Abstract
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is a neurological syndrome determined by a rise in intracranial pressure without a detectable cause. Course and prognosis may be changeable, requiring a multidisciplinary approach for its diagnosis and management. Although its precise pathogenesis is still unknown, many studies have been carried out to define the possible causal and associated factors, such as retinoids, steroid hormones, body mass index and recent weight gains, cytokines and adipokines levels. The clinical presentation can be variable including chronic headache, disturbance of vision, diplopia and tinnitus. Even if papilloedema is considered the most specific sign, it could not be observed in more than 5% of patients during the evaluation of the fundus oculi. Neuroradiological signs acquire greater importance in patients who do not present papilloedema and may suggest the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Other assessments can be useful in the diagnostic process, such as optical coherence tomography, visual evoked potentials, ocular ultrasonography and fundus fluorescein angiography and autofluorescence. Nonetheless, cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurement is required to establish a definite diagnosis. Management may be different, since surgical procedures or lumbar punctures are often required when symptoms develop rapidly leading to a loss of visual function. Apart from these cases, patients can be treated with a pharmacological approach and low-calorie diet, but they also need to be monitored over time since relapses years later are not uncommon.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction and epidemiology
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a clinical condition characterized by an increase of intracranial pressure (ICP) in absence of any identifiable causal factor. This implies that any medical condition, venous abnormalities and drug intake or exposure which could cause a secondary development of intracranial hypertension must be excluded to define the diagnosis (Table 1). Incidence in general population is about 0.9/100.000/year in West countries, but it grows up to 3.5/100.000/year considering a female population ranging from 15 to 44 years. It is even greater if just those women aged 20–44 years exceeding ideal weight over 20% are considered, amounting to 19/100.000/year [1]. Interestingly, despite previous studies stated that no ethnical background exists, a lower incidence has been noted in Asian countries (0.03/100.000/year), interpreted as the result of the different worldwide prevalence of obesity, ten times greater in the USA in comparison to Asian states [2, 3]. It is quite clear from these data that female sex and obesity seem to be strongly associated with IIH. Prevalence in men has been estimated approximately at 9% of definite cases of IIH: such a gender difference does not exist in pre-pubertal timing, suggesting a possible role of sexual hormones in the determinism of the condition in women of child-bearing age. Like women, men suffering from IIH are mostly obese, but older at diagnosis with an average age of 37 years vs 28 years in women [4]. Furthermore, it is a rare disease in the elderly and in children under the age of 3 years, with an age-specific incidence which goes from 0.17/100.000 in patients aged 1–6 years to 0.75/100.000 in 7–11 years to 1.32/100.000 in 12–16 years [5].
Pathophysiology and associated factors
A dysregulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics is supposed to be involved in the pathophysiology of this condition, but the precise mechanism is still not known: it may involve hypersecretion of CSF at the choroid plexus, reduced reabsorption at the arachnoid granulations and abnormal venous pressure gradients. A lot of hypotheses have been formulated and lots of factors investigated as possibly associated.
As concerns obesity, increasing levels of body mass index (BMI) correlate with a major risk for this condition and with a more severe visual outcome. Even a mild weight gain between 5% and 15% in both obese and non-obese patients, especially if occurred within the 12 months prior to symptom onset, is associated with a greater risk of disease [6, 7]. Moreover, increases in BMI after IIH resolution are probably a risk factor for recurrence [8].
It has been supposed that a central body fat distribution may determine an increase in central venous pressure and consequently a raised venous ICP obstructing CSF reabsorption [9]. However, some studies have found a more prevalent lower body distribution of fat than abdominal one in obese women with IIH compared with same-aged obese women not suffering from the disease [10]. Another theory supports occult venous micro-thrombosis in obese patients as a causative factor for interruption in distal venous circulation, impeding CSF drainage with a similar mechanism. Moreover, elevated levels of fibrinogen, D-Dimer, factor VIII, factor IX and factor XI have been found in IIH obese patients compared with non-obese ones [11]. Finally, a neuroendocrine pathway could be considered, involving different cytokine and adipokine profiles in obese patients which may modulate CSF secretion. Some clinical studies have detected elevated levels of leptin in obese IIH patients, read as a sign of central leptin resistance. It has been supposed, thus, that chronic elevated levels of leptin can increase CSF secretion throughout an increased activity of NA+/K+ ATPase in the epithelium of choroid plexus [12].
The role of incretins in the homeostasis of CSF dynamics has been proved in rats [13] and has led to the formulation of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide, whose effects and safety are under investigation in the IIH Pressure Trial (ISRCTN12678718) [14]. Indeed, along with stimulating glucose-dependent insulin secretion and favoring weight loss, GLP-1 has proved to be involved in both renal and CSF homeostasis through the modulation of Na+ reabsorption, being, respectively, expressed in both renal proximal tubule and in human choroid plexus [15].
Since IIH is predominantly diagnosed in obese females of child-bearing age, the female gender seems to be a definite associated factor for IIH, suggesting an involvement of steroid hormones. Hormonal levels in serum and CSF of patients with IIH have been evaluated in several studies, but results have not been consistent [16, 17]. Currently, the role of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11β-HSD) type 1, which converts inactive cortisone to cortisol, is under investigation. Being expressed in choroid plexus epithelium, it could increase the availability of CSF cortisol and enhance the stimulation of mineralocorticoid receptors, leading to a major activity of NA+ /K+ ATPase and CSF secretion [12]. Interestingly, its activity increases in subcutaneous fat in obese people and decreases in parallel to the reduction of ICP after substantial weight loss in obese IIH patients [18]. The efficacy and safety of the 11β-HSD inhibitor AZD4017 is currently under investigation in IIH Drug Trial (NCT02017444), the first phase 2 placebo-controlled trial in IIH [15, 19].
The association between Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and IIH has been proved, but explained with a high prevalence of obesity in both populations, especially in men [4]. Indeed, both the severity and prevalence of OSA in IIH patients do not seem to be greater than expected considering age, sex, race, BMI and menopausal status [20]. It has been supposed that transient increases of ICP during apneic episodes, due to hypercapnia and vasodilation response, may become sustained because of the compression of cerebral venous sinuses [21]. Even though most of findings do not suggest that OSA has a causative role for IIH, it would be useful to understand if treatment with CPAP can reduce IIH in these patients, since results obtained from clinical studies have not been consistent yet. However, an improvement of OCT measurements and the normalization of CSF opening pressure (CSFop) were reported in a 10-year-old boy with IIH and pre-existing OSA, treated with septoplasty surgery with resolution of sleep apnea episodes and daytime somnolence [22].
Vitamin A and retinoids have also been under evaluation as possible associated factors, since it is known that an excessive intake or chronic lower doses of vitamin A can induce a secondary intracranial hypertension. Retinol, bound in the circulation in a complex with retinol-binding protein and transthyretin, is produced in high levels in the choroid plexus. Uptaken into the cells and converted to all-trans-retinoic-acid, it could modulate gene expression in the arachnoid granulation cells, in ependymal or glial cells, reducing CSF reabsorption. It has been suggested that such a mechanism involves molecules as Aquaporin-1, expressed in choroid plexus epithelium and involved in CSF production, and Aquaporin-4 (AQP-4), expressed in ependyma and astrocytes and maybe cooperating in CSF reabsorption [23]. Although some previous studies disagree in highlighting differences in serum and CSF vitamin A profile between IIH patients and controls [24,25,26], a more recent investigation has highlighted unexpected lower levels of serum all-trans-retinoic-acid in untreated IIH patients compared with controls of similar age, gender and BMI at baseline. Interestingly, treatment with Acetazolamide (ACZ) can cause in itself an increase in CSF all-trans-retinoic-acid in IIH patients compared with placebo [27].
No association has been confirmed between IIH and pregnancy, thyroid diseases, iron deficiency anemia and antibiotic intake [28]. As for hormonal contraceptives, the hypothesis of an association with IIH has long been a matter of debate [29,30,31,32]. Currently, there is not a contraindication for the use of such medications, as reported in the latest guidelines on management [33].
Finally, CSF reabsorption has been hypothesized to be impeded by an altered venous outflow due to venous sinus obstruction [34]. Arachnoid granulations, protruding into cerebral venous sinus, allow CSF resorption, which is more significant into the superior sagittal sinus and hampered in case of increased venous sinus pressure [35]. Such a condition may occur when bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (BTSS) exists, as reported with a prevalence of 65–100% in patients with IIH [36,37,38]. The narrowing is usually located in the mid-lateral part of the transverse sinus, determining a pressure gradient between the proximal and the distal section of the stenosis and higher pressure values in the sagittal sinus, correlated with an increase of ICP [39]. Despite the treatment of the stenosis through a stent placement has proved to be effective in reducing ICP [40, 41], the genesis of BTSS is not equally clear. Venous internal large trabeculae or other filling defects as giant arachnoid granulations could determine a narrowing from inside, while the increased ICP could press on venous walls from outside [42].
A physiopathological model has been proposed by De Simone and coworkers [43], considering the increase of ICP as a result of an excessive collapsibility of dural sinuses. Indeed, such a condition leads to an increase of sinus pressure along with the external physiological ICP fluctuations, impeding CSF outflow with consequent further increase of ICP. In this perspective, the overmentioned factors (trabeculae, giant granulations) and conditions that increase central venous pressure (OSAS, rapid gain of weight) may trigger the loop. This could explain the efficacy of therapeutic strategies which directly expand the sinus, such as stenting [44], or which promptly reduce CSF pressure (pCSF) pushing on sinus wall, such as lumbar punctures (LP) [45] or CSF shunting [46]. Such an intervention allows the reduction of dural sinus pressure and reestablishes a favorable gradient to CSF outflow. Therefore, BTSS would not be simply a consequence of an increased ICP but also a causative factor, and transverse sinus stenting would represent an etiological therapy.
Last but not least, the involvement of BTSS in determining IIH is debated, since it is considered by some authors as a cause of “vascular” intracranial hypertension, a secondary condition that cannot be denominated as “idiopathic” [47]. For the same reason, intracranial hypertension due to cerebral venous thrombosis should be ruled out before taking into consideration IIH, despite clinical findings, CSFop values and comorbidities do not seem to be substantially different [48].
Still little explored is the role of the “glymphatic system”, which seems to be responsible for the removal of metabolites from the brain parenchyma. It seems to operate allowing both CSF recirculation along paravascular spaces, communicating with the interstitial fluid, and CSF drainage into lymphatics across the meningeal sheets of spinal and cranial nerves [49]. According to Lenck et al., this may be the main mechanism determining CSF outflow in normal conditions, resizing the contribution of arachnoid granulations [50]. A glial barrier, consisting of contiguous astrocytic end-feet, separates the interstitial compartment from paravascular spaces, allowing fluid exchanges through the high-density expression of AQP-4 water channel proteins [51]. According to this model, IIH could be explained by a glymphatic dysfunction due to an overload of interstitial fluid, which fails to move forward into the paravenous spaces. This may be the result either of a loss of AQP-4 or of the increased permeability of the blood–brain barrier during perivascular inflammation, which is chronic in obese patients, leading to an expansion of interstitial compartment [49].
Considering common physiopathological mechanisms, several studies have been carried out to explore potential comorbidities. Based on the hypothesis of an androgen excess in the pathogenesis of IIH [52], a recent study has been recently carried out in the United Kingdom to explore the risk of cardiovascular diseases among IIH patients. Compared with healthy controls of similar BMI, age and sex, IIH patients showed twice the risk of cardiovascular disease [53]. Speculating a shared neuroendocrinological genesis, a recent study investigated the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities among a cohort of IIH patients, which were pre-existing in 45% of them and mainly represented by major depressive disorder. Results of this study also detected worse treatment outcomes among IIH patients with psychiatric disorders and a greater prevalence of empty sella among them than in the other group of IIH patients [54].
The association between IIH and primary headaches, especially migraine, is still debated. Whether migraine is a comorbidity, an independent risk factor for the developing of IIH, or a secondary headache due to IIH in patients who are not otherwise predisposed to migraine itself is not entirely clear. It is known that up to 70% of patients with IIH and headache as presenting symptom exhibit migraine features and up to 45% have a personal history of migraine [55]. Furthermore, a prevalence of IIH without papilloedema (IIHWOP) by 10–14% was found among chronic migraine sufferers [56] and it is well known that migraine and IIH share common risk factors, as obesity, female gender and sleep disorders [57, 58]. IIH is thought to be able to reduce the migraine threshold in both patients with pre-existing and new-onset migraine [59]. Moreover, it has been speculated that IIH can promote pain chronicization in patients suffering from pre-existing episodic migraine. Through a continuous stimulation of afferent nociceptors to the congested and distended venous sinuses, a central sensitization may occur resulting in increased frequency and duration of migraine episodes [56]. This could lead to consider IIH as the cause of the high frequency and poor treatment responsiveness of migraine rather than of migraine in itself [60] and to explain why headache can persist even after the reduction of CSFop [59]. Subsequently, it can be particularly challenging to make a diagnosis of primary headache or secondary one in patients with IIH who exhibit such a symptom. According to the latest version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) [61], a headache resembling a primary one should be considered as secondary to IIH whether it is new onset and a close temporal relationship with the intracranial disorder exists. If instead the headache was pre-existing to IIH but worsened under the increase of CSFop, both a diagnosis of primary headache and of headache attributed to IIH should be made [62].
Clinical features
People affected by IIH are usually referred to the neurologist, because they complain of headache, the most common presenting symptom in up to 84% of patients [63]. According to the ICHD-2 criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS), headache attributed to IIH should be characterized by a progressive course and either daily occurrence, constant non-pulsating pain or exacerbation by coughing or with the Valsalva manoeuvre [64]. It is also often referred to as commonly bilateral, frontal or retroocular, showing similarities with tension-type headaches [65], but up to 70% of headache sufferers exhibit migraine features, including unilateral throbbing pain with nausea and photophobia [66]. Patients with pre-existing migraine may exhibit different headache features when developing symptoms due to IIH [59, 62]. Moreover, according to ICHD-3 criteria, not only a new-onset headache, but also a significant worsening of a pre-existing one can be attributed to IIH, whether developing along with the increase of CSFop values [61]. Despite the improvement and even the complete resolution of the symptom would be expected after the normalization of CSFop values [64], the persistence of headache has been reported, sometimes showing little correlation between its severity and frequency and CSFop values [59]. Results from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT) pointed out that headache, particularly with photophobia, was the main factor having a negative impact on general and visual quality of life [55]. Several questionnaires have been used to assess patient reported outcomes in patients with headache disorders. Among them, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire and the Headache Impact Test 6-item have been indicated as reliable tools to assess the frequency and severity of headache and its impact on quality of life [67].
Disturbance of vision is the second most frequent symptom. Visual loss is reported by 32% of patients, occurring with variable visual field defects, mainly an enlargement of the blind spot with a partial inferior arcuate defect [63]. In a recent study, assessing visual field defects in a cohort of 39 patients with IIH and just mild central visual loss, 18% of patients had peripheral visual field defects alone, with normal findings in central visual field. Peripheral temporal defects were the most frequent ones, globally detected in 46% of patients, half of which with inferior temporal deficits, followed by infero-nasal, supero-nasal and arcuate defects [68].
Visual acuity is assumed to be normal in up to 2/3 of cases, except in patients with severe visual loss or damage in the papillomacular region [63]. Men are more likely to report visual disturbances at onset of symptoms than headache, unlike women [4]. Up to 68% of patients complain about transient visual obscurations, non-specific transient episodes of unilateral or bilateral visual loss, due to a transient ischaemia of the optic nerve head (ONH) caused by an increased tissue pressure. They usually last less than a minute and are often precipitated by postural changes, with full visual recovery [69]. Less than 20% of patients refer diplopia as presenting symptom and usually in horizontal plane, since generally due to a 6th cranial nerve (c.n.) palsy [63]. Tinnitus, which is more often bilateral, pulsatile and synchronous with heart rate, can be variable in frequency, from daily to monthly. Several patients refer pain with radicular pattern, dizziness and affective or cognitive alterations [63] (Table 2).
According to Friedman revised diagnostic criteria [70], a normal neurologic examination is required for diagnosis, except for c.n. dysfunctions. These ones more often involve the 6th c.n., with esotropia in 3% of cases, and less frequently the 3rd, 4th or 7th c.n. Olfactory impairment has also been described in a cohort of patients with IIH compared to healthy controls [71]. It is important to underline that the patient’s mental status must be normal. IIH may also have an impact on neuropsychological functions, as explored by Zud and coworkers [72]. Taking account of age and education, patients with IIH had global sub-standard scores, with the lowest scores in tests examining attention and visual spatial processing.
Papilloedema is the most specific sign of intracranial hypertension and it can be observed during the evaluation of the fundus oculi. It is an optic disc swollen due to the raised pressure exerted on the optic nerves, causing an impaired axoplasmic flow. The altered venous outflow from the retina determines at first the loss of previously observed venous pulsations, the engorgement of capillaries and veins on the disc surface with color change from yellowish-pink to red, until the elevation of the optic disc, splinter and flame hemorrhages and cotton-wool exudates in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). Four stages can be recognized: early, fully developed, chronic and atrophic papilloedema [73]. In clinical practice, the Frisén scale has been used to get a formal grading of papilloedema, even if it requires a certain expertise and is burdened by a limited reproducibility. Papilloedema is usually bilateral, despite up to 7% of patients show an asymmetric condition defined as a 2-grade difference at the Frisén scale [63]. A few cases of pseudo-Foster Kennedy with one-sided optic atrophy and papilloedema in the contralateral eye have been described, thought to be asymptomatic up to 25% [74]. Papilloedema can develop rapidly with permanent visual loss in up to 10% of cases [65] and it is often difficult to distinguish from pseudopapilloedema. The latter is not due to an increase in ICP, but to several potential conditions, such as the presence of ONH drusen, hypermetropia, tilted disk, congenital abnormalities, oblique insertions of optic nerves [75].
The condition of IIHWOP is characterized by a 0-grade at the Frisén scale. In a cross-sectional analysis by Digre et al. [76], the prevalence of IIHWOP in a sample of 353 patients was 5.7%. Significant differences in age at onset, BMI, history of migraine and prevalent symptoms between the two groups have not been detected. Patients with IIHWOP, though, exhibit a major prevalence of photopsia and anomalous venous pulses, a minor prevalence of diplopia and enlargement of the blind spot and minor values of ICP despite pathological pCSF patterns, compared with IIH with papilloedema (IIHWP).
Finally, some patients with IIH can be asymptomatic, or even have symptoms of intracranial hypotension, oto- or rhino-liquorrhea, which are rare, but suggestive signs of IIH. Such a clinical condition may occur when chronically raised ICP leads to CSF leaks through remodeling of the skull base, mainly involving ethmoid and sphenoid lateral recess, with subsequent meningo-encephaloceles [77, 78]. Such cases are mostly diagnosed when symptoms of IIH occur after surgical repair of the leak, leading to a new increase of ICP, or when CSF leaks itself recurs after surgery [78, 79].
Neuroradiology
Patients suffering from chronic headache and not presenting papilloedema at the evaluation of the fundus oculi are more likely to be misdiagnosed, since the absence of the typical sign could lead not to consider the possibility of IIH. Neuroradiological signs assume a major significance in these cases, since they may suggest, but not define, the diagnosis of IIH if papilloedema or the 6th nerve palsy are absent, according to Friedman criteria [70].
An empty sella, best observed in T1 sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) sequences, can be a suggestive sign of IIH, with a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 95.3% according to Maralani and coworkers [80], while values of 80% sensitivity and 64% specificity have been reported in a recent study by Mallery et al. [81]. This finding, though, has also been reported in a recent study in patients with pulsatile tinnitus and lateral sinus stenosis without signs of increased ICP [82]. Due to the herniation of the subarachnoid space into the sella turcica, with the consequent flattening of the hypophyseal tissue, empty sella can be partial or total when the pituitary fossa is, respectively, filled with CSF less or more than 50% [83] (Fig. 1). A posterior displacement of pituitary stalk has also been observed in some studies [84].
Another neuroradiological sign is the posterior flattening of the eyeball with the eventual protrusion of the ONH into the vitreous humor (Fig. 2), which has 54–57% sensitivity and 97–100% specificity [80, 81]. According to Agid et al., this finding alone is able to increase 50-fold the probability of having IIH [85] and, if combined with “empty sella”, levels of 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity are reached for patients who show any of the two signs [86]. Moreover, it seems that pituitary height and globe conformation may persist after ICP normalization and papilloedema resolution [84].
The posterior flattening of the eyeball can be best noted employing MR with orbits scan, just like the enlargement of the perioptic subarachnoid spaces, which shows a 51% sensitivity and 83% specificity [81]. Preliminary results showed that this last neuroradiologic sign best correlates with the impairment of colour vision and, together with intraocular optic nerve protrusion, with optic disc assessment [87].
Despite not being part of the current diagnostic criteria, the tortuosity of the midportion of the optic nerve, especially kinking in vertical plane, is a specific sign of increased ICP, increasing the odds of having IIH fivefold [85, 88]. Recently, optic nerve angle measured on both sagittal and axial planes has been proposed as a quantitative measure of tortuosity. Particularly, sagittal optic nerve angle proved to increase after ICP lowering obtained with therapeutic LP [89].
The enhancement of the optic nerve shows low levels of sensitivity, but a nearly 96% specificity [84].
Post-contrast FLAIR hyperintensity of the optic nerve and optic disc has been recently investigated, proving to predict the presence of papilloedema in patients with IIH, with a moderate correlation between the intensity of the enhancement and the severity of papilloedema [90].
Moreover, a recent study investigated the presence of potential differences in osseous optic canal size between eyes in patients with IIH and asymmetric papilloedema, but without substantial results [91].
Finally, the evidence of BTSS has gained importance since it has been identified in a relevant percentage of patients suffering from chronic headache [92, 93] (Fig. 3). In two different studies by Bono and colleagues, BTSS was identified in 9% of patients suffering from chronic tension-type headache and in 6.7% of patients suffering from chronic migraine. In both groups, the two-thirds of patients with BTSS showed increased values of CSFop, being diagnosed with IIH. In another study conducted among 217 patients with chronic headache, all patients with CSFop > 200 mmH2O displayed BTSS, which was present also in 13% of those who had values < 200 mmH2O [94].
Maybe such results should induce to reconsider the diagnosis of a primary headache in similar cases, in favor of a diagnosis of “headache attributed to IIH” according to the latest criteria of the IHS [95]. To best detect BTSS, a MR-venography with three-dimensional phase contrast (3DPC) images setting velocity encoding (VENC) at 15 cm/s should be performed, since it has been proved to be more accurate than both 3DPC with VENC at 40 cm/s and two-dimensional time-of-flight technique [38]. In studies employing 3DPC images setting VENC at 15 cm/s, a prevalence of BTSS amounting to 65–100% has been detected among patients with IIH [36, 38, 81]. Several studies reported values of sensitivity and specificity greater than 90% each for BTSS [36, 37, 88]. According to a recent systematic review and metanalysis on MR signs in IIH, BTSS is the only MR signs among all showing not only high specificity, but also high sensitivity [84].
Infrequently, multiple sinus stenosis have been reported in patients with IIH, involving both transverse sinus and superior sagittal sinus [96]. Moreover, the presence and increased size of an occipital emissary vein, connecting the suboccipital veins with the confluence of sinuses, has been pointed out as a possible sign suggestive of IIH [97]. A combination of at least three of the aforementioned four MR features has proved to be nearly 100% specific and 64% sensitive in detecting IIH, also in patients with chronic headache but without papilloedema [81].
In addition to the overmentioned widely accepted signs, the widening of the foramen ovale has been proposed in a case–control study by Butros and colleagues, able to detect IIH with 81% specificity and 50% sensitivity setting a cut-off value of 30 mm [98]. Indeed, remodeling of the skull base may occur, due to chronically high ICP and potential cause of meningo-encephaloceles and CSF leaks as previously mentioned, mainly involving sphenoid and ethmoid bones [78], with enlargement of Meckel’s cave reported in about 9% of patients [88]. Widening of jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal have also been observed among patients with IIH [99].
Finally, alterations in periventricular white matter have been detected with diffuse tensor MR imaging scans in patients with IIH. The hypothesis of a tissue compression determined by high ICP, with consequent microstructure reorganization, has been speculated and requires further investigations [100].
The presence of slit-like ventricles, tight subarachnoid space and the inferior position of cerebellar tonsils in patients with IIH has been investigated in a recent meta-analysis, showing low levels of sensitivity (6–19%) and good specificity (90–97%) [84].
It is important to recall that the presence of one or more signs significantly increases the odds of a diagnosis of IIH, even though their absence does not rule it out. Finally, MR can also be a useful monitoring for patients with IIH after treatment, particularly as the height of pituitary gland in midsagittal image and the optic nerve sheath thickness seem to be reversible morphometric MR characteristics [101].
CSF pressure monitoring
The pCSF measurement and monitoring remains one of the most important findings to establish a diagnosis of IIH. According to Friedman’s revised diagnostic criteria, a CSFop > 250 mmH2O for adults, and > 280 mmH2O in children, is required. Indeed, if this criterium is not respected when all others are, the diagnosis of IIH can be “probable” but not “definite” [70]. However, the detection of values ranging between 250 and 300 mmH2O is considered as a “grey area”, which has to be carefully interpreted and contextualized, since CSFop values greater than 250 mmH2O have been found in healthy people [102]. LP with CSF analysis and measurement of opening pressure should be performed in all patients with papilloedema after brain imaging and perhaps more extensively in patients with chronic headache suspected to be affected by IIH [33], despite this last indication is still debated [103].
However, the simple measurement of the height of the CSF column may be misleading, as pCSF may vary considerably with time, so the possibility to repeat LP or to perform a more invasive ICP monitoring should be taken into account if a high clinical suspicion persists [33]. Moreover, much more information than the opening pressure value can be inferred from a more prolonged pCSF monitoring, such as peak ICP, mean ICP and ICP amplitude or pulse wave amplitude (PWA), measured as the difference between the maximal and the minimal values of the pCSF during the systolic and the diastolic phase of the arterial pressure at each interval of time. Increased mean values of PWA (≥ 54.8 mmH2O) have been reported in patients with IIH, even in those who showed normal mean ICP values [104]. Similarly, elevated PWA values have also been observed in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus responsive to shunt implantation [105], in some cases of vascular parkinsonism associated to radiological evidence of ventricular enlargement [106], in subarachnoid haemorrhage [107]. In addition, the way PWA varies along with ICP provides indirect information about the compensatory CSF regulatory reserve. On a “pressure–volume curve’’, when PWA varies directly with ICP, little changes in volume produce great changes in ICP denoting a poor compensatory reserve, as observed in IIH [108]. Actually, ICP is not only influenced by the CSF component, but also by volumetric brain tissue variations and by a vasogenic constituent, both arterious and venous [109]. This last one is thought to be the most substantial in triggering an elevation in ICP in patients with IIH. All of these components contribute in determining ICP waveform, which is normally characterized by rapid and regular fluctuations, synchronous with heart and respiratory rate. However, when a depletion of the compensatory reserve occurs, abnormal pulsations can be identified, according to criteria adapted from Lundberg’s original description [110]. Slow rhythmic waves characterized by an increase of ICP from 68.5 to 680 mmH2O and a frequency of 0.5–2 cycles per minute are called B waves, reported in IIH and secondary intracranial hypertension. Differently, A or plateau waves are transitory but sustained increases of ICP lasting for 5–20 min and higher than 680 mmH2O (or less, in case of near-plateau waves) [111]. Interestingly, abnormal pressure pulsations have been recorded during 1-h pCSF monitoring in chronic headache sufferers suspected to have IIHWOP: only those patients who effectively showed increased pCSF values reported abnormal pressure pulsations, while controls and headache sufferers with normal ICP values did not. Moreover, the entity of altered pressure parameters correlated with the likelihood of suffering from associated symptoms, as postural/nocturnal/cough-exacerbated headache, transient visual obscurations, pulsatile tinnitus, vertigo, pulsating pain [112]. In another study, continuous pCSF monitoring allowed to detect IIHWOP in patients with chronic headache, who showed normal resting pCSF values, but wide fluctuations of ICP with increased values during sleep, pathological patterns as B waves and plateau waves and a good clinical response after CSF drainage [111]. Recently, Funnell and coworkers tried to set a cut-off value able to distinguish between IIHWP and IIHWOP through a 24-h ICP monitoring, finding 10 mmHg as the minimum threshold value recorded for at least 30 min in patients with IIHWP, with 91% specificity and 48% sensitivity [113].
It would, therefore, be worthy to perform a pCSF monitoring over a period of at least an hour, to orient in case of doubts or borderline CSFop values. Moreover, overnight pCSF monitoring has been proved to be useful to define patients who can be eligible for surgical CSF diversion and to assess if an implanted CSF diversion is optimally working [109].
Pioneering tools have been recently launched on the market, consisting in microsensors which can be either placed in the brain parenchyma or connected with a ventricular drain through a reservoir, allowing a continuous long-term telemetric ICP monitoring. This could allow to evaluate the advisability of a shunt placement in rapidly worsening patients with IIH or to assess ICP values and the setting of shunt valves in patients who underwent neurosurgical shunt placement [15]. Recently, a porcine model has been developed to investigate orbital CSF flow and pressure and preliminary results reported a more pronounced CSF deceleration in perioptic subarachnoid space than in other sites, especially when eye movements are absent [114].
Other assessments
Optical coherence tomography (OCT), providing cross-sectional images of the retina and allowing measurements of RNFL thickness and total retinal thickness, can be useful in patients with IIH (Figs. 4, 5) for both detecting papilloedema and its eventual reduction after treatment and monitoring chronic axonal damage. An increased peripapillary total retinal thickness is associated with increased ICP [115] and has proved to be more accurate than RNFL thickness especially in higher grades papilloedema, with a good correlation with clinical staging [116]. In such cases, oedema may impede to clearly define macular RNFL by thickening peripapillary retinal layers and to detect the structural damage to the macula [117]. In a recent study, the reduced thickness of ganglion cell complex layer has been proposed as an earlier measure of optic nerve injury [118]. Conversely, the deformation in peripapillary retinal pigment epithelium and Bruch’s membrane as well seems to be useful as marker of disease activity in patients with atrophic papilloedema with scarce RNFL swelling [15]. OCT can also quantify ONH volume, increased in patients with IIH and decreased after treatment with ACZ, together with total retinal thickness and RNFL thickness [119]. With the advent of OCT angiography, ONH vascularization can also be investigated, revealing early findings of papilloedema in IIH as the presence of dilated and tortuous capillaries similar to “a tangled ball of vessels” without vascular dropout [120]. A decrease in peripapillary vessel density has also been detected in patients with IIH compared to healthy controls [121]. Finally, OCT allows to monitor the chronic structural damage of the macular RNFL that occurs over time, resulting from the disc edema [117].
Since visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are used as indicators of the functional integrity of the visual pathway, they have been employed to evaluate the optic nerve damage in chronic IIH [122,123,124].
B-mode ocular ultrasonography can be useful to exclude a condition of pseudopapilloedema, maybe due to the presence of drusen of the ONH, and to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). In a recent study, ONSD has proved to be enlarged more than 5.8 mm in patients with IIH (81% sensitivity, 80% specificity) and to decrease after therapeutic LP [125]. However, a precise cut-off value for ONSD has not be clearly defined [126,127,128] and binocular measurements should be obtained, considering a possible asymmetry [129]. Color-doppler imaging may be also useful to detect an increase of peak systolic velocity of the central retinal artery, due to its location inside the optic nerve, in patients with IIH [125].
When diagnostic doubt persists in discriminating between papilloedema and pseudopapilloedema, fundus fluorescein angiography can be useful, showing a progressive increasing intensity and an area of fluorescence with fluorescein leakage from the oedematous disc in true disc swelling [75]. Fundus autofluorescence imaging, basing on the natural fluorescence properties of lipofuscin, may also reveal the presence of drusen of the ONH, as in some cases of pseudopapilloedema [130].
Diagnostic criteria
IIH diagnostic criteria have been firstly developed in 1937, based on Dandy’s report of 22 patients who presented increased ICP, not due to mass lesions, and suggestive symptoms such as headache, fundus abnormalities, blurred vision and dizziness [131]. They originally included signs and symptoms of increased ICP (higher than 250 mmH2O), no localizing signs except for 6th c.n. palsy, normal CSF composition and the absence of intracranial mass with normal or slit cerebral ventricles. Alongside the development of neuroimaging, a computed tomography or MR brain scan has been explicitly introduced in IIH diagnostic criteria (“modified Dandy criteria”), to exclude venous sinus thrombosis and other structural lesions. Similarly, the need to exclude possible secondary causes of increased intracranial hypertension has been emphasized [132, 133].
In 2013, Friedman and coworkers revised IIH diagnostic criteria, bringing back the term “Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome” and introducing the concept of “probable” diagnosis when all criteria (papilloedema or 6th c.n. palsy, a normal neurological examination except for c.n. abnormalities, a normal CSF composition, normal neuroimaging) are present with the exception of an increased CSFop higher than 250 mmH2O [70] (Table 3). Additionally, criteria for IIHWOP have been specifically described for the first time, pointing out that 6th c.n. palsy can be considered as an equivalent to papilloedema. When both are lacking, neuroradiological findings (empty sella, posterior flattening of the eyeball, distension of the perioptic subarachnoid spaces with or without optic nerve tortuosity, transverse sinus stenosis) become significant not only to exclude other underlying conditions, but to suggest the diagnosis. Indeed, a 64% sensitivity and a 100% specificity have been established for a combination of any three of four MR criteria for the diagnosis of IIH and the same MR criteria were suggestive of IIHWOP in 30% of patients with chronic headache and elevated opening pressure [81]. Since these last criteria have not been universally accepted, another update of the aforementioned “modified Dandy criteria” has been proposed by Wall and coworkers and applied in the IIHTT [63]. According to this revision, a definite diagnosis can be made even when CSFop ranges between 200 and 250 mmH2O, if one of the following additional criteria is satisfied: pulse synchronous tinnitus, 6th c.n. palsy, Frisén grade II papilloedema, exclusion of pseudopapilloedema by echography, evidence of transverse sinus stenosis by MR-venography, partial empty sella and distension of the perioptic subarachnoid spaces [134].
Since headache is the most common presenting symptom, diagnostic criteria for headache attributed to IIH were introduced in the ICHD by the Headache Classification Committee of the IHS in 1988 [135]. In the latest version (ICHD-3 beta) [61], the close temporal relation between a new-onset headache or a significant worsening of a pre-existing one and IIH is an important requirement to define a secondary headache attributed to IIH, regardless of whether its characteristics meet the criteria for primary headaches. It also implies that the development or changes in headache features occur along with CSFop variations and that a reduction of CSFop values results in the improvement of the symptom. As in Friedman’s revised diagnostic criteria [70], the diagnosis of IIH in adults requires both a CSFop exceeding 250 mmH2O and the absence of altered CSF composition, with the presence of papilloedema as a support element to establish a causal relation between headache and IIH. Headache characteristics are not detailed in the last version of ICHD criteria, which shows greater applicability and sensitivity (86%) compared with the previous version (60%), but decreased specificity (50% vs 86%) [136]. ICHD-3 beta version criteria of the IHS are shown in Table 3.
Management
Low-calorie diet
Since obesity has been recognized as a certain associated factor with IIH, a low-calorie diet has been recommended in all patients affected. In a prospective study, 25 overweight women with IIHWP have been put under a low-calorie diet for 3 months, with a consequent mean weight loss of 15.7 kg. They exhibited a mean decrease of ICP of 8 cmH2O, with a significant reduction in headache impact test scores, optic disc elevation, nerve sheath diameter and peripapillary RNFL thickness. An improvement in transient visual obscurations, tinnitus and diplopia were reported in some cases. Moreover, these reductions persisted for 3 months after the patients stopped the diet [137]. Bariatric surgery, inducing a major weight loss, seems to be more effective than low-calorie diet in reducing papilloedema and headache symptoms in obese patients [138] and has been judged as more cost-effective and safer than surgical CSF diversion [139]. It is notable that weight loss currently represents the only disease-modifying treatment for IIH [33].
Pharmacological treatment
In non-overweight patients or in those with more severe symptoms which do not resolve spontaneously, a low-calorie diet alone is not sufficient and a pharmacological management is required, considering the relief of symptoms and the preservation of visual function as the main goal. ACZ, a potent enzyme inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase, is still the main drug employed in IIH, since it is able to reduce CSF secretion at choroid plexus. Its efficacy has recently been evaluated in the IIHTT, a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial [140]. ACZ has been administered at an initial dosage of 500 mg twice a day and increased to a maximum of 4 g daily, combined with a low-sodium low-calorie diet. In patients with IIH and mild visual loss, this treatment has proved to be more effective than diet alone in improving visual field function and quality of life measures and in decreasing papilloedema grade, though the extent of improvement was modest [140]. In another randomized placebo-controlled trial, no strong evidence was obtained about the efficacy of ACZ, maybe due to the small simple size, and a high discontinuation rate due to side effects was recorded [141]. Accordingly, despite modest positive effects were detected in patients treated with ACZ in the aforementioned studies, the Cochrane systematic review published in 2015 concluded that “there is insufficient evidence to recommend or reject the efficacy of this intervention” [142]. An optimal dose has not been established, though the most commonly starting dose is 250–500 mg twice a day [33], generally slowly increased up to 1–2 g daily. The maximum dose of 4 g daily administered in IIHTT was scarcely tolerated due to side effects [143]. In ACZ-resistant headache, topiramate has been used as associated drug or as monotherapy. It is an inhibitor of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, increases GABA-induced chloride flux and inhibits glutamate-related neurotransmission, but it also exerts an action as mild carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Used at a daily dose range of 100–150 mg, its efficacy has proved to be equal to ACZ at a daily dosage of 1000–1500 mg, with the added value of a major weight loss. Moreover, being a first-line agent for migraine prevention, topiramate may have a major benefit for those patients with IIH who suffer from migraine-like headaches [66, 144]. Both the drugs show similar undesirable effects, such as distal paraesthesia, hyporexia, tinnitus, dysgeusia, nephrolithiasis, vomit, nausea and diarrhoea. Few cases of severe metabolic acidosis with respiratory complications have also been described under treatment with ACZ [145].
Other drugs have been proposed for IIH treatment in case of contraindication or intolerance to ACZ or in combined therapies, such as furosemide, which has proved to reduce CSF secretion in animal models [146]. Octreotide, a somatostatin analogue blocking the human growth hormone receptor which is highly expressed in arachnoid villi and choroid plexus, has been proved to be effective in reducing pCSF and symptoms in a small-sample study [147].
Symptomatic therapies for headache management, especially migraine therapies, can be successfully used and recommended in patients with IIH suffering from headache with migraine features, for both the management of acute and chronic conditions. However, drugs determining weight gain and depression should be preferably avoided when choosing therapies for migraine prophylaxis [55].
Lumbar puncture and surgical treatment
Pharmacological treatment may fail or be poorly tolerated or even be inadequate to treat rapid-development symptoms. Non-medical interventions include LP and surgical procedures. LP may have a therapeutic role in addition to its diagnostic one in rapid-development cases of IIH to preserve visual function (Figs. 4, 5). In these cases, indeed, LP may serve as bridge-therapy standing by for surgical diversion. Cases of complete remission after a single LP have also been described [45], since a lowering of just 20–30 ml CSF seems to be sufficient to reopen the collapsed transverse sinus, reducing cerebral venous pressure which may alter CSF circulation. Surgical procedures include CSF shunts [46], transverse sinus stenting [44, 148] and the optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) [149]. Unfortunately, they are not as effective in headache management as they are in the improvement of visual symptoms, so they should not be performed in patients with IIH and headache alone [33]. ONSF is preferred when patients mainly exhibit visual symptoms, especially if unilateral, with no or mild headache. The incision of the meninges encompassing the optic nerve, decreasing the pressure exerted on the nerve by the subarachnoid space, is effective in reducing papilloedema grade and improving visual field function in both eyes, even if unilaterally performed [149]. Though, it seems that a second surgery may be required in about 15% of cases and that over a third of patients have to undergo a subsequent CSF diversion [150]. Surgical CSF diversion may employ ventriculo-atrial (VA), ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) and lumbo-peritoneal (LPE) shunts. Both VP and LPE seem to be equally effective in decreasing symptoms, even if VP shunts have a major failure rate compared to LPE ones, but a minor need to undergo successive revisions [46]. Complications include shunt obstruction or infection, CSF leaks, rarely cerebellar tonsillar herniation, subdural and subarachnoid haemorrhages [66].
ONSF and CSF shunts seemed to be equally efficacious on visual outcomes in comparative case-series of 33 treated patients [151]. Preferentially, the current orientation consists in performing ONSF in case of severe papilloedema and considering CSF shunt when headache symptoms are prevalent, even if headache continues in until 68% of patients in post-operative 6-month follow-up and 79% at 2 years. Furthermore, a post-operative low-pressure headache can occur in 28% of cases [152]. Accordingly, surgical CSF diversion is not recommended to manage isolated headache symptoms [33, 102, 153].
A clinical trial is currently ongoing, with the purpose of comparing the efficacy of VP shunt, ONSF and medical therapy in patients with IIH and moderate-to-severe visual impairment [154].
Since BTSS has been proved to be a suggestive neuroradiological sign for IIH, the endovascular management through a stent placement may be considered as an option in patients who have failed standard therapy. Transverse sinus stenting can reduce ICP by increasing CSF drainage at the arachnoid granulations [44, 148]. In a study by Teleb and coworkers, symptom improvement after stenting has been reported in 94% of patients, reducing headache and papilloedema. The procedure has been performed at a not univocally defined gradient threshold, ranging from 4 to 10 mm Hg, in patients put under dual antiplatelet therapy [155]. Evidence of transverse sinus stenting efficacy on ICP decrease and visual symptoms has been provided by several more recent studies [40, 41, 156]. Despite the presence of a BTSS, unilateral stenting seems to be sufficient to determine a decrease of pressure gradient and resolution of symptoms, even if clear recommendations are not available [157, 158]. Currently, isolated headache does not represent an indication to perform sinus stenting, due to the paucity of evidence [33, 102, 153]. Venous sinus perforation, stent migration, in-stent thrombosis, subdural haemorrhages and the development of recurrent stenoses proximal to the stent could represent rare but severe complications, while a short-lived ipsilateral headache can occur more often. The opportunity to guide the procedure of stent placement with intravascular ultrasound is currently being tested [159]. Main conservative, pharmacological and surgical treatments are summarized in Table 4.
The aforementioned surgical procedures have been evaluated in a systematic review including 41 studies and a total of 728 patients [160]. According to Kalyvas and coworkers, sinus stenting should probably represent the first-line modality of surgical treatment whenever BTSS with a high-pressure gradient is documented, regardless of the clinical presentation.
If such a condition does not occur or if stenting has failed, ONSF should be considered in patients with visual symptoms and no headache, due to its high efficacy and minor cost, while CSF shunt could be taken into account later if severe headache develops or in patients exhibiting headache as the only or prevalent symptom [160].
Prognosis and follow-up
IIH can be a challenging condition, occurring with changeable course and prognosis and requiring a prompt diagnosis and treatment. In case of rapid progression of symptoms, preserving visual function is the main aim and a non-pharmacological approach is often necessary. It is not accident that the term “benign” is no more employed to define this clinical condition, since permanent visual loss can occur in up to 10% of cases, mostly in men [65].
Furthermore, patients diagnosed and treated may relapse years later, often after a weight gain [8]. Relapses may also occur during pregnancy, especially during the first two trimesters, with similar clinical outcomes compared with that one of non-pregnant women, but possibly requiring different therapeutic strategies [161,162,163].
In a retrospective observational study evaluating long-term outcomes in IIH patients with different ages at diagnosis, recurrences mainly occurred within 3 years from treatment discontinuation in adolescents and adult patients and within 1 year in prepuberal children, regardless of CSFop and obesity. Moreover, optic neuropathy and consequent visual decline was prevalent in adult-onset IIH [164]. The earliness of diagnosis, established within 6 months from symptom onset, seems to be a positive prognostic factor for visual improvement [165]. Moreover, the severity of visual defects at onset has proved to correlate well with the final visual outcome [166] and to influence the recurrence rate, which has reported to be greater in women with previous multiple pregnancies in one study [167].
Therefore, monitoring is mandatory in patients with IIH, particularly referring to IIHWP, and should include the assessment of visual acuity, pupil examination, visual field, fundus oculi and BMI [33]. At least an annual optometric assessment should be performed, with OCT as an adjunctive useful tool to monitor the damage of the macular RNFL over time and to detect recurrences [117].
A risk stratification has been recently proposed to provide appropriate monitoring, mainly based on visual status [168]. Fundoscopy and visual field assessment should be assessed at increasingly short intervals ranging from 3 to 6 months for patients at low risk, who do not exhibit either papilloedema or visual impairment or abducens palsy, to 1–4 weeks for high-risk patients with rapidly evolving visual impairment or moderate/severe papilloedema at onset, eventually supported by a MR with orbits scan.
For patients with IIHWOP, whose risk of vision loss seems to be minimal over time, visual monitoring is not needed for a long period and surgical procedures are not recommended [33, 102]. Conversely, in this group of patients as well as in all patients with IIH, weight loss should be pursued if appropriate and headache monitoring in terms of frequency and severity could be useful and achieved with the support of a headache diary. The eventual persistence of headache symptoms even after the lowering of ICP has to be considered and treated as appropriate, not least to avoid the development of medication-overuse headache, which affects about 37% of patients with IIH [102].
Finally, a multidisciplinary approach with the involvement of neurologists, neurosurgeons and ophthalmologists is required to the management of IIH, along with further studies to explain the still unknown underlying pathogenesis.
Conclusions
The aim of this review is to focus on what is known about IIH and what is currently gaining importance in the knowledge and management of a condition which is still only partially understood. Particularly, most of the recent studies reflect increasing interest in the identification of IIHWOP. Indeed, these patients usually suffer from chronic headache and are long-term treated with a symptomatic of prophylactic therapy for a “primary” disorder, instead of being treated for a “secondary” headache, thus removing the underlying cause. Therefore, physicians, and foremost neurologists, should be able to suspect IIH even when faced with a multiform condition (see Table 2). Once the assumption of IIH has been made, neuroradiological signs can help to suggest the diagnosis. However, CSFop remains an essential criterium to make “definite” a probable diagnosis of IIH. A longer pCSF monitoring, though, may allow to identify patients with increased mean ICP and abnormal pressure pulses even when the instantaneous detection of pCSF values may be misleading due to its variability. The employment of these and other additional examinations, as OCT, VEPs, ocular ultrasonography, autofluorescence and fluorescein angiography, reflects the willing to increase diagnostic accuracy and to correctly identify patients who could be easily misdiagnosed. On the other hand, since the concept of IIH has been extended to involve cases of IIHWOP mainly characterized by chronic headache, the risk of overdiagnosis should also be taken into account [103]. A lot still needs to be understood and it is not excluded that, as for other conditions before, what is currently named as “idiopathic” will not be defined like that any longer when the precise physiopathological mechanisms will be understood.
References
Chen J, Wall M (2014) Epidemiology and risk factors for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Int Ophthalmol Clin 54:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0b013e3182aabf11
Yabe I, Moriwaka F, Notoya A et al (2000) Incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in Hokkaido, the northernmost island of Japan. J Neurol 247:474–475
Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M et al (2014) Global, regional and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults 1980–2013: a systematic analysis. Lancet 384:766–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8
Bruce BB, Kedar S, Van Stavern GP et al (2009) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in men. Neurology 72:304–309. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000333254.84120.f5
Cleves-Bayon C (2018) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children and adolescents: an update. Headache 58:485–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13236
Daniels AB, Liu GT, Volpe NJ et al (2007) Profiles of obesity, weight gain, and quality of life in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (Pseudotumor cerebri). Am J Ophthalmol 143:635–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.040
Szewka AJ, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V (2013) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: relation between obesity and visual outcomes. J Neuroophthalmol 33:4–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e31823f852d
Ko MW, Chang SC, Ridha MA et al (2011) Weight gain and recurrence in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a case-control study. Neurology 76:1564–1567. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182190f51
Sugerman HJ, DeMaria EJ, Felton WL et al (1997) Increased intra-abdominal pressure and cardiac filling pressures in obesity-associated Pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology 49:507–511
Kesler A, Kliper E, Shenkerman G, Stern N (2010) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is associated with lower body adiposity. Ophthalmology 117:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.030
Kesler A, Kliper E, Assayag EB et al (2010) Thrombophilic factors in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a report of 51 patients and a meta-analysis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 21:328–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e328338ce12
Markey KA, Uldall M, Botfield H et al (2016) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, hormones, and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. J Pain Res 9:223–232. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S80824
Botfield HF, Uldall MS, Westgate CSJ et al (2017) A glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist reduces intracranial pressure in a rat model of hydrocephalus. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aan0972
ISRCTN - ISRCTN12678718: IIH Pressure—a new treatment for raised brain pressure in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12678718. Accessed 19 Nov 2019
Mitchell JL, Mollan SP, Vijay V, Sinclair AJ (2019) Novel advances in monitoring and therapeutic approaches in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Neurol 32:422–431. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000690
Toscano V, Sancesario G, Bianchi P et al (1991) Cerebrospinal fluid estrone in Pseudotumor cerebri: a change in cerebral steroid hormone metabolism? J Endocrinol Invest 14:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03350271
Klein A, Stern N, Osher E et al (2013) Hyperandrogenism is associated with earlier age of onset of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in women. Curr Eye Res 38:972–976. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2013.799214
Sinclair AJ, Walker EA, Burdon MA et al (2010) Cerebrospinal fluid corticosteroid levels and cortisol metabolism in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a link between 11beta-HSD1 and intracranial pressure regulation? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:5348–5356. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-0729
Safety and effectiveness of 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor (AZD4017) to treat idiopathic intracranial hypertension.—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02017444. Accessed 19 Nov 2019
Thurtell MJ, Trotti LM, Bixler EO et al (2013) Obstructive sleep apnea in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: comparison with matched population data. J Neurol 260:1748–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6858-6
Wall M, Purvin V (2009) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in men and the relationship to sleep apnea. Neurology 72:300–301. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000336338.97703.fb
Onder H, Aksoy M (2019) Resolution of idiopathic intracranial hypertension symptoms by surgery for obstructive sleep apnea in a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Neurosci 14:110–112. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpn.JPN_30_19
Umenishi F, Schrier RW (2002) Induction of human aquaporin-1 gene by retinoic acid in human erythroleukemia HEL cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293:913–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00316-9
Warner JEA, Larson AJ, Bhosale P et al (2007) Retinol-binding protein and retinol analysis in cerebrospinal fluid and serum of patients with and without idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 27:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e31815b9af0
Tabassi A, Salmasi AH, Jalali M (2005) Serum and CSF vitamin A concentrations in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 64:1893–1896. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000163556.31080.98
Jacobson DM, Berg R, Wall M et al (1999) Serum vitamin A concentration is elevated in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 53:1114–1118
Libien J, Kupersmith MJ, Blaner W et al (2017) Role of vitamin A metabolism in IIH: results from the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. J Neurol Sci 372:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.014
Giuseffi V, Wall M, Siegel PZ, Rojas PB (1991) Symptoms and disease associations in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (Pseudotumor cerebri): a case-control study. Neurology 41:239–244
Wysowski DK, Green L (1995) Serious adverse events in Norplant users reported to the food and drug administration’s MedWatch Spontaneous Reporting System. Obstet Gynecol 85:538–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(94)00457-O
Valenzuela RM, Rai R, Kirk BH et al (2017) An estimation of the risk of Pseudotumor cerebri among users of the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Neuroophthalmology 41:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/01658107.2017.1304425
Radhakrishnan K, Thacker AK, Bohlaga NH et al (1993) Epidemiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a prospective and case-control study. J Neurol Sci 116:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510x(93)90084-c
Kilgore KP, Lee MS, Leavitt JA et al (2019) A population-based, case-control evaluation of the association between hormonal contraceptives and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol 197:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.014
Mollan SP, Davies B, Silver NC et al (2018) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: consensus guidelines on management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 89:1088–1100. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317440
Karahalios DG, Rekate HL, Khayata MH, Apostolides PJ (1996) Elevated intracranial venous pressure as a universal mechanism in Pseudotumor cerebri of varying etiologies. Neurology 46:198–202
Hirsch N (2013) Cerebrospinal fluid and its physiology. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 14:379–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2013.06.001
Higgins JNP, Gillard JH, Owler BK et al (2004) MR venography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: unappreciated and misunderstood. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:621–625
Farb RI, Vanek I, Scott JN et al (2003) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the prevalence and morphology of sinovenous stenosis. Neurology 60:1418–1424. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000066683.34093.e2
Fera F, Bono F, Messina D et al (2005) Comparison of different MR venography techniques for detecting transverse sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol 252:1021–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0710-6
Pickard JD, Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M et al (2008) Coupling of sagittal sinus pressure and cerebrospinal fluid pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension–a preliminary report. Acta Neurochir Suppl 102:283–285
Liu X, Di H, Wang J et al (2019) Endovascular stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension with venous sinus stenosis. Brain Behav 9:e01279. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1279
Dinkin MJ, Patsalides A (2017) Venous sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: results of a prospective trial. J Neuroophthalmol 37:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000426
Ahmed RM, Wilkinson M, Parker GD et al (2011) Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1408–1414. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2575
De Simone R, Ranieri A, Sansone M et al (2019) Dural sinus collapsibility, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and the pathogenesis of chronic migraine. Neurol Sci 40:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03775-w
Ahmed R, Friedman DI, Halmagyi GM (2011) Stenting of the transverse sinuses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 31:374–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e318237eb73
De Simone R, Marano E, Fiorillo C et al (2005) Sudden re-opening of collapsed transverse sinuses and longstanding clinical remission after a single lumbar puncture in a case of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Pathogenetic implications. Neurol Sci 25:342–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-004-0368-3
Abubaker K, Ali Z, Raza K et al (2011) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: lumboperitoneal shunts versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts–case series and literature review. Br J Neurosurg 25:94–99. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2010.544781
Iencean SM, Iencean AS (2016) Vascular etiology of intracranial hypertension. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32:389–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2016.04.006
Türay S, Kabakuş N, Hanci F et al (2019) Cause or consequence: the relationship between cerebral venous thrombosis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurologist 24:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000242
de Bezerra MLS, de Ferreira ACAF, de Oliveira-Souza R (2018) Pseudotumor cerebri and glymphatic dysfunction. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00734
Lenck S, Radovanovic I, Nicholson P et al (2018) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the veno glymphatic connections. Neurology 91:515–522. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006166
Benveniste H, Lee H, Volkow ND (2017) The Glymphatic pathway: waste removal from the CNS via cerebrospinal fluid transport. Neuroscientist 23:454–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858417691030
O’Reilly MW, Westgate CS, Hornby C et al (2019) A unique androgen excess signature in idiopathic intracranial hypertension is linked to cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.125348
Adderley NJ, Subramanian A, Nirantharakumar K et al (2019) Association between idiopathic intracranial hypertension and risk of cardiovascular diseases in women in the United Kingdom. JAMA Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1812
Puustinen T, Tervonen J, Avellan C et al (2019) Psychiatric disorders are a common prognostic marker for worse outcome in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 186:105527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105527
Mollan SP, Hoffmann J, Sinclair AJ (2019) Advances in the understanding of headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Neurol 32:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000651
De Simone R, Ranieri A, Fiorillo C et al (2010) Is idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema a risk factor for migraine progression? Neurol Sci 31:411–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0229-1
May A, Schulte LH (2016) Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 12:455–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.93
Chen J, Wall M (2014) Epidemiology and risk factors for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Int Ophthalmol Clin. https://doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0b013e3182aabf11
Friedman DI, Quiros PA, Subramanian PS et al (2017) Headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: findings from the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. Headache 57:1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13153
De Simone R, Ranieri A, Cardillo G, Bonavita V (2011) High prevalence of bilateral transverse sinus stenosis-associated IIHWOP in unresponsive chronic headache sufferers: pathogenetic implications in primary headache progression. Cephalalgia 31:763–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102411399350
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2013) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33:629–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413485658
Curone M, Tullo V, Bussone G (2019) Headache attributed to IIH: clinical evolution in IHS criteria through the years. Neurol Sci 40:55–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03795-6
Wall M, Kupersmith MJ, Kieburtz KD et al (2014) The idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial: clinical profile at baseline. JAMA Neurol 71:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.133
Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (2004) The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):9–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x
Ball AK, Clarke CE (2006) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Lancet Neurol 5:433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70442-2
Mollan SP, Ali F, Hassan-Smith G et al (2016) Evolving evidence in adult idiopathic intracranial hypertension: pathophysiology and management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87:982–992. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-311302
Haywood KL, Mars TS, Potter R et al (2018) Assessing the impact of headaches and the outcomes of treatment: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Cephalalgia 38:1374–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417731348
Wall M, Subramani A, Chong LX et al (2019) Threshold static automated perimetry of the full visual field in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 60:1898–1905. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-26252
Sadun AA, Currie JN, Lessell S (1984) Transient visual obscurations with elevated optic discs. Ann Neurol 16:489–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410160410
Friedman DI, Liu GT, Digre KB (2013) Revised diagnostic criteria for the Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children. Neurology 81:1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a55f17
Samancı B, Samancı Y, Şen C et al (2019) Assessment of the olfactory function in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension using the Sniffin’ sticks test: a case-control study. Headache 59:848–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13538
Zur D, Naftaliev E, Kesler A (2015) Evidence of multidomain mild cognitive impairment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 35:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000199
Campbell WW, DeJong RN (2005) DeJong’s the neurologic examination. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Visa Reñé N, Paredes Carmona F (2019) Pseudo-Foster Kennedy syndrome due to idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2019.09.006
Mollan SP, Markey KA, Benzimra JD et al (2014) A practical approach to, diagnosis, assessment and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Pract Neurol 14:380–390. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2014-000821
Digre KB, Nakamoto BK, Warner JEA et al (2009) A comparison of idiopathic intracranial hypertension with and without papilledema. Headache 49:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01324.x
Manjubashini D, Kiran M, Akshaya S, Nagarajan K (2019) Intrasphenoidal encephalocele with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: need for clarity in terminology and imaging delineation. World Neurosurg 132:129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.186
Pérez MA, Bialer OY, Bruce BB et al (2013) Primary spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 33:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e318299c292
Tam EK, Gilbert AL (2019) Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 30:467–471. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000603
Maralani PJ, Hassanlou M, Torres C et al (2012) Accuracy of brain imaging in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Clin Radiol 67:656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.12.002
Mallery RM, Rehmani OF, Woo JH et al (2019) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging features for improving the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema. J Neuroophthalmol 39:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000767
Zetchi A, Labeyrie M-A, Nicolini E et al (2019) Empty sella is a sign of symptomatic lateral sinus stenosis and not intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:1695–1700. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6210
Auer MK, Stieg MR, Crispin A et al (2018) Primary empty sella syndrome and the prevalence of hormonal dysregulation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115:99–105. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0099
Kwee RM, Kwee TC (2019) Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI signs for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eur J Radiol 116:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.023
Agid R, Farb RI, Willinsky RA et al (2006) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the validity of cross-sectional neuroimaging signs. Neuroradiology 48:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-006-0095-y
Delen F, Peker E, Onay M et al (2019) The significance and reliability of imaging findings in Pseudotumor cerebri. Neuroophthalmology 43:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01658107.2018.1493514
Wong H, Sanghera K, Neufeld A et al (2019) Clinico-radiological correlation of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02288-9
Rehder D (2019) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: review of clinical syndrome, imaging findings, and treatment. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.02.012
Hu R, Holbrook J, Newman NJ et al (2019) Cerebrospinal fluid pressure reduction results in dynamic changes in optic nerve angle on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroophthalmol 39:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000643
Golden E, Krivochenitser R, Mathews N et al (2019) Contrast-enhanced 3D-FLAIR imaging of the optic nerve and optic nerve head: novel neuroimaging findings of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:334–339. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5937
Farrokhi Y, Sharif Kashani S, Aghsaei Fard M et al (2019) Optic canal size in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and asymmetric papilledema. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 184:105376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105376
Bono F, Messina D, Giliberto C et al (2006) Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis predicts IIH without papilledema in patients with migraine. Neurology 67:419–423. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000227892.67354.85
Bono F, Messina D, Giliberto C et al (2008) Bilateral transverse sinus stenosis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema in chronic tension-type headache. J Neurol 255:807–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0676-2
Bono F, Cristiano D, Mastrandrea C et al (2010) The upper limit of normal CSF opening pressure is related to bilateral transverse sinus stenosis in headache sufferers. Cephalalgia 30:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01896.x
Ihsclassification 7.1.1 Headache attributed to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). In: ICHD-3 the international classification of headache disorders 3rd edition. https://www.ichd-3.org/7-headache-attributed-to-non-vascular-intracranial-disorder/7-1-headache-attributed-to-increased-cerebrospinal-fluid-pressure/7-1-1-headache-attributed-to-idiopathic-intracranial-hypertension-iih/. Accessed 15 Apr 2018
Morisaki Y, Nakagawa I, Omoto K et al (2019) Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension caused by multiple venous sinus stenoses. Surg Neurol Int. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI-94-2019
Hedjoudje A, Piveteau A, Gonzalez-Campo C et al (2019) The occipital emissary vein: a possible marker for Pseudotumor cerebri. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:973–978. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6061
Butros SR, Goncalves LF, Thompson D et al (2012) Imaging features of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, including a new finding: widening of the foramen ovale. Acta Radiol 53:682–688. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.110705
Julayanont P, Karukote A, Ruthirago D et al (2016) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: ongoing clinical challenges and future prospects. J Pain Res 9:87–99. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S60633
Sarica A, Curcio M, Rapisarda L et al (2019) Periventricular white matter changes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 6:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.685
Batur Caglayan HZ, Ucar M, Hasanreisoglu M et al (2019) Magnetic resonance imaging of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: before and after treatment. J Neuroophthalmol 39:324–329. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000792
Hoffmann J, Mollan SP, Paemeleire K et al (2018) European headache federation guideline on idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Headache Pain 19:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0919-2
Sengupta S, Eckstein C, Collins T (2019) The dilemma of diagnosing idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema in patients with chronic migraine. JAMA Neurol 76:1001–1002. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1696
Eide PK, Kerty E (2011) Static and pulsatile intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.10.008
Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2008) Changes in intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes after shunt implantation and adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:1141–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0138-8
Giliberto C, Mostile G, Lo Fermo S et al (2017) Vascular parkinsonism or idiopathic NPH? New insights from CSF pressure analysis. Neurol Sci 38:2209–2212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3093-4
Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2006) Intracranial pressure levels and single wave amplitudes, Glasgow Coma Score and Glasgow Outcome Score after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:1267–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0908-0
Czosnyka M, Pickard JD (2004) Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:813–821
Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M (2017) Long-term monitoring of intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus and other CSF disorders. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159:1979–1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3282-1
Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 36:1–193
Torbey MT, Geocadin RG, Razumovsky AY et al (2004) Utility of CSF pressure monitoring to identify idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema in patients with chronic daily headache. Cephalalgia 24:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00688.x
Bono F, Curcio M, Rapisarda L et al (2018) Cerebrospinal fluid pressure-related features in chronic headache: a prospective study and potential diagnostic implications. Front Neurol 9:1090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01090
Funnell JP, Craven CL, D’Antona L et al (2018) Intracranial pressure in patients with papilloedema. Acta Neurol Scand 138:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12922
Fleischman D, Kaskar O, Shams R et al (2019) A novel porcine model for the study of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: development and preliminary results. Front Neurol 10:1137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01137
Skau M, Yri H, Sander B et al (2013) Diagnostic value of optical coherence tomography for intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:567–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2039-z
Scott CJ, Kardon RH, Lee AG et al (2010) Diagnosis and grading of papilledema in patients with raised intracranial pressure using optical coherence tomography vs clinical expert assessment using a clinical staging scale. Arch Ophthalmol 128:705–711. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.94
Albrecht P, Blasberg C, Ringelstein M et al (2017) Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis and monitoring of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol 264:1370–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8532-x
Athappilly G, García-Basterra I, Machado-Miller F et al (2018) Ganglion cell complex analysis as a potential indicator of early neuronal loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroophthalmology 43:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01658107.2018.1476558
Optical Coherence Tomography Substudy Committee, NORDIC Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Study Group (2015) Papilledema outcomes from the optical coherence tomography substudy of the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. Ophthalmology 122:1939–1945.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.003
Rougier M-B, Le Goff M, Korobelnik J-F (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography at the acute phase of optic disc edema. Eye Vis (Lond) 5:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0109-y
Tüntaş Bilen F, Atilla H (2019) Peripapillary vessel density measured by optical coherence tomography angiography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 39:319–323. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000745
Tai TYT (2018) Visual evoked potentials and glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). https://doi.org/10.22608/APO.2017532
Kesler A, Vakhapova V, Korczyn AD, Drory VE (2009) Visual evoked potentials in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.12.008
Hamamci M, Tombul T (2019) Visual evoked potentials follow-up in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 24:185–191. https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2019.3.20190004
Jeub M, Schlapakow E, Ratz M et al (2019) Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve and the central retinal artery in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Clin Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2019.09.003
Rehman H, Khan MS, Nafees M et al (2016) Optic nerve sheath diameter on sonography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension versus normal. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 26:758–760
Messerer M, Berhouma M, Messerer R, Dubourg J (2013) Interest of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasonography in dectecting non-invasively raised intracranial pressure. Neurochirurgie 59:55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2013.02.001
Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T et al (2011) Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 37:1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2224-2
Naldi A, Provero P, Vercelli A et al (2019) Optic nerve sheath diameter asymmetry in healthy subjects and patients with intracranial hypertension. Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04076-y
Malamos P, Masaoutis P, Georgalas I et al (2015) The role of fundus autofluorescence imaging in the study of the course of posterior uveitis disorders. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/247469
Dandy WE (1937) Intracranial pressure without brain tumor. Ann Surg 106:492–513
Smith JL (1985) Whence Pseudotumor cerebri? J Clin Neuroophthalmol 5:55–56
Friedman DI, Jacobson DM (2002) Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 59:1492–1495
Wall M, Corbett JJ (2014) Revised diagnostic criteria for the Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children response. Neurology 83:198–200. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000452039.32455.3e
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (1988) Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 8(Suppl 7):1–96
Yri HM, Jensen RH (2015) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: clinical nosography and field-testing of the ICHD diagnostic criteria. A case-control study. Cephalalgia 35:553–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414550109
Sinclair AJ, Burdon MA, Nightingale PG et al (2010) Low energy diet and intracranial pressure in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prospective cohort study. BMJ 341:c2701
Manfield JH, Yu KK-H, Efthimiou E et al (2017) Bariatric surgery or non-surgical weight loss for idiopathic intracranial hypertension? A systematic review and comparison of meta-analyses. Obes Surg 27:513–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2467-7
Merola J, Selezneva L, Perkins R et al (2019) Cerebrospinal fluid diversion versus bariatric surgery in the management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Br J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2019.1698012
NORDIC Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Study Group Writing Committee, Wall M, McDermott MP et al (2014) Effect of acetazolamide on visual function in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and mild visual loss: the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. JAMA 311:1641–1651. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3312
Ball AK, Howman A, Wheatley K et al (2011) A randomised controlled trial of treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol 258:874–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5861-4
Piper RJ, Kalyvas AV, Young AM et al (2015) Interventions for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003434.pub3
ten Hove MW, Friedman DI, Patel AD et al (2016) Safety and tolerability of acetazolamide in the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. J Neuroophthalmol 36:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000322
Celebisoy N, Gökçay F, Sirin H, Akyürekli O (2007) Treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: topiramate vs acetazolamide, an open-label study. Acta Neurol Scand 116:322–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00905.x
Costello F, Skolnik K, Sarna J, Varughese R (2019) Respiratory complications associated with acetazolamide use in the management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000000813
McCarthy KD, Reed DJ (1974) The effect of acetazolamide and furosemide on cerebrospinal fluid production and choroid plexus carbonic anhydrase activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 189:194–201
Panagopoulos GN, Deftereos SN, Tagaris GA, et al (2007) Octreotide: a therapeutic option for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurol Neurophysiol Neurosci 1
Albuquerque FC, Dashti SR, Hu YC et al (2011) Intracranial venous sinus stenting for benign intracranial hypertension: clinical indications, technique, and preliminary results. World Neurosurg 75:648–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.11.012(discussion 592–595)
Alsuhaibani AH, Carter KD, Nerad JA, Lee AG (2011) Effect of optic nerve sheath fenestration on papilledema of the operated and the contralateral nonoperated eyes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Ophthalmology 118:412–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.025
Satti SR, Leishangthem L, Chaudry MI (2015) Meta-analysis of CSF diversion procedures and dural venous sinus stenting in the setting of medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:1899–1904. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4377
Fonseca PL, Rigamonti D, Miller NR, Subramanian PS (2014) Visual outcomes of surgical intervention for pseudotumour cerebri: optic nerve sheath fenestration versus cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Br J Ophthalmol 98:1360–1363. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-304953
Sinclair AJ, Kuruvath S, Sen D et al (2011) Is cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension worthwhile? A 10-year review. Cephalalgia 31:1627–1633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102411423305
Friedman DI (2019) Contemporary management of the Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. Expert Rev Neurother 19:881–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2019.1660163
Surgical Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial—full text view - ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03501966. Accessed 1 Dec 2019
Teleb MS, Cziep ME, Issa M et al (2015) Stenting and angioplasty for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a case series with clinical, angiographic, ophthalmological, complication, and pressure reporting. J Neuroimaging 25:72–80
Lenck S, Vallée F, Labeyrie M-A et al (2017) Stenting of the lateral sinus in idiopathic intracranial hypertension according to the type of stenosis. Neurosurgery 80:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001261
Teleb MS, Cziep ME, Lazzaro MA et al (2013) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. A systematic analysis of transverse sinus stenting. Interv Neurol 2:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357503
Nicholson P, Lenck S, Kucharczyk W, Mendes-Pereira V (2019) Dynamic nature of intracranial venous sinuses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Interv Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019919871393
Yan F, Rajah G, Ding Y et al (2019) Safety and efficacy of intravascular ultrasound as an adjunct to stenting for cerebral venous sinus stenosis-induced idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a pilot study. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.11.JNS181885
Kalyvas AV, Hughes M, Koutsarnakis C et al (2017) Efficacy, complications and cost of surgical interventions for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159:33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3010-2
Huna-Baron R, Kupersmith MJ (2002) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in pregnancy. J Neurol 249:1078–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-002-0791-4
Kesler A, Kupferminc M (2013) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension and pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56:389–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e31828f2701
Negro A, Delaruelle Z, Ivanova TA et al (2017) Headache and pregnancy: a systematic review. J Headache Pain. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-017-0816-0
Hilely A, Hecht I, Goldenberg-Cohen N, Leiba H (2019) Long-term follow-up of Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in prepubertal children, adolescents, and adults. Pediatr Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.04.018
Afonso CL, Talans A, Monteiro MLR (2015) Factors affecting visual loss and visual recovery in patients with Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. Arq Bras Oftalmol 78:175–179. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20150045
Tata G, Kisabay A, Gokcay F, Celebisoy N (2019) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: are there predictors for visual outcome or recurrences? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 183:105378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105378
Pollak L, Zohar E, Glovinsky Y, Huna-Baron R (2013) Reevaluation of presentation and course of idiopathic intracranial hypertension–a large cohort comprehensive study. Acta Neurol Scand 127:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12060
Onyia CU, Ogunbameru IO, Dada OA et al (2019) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Proposal of a stratification strategy for monitoring risk of disease progression. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 179:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.02.013
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, ST, MZ; literature search, ST; resources, ST, SLF, ER, CGC, FP, MZ; writing—original draft preparation, ST; critical revision: SLF, ER, CGC, FP, MZ; writing—review and editing, ST, MZ; visualization, SLF, ER, CGC, FP; supervision, SLF, FP, MZ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toscano, S., Lo Fermo, S., Reggio, E. et al. An update on idiopathic intracranial hypertension in adults: a look at pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management. J Neurol 268, 3249–3268 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09943-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09943-9