Abstract
Encephalitozoon cuniculi is an obligatory intracellular microsporidian parasite that can infect a wide range of mammals, including rodents, rabbits, horses, carnivores and humans, in which the organism is known as an opportunistic pathogen of immunocompromised individuals. Nevertheless, the main host for E. cuniculi is the rabbit and infections usually have a sub-clinical course. However, severe disease is recognised in pet rabbits more frequently within the last years. As the central nervous system, the kidney and the eye are predilection organs for the organism, predominant histopathological alterations comprise granulomatous meningoencephalitis, chronical interstitial nephritis and phacoclastic uveitis. A definitive diagnosis of encephalitozoonosis in vivo is difficult, but it is important for specific treatment and the determination of possible zoonotic risks. This review article covers epidemiology, pathology, pathophysiology, immunology, clinical signs, differential diagnosis, diagnosis and treatment of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Encephalitozoonosis was first reported in laboratory rabbits with paralysis by Wright and Craighead (1922). Since that time, many studies have been performed on Encephalitozoon cuniculi infections in rabbits as well as humans, where the organism is known to cause opportunistic infections in patients with HIV infections. In laboratory rabbits, encephalitozoonoses used to be a frequent problem, affecting the health status of the animals and interfering with experiments (Petri 1969; Shadduck and Pakes 1971). Therefore, as a part of regular health monitoring of rabbits that are used in research, animals are routinely tested by serological methods for antibodies to E. cunculi before they are used for laboratory procedures.
In veterinary practice, encephalitozoonosis is a common cause of neurological disease in pet rabbits. However, a definitive diagnosis in the living rabbit is difficult and treatment protocols for the disease are still nonuniform, since only few controlled studies have been performed to asses therapy options for the use in diseased animals (Neuschl et al. 1999; Suter et al. 2001).
This study gives an overview on studies that have been performed referring to encephalitozoonosis in rabbits with a special focus on clinical signs, diagnosis and treatment options.
General features of E. cuniculi and the microsporidia
Encephalitozoonosis is a common infectious disease in rabbits. Its causative agent, E. cuniculi, an obligately intracellular parasite, is a member of the microsporidia (Wasson and Peper 2000). Within the genus Encephalitozoon, two other species, Encephalitozoon hellem and Encephalitozoon intestinalis, are also known to infect mammals (Wasson and Peper 2000; Mathis et al. 2005).
Although microsporidia are eukaryotic organisms, they show some atypical characteristics; even though they lack mitochondria, enzymes with mitochondrial functions have been detected (Katinka et al. 2001). Their Golgi apparatus is atypical (Weber et al. 1996; Méteniér and Vivarès 2001) and the ribosomal RNA resembles that of pro- rather than eukaryotes (Müller 1998). Based on biochemical and molecular analyses, they are currently thought to be more closely related to fungi than to protozoa (Mathis 2000; Méteniér and Vivarès 2001).
Microsporidia are unusual organisms in many respects. They form unicellular spores as environmental stages which infect cells via a unique invasion apparatus, comprising a polar tube which discharges the sporoplasm into the new host cell after activation (Franzen 2004; Xu and Weiss 2005). After asexual multiplication (merogony) spores develop within the host cell (sporogony) and, in the case of Encephalitozoon, inside a parasitophorous vacuole which separates the parasite from the host cell plasma and mostly consists of host cell-derived lipids (Franzen 2004; Rönnebäumer et al. 2008). When the cell is destroyed, spores can be released into the environment. These spores, which are 1–10 µm depending on the species, consist of a polar tube coiled around the sporoblast which contains the nucleus, the posterior vacuole and the ribosomes, and which is surrounded by a plasma membrane. For environmental resistance, these structures are enclosed in an endo- and an exospore (Franzen 2004; Xu and Weiss 2005).
Another unique feature of the microsporidia is their extremely small genome, which only comprises 2.9 Mbp for E. cuniculi (Biderre et al. 1995; Katinka et al. 2001). The reduction in genome size is due to tight packing of the genetic information within the chromosomes (with virtual absence of introns, a low number of repetitive sequences and many single-copy genes), a shortening of genes as well as of non-coding sequences and a loss of genetic information regarding certain metabolic pathways that seem to have become irrelevant for the parasitic life style of the microsporidia (Mathis 2000; Katinka et al. 2001).
Epidemiology and host spectrum
The main host for E. cuniculi is the rabbit, and seroprevalence rates are usually high in pet rabbit populations with 37% to 68% of the population (Ewringmann and Göbel 1999; Harcourt-Brown and Holloway 2003; Ebrecht and Müller 2004). In wild rabbit populations, the parasite is less prevalent, probably due to the lower animal density (Wilson, 1979; Cox and Ross 1980; Chalupsky et al. 1990). In experimental animal breeding facilities, the parasite used to be prevalent but with good hygiene standards, and health surveys infections can be controlled (Mathis et al. 2005; Künzel et al. 2008).
E. cuniculi is capable of infecting other mammalian hosts including rodents, horses, carnivores, non-human primates and humans (reviewed by Canning and Lom 1986; Mathis et al. 2005). Three different strains (I = “rabbit”, II = “mouse”, III = “dog”) have been determined according to the number of short repeats in the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (Didier et al. 1995a, b). While the geographic distribution of these strains has not been investigated systematically, rabbits have so far only been reported to be infected with the “rabbit” strain under natural conditions, although they are susceptible to the other two strains as well (Mathis 2000; Mathis et al. 2005). Confirmed human cases (only “dog” and “rabbit” strains) have been reported since 1994; earlier, species determination was not done in cases of human microsporidial infections. All cases of confirmed infections were described in immunocompromised patients, mostly HIV-positive cases (Mathis et al. 2005), ranking encephalitozoonosis among the rare opportunistic diseases.
Infected rabbits excrete the small spores of E. cuniculi (approximately 1.5 × 2.5 µm; Wasson and Peper 2000) intermittently, and the infection is transmitted horizontally by direct contact or environmental contamination (Harcourt-Brown 2004; Mathis et al. 2005). Once ingested, the parasite reaches the internal organs via the blood flow and is disseminated into the kidneys, liver, lungs and heart, with kidneys and (subsequently) brain being predilection sites (Cox et al. 1979). During intrauterine transmission E. cuniculi spores can also be trapped in the anterior lens capsule (Wolfer et al. 1993). Although intrauterine transmission has been demonstrated by Baneux and Pognan (2003), this route of infection only seems to play a role for the intraocular development of the parasite (Scharmann et al. 1986; Wolfer et al. 1993).
In experimental studies, intravenous, intraperitoneal, intracerebral and intrarectal infections could also be established (Cox et al. 1979; Shadduck et al. 1979; Wicher et al. 1991; Horváth et al. 1998). Spores are subsequently excreted by the urine for several weeks (Cox and Gallichio 1978; Scharmann et al. 1986).
Pathology and pathophysiology
E. cuniculi infection in rabbits usually follow a chronic course, taking weeks to months to develop a significant parasite burden which may or may not lead to clinical symptoms. First tissue alterations are known to be present in the kidney, liver and lung while the brain is not affected at the beginning, but after about 3 months, the most significant alterations are seen in the kidneys and the brain. At that time, lesions wane in lung and liver, and parasites are usually absent form these organs. The heart can also be involved, although usually to a minor extent (Cox et al. 1979).
Cerebral tissue alterations demonstrate perivascular infiltrations ranging from discrete changes to non-suppurative, focal or multifocal granulomatous (meningo-) encephalitis (Cox and Gallichio 1978; Wicher et al. 1991; Eröksüz et al. 1999; Csokai et al. 2009a). Granulomas contain lymphocytes, plasma cells and glia cells and are often necrotic in the centre (Eröksüz et al. 1999; Harcourt-Brown 2002). The most frequently affected area is the cerebrum (cortex and medulla), but inflammatory lesions can also be found in the brain stem and the spinal cord, to a lesser extent in the cerebellum. The leptomeninges are almost always affected (Scharmann et al. 1986; Csokai et al. 2009a). Occasionally, focal spinal radiculitis is observed (Nast et al. 1996), which might be responsible for atypical neurological symptoms. In a survey on 71 naturally infected rabbits, the vestibular cores were only affected in 37.5% of the cases (Csokai et al. 2009a).
Lesions in renal tissue include focal granulomatous nephritis, primarily with mononuclear cells. Severe grades of chronic interstitial nephritis with macroscopic scar tissue formation due to fibrosis, and multifocal granulomas are frequently documented (Flatt and Jackson, 1970; Cox and Gallichio 1978; Eröksüz et al. 1999; Csokai et al. 2009a). Spores multiply in the tubular epithelium; from there, they are excreted by the urine. As infection proceeds spore detection in the tissue becomes less frequent (Flatt and Jackson, 1970; Csokai et al. 2009a). Phacoclastic uveitis, the consequence of intrauterine infection, is characterised by the infiltration of the eye lens by various inflammatory cells (granulocytes, macrophages, giant cells) leading to a rupture of the lens capsule. Iris and ciliary body are infiltrated by plasma cells and lymphocytes. Parasites are only found in the lens (Giordano et al. 2005).
Inflammations in other organs are rare during the chronic stage of infection. Their affection seems to vary with the route of experimental infection (Von Kücken et al. 1987; Wicher et al. 1991; Nast et al. 1996; Eröksüz et al. 1999) and might be due to a general inflammatory reaction rather than to a specific parasite invasion (Scharmann et al. 1986). Immunosuppression intensifies the development of lesions in experimental-infected animals (Horváth et al. 1998; Levkut et al. 1998).
Immunology
Antibodies against E. cuniculi are produced and persist for long-term periods due to the chronic nature of the infection. However, humoral immune responses do not appear to be protective, in contrast to cellular mechanisms which are essential for the control of the parasite and the survival of the host (Khan et al. 2001). Immunosuppressed (athymic or severe combined immunodeficiency) mice succumb to the infection (Schmidt and Shadduck 1983; Koudela et al. 1993). Especially CD8+ lymphocytes (and possibly γδ-T lymphocytes which regulate them) are important for the host’s survival while CD4+ cells do not seem to play a significant role (Khan and Moretto 1999; Khan et al. 1999). As observed in other intracellular parasitic diseases in mice lack of interferon-γ or interleukin-12 is associated with a high mortality (Khan and Moretto 1999). Immunosuppressive co-infections such as bovine leukaemia virus (Levkut et al. 1998) or treatment with cytostatic drugs (Horváth et al. 1998) can exacerbate the pathology of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits.
Clinical symptoms
As lesions are caused within the central nervous system, kidney or eye, rabbits suffering from encephalitozoonosis may demonstrate neurological symptoms, signs of kidney failure or phacoclastic uveitis. The three forms of this disease can occur individually or in combination. Neurological signs are clearly dominating in clinical manifest E. cuniculi infections. In many cases, the onset of clinical signs is sudden and often follows a stressful event in the rabbit's life (Meyer-Breckwoldt 1996). The most frequently observed neurological sign in rabbits with encephalitozoonosis is vestibular disease (Kunstýř and Naumann 1985; Harcourt-Brown and Holloway 2003; Jass et al. 2008). In addition to head tilt and ataxia, signs of vestibular disease include circling, nystagmus and rotational movements around the body length axis. Usually, the general condition and food intake, even in rabbits with severe head tilt, is not impaired. Rabbits with increased head tilt exhibit rolling clearly more often, occasionally resulting in lateral recumbency with the animal being unable to sit up for a long time. A period of immobilisation following an acute vestibular disorder can limit the recovery of vestibular dysfunction (Thomas 2000).
Other neurological symptoms that are observed in the course of encephalitozoonosis are seizures, paresis, head tremors and swaying or nodding at rest. Occasionally, rabbits also demonstrate behavioural changes (aggression, running or jumping against cage fences, automutilation) and cranial nerve deficits (Ewringmann and Göbel 1999; Harcourt-Brown and Holloway 2003; Jordan et al. 2006).
Phacoclastic uveitis has been reported in many domestic animal species, but the rabbit is relatively unique in that capsule rupture is induced without a prior traumatic insult (Wolfer et al. 1993). The majority of rabbits suffering from phacoclastic uveitis are young individuals (Grahn et al. 1991; Wolfer et al. 1993; Künzel et al. 2008). Ocular signs of encephalitozoonosis commonly occur unilateral, bilateral lesions are only occasionally detected (Ashton et al. 1976; Harcourt-Brown and Holloway 2003). In many cases, rabbit owners report a visible white mass in the eye (Ewringmann and Göbel 1999; Giordano et al. 2005). Besides uveitis, also cataracts of various degrees can be diagnosed within the ophthalmological examination. Usually, physical examination reveals no abnormalities. Normally, concerned rabbits do not show considerable loss of visual function (Fechle and Sigler 2002).
The majority of cases with chronic interstitial nephritis due to an infection with E. cuniculi are sub-clinical. Therefore, azotaemia is commonly detected accidentally in rabbits. Significant renal impairment is rarely observed and concerned rabbits show non-specific signs such as inappetence, weight loss, lethargy and dehydration (Ewringmann and Göbel 1999; Harcourt-Brown and Holloway 2003). Chronic renal failure in rabbits can also cause anaemia or even osteodystrophia resulting in pathologic fractures of the long bones (Ewringmann and Göbel 1999). The evidence of signs of polyuria and polydipsia in rabbits with confirmed azotaemia are controversially discussed in the literature (Dipineto et al. 2008; Künzel et al. 2008).
Differential diagnosis
Besides encephalitozoonosis, otitis media/interna represents the main differential diagnoses for vestibular disorders in rabbits. In the majority of the cases Pasteurella multocida can be isolated from empyema of the tympanic bullae of diseased rabbits and most commonly both ears are affected (Kunstýř and Naumann 1985). In contrast to rabbits with vestibular disease due to an E. cuniculi infection, otitis media/interna is usually associated with signs of upper respiratory infection (sneezing, nasal discharge, stridor) and occasionally pneumonia. While encephalitozoonosis causes central vestibular disease, otitis media/interna typically causes peripheral vestibular disease. However, only in a few cases, a differentiation between central and peripheral vestibular disease can be made based on neurological examination alone. Radiography of the tympanic bullae can help to diagnose otitis media, but changes can be also found accidentally in rabbits with sub-clinical disease (Snyder et al. 1973).
Meningoencephalitis due to bacterial infections is also detected frequently as a cause of neurological disease in rabbits (Murray et al. 1985; Gruber et al. 2009). Infrequently viral infections of the central nervous system (CNS), including herpes simplex virus, Borna disease virus and rabies virus can induce neurological disease in rabbits (Metzler et al. 1978; Weissenböck et al. 1997; Karp 1999; Grest et al. 2002; Müller et al. 2009).
Parasitic infections causing neurological sings in rabbits include cerebral larva migrans of nematodes and toxoplasmosis (Dubey et al. 1992; Furuoka et al. 2003). Baylisascaris infections are not uncommon in rabbits in the USA (Deeb and Di Giacomo 1994). Signs of infection can mimic those of encephalitozoonosis. Typically, an affected rabbit shows intermittent improvement, followed by more severe signs (Deeb and Carpenter 2004). Toxoplasmosis is an uncommon cause of neurological disease in rabbits, and infections are usually sub-clinical. In contrast to encephalitozoonosis, rabbits with clinical toxoplasmosis mostly show unspecific signs such as lethargy, inappetence and fever (Dubey et al. 1992). Toxoplasma gondii may induce granulomatous menigoencephalitis similar to encephalitozoonosis but can be differentiated by serolocical testing, tissue morphology and immunohistochemical labelling (Dubey et al. 1992; Leland et al. 1992). Occasionally, otitis externa due to Psoroptes cuniculi infection is associated with a transient head tilt, but it is obvious that ear mites play no susbstantial role in this condition (Kunstýř and Naumann 1985).
In rabbits, neoplastic lesions, most frequently lymphomas, are also documented to involve the central nervous system (Gruber et al. 2009).
Most often, paresis or paralysis in pet rabbits is caused by traumatic insults resulting in fractures or (sub)luxations of the spinal cord. Head trauma is probably not common, but traumatic episodes such as a head blow or fall can cause brain damage followed by neurological disease.
Cardiovascular lesions, metabolic–toxic causes and degenerative lesions of the CNS should be considered as differential diagnosis to neurological disorders in rabbits as well (Gruber et al. 2009).
Apart from encephalitozoonosis, nephrolithiasis represents the main differential diagnoses for renal failure in rabbits. The condition can be detected by radiographic or ultrasonsographic examination and, therefore, easily differentiated from azotemia caused by an E. cuniculi infection (Harcourt-Brown 2002).
The most important differential diagnoses for phacoclastic uveitis in rabbits is bacterial uveitis, usually caused by P. multocida infection due to haematogenous spread (Williams 1999). Uveitis can be also secondary to severe keratitis or caused by trauma or penetrating foreign bodies (Harcourt-Brown 2002).
Diagnosic procedures
The definitive diagnosis of encephalitozoonosis in vivo is difficult, as signs of neurological or renal disease do not preclude other diseases. A tentative clinical diagnosis is usually obtained by a combination of clinical, neurological and ophthalmological examinations, serological tests and by the exlusion of differential diagnosis. A negative antibody titer usually excludes an infection, although rarely spores can be found in the absence of specific antibodies, especially in the early stage of infection (but these cases are usually asymptomatic; Csokai et al. 2009b), during infections at a very early age or when immunosuppressive primary diseases are present (Lyngset 1980; Müller 1998; Csokai et al. 2009b). Detection of specific antibodies only confirms previous contact with the pathogen; many clinically healthy rabbits show moderate to high titers (Harcourt-Brown 2004; Künzel et al. 2008; Csokai et al. 2009b). Post-mortem diagnosis demonstrates spores in a large number of animals without symptoms of encephalitozoonosis (Csokai et al. 2009a, b); the infection seems to develop and spread slowly and symptoms do not develop in the majority of cases (Ewringmann and Göbel 1999; Csokai et al. 2009a, b).
Radiography of the skull can help in the diagnosis of otitis media/interna, which represents the main differential diagnosis for vestibular disease in rabbits, but it may lead to false positive or negative results (see differential diagnosis). A recent study documented that the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can support a clinical diagnosis of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits (Jass et al. 2008). It was concluded that lymphomonocytic pleocytosis and increased concentrations of protein in CSF are characteristic signs of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits. However, any other viral, protozoan or immune-mediated encephalitis can induce a similar result (Jass et al. 2008).
Serology
Serological detection of antibodies is the most sensitive diagnostic method during the early stage of infection (Cox and Gallichio 1978; Csokai et al. 2009b). In laboratory rabbits, serum antibodies against E. cuniculi develop within 3 weeks post-infection (Cox et al. 1979). Seroconversion can be demonstrated at least 2 weeks before intracellular organisms are detected and 4 weeks before histopathological lesions in the kidney or organisms in the urine can be found. Cerebral lesions are observed only around 8 weeks after initiation of serum antibody response (Cox and Gallichio 1978). Subsequently, antibody titres remain high over several months after exposure to E. cuniculi, then decrease slightly and can persist for years with fluctuating levels (Waller et al. 1978; Scharmann et al. 1986). It is not known whether animals excrete spores during episodes of increasing antibody levels (Scharmann et al. 1986).
Passive immunity is transferred from infected dams to their offspring and maternal antibodies are detectable up to the age of 4 weeks. After a seronegative period, seroconversion in response to an active infection develops in young rabbits at an age of 8 to 10 weeks (Lyngset 1980).
Several studies demonstrated a good to excellent correlation between serological results and pathohistological lesions, although regularly a few seronegative rabbits show minimal to moderate levels of interstitial nephritis (Waller 1977; Cox and Gallichio 1978; Cox et al. 1979; Scharmann et al. 1986; Eröksüz et al. 1999; Csokai et al. 2009b).
Worldwide surveys have shown high rates of infection in rabbits with neurological signs as well as in asymptomatic animals (Table 1).
Serology is the most important diagnostic tool for diagnosis of E. cuniculi infection in the living animal. Various diagnostic tests have been developed in order to detect antibodies to E. cuniculi and all are suitable for the use in rabbits. Indirect fluorescent antibody technique (IFAT) and ELISA are the most common tests and correlate well with each other (Boot et al. 2000; Jordan et al. 2006). Serological screening is used by laboratories to identify and cull potentially infected animals to reduce interference with experimental results (Pakes and Gerrity 1994). Nevertheless, seroconversion only indicates chronic E. cuniculi infection but does not confirm the organism to be responsible for disease symptoms, because of the high rate of sub-clinically infected animals. However, a negative serological result rules out E. cuniculi as a cause of an apparent disease. Therefore, serological diagnosis can be used to distinguish between the two main possible aetiological agents causative for vestibular disorders in rabbits. If the animals are found to be seronegative to E. cuniculi, there is a high probability that P. multocida is responsible for clinical signs (Kunstýř and Naumann 1985).
Spore detection in tissue
The pathohistological changes (mostly non-suppurative, often granulomatous, encephalitis and nephritis; see “Pathology and pathophysiology”) are indicative of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits. Intracellular spores can be detected post-mortem in sections primarily of the kidneys and the brain and are not strictly associated with pathohistological changes (Shadduck et al. 1979). The infection seems to spread from the urinary tract to the neurological organs; therefore, spores are first detected in the kidneys 4 weeks after seroconversion, followed by the brain 8 weeks after seroconversion (Cox and Gallichio 1978). In naturally infected rabbits, spore can be detected slightly more frequently in the kidneys than in the brain (Csokai et al. 2009a, b). Due to the small size of the spores the detection with routine staining methods, e.g. hematoxylin–eosin, is difficult; specific methods such as chromotropic staining (e.g. acid-fast trichrome or Ziehl–Neelsen), immunofluorescence or chemofluorescence are more sensitive (Weber et al. 1999). Electron microscopy is considered the “gold standard” for spore detection (Didier et al. 1995a, b); however, it is laborious to perform, and as with chemofluorescence or chromotropic staining, it cannot differentiate between E. cuniculi and E. hellem (Didier et al. 1991), which is important for the species diagnosis in human samples.
Spore detection in body fluids
Excretion of spores with the urine can be considered the primary mode of dissemination for E. cuniculi. The first spores in urine can be detected 3 to 5 weeks after seroconversion (Cox and Gallichio 1978; Scharmann et al. 1986), but excretion declines over the following months (Cox and Pye 1975; Cox et al. 1979). As with histopathology, specific staining methods are more sensitive than standard techniques (Didier et al. 1995a, b). Since the excretion of spores with the urine takes place sporadically, a negative result does not exclude infection (Cox et al. 1979; Csokai et al. 2009a). In urine as well as in cerebrospinal fluid, DNA can be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) if spores are excreted (see below). Excretion via faeces is discussed but could not be demonstrated regularly (Von Kücken et al. 1987; Harcourt-Brown and Holloway 2003).
PCR-based detection and differentiation
For human samples, DNA-based differentiation and genotyping (see “Epidemiology and host spectrum”) is mandatory since infections with E. cuniculi and other microsporidia are usually of zoonotic origin (Deplazes et al. 1996). Electron microscopy allows differentiation of most but not all species of microsporidia and usually requires multiplication of spores in cell culture (De Groote et al. 1995; Deplazes et al. 1996; Weber et al. 1999). For clinical applications, direct PCR amplification either with species-specific primers (Weber et al. 1999) or with conserved primers in combination with sequencing or restriction fragment length-polymorphism analysis is applied (Katzwinkel-Wladarsch et al. 1997). Alternatively, nested PCR is carried out to increase the sensitivity of detection (Katzwinkel-Wladarsch et al. 1996; Kock et al. 1997).
In rabbits, the use of (nested) PCR is less common. The rationale for applying this technique is the increased sensitivity. DNA of E. cuniculi can be detected in tissue (Baneux and Pognan 2003; Csokai et al. 2009b) and by nested PCR in the urine and liquor of infected rabbits (Jass et al. 2006).
However, PCR of body fluids seems to be an unreliable method, since the presence of DNA is not correlated with disease, and even in clinically ill animals, DNA detection can be negative (Jass et al. 2006; Csokai et al. 2009b). In tissue samples, DNA amplification by conventional or nested PCR is less sensitive than histopathological spore detection after specific staining (Csokai et al. 2009b). On the other hand, PCR from liquefied lens material after phacoemulsification is highly suitable for the detection of E. cuniculi in rabbits with phacoclastic uveitis (Künzel et al. 2008; Csokai et al. 2009b).
Therapy and control
In rabbits with encephalitozoonosis clinical signs are not only associated with the presence of the organism in the different tissues but can be also a result of the inflammatory process that follows after the parasite has been eliminated. In addition, therapeutic and control measures depend on the clinical manifestation of the infection in the central nervous system, the urinary tract or the eye or a combination of these. Consequently, no uniform treatment protocol exists for rabbits with presumptive encephalitozoonosis. Treatment regime for rabbits with neurological disease should include causative therapy (limitation of the spread of the organisms in the CNS), suppression of accompanied inflammatory reaction, control of potential concurrent disease (e.g. bacterial infection) and control of seizures and/or rolling (Deeb and Carpenter 2004).
Until now, no drugs have been approved for the treatment of E. cuniculi infection in rabbits. In some case studies of pet rabbits showing vestibular disease, treatment with glucocorticoids in combination with either enrofloxacin or oxytetracycline or fenbendazole resulted in a 50% initial recovery rate, but it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of those treatment protocols (Ewringmann and Göbel 1999; Harcourt-Brown and Holloway 2003; Künzel et al. 2008).
Several in vitro studies have been carried out to evaluate the drug susceptibility of E. cuniculi. Antibiotics, such as fumagillin, sparfloxacin, oxytetracycline and anthelmintics, including albendazole, oxibendazole and thiabendazole, were the most effective (Waller 1979; Shadduck 1980; Beauvais et al. 1994; Franssen et al. 1995).
According to Beauvais et al. (1994), albendazole is regarded as the most effective drug against microsporidioses in humans. The results of Neuschl et al. (1999) concerning the influence of albendazole on the development of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits indicate its inhibitory effect on the development of the disease and suggest that it is well tolerated. However, albendazole is known to be embryotoxic and teratogenic in rabbits. Fenbendazole, another benzimidazole, has also been shown to prevent and treat E. cunciuli infections in rabbits (Suter et al. 2001). Rabbits that were infected experimentally during their oral treatment with fenbedazole (20 mg/kg/day) did not seroconvert, and spores could not be isolated from their brain tissue. In the therapeutic part of the study of Suter et al. (2001) naturally infected rabbits were orally treated with fenbendazole for 4 weeks. Attempts to isolate parasite stages from the brain tissue after therapy failed. Due to this study, the drug of choice for the causative treatment of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits is considered fenbendazole (20 mg/kg orally, once a day over a period of 28 days).
Neurological signs associated with E. cuniculi infections are due to the inflammatory reaction caused by the rupture of brain cells by the multiplying organisms, rather than to the organisms themselves (Feaga 1997). Therefore, corticosteroids are used to reduce the inflammatory reaction, as it is done in other animal species to treat granulomatous meningoencephalitis. Nevertheless, anti-inflammatory treatment with corticosteroids is discussed controversially, because of their immunosuppressive effects. E. cuniculi infection is controlled by the regulatory function of the T lymphocytes. Therefore, immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids may affect T-cell populations and the production of T-cell-derived cytokines, which is believed to be the main defence mechanism against E. cuniculi. In accordance with these theses, Horváth et al. (1998) described that low and repeated dosage of cyclophosphamide can modify the pathomorphological response to E. cuniculi. The use of glucocorticoids in order to improve clinical treatment of E. cuniculi induced central nervous encephalitis has to be further evaluated in controlled studies.
As otitis media/interna is the main differential diagnosis for rabbits showing vestibular signs, some authors recommend, besides causative and anti-inflammatory treatment, additional antibiotic therapy (Kunstýř and Naumann 1985).
In rabbits showing seizures or rolling sedatives such as diazepam or midazolam are recommended.
Recently, supportive treatment options such as stress reduction (noise) and physiotherapy have become more important in the therapy of pet rabbits with vestibular signs.
Mostly, rabbits with signs of renal failure due to encephalitozoonosis are euthanized because of the poor prognosis.
The successful conservative treatment of phacoclastic uveitis in rabbits is only reported by Ewringmann and Göbel (1999). These authors describe a treatment regime with systemic-administered dexamethasone and oxytetracycline in conjunction with eye ointments containing dexamethasone and tetracycline. In most of the pet rabbits, signs of reactive uveitis permanently disappeared, but white granulomas and cataracts were still persisting after conventional therapy. Furthermore, several other authors reported poor response to topical therapy (Wolfer et al. 1993; Stiles et al. 1997). Surgical removal of the lens by phacoemulsification has been shown to be a successful causative treatment modality for rabbits with phacoclastic uveitis, together with medical management (Stiles et al. 1997; Fechle and Sigler 2002). Therefore, treatment of choice for this condition is the immediate removal of the lens. The sooner surgery is performed, the better the clinical outcome. In chronic cases of endophthalmitis, enucleation of the affected eye is recommended.
In order to prevent the spread of infection within (laboratory) rabbit colonies, seropositive rabbits should be removed, as they may excrete spores. However, a complete eradication programme must include disinfection of the animal facilities, cages and equipment (Waller 1979). A study to investigate the sensitivity of spores to various temperatures and common disinfectants was performed by Waller (1979). Boiling for 5 min or autoclaving at 120°C for 10 min killed all spores. Of the 11 disinfectants studied, nine (among them ethanol 70%, formaldehyde 0.3%, hydrogen peroxide 1%, sodium hydroxide 1%) inactivated all E. cuniculi spores exposed for 30 min at recommended working concentrations.
References
Ashton N, Cook C, Clegg F (1976) Encephalitozoonosis (nosematosis) causing bilateral cataract in a rabbit. Br J Ophthal 60:618–631
Baneux PJR, Pognan F (2003) In utero transmission of Encephalitozoon cuniculi strain type I in rabbits. Lab Anim 37:132–138
Beauvais B, Sarfati C, Challier S, Derouin F (1994) In vitro model to asses effect of antimicrobial agents on Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 38(10):2440–2448
Biderre C, Pagès M, Méténier G, Canning EU, Vivarès CP (1995) Evidence for the smallest nuclear genome (2.9 Mb) in the microsporidium Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Mol. Biochem Parasitol 74(2):229–231
Boot R, Hansen C, Nozari N, Thuis H (2000) Comparison of assays for antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi in rabbits. Lab Anim 34(3):281–289
Canning EU, Lom J (1986) The Microsporidia of vertebrates. Academic, London
Chalupský J, Vávra J, Bedrník P (1979) Encephalitozoonosis in laboratory animals—a serological survey. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 26:1–8
Chalupsky J, Vavra J, Gaudin J (1990) Mise en evidence serologique de la presence d‘ encephalitozoonose et de toxoplasmose chez le lapin de Gareene (Oryctolagus cuniculus) en France. Bull Soc Franc Parasitol 8:91–95
Cox JC, Gallichio HA (1978) Serological and histological studies on adult rabbits with recent, naturally acquired encephalitozoonosis. Res Vet Sci 24:260–261
Cox JC, Pye D (1975) Serodiagnosis of nosematosis by immunofluorescence using cell culture grown organisms. Lab Anim 9:297–304
Cox JC, Ross J (1980) A serological survey of Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection in the wild rabbit in England and Scotland. Res Vet Sci 28:396
Cox JC, Hamilton RC, Attwood HD (1979) An investigation of the route and progression of Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection in adult rabbits. J Protozool 26:260–265
Cox JC, Pye D, Edmonds JW, Shepherd R (1980) An investigation of Encephalitozoon cuniculi in the wild rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus in Victoria, Australia. J Hyg (Lond) 84(2):295–300
Csokai J, Gruber A, Künzel F, Tichy A, Joachim A (2009a) Encephalitozoonosis in pet rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus): pathohistological findings in animals with latent infection versus clinical manifestation. Parasitol Res 104:629–635
Csokai J, Joachim A, Gruber A, Tichy A, Pakozdy A, Künzel F (2009b) Diagnostic markers for encephalitozoonosis in pet rabbits. Vet Parasitol 163(1–2):18–26
Deeb BJ, Carpenter JW (2004) Neurologic and musculoskeletal disease. In: Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (eds) Ferrets, Rabbits and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery, 2nd edn. Saunders, St. Louis, pp 203–210
Deeb BJ, Di Giacomo RF (1994) Cerebral larva migrans caused by Baylascaris sp. in pet rabbits. J Am Vet Med Assoc 205:1744–1747
De Groote M, Visvesvara G, Wilson M, Pieniazek N, Slemenda S, da Silva A, Leitch G, Bryan R, Reves R (1995) Polymerase chain reaction and culture confirmation of disseminated Encephalitozoon cuniculi in a patient with AIDS: Successful therapy with albendazole. J Infect Dis 171:1375–1378
Deplazes P, Mathis A, Baumgartner R, Tanner I, Weber R (1996) Immunologic and molecular characteristics of Encephalitozoon-like microsporidia isolated from humans and rabbits indicate that Encephalitozoon cuniculi is a zoonotic parasite. Clin Infect Dis 22:557–559
Didier PJ, Didier ES, Orenstein JM, Shadduck JA (1991) Fine structure of a new human microsporidian, Encephalitozoon hellem, in culture. J Protozool 38:502–507
Didier E, Orenstein JM, Aldras A, Bertucci D, Rogers LB, Janney A (1995a) Comparison of three staining methods for detecting microsporidia in fluids. J Clin Microbiol 33:3138–3145
Didier ES, Vossbrinck CR, Baker MD, Rogers LB, Bertucci DC, Shadduck JA (1995b) Identification and characterization of three Encephalitozoon cuniculi strains. Parasitology 111(Pt 4):411–421
Dipineto L, Rinaldi L, Santaniello A, Sensale M, Cuomo A, Calabria M, Menna LF, Fioretti A (2008) Serological survey for antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi in pet rabbits in Italy. Zoonoses Publ Health 55:173–175
Dubey JP, Brown CA, Carpenter JL, Moore JJ (1992) Fatal toxoplasmosis in domestic rabbits in the USA. Vet Parasitol 44:305–309
Ebrecht D, Müller E (2004) Zoonosen des Kaninchens. Tieraerztl Prax K 32:363–369
Eröksüz Y, Eröksüz H, Özer H, Cevik A, Ünver Ö (1999) A survey of Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection in rabbit colonies in Elazig, Turkey: pathomorphologic and serologic (carbonimmunoassay test) studies. Isr J Vet Med 54:73–77
Ewringmann A, Göbel T (1999) Untersuchungen zur Klinik und Therapie der Encephalitozoonose beim Heimtierkaninchen. Kleintierpraxis 44:357–372
Feaga WP (1997) Wry neck in rabbits. JAVMA 210(4):480
Fechle LM, Sigler RL (2002) Phacoemulsification for the management of Encephalitozoonon cuniculi-induced phacoclastic uveitis in a rabbit. Vet Ophthalmol 5:211–215
Flatt RE, Jackson SJ (1970) Renal nosematosis in young rabbits. Path Vet 7:492–497
Franssen FF, Lumeij JT, van Knapen F (1995) Susceptibility of Encephalitozoon cuniculi to several drugs in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39(6):1265–1268
Franzen C (2004) Microsporidia: how can they invade other cells? Trends Parasitol 20(6):275–279
Furuoka H, Sato H, Kubo M, Owaki S, Kobayashi Y, Matsui T, Kamiya H (2003) Neuropathological observation of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) affected with raccoon roundworm (Baylisascaris procyonis) larva migrans in Japan. J Vet Med Sci 65(6):695–699
Giordano C, Weigt A, Vercelli A, Rondena M, Grilli G, Giudice C (2005) Immunohistochemical identification of Encephalitozoon cuniculi in phacoclastic uveitis in four rabbits. Vet Ophthalmol 8:271–275
Grahn B, Wolfer J, Keller Ch (1991) Diagnostic Ophtalmology. Can Vet J 32:372–373
Grest P, Albicker P, Hoelzle L, Wild P, Pospischil A (2002) Herpes simplex encephalitis in a domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Comp Pathol 126(4):308–311
Gruber A, Pakozdy A, Weissenböck H, Csokai J, Künzel F (2009) A retrospective study of neurological disease in 118 rabbits. J Comp Pathol 140(1):31–37
Halánová M, Cisláková L, Valencákova A, Bálent P, Adam J, Trávnicek M (2003) Serological screening of occurrence of antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi in humans and animals in Eastern Slovakia. Ann Agric Environ Med 10(1):117–120
Harcourt-Brown F (2002) Textbook of rabbit medicine. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Harcourt-Brown FM (2004) Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection in rabbits. Semin Avian Exot Pet Med 13:86–93
Harcourt-Brown FM, Holloway HKR (2003) Encephalitozoon cuniculi in pet rabbits. Vet Rec 152:427–431
Horváth M, Svicky E, Sevcikova Z (1998) Pathomorphological response to Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection in cyclophosphamide-treated rabbits. Acta Vet (Brno) 67:37–42
Igarashi M, Oohashi E, Dautu G, Ueno A, Kariya T, Furuya K (2008) High seroprevalence of Encephalitozoon cuniculi in pet rabbits in Japan. J Vet Med Sci 70(12):1301–1304
Jass A, Matiasek K, Hartmann K, Küchenhoff H, Fischer A (2006) Evaluierung von Liquoruntersuchung und PCR zur Diagnose der Enzephalitozoonose beim Kaninchen. Prakt Tierarzt 87:518–524
Jass A, Matiasek K, Henke J, Küchenhoff H, Hartmann K, Fischer A (2008) Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in healthy rabbits and rabbits with clinically suspected encephalitozoonosis. Vet Rec 162(19):618–622
Jordan CN, Zajac AM, Lindsay DS (2006) Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection in rabbits. Compend Contin Educ Vet 28:108–116
Karp BE (1999) Rabies in two privately owned domestic rabbits. J Am Vet Med Assoc 215:1824–1827
Katinka MD, Duprat S, Cornillot E, Méténier G, Thomarat F, Prensier G, Barbe V, Peyretaillade E, Brottier P, Wincker P, Delbac F, El Alaoui H, Peyret P, Saurin W, Gouy M, Weissenbach J, Vivarès CP (2001) Genome sequence and gene compaction of the eukaryote parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Nature 414(6862):450–453
Katzwinkel-Wladarsch S, Lieb M, Heise W, Löscher T, Rinder H (1996) Direct amplification and species determination of microsporidian DNA from stool specimens. Trop Med Int Health 1:373–378
Katzwinkel-Wladarsch S, Deplazes P, Weber R, Löscher T, Rinder H (1997) Comparison of polymerase chain reaction with light microscopy for detection of microsporidia in clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 16:7–10
Keeble EJ, Shaw DJ (2006) Seroprevalence of antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi in domestic rabbits in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec 158:539–544
Khan IA, Moretto M (1999) Role of gamma interferon in cellular immune response against murine Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection. Infect Immun 67(4):1887–1893
Khan IA, Schwartzman JD, Kasper LH, Moretto M (1999) CD8+ CTLs are essential for protective immunity against Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection. J Immunol 162(10):6086–6091
Khan IA, Moretto M, Weiss LM (2001) Immune response to Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection. Microbes Infect 3(5):401–405
Kock NP, Petersen H, Fenner T, Sobottka I, Schmetz C, Deplazes P, Pieniazek NJ, Albrecht H, Schottelius J (1997) Species-specific identification of microsporidia in stool and intestinal biopsy specimens by the polymerase chain reaction. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 16:369–376
Koudela B, Vítovec J, Kucerová Z, Ditrich O, Trávnícek J (1993) The severe combined immunodeficient mouse as a model for Encephalitozoon cuniculi microsporidiosis. Folia Parasitol. (Praha) 40(4):279–286
Kunstýř I, Naumann S (1985) Head tilt in rabbits caused by pasteurellosis and encephalitozoonosis. Lab Anim 19:208–213
Künzel F, Gruber A, Tichy A, Edelhofer R, Nell B, Hassan J, Leschnik M, Thalhammer JG, Joachim A (2008) Clinical symptoms and diagnosis of encephalitozoonosis in pet rabbits. Vet Parasitol 151:115–124
Leland MM, Hubbard GV, Dubey JP (1992) Clinical toxoplasmosis in domestic rabbits. Lab Anim Sci 42:318–319
Lev L (1982) Untersuchungen von experimentellen und spontanen Encephalitozoon cuniculi-Infektionen bei Kaninchen mit 3 serologischen Methoden. Dissertation, Veterinary University of Hannover
Levkut M, Lesnik F, Balent P, Levkutová M, Kolodzieyski L, Horváth M (1998) An unusal manifestation of encephalitozoonosis in chinchilla rabbits. Can Vet J 39(9):576–577
Lyngset A (1980) A survey of serum antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi in breeding rabbits and their young. Lab Anim Sci 30:558–561
Mathis A (2000) Microsporidia: emerging advances in understanding the basic biology of these unique organisms. Int J Parasitol 30:795–804
Mathis A, Weber R, Deplazes P (2005) Zoonotic potential of the microsporidia. Clin Microbiol Rev 18:423–445
Méteniér G, Vivarès CP (2001) Molecular characteristics and physiology of microsporidia. Microbes Inf 3:407–415
Metzler A, Ehrensperger F, Wyler R (1978) Natural borna virus infection in rabbits. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 25(2):161–164
Meyer-Breckwoldt A (1996) Epidemiologische und klinische Untersuchungen zur Encephalitozoonose beim Zwergkaninchen. Dissertation, Veterinary University, Hannover
Müller C (1998) Untersuchungen zur Diagnostik, Biologie und Verbreitung von Microsporidien bei Kaninchen und anderen Tierarten. Dissertation, University of Zürich
Müller K, Fuchs W, Heblinski W, Teifke W, Brunnberg L, Gruber AD, Klopfleisch R (2009) Encephalitis in a rabbit caused by human Herpes virus-1. JAVMA 235(1):66–69
Murray KA, Hobbs BA, Griffith JW (1985) Acute meningoencephalomyelitis in a rabbit infected with Pasteurella multocida. Lab Anim Sci 35(2):169–171
Nast R, Middleton DM, Wheler CL (1996) Generalized encephalitozoonosis in a Jersey wooly rabbit. Can Vet J 37:303–305
Neuschl J, Čonkova E, Krokavec P, Čelarova E, Halanova M, Hipikova V, Balent P, Šutiak V (1999) The development of encephalitozoonosis in rabbits after infection by Encephalitozoon cuniculi and treatment with albendazole. Acta Vet (Beograd) 49(4):327–334
Neuwirt E (1988) Ein Beitrag zur Diagnose der Encephalitozoonose (Nosematose) beim Kaninchen; Vergleich zwischen direkten und indirekten Nachweismethoden. Dissertation, University of Munich
Okewole EA (2008) Seroprevalence of antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi in domestic rabbits in Nigeria. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 75(1):33–38
Pakes SP, Gerrity LW (1994) Protozoal Diseases. In: Manning PJ, Ringler DH, Newcomer CE (eds) The biology of the laboratory rabbit, 2nd edn. Academic, London, pp 205–224
Petri M (1969) Studies on Nosema cuniculi found in transplantable ascites tumors with a survey of microsporidiosis in mammals. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 204(Suppl):1–91
Rönnebäumer K, Gross U, Bohne W (2008) The nascent parasitophorous vacuole membrane of Encephalitozoon cuniculi is formed by host cell lipids and contains pores which allow nutrient uptake. Eukaryot Cell 7(6):1001–1008
Santaniello A, Dipineto L, Rinaldi L, Menna LF, Cringoli G, Fioretti A (2009) Serological survey of Encephalitozoon cuniculi in farm rabbits in Italy. Res Vet Sci 87(1):67–69
Scharmann W, Reblin L, Griem W (1986) Untersuchungen über die Infektion von Kaninchen durch Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wschr 99:20–24
Schmidt EC, Shadduck JA (1983) Murine encephalitozoonosis model for studying the host-parasite relationship of a chronic infection. Infect Immun 40(3):936–942
Shadduck JA (1980) Effect of fumagillin on in vitro multiplication of Encephalitozoon cuniculi. J Protozool 27(2):202–208
Shadduck JA, Pakes SP (1971) Encephalitozoonosis (nosematosis) and toxoplasmosis. Am J Pathol 64(3):657–673
Shadduck JA, Watson WT, Pakes SP, Cali A (1979) Animal infectivity of Encephalitozoon cuniculi. J Parasitol 65:123–129
Snyder SB, Fox JG, Soave OA (1973) Sub-clinical otitis media associated with Pasteurella multocida infections in New Zealand White rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Lab Anim Sci 23(2):270–272
Stiles J, Didier E, Ritchie B, Greenacre C, Willis M, Martin C (1997) Encephalitozoon cuniculi in the lens of a rabbit with phacoclastic uveitis: confirmation and treatment. Vet Comp Ophthalmol 7:233–238
Suter C, Müller-Doblies UU, Hatt JM, Deplazes P (2001) Prevention and treatment of Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection in rabbits with fenbendazole. Vet Rec 148:478–480
Thomas WB (2000) Vestibular dysfunction. Vet Clin N Am: Small Anim Pract 30:227–249
Thomas C, Finn M, Twigg L, Deplazes P, Thompson RC (1997) Microsporidia (Encephalitozoon cuniculi) in wild rabbits in Australia. Aust Vet J 75(11):808–810
Von Kücken U, Ludwig HJ, Lange S, Günther H, Dix B, Lange M, Müller D (1987) Eine generalisierte Erkrankung des Kaninchens durch Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Mh Vet Med 42:781–784
Waller T (1977) The India ink immunoreaction: a method for the rapid diagnosis of encephalitozoonosis. Lab Anim 11:93–97
Waller T (1979) Sensitivity of Encephalitozoon cuniculi to various temperatures, disinfectants and drugs. Lab Anim 13:227–230
Waller T, Morein B, Fabiansson E (1978) Humoral immune response to infection with Encephalitozoon cuniculi in rabbits. Lab Anim 12:145–148
Wasson K, Peper RL (2000) Mammalian microsporidiosis. Vet Pathol 37:113–128
Weber R, Mathis A, Deplazes P (1996) Intestinal and systemic infections due to microsporidia. Internist 37:912–918
Weber R, Schwartz DA, Deplazes P (1999) Laboratory Diagnosis of Microsporidiosis. In: Wittner M, Weiss LM (eds) The Microsporidia and Microsporidiosis. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., pp 315–362
Weissenböck H, Hainfellner JA, Berger J, Kasper I, Budka H (1997) Naturally occurring herpes simplex encephalitis in a domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Vet Pathol 34(1):44–47
Wicher V, Baughn RE, Fuentealba C, Shadduck JA, Abbruscato F, Wicher K (1991) Enteric infection with an obligate intracellular parasite, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, in an experimental model. Infect Immun 59:2225–2231
Williams DL (1999) Laboratory Animal Ophthalmology. In: Gelatt KN (ed) Veterinary Ophthalmology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1209–1236
Wilson JM (1979) Encephalitozoon cuniculi in wild European rabbits and a fox. Res Vet Sci 26:114
Wolfer J, Grahn B, Wilcock B, Percy D (1993) Phacoclastic uveitis in the rabbit. Prog Vet Comp Ophthalmol 3:92–97
Wright JH, Craighead EM (1922) Infectious motor paralysis in young rabbits. J Exp Med 36:135–140
Xu Y, Weiss LM (2005) The microsporidian polar tube: a highly specialised invasion organelle. Int J Parasitol 35:941–953
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Künzel, F., Joachim, A. Encephalitozoonosis in rabbits. Parasitol Res 106, 299–309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1679-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1679-3