Abstract
Background
Multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently gives rise to depressive and anxiety symptoms, but these are often undertreated. This study investigated the effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CRT) on psychological outcomes and quality of life (QoL), and whether they mediate treatment effects on MS-related cognitive problems.
Methods
This randomized controlled trial included MS patients with cognitive complaints (n = 99) and compared MBCT (n = 32) and CRT (n = 32) to enhanced treatment as usual (n = 35). Baseline, post-treatment and 6-months follow-up assessments included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and cognitive outcomes (self-reported and neuropsychological assessment). PROMS concerned psychological symptoms, well-being, QoL, and daily life function. Linear mixed models indicated intervention effects on PROMS and mediation effects of PROMS on cognitive outcomes.
Results
MBCT positively affected depressive symptoms (Cohen’s d (d) = −0.46), fatigue (d = −0.39), brooding (d = −0.34), mindfulness skills (d = 0.49), and mental QoL (d = −0.73) at post-treatment. Effects on mindfulness skills remained significant 6 months later (d = 0.42). CRT positively affected depressive symptoms (d = −0.46), mindfulness skills (d = 0.37), and mental QoL (d = −0.45) at post-treatment, but not at 6-month follow-up. No effects on anxiety, well-being, self-compassion, physical QoL, and daily life function were found. Treatment effects on self-reported, but not objective, cognition were mediated by psychological symptoms and mindfulness skills.
Conclusions
MBCT and CRT reduced a wide array of psychological symptoms and improved mental QoL. These improvements seemed to impact self-reported cognitive problems after both treatments, whereas objective cognitive improvements after MBCT seemed independent of improvement in psychological symptoms. Future studies should investigate long-term sustainability of these beneficial effects.
Trial registration
The trial was prospectively registered in the Dutch Trial registry on 31 May 2017 (NL6285; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR6459).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most frequent demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system in young adults [1]. Due to the unpredictable nature of symptoms in MS in terms of their frequency, severity, and trajectory, comorbid psychological symptoms are often present [2]. Patients report a significantly higher prevalence of severe fatigue [3], cognitive complaints [4], and clinical depression [5] compared to the general population [6]. This frequently leads to a reduced quality of life (QoL) [7] and poorer adherence to disease-modifying therapies [8]. To manage these psychological symptoms, it is particularly important for treatment effects to impact on multiple psychological symptoms, given their complex interrelationship [9].
Recent advances in the field have shown promising effects of mindfulness-based interventions on psychological symptoms in MS patients [10], especially with regard to depressive symptoms [11], fatigue [12], and QoL [13]. Preliminary beneficial effects have also been reported for cognition [14]. With mindfulness-based interventions, the goal is to increase awareness of the present moment, which is suggested to help the patient to respond more attentively to disease-related challenges [11]. As for cognition, it is unclear whether the preliminary effects on cognitive impairments and self-reported cognitive complaints are a result of improvements in psychological symptoms [14], given their interrelationship [9], or whether mindfulness is able to affect cognition independently. Importantly, cognitively impaired patients were mostly excluded from previous studies [13], but given the high prevalence of cognitive impairment in MS (up to 65%) [15], it is essential to include them in investigating whether mindfulness-based interventions are effective in reducing psychological symptoms.
Another promising intervention is cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CRT), targeted at the compensation of cognitive impairments (i.e., through the use of strategies) or restoring cognitive functions [16, 17]. In particular with compensatory CRT, where the aim is to improve patients’ function in daily life, it may be expected that cognitive effects could coincide with improvements in psychological symptoms. However, previous studies mainly focused on objective cognitive test results and rarely took other psychological outcomes into account, although there were some indications that QoL could be improved [18,19,20]. The few studies that investigated depressive symptoms after CRT have yielded mixed results [18,19,20].
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to establish the effectiveness of both mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and compensatory CRT on psychological symptoms, QoL, well-being, and daily life function in MS patients with cognitive complaints. Hence, we compared the REMIND-MS cohort [i.e., a longitudinal, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a control group that received enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU)] [21]. The outcome measures entailed the secondary outcome measures of the REMIND-MS trial [21]. The effects on the primary outcome measure, i.e., the level of self-reported cognitive complaints, and objective cognition have been reported before [14]. Secondly, we addressed the interrelationship between treatment effects on psychological symptoms and the previously published positive effects on cognitive problems [14], including self-reported cognitive complaints, personalized cognitive goals, and information processing speed (i.e., the most affected cognitive function in MS) [4].
Methods
Participants and study design
The REMIND-MS study is a longitudinal dual-center, single-blind RCT with three parallel groups: MBCT, CRT and ETAU. A detailed overview of the study protocol, full eligibility criteria, and randomization procedure has been published elsewhere [14, 21]. In short, study measurements included a baseline, post-treatment and 6-month follow-up assessment, collected between December 2017 and November 2020 (see Fig. 1 for the flowchart of the study design). Following baseline assessment, random allocation was performed per treatment location (i.e., Amsterdam MS Center and Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center Arnhem) to MBCT, CRT, or ETAU (blocks varied between 6 and 9; 1:1:1 ratio), and assessors were blind to treatment allocation. Inclusion criteria included (1) verified MS diagnosis (McDonald 2010 criteria) [22], (2) 18–65 years of age, (3) cognitive complaints (scoring ≥ 23 on the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Questionnaire-Patient version (MSNQ-P) [23], and (4) no previous experience with the interventions.
Medical ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics review board of the Amsterdam UMC (2017.009). All patients provided written informed consent prior to inclusion. The procedures in this study comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Interventions
In this RCT, the control group (ETAU) had an appointment with an MS specialist nurse, focused on psychoeducation (with the same information as given during MBCT and CRT). MBCT entailed a standard 8-week MBCT protocol, performed during nine weeks (i.e., eight weekly 2.5-h sessions, and a 5-h silent retreat performed in a separate week). During MBCT, patients were trained to self-regulate their attention and to be aware of moment-to-moment experiences (e.g., emotions, thoughts, and behaviors) in a non-judgmental manner [24]. CRT also lasted nine weeks, including nine weekly 2.5-h sessions. This treatment focused on the learning and application of compensatory strategies to problems in processing speed [25], memory [26], executive function [27], and mental fatigue [28]. It also addressed emotional and behavioral changes and grief resolution. MBCT and CRT were group-based treatments (MBCT 4–7 patients, CRT 3–6 patients). Patients received meditation exercises (for MBCT) and homework assignments (for CRT) lasting 30–45 min/day for 6 days/week. Patient’s adherence was documented, and therapists’ competence and protocol adherence were evaluated based on video and audio recordings of MBCT and CRT sessions, respectively [29].
Patient-reported outcome measures
Information on demographics and disease-related characteristics (e.g., type of MS and disease duration) were collected at baseline. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) reported hereafter were collected at all measurement points.
Psychological symptoms
Symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [30]. The level of fatigue was assessed with the Fatigue severity subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20) [31]. The tendency to ruminate when being sad or depressed was measured with the ‘Brooding’ subscale of the Dutch Ruminative Response Scale (RRS-NL) [32].
Quality of life
Health-related QoL was measured with the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQoL-54) and included two subscales: the Physical Health Composite score (PHC) and the Mental Health Composite score (MHC) [33].
Daily life functioning
Participation in societal activities was measured with the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) [34].
Well-being
Emotional, psychological, and social well-being was measured using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) [35].
Mindfulness skills
The ability to be mindful, i.e., non-judgmental aware of moment-to-moment experiences, was assessed with the Five Facets of the Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form (FFMQ-SF) [36]. To measure self-compassion, i.e., the ability to act with compassion toward oneself in difficult times, the short form of the Self-Compassion Scale was used [37].
Cognitive outcomes
The level of self-reported cognitive complaints was measured with the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) [38] for daily cognitive problems and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) for everyday executive functioning (subscales behavioral regulation and metacognition) [39]. Two personalized goals for each patient were formulated at baseline using goal attainment scaling (GAS), on a 6-point Likert scale, addressing real-life challenges due to cognitive problems faced by the patients [40]. Objective cognitive function was measured using a neuropsychological assessment primarily based on the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS (MACFIMS) [41], while additionally including the Stroop Color-Word Test [42]. Based on the intervention effects analyzed previously [14], only the cognitive domain information processing speed was included in this study, which was constructed by a composite score of [14]: (1) the oral version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) [43] and (2) the Stroop Color-Word Test (cards I and II) [42]. Supplementary Table 1 details information on the included tests and construction of cognitive domains. To control for material-specific learning effects, alternate forms were administered for repeated measurements of the SDMT.
Power analysis
The REMIND-MS study was powered based on the CFQ (primary outcome), the results of which have been published previously [14, 21]. Considering an alpha of 0.05, power of 0.80, intra-class correlation of 0.06, and a medium effect size, a sample size of 33 patients per group was required. Accounting for potential dropouts, the intended sample size included 40 patients per group.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28, Stata 17, and R-Studio 4.2.1 [44]. Normality of the outcome variables and residuals of the models were assessed with histogram inspection. The MHC and HADS depression subscale were transformed using the square root and the natural logarithm, respectively, as these were positively skewed. Analyses were performed on a modified intention-to-treat sample, including all patients with at least one follow-up measurement. For all analyses, α-level was set at 0.05, or Bonferroni corrected for the number of subscales within a PROM analyzed in the primary analyses.
Linear mixed-model analyses were performed for all PROMS with time (i.e., post-treatment and 6-month follow-up) as within-subjects factor and treatment (i.e., MBCT vs. ETAU and CRT vs. ETAU) as between-subjects factor. A random intercept on subject-level was included to account for the dependency of repeated observations within patients. Treatment effects irrespective of time and at both post-treatment and 6-month follow-up (inserting group-by-time interactions; group estimates indicate intervention effects) were investigated in separate models for each PROM. Age, sex, and baseline levels of the outcome variable were included as covariates. By including the baseline measurement as a covariate, the model captures individual variability at the start of the study, thus controlling for initial individual differences and mitigating the effect of regression to the mean [45], an effect which can also occur in the ETAU group.
Secondly, we investigated whether the treatment effects on cognitive outcomes, previously published in our work [14], were mediated by treatment effects on PROMS, focusing particularly on psychological symptoms and mindfulness skills. For this purpose, we expanded the longitudinal mixed-effects models to incorporate longitudinal mediations effects [46]. We analyzed the time point for which the treatment had a significant effect on the cognitive outcome. For post-treatment effects, we included the potential mediator at post-treatment. For 6-month follow-up effects, we included the potential mediator at the same time point, and in a separate model also as a change score between baseline and post-treatment, thereby studying the order of events. The conditions of mediation were investigated [47]. In other words, all the pathways of the mediation model needed to be established: (1) the treatment should affect the cognitive outcome: for this, we repeated the linear mixed model analyses of the previous study (cognitive outcomes as dependent variables; baseline level of the outcomes, age, education, and sex as covariates) [14], while also adding the baseline level of the potential mediator; (2) the treatment should affect the potential mediator; therefore, we selected psychological and mindfulness skills outcomes that were significantly affected by the treatments; (3) the potential mediator and cognitive outcome should be related (see step 4 for the methods); and (4) the mediating effect was considered present if the first three conditions were met, and if the effect of the treatments on the cognitive outcome changed ≥ 10% when adding the mediator to the model. For the steps three and four, the same model as for the first step was performed, while including the change score of the potential mediator and the follow-up scores.
Results
The current study analyzed 99 patients, of which 32 were randomized into MBCT, 32 into CRT, and 35 into ETAU (see Fig. 1). Of these 99 patients, 74% were women and 64% had relapsing–remitting MS. Mean age of the group was 48.8 (± 9.6) years. Other demographic, disease-related, and psychological characteristics are included in Table 1. These variables did not differ between the treatment and control groups. Information on intervention adherence is reported elsewhere [14]. In short, median attendance was 8 out of 9 sessions for both MBCT and CRT, and the median homework completion was 63% for MBCT and 86% for CRT. MBCT therapists were considered beginner (n = 18 analyzed patients) and proficient (n = 14 analyzed patients), and CRT therapists proficient (n = 22 analyzed patients, of whom 1 did not start and 1 discontinued CRT, see Fig. 1) and advanced (n = 10 analyzed patients).
Treatment effects
Table 2 shows the intervention effects (raw scores can be found in Supplementary Table 2). Figure 2 shows only significant intervention effects. Both MBCT (β = −0.30, p = 0.006, Cohen’s d = −0.46) and CRT (β = −0.32, p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = −0.46) had a positive effect on depression at post-treatment compared to ETAU. MBCT also had a positive effect on fatigue (β = −4.31, p = 0.029, Cohen’s d = −0.39) and brooding (β = −1.01, p = 0.042, Cohen’s d = −0.34) at post-treatment. No effects were found on anxiety (p > 0.025). As to QoL, both MBCT (β = −1.16, p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = −0.73) and CRT (β = −0.79, p = 0.017, Cohen’s d = −0.45) had a positive effect on mental QoL at post-treatment. No effects on physical QoL were found. Mindfulness skills also improved after both MBCT (β = 5.70, p = 0.005, Cohen’s d = 0.49) and CRT (β = 4.50, p = 0.034, Cohen’s d = 0.37) at post-treatment, and this effect remained significant at 6-month follow-up after MBCT (β = 4.90, p = 0.017, Cohen’s d = 0.42). Post hoc analyses focusing on subscales of mindfulness skills showed positive effects at both time points on ‘describing’ after MBCT (p = 0.030 and p = 0.011, respectively) and CRT (p = 0.018 and p = 0.041, respectively). MBCT also had a positive effect on ‘observing’ at post-treatment (p = 0.003) and ‘acting with awareness’ at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.032). No effects on well-being (p > 0.05), self-compassion (p > 0.05), or daily life functioning were found (p > 0.017).
Mediation analyses
Significant outcomes for psychological symptoms or mindfulness skills per treatment were subsequently examined as potential mediators (Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 3) of the treatment effects on cognitive outcomes (cognitive outcomes were published previously). Positive effects of MBCT on self-reported executive functioning (BRIEF; metacognition and behavioral regulation) were partially mediated by depressive symptoms (∆β = 33.9%, ∆β = 32.7%, respectively), fatigue (∆β = 13.6%, ∆β = 12.1%, respectively), brooding (∆β = 19.9%, ∆β = 23.5%, respectively), and mindfulness skills (∆β = 53.5%, ∆β = 52.2%, respectively). All these mediators were related to the aforementioned cognitive outcome (p < 0.05; except for fatigue on BRIEF behavioral regulation). The positive effect of MBCT on information processing speed at 6-month follow-up was not mediated by depression, fatigue, or brooding (∆β < 10%; mediators p > 0.05), and although mindfulness skills did seem to reduce the treatment effect (∆β = 10.8%), they were not related to information processing speed (p = 0.600). Changes in these symptoms between baseline and post-treatment did not mediate this 6-month follow-up effect on information processing speed either (∆β < 10%, mediators p > 0.05).
As to the positive effect of CRT on self-reported general cognitive complaints (CFQ) and self-reported executive functioning (BRIEF; metacognition) at post-treatment, effects were partly mediated by depression (∆β = 43.0%, ∆β = 30.6%, respectively) and mindfulness skills (∆β = 28.9%, ∆β = 46.6%, respectively). All mediators were related to the cognitive outcomes (all p < 0.001). The effect of CRT on personalized cognitive goals at 6-month follow-up was partly mediated by mindfulness skills, both the level of mindfulness skills at 6-month follow-up (∆β = 22.1%; mediator p < 0.001) and the change between baseline and post-treatment (∆β = 28.2%; mediator p = 0.038). Depressive symptoms did not mediate this effect of depressive symptoms at 6-month follow-up: ∆β = 2%, mediator p = 0.204; change in depression between baseline and post-treatment: ∆β = 14.1%, mediator p = 0.854).
Discussion
In this RCT involving MS patients with cognitive complaints, two non-pharmacological interventions, i.e., MBCT and CRT, had a positive effect on psychological symptoms, mindfulness skills, and mental QoL compared to ETAU. The effect on mindfulness skills following MBCT was the only effect still present 6 months later. These effects on psychological symptoms and mindfulness skills mediated the treatment effects found on self-reported cognitive complaints in MS, but not on information processing speed.
Psychological symptoms are common in patients with MS, yet they are rarely targeted in treatment, despite their significant impact on patients’ QoL [7]. This study shows that MBCT reduced a wide variety of self-reported psychological symptoms directly following treatment completion, including depressive symptoms, fatigue and brooding, of which the latter is a central target of mindfulness interventions. These small-to-moderate effects are in accordance with previous mindfulness-based studies [13], but we extend these findings by revealing the feasibility and effectiveness of MBCT within a sample that encompasses cognitively impaired patients. Patients with cognitive impairments are generally not included in previous studies [13], whereas our sample included 57% of these patients. Notably, treatment effects on depressive symptoms [48] and fatigue [49] match the small-to-moderate effect sizes observed in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for MS. CBT is a widely used treatment that typically targets a single psychological symptom, particularly depressive complaints [48]. In contrast to previous studies [50], we did not find a reliable treatment effect of MCBT on anxiety, despite a small effect size (d = −0.36, p = 0.043). Importantly, MBCT showed moderate-to-large improvements in mental QoL immediately following treatment completion. These improvements are even larger compared to those reported in previous studies [13], highlighting the potential of mindfulness in addressing QoL in MS.
In addition to MBCT, CRT also positively affected depressive symptoms to the same level as MBCT, showing that a treatment primarily focusing on cognitive impairments can also affect psychological symptoms. Previous CRT studies focusing on psychological symptoms in MS are limited, and available results are mixed. For instance, an imagery-based memory training did not reduce psychological symptoms [19]. Conversely, interventions that are more similar to our approach, such as behavioral training with self-generated learning techniques [20] and interventions aimed at increasing awareness of cognitive strengths, limitations, and coping strategies [18], did lead to a reduction in depressive symptoms. Reliable effects of CRT on QoL have also not been established yet, although previous studies do suggest small improvements in QoL [18], positive effects on general contentment in daily life [19, 20], and more confidence in own abilities [51]. Building upon these preliminary findings, our study highlights that depressive symptoms and mental QoL can be moderately improved after compensatory CRT. For both MBCT and CRT, the post-treatment effects of psychological outcomes and QoL subsided 6 months after treatment completion, presumably due to less frequent practice of mindfulness exercises and application of cognitive strategies. A longer lasting intervention or booster sessions may contribute to the consolidation of these treatment effects [52].
We additionally investigated whether the treatment effects transferred to daily-life functioning. However, no significant effects were observed following either treatment. Research on the effects of MBCT and CRT on daily functioning in MS is currently lacking, but it has been argued that improving patient’ everyday life should be an fundamental objective of CRT [17]. Upon closer examination of the used measure (i.e., the USER-P), the lack of effect might be attributed to the scale’s potential inability to detect more subtle changes in patient’s daily life. This questionnaire has primarily been used within rehabilitation settings for patients with physical disabilities [34]. In the current study, average EDSS scores for both treatment groups were below four, indicating the absence of gait difficulties. This may imply that the sample could potentially exceed the scale’s sensitivity in detecting changes following intervention.
In contrast to the previously reported short-term effects on psychological symptoms and QoL, we showed a long-lasting increase of mindfulness skills after MBCT. This finding is promising, as it suggests the persistence of certain effects, although these enhanced mindfulness skills did not seem to transfer to long-term benefits in psychological functioning. Moreover, CRT had a positive effect on mindfulness skills immediately following treatment completion. Even though mindfulness exercises were not included in CRT, the treatment included a session on the handling of emotional and behavioral changes, which may explain this effect. Neither MBCT nor CRT had an impact on general well-being and self-compassion, despite the latter being an important aspect of MBCT. It is possible that self-compassion may require more specific training, as is offered in Mindfulness-Based Compassionate Living [53], to show improvements.
Interestingly, we found that treatment effects on self-reported cognitive complaints and cognitive goals were mediated by the reduction of psychological symptoms and an increase in mindfulness skills, whereas treatment effects on IPS were not mediated by these symptoms. This finding matches the previously reported discrepancy between self-reported cognitive problems versus objectively tested cognitive performance in MS patients, as psychological symptoms mainly relate to self-reported cognitive complaints and not to objective cognitive performance [54,55,56]. In the current study, we selected patients based on the presence of self-reported cognitive complaints, and indeed, a large proportion of patients also experienced severe fatigue (88%). This high level of fatigue in our sample also indicates that both MBCT and CRT are feasible in severely fatigued patients. Despite the relation between self-reported cognition and depressive symptoms [57], only 10% of patients in our sample experienced severe depressive symptoms. This illustrates that even in patients with below-threshold depressive symptoms, moderate reductions in depressive symptoms can be achieved after MBCT and CRT. It would be clinically relevant to investigate whether MS patients who have a clinical depression also benefit from these treatments. Notably, the reduction of depressive symptoms, combined with increased mindfulness skills, even showed the largest mediating effects (~ 30–50%) on self-reported cognitive function. However, it must be noted that these mediators were analyzed in a cross-sectional manner, and no conclusion regarding causality can be drawn. Regarding the 6-month follow-up effect on cognitive goals, our findings indicate that changes in mindfulness skills directly following CRT completion preceded the long-term benefits on personalized cognitive goals 6 months later. Combined, our results implicate that the effects of MBCT and CRT on self-reported cognitive function and psychological symptoms are interrelated, whereas the effect of MBCT on information processing speed seemed to be independent. The multi-dimensional effect of MBCT and CRT is clinically relevant, given that patients generally engage in multiple treatments at the same time (e.g., DMT, physiotherapy). It thus may be advantageous to target both psychosocial and cognitive problems simultaneously.
Several limitations of our study need to be considered. Both our treatments were group based, and we cannot rule out that several effects resulted from non-specific treatment characteristics, such as peer support. Future studies may benefit by including a group-based control condition. Still, the differential effect of MBCT and CRT on various factors (e.g., brooding and fatigue were only affected after MBCT), suggests the presence of treatment-specific effects. Secondly, patients could by definition not be blinded for treatment allocation, which, in combination with the self-reported outcomes, may have resulted in biased results. Another potential source of bias could have been the inclusion of patients with cognitive complaints. While it is promising that MBCT and CRT yield beneficial effects for these patients, it also raises the question to what extent these results generalize to patients without cognitive complaints. Lastly, the power of the REMIND-MS study was based on self-reported cognitive complaints (i.e., primary outcome REMIND-MS study) and not on the other PROMS analyzed in current study. Still, we were able to find both small and large treatments effects, indicating that the sample size was sufficient. It is noteworthy that most of the treatment effects found in the current study were even larger in size than the previously published effects on self-reported cognitive complaints [14].
To conclude, in MS patients with self-reported cognitive complaints, high levels of fatigue, and with more than 50% being cognitively impaired, MBCT reduced a wide array of psychological symptoms, including fatigue, depressive symptoms, and brooding, and led to improved mental QoL. Combined with its previously shown effect on information processing speed, which is the most affected cognitive domain in MS patients, mindfulness leads to significant benefits in MS. Likewise, compensatory CRT resulted in a reduction of depressive symptoms and improved mental QoL in the short-term, indicating that CRT is not solely a cognitive treatment but is also effective in improving psychosocial symptoms. For now, it is crucial to investigate how these beneficial effects can be maintained over a longer period of time. Considering the uncertainty of the MS disease course, combined with the large burden of symptoms and relatively young age of onset, consolidation of treatment effects by continuing support is of the utmost importance.
Data availability
Anonymized data, not published in the article, will be shared upon reasonable request from a qualified investigator.
References
Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O (2018) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 391(10130):1622–1636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1
Motl RW, McAuley E (2010) Symptom cluster and quality of life: preliminary evidence in multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs J Am Assoc Neurosci Nurses 42(4):212
Weiland TJ, Jelinek GA, Marck CH, Hadgkiss EJ, van der Meer DM, Pereira NG, Taylor KL (2015) Clinically significant fatigue: prevalence and associated factors in an international sample of adults with multiple sclerosis recruited via the internet. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0115541
Sumowski JF et al (2018) Cognition in multiple sclerosis: State of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology 90(6):278–288
Solaro C, Gamberini G, Masuccio FG (2018) Depression in multiple sclerosis: epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. CNS Drugs 32(2):117–133
Feinstein A, Magalhaes S, Richard J-F, Audet B, Moore C (2014) The link between multiple sclerosis and depression. Nat Rev Neurol 10(9):507–517
Karatepe AG, Kaya T, Günaydn R, Demirhan A, Ce P, Gedizlioglu M (2011) Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the impact of depression, fatigue, and disability. Int J Rehabil Res 34(4):290–298
Tarrants M, Oleen-Burkey M, Castelli-Haley J, Lage M (2011) The impact of comorbid depression on adherence to therapy for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int 2011:1–10
Kalb R et al (2018) Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care. Mult Scler J 24(13):1665–1680
Grossman P, Kappos L, Gensicke H, D’Souza M, Mohr DC, Penner IK, Steiner C (2010) MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: a randomized trial. Neurology 75(13):1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f4d80d
Simpson R, Booth J, Lawrence M, Byrne S, Mair F, Mercer S (2014) Mindfulness based interventions in multiple sclerosis—a systematic review. BMC Neurol 14(1):1–9
Hoogerwerf AE, Bol Y, Lobbestael J, Hupperts R, van Heugten CM (2017) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for severely fatigued multiple sclerosis patients: a waiting list controlled study. J Rehabil Med 49(6):497–504
Simpson R et al (2023) A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions on quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 270(2):726–745
Nauta IM et al (2023) Cognitive rehabilitation and mindfulness reduce cognitive complaints in multiple sclerosis (REMIND-MS): a randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler Relat Disord 71:104529
Benedict RHB, Amato MP, DeLuca J, Geurts JJG (2020) Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues. Lancet Neurol 19(10):860–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30277-5
Chen MH, Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J (2021) Neurological update: cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 268(12):4908–4914
DeLuca J, Chiaravalloti ND, Sandroff BM (2020) Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 16:319–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-020-0355-1
Hanssen KT, Beiske AG, Landro NI, Hofoss D, Hessen E (2016) Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Neurol Scand 133(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12420
Chiaravalloti ND, Moore NB, Nikelshpur OM, DeLuca J (2013) An RCT to treat learning impairment in multiple sclerosis: the MEMREHAB trial. Neurology 81(24):2066–2072
Goverover Y, Chiaravalloti N, Genova H, DeLuca J (2018) A randomized controlled trial to treat impaired learning and memory in multiple sclerosis: the self-GEN trial. Mult Scler J 24(8):1096–1104
Nauta IM et al (2017) Cognitive rehabilitation and mindfulness in multiple sclerosis (REMIND-MS): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol 17(1):1–10
Polman CH et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366
Benedict RH, Munschauer F, Linn R, Miller C, Murphy E, Foley F, Jacobs L (2003) Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire. Mult Scler J 9(1):95–101
Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD (2013) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York
Winkens I, Van Heugten CM, Wade DT, Fasotti L (2009) Training patients in time pressure management, a cognitive strategy for mental slowness. Clin Rehabil 23(1):79–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508097855
van Kessel M, Fasotti L, Berg I, van Hout M, Wekking E (2010) Training geheugenstrategieën. Boom Uitgevers, Amsterdam
Spikman JM, Boelen DH, Lamberts KF, Brouwer WH, Fasotti L (2010) Effects of a multifaceted treatment program for executive dysfunction after acquired brain injury on indications of executive functioning in daily life. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16(1):118–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709991020
Zedlitz AM, Rietveld TC, Geurts AC, Fasotti L (2012) Cognitive and graded activity training can alleviate persistent fatigue after stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 43(4):1046–1051. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632117
Crane RS, Kuyken W, Williams JMG, Hastings RP, Cooper L, Fennell MJ (2012) Competence in teaching mindfulness-based courses: concepts, development and assessment. Mindfulness 3:76–84
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370
Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G (1994) Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 38(5):383–392
Raes F, Hermans D, Eelen P (2003) Kort instrumenteel De Nederlandstalige versie van de Ruminative Response Scale (RRS-NL) en de Rumination on Sadness Scale (RSS-NL). Gedragstherapie 36:97–104
Vickrey B, Hays R, Harooni R, Myers L, Ellison G (1995) A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res 4(3):187–206
Post MW, van der Zee CH, Hennink J, Schafrat CG, Visser-Meily JM, van Berlekom SB (2012) Validity of the utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation. Disabil Rehabil 34(6):478–485
Lamers SM, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET, ten Klooster PM, Keyes CL (2011) Evaluating the psychometric properties of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF). J Clin Psychol 67(1):99–110
Bohlmeijer E, Ten Klooster PM, Fledderus M, Veehof M, Baer R (2011) Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment 18(3):308–320
Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D (2011) Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clin Psychol Psychother 18(3):250–255
Merckelbach H, Muris P, Nijman H, de Jong PJ (1996) Self-reported cognitive failures and neurotic symptomatology. Personality Individ Differ 20(6):715–724
Roth R, Isquith P, Gioia G, Widows M (2005) Development of the behavior rating inventory of executive function-adult version. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20(7):906–906
Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE (1968) Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Commun Ment Health J 4:443–453
Benedict RH, Cookfair D, Gavett R, Gunther M, Munschauer F, Garg N, Weinstock-Guttman B (2006) Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS). J Int Neuropsychol Soc JINS 12(4):549
Hammes J (1973) The STROOP color-word test: manual. Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam
Smith A (1982) Symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) manual (revised). Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles
R. I. D. E. f. R (2020) RStudio Team. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA
Twisk JW (2006) Applied multilevel analysis: a practical guide for medical researchers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rijnhart JJ, Twisk JW, Valente MJ, Heymans MW (2022) Time lags and time interactions in mixed effects models impacted longitudinal mediation effect estimates. J Clin Epidemiol 151:143–150
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173
Fiest KM et al (2016) Systematic review of interventions for depression and anxiety in persons with inflammatory bowel disease. BMC Res Notes 9(1):1–7
van den Akker LE et al (2017) Cognitive behavioral therapy positively affects fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler J 23(11):1542–1553
Simpson R, Simpson S, Ramparsad N, Lawrence M, Booth J, Mercer SW (2019) Mindfulness-based interventions for mental wellbeing among people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 90(9):1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-320165
Klein OA, Drummond A, Mhizha-Murira JR, Mansford L, dasNAIR R (2019) Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: a meta-synthesis of patient perspectives. Neuropsychol Rehabil 29(4):491–512
Simpson R, Simpson S, Wasilewski M, Mercer S, Lawrence M (2022) Mindfulness-based interventions for people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-aggregation of qualitative research studies. Disabil Rehabil 44(21):6179–6193
Van den Brink E, Koster F (2015) Mindfulness-based compassionate living. Routledge, London
Nauta IM, Balk LJ, Sonder JM, Hulst HE, Uitdehaag BM, Fasotti L, de Jong BA (2019) The clinical value of the patient-reported multiple sclerosis neuropsychological screening questionnaire. Mult Scler 25(11):1543–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518777295
Hughes AJ, Bhattarai JJ, Paul S, Beier M (2019) Depressive symptoms and fatigue as predictors of objective-subjective discrepancies in cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 30:192–197
Thomas GA, Riegler KE, Bradson ML, O’Shea DU, Arnett PA (2023) Subjective report, objective neurocognitive performance, and “invisible symptoms” in multiple sclerosis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 38(2):169–181
Davenport L et al (2022) Investigating the association of mood and fatigue with objective and subjective cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Neuropsychol 16(3):537–554
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the therapists for providing the treatment sessions. They would also like to thank the research assistants, researchers, and neuropsychologists in training of the Amsterdam UMC, Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam for their help with the data acquisition.
Funding
This investigator-initiated trial was funded by the Dutch MS Research Foundation (project number 15-911).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Ilse M. Nauta was supported by the Dutch MS Research Foundation (project number 15-911) and National MS Foundation. Maureen van Dam was supported by a research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dirk Bertens was partially supported by a grant from the Netherlands Brain Foundation (Hersenstichting, grant number DR-2019-00315). Roy P.C. Kessels is an associate editor for Neuropsychology Review, a member of the editorial board of the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, and the chair of the scientific advisory board of the Korsakoff Knowledge Center Netherlands (Korsakov Kenniscentrum). Dirk Bertens, Luciano Fasotti and Roy P.C. Kessels were partially supported by a grant from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/EFRO, grant number PROJ-00928). Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag reported research support and/or consultancy fees from Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Immunic Therapeutics. Anne E.M. Speckens is the founder clinical director of the Radboudumc Centre for Mindfulness reported receiving grants from the Dutch Cancer Society (Project number 12125), ZonMW Efficiency (Project number 843002803), and Lifestyle Medicine (Project number 555003201). Brigit A. de Jong reported receiving grants from Dutch MS Research Foundation (project number 15–911) and National MS Foundation. B.A. de Jong is a member of the medical advisory board of the Dutch MS Society, the chair of the committee for the revision of the guideline on disease-modifying therapy and MS for the Netherlands Society of Neurology, and the chair of the committee of the Dutch National MS registration of the Netherlands Society of Neurology.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nauta, I.M., van Dam, M., Bertens, D. et al. Improved quality of life and psychological symptoms following mindfulness and cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis and their mediating role for cognition: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol 271, 4361–4372 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12327-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12327-y