab in lupus nephritis and new studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Unfortunately, enrollment eligibility for lupus nephritis clinical trials is generally limited to patients greater than 18 years of age. Thus, the generalizability of published data to pediatric patients remains uncertain. However, given the potential for worse renal outcomes for childhood-onset lupus nephritis, developing clinical experience with these novel therapies is an important goal for the pediatric nephrology community.
Lupus nephritis pathogenesis and classification
A detailed overview of the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis is beyond the scope of this manuscript. However, we refer the reader to several reviews on the immunologic mechanisms driving renal inflammation in SLE [7, 8]. To assist with interpretation of clinical trial data, we will briefly review the histopathological classification of lupus nephritis. The initial classification system published by the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) in 2003 was most recently updated in 2018 and divides lupus nephritis into six classes (Table 1) [9, 10]. Most studies cited in this review, including those that supported the approval of belimumab and voclosporin, used the original 2003 classification in their inclusion criteria. Class III and IV lupus nephritis are predominant in children with lupus nephritis, accounting for up to 75% of cases of kidney involvement, with 29% classifying as class III and 49% as class IV disease in one study [11]. Because of worse renal outcomes in patients with proliferative disease [12], the majority of clinical trials in lupus nephritis focus on patients with Class III and Class IV disease, with variable inclusion of Class V (membranous) lupus nephritis. For example, the obinutuzumab trials enrolled Class III/IV nephritis with or without concurrent Class V disease, while the belimumab and voclosporin (AURA-LV and AURORA 1) trials also allowed isolated Class V disease. Included in the 2018 ISN/RPS revision of the classification system was the addition of the activity and chronicity indices based on the National Institute of Health index, aimed at better prognosticating progression of kidney disease. It is important to note that available recommendations based on evidence are intended to guide treatment for patients with high activity index and low chronicity scores, who should not be managed with the same targeted immunotherapies as patients with low activity index and high chronicity scores.
Initial therapy for lupus nephritis: the current standard-of-care
The treatment of Class III/IV proliferative lupus nephritis has historically been conceptually divided into induction and maintenance phases. While this distinction between treatment phases is somewhat arbitrary, the goal of induction therapy is to achieve remission by controlling inflammation and minimizing parenchymal injury, while the aim of maintenance therapy is to sustain remission and prevent progression of chronic kidney disease. Over the last four decades, significant advances have been made in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis, leading to improvements in overall prognosis. A major advance in lupus nephritis therapy was the landmark 1986 trial conducted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) which showed that cytotoxic chemotherapies, in particular cyclophosphamide, were superior to high-dose prednisone alone in preventing kidney failure in patients with active lupus nephritis [13]. While these findings enhanced clinical outcomes for lupus nephritis patients, the numerous immediate and cumulative adverse effects of cyclophosphamide prompted efforts to discover treatments with improved safety profiles.
In 2000, a trial performed in Hong Kong by Chan et al. demonstrated that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) resulted in comparable induction of remission compared with IV cyclophosphamide [14]. Despite similar clinical outcomes, MMF treatment was more tolerable, with side-effects such as hair loss and amenorrhea being limited to the cyclophosphamide arm. An important caveat to this study was that few enrolled patients exhibited markers of poor prognosis in lupus nephritis, such as elevated creatinine at time of biopsy, presence of glomerular and tubulointerstitial scarring, and male sex [15]. For this reason, a larger multinational randomized controlled trial, the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) group trial, was performed [16]. Using an outcome focused on reduction in urine protein/creatinine ratio and improvement in serum creatinine, the investigators found no significant difference between cyclophosphamide and MMF treatment arms. In addition, no differences were observed in rates of adverse events or infections between treatment groups. An advantage of the ALMS trial was the inclusion of a large and racially diverse population, providing important granular data on differences in response across racial and ethnic groups. The investigators reported that within the subset of black and Hispanic patients, more patients responded to MMF compared to IV cyclophosphamide [16], raising important questions regarding the impact of social determinants of health and structural inequalities on these results. Importantly, while the study did not meet its primary endpoint of showing superior efficacy of MMF compared with IV cyclophosphamide, MMF was found to be consistently effective across all racial/ethnic groups, indicating that this therapy is a viable option for initial therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis.
A final strategy for initial treatment of lupus nephritis that limits adverse effects of cytotoxic agents, is a low-dose cyclophosphamide regimen. The Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of low- and high-dose IV cyclophosphamide [17]. In the standard high-dose group, patients received 6 monthly IV cyclophosphamide doses (500 mg/m2 titrated up to 1500 mg/dose) followed by 2 quarterly doses. In the low-dose group, patients were given 6 fixed-dose 500 mg IV cyclophosphamide infusions every 2 weeks before being transitioned to oral azathioprine. Both regimens achieved similar rates of renal remission after initial therapy, with similar rates of relapses but lower rates of adverse infections in the low-dose group. While the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial primarily enrolled subjects with European ancestry, its initial findings were supported by the subsequent Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study (ACCESS), in which the Euro-Lupus regimen was used as baseline immunosuppression resulting in similar outcomes to historical data in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort [18].
Founded on these data, the current standard of care for initial therapy in proliferative lupus nephritis specifies the use of either cyclophosphamide or MMF in conjunction with corticosteroids. Organizations such as European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) and Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) have published recommendations on initial therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis [19, 20]. As noted above, evidence from randomized clinical trials in children with proliferative lupus nephritis is lacking. For this reason, the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) used a structured consensus formation process to develop a consensus treatment plan (CTP) for the treatment of childhood-onset lupus nephritis [21]. This approach was adapted from experience in other pediatric diseases, in which clinical trial data is either lacking or challenging to generate because of limited patient population size. Table 2 summarizes the CARRA CTP for initial therapy of newly diagnosed pediatric proliferative lupus nephritis, which recommends the use of either IV cyclophosphamide every 4 weeks for 6 months or oral MMF twice per day for 6 months, with three separate standardized corticosteroid taper plans. In Europe, the Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) initiative generated a similar set of evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of childhood lupus nephritis, which outlines a standardized regimen of MMF (1200 mg/m2/day up to 1800 mg/m2/day for poor response) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (high or low dose per Euro-Lupus Trial) in addition to prednisone (1–2 mg/kg/day, maximum 60 mg/day), as summarized in Table 2 [22]. The ultimate goal of both the CARRA CTP and SHARE recommendations was to reduce clinical practice variability in order to allow future comparison of clinical outcomes across standardized treatment approaches.
Newly approved treatments for lupus nephritis
Despite improved renal outcomes in proliferative lupus nephritis following standardization of cyclophosphamide and MMF treatment regimens, up to 45% of these patients do not achieve remission within the first 6 months of standard therapy [16]. In addition, protocol kidney biopsies have shown continued histologic activity in a significant portion of patients achieving apparent complete clinical remission [23]. These data emphasize the need to develop additional targeted therapies. In recent years, lupus nephritis clinical trials have showed limited success, including large randomized control trials demonstrating no benefit for drugs targeting diverse immune mechanisms, such as co-stimulatory blockade (CTLA4-Ig, abatacept) [18, 24,25,26], B cell depletion (anti-CD20, rituximab [27, 28] and ocrelizumab [29]), and cytokine blockade (anti-IL-6, sirukumab) [30]. Fortunately, researchers and pharmaceutical companies have continued to pursue alternate approaches to treat this challenging disease. This persistence led to two new FDA-approved therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis since 2020: belimumab and voclosporin. We have included a summary of relevant clinical trials of newly approved and emerging drugs, along with their primary and secondary endpoints and their definitions in Table 3. All included clinical trials use complete renal remission (CRR) as one of their endpoints, as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and reduction in proteinuria. While there is variability in the definition of CRR among the trials, remission as defined by normalization in serum creatinine and resolution of proteinuria after immunosuppressive therapy has been shown in previous studies to be a valid predictor for important long-term outcomes such as renal survival and death in the adult lupus nephritis population [31]. In children with Class III and IV lupus nephritis, failure to achieve remission at 6 and 12 months after initiation of therapy has been associated with long-term poor renal prognosis (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or persistent dialysis) [32].
Belimumab
Belimumab (Benlysta) is a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the activity of the B cell survival cytokine BAFF (B cell activating factor), also known as BlyS (B-lymphocyte stimulator) [33, 34]. The rationale for targeting this molecule in SLE is supported by several lines of evidence linking elevated serum BAFF to lupus pathogenesis. These include lupus-like disease in BAFF overexpression murine models [35, 36], increased serum BAFF levels in human lupus patients [37], and a genetic risk polymorphism in the TNFSF13B gene associated with the development of SLE [38]. These observations spurred the development of BAFF inhibition as a strategy to treat renal and non-renal SLE. In 2011, the FDA approved belimumab for the treatment of extra-renal SLE, based on two large phase III randomized clinical trials, BLISS-52 and BLISS-76. Both studies, involving > 1500 total combined patients, demonstrated improved clinical outcomes, as assessed by improvement in SRI (SLE Responder Index), reduced flares, reduced steroid use, and improved serologic activity at 52 and 76 weeks, without increase in rates of serious adverse events [39, 40]. Notably, belimumab was also studied in children with SLE in a phase-2, randomized, double-blinded study examining efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PLUTO Part A). Children aged 5 to 17 years with active SLE were randomized to receive intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks or placebo in combination with standard therapy for 52 weeks. A higher proportion of children in the treatment arm (52.8%) met the primary endpoint of SLE Responder Index (SRI4) response rate compared to with placebo (43.6%) without an increase in adverse events [41].
A notable caveat in both the BLISS and PLUTO trials was that patients with severe active lupus nephritis were excluded. However, a pooled post-hoc analysis of subjects in the BLISS trials with evidence of kidney involvement at enrollment demonstrated more frequent and rapid onset of renal remission, greater reductions in proteinuria, and reduced renal flares in the belimumab arms compared with standard therapy [42]. For this reason, a large multinational, multicenter randomized controlled trial of belimumab in biopsy-confirmed active lupus nephritis was conducted (BLISS-LN). 448 patients were randomized to belimumab 10 mg/kg IV q 4 weeks vs. placebo in addition to standard initial therapy (MMF or cyclophosphamide plus corticosteroids). Primary efficacy renal response was defined as urine protein to creatinine ratio (uPCR) < 0.7, eGFR less that 20% below baseline (or > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and no use of rescue therapy. The secondary endpoint of complete renal response (CRR) was defined as uPCR < 0.5 and eGFR < 10% of baseline or > 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. At 104 weeks, a significantly greater proportion of belimumab-treated patients demonstrated primary renal efficacy (43% vs. 32%; P = 0.03) and CRR (30% vs. 20%; P = 0.02) compared to the placebo group. Although the absolute rate of clinical improvement in this and other BLISS trials was small (~ 10%), belimumab has an excellent long-term safety profile and is known to reduce disease flares and damage accrual in SLE [43, 44]. Belimumab and potentially other BAFF inhibitors thus have an important role as adjunctive therapy for lupus nephritis. Based on these data, the US FDA approved belimumab for adult patients with active lupus nephritis who are receiving standard therapy in December 2020. Although experience with BAFF blockade in childhood-onset lupus nephritis remains limited, randomized trials of non-renal SLE have demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety of belimumab in pediatric and adult patients [41, 45]. These pediatric data have facilitated regulatory approval for the treatment of extra-renal lupus from age 5. In summary, while important questions remain regarding appropriate patient selection and duration of treatment, BAFF inhibition is a welcome addition to the repertoire of available therapies to treat proliferative lupus nephritis.
Voclosporin
Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), particularly tacrolimus and cyclosporin, have long been explored as alternate therapies for the treatment of lupus nephritis. Potential benefits for this class of medications include both inhibition of T cell activation and also direct anti-proteinuric effects via stabilization of the podocyte cytoskeleton [46, 47]. Owing to its more favorable side effect profile and higher potency, tacrolimus is generally preferred over cyclosporin in the treatment of lupus nephritis [48, 49]. A 2015 meta-analysis demonstrated that tacrolimus monotherapy was comparable to MMF and more effective than IV cyclophosphamide at inducing complete remission, while combined MMF and tacrolimus exerted greater clinical benefit than IV cyclophosphamide [50]. However, complex pharmacokinetics requiring frequent drug level monitoring and the potential for both acute and chronic nephrotoxicity have presented challenges in the use of tacrolimus in lupus nephritis [51].
Voclosporin is a cyclosporin analog with an improved pharmacokinetic profile that does not require drug level monitoring [52]. Since the initial discovery of this compound in the mid-1990s, voclosporin has been studied for multiple conditions, including uveitis [53], plaque psoriasis [54], and kidney transplantation [55]. In each case, promising clinical data was not translated into regulatory approval. This changed after Aurinia Pharmaceuticals acquired the rights to pursue voclosporin as a treatment for autoimmune conditions and designed the phase II (AURA-LV) and phase III (AURORA 1) randomized controlled trials of voclosporin for active lupus nephritis. In AURA-LV, 265 adults with active lupus nephritis were randomized to receive two voclosporin doses (23.7 mg or 39.5 mg BID) or placebo in addition to standard MMF and low dose corticosteroid initial therapy. The primary endpoint was CRR at 24 weeks, defined as uPCR < 0.5 plus eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with less than 20% decrease from baseline eGFR. Based on this metric, voclosporin was superior to standard therapy at both 24 weeks (CRR: 32.6% (low-dose) vs. 27.3% (high-dose) vs. 19.3% (placebo)) and 48 weeks (CRR: 49.4% (low-dose) vs. 39.8% (high-dose) vs. 23.9% (placebo)). Kaplan–Meier analysis also showed more rapid initial CRR in both voclosporin doses compared with placebo. Unfortunately, these clinical benefits were offset by more serious adverse events, including increased deaths in the low-dose voclosporin group (11.2% (low-dose) vs. 2.3% (high-dose) vs. 1.1% (placebo)) [56].
Analysis of these data informed the design of a subsequent phase III clinical trial of the lower voclosporin dose (23.7 mg twice per day) in active lupus nephritis (AURORA 1). In this 52-week study, 357 adults with biopsy-confirmed lupus nephritis were randomized to receive voclosporin or placebo in addition to standard MMF and low-dose prednisone initial therapy. The primary endpoint was similar to the phase II AURA-LV study, a composite CRR endpoint of uPCR < 0.5, eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (or less than 20% decrease from baseline), no need for rescue medications, and steroid dose of 10 mg prednisone per day or less. Complete renal response rates were significantly higher in the voclosporin arm (41% voclosporin vs. 23% placebo; odds ratio 2.65 (95% CI 1.6–4.3); p < 0.0001), whereas adverse events were reassuringly similar in both groups, including no new onset hypertension, hyperkalemia, or hypomagnesemia [57].
In summary, independent clinical trials showed benefit for a new fixed dose calcineurin inhibitor in active lupus nephritis. In January 2021, the FDA approved voclosporin in combination with background immunosuppression for the treatment of adults with active lupus nephritis. While this new therapeutic option for patients is welcome, important questions remain regarding the use of voclosporin for lupus nephritis. First, although chronic rejection and not direct drug toxicity is likely a major driver of progressive allograft fibrosis in CNI-treated kidney transplant recipients, long-term CNI treatment has been linked with chronic renal fibrosis in non-renal transplant populations [58, 59]. Whether voclosporin treatment carries a similar risk of chronic nephrotoxicity has not been determined, but this concern may be more pertinent to childhood-onset SLE given the need to maintain kidney function for decades. Reassuringly, preliminary data from the AURA2 long-term extension study shows no decline in eGFR following 2 years of voclosporin treatment [60]. Second, it is not yet clear whether the rapid decline in proteinuria in the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies is explained by induction of immunologic remission or via podocyte-specific anti-proteinuric effects. If the latter, reduced medication adherence in real world settings may be accompanied by frequent relapse of proteinuric kidney disease. Ultimately, these theoretical concerns are offset by the welcome addition of a new FDA-approved calcineurin inhibitor able to induce remission in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis without requiring frequent drug level monitoring.
New and emerging therapies
In addition to the two new FDA-approved therapies, multiple other medications are currently under development for the treatment of lupus nephritis. For the majority of these medications, clinical trials are ongoing and limited data are available to suggest potential efficacy. For this reason, we will describe recently published data on the use of obinutuzumab in lupus nephritis in detail. The remaining active lupus nephritis clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov are summarized in Table 4 and Fig. 1.
Obinutuzumab
Dysregulated B cell activation is a key driver of lupus pathogenesis [34, 61]. For this reason, B cell depletion has long been considered a promising therapeutic strategy in SLE. However, despite promising data from small initial studies, rituximab, a monoclonal depleting antibody targeting the B cell antigen CD20, failed to meet primary efficacy endpoints in two large randomized controlled studies in extra-renal SLE and lupus nephritis, respectively (EXPLORER and LUNAR) [27, 28]. A separate anti-CD20 depleting antibody, ocrelizumab, demonstrated numerically but not statistically significant improvements in lupus outcomes compared to standard therapy, but higher rates of infectious complications limited further development of this agent [29].
These clinical failures raised important questions regarding the role for B cells in lupus disease. Perhaps patient heterogeneity and challenges in designing appropriate endpoints in lupus clinical trials masked the efficacy of B cell depletion therapies [62]. Alternatively, since disease-defining anti-nuclear antibodies can predate lupus clinical symptoms by years [63], the primary role for B cells may be to initiate an inflammatory cascade in SLE, rather than sustain tissue damage in established disease. Finally, rituximab-resistant CD20neg plasma cells may be an underappreciated driver of lupus pathogenesis [64]. While these factors may have contributed to negative trial results, both animal and human data suggest that the failure to completely eliminate CD20+ B cells is a major contributor to the clinical inefficacy of rituximab in SLE. For example, post hoc analysis of the LUNAR lupus nephritis trial showed that the depth of B cell depletion correlated with improved renal responses [65]. This is relevant since tissue-resident CD20+ B cells are known to resist depletion following rituximab treatment in both human lupus patients and in murine lupus models [66].
For these reasons, new “type II” anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been engineered for more potent B cell cytotoxicity. One such agent, obinutuzumab, exhibits greater direct cell killing and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) compared with rituximab, resulting in enhanced B cell ablation in follicular lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, and SLE [67,68,69]. These improved pharmacologic characteristics prompted the design of a phase II trial of obinutuzumab in active lupus nephritis (NOBILITY). Notably, addition of obinutuzumab to background MMF resulted in increased CRR rates at both 52 weeks (35% (obinutuzumab) vs. 23% (placebo), p = 0.115) and 104 weeks (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.026) [70]. Treatment was well tolerated with only modestly increased rates of infusion reactions and no serious adverse events. An ongoing phase III study of obinutuzumab (REGENCY trial) aims to examine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of obinutuzumab compared to placebo in combination with standard therapy in Class III and IV lupus nephritis. Patients will be randomized to two different obinutuzumab regimens (1000 mg IV at baseline and weeks 2, 24, 26, 50 and 52 or 1000 mg IV at baseline and weeks 2, 24, 26 and 52) or placebo in addition to MMF and prednisone, and followed for a primary endpoint of CRR at week 76 (NCT04221477). Placed in the context of the failed LUNAR trial of rituximab in lupus nephritis, these data suggest that B cell targeting may yet have a role in the treatment of lupus nephritis, provided anti-CD20 agents are selected for their ability to induce deep and durable B cell depletion.
Active lupus nephritis trials
Table 4 summarizes the active lupus nephritis clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. As an overall framework, we have divided these approaches into five main groups: (1) disruption of immune cell crosstalk; (2) specific cytokine blockade; (3) plasma cell and/or autoantibody targeted therapies; (4) complement cascade inhibitors; (5) cell signaling inhibitors; and (6) B cell targeted agents. Figure 1 summarizes each of these therapeutic approaches which may prove beneficial for the treatment of lupus nephritis.
Concluding remarks
After decades of minimal advancement, the past few years have heralded major achievements in the ability to treat proliferative lupus nephritis, one of the most severe clinical manifestations of SLE. This is particularly important for pediatric patients who exhibit a higher risk for developing lupus nephritis and have a longer potential to accrue kidney damage. Although the studies described above report promising efficacy and safety in adults, questions remain regarding the use of these new therapeutic agents in children-onset lupus nephritis including the potential for pediatric specific drug toxicity. For example, the use of B cell targeted therapies prior to completion of primary immunization schedule may increase the risk of poor vaccine response. Moreover, while Janus kinase (JAK) signaling inhibition has shown promise in adult-onset extra-renal SLE, blocking growth hormone (GH)-mediated JAK2 phosphorylation might theoretically decrease linear growth in childhood [71]. Alternatively, these new biologic agents may carry pediatric-specific benefits by sparing children from long-term treatment with corticosteroids or cytotoxic agents, which are known to negatively affect growth, development, and fertility. Relying on off-label use and extrapolating dosing guidelines from adult studies subjects children to treatment without clearly understanding the age-specific risk–benefit ratio. For these reasons, efforts must be made to promote inclusion of children and adolescents in drug development trials for glomerular diseases. The Pediatric Working Group (of the NephCure Kidney International Gateway Initiative) is a group that is spearheading the initiative to facilitate the inclusion of pediatric patients in clinical trials for glomerular diseases through engagement with regulatory authorities in the USA and Europe [72].
Despite this lack of pediatric-specific data, regulatory approval of belimumab, voclosporin, and potentially obinutuzumab in the future, will provide multiple new treatment options for the pediatric nephrology community. In addition, academic clinicians and pharmaceutical companies are pursuing multiple independent strategies which may yield additional benefits to patients. Given the heterogeneity of human SLE and the lack of pediatric clinical trial data, a major challenge will be to identify which patients are likely to gain the most benefit from each of these novel agents. Future observational studies are needed to provide additional guidance on clinical decision-making on optimal timing and duration of therapy as well as appropriate patient selection for these new agents. Finally, improved biomarkers of disease activity and remission are also needed to inform the duration of therapy and balance effective control of inflammation with long-term drug toxicity.
Summary points
-
The current standard of care for initial therapy in pediatric proliferative lupus nephritis specifies the use of cyclophosphamide or MMF in conjunction with corticosteroids
-
Belimumab, a monoclonal antibody against BAFF (B cell activating factor), and voclosporin, a cyclosporin analog with improved pharmacokinetic characteristics, are two newly FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of adult lupus nephritis
-
Obinutuzumab is a new drug under development for treatment of lupus nephritis and has been shown in phase II trials to be effective and well tolerated
-
There are numerous ongoing clinical trials examining the diverse immunologic drivers of renal inflammation and potential drug targets lupus nephritis
Multiple choice questions (answers can be found after the reference list)
-
1.
What is the current standard of care for initial therapy for pediatric proliferative lupus nephritis?
-
A.
MMF and corticosteroids
-
B.
Cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids
-
C.
Tacrolimus and corticosteroids
-
D.
Corticosteroids only
-
E.
A and B
-
A.
-
2.
Which of the following statements is FALSE regarding the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) trial?
-
A.
MMF exhibited consistent efficacy across all racial/ethnic groups.
-
B.
More Black and Hispanic patients responded to MMF compared to IV cyclophosphamide
-
C.
Rates of adverse events were higher in the IV cyclophosphamide group
-
D.
MMF was found to be equally effective as IV cyclophosphamide, but not superior
-
A.
-
3.
Which of the following molecules does belimumab target?
-
A.
B cell activating factor
-
B.
CD20
-
C.
IL-6
-
D.
Type I INF receptor
-
E.
Complement factor D
-
A.
-
4.
Which of the following drugs is FDA-approved for the treatment of adult active lupus nephritis in combination with background immunosuppression after being shown to induce higher rates of complete renal remission compared to standard therapy alone?
-
A.
Obinutuzumab
-
B.
Voclosporin
-
C.
Ocrelizumab
-
D.
Rituximab
-
E.
Tacrolimus
-
A.
-
5.
Which of the following is true regarding obinutuzumab?
-
A.
It failed to induce complete renal response rates higher than MMF in patients with lupus nephritis in the phase II trial
-
B.
It is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody
-
C.
Long-term treatment carries risk of chronic renal fibrosis
-
D.
Rituximab has been shown to exhibit greater antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity than obinutuzumab
-
E.
It is only effective in the treatment of extra-renal SLE
-
A.
References
Malattia C, Martini A (2013) Paediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 27:351–362
Pinheiro SVB, Dias RF, Fabiano RCG, Araujo SA, Silva A (2019) Pediatric lupus nephritis J Bras Nefrol 41:252–265
Wenderfer SE, Chang JC, Goodwin Davies A, Luna IY, Scobell R, Sears C, Magella B, Mitsnefes M, Stotter BR, Dharnidharka VR, Nowicki KD, Dixon BP, Kelton M, Flynn JT, Gluck C, Kallash M, Smoyer WE, Knight A, Sule S, Razzaghi H, Bailey LC, Furth SL, Forrest CB, Denburg MR, Atkinson MA (2022) Using a multi-institutional pediatric learning health system to identify systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: development and validation of computable phenotypes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 17:65–74
Hiraki LT, Feldman CH, Liu J, Alarcon GS, Fischer MA, Winkelmayer WC, Costenbader KH (2012) Prevalence, incidence, and demographics of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis from 2000 to 2004 among children in the US Medicaid beneficiary population. Arthritis Rheum 64:2669–2676
Fiorot FJ, Islabao AG, Pereira RM, Terreri MT, Saad-Magalhaes C, Novak GV, Molinari BC, Sakamoto AP, Aikawa NE, Campos LM, Peracchi OA, Appenzeller S, Ferriani VP, Silva MF, Fonseca AR, Sztajnbok FR, Paim LB, Fraga MM, Okuda EM, Bica BE, Sena EG, Moraes AJ, Rolim AM, Spelling PF, Scheibel IM, Cavalcanti AS, Matos EN, Robazzi TC, Guimaraes LJ, Santos FP, Ramos VC, Carneiro-Sampaio M, Bonfa E, Silva CA, Brazilian Childhood-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Group (2019) Disease presentation of 1312 childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: influence of ethnicity. Clin Rheumatol 38:2857–2863
Demir S, Gulhan B, Ozen S, Celegen K, Batu ED, Tas N, Orhan D, Bilginer Y, Duzova A, Ozaltin F, Topaloglu R (2021) Long term renal survival of pediatric patients with lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 37:1069–1077
Lech M, Anders HJ (2013) The pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 24:1357–1366
Yung S, Yap DY, Chan TM (2020) A review of advances in the understanding of lupus nephritis pathogenesis as a basis for emerging therapies. F1000Res 9:F1000
Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, Balow JE, Bruijn JA, Cook T, Ferrario F, Fogo AB, Ginzler EM, Hebert L, Hill G, Hill P, Jennette JC, Kong NC, Lesavre P, Lockshin M, Looi LM, Makino H, Moura LA, Nagata M (2004) The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:241–250
Bajema IM, Wilhelmus S, Alpers CE, Bruijn JA, Colvin RB, Cook HT, D’Agati VD, Ferrario F, Haas M, Jennette JC, Joh K, Nast CC, Noel LH, Rijnink EC, Roberts ISD, Seshan SV, Sethi S, Fogo AB (2018) Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification for lupus nephritis: clarification of definitions, and modified National Institutes of Health activity and chronicity indices. Kidney Int 93:789–796
Hiraki LT, Benseler SM, Tyrrell PN, Hebert D, Harvey E, Silverman ED (2008) Clinical and laboratory characteristics and long-term outcome of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study. J Pediatr 152:550–556
Tunnicliffe DJ, Palmer SC, Henderson L, Masson P, Craig JC, Tong A, Singh-Grewal D, Flanc RS, Roberts MA, Webster AC, Strippoli GF (2018) Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD002922
Austin HA 3rd, Klippel JH, Balow JE, le Riche NG, Steinberg AD, Plotz PH, Decker JL (1986) Therapy of lupus nephritis. Controlled trial of prednisone and cytotoxic drugs. N Engl J Med 314:614–619
Chan TM, Li FK, Tang CS, Wong RW, Fang GX, Ji YL, Lau CS, Wong AK, Tong MK, Chan KW, Lai KN (2000) Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Hong Kong-Guangzhou Nephrology Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:1156–1162
Falk RJ (2000) Treatment of lupus nephritis–a work in progress. N Engl J Med 343:1182–1183
Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, Ginzler EM, Isenberg D, Jayne D, Li LS, Mysler E, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Solomons N, Wofsy D, Aspreva Lupus Management Study Group (2009) Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:1103–1112
Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D, Sebastiani GD, Garrido Ed Ede R, Danieli MG, Abramovicz D, Blockmans D, Mathieu A, Direskeneli H, Galeazzi M, Gul A, Levy Y, Petera P, Popovic R, Petrovic R, Sinico RA, Cattaneo R, Font J, Depresseux G, Cosyns JP, Cervera R (2002) Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 46:2121–2131
ACCESS Trial Group (2014) Treatment of lupus nephritis with abatacept: the Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study. Arthritis Rheumatol 66:3096–3104
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, Anders HJ, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis J, Frangou E, Houssiau FA, Hollis J, Karras A, Marchiori F, Marks SD, Moroni G, Mosca M, Parodis I, Praga M, Schneider M, Smolen JS, Tesar V, Trachana M, van Vollenhoven RF, Voskuyl AE, Teng YKO, van Leew B, Bertsias G, Jayne D, Boumpas DT (2020) 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 79:713–723
Rovin BH, Caster DJ, Cattran DC, Gibson KL, Hogan JJ, Moeller MJ, Roccatello D, Cheung M, Wheeler DC, Winkelmayer WC, Floege J, Conference Participants (2019) Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 2): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int 95:281–295
Mina R, von Scheven E, Ardoin SP, Eberhard BA, Punaro M, Ilowite N, Hsu J, Klein-Gitelman M, Moorthy LN, Muscal E, Radhakrishna SM, Wagner-Weiner L, Adams M, Blier P, Buckley L, Chalom E, Chedeville G, Eichenfield A, Fish N, Henrickson M, Hersh AO, Hollister R, Jones O, Jung L, Levy D, Lopez-Benitez J, McCurdy D, Miettunen PM, Quintero-del Rio AI, Rothman D, Rullo O, Ruth N, Schanberg LE, Silverman E, Singer NG, Soep J, Syed R, Vogler LB, Yalcindag A, Yildirim-Toruner C, Wallace CA, Brunner HI, Carra SLE Subcommittee (2012) Consensus treatment plans for induction therapy of newly diagnosed proliferative lupus nephritis in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:375–383
Groot N, de Graeff N, Marks SD, Brogan P, Avcin T, Bader-Meunier B, Dolezalova P, Feldman BM, Kone-Paut I, Lahdenne P, McCann L, Ozen S, Pilkington CA, Ravelli A, Royen-Kerkhof AV, Uziel Y, Vastert BJ, Wulffraat NM, Beresford MW, Kamphuis S (2017) European evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of childhood-onset lupus nephritis: the SHARE initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 76:1965–1973
Yo JH, Barbour TD, Nicholls K (2019) Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and solutions. Open Access Rheumatol 11:179–188
Merrill JT, Burgos-Vargas R, Westhovens R, Chalmers A, D’Cruz D, Wallace DJ, Bae SC, Sigal L, Becker JC, Kelly S, Raghupathi K, Li T, Peng Y, Kinaszczuk M, Nash P (2010) The efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with non-life-threatening manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a twelve-month, multicenter, exploratory, phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 62:3077–3087
Furie R, Nicholls K, Cheng TT, Houssiau F, Burgos-Vargas R, Chen SL, Hillson JL, Meadows-Shropshire S, Kinaszczuk M, Merrill JT (2014) Efficacy and safety of abatacept in lupus nephritis: a twelve-month, randomized, double-blind study. Arthritis Rheumatol 66:379–389
Efficacy and Safety Study of Abatacept to Treat Lupus Nephritis; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01714817
Rovin BH, Furie R, Latinis K, Looney RJ, Fervenza FC, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Maciuca R, Zhang D, Garg JP, Brunetta P, Appel G, LUNAR Investigator Group (2012) Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: the Lupus Nephritis Assessment with Rituximab study. Arthritis Rheum 64:1215–1226
Merrill JT, Neuwelt CM, Wallace DJ, Shanahan JC, Latinis KM, Oates JC, Utset TO, Gordon C, Isenberg DA, Hsieh HJ, Zhang D, Brunetta PG (2010) Efficacy and safety of rituximab in moderately-to-severely active systemic lupus erythematosus: the randomized, double-blind, phase II/III systemic lupus erythematosus evaluation of rituximab trial. Arthritis Rheum 62:222–233
Mysler EF, Spindler AJ, Guzman R, Bijl M, Jayne D, Furie RA, Houssiau FA, Drappa J, Close D, Maciuca R, Rao K, Shahdad S, Brunetta P (2013) Efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in active proliferative lupus nephritis: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Arthritis Rheum 65:2368–2379
Rovin BH, van Vollenhoven RF, Aranow C, Wagner C, Gordon R, Zhuang Y, Belkowski S, Hsu B (2016) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with sirukumab (CNTO 136) in patients with active lupus nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 68:2174–2183
Korbet SM, Lewis EJ, Schwartz MM, Reichlin M, Evans J, Rohde RD (2000) Factors predictive of outcome in severe lupus nephritis. Lupus Nephritis Collaborative Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 35:904–914
Demir S, Gulhan B, Ozen S, Celegen K, Batu ED, Tas N, Orhan D, Bilginer Y, Duzova A, Ozaltin F, Topaloglu R (2022) Long-term renal survival of paediatric patients with lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 37:1069–1077
Jackson SW, Davidson A (2019) BAFF inhibition in SLE-Is tolerance restored? Immunol Rev 292:102–119
Canny SP, Jackson SW (2021) B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: from disease mechanisms to targeted therapies. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 47:395–413
Mackay F, Woodcock SA, Lawton P, Ambrose C, Baetscher M, Schneider P, Tschopp J, Browning JL (1999) Mice transgenic for BAFF develop lymphocytic disorders along with autoimmune manifestations. J Exp Med 190:1697–1710
Arkatkar T, Jacobs HM, Du SW, Li QZ, Hudkins KL, Alpers CE, Rawlings DJ, Jackson SW (2018) TACI deletion protects against progressive murine lupus nephritis induced by BAFF overexpression. Kidney Int 94:728–740
Stohl W, Metyas S, Tan SM, Cheema GS, Oamar B, Xu D, Roschke V, Wu Y, Baker KP, Hilbert DM (2003) B lymphocyte stimulator overexpression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: longitudinal observations. Arthritis Rheum 48:3475–3486
Steri M, Orru V, Idda ML, Pitzalis M, Pala M, Zara I, Sidore C, Faa V, Floris M, Deiana M, Asunis I, Porcu E, Mulas A, Piras MG, Lobina M, Lai S, Marongiu M, Serra V, Marongiu M, Sole G, Busonero F, Maschio A, Cusano R, Cuccuru G, Deidda F, Poddie F, Farina G, Dei M, Virdis F, Olla S, Satta MA, Pani M, Delitala A, Cocco E, Frau J, Coghe G, Lorefice L, Fenu G, Ferrigno P, Ban M, Barizzone N, Leone M, Guerini FR, Piga M, Firinu D, Kockum I, Lima Bomfim I, Olsson T, Alfredsson L, Suarez A, Carreira PE, Castillo-Palma MJ, Marcus JH, Congia M, Angius A, Melis M, Gonzalez A, Alarcon Riquelme ME, da Silva BM, Marchini M, Danieli MG, Del Giacco S, Mathieu A, Pani A, Montgomery SB, Rosati G, Hillert J, Sawcer S, D’Alfonso S, Todd JA, Novembre J, Abecasis GR, Whalen MB, Marrosu MG, Meloni A, Sanna S, Gorospe M, Schlessinger D, Fiorillo E, Zoledziewska M, Cucca F (2017) Overexpression of the cytokine BAFF and autoimmunity risk. N Engl J Med 376:1615–1626
Navarra SV, Guzman RM, Gallacher AE, Hall S, Levy RA, Jimenez RE, Li EK, Thomas M, Kim HY, Leon MG, Tanasescu C, Nasonov E, Lan JL, Pineda L, Zhong ZJ, Freimuth W, Petri MA (2011) Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 377:721–731
Furie R, Petri M, Zamani O, Cervera R, Wallace DJ, Tegzova D, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Schwarting A, Merrill JT, Chatham WW, Stohl W, Ginzler EM, Hough DR, Zhong ZJ, Freimuth W, van Vollenhoven RF, BLISS-76 Study Group (2011) A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 63:3918–3930
Brunner HI, Abud-Mendoza C, Viola DO, Calvo Penades I, Levy D, Anton J, Calderon JE, Chasnyk VG, Ferrandiz MA, Keltsev V, Paz Gastanaga ME, Shishov M, Boteanu AL, Henrickson M, Bass D, Clark K, Hammer A, Ji BN, Nino A, Roth DA, Struemper H, Wang ML, Martini A, Lovell D, Ruperto N, Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) (2020) Safety and efficacy of intravenous belimumab in children with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 79:1340-1348
Dooley MA, Houssiau F, Aranow C, D'Cruz DP, Askanase A, Roth DA, Zhong ZJ, Cooper S, Freimuth WW, Ginzler EM; BLISS-52 and -76 Study Groups (2013) Effect of belimumab treatment on renal outcomes: results from the phase 3 belimumab clinical trials in patients with SLE. Lupus 22:63-72
Stohl W, Schwarting A, Okada M, Scheinberg M, Doria A, Hammer AE, Kleoudis C, Groark J, Bass D, Fox NL, Roth D, Gordon D (2017) Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: a fifty-two-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheumatol 69:1016–1027
Urowitz MB, Ohsfeldt RL, Wielage RC, Kelton KA, Asukai Y, Ramachandran S (2019) Organ damage in patients treated with belimumab versus standard of care: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 78:372–379
Brunner HI, Abud-Mendoza C, Mori M, Pilkington CA, Syed R, Takei S, Viola DO, Furie RA, Navarra S, Zhang F, Bass DL, Eriksson G, Hammer AE, Ji BN, Okily M, Roth DA, Quasny H, Ruperto N (2021) Efficacy and safety of belimumab in paediatric and adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an across-study comparison. RMD Open 7:e001747
Faul C, Donnelly M, Merscher-Gomez S, Chang YH, Franz S, Delfgaauw J, Chang JM, Choi HY, Campbell KN, Kim K, Reiser J, Mundel P (2008) The actin cytoskeleton of kidney podocytes is a direct target of the antiproteinuric effect of cyclosporine A. Nat Med 14:931–938
Liao R, Liu Q, Zheng Z, Fan J, Peng W, Kong Q, He H, Yang S, Chen W, Tang X, Yu X (2015) Tacrolimus protects podocytes from injury in lupus nephritis partly by stabilizing the cytoskeleton and inhibiting podocyte apoptosis. PLoS One 10:e0132724
Mok CC (2017) Calcineurin inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 31:429–438
Takeuchi H, Okuyama K, Konno O, Jojima Y, Akashi I, Nakamura Y, Iwamoto H, Hama K, Iwahori T, Uchiyama M, Ashizawa T, Matsuno N, Nagao T, Hirano T, Oka K (2005) Optimal dose and target trough level in cyclosporine and tacrolimus conversion in renal transplantation as evaluated by lymphocyte drug sensitivity and pharmacokinetic parameters. Transplant Proc 37:1745–1747
Hannah J, Casian A, D’Cruz D (2016) Tacrolimus use in lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev 15:93–101
Fernandez Nieto M, Jayne DR (2016) Con: the use of calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 31:1567–1571
Sin FE, Isenberg D (2018) An evaluation of voclosporin for the treatment of lupus nephritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 19:1613–1621
Schultz C (2013) Voclosporin as a treatment for noninfectious uveitis. Ophthalmol Eye Dis 5:5–10
Kunynetz R, Carey W, Thomas R, Toth D, Trafford T, Vender R (2011) Quality of life in plaque psoriasis patients treated with voclosporin: a Canadian phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Dermatol 21:89–94
Busque S, Cantarovich M, Mulgaonkar S, Gaston R, Gaber AO, Mayo PR, Ling S, Huizinga RB, Meier-Kriesche HU, Investigators PROMISE (2011) The PROMISE study: a phase 2b multicenter study of voclosporin (ISA247) versus tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 11:2675–2684
Rovin BH, Solomons N, Pendergraft WF, 3rd, Dooley MA, Tumlin J, Romero-Diaz J, Lysenko L, Navarra SV, Huizinga RB, AURA-LV Study Group (2019) A randomized, controlled double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of dose-ranging voclosporin with placebo in achieving remission in patients with active lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 95:219-231
Rovin BH, Teng YKO, Ginzler EM, Arriens C, Caster DJ, Romero-Diaz J, Gibson K, Kaplan J, Lisk L, Navarra S, Parikh SV, Randhawa S, Solomons N, Huizinga RB (2021) Efficacy and safety of voclosporin versus placebo for lupus nephritis (AURORA 1): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 397:2070–2080
Chapman JR (2011) Chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity-lest we forget. Am J Transplant 11:693–697
Karolin A, Genitsch V, Sidler D (2021) Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in solid organ transplantation. Pharmacology 106:347–355
Saxena A, Mina-Osorio P, Mela C, Birardi V, Randhawa S (2021) 514 Voclosporin for lupus nephritis: interim analysis of the AURORA 2 extension study. Lupus Sci Med 8:A20–A21
Lipsky PE (2001) Systemic lupus erythematosus: an autoimmune disease of B cell hyperactivity. Nat Immunol 2:764–766
Merrill JT, Manzi S, Aranow C, Askenase A, Bruce I, Chakravarty E, Chong B, Costenbader K, Dall’Era M, Ginzler E, Hanrahan L, Kalunian K, Merola J, Raymond S, Rovin B, Saxena A, Werth VP (2018) Lupus community panel proposals for optimising clinical trials: 2018. Lupus Sci Med 5:e000258
Arbuckle MR, McClain MT, Rubertone MV, Scofield RH, Dennis GJ, James JA, Harley JB (2003) Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 349:1526–1533
Hale M, Rawlings DJ, Jackson SW (2018) The long and the short of it: insights into the cellular source of autoantibodies as revealed by B cell depletion therapy. Curr Opin Immunol 55:81–88
Gomez Mendez LM, Cascino MD, Garg J, Katsumoto TR, Brakeman P, Dall’Era M, Looney RJ, Rovin B, Dragone L, Brunetta P (2018) Peripheral Blood B Cell Depletion after rituximab and complete response in lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1502–1509
Ahuja A, Shupe J, Dunn R, Kashgarian M, Kehry MR, Shlomchik MJ (2007) Depletion of B cells in murine lupus: efficacy and resistance. J Immunol 179:3351–3361
Freeman CL, Sehn LH (2018) A tale of two antibodies: obinutuzumab versus rituximab. Br J Haematol 182:29–45
Reddy V, Klein C, Isenberg DA, Glennie MJ, Cambridge G, Cragg MS, Leandro MJ (2017) Obinutuzumab induces superior B-cell cytotoxicity to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patient samples. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:1227–1237
Marcus R, Davies A, Ando K, Klapper W, Opat S, Owen C, Phillips E, Sangha R, Schlag R, Seymour JF, Townsend W, Trneny M, Wenger M, Fingerle-Rowson G, Rufibach K, Moore T, Herold M, Hiddemann W (2017) Obinutuzumab for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med 377:1331–1344
Furie RA, Aroca G, Cascino MD, Garg JP, Rovin BH, Alvarez A, Fragoso-Loyo H, Zuta-Santillan E, Schindler T, Brunetta P, Looney CM, Hassan I, Malvar A (2022) B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab for the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 81:100–107
Argetsinger LS, Campbell GS, Yang X, Witthuhn BA, Silvennoinen O, Ihle JN, Carter-Su C (1993) Identification of JAK2 as a growth hormone receptor-associated tyrosine kinase. Cell 74:237–244
Gipson DS, Tarnoff J, Lee L, Vivarelli M, Levtchenko E, Oh J, Smoyer WE, Desmond H, Attalla S, Trachtman H (2021) A pediatric gateway initiative for glomerular disease: introducing PIONEER. Kidney Int 99:515–518
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under award numbers: R01AR073938 (SWJ), R01AR075813 (SWJ), 5T32DK007662 (MK). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Additional support provided by the Arthritis National Research Foundation (ANRF) Eng Tan Scholar Award (SWJ); and by a Lupus Research Alliance, Novel Research Grants (SWJ). Figures were created with BioRender.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Answers:
1. E; 2. C; 3. A; 4. B; 5. B
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaneko, M., Jackson, S.W. Recent advances in immunotherapies for lupus nephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 38, 1001–1012 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05670-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05670-7