Abstract
There are several metric and morphological methods available for sex estimation of skeletal remains, but their reliability and applicability depend on the sexual dimorphism of the remains as well as on the availability of preserved bones. Some studies showed that age-related changes on bones can cause misclassification of sex. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability of pelvic morphological traits and metric methods of sex estimation on relatively old individuals from a modern Italian skeletal collection. The data for this study were obtained from 164 individuals of the Milano CAL skeletal collection and average age of the samples was 75 years. In the pelvic morphological method, the recalibrated regression formula of Klales and colleagues (2012), pre-auricular sulcus, and greater sciatic notch morphology were used for sex estimation. With regard to the metric method, 15 standard measurements from upper and lower limbs were analyzed for sexual dimorphism. The results showed that in pelvic morphological approach, the application of regression formula of the revised Klales and colleague formula (2017) resulted in 100% accuracy. Classification rates of metric methods vary from 75.19 to 90.73% with the maximum epiphyseal breadth of proximal tibia representing the most discriminant parameter. This study confirms that the effect of age on sex estimation methods is not substantial, and both metric and morphological methods of sex estimation can be reliably applied to individuals of Italian descent in middle and late adulthood.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In the forensic anthropological analysis of human skeletal remains, the estimation of sex is the first step in the construction of the biological profile of an individual [1]. The determination of sex by DNA analysis is more accurate compared to other available methods, but its application has practical limitations such as cost and unavailability of DNA in enough quantities in poorly preserved skeletons [2]. Therefore, the forensic anthropologist uses various morphological and metric methods to estimate sex in skeletal remains. Several bones in the human skeleton show marked sexual dimorphism and are suitable for the sexing of individuals.
In morphological methods, pelvis and skull are often used to estimate sex. The pelvic bone is known to be the most sexually dimorphic bone of the human skeleton, especially in adult individuals [3, 4]. Therefore, several methods have been developed based on a visual assessment or scoring of morphological traits to assess sex. In 1969, Phenice [4] proposed a new method of sex estimation based on the presence or absence of the ventral arch, sub-pubic concavity, and the medial aspect of the ischio-pubic ramus. Different researchers extensively tested this method which showed a high accuracy rate (> 80%) in sex estimation [5,6,7,8,9]. In 2012, Klales and colleagues [8] revised the Phenice method by giving ordinal scores to all three morphological traits in contrast to the original method proposed by Phenice. Recently, this method has been recalibrated by using skeletons from American, Hispanic, South African, and Thai populations, and a new validated regression formula for sex estimation has been developed [10].
In forensic cases, when only dismembered, fragmented skeletal remains are recovered, the forensic anthropologists are expected to use the available bones to build the biological profile of the individual. In such conditions, well-established methods based on complete innominate are less useful. The preauricular sulcus is one of the frequently studied dimorphic traits of the innominate, and its presence is said to be indicative of female sex [11, 12]. Initially, it was believed that the presence of the preauricular sulcus was the marker of parturition [13], but later, it was found to be present in males as well [14]. The studies on preauricular sulcus morphology [15,16,17] showed that it could be used as a reliable indicator for sex estimation. The greater sciatic notch morphology represents another dimorphic trait of the innominate. In males, it tends to be narrow, and in females, it is relatively wide [18, 19]. The size of the pelvic bone and the development of structures around its margins, such as the ischial spine, influence the shape of the greater sciatic notch [18]. Studies on this trait also revealed that it could be used for sex estimation with reasonable accuracy [18,19,20].
The sexual differences are usually not apparent in long bones, but the metric method with a statistical approach can aid the estimation of sex with high accuracy [21,22,23,24]. Metric methods are considered to perform better than morphological methods, as the former eliminates the subjectivity inherent to morphological assessment and thus reduces the inter-observer and intra-observer errors [25, 26]. Though metric methods have reasonable accuracy rates, it is evident that one population standard should not be used for another population for sex assessment as there may be a significant variability in sexual dimorphism between populations [27].
The biomechanical environment is known to influence the morphological appearance of the bone and its structure [28]. In addition, hormone levels, differences in growth rates, and disease process also have effects on the morphological aspect of bones [29]. Aging influences skeletal morphology in different ways. During the aging process, bone resorption occurs from the cortical surface, while, at the same time, this process is compensated by periosteal apposition and bone enlargement [30]. Moreover, estrogen deficiency state in the post-menopause stage leads to loss of trabecular bone. It is also reported that age-related periosteal bone formation differs between the sexes [31,32,33]. Age-related changes in skeletal material can sometimes lead to erroneous results in sex estimation [34]. Indeed, increased misclassification tendency has been noted on the metric method of sex estimation on the patella [35] and scapula [36] in individuals with advanced age.
It is reported that post-menopausal women show more masculine features in the cranium compared to young age [9]. Effect of age on pelvic morphological traits has not been studied extensively. Lovell [37] conducted a study to test the Phenice method and noted that the accuracy of sex estimation decreases in old age. The greater sciatic notch morphology pattern said to change with age, and Walker [20] reported that older females are likely to be misclassified as males based on its morphology.
In the past, many metric studies on sex estimation of long bones were undertaken on European populations [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Some studies have been conducted on elderly populations, but many of them focused on single bone measurements [39,40,41,42].
The aim of the present study is to assess the reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on sex estimation of individuals in middle and late adulthood from an Italian skeletal collection. Furthermore, this study aims to determine whether morphological traits should be preferred over metric methods in sex estimation in case of fragmented skeletal remains.
Material and methods
This study was carried out on skeletons with known age and sex, from the CAL Milano Cemetery Skeletal Collection [46]. The collection consists of 2127 skeletons housed in the LABANOF (Laboratorio di Antropologia e Odontologia Forense), in the Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan (Italy), and is available for research purposes, in accordance with article 43 of the Italian National Police Mortuary Regulation [47]. The collection is constituted of skeletons which had been buried in the cemeteries of Milan and then exhumed by cemetery workers after 10 years of burial with the aid of machinery. Each skeleton of the collection is associated with documentation that includes dates of birth and death, age, sex, cause of death, and the details of pathological and traumatic conditions of the deceased. This collection contains skeletons of individuals who died between 1910 and 2001; however, 85% of individuals died after 1980.
At the time of the study, only a few hundred skeletons had been cleaned. Among these skeletons, the best preserved ones were chosen for this investigation.
Accordingly, a total of 164 adult skeletons (74 males and 90 females) were selected from the CAL Milano cemetery skeletal collection. All selected individuals were born after 1905 and died between 1986 and 1998, with an average age-at-death of 74.9 years (Table 1). Bones with evidence of antemortem trauma, morphological deformity, pathological or taphonomic changes, which would lead to the alteration of measurements, were excluded from this study. Based on these criteria, some selected skeletons had bones that were not suitable for this study. Therefore, those bones were excluded, but the remaining bones of the same individual were included for the study.
Two forensic pathologists who are trained in physical anthropology carried out the study.
Morphological methods
Concerning morphological methods, the scores of the subpubic concavity (SPC), medial aspect of the ischio-pubic ramus (MA), and ventral arc (VA) were calculated as described by Klales and colleagues [8]. The pubic bone trait accuracy in sex estimation was calculated by using a logistic regression equation derived from the recalibration of the Klales et al. method on global pooled samples [10]: Y = 1.42969(VA) + 1.0415(SPC) + 0.9752(MA) − 10.0139. The value 0 was taken as sectioning point: the negative values obtained from the regression formula were considered as females and the positive values regarded as males. The scores of the greater sciatic notch morphology and preauricular sulcus morphology were assigned as described by Buikstra and Ubelaker [11]. For the greater sciatic notch, the scores 1 and 2 were classified as females, score 3 was accounted as indeterminate, and scores higher than 3 were considered as males. For the preauricular sulcus, its presence or absence was assessed. Absence was considered as male, and its presence was classified as female, irrespective of its morphological score. For all morphological methods, left side innominate bones were used.
In addition, inter- and intra-observer agreement (Cohen’s kappa) was calculated for repeating 30 assessments for each morphological trait by two trained operators and by the primary investigator in 1-week interval.
Metric methods
The post-cranial measurements were taken, as described by Buikstra and Ubelaker [11], by using an osteometric board and a digital sliding caliper (Table 2). The measurements were compared for inter- and intra-observer reliability. The inter-observer reliability was assessed by repeating the same measurements by the second operator on the entire study sample, whereas the intra-observer reliability was tested by repeating 30 skeletal measurements in 1-week interval by the primary investigator. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the degree of agreement between the measurements.
The right and left measurements were checked for asymmetry in both sexes and no statistically significant asymmetry was found. All available left side measurements were included for the metric sex estimation. For each measurement, mean values, standard deviation, t test, and p values were calculated on both sexes to ascertain whether there are statistically significant differences between males and females. The sectioning points for each variable were obtained by taking the averages of male and female mean values [25]. If a measurement lied above the sectioning point, the individual was classified as male, and if the measurement lied below, the individual was considered as female.
The classification rates for each measurement were calculated as described by Barnes and Wescott [48].
Results
Intra- and inter-observer agreement for morphological assessment of pelvic traits is reported in Table 3. The following criteria were used to interpret the agreement: kappa < 0 poor agreement, 0–0.20 slight agreement, 0.21–0.40 fair agreement, 0.41–0.60 moderate agreement, 0.61–0.80 substantial agreement, 0.81–1.00 (almost) perfect agreement [49]. Based on this, the inter-observer agreement varied between slight and moderate, with the subpubic concavity and the greater sciatic notch showing the highest agreement. On the contrary, the intra-observer agreement was almost perfect for all the morphological traits, except for the subpubic concavity which, however, showed a substantial agreement.
With regard to the application of the logistic regression equation derived from the recalibration of the Klales et al. method on global pooled samples [10], both males and females were correctly classified in 100% of the cases (Table 4).
The assessment of the preauricular sulcus and the morphology of the greater sciatic notch (Table 5) indicated that the former is characterized by a higher combined accuracy (89.6% vs 85.4%).
Concerning measurements, ICC value interpretation criteria described by Koo and Li [50] were used to assess the intra- and inter-observer agreement. A value below 0.50: poor agreement, between 0.50 and 0.75: moderate agreement, between 0.75 and 0.90: good agreement and above 0.90: excellent agreement. Most of the measurements showed an “excellent” intra- and inter-observer agreement (Table 6). The only exceptions regarded the maximum length of the tibia, along with the humerus vertical head diameter and epicondylar breadth which indicated a “good” agreement between the observations of the two raters.
Table 7 provides the descriptive statistics, sectioning points, classification rates for all left side measurements. All t tests comparing the male and female value were significant (p < 0.005) and the classification rates varied from 90.73 to 75.19%. The highest classification rate was obtained by using the maximum epiphyseal breadth of proximal tibia, and the lower value regarded the maximum length of the femur.
Discussion
Visual methods of sex estimation from pelvic morphological traits give relatively quick results [34]. The accuracy of sex estimation by using the logistic regression equation derived from the recalibration of the Klales et al. method on pelvic morphological traits was equal to 100% in our study. Similar results have also been reported on a Mexican population [51]. The same formula has shown a high accuracy rate (> 95%) for American white and South African white populations [10]. The result of the present study confirms that morphological traits such as subpubic concavity, medial aspect of the ischio-pubic ramus, and ventral arc are highly dimorphic in advanced age individuals. Furthermore, it also confirms that the recalibrated formula of the Klales et al. method can be successfully used with European individuals in middle and late adulthood.
The presence of the preauricular sulcus as a dimorphic trait has been studied in different populations such as American, Japanese, and German and yielded conflicting results on accuracy [15,16,17]. In the present study, female sex estimation accuracy was higher (100%) in comparison to male sex (79.2%), and the same trend was observed for the Hamann-Todd Human Osteological Collection [17]. The combined accuracy rate obtained in our study (89.6%) was higher than the accuracy rates obtained from studies on the William M. Bass and Terry Collections (78.8%) [16] and Hamann-Todd Human Osteological Collection (75.8%) [17]. This observation confirms that preauricular sulcus is highly sexually dimorphic in the tested Italian population.
The ordinal scoring system of the greater sciatic notch has a good impact on sex estimation of fragmented pelvic bones. It was the most preserved morphological feature of the study sample. The accuracy of female sex estimation (88.5%) was higher than that of males (82.3%) based on greater sciatic notch morphology. Similar results were obtained by Novak and colleagues [16] in their study on William M. Bass and Terry collections. Walker [20], in his study on Americans of European or African ancestries, found a relationship between the age-at-death and the morphology of the greater sciatic notch. Elderly females tend to have narrower, more “masculine” sciatic notches and they are likely to be misclassified as males. Nonetheless, in the present study, the accuracy in sex estimation was higher in females compared to males. The combined accuracy rate of 87.1% in sex estimation in this study showed that the grater sciatic notch morphology demonstrates a high sexual dimorphism in the tested Italian population and age seems to have have minimum influence on it.
In the current study, all pelvic morphological traits tested showed good sexual dimorphism. The primary limitations found for these methods on the tested sample were their applicability, repeatability, and reproducibility. The applicability of the tested methods depends on the state of preservation of bone which varies significantly between the different regions of pelvic bones. The greater sciatic notch morphological features were preserved better than pubic bone in this study sample, and the same pattern has been observed in other studies [52, 53]. Though the application of Klales method yielded 100% accuracy, the preservation of pubic bone traits reduced the applicability of the method to less than half of the study sample.
Morphological scores depend on visual assessment, which is greatly influenced by the level of subjectivity [54, 55]. The main problem found in ordinal scoring of morphological traits is the unreliability of its application on a large sample in a replicable manner [56]. The high degree of observer subjectivity, a lack of consistency in the evaluation of traits, and a strong influence of the previous experience of the observer are some reported factors that can affect sex estimation based on the assessment of morphological characteristics [18]. In the present study, the tests of the intra- and inter-rater reliability demonstrated a slight to substantial agreement between observations which is in line with previous studies which highlighted the limited value of repeatability and reproducibility of sex estimation methods based on the assessment of morphological traits [57, 58].
With regard to sex estimation by metric method, ICC values showed excellent to a good inter-observer agreement. Moreover, the excellent intra-observer agreement between measurements confirmed the repeatability and reproducibility of the metric method on the tested sample.
The results of the metric analysis revealed a high classification rate (> 80%) for most parameters indicating a high sexual dimorphism in the tested Italian population and therefore availability of a number of long bone measurements to successfully perform sex estimation. The maximum epiphyseal breadth of proximal tibia and the femur epicondylar breadth showed the best results in discriminating between males and females. The former showed the highest classification rates also in American white population, whereas the latter in American black population [25].
In agreement with previous studies on long bones metrics [27, 59, 60], the length of the bone resulted less useful in discriminating between males and females compared to the epiphyseal breadth, although also the former guarantees good classification rates. This applies to both the tibia [26, 34, 61] and the femur [17, 48], as well as to the bones of the upper limb [37, 62, 63].
Conclusion
This is the first study on postcranial bones of a middle and late adulthood Italian population comparing the sexing accuracy of pelvic morphological traits and selected long bone measurements. The results of this study demonstrated the validity of the tested sexing methods, also with individuals in the late adulthood with a high degree of confidence.
When pubic bone is available, the logistic regression equation derived from the recalibration of the Klales et al. method on pelvic morphological traits seem to be the most reliable way to estimate sex. However, both in archeological and forensic contexts such morphological traits may not always be assessable due to bone degradation. In such cases, other morphological traits of the pelvis such as the greater sciatic notch and the preauricular sulcus, along with the epiphyseal breadth of long bones, guarantee a good ability in discriminating between males and females of Italian descent.
References
González PN, Bernal V, Perez SI, Barrientos G (2007) Analysis of dimorphic structures of the human pelvis its implications for sex estimation in samples without reference collections. J Archaeol Sci 34:1720–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.12.013
Tomczyk J, Nieczuja-Dwojacka J, Zalewska M, Niemiro W, Olczyk W (2017) Sex estimation of upper long bones by selected measurements in a Radom (Poland) population from the 18th and 19th centuries AD. Anthropol Rev 80(3):287–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/anre-2017-0019
Iscan MY, Steyn M (2013) The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield
Phenice TW (1969) A newly developed visual method for sexing the os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 30:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330300214
Volk C, Ubelaker DH (2002) A test of the Phenice method for the estimation of sex. J Forensic Sci 47:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15200j
Bruzek J, Murail P (2006) Methodology and reliability of sex determination from the skeleton. In: Schmitt A, Cuhna E, Pinheiro J (eds) Forensic anthropology and medicine, complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 225–242
Kelley MA (1978) Phenice’s visual technique for the os pubis: a critique. Am J Phys Anthropol 48:121–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330480118
Klales AR, Ousley SD, Vollner JM (2012) A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. Am J Phys Anthropol 149(1):104–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22102
Brickley M (2004) Determination of sex from archaeological skeletal material and assessment of parturition. Standards for recording human remains. BABAO, Southampton 23-25
Kenyhercz MW, Klales AR, Stull KE, McCormick A, Cole SJ (2017) Worldwide population variation in pelvic sexual dimorphism: a validation and recalibration of the Klales et al. method. Forensic Sci Int 277:259–2e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.05.001
Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 44
Byers SA (2011) Introduction to forensic anthropology. Routledge, New York
Houghton P (1974) The relationship of the preauricular groove of the ilium to pregnancy. Am J Phys Anthropol 41:381–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330410305
Cox M, Scott A (1992) Evaluation of the obstetric signatures of some pelvic characters in an 18th century British sample of known parity status. Am J Phys Anthropol 89:431–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330890404
Hoshi H (1961) On the preauricular groove in the Japanese pelvis with special reference to the sex difference. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 37(3):259–269. https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj1936.37.3_259
Novak L, Schultz JJ, McIntyre M (2012) Determining sex of the posterior ilium from the Robert J. Terry and William M. Bass collections. J Forensic Sci 57(5):1155–1160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02122.x
Karsten JK (2018) A test of the preauricular sulcus as an indicator of sex. Am J Phys Anthropol 165(3):604–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23372
Bruzek J (2002) A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 117(2):157–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10012
Singh S, Potturi BR (1978) Greater sciatic notch in sex determination. J Anat 125:619–624
Walker PL (2005) Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 127(4):385–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10422
İşcan MY, Miller-Shaivitz P (1984) Discriminant function sexing of the tibia. J Forensic Sci 29(4):1087–1093. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs11775j
İşcan MY, Yoshino M, Kato S (1994) Sex determination from the tibia: standards for contemporary Japan. J Forensic Sci 39(3):785–792. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs13656j
Ubelaker DH (1989) Human skeletal remains. Taraxacum, Washington
Dibennardo R, Taylor JV (1982) Classification and misclassification in sexing the black femur by discriminant function analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 58(2):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330580206
Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci 56:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x
Adams BJ, Byrd JE (2002) Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements. J Forensic Sci 47(6):1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15550j
Steyn M, İşcan MY (1997) Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 90(1–2):111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(97)00156-4
Burns KR (2012) Forensic anthropology training manual, 3rd edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Stini WA (1985) Growth rates and sexual dimorphism in evolutionary perspective. In: Gilbert RI, Mielke JH (eds) The analysis of prehistoric diets. Academic, Orlando, pp 191–226
Seeman E (2001) Sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(10):4576–4584. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.86.10.4576
Duan Y, Turner CH, Kim B-T, Seeman E (2001) Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 16(12):2267–2275. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2267
Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1988) Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia. J Orthop Res 6:886–896
Duan Y, Seeman E, Turner CH (2001) The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 16(12):2276–2283. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2276
Krishan K, Chatterjee PM, Kanchan T, Kaur S, Baryah N, Singh RK (2016) A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. Forensic Sci Int 261:165–1e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007
Kemkes-Grottenthaler A (2005) Sex determination by discriminant analysis: an evaluation of the reliability of patella measurements. Forensic Sci Int 147(2–3):129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.075
Dabbs GR, Moore-Jansen PH (2010) A method for estimating sex using metric analysis of the scapula. J Forensic Sci 55(1):149–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01232.x
Lovell NC (1989) Test of Phenice's technique for determining sex from the os pubis. Am J Phys Anthropol 79(1):117–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330790112
Kranioti EF, Apostol MA (2015) Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greeks, Italians, and Spanish: forensic implications. Int J Legal Med 129(2):357–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1045-6
Kranioti EK, García-Donas JG, Prado PA, Kyriakou XP, Langstaff HC (2017) Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greek-Cypriots and Cretans: forensic applications. Forensic Sci Int 271:129–1e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.018
Mall G, Hubig M, Büttner A, Kuznik J, Penning R, Graw M (2001) Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm. Forensic Sci Int 117(1–2):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00445-x
Alunni-Perret V, Staccini P, Quatrehomme G (2008) Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population. Forensic Sci Int 175(2–3):113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.018
du Jardin P, Ponsaillé J, Alunni-Perret V, Quatrehomme G (2009) A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population. Forensic Sci Int 192(1–3):127–1e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.07.014
Krui I, Jerkovi I, Anelinovi D (2017) Sex estimation standards for medieval and contemporary Croats. Croat Med J 58(3):222–230. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.222
Bašić Ž, Anterić I, Vilović K, Petaros A, Bosnar A, Madžar T, Anđelinović Š (2013) Sex determination in skeletal remains from the medieval Eastern Adriatic coast–discriminant function analysis of humeri. Croat Med J 54(3):272–278. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2013.54.272
MacLaughlin SM, Bruce MF (1985) A simple univariate technique for determining sex from fragmentary femora: its application to a Scottish short cist population. Am J Phys Anthropol 67(4):413–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330670413
Cattaneo C, Mazzarelli D, Cappella A, Castoldi E, Mattia M, Poppa P, De Angelis D, Vitello A, Biehler-Gomez L (2018) A modern documented Italian identified skeletal collection of 2127 skeletons: the CAL Milano Cemetery Skeletal Collection. Forensic Sci Int 287:219.e1–219.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.041
DPR 10.09.90 n° 285, art. 43 http://presidenza.governo.it/USRI/ufficio_studi/normativa/D.P.R./2010/20settembre/201990,/20n./20285.pdf. Accessed November 2019
Barnes J, Wescott DJ (2008) Sex determination of Mississippian skeletal remains from human measurements. Missouri Archaeol 68:133–137
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Gómez-Valdés JA, Garmendia AM, García-Barzola L, Sánchez-Mejorada G, Karam C, Baraybar JP, Klales AR (2017) Recalibration of the Klales et al. (2012) method of sexing the human innominate for Mexican populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 162(3):600–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23157
Telmon N, Rougé D, Brugne JF, Sevin A, Larrouy G, Arbus L (1993) Critères ostéoscopiques d'exploration du vieillissement. L'exemple de la nécropole médiévale de Saint-Étienne de Toulouse. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris 5(1):293–300. https://doi.org/10.3406/bmsap.1993.2358
Waldron T (1987) The relative survival of the human skeleton: implications for paleopathology. In: Boddington A, Garland AN, Janaway RC (eds) Death, decay and reconstruction. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 55–64
Steyn M, Pretorius E, Hutten L (2004) Geometric morphometric analysis of the greater sciatic notch in South Africans. Homo 54(3):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1078/0018-442x-00076
Kemkes-Grottenthaler A, Löbig F, Stock F (2002) Mandibular ramus flexure and gonial eversion as morphologic indicators of sex. Homo 53(2):97–111. https://doi.org/10.1078/0018-442x-00039
Konigsberg LW, Hens SM (1998) Use of ordinal categorical variables in skeletal assessment of sex from the cranium. Am J Phys Anthropol 107:97e112. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199809)107:1<97::aid-ajpa8>3.3.co;2-s
Walker L (2008) Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. Am J Phys Anthropol 136(1):39–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20776
Walrath DE, Turner P, Bruzek J (2004) Reliability test of the visual assessment of cranial traits for sex determination. Am J Phys Anthropol 125(2):132–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10373
İşcan MY, Shihai D (1995) Sexual dimorphism in the Chinese femur. Forensic Sci Int 74(1–2):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(95)01691-B
DiBennardo R, Taylor JV (1979) Sex assessment of the femur: a test of a new method. Am J Phys Anthropol 50(4):635–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330500415
Moore MK, DiGangi EA, Ruíz FPN, Davila OJH, Medina CS (2016) Metric sex estimation from the postcranial skeleton for the Colombian population. Forensic Sci Int 262:286–2e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.018
Frutos LR (2005) Metric determination of sex from the humerus in a Guatemalan forensic sample. Forensic Sci Int 147(2–3):153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.077
Berrizbeitia EL (1989) Sex determination with the head of the radius. J Forensic Sci 34(5):1206–1213. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs12754j
Funding
No funding was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selliah, P., Martino, F., Cummaudo, M. et al. Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection. Int J Legal Med 134, 1683–1690 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02292-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02292-2