Abstract
Natural sounds often exhibit correlated amplitude modulations at different frequency regions, so-called comodulation. Therefore, the ear might be especially adapted to these kinds of sounds. Two effects have been related to the sensitivity of the auditory system to common modulations across frequency: comodulation detection difference (CDD) and comodulation masking release (CMR). Research on these effects has been done on the psychophysical and on the neurophysiological level in humans and other animals. Until now, models have focused only on one of the effects. In the present study, a simple model based on data from neuronal recordings obtained during CDD experiments with starlings is discussed. This model demonstrates that simple peripheral processing in the ear can go a substantial way to explaining psychophysical signal detection thresholds in response to CDD and CMR stimuli. Moreover, it is largely analytically tractable. The model is based on peripheral processing and incorporates the basic steps frequency filtering, envelope extraction, and compression. Signal detection is performed based on changes in the mean compressed envelope of the filtered stimulus. Comparing the results of the model with data from the literature, the scope of this unifying approach to CDD and CMR is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
(2003). Compression: from Cochlea to Cochlear Implants. Springer, New York
Bee MA, Buschermöhle M and Klump GM (2007). Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: II. Neural thresholds in the songbird forebrain. Eur J Neurosci 26(7): 1979–1994
Borrill SJ and Moore BCJ (2002). Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms. J Acoust Soc Am 111(1): 309–319
Buschermöhle M, Feudel U, Klump GM, Bee MA and Freund JA (2006). Signal detection enhanced by comodulated noise. Fluct Noise Lett 6(4): L339–L347
Cohen MF (1991). Comodulation masking release over a three octave range. J Acoust Soc Am 90(3): 1381–1384
Cohen MF and Schubert ED (1987). The effect of cross-spectrum correlation on the detectability of a noise band. J Acoust Soc Am 81: 721–723
Dau T, Kollmeier B and Kohlrausch A (1997). Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 102(5): 2892–2905
Ernst S and Verhey JL (2005). Comodulation masking release over a three octave range. Acta Acust United Ac 91: 998–1006
Ernst SMA and Verhey JL (2006). Role of suppression and retro-cochlear processes in comodulation masking release. J Acoust Soc Am 120(6): 3843–3852
Fantini DA and Moore BCJ (1994). Profile analysis and comodulation detection differences using narrow bands of noise and their relation to comodulation masking release. J Acoust Soc Am 95(4): 2180–2191
Gabor D (1946). Theory of communication. J IEE (London) 93: 429–457
Glasberg BR and Moore BCJ (1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 47: 103–138
Green DM and Swets JA (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York
Griffiths TD and Warren JD (2004). What is an auditory object?. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 887–892
Hall JW, Haggard MP and Fernandes MA (1984). Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 76(1): 50–56
Hall JW, Buss E and Grose JH (2006). Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 119(2): 1021–1028
Hofer SB and Klump GM (2003). Within- and across-channel processing in auditory masking: a physiological study in the songbird forebrain. J Neurosci 23(13): 5732–5739
Hohmann V (2002). Frequency analysis and synthesis using a gammatone filterbank. Acta Acust United Ac 88: 433–442
Joris PX, Schreiner CE and Rees A (2004). Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol Rev 84(2): 541–577
Klump GM and Nieder A (2001). Release from masking in fluctuating background noise in a songbird’s auditory forebrain. NeuroReport 12(9): 1825–1829
Köppl C and Yates G (1999). Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl’s auditory nerve. J Neurosci 19(21): 9674–9686
Langemann U and Klump GM (2001). Signal detection in amplitude-modulated maskers. I. Behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird. Eur J Neurosci 13: 1025–1032
Las L, Stern EA and Nelken I (2005). Representation of tone in fluctuating maskers in the ascending auditory system. J Neurosci 25(6): 1503–1513
Lawson JL and Uhlenbeck GE (1950). Threshold signals. McGraw-Hill, New York
McFadden D (1987). Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signals. J Acoust Soc Am 81(5): 1519–1527
Meddis R, Delahaye R, O’Mard L, Sumner C, Fantini DA, Winter I and Pressnitzer D (2002). A model of signal processing in the cochlear nucleus: comodulation masking release. Acta Acust United Ac 88(3): 387–398
Moore BCJ and Borrill SJ (2002). Tests of a within-channel account of comodulation detection differences. J Acoust Soc Am 112(5): 2099–2109
Moore BCJ and Shailer MJ (1991). Comodulation masking release as a function of level. J Acoust Soc Am 90(2): 829–835
Nelken I, Rotman Y and Yosef OB (1999). Response of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds. Nature 397: 154–157
Neuert V, Verhey JL and Winter IM (2004). Responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in the presence of modulated maskers. J Neurosci 24(25): 5789–5797
O’Loughlin BJ and Moore BCJ (1981). Off-frequency listening: effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 69(4): 1119–1125
Patterson RD and Nimmo-Smith I (1980). Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am 67(1): 229–245
Pressnitzer D, Meddis R, Delahaye R and Winter IM (2001). Physiological correlates of comodulation masking release in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci 21(16): 6377–6386
Saunders JC, Ventetuolo CE, Plontke SKR and Weiss BA (2002). Coding of sound intensity in the chick cochlear nerve. J Neurophysiol 88: 2887–2898
Schooneveldt GP and Moore BCJ (1987). Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. J Acoust Soc Am 82(6): 1944–1956
Schreiner CE and Urbas JV (1988). Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields. Hear Res 32(1): 49–63
Singh NC and Theunissen FE (2003). Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing. J Acoust Soc Am 114(6): 3394–3411
Kohlrausch A and van de Par S (1998). Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied noise maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 103(4): 2100–2110
Verhey JL, Dau T and Kollmeier B (1999). Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model. J Acoust Soc Am 106(5): 2733–2745
Verhey JL, Pressnitzer D and Winter IM (2003). The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release. Exp Brain Res 153: 405–417
Verhey JL, Rennies J, Ernst SMA (2007) Influence of envelope distributions on signal detection. Acta Acust United Ac 93(1):115–121
Weisstein EW (2002) CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
Wright BA (1990). Comodulation detection differences with multiple signal bands. J Acoust Soc Am 87(1): 292–303
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buschermöhle, M., Verhey, J.L., Feudel, U. et al. The role of the auditory periphery in comodulation detection difference and comodulation masking release. Biol Cybern 97, 397–411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0179-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0179-8