Introduction

Patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) have a high risk of death and rehospitalization [1]. Among metabolic disorders, serum potassium level has been a factor of interest in this setting. Serum potassium (sK+) is under the control of several factors that can be altered in patients with AHF including renal function or activation of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system [2, 3]. Hypo- and hyperkalemia might, therefore, represent a direct risk of lethal cardiovascular complication but also an indirect biomarker of the severity of the underlying disease (i.e., neurohormonal activation or renal dysfunction) [4]. Several treatments administered to heart failure patients also interact with sK+ (e.g., non-potassium sparing diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists aldosterone) and lead to a risk of hyperkalemia that may curb their prescription [5,6,7,8,9]. Furthermore, very little data are yet available on the interaction between chronic medications and dyskalemia on prognosis [10]. The objective of this study was to describe the association between sK+ at hospital admission and 90-day mortality in patients with AHF, and the interaction of treatment on this association.

Methods

The study population was derived from the GREAT registry, an international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort of adult patients with AHF as the main diagnosis at hospital admission. Details on the constitution of the GREAT registry have been previously described in detail [11, 12]. We defined patients as eligible if they were identified as presenting with AHF and had their potassium level measured on arrival at the emergency department. All patients had AHF according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Both patients with new-onset (i.e., no history) heart failure (HF) and with decompensated chronic HF were included. Small centers (which included < 250 patients) were not included for the homogeneity of the cohort. The principal investigators for each study submitted hospital patient-level data from admission. 21,865 patients are part of the GREAT network registries from 19 centers in 16 countries of 4 continents. After serial exclusion of patients for outcome and serum K+ on admission missing data and from small recruitment centers, 15,954 patients formed the final cohort (Supplemental Digital Content—Fig. 1). Clinical details of presentation (medication use, hemodynamics, comorbidities), as well as demographic, echocardiographic, and biochemical data on admission were recorded prospectively in each cohort, with prospective adjudication of outcomes. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease formula. Normal range of potassium level across centers were 3.5 (CI 95% 3.5–3.5) and upper limit of 5.1 (CI 95% 4.9–5.5) mmol/L. Outcomes were assessed at 90 days by medical chart review at each institution. Local institutional review boards/ethics committees approved all study procedures.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of serum potassium level on admission (a) and relationship between potassium serum level on admission and probability of death at 90 days. Results presented in median (IC 95%). The U-shape curve indicated an increased risk of death associated with both hypo- and hyperkalemia with a narrow range of K+ serum (3.5–4.5 mmol/L) centered on sK+ = 4 mmol/L associated with the lowest risk of death (b)

Statistical analysis

Baseline demographic characteristics were expressed as median and interquartile range or frequency, and were compared using nonparametric techniques for continuous data (e.g., Wilcoxon or Kruskal–Wallis test) or chi-square testing for categorical covariates. The primary outcome of our study was all-cause mortality at 90 days post-discharge. Survival time was calculated from the date of admission until the date of death, or the last follow-up. Survival time was calculated from the date of admission until the date of death or last follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate effects for each covariate on mortality. Variables included in the multivariate models for adjustment were gender, age, hyponatremia (defined as natremia at admission < 136 mmol/L), hyperglycemia (defined as glycemia at admission > 7 mmol/L), eGFR (dichotomized around 60 ml/min/1.73 m²), systolic and diastolic blood pressure at presentation, diabetes, history of heart failure, coronary artery disease and history of atrial fibrillation. We also took into account the region of origin. These factors were chosen because of their previously published association with outcome in patients with ADHF and their statistical association with mortality in univariate analysis in the present cohort. Proportional hazards assumptions were verified. The log-linearity of the effect of kalemia at admission was assessed in all patients and subgroups of patients for 90-day mortality using restricted cubic spline function. Hyper- and hypokalemia cut-off values were not predefined but prospectively defined as the value of kalemia associated with the lowest mortality ± 0.5 mmol/L. Our study was composed of a worldwide sample of patients with AHF; given that patients were included from various centers, a potential cluster effect was taken into account in the models. In addition, several subgroups were pre-defined based on kidney function at admission and on chronic treatment of the patients. Three subgroups of kidney function were defined as eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m², eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m² and eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m². In addition, several subgroups were pre-defined based on kidney function and on chronic treatment. The chronic treatments considered were RASi (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ACE-i; angiotensin receptor blockers, ARB; beta blockers, BB; mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, MRA) and loop diuretics. Last, the association between kalemia and mortality was assessed separately in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and in those with altered LVEF.

We adjusted for all covariates specified in the main multivariable Cox regression model for these subgroup analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using R (version 2.15.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). A 2-sided p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Study population

Patients presenting with hyperkalemia, as defined by serum potassium > 4.5 mmol/L, had lower glomerular filtration rate and more frequently had a history of heart failure. They had higher plasma brain natriuretic peptide on admission and hyperglycemia, both prognostic factors of poor outcome in heart failure patients suggesting more advanced heart failure compared to patients admitted with hypo- or normokalemia. Hemodynamics parameters were slightly but significantly different in patients with hyperkalemia with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. Characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of patients included in the study,

Association between serum potassium level and 90-day mortality

Figure 1 shows the linear relationships between 90-day mortality and hyper- (above 4.5 mmol/L) and hypo-kalemia (below 3.5 mmol/L). The hazard ratio for death was 1.46 [1.34–1.58] for hyperkalemia and 1.22 [1.06–1.40] for hypokalemia, both versus normokalemia (Fig. 2). However, in a fully adjusted model taking into account potential confounding factors associated with poor outcome (see methods for details) only hyperkalemia remained associated with mortality, 1.03 [1.02–1.04] for 0.1 mmol/l changes of sK+ above 4.5 mmol/L and not hypokaliemia (HR 1.03 [0.98–1.09] for 0.1 mmol/l changes of sK+ below 3.5 mmol/L) (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–meier curves showing survival curves in patients with hypokalemia (K+ < 3.5 mmol/L), normokalemia (K+ 3.5–4.5 mmol/L) and hyperkalemia (K+ > 4.5 mmol/L)

Table 2 Hazard ratio of hyper and hypokalemia for 90-day mortality

Influence of LVEF or renal function on the relationship between increased sK+ and short-term outcome

In univariate analysis, an association between hyperkalemia and mortality exists only in patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The threshold of the association between potassium level and poor outcome appears to be higher (i.e., 5 mmom/L) in patients with severe renal dysfunction (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) (Fig. 3). LVEF had no impact on the incidence of hyperkalemia on association with outcome.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Graphical representation of the relationship between serum potassium level and risk of death according to renal function at admission (a), diuretics (b), RASi (c), left ventricular ejection fraction (d), mineralocorticoid receptors antagonists (e) and B-blockers (f). eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HFrEF heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, HFpEF heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, RASi renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors (i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers); BB BBs, MRA mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

Influence of chronic heart failure medications on the relationship between increased sK+ and outcome

Patients’ treatment rates with ACE-i, ARB, MRA, and BB were no different as compared with normo-, hypo- or hyper kalemia (Table 1). However, patients with hyperkalemia received diuretics and nitrate more often, as would be consistent with more advanced heart failure.

Figure 3 shows that the association between hyperkalemia and mortality remained when acute heart failure patients were treated or not with oral RASi, MRA or loop diuretics on admission, but was not observed when patients were treated with oral BB. Effects of heart failure medications on the association between low sK+ and short-term outcomes are shown in Table 2. Table 2 confirms that, even after adjustment for potential confounding factors, the association between hyperkalemia and short-term mortality remained significant with all heart failure medications except oral BB on admission.

Discussion

In this study, we observed that sK+ was associated with 90-day mortality in a U-shaped curve linking mortality and sK + in acute heart failure patients. However, only hyperkalemia (> 4.5 mmol/L), but not hypokalemia (< 3.5 mmol/L), remained a risk factor of short-term death after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Patients with normal renal function seem not to be exposed to risks of hyperkalemia, while most chronic heart failure medications did not alter the negative association between outcome and high sK+, except in patients on BB for whom high sK+ was not a risk factor of short-term death.

Association between hypokalemia and outcome

Low sK+ has long been recognized as a risk of death in heart failure patients. Korgaonkar et al [13], in a cohort of 820 patients with chronic renal failure observed an increased in mortality risk with hypokalemia. In this line, Ahmed et al [10], observed an increased risk of mortality in heart failure patients with low sK+. Interestingly, scales have been proposed for risk stratification (7- and 30-day mortality, respectively) of patients with AHF at emergency departments arrival, including potassium among the variables needed to calculate the score in a very similar way that we have found in the present study: both confer a worse prognosis, with hyperkalemia having a most detrimental impact on it [14]. In addition, association between sK+ < 4 mmol/L and prognosis was found in two large cohorts of chronic heart failure patients with chronic renal failure after matching with a propensity score [15, 16], suggesting that hypokalemia could be a marker of severity of heart failure rather than a causal factor of death. This assumption is reinforced by the fact that potassium-sparing treatments such MRA may improve survival, unlike potassium supplementation [5, 17]. Others, however, raised concerns regarding risk of arrhythmia, sudden deaths and vascular effects with hypokalemia [18]. The non-significant association between hypokalemia and mortality after adjustment for confounding factors in our study also strongly suggested that hypokalemia may represent a marker of disease severity rather than an independent factor of poor outcome in heart failure.

Association between hyperkalemia and outcome

Less common are studies linking hyperkalemia and the risk of death in heart failure patients. In our study, we observed that the sK+ threshold for poor outcome is lower than usually proposed as a definition of hyperkalemia. The risk of dying increased by 3% per 0.1 mmol/L increase in serum potassium level which appears clinically significant. This suggests that definition for hyperkalemia with sK+ > 5–5.5 mmol/L might be too restrictive [18]. Ahmed et al. have demonstrated an increased risk of death with sK+ > 5–5.5 mmol/L in a cohort of chronic heart failure after adjustment with a propensity score analysis [19]. Altered renal function at admission appears to affect the relationship between high sK+ and mortality in 2 ways. First, the relationship between high sK+ and increased short-term mortality was only seen in acute heart failure patients with impaired renal function (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2). Second, the presence of severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) appeared to right shift the slope of the association between sK+ and mortality (about 0.5 mmol/L). Those findings could be related to hyperkalemia tolerance when sK+ is chronically elevated. The association between high sK+ and mortality remained after adjustment for potential confounding factors suggesting that serum potassium greater than 4.5 mmol/L is a risk factor of short-term death in acute heart failure.

Impact of chronic medications on the association between serum potassium level and outcome

Significant information provided by our study is the influence of chronic heart failure therapies, most of which are known to affect sK+, on the relationship between mortality and sK+. Several authors have shown that chronic treatment by MRA is associated with a moderate increase in sK+ in heart failure patients [2, 20]. Likewise, chronic administration of ACE inhibitors or ARB was already described as a risk factor of hyperkalemia in heart failure patients. The consequences of a rise of sK+ on the prognosis of patients with acute heart failure, however, have not been thoroughly explored.

In our study, taking into account potential confounding factors associated with poor outcome, only hyperkalemia remained associated with mortality in patients with altered eGFR. Our study also showed that though no causal relationship can be drawn from this observational data, treatment with BB might counteract the detrimental effect of dyskalemia on outcome, suggesting a protective effect of BB toward hyperkalemia. This might, at least partly explain, the striking benefits of BB on short-term outcome in AHF patients previously described [21, 22]. Our study has several limitations. First, we cannot exclude pseudo-hyperkalemia in some patients. However, the size of the cohort reduces the risk of error when interpreting the results in reducing this noise. Only renal function and sK+ values at hospital admission were available and the values prior to admission were unknown. Also, the mechanism of hyperkalemia (i.e., transfer or renal excretion deficit) could not be explored. It is possible that mechanisms influence the prognosis of hyperkalemia. We acknowledge that adhesion to guidelines regarding treatment of heart failure was low, especially regarding the use of B-blockers (only 40% of patients were treated with B-blockers) [23]. This observation was similar to recently published low adherence to guidelines in heart failure patients [24,25,26]. Potassium intake was not available in this registry. Finally, therapeutic strategies implemented during hospitalization and changes in serum potassium during the hospital stay were not known. However, it should be noted that Khan et al. studied the impact on prognosis relative to changes in serum potassium during hospitalization among AHF patients from the EVEREST trial, and did not detect any impact on mortality [20].

To conclude, after adjustment we observed an association between admission hyperkalemia > 4.5 mmol/L and 90 day mortality in AHF patients, suggesting that current definitions of hyperkalemia might be too restrictive. This association was not observed in patients treated with B-Blockers, even after adjustment on potential confounding factors. B-blockers may have potentially a protective effect in the setting of hyperkalemia.