Abstract
Trait variation among populations is important for shaping ecological dynamics. In marine intertidal systems, seawater temperature, low tide emersion temperature, and pH can drive variation in traits and affect species interactions. In western North America, Nucella dogwhelks are intertidal drilling predators of the habitat-forming mussel Mytilus californianus. Nucella exhibit local adaptation, but it is not known to what extent environmental factors and genetic structure contribute to variation in prey selectivity among populations. We surveyed drilled mussels at sites across Oregon and California, USA, and used multiple regression and Mantel tests to test the effects of abiotic factors and Nucella neutral genetic relatedness on the size of mussels drilled across sites. Our results show that Nucella at sites characterized by higher and less variable temperature and pH drilled larger mussels. Warmer temperatures appear to induce faster handling time, and more stable pH conditions may prolong opportunities for active foraging by reducing exposure to repeated stressful conditions. In contrast, there was no significant effect of genetic relatedness on prey size selectivity. Our results emphasize the role of climate in shaping marine predator selectivity on a foundation species. As coastal climates change, predator traits will respond to localized environmental conditions, changing ecological interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Intraspecific trait variation is an important component of biodiversity that can shape communities by changing ecological interactions (Palkovacs and Post 2009; Harmon et al. 2009; Palkovacs et al. 2009; Bolnick et al. 2011; Ingram et al. 2012; Royauté and Pruitt 2015; Fryxell and Palkovacs 2017; Des Roches et al. 2018). Variation in predator traits can alter entire food webs, yet evidence for this phenomenon comes almost entirely from freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems (Post et al. 2008; Palkovacs and Post 2009; Royauté and Pruitt 2015). Only recently have ecologists begun to appreciate intraspecific trait variation among marine populations, long considered too open to exhibit local adaptation, which can fine-tune the traits of populations to suit their local environments (Kawecki and Ebert 2004; Sanford and Kelly 2011). To advance our understanding of ecologically important trait variation in the marine environment, it is important to examine this variation at the population level and identify the underlying drivers.
Climate variables like temperature and pH can alter foraging traits in marine predators. For example, temperature alters feeding rate in intertidal Nucella dogwhelks (Yamane and Gilman 2009; Miller 2013; King and Sebens 2018), and elevated seawater pCO2 shifts prey size selectivity in Nucella lapillus (Sadler et al. 2018). Consistent differences in these abiotic factors can lead to population differences in foraging traits due to local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity. However, patterns of genetic relatedness among populations can also underlie trait similarities despite environmental differences (Endler 1973; Felsenstein 1985; Thorpe 1996; Hendry et al. 2001; Lenormand 2002). We evaluate the effects of local environment and genetic relatedness as drivers of trait variation among populations of a low-dispersing marine intertidal predator.
In intertidal zones in the California Current System of western North America, dogwhelks of the genus Nucella are important predators, consuming sedentary, foundational prey (West 1986). Nucella have direct-developing larvae and very low dispersal ability (Strathmann 1987), which gives them an increased ability to adapt to environmental conditions such as temperature and pH that affect foraging strategies (Yamane and Gilman 2009; Queirós et al. 2015; Cerny-Chipman 2016; King and Sebens 2018; Sadler et al. 2018). For example, populations of N. canaliculata exhibit local adaptation in mussel prey selectivity (Sanford et al. 2003; Sanford and Worth 2010). Here we examine differences in prey selectivity among populations of the Nucella ostrina-emarginata species complex (hereafter Nucella). This species complex is made up of individuals identified as N. ostrina or N. emarginata, which have conflicting morphological and molecular evidence for their distinctness (Marko 1998, 2005; Dawson et al. 2014); thus, we consider them together for ecological analyses. Differences in prey selectivity among populations could be due to patterns of genetic relatedness, adaptation, plasticity to local abiotic conditions, or some combination of these factors.
We explore the effects of temperature, pH, and neutral population genetic relatedness in shaping variation in Nucella size selectivity for the foundational mussel Mytilus californianus throughout Oregon and California, USA. Our main questions are: (1) How do temperature and pH regimes shape variation among populations in Nucella size selectivity for M. californianus? and (2) Do populations with higher genetic relatedness exhibit more similar size selectivity? We predict that temperature will have important effects on size selectivity because it is known to influence Nucella foraging and ingestion rates (Largen 1967; Bayne and Scullard 1978; Sanford 2002; Yamane and Gilman 2009; Miller 2013; King and Sebens 2018). We further expect that pH will shape prey size selectivity because it affects prey detection and predation rate across a wide range of taxa (de la Haye et al. 2012; Pistevos et al. 2015; Watson et al. 2017), including other Nucella species (Queirós et al. 2015; Cerny-Chipman 2016; Sadler et al. 2018). We hypothesize that neutral genetic relatedness will not have a strong effect on size selectivity because Nucella populations have limited dispersal, providing ample opportunity for local adaptation and plasticity to modify feeding traits (Strathmann 1987; Marko 1998; Sanford et al. 2003; Dawson et al. 2014). Temperate mussel beds provide habitat for hundreds of species and are strongly influenced by top-down interactions (Paine 1966); therefore, understanding the drivers of variation in predator selectivity, such as Nucella prey size selectivity, will help link larger ecological and climate processes to mussel bed structure and diversity.
Materials and methods
Study species
Nucella are dogwhelk predators that feed on sedentary shelled animals including Mytilus spp. mussels. Members of the Nucella ostrina-emarginata species complex are the primary mussel drilling predators in the mid-intertidal, as other Nucella species like N. canaliculata inhabit lower shore levels (Morris et al. 1980). Nucella feed by drilling, leaving a characteristic ≈ 1 mm diameter hole in their prey, making it easy to track predation across space and time (Clelland and Saleuddin 2000). Though it may take days for a dogwhelk to consume one mussel, Nucella in high densities can have significant negative effects on mussel density (Hughes and de Dunkin 1984; Suchanek 1986; Menge et al. 1994; Navarrete and Menge 1996; Sanford et al. 2003). We focus on predation of Mytilus californianus rather than congeners like M. trossulus because M. californianus is competitively dominant, more abundant, and important for intertidal community diversity (Kanter 1977; Suchanek 1978b, 1992; Palmer et al. 1990; Navarrete 1994, 1996; Lafferty and Suchanek 2016). M. californianus mussel bed structural complexity, which is largely determined by mussel size, is positively correlated with species diversity. Anything that affects mussel size structure can therefore shape intertidal diversity (Kanter 1977; Suchanek 1992; Suchanek 1978a, b).
Characterization of environmental variables
We studied Nucella drilling selectivity at eight intertidal sites in Oregon and California, USA with different climate regimes (Fig. 1, Table S1). To describe the different regimes, we used three data sets: seawater pH from the Ocean Margins Ecosystem Group for Acidification Studies (OMEGAS, Menge et al. 2015), low tide emersion temperatures from intertidal biomimetic temperature sensors (Helmuth et al. 2016), and seawater temperatures from the Partnership for the Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans (PISCO; http://www.piscoweb.org/access-data). For the pH data, we used 10-min interval measurements of pH made using Durafet® pH sensors modified by OMEGAS and secured to the intertidal zone from Apr-2013 to Oct-2013 (Chan et al. 2017). The OMEGAS group monitored seawater chemistry during this time, the core upwelling season, to capture pH profiles during the most dynamic and biologically stressful period, and because winter deployments are often unfeasible due to increased wave stress. We calculated summary statistics on seawater pH including mean, median, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, various percentiles, and frequency of exposure below pH values known to induce pH stress (Fig. S1, Table S2; Hofmann et al. 2014; Kroeker et al. 2016). We excluded all environmental data from our southernmost site, Lompoc, where the pH sensor was damaged.
To characterize the emersion thermal dynamics of intertidal mussel beds, we used data from the intertidal biomimetic temperature sensors (Helmuth et al. 2016). We include emersion temperature in addition to water temperature because in intertidal zones, the two temperature regimes can be different in unexpected ways (e.g., not following a latitudinal gradient) and elicit different biological responses (Helmuth et al. 2006; Yamane and Gilman 2009; King and Sebens 2018). Biomimetic loggers are preferred to traditional temperature loggers for emersion temperature because traditional loggers often record highly unrealistic values due to their unnatural color and shape (Fitzhenry et al. 2004). Rather than act as approximations of dogwhelk body temperatures, these temperature data were used to represent the site-specific emersion temperature of the mussel bed to which dogwhelks would adjust foraging behaviors; for example, dogwhelks can face a tradeoff between foraging and seeking thermal refugia at low tide (Burrows and Hughes 1989; Hayford et al. 2015). The biomimetic sensors were fashioned out of marine epoxy to the size, shape, and color of M. californianus mussels and secured in the mussel bed, recording temperature every 10 min. We used data as available for all sites in low and lower-mid intertidal zones from 02-May-2013 to 21-Sep-2013. Since high emersion temperatures are thought to limit intertidal organisms, the cooler low-zone thermal dynamics provided conservative estimates of heat stress for our study (Connell 1961). To parse emersion and water temperatures, we aligned these temperature data to tidal height using the “WWW Tide/Current Predictor” (http://tbone.biol.sc.edu/tide) and identified at what tidal height low tide temperatures differed noticeably from high tide temperatures (i.e., the sensor was emersed vs. immersed). We determined the appropriate emersion tidal height for each site and used it as a threshold for when to classify temperature as emersed versus immersed, excluding temperature values ± 0.15 m around the threshold height when it is difficult to tell whether the sensor is immersed. After parsing emersion and immersion temperatures, we calculated summary statistics for emersion including median, minimum, maximum, standard deviation, and, since upper thermal tolerance determines the distribution of many intertidal organisms, the frequency of temperatures over 24, 26, 28, and 30 °C (Connell 1961; Table S2).
While OMEGAS pH and biomimetic temperature logger data were only available for spring and summer 2013, intertidal water temperature was available for all seasons from a larger time range. We used PISCO temperature loggers (HOBO, Onset Corporation) to characterize seawater temperature dynamics over the upwelling season and throughout the entire year for 2009 through 2013. This data set reflects the characteristic immersed thermal environments which dogwhelk populations had experienced over a 5-year period prior to our field sampling. This approach allowed us to characterize the long-term patterns of seawater temperatures at the sites and to compare water to emersion thermal dynamics and the upwelling season to the full year (Fig. S2). We calculated summary statistics (mean, median, min, max, frequency of water temperature above 10, 12, 14, and 16 °C) on the daily average temperature at each site for each year, then averaged across years. Upwelling thermal dynamics matched well with full year dynamics, so we used temperature data for full years in our analyses. The 2013 upwelling water temperature dynamics were similar to the 5-year dynamics, supporting that the 2013 upwelling pH and emersion temperature dynamics were also similar to long-term dynamics (Fig. S3).
Finally, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize the combined environmental regimes of the sites, including all previously listed pH, emersion and water temperature metrics (Fig. S1; prcomp() function in stats package in R; R Core Team 2017). These climate regime axes were later used as predictors in a multiple regression of drilling selectivity.
Drilling selectivity
To measure Nucella drilling selectivity, we surveyed mid intertidal M. californianus mussel beds for drilled mussels between Mar-2015 and Jun-2015 (except Lompoc in Nov-2015). At sites where pH sensors were still present, we performed our surveys as close as possible to the sensor, often a few meters away. At each site, we collected all dead mussels with a borehole within 2 m diameter plots (n = 3–4 per site, total n = 27) where Nucella were present. Dead mussel shells can remain in the mussel bed for as long as 8 months, so boreholes provide a long-term estimate of Nucella predation (Suchanek 1978a, b; Sanford and Worth 2009). To determine if Nucella are size-selective for prey, we subsampled undrilled mussels in the 2 m diameter plots by haphazardly placing four 15 cm diameter quadrats within the plots and collecting all mussels in them. Since the ranges of congeners M. trossulus and M. galloprovincialis overlap with M. californianus, we identified mussels to species level morphologically and confirmed they were absent or very uncommon in our plots (< 20 at any site and < 40 overall). We accounted for mussel growth between the time of dogwhelk drilling and our collection using average growth rates of M. californianus from mussel growth surveys in central California (Menge et al. 2004) and Oregon (Behrens Yamada and Dunham 1989), calculating mean growth over 8 months, subtracting this potential growth from our sample means, then redoing all analyses.
We measured shell length of all drilled (n = 39–154 per site, total n = 581) and undrilled (n = 271–1238 per site, total n = 5665) mussels in each plot. We measured length as the tip of the beak to the posterior edge using either electronic calipers or, for mussels ≤ 20 mm, from photos using ImageJ software (v. 1.51 s; Abràmoff et al. 2004). Quadrats were nested within plots, so we averaged mussel lengths across quadrats within plots, then averaged plots to get site means and variance. We also measured shell thickness across the whole shell and found that length and thickness were highly colinear (linear regression R2 = 0.871, P < 0.001); therefore, we considered only length in our final analyses. To understand if Nucella are selective predators, we tested if the sizes of drilled mussels were different from the sizes of available mussels (which includes drilled and undrilled) by performing Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests of the respective distributions at each site.
To compare dogwhelk sizes among sites, we collected 25–68 Nucella at each site from in and around our plots. We measured length with calipers as the distance from the shell apex to the tip of the siphonal canal and calculated mean and variance for the whole site. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise t tests to examine variation in Nucella length and drilled and available mussel lengths across the eight study locations, transforming data when necessary to meet model assumptions of normality.
Mitochondrial haplotype diversity and IBD
From our previously collected Nucella, we took a foot tissue sample from each specimen and preserved it in 95% EtOH. We collected additional specimens in 2017 from Fogarty Creek, Strawberry Hill and Bodega to increase sample size (final n = 20–39). To compare genetic differences among populations, we sequenced a region of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) which is widely used in mollusk studies to distinguish both between closely related species and among populations within species (Marko 1998, 2004; Hebert et al. 2003; Marko et al. 2014; Dawson et al. 2014). We extracted DNA using a Thermo Scientific GeneJET Genomic DNA purification kit (ThermoFisher Scientific), following instructions for mammalian tissue genomic DNA purification. To amplify the COI gene, we used primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994) or the modified versions jgLCO1490 and jgHCO2198 (Geller et al. 2013). We prepared polymerase chain reactions (PCR) with 1.5–3 µL genomic DNA, 11.08 µL GoTaq Green master mix (Promega), 1.46 µL of each primer stock solution (20–100 µM; Sigma-Aldrich), and 2 µL BSA. PCR conditions were 94 °C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 48 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min. We visualized PCR products on 2% agarose gels before purification and sequencing at the UC Berkeley DNA Sequencing Facility (Berkeley, USA). We edited chromatograms of sequences in CLC Bio Workbench v. 7.9.1 (CLC Bio A/S, Aarhus, Denmark) and cropped and aligned them using MEGA v. 7.0.26 (Kumar et al. 2016). We calculated haplotype frequencies in the R package pegas (v. 0.10; Paradis 2010). To quantify genetic relatedness between populations, we calculated Kimura-2-parameter distance (K2P) within and between all sites using Arlequin v. 3.5.2.2 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). We tested for isolation by distance (IBD) by plotting pairwise K2P distance against coastline distance estimated from Google Earth Pro v. 7.3.1.4507 and used linear regression to test for a significant correlation.
Contributions of environment and genetic relatedness
To determine the contributions of the environment and genetic relatedness to drilling selectivity, we used two approaches: multiple regression and stepwise model selection (environmental data) and Mantel tests (genetic data). We used two approaches because the response variable and most predictor variables are measured values, but the genetic data were a distance matrix that cannot be used in multiple regression analyses. First, we used multiple regression to fit environmental models of the mean length of drilled mussels using the lm() function in package stats in R (R Core Team 2017). The total sample size was 24, as one site (Lompoc) did not have environmental data available. For predictors, we used principal component axes one through three (PC1–PC3) from the environmental data as well as mean Nucella length, mean available mussel length, and the density of drilled mussels as a proxy for Nucella density. Predictor variables were noncolinear and independent, meeting model assumptions (VIF < 6, Zuur et al. 2007). Assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were checked visually using Q–Q and residuals versus fitted plots and no assumptions were violated. We performed forward and backward stepwise model selection using the step() function in package stats and compared models using the Akaike Information Criteria corrected for small sample sizes (AICc) to determine which model best explained drilled mussel length (aictab() function in package AICcmodavg; Mazerolle 2019; Table S3). We selected the model with the lowest AICc score that included mussel length available since this was an important a priori biological predictor. We then incorporated random effects and correlations among quadrats with a compound symmetry correlation structure using the lme() function in package nlme (Pinheiro et al. 2019). Our final model included PC1, PC3, mean mussel length available and mean Nucella length as fixed effects and site as a random effect. We calculated effect sizes using the coefficients of linear regressions on mean drilled mussel length residuals and each predictor variable.
To test for correlations between genetic distance and drilled mussel length while taking into account covariates, our second approach was to convert all non-matrix data into separate Euclidean distance matrices using the dist() function in package vegan (Oksanen et al. 2018). First, we used a Mantel test to test for an effect of genetic distance on drilled mussel length (function mantel() in package vegan). Next, we used partial Mantel tests to evaluate the correlation between genetic distance and drilled mussel length while controlling for significant model terms individually (function mantel.partial() in package vegan). Lastly, we used partial Mantel tests to evaluate the correlation between each significant model term and drilled mussel length while controlling for genetic relatedness. It is important to note the interpretation of these analyses differs from those of the multiple regression as all variables are distance matrices, not raw measured values. We performed all analyses in R v. 3.3.1 (R Core Team 2017) and plots were made with package ggplot2 (Wickham 2016).
Results
Characterization of environmental variables
Principal component axis one (PC1) explained 59.49% of the variability in the environmental variables and showed differences in pH and temperature regimes among the sites, roughly reflected in latitude. Sites with low median emersion and water temperatures also had high values for standard deviation in pH, standard deviation in water temperature, and frequency of low pH events, conditions that especially characterized the northern three sites (Fig. S1; Table S2). On the other end of this environmental axis were sites with high median emersion and water temperatures, high frequencies of very warm emersion and water temperatures, and high mean pH, most notably Hopkins, which is in the Monterey Bay, CA.
Positive values on the second PC axis (PC2) represented high standard deviation of emersion temperatures and stable pH (i.e., high minimum, low maximum, low frequency below 7.6) and this axis explained 22.36% of the total environmental variation among sites. One of the central sites (Van Damme) had the highest value on this axis, showing it had the most variable emersion temperatures but a relatively stable pH regime. For the third PC axis (PC3), accounting for 10.78% of the total variation, positive values represented higher frequency of pH dropping below 7.6, and negative values represented high frequency of pH below 8.0, high standard deviation of water temperature and high maximum water and emersion temperatures.
Drilling selectivity
Distributions of drilled and available mussels differed significantly at all sites, indicating that Nucella were selective for mussel size. Nearly all sites had larger mean drilled mussels than the mean available (mean selectivity [mean drilled − mean available] across sites: 14.02 ± 9.51 mm, mean ± SD; Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests, D = 0.24–0.64, P < 0.001; Fig. S4), except Strawberry Hill where the drilled mussels were on average smaller (mean selectivity: − 7.48 ± 14.28; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, D = 0.312, P < 0.001). Mean Nucella shell length, mean available mussel length, and mean drilled mussel length all varied significantly among sites (Fig. 2). Larger Nucella occurred at the southern three sites (ANOVA, F7,315 = 55.04, P < 0.001; Fig. 2a). Mean available mussel length varied from about 1.5 to 5 cm (ANOVA, F7,19 = 5.78, P = 0.001; Fig. 2b), and drilled mussel length from 1 cm to almost 6 cm, with smallest drilled mussels at the northern two sites (ANOVA, F7,19 = 20.12, P < 0.001; Fig. 2c).
Mitochondrial haplotype diversity and IBD
We generated a haplotype network using 135 COI sequences of 599 bp (n = 7–25 per site; Fig. S5; GenBank accession numbers MK258758–MK258868 and MK265353–MK265375). There were fixed differences in COI among most Nucella populations, and only the northern three populations shared a substantial number of haplotypes, suggesting that populations in the south are more isolated. In the south, Hopkins did not share haplotypes with the two other southern locations (Soberanes and Lompoc) and none of the northern sites shared any haplotypes with the southern sites. Estimates of K2P (Table S4) indicate these northern populations are less divergent from each other than populations in the south. A pattern of isolation by distance was not supported, suggesting isolation on a very localized scale (R2 = 0.017, P = 0.24; Fig. S6).
Contributions of environment and genetic relatedness
In the multiple regression of environmental variables on mean drilled mussel length, the two best models (lowest AICcs, less than 2 units apart) for mean drilled mussel length showed 91% of the cumulative weighting in the set of competing models and included the significant predictor terms Nucella length, PC1, and PC3 (P < 0.02), plus the nonsignificant term mean available mussel length (Table 1; Table S3). We used these four terms as fixed effects while accounting for correlations among replicate quadrats and site as random in our final linear mixed effects model. PC3, representing more stable water temperature and pH, was significantly positively related to mean drilled mussel length (P = 0.045; Fig. 3a). PC1, representing greater and more stable temperatures and pH, was also positively related to drilled mussel length, though it was marginally insignificant (P = 0.052; Fig. 3b). Mean available mussel length and mean Nucella length were not significantly related to mean drilled mussel length (Table 1). A one-unit increase in PC3 had about twice the effect on mean drilled mussel length as PC1 (7.0 vs. 3.6), with total effect sizes of 27.12 and 20.25 mm, respectively. The random effect of site explained 71.05% of the residual variance. After subtracting potential mussel growth over 8 months, these results were qualitatively unchanged (Tables S5 and S6).
Genetic distance was not significantly correlated with the matrix of mean drilled mussel length, even when controlling for significant model terms using a partial Mantel test. PC1 and PC3 were significantly correlated with drilled mussel length after controlling for genetic distance (Table 2).
Discussion
Intraspecific trait variation, including phenotypic variation among populations, can have important effects on species interactions that shape communities and ecosystems (Palkovacs and Post 2009; Harmon et al. 2009; Palkovacs et al. 2009; Bolnick et al. 2011; Ingram et al. 2012; Royauté and Pruitt 2015; Fryxell and Palkovacs 2017; Des Roches et al. 2018). Our study explored the drivers of trait variation among populations of a predator that preys on a foundation species. Our goal was to determine how environmental variation and neutral genetic relatedness contribute to variation among populations in Nucella selectivity of Mytilus californianus prey. We found significant trait variation among populations of Nucella is largely related to temperature and pH and not significantly related to neutral genetic relatedness. Specifically, we found that Nucella select larger mussels at sites characterized by greater and more stable temperatures and pH. These results provide evidence that Nucella predation can be altered by climate change, which is reducing seawater pH, increasing temperature, and lengthening the duration of upwelling in the California Current System (Gruber et al. 2012; Hauri et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2015; Turi et al. 2016; Xiu et al. 2018). As changes occur, environmental conditions interacting at different scales will influence the size selectivity of Nucella with the potential to change the structure of the mussel bed and associated community.
We found fixed genetic differences in COI haplotypes among populations, but these differences were not correlated with variation in prey selectivity, even after accounting for important environmental variables, indicating that prey size selectivity is not related to neutral genetic distance. Marko (1998) and Dawson et al. (2014) found similarly low COI differentiation among many of these populations. While Palmer et al. (1990) reported two species in this range, the very low COI differentiation we found among populations does not clearly indicate separate species. Since environmental predictors remained important after controlling for genetic relationships, climate effects on Nucella feeding ecology appear relatively unconstrained by phylogeny. This result has important implications for how populations will respond to rapid changes in coastal climate.
Abiotic and biotic stressors may make predation risky for Nucella as the dogwhelk is immobilized and vulnerable for several days during handling (drilling) of their prey. The larger the mussel, the longer the handling time, and the longer the dogwhelk is exposed to these stressors (Hughes and de Dunkin 1984). Temperature and pH are two important stressors that alter Nucella foraging behavior and can influence size selectivity via risk of prolonged handling. Acidified seawater increases handling time (Queirós et al. 2015; Cerny-Chipman 2016) and causes shell dissolution in Nucella (Nienhuis et al. 2010), so dogwhelks exposed to low pH face a tradeoff between foraging and hiding from their own predators. This tradeoff could lead dogwhelks in lower pH to choose smaller mussels with shorter handling times. Temperature has more complex effects on Nucella foraging. Warm emersion temperatures have negative effects on Nucella predation rate, while warm water has strong positive effects and can mitigate the negative effects of warming during emersion (Yamane and Gilman 2009; King and Sebens 2018). Nucella may have been able to drill larger mussels at the sites with warm water despite the associated warm emersion temperatures due to the overwhelmingly positive effects of water temperature on predation rate and growth. Finally, wave exposure, which we did not measure, can affect foraging (Burrows and Hughes 1991), and is often correlated with temperature (higher wave exposure, lower temperature; Harley and Helmuth 2003; Blanchette et al. 2007). Therefore, cold temperature could be confounded with high wave stress as a driver of prey selectivity, leading dogwhelks to drill smaller mussels to reduce handling time and the associated risk of dislodgement by waves.
Environmental variability was the most important factor explaining mussel size selectivity. Nucella drilled larger mussels—with longer handling times—at sites with greater PC3 values, representing more stable water temperature and pH conditions. It is possible that the risk of repeated exposure to stressful abiotic events while handling a large mussel was lower at the more stable sites. Marine organisms initiating thermal stress repair (e.g., heat shock protein expression) may take days to return to baseline levels, and many repeated stressful events can add up and increase recovery time (Gunderson et al. 2016); therefore, sites characterized by high abiotic variability could put Nucella in a prolonged stress response. During handling, Nucella cannot seek refuge from these stressful events, so more stable conditions may allow them the option of consuming larger prey with longer handling times.
Temperature and pH are important components of climate that are changing worldwide due to recent climate change. Global climate models predict sea surface temperatures to rise, pH to decrease, and upwelling intensity and duration in the California Current System to increase in the coming decades (Bakun et al. 2015; Turi et al. 2016; Xiu et al. 2018). In our study, warmer temperatures and low pH were oppositely correlated with the size of mussels drilled, suggesting that the effects of climate change on the Nucella–Mytilus interaction will depend on which stressor has the stronger effect in a given local environment. For example, Nucella predation in areas with strong and persistent upwelling, such as sites between Cape Blanco and Point Conception, may be more affected by decreases in pH since upwelling primarily brings low pH, cold water to the coast. This trend would reduce the size of mussels Nucella select, weakening their effect on mussel bed structure. One possible mechanism for selecting smaller prey in low pH is increased handling time if the energetic reward for consuming large mussels ceases to exceed the energy required to drill them (Queirós et al. 2015; Cerny-Chipman 2016). In contrast, Nucella at sites outside the region of strong upwelling may be more affected by warming temperatures, leading to increased selection of larger mussels by reducing handling time (Miller 2013), strengthening Nucella’s effect on mussel bed structure. However, pH and temperature also affect mussel traits like size and shell thickness (Kroeker et al. 2014a; Sadler et al. 2018), so net changes in the Nucella–Mytilus interaction ultimately depend on the responses of both predator and prey to changing climate (Kroeker et al. 2014b).
Our study suggests that variation among populations in predator foraging patterns in intertidal zones is more related to climate conditions than neutral genetic relatedness, showing the importance of environmental conditions in driving trait variation among populations of marine organisms. As ocean conditions continue to change, populations of marine organisms will face increasingly stressful abiotic conditions that vary based on the interactions between global, regional, and local climate dynamics. As each population faces unique conditions, organisms will respond by changing behavioral, morphological, or physiological traits, which can change species interactions and community dynamics. Increasingly, predictions of biodiversity will depend not only on effects of climate on species persistence but also on population-specific changes in ecologically important traits.
References
Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int 11:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3589100
Bakun A, Black BA, Bograd SJ et al (2015) Anticipated effects of climate change on coastal upwelling ecosystems. Curr Clim Change Rep 1:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0008-4
Bayne BL, Scullard C (1978) Rates of feeding by Thais (Nucella) Lapillus (L.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 32:113–129
Behrens Yamada S, Dunham JB (1989) Mytilus californianus, a new aquaculture species? Aquaculture 81:275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90152-X
Blanchette CA, Helmuth B, Gaines SD (2007) Spatial patterns of growth in the mussel, Mytilus californianus, across a major oceanographic and biogeographic boundary at Point Conception, California, USA. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 340:126–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.09.022
Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS et al (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 26:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009
Burrows MT, Hughes RN (1989) Natural foraging of the dogwhelk, Nucella lapillus (Linnaeus); the weather and whether to feed. J Molluscan Stud 55:285–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/55.2.285
Burrows MT, Hughes RN (1991) Optimal foraging decisions by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.): influences of mortality risk and rate-constrained digestion. Funct Ecol 5:461–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389628
Cerny-Chipman EB (2016) Changing climate, changing contexts: variation in rocky intertidal predator–prey interactions seen through an environmental stress framework. PhD dissertation, Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis
Chan F, Barth JA, Blanchette CA et al (2017) Persistent spatial structuring of coastal ocean acidification in the California Current System. Sci Rep 7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02777-y
Clelland ES, Saleuddin ASM (2000) Vacuolar-type ATPase in the accessory boring organ of Nucella lamellosa (Gmelin) (Mollusca: Gastropoda): role in shell penetration. Biol Bull 198:272–283
Connell JH (1961) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42:710–723
Dawson MN, Hays CG, Grosberg RK, Raimondi PT (2014) Dispersal potential and population genetic structure in the marine intertidal of the eastern North Pacific. Ecol Monogr 84:435–456. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0871.1
de la Haye KL, Spicer JI, Widdicombe S, Briffa M (2012) Reduced pH sea water disrupts chemo-responsive behaviour in an intertidal crustacean. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 412:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.11.013
Des Roches S, Post DM, Turley NE et al (2018) The ecological importance of intraspecific variation. Nat Ecol Evol 2:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5
Endler JA (1973) Gene flow and population differentiation. Science 179:243–250
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15
Fitzhenry T, Halpin P, Helmuth B (2004) Testing the effects of wave exposure, site, and behavior on intertidal mussel body temperatures: applications and limits of temperature logger design. Mar Biol 145:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1318-6
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W et al (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013102
Fryxell DC, Palkovacs EP (2017) Warming strengthens the ecological role of intraspecific variation in a predator. Copeia 105:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-16-527
Geller J, Meyer C, Parker M, Hawk H (2013) Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Mol Ecol Resour 13:851–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12138
Gruber N, Hauri C, Lachkar Z et al (2012) Rapid progression of ocean acidification in the California Current System. Science 337:220–223. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216773
Gunderson AR, Armstrong EJ, Stillman JH (2016) Multiple stressors in a changing world: the need for an improved perspective on physiological responses to the dynamic marine environment. Ann Rev Mar Sci 8:357–378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033953
Harley CDG, Helmuth BST (2003) Local- and regional-scale effects of wave exposure, thermal stress, and absolute versus effective shore level on patterns of intertidal zonation. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1498–1508. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.4.1498
Harmon LJ, Matthews B, Des Roches S et al (2009) Evolutionary diversification in stickleback affects ecosystem functioning. Nature 458:1167–1170. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07974
Hauri C, Gruber N, Vogt M et al (2013) Spatiotemporal variability and long-term trends of ocean acidification in the California Current System. Biogeosciences 10:193–216. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-193-2013
Hayford HA, Gilman SE, Carrington E (2015) Foraging behavior minimizes heat exposure in a complex thermal landscape. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 518:165–175. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11053
Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, DeWaard JR (2003) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:S96–S99. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025
Helmuth B, Broitman BR, Blanchette CA et al (2006) Mosaic patterns of thermal stress in the rocky intertidal zone: implications for climate change. Ecol Monogr 76:461–479. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076%5b0461:MPOTSI%5d2.0.CO;2
Helmuth B, Choi F, Matzelle A et al (2016) Data from: long-term, high frequency in situ measurements of intertidal mussel bed temperatures using biomimetic sensors. Sci Data 3:160087. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6n8kf
Hendry AP, Day T, Taylor EB (2001) Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical traits. Evolution 55:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00780.x
Hofmann GE, Evans TG, Kelly MW et al (2014) Exploring local adaptation and the ocean acidification seascape—studies in the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem. Biogeosciences 11:1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1053-2014
Hughes RN, de Dunkin SB (1984) Behavioural components of prey selection by dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.), feeding on mussels, Mytilus edulis (L.), in the laboratory. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 77:45–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90050-9
Ingram T, Kraft NJB, Kratina P et al (2012) Intraguild predation drives evoutionary niche shift in threespine stickleback. Evolution 66:1819–1832. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.sj3v479j
Kanter RG (1977) Structure and Diversity in Mytilus californianus (Mollusca: Bivalvia) Communities. PhD dissertation, Department of Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x
King W, Sebens KP (2018) Non-additive effects of air and water warming on an intertidal predator–prey interaction. Mar Biol 165:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3320-4
Kroeker KJ, Gaylord B, Hill TM et al (2014a) The role of temperature in determining species’ vulnerability to ocean acidification: a case study using Mytilus galloprovincialis. PLoS One 9:7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100353
Kroeker KJ, Sanford E, Jellison BM, Gaylord B (2014b) Predicting the effects of ocean acidification on predator–prey interactions: a conceptual framework based on coastal molluscs. Biol Bull 226:211–222
Kroeker KJ, Sanford E, Rose JM et al (2016) Interacting environmental mosaics drive geographic variation in mussel performance and predation vulnerability. Ecol Lett 19:771–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12613
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Lafferty KD, Suchanek TH (2016) Revisiting Paine’s 1966 sea star removal experiment, the most-cited empirical article in the American Naturalist. Am Nat 188:365–378. https://doi.org/10.1086/688045
Largen MJ (1967) The influence of water temperature upon the life of the dogwhelk Thais lapillus (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). J Anim Ecol 36:207–214
Lenormand T (2002) Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 17:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02497-7
Marko PB (1998) Historical allopatry and the biogeography of speciation in the prosobranch snail genus Nucella. Evolution 52:757–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03700.x
Marko PB (2004) ‘What’s larvae got to do with it?’ Disparate patterns of post-glacial population structure in two benthic marine gastropods with identical dispersal potential. Mol Ecol 13:597–611. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2004.02096.x
Marko PB (2005) An intraspecific comparative analysis of character divergence between sympatric species. Evolution 59:554–564. https://doi.org/10.1554/04-205
Marko PB, Moran AL, Kolotuchina NK, Zaslavskaya NI (2014) Phylogenetics of the gastropod genus Nucella (Neogastropoda: Muricidae): species identities, timing of diversification and correlated patterns of life-history evolution. J Molluscan Stud. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyu024
Mazerolle MJ (2019) AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.2-2. https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg. Accessed 5 Apr 2019
Menge BA, Berlow EL, Blanchette CA et al (1994) The keystone species concept: variation in interaction strength in a rocky intertidal habitat. Ecol Monogr 64:249–286
Menge BA, Blanchette CA, Raimondi P et al (2004) Species interaction strength: testing model predictions along an upwelling gradient. Ecol Monogr 74:663–684
Menge B, Chan F, Russell A et al (2015) Moorings temperature and pH from multiple sites in the California Current System starting 2008 (OMEGAS-MaS project, ACIDIC project)
Miller LP (2013) The effect of water temperature on drilling and ingestion rates of the dogwhelk Nucella lapillus feeding on Mytilus edulis mussels in the laboratory. Mar Biol 160:1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2202-z
Morris RH, Abbot DP, Haderlie EC (1980) Prosobranchia: marine snails. In: Intertidal invertebrates of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, p 282
Navarrete SA (1994) Effects of interactions between predators, variable predation regimes, and species body size on rocky intertidal communities: comparative and experimental approaches. PhD dissertation, Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis
Navarrete SA (1996) Variable predation: effects of whelks on a mid-intertidal successional community. Ecol Monogr 66:301–321
Navarrete SA, Menge BA (1996) Keystone predation and interaction strength: interactive effects of predators on their main prey. Ecol Monogr 66:409–429
Nienhuis S, Palmer AR, Harley CDG (2010) Elevated CO2 affects shell dissolution rate but not calcification rate in a marine snail. Proc Biol Sci 277:2553–2558. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0206
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al (2018) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 6 Mar 2019
Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75
Palkovacs EP, Post DM (2009) Experimental evidence that phenotypic divergence in predators drives community divergence in prey. Ecology 90:300–305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0016
Palkovacs EP, Marshall MC, Lamphere BA et al (2009) Experimental evaluation of evolution and coevolution as agents of ecosystem change in Trinidadian streams. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:1617–1628. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0016
Palmer AR, Gayron SD, Woodruff DS (1990) Reproductive, morphological, and genetic evidence for two cryptic species of Northeastern Pacific Nucella. Veliger 33:325–338
Paradis E (2010) pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics 26:419–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp696
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S et al (2019) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-141. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Pistevos JCA, Nagelkerken I, Rossi T et al (2015) Ocean acidification and global warming impair shark hunting behaviour and growth. Sci Rep 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16293
Post DM, Palkovacs EP, Schielke EG, Dodson SI (2008) Intraspecific variation in a predator affects community structure and cascading trophic interactions. Ecology 89:2019–2032
Queirós AM, Fernandes JA, Faulwetter S et al (2015) Scaling up experimental ocean acidification and warming research: from individuals to the ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 21:130–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12675
R Core Team (2017) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 10 Feb 2017
Royauté R, Pruitt JN (2015) Varying predator personalities generates contrasting prey communities in an agroecosystem. Ecology 96:2902–2911. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2424.1
Sadler DE, Lemasson AJ, Knights AM (2018) The effects of elevated CO2 on shell properties and susceptibility to predation in mussels Mytilus edulis. Mar Environ Res 139:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.05.017
Sanford E (2002) The feeding, growth, and energetics of two rocky intertidal predators (Pisaster ochraceus and Nucella canaliculata) under water temperatures simulating episodic upwelling. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 273:199–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00164-8
Sanford E, Kelly MW (2011) Local adaptation in marine invertebrates. Ann Rev Mar Sci 3:509–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142756
Sanford E, Worth DJ (2009) Genetic differences among populations of a marine snail drive geographic variation in predation. Ecology 90:3108–3118
Sanford E, Worth DJ (2010) Local adaptation along a continuous coastline: prey recruitment drives differentiation in a predatory snail. Ecology 91:891–901
Sanford E, Roth MS, Johns GC et al (2003) Local selection and latitudinal variation in a marine predator–prey interaction. Science 300:1135–1137. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083437
Strathmann MF (1987) Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific coast: data and methods for the study of eggs, embryos, and larvae. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Suchanek TH (1978a) The ecology of Mytilus edulis L. in exposed rocky intertidal communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 31:105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(78)90139-9
Suchanek TH (1978b) The Mytilus californianus community: studies on the composition, structure, organization, and dynamics of a mussel bed. PhD dissertation, Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle
Suchanek TH (1986) The ecology of rocky coasts. Columbia University Press, New York
Suchanek TH (1992) Extreme biodiversity in the marine environment: mussel bed communities of Mytilus Californianus. Northwest Environ J 8:150–152
Thorpe RS (1996) The use of DNA divergence to help determine the correlates of evolution of morphological characters. Evolution 50:524–531
Turi G, Gruber N, Munnich M (2016) Climatic modulation of recent trends in ocean acidification in the California Current System. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014007
Wang D, Gouhier TC, Menge BA, Ganguly AR (2015) Intensification and spatial homogenization of coastal upwelling under climate change. Nature 518:390–394. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14235
Watson SA, Fields JB, Munday PL (2017) Ocean acidification alters predator behaviour and reduces predation rate. Biol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0797
West L (1986) Interindividual variation in prey selection by the snail Nucella (= Thais) emarginata. Ecology 67:798–809
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York
Xiu P, Chai F, Curchitser EN, Castruccio FS (2018) Future changes in coastal upwelling ecosystems with global warming: the case of the California Current System. Sci Rep 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21247-7
Yamane L, Gilman SE (2009) Opposite responses by an intertidal predator to increasing aquatic and aerial temperatures. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 393:27–36. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08276
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Smith GM (2007) Analysing ecological data. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Raimondi for providing expert knowledge on the study system, intellectual contributions, and assistance with statistical analyses. We thank K. Kroeker, G. Somero, S. Des Roches, and anonymous reviewers for feedback that improved the manuscript. We thank G. Bernardi for lab space and supplies for molecular analyses. We acknowledge data and support from the Partnership for the Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans (PISCO): a long-term ecological consortium funded by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. We appreciate the cooperation of California State Parks, Oregon State Parks, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Bodega Marine Lab, Hopkins Marine Station, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (SCP #13169), and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (STP #19330) for permits and permission to access and collect from field sites. Finally, we thank numerous field and lab volunteers including R. Irigoyen, T. Huynh, A. Zyszczynski, C. Pickering, E. Patel, N. Egan, S. Traverso, X. Clare, and Palkovacs and Raimondi lab members including D. Fryxell and M. Moritsch. This research was supported by the Dr. Earl H. Myers and Ethel M. Myers Oceanographic and Marine Biology Trust, the Friends of the Long Marine Lab, the Science Internship Program, the American Malacological Society, the American Fisheries Society, the UCSC Future Leaders in Coastal Science grant, the UCSC Graduate Student Association, and the UCSC Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. GMC received support from the US Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need GAANN P200A150100-17 awarded by the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department at the University of California, Santa Cruz. KJR received support by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DEB 1556378). EPP received support from the NOAA Cooperative Institute for Marine Ecosystems and Climate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GMC and EPP conceived and designed the study. GMC performed the fieldwork, lab work, and analyzed the data. KR directed genetic analyses and wrote genetic methods, results, and conclusions. GMC wrote the manuscript other authors critically evaluated the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Peter S. Petraitis.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Contolini, G.M., Reid, K. & Palkovacs, E.P. Climate shapes population variation in dogwhelk predation on foundational mussels. Oecologia 192, 553–564 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04591-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04591-x