Abstract
The involvement of brain structures in specific cognitive functions is not straightforward. In order to characterize the brain micro-structural correlates of cognitive domains, 52 healthy subjects, age 25–82 years, completed a computerized neuropsychological battery and were scanned using magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging. Factor analysis of 44 different cognitive scores was performed, isolating three cognitive domains—executive function, information processing speed and memory. Partial correlation was conducted between DTI parameters and each of the three cognitive domains controlling for age and motor function. Regions showing significant correlations with cognitive domains are domain-specific and are consistent with previous knowledge. While executive function was correlated with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters in frontal white matter and in the superior longitudinal fasciculus, information processing speed was correlated with DTI parameters in the cingulum, corona radiata, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, parietal white matter and in the thalamus. Memory performance was correlated with DTI measures in temporal and frontal gray matter and white matter regions, including the cingulate cortex and the parahippocampus. Thus, inter-subject variability in cognitive performance and tissue morphology, as expressed by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging, can be used to relate tissue microstructure with cognitive performance and to provide information to corroborate other functional localization techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
It is widely agreed that brain function and structure are associated; however, the localization of specific functions to distinct brain structures is not straightforward.
Various studies have examined the relationship between brain structure and cognitive function, including animal studies, lesion studies and neuroimaging studies (Scoville and Milner 1957; Funahashi et al. 1989; Cabeza and Nyberg 2000). However, there are still conflicting results on the involvement of brain structures in specific cognitive functions. This has number of possible reasons. First, most of higher cognitive functions are complex and involve a network of brain regions. Second, there is high variability in the tasks used in different studies measuring the same brain function. For example, memory function is known from lesion and neuroimaging studies to involve the hippocampus and the medial temporal lobe (Thompson and Kim 1996). However, other brain regions are known to be involved in different aspects of memory. The prefrontal cortex, mainly the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (D’Esposito et al. 1998), has been implicated in working memory by lesion and imaging studies. Other regions, including the cerebellum, motor areas and language areas, are involved in various learning and memory processes (Thompson and Kim 1996).
Aging is associated with a gradual, progressive decline in cognitive function. Cross-sectional and longitudinal behavioral studies have found significant declines in various functions. Among the cognitive functions that decline with aging, are executive functions, information processing speed and memory (Craik et al. 1987; Petersen et al. 1992; Youngjohn and Crook 1993; Small 2001)
Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) measures the magnitude and directionality of water diffusion in tissue (Basser and Pierpaoli 1998). Various DTI studies have demonstrated that DTI can characterize the brain localization of cognitive functions by correlating cognitive performance with DTI indices (Klingberg et al. 2000; Madden et al. 2004; Tuch et al. 2005; Forstmann et al. 2008; Charlton et al. 2006).
However, most of these studies focused on very specific tasks or brain regions, mainly in white matter regions. The aim of the present study was to characterize the brain localization of cognitive domains. In order to characterize specific cognitive domains, we used a broad battery of commonly used computerized neuropsychological tests to enable a comprehensive and detailed cognitive evaluation. Factor analysis of the tests scores was performed, and tests with common variability are united to one factor, thus isolating three cognitive domains: executive function, information processing speed, and memory.
Voxel-based analysis (VBA) of gray matter and white matter structures was used to characterize the micro-structural correlates of performance in the three cognitive domains identified in the factor analysis. The present study focused on a cognitively healthy population over a wide range of ages to facilitate high inter-subject variability in cognitive as well as micro-structural parameters. We correlated the scores in each cognitive domain with DTI parameters in both gray and white matter, correcting for multiple comparisons. The correlation procedure was controlled for age and for motor function.
Methods
Subjects
Participants were 54 cognitively healthy volunteers (ages 25–82 years, all right-handed, 32 female). Two subjects were excluded due to severe leukoaraiosis, resulting in 52 participants. Mean/median age was 51 years, with a standard deviation of 16 years. Subjects were evenly distributed over the age range. Participants were recruited from the general population by distribution of ads in community centers and in academic institutes. The local Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center Helsinki Committee approved the research protocol, and all participants signed an informed consent. Inclusion and exclusion of subjects was based upon self-report. Participants had no history of neurological disease or psychological disorders, were not on neuropsychiatric medication, had no history of drug or alcohol abuse, and had intact vision. Volunteers with common age-related diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and high levels of cholesterol were not excluded from the cohort.
Neuropsychological tests
Participants underwent a series of computerized cognitive tests (MindStreams®, NeuroTrax Corp., Fresh Meadows, NY) that evaluate performance across an array of cognitive domains (memory, executive function, visual spatial perception, verbal function, attention, information processing speed, and motor skills) and provide measurements of accuracy and reaction time (Dwolatzky et al. 2003).
Factor analysis
Factor analysis was performed using SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), as follows:
-
1.
Factor analysis of 44 cognitive outcome parameter scores using principal component analysis (PCA) with orthogonal (VARIMAX) rotation and limiting the number of factors to 5 (although 10 factors obtained eigenvalues higher than 1) that explained 65% of the items total variance.
-
2.
Based on the rotated component matrix, and as we aimed to extract “pure” factors, we excluded cognitive scores that contributed to more than one factor with loadings higher than 0.4. 14 scores were excluded.
-
3.
Each factor contained cognitive scores with loadings greater than 0.4. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of the factors. Factors with a Cronbach’s alpha of ≤0.8 were excluded, resulting in the exclusion of two factors and the retention of three.
-
4.
The three factors retained were comprised of 18 cognitive scores. The scores and their factor loadings are shown in Table 1. Each factor was assigned a name describing its constituent scores: executive function, memory, and information processing speed. A detailed description of the tests is appended in Electronic Supplementary Material, briefly:
-
a.
The executive function factor included scores from the Go-NoGo response inhibition test and Stroop interference test. The Go-NoGo test is a continuous performance test of simple reaction time and response inhibition. In the Stroop interference test performed here, the conflicting information provided by the meaning of a word and the color of its letters lead to a decrement in performance relative to the test phases where there is no conflict and includes three phases—in phase I and II—no interference, phase III—with interference. The executive function domain is an average of reaction time (RT) in phase III with interference, response time difference (RD) between RT in phase III and phase II, RT in phase I without interference and standard deviations (SD) in phase I without interference.
-
b.
The memory domain included non-verbal and verbal memory tests. The verbal memory test measures immediate and delayed recognition memory for verbal paired associates. In the non-verbal memory test, participants are presented with eight black-and-white drawn pictures of simple common objects or shapes and are instructed to remember their orientation. Each of the tests included four repetitions of the study phase and a recognition test. This is followed by 10 min delayed recognition test. The memory domain included accuracy in four repetitions and delayed phase of the non-verbal memory test and accuracy in the first repletion and delayed phase of the verbal memory test.
-
c.
The staged information processing speed test measures information processing at increasing levels of complexity. The test is comprised of three levels of information processing load: single digits, two-digit arithmetic problems (e.g., 5 − 1), and three-digit arithmetic problems (e.g., 3 + 2 − 1). For each of these three levels, stimuli are presented at three different rates (speed levels), incrementally increasing as testing continues. The information processing speed domain is an average of the RT in stage 2 (two-digit arithmetic problems) in threes different speed levels and SD of the RT in stage 2, level 3.
-
a.
-
5.
Calculation of factor scores: for each factor, the z-scores of the tests comprising it were averaged to give the factor score. These factor scores served as a covariate input for the DTI indices.
MRI acquisition
MR imaging was performed on a 3T (GE) MRI system at the Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center. The MRI protocol included conventional anatomy sequences and DTI acquired with a standard head-coil.
Conventional anatomy sequences
T1 weighted images: 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) sequence with the following parameters: 66 axial slices, TR/TE = 400/3.2 ms, and resolution of 1 × 1 × 2 mm3, scan time of 4 min. T2 weighted images: fast spin echo T2-weighted sequence with 24 axial slices, TR/TE = 4,600/85 ms, echo train length of 32 echoes, and resolution of 1 × 1 × 6 mm3, scan time of 56 s. FLAIR images: fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence with 24 axial slices, TR/TE/TI = 9,000/140/2,100 ms, and resolution of 1 × 1 × 6 mm3. These images were used for screening and subjects with brain pathologies were excluded. Two subjects were excluded due to severe leukoaraiosis.
DTI protocol
Spin-echo diffusion weighted echo planar imaging (DW-EPI) sequence was performed with 48 axial slices and resolution of 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm3. Diffusion parameters were: Δ/δ = 25/19 ms, b value of 1,000 s/mm2 acquired with 19 gradient directions. The DW-EPI sequence was gated to the cardiac cycle with TR of 30 R–R intervals and TE of 88 ms.
Image analysis
Correction of head motion image artifacts, normalization and statistical analysis were performed using the SPM software (version 2, UCL, London, UK). The image analysis routine of the diffusion tensor data included the following steps:
-
1.
Correction of head motion using a least squares algorithm and 6-parameter (rigid body) transformations.
-
2.
DTI analysis using in-house software written in Matlab 7.3.0 (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA), from which axial FA and ADC maps were calculated as described previously (Basser and Pierpaoli 1998).
-
3.
Optimized spatial normalization was applied to ensure optimal alignment. Detailed description of the normalization procedure is reported in Sasson et al. (2010) and described in Fig. 1. Briefly, an FA template was created, and the FA map of each subject was masked. The masked FA maps were normalized to the template using a 12-parameter affine transformation followed by non-linear transformations, with 1,176 parameters describing each deformation field. The same transformations were then applied to the ADC maps. The normalization procedure included smoothing of 3-mm full-width half maximum (FWHM) of the source image. A notable reduction in the standard deviation of the FA maps (Fig. 1e, g) as well as ADC maps (Fig. 1f, h) across all subjects (n = 52) when using the optimized normalization method (Fig. 1g, h) compared with the standard normalization method (Fig. 1e, f).
-
4.
In order to apply the random field theory (RFT) in the statistical analysis spatial smoothing was performed with a kernel at least three times the voxel size (8 mm).
Statistical analysis
Voxel-based analysis
VBA is a whole brain technique that enables the detection of regionally specific differences in brain tissue composition on a voxel-by-voxel basis (Ashburner and Friston 2000). In this work we used SPM (version 2, UCL, London, UK) to perform voxel-by-voxel correlation between the DTI indices and the cognitive factor scores (executive function, information processing speed, memory) controlling for age and motor function:
-
1.
Partial correlation was computed between the DTI indices (ADC and FA) and each factor score for all subjects. The partial correlation was controlled for age and motor function using the multiple regression routine in SPM with each of the factor scores as covariates, and age and motor ability as constants. The statistical threshold was set at p < 0.005 uncorrected. Motor function was assessed using inter-tap from the Finger Tapping test included in the computerized battery.
-
2.
A non-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) mask was applied: as age is related to brain atrophy, and to avoid partial volume bias in the statistical analysis, segmentation was performed on the T2 image (b = 0) of the normalized DTI scans of all the subjects. From the segmented images, only voxels containing gray matter (GM) or WM in all subjects were included, effectively masking out the CSF regions. Areas showing partial GM or WM volume—the ventricles and in the borders around the cortex—were masked out. After masking out the CSF, cortical gray matter regions which show larger standard deviations are eliminated (Fig. 1e–h, right column).
-
3.
The correlation analysis described above generated statistical parametric maps. False discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons was applied on the statistical parametric maps using an in-house software written in Matlab 7.3.0 (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).The statistical parametric maps (p values) are presented superimposed on a T1 image from a single subject to permit informative anatomical reference. Using the statistical parametric maps for each of the correlation tests, we report significant voxels (p < 0.05, FDR corrected).The anatomic location of the significant clusters was determined using the SPM Wake Forest University Pickatlas toolbox (Maldjian et al. 2003).
Results
Behavioral results
Significant correlations between age and cognitive performance were found. Reaction time (RT) outcome parameters contributing to the executive function factor score increased significantly with age (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001), (RT) parameters contributing to the information processing speed factor score also increased significantly with age (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001), and Accuracy scores contributing to the memory factor score decreased significantly with age (r = −0.69, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2).
Partial correlation of diffusion parameters with cognitive domains
Brain localization using DTI partial correlation analysis corrected for age and motor function differed for each of the three cognitive factor scores.
Positive partial correlation between the executive function factor score and ADC was found in left insular cortex, WM adjacent to left inferior frontal gyrus, left parietal and temporal parts of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). Negative partial correlation between the executive function factor score and FA was found in the left cingulum (Fig. 3; Table 2; p < 0.05, FDR corrected).
Positive partial correlation between the information processing speed factor score and ADC was found in corona radiata, left WM (ILF), and left cingulum. Negative partial correlation between the memory factor score and ADC was found mainly in temporal and frontal gray and white matter, including the right IFG (BA46), medial frontal gyrus (MFG), and WM adjacent to the hippocampus. Positive partial correlation between memory factor score and FA did not exceed the threshold for significance (see Fig. 5, and Table 2; p < 0.05, FDR corrected).
Negative partial correlation between the memory factor score and ADC was found mainly in temporal and frontal gray and white matter, including the right IFG (BA46), medial frontal gyrus (MFG), and WM adjacent to the hippocampus.
Discussion
The main finding of this study is that micro-structural parameters, measured by DTI, can characterize a cognitive domain using a broad battery of commonly used computerized neuropsychological tests. We focused on the following cognitive domains—executive function, information processing speed and memory. While executive function domain was correlated with DTI parameters in frontal white matter and in the SLF, information processing speed domain was correlated with DTI parameters in the cingulum, corona radiata, ILF, parietal white matter and in the thalamus, and memory domain was correlated in temporal and frontal gray matter and white matter regions, including the cingulate cortex and the hippocampus.
In the present study we found that correlations between cognitive performance and DTI indices were region-specific. The brain regions showing significant correlations are in line with the known localization of the cognitive tasks.
Micro-structural morphological correlates of the executive function domain
Executive function domain was correlated with ADC in left insular cortex, WM adjacent to inferior frontal gyrus, fronto-parietal parts of the SLF, and in temporal white matter.
Executive processes are implicated in complex cognition, such as novel problem solving, which involve identifying and coordinating the steps to a new goal, evaluating the intermediate outcome, and modifying the plan as needed. Executive processes are also associated with task-set control, modifying behavior as appropriate in light of changes in the environment, and involve inhibition (Carpenter et al. 2000).
Lesion studies have demonstrated that the frontal lobe is crucial for executive functions (Rowe et al. 2001; Milner 1971; Drewe 1974; Perret 1974).
However, a meta-analysis of neuroimaging and lesion studies revealed that executive functions are sensitive, but not specific, to frontal lobe functioning, meaning, both frontal and non-frontal brain regions are necessary for intact executive functions (Alvarez and Emory 2006). Non-frontal brain regions include a variety of brain regions, e.g., the anterior cingulate cortex (Bench et al. 1993; Carter et al. 1995; Pardo et al. 1990; Posner and Dehaene 1994; Posner and Petersen 1990), parietal lobe regions (Bush et al. 1998; Carter et al. 1995; Leung et al. 2000; Peterson et al. 1999; Taylor et al. 1997), motor areas (Bush et al. 1998; Pardo et al. 1990; Peterson et al. 1999), and temporal lobe regions (Bush et al. 1998; Carter et al. 1995; Leung et al. 2000; Pardo et al. 1990). DTI studies demonstrated a negative correlation between RT in an executive function task (task switching) and FA in left frontoparietal WM in both young and older groups (Gold et al. 2008).
Decreased FA in the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes was associated with poorer cognitive performance in executive maze and in an attention-switching task (Grieve et al. 2007).
In DTI studies focusing on fiber tracking, it was shown that reduced integrity of specific fiber tracts are differentially correlated with declines in components of executive functions, including working memory, problem solving, categorical task switching, and Stroop color-word interference (Madden et al. 2009; Zahr et al. 2009; Sullivan et al. 2006). In cortical association fiber tracts, correlation was found with decrement in set-shifting performance observed with age (Perry et al. 2009).
A strong significant correlation with the executive function factor score was also found in the SLF. Historically, SLF or the arcuate fasciculus (AF) has been central to the neural underpinnings of higher brain function generally and for language and language disorders in particular (Geschwind 1965a, b; Heilman et al. 1970; Lichtheim 1885; Tanabe et al. 1987). This may be relevant to the Stroop interference outcome parameters contributing to the executive function factor, as they rely upon interference between semantic and visual input.
Micro-structural morphological correlates of the information processing speed domain
The information processing speed factor score (as measured by RTs for several rates of presentation in a simple arithmetic task) was significantly correlated with DTI parameters in WM of the corona radiata, in occipital ILF, and in the medial thalamus, as well as WM adjacent to the precuneus in the parietal lobe. Information processing speed represents the response time for a relatively simple cognitive task that is time limited (Salthouse 2000). An example of information processing speed task can be simple arithmetic, known to be subserved mainly by the parietal lobe, and more specifically the precuneus (Rocha et al. 2005; Cavanna and Trimble 2006). The correlations found in the corona radiata, a fiber bundle related to motor function, may be related to the motor response, although, as above, analysis were corrected for motor ability (as measured by finger tapping inter-tap interval using the same input device as for the other tasks). In addition, thalamic and occipital regions showed a significant correlation between information processing and DTI parameters. In some fMRI and PET studies of mental calculation, significant activation was found in the medial thalamus and in occipital regions (e.g., (Grabner et al. 2007; Cowell et al. 2000); in other studies, a role was found for occipital regions in arithmetic, including the lingual gyrus and fusiform gyrus (Rickard et al. 2000; Dehaene et al. 1996). DTI studies found that higher average fractional anisotropy (FA) in left occipitotemporal junction was found in children trained in mental calculation (Hu et al. 2011) and that FA in the left superior corona radiata was correlated with fMRI activation in the left angular gyrus during calculation (van Eimeren et al. 2010).
Micro-structural morphological correlates of the memory domain
The memory factor score was significantly correlated with ADC in frontal gray matter, in inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and anterior cingulate, as well as in temporal gray matter, including the parahippocampus and middle temporal lobe. This pattern is in line with the role of frontal and temporal regions in memory performance (Thompson and Kim 1996). Indeed, the frontal lobe is known to be essential in visual memory as demonstrated by lesion (Bauer and Fuster 1976; Funahashi et al. 1993) and functional imaging studies (D’Esposito et al. 1998; Swartz et al. 1995).
Lesion studies have substantiated the role of the parahippocampus in memory performance (Scoville and Milner 1957; Frankland and Bontempi 2005). Functional imaging studies, using PET and fMRI, have also found activation of parahippocampus during consolidation of new memories and retrieval of recently learned items. (Cabeza and Nyberg 2000; Henke et al. 1999; Constable et al. 2000; Davachi and Wagner 2002; Duzel et al. 2003; Giovanello et al. 2004; Henson 2005).
Several DTI studies focusing on memory performance showed that performance on working memory tasks correlates with whole brain FA and ADC indices (Charlton et al. 2006) and that elderly subjects with impaired memory performance showed differences in DTI measures of anterior white matter and reduced hippocampal volume compared with subjects with preserved memory performance (Persson et al. 2006). In a longitudinal study, manual tracing of hippocampal volume showed significant reduction in those older adults with a declining memory performance as did DTI-measured FA in the anterior corpus callosum. Mean DTI measures in the anterior corpus callosum correlated negatively with activation in right prefrontal cortex during a memory task (Persson et al. 2006).
Micro-structural morphological correlates of ADC compared with morphological correlates of FA
In the present paper the structural correlates of cognitive domains show different localization between FA and ADC. FA and ADC are sensitive to different structural tissue characteristics. Higher FA values may indicate higher tissue directionality and organization, and lower ADC values may indicate higher tissue density in gray and white matter (Blumenfeld-Katzir et al. 2011; Gouw et al. 2008).
Limitations of the voxel-based correlation approach
VBA performed in the present study makes several important assumptions. The first step in VBA analysis is spatial normalization to a template. However, it has been argued that imperfect registration of the brain maps might bias the results (Bookstein 2001). To address this problem, we performed optimized spatial normalization, based on the FA maps, which are less sensitive to volumetric differences between brains compared with normalization based on T2 (b = 0) maps. FA reflects fine anatomical structures, while T2 maps have a strong CSF signal which reflects more gross anatomical structures. Thus, better registration of white matter structures can also be obtained with FA.
Second, it is assumed that the relationship between the tested parameters (age, memory and DTI indices) is linear. Indeed, in the behavioral findings in the present study, several of the oldest subjects showed substantially higher reaction times/lower accuracy than all other participants (Fig. 2). This is in line with some studies reporting that age-related memory decline is curve-linear, with a more rapid decline at older ages (Schaie 1996; Hultsch 1998). It is also suggested by some studies that age-related volume reduction is not homogeneous in the brain, decreasing in a linear fashion in some regions and exhibiting a quadratic or cubic decrease when regressed against age in other regions (Walhovd et al. 2005). This issue is addressed in the present study in a discussion of the relationship between cognitive performance, age and DTI indices.
Conclusions
This study used inter-subject variability to correlate performance in three different cognitive domains—executive function, information processing speed, and memory, with DTI indices. The neurobiological correlates of the DTI indices with cognitive functions are specific to each cognitive domain and consistent with previous knowledge on the localization of these cognitive functions. To that end, tissue morphology, as expressed by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging and inter-subject variability in cognitive function can be used for localization of cognitive domains and to provide converging evidence for functional localization techniques.
References
Alvarez JA, Emory E (2006) Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychol Rev 16(1):17–42. doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x
Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2000) Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. Neuroimage 11(6 Pt 1):805–821
Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C (1998) A simplified method to measure the diffusion tensor from seven MR images. Magn Reson Med 39(6):928–934
Bauer RH, Fuster JM (1976) Delayed-matching and delayed-response deficit from cooling dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 90(3):293–302
Bench CJ, Frith CD, Grasby PM, Friston KJ, Paulesu E, Frackowiak RS, Dolan RJ (1993) Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia 31(9):907–922. ppi: 0028-3932(93)90147-R
Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Pasternak O, Dagan M, Assaf Y (2011) Diffusion MRI of structural brain plasticity induced by a learning and memory task. PLoS One 6(6):e20678. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020678
Bookstein FL (2001) “Voxel-based morphometry” should not be used with imperfectly registered images. Neuroimage 14(6):1454–1462. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0770
Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, McInerney SC, Rauch SL (1998) The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 6(4):270–282. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<270:AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-0
Cabeza R, Nyberg L (2000) Imaging cognition ii: an empirical review of 275 pet and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci 12(1):1–47
Carpenter PA, Just MA, Reichle ED (2000) Working memory and executive function: evidence from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10(2):195–199. pii: S0959-4388(00)00074-X
Carter CS, Mintun M, Cohen JD (1995) Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An h215o pet study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage 2(4):264–272. doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1034
Cavanna AE, Trimble MR (2006) The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129(Pt 3):564–583. doi:10.1093/brain/awl004
Charlton RA, Barrick TR, McIntyre DJ, Shen Y, O’Sullivan M, Howe FA, Clark CA, Morris RG, Markus HS (2006) White matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging correlates with age-related cognitive decline. Neurology 66(2):217–222
Constable RT, Carpentier A, Pugh K, Westerveld M, Oszunar Y, Spencer DD (2000) Investigation of the human hippocampal formation using a randomized event-related paradigm and z-shimmed functional MRI. Neuroimage 12(1):55–62. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0583
Cowell SF, Egan GF, Code C, Harasty J, Watson JD (2000) The functional neuroanatomy of simple calculation and number repetition: a parametric pet activation study. Neuroimage 12(5):565–573
Craik FI, Byrd M, Swanson JM (1987) Patterns of memory loss in three elderly samples. Psychol Aging 2(1):79–86
Davachi L, Wagner AD (2002) Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: insights from relational and item-based learning. J Neurophysiol 88(2):982–990
Dehaene S, Tzourio N, Frak V, Raynaud L, Cohen L, Mehler J, Mazoyer B (1996) Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: a pet study. Neuropsychologia 34(11):1097–1106
D’Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, Ballard D, Shin RK, Lease J (1998) Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 7(1):1–13. pii: S0926-6410(98)00004-4
Drewe EA (1974) The effect of type and area of brain lesion on wisconsin card sorting test performance. Cortex 10(2):159–170
Duzel E, Habib R, Rotte M, Guderian S, Tulving E, Heinze HJ (2003) Human hippocampal and parahippocampal activity during visual associative recognition memory for spatial and nonspatial stimulus configurations. J Neurosci 23(28):9439–9444. pii: 23/28/9439
Dwolatzky T, Whitehead V, Doniger GM, Simon ES, Schweiger A, Jaffe D, Chertkow H (2003) Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr 3:4
Forstmann BU, Jahfari S, Scholte HS, Wolfensteller U, van den Wildenberg WP, Ridderinkhof KR (2008) Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: a model-based approach. J Neurosci 28(39):9790–9796. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1465-08.2008
Frankland PW, Bontempi B (2005) The organization of recent and remote memories. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(2):119–130. doi:10.1038/nrn1607
Funahashi S, Bruce CJ, Goldman-Rakic PS (1989) Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey’s dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 61(2):331–349
Funahashi S, Bruce CJ, Goldman-Rakic PS (1993) Dorsolateral prefrontal lesions and oculomotor delayed-response performance: evidence for mnemonic “Scotomas”. J Neurosci 13(4):1479–1497
Geschwind N (1965a) Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man I. Brain 88(2):237–294
Geschwind N (1965b) Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man Ii. Brain 88(3):585–644
Giovanello KS, Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M (2004) A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: Evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition. Hippocampus 14(1):5–8. doi:10.1002/hipo.10182
Gold BT, Powell DK, Xuan L, Jicha GA, Smith CD (2008) Age-related slowing of task switching is associated with decreased integrity of frontoparietal white matter. Neurobiol Aging 31(3):512–522. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.005
Gouw AA, Seewann A, Vrenken H, van der Flier WM, Rozemuller JM, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Geurts JJ (2008) Heterogeneity of white matter hyperintensities in alzheimer’s disease: post-mortem quantitative MRI and neuropathology. Brain 131(Pt 12):3286–3298. doi:10.1093/brain/awn265
Grabner RH, Ansari D, Reishofer G, Stern E, Ebner F, Neuper C (2007) Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation. Neuroimage 38(2):346–356
Grieve SM, Williams LM, Paul RH, Clark CR, Gordon E (2007) Cognitive aging, executive function, and fractional anisotropy: a diffusion tensor mr imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(2):226–235. pii: 28/2/226
Heilman KM, Pandya DN, Geschwind N (1970) Trimodal inattention following parietal lobe ablations. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 95:259–261
Henke K, Weber B, Kneifel S, Wieser HG, Buck A (1999) Human hippocampus associates information in memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(10):5884–5889
Henson R (2005) A mini-review of fMRI studies of human medial temporal lobe activity associated with recognition memory. Q J Exp Psychol B 58(3–4):340–360
Hu Y, Geng F, Tao L, Hu N, Du F, Fu K, Chen F (2011) Enhanced white matter tracts integrity in children with abacus training. Hum Brain Mapp 32(1):10–21
Hultsch DF (1998) Memory change in the aged. Cambridge University Press, New York
Klingberg T, Hedehus M, Temple E, Salz T, Gabrieli JD, Moseley ME, Poldrack RA (2000) Microstructure of temporo-parietal white matter as a basis for reading ability: evidence from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuron 25(2):493–500. pii: S0896-6273(00)80911-3
Leung HC, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Peterson BS, Gore JC (2000) An event-related functional MRI study of the Stroop color word interference task. Cereb Cortex 10(6):552–560
Lichtheim L (1885) On aphasia. Brain 7:433–484
Madden DJ, Whiting WL, Huettel SA, White LE, MacFall JR, Provenzale JM (2004) Diffusion tensor imaging of adult age differences in cerebral white matter: relation to response time. Neuroimage 21(3):1174–1181. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.004
Madden DJ, Spaniol J, Costello MC, Bucur B, White LE, Cabeza R, Davis SW, Dennis NA, Provenzale JM, Huettel SA (2009) Cerebral white matter integrity mediates adult age differences in cognitive performance. J Cogn Neurosci 21(2):289–302
Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH (2003) An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 19(3):1233–1239
Milner B (1971) Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. Br Med Bull 27(3):272–277
Pardo JV, Pardo PJ, Janer KW, Raichle ME (1990) The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87(1):256–259
Perret E (1974) The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia 12(3):323–330
Perry ME, McDonald CR, Hagler DJ Jr, Gharapetian L, Kuperman JM, Koyama AK, Dale AM, McEvoy LK (2009) White matter tracts associated with set-shifting in healthy aging. Neuropsychologia 47(13):2835–2842
Persson J, Nyberg L, Lind J, Larsson A, Nilsson LG, Ingvar M, Buckner RL (2006) Structure-function correlates of cognitive decline in aging. Cereb Cortex 16(7):907–915
Petersen RC, Smith G, Kokmen E, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG (1992) Memory function in normal aging. Neurology 42(2):396–401
Peterson BS, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Zhang H, Anderson AW, Gore JC (1999) An fMRI study of Stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems. Biol Psychiatry 45(10):1237–1258. pii: S0006-3223(99)00056-6
Posner MI, Dehaene S (1994) Attentional networks. Trends Neurosci 17(2):75–79
Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990) The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 13:25–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
Rickard TC, Romero SG, Basso G, Wharton C, Flitman S, Grafman J (2000) The calculating brain: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 38(3):325–335
Rocha FT, Rocha AF, Massad E, Menezes R (2005) Brain mappings of the arithmetic processing in children and adults. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 22(3):359–372. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.008
Rowe AD, Bullock PR, Polkey CE, Morris RG (2001) “Theory of mind” Impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain 124(Pt 3):600–616
Salthouse TA (2000) Aging and measures of processing speed. Biol Psychol 54(1–3):35–54. pii: S0301051100000521
Sasson E, Doniger GM, Pasternak O, Assaf Y (2010) Structural correlates of memory performance with diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 50(3):1231–1242. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.079
Schaie KW (1996) Intellectual development in adulthood: the seattle longitudinal study. Cambridge University Press, New York
Scoville WB, Milner B (1957) Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20(1):11–21
Small SA (2001) Age-related memory decline: current concepts and future directions. Arch Neurol 58(3):360–364
Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E, Pfefferbaum A (2006) Selective age-related degradation of anterior callosal fiber bundles quantified in vivo with fiber tracking. Cereb Cortex 16(7):1030–1039
Swartz BE, Halgren E, Fuster JM, Simpkins E, Gee M, Mandelkern M (1995) Cortical metabolic activation in humans during a visual memory task. Cereb Cortex 5(3):205–214
Tanabe H, Sawada T, Inoue N, Ogawa M, Kuriyama Y, Shiraishi J (1987) Conduction aphasia and arcuate fasciculus. Acta Neurol Scand 76(6):422–427
Taylor SF, Kornblum S, Lauber EJ, Minoshima S, Koeppe RA (1997) Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: pet activation studies. Neuroimage 6(2):81–92. doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0285
Thompson RF, Kim JJ (1996) Memory systems in the brain and localization of a memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(24):13438–13444
Tuch DS, Salat DH, Wisco JJ, Zaleta AK, Hevelone ND, Rosas HD (2005) Choice reaction time performance correlates with diffusion anisotropy in white matter pathways supporting visuospatial attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(34):12212–12217. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407259102
van Eimeren L, Grabner RH, Koschutnig K, Reishofer G, Ebner F, Ansari D (2010) Structure-function relationships underlying calculation: a combined diffusion tensor imaging and fMRI study. Neuroimage 52(1):358–363. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.001
Walhovd KB, Fjell AM, Reinvang I, Lundervold A, Dale AM, Eilertsen DE, Quinn BT, Salat D, Makris N, Fischl B (2005) Effects of age on volumes of cortex, white matter and subcortical structures. Neurobiol Aging 26(9):1261–1270 (discussion 1275–1268)
Youngjohn JR, Crook TH 3rd (1993) Learning, forgetting, and retrieval of everyday material across the adult life span. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 15(4):447–460
Zahr NM, Rohlfing T, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV (2009) Problem solving, working memory, and motor correlates of association and commissural fiber bundles in normal aging: a quantitative fiber tracking study. Neuroimage 44(3):1050–1062
Acknowledgments
Y.A. wishes to thank the Israel Science Foundation (ISF grant no. 994/08) and the BIRAX program of the British council for grant support. The Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) program of the ICT - EU FP7 framework fund the CONNECT consortium (http://www.brain-connect.eu), which supports this work.
E.S. wishes to thank the Myers-JDC-Brookdale institute of gerontology and human development, and Eshel - The association for the planning and development of services for the aged in Israel, for grant support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sasson, E., Doniger, G.M., Pasternak, O. et al. Structural correlates of cognitive domains in normal aging with diffusion tensor imaging. Brain Struct Funct 217, 503–515 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-011-0344-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-011-0344-7