Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Scope of the problem
Despite the significant activity of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) on superficial bladder cancer, most patients eventually relapse. Even in the case of carcinoma in situ (CIS), where BCG is the undisputed superior intravesical agent, after up to 2 cycles of BCG therapy only 46.7% of all patients are disease free at 3.6 years median follow-up [1]. In countries where BCG is used as the predominant first line agent even for papillary disease it is expected that the BCG failure population accumulates in the prevalence pool, accounting for at least an estimated 50,000 cases in the United States alone.
Need for clear definitions of BCG failure
Herr and Dalbagni aptly noted that comparisons between therapies for BCG failure patients have been hampered by the lack of standard definitions for BCG failure and BCG-refractory transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) [2]. Some series have defined BCG failure after a single induction course of BCG [3, 4], others after two courses [5]. In addition, the methods of reporting the results have been inconsistent. Most studies have included all patients who received one or more courses of BCG [6–8]. Investigators have often combined patients with persistent disease (non-responders) and patients with recurrent disease after an initial response [3–5] and a few studies have combined patients who were non-responders to BCG and patients who could not complete BCG therapy because of toxicity (BCG intolerant) [5, 6]. Finally, most studies did not indicate the disease-free interval after the last BCG course. These inconsistencies have led to comparisons of outcome in a very heterogeneous population.
In the most general sense any recurrent disease after initiation of BCG therapy can be referred to as “BCG failure.” However, to provide more uniformity in reporting, the following alternative descriptive terms for specific types of BCG failure should be used whenever possible:
BCG refractory
Failure to achieve a disease-free state by 6 months after initial BCG therapy with either maintenance or re-treatment at 3 months due to either persistent or rapidly recurrent disease. Also includes any progression in stage, grade, or disease extent by 3 months after first cycle of BCG, i.e., non-improving or worsening disease despite BCG.
BCG resistant
Recurrence or persistence of disease at 3 months after induction cycle but of lesser degree, stage or grade which subsequently is no longer present at 6 months from BCG re-treatment ± TUR, i.e., disease improves then resolves with further BCG.
BCG relapsing
Recurrence of disease after achieving a disease-free status by 6 months, i.e., disease resolves after BCG then returns. Relapse is further defined by time of recurrence: early (within 12 months); intermediate (12–24 months); late (>24 months). Caution: relapsing disease while on active maintenance (within 3 months) may qualify as BCG refractory.
BCG intolerant
Disease recurrence after a less than adequate course of therapy is applied due to a serious adverse event or symptomatic intolerance that mandates discontinuation of further BCG, i.e., recurrent disease in setting of inadequate BCG treatment from drug toxicity.
Treatment options
BCG regimen adjustment
Several changes in the regimen of BCG administration have been explored to lessen the negative impact of BCG-related side effects for previous BCG intolerant patients. These changes include decreasing the dose of BCG to one-third or less [9], spacing the intervals between successive treatment to 2 weeks instead of 1 week [10], and decreasing the dwell time for BCG to as little as 30 min [11]. In most cases the incidence of significant side effects can be decreased 30–50% by any one of these manipulations. A combination of changes may be necessary for particularly difficult cases. Additional actions to improve or control symptomatology include administration of a fluoroquinolone antibiotic at 6 and 12 h after each BCG dose [12] or the use of NSAID or Cox-2 inhibitor drugs that may also potentiate favorable BCG immune responses [13]. The previous held belief that pain is necessary to achieve therapeutic BCG antitumor activity has been debunked by a recent large multicenter study [14].
Repeat BCG treatment
Possibly appropriate for both BCG resistant and BCG relapsing disease, the success of a second course of BCG has not been extensively reported and only a few published studies have specifically addressed this issue [15–19] (Table 1). Overall, about 35% of patients failing the first course of BCG achieve durable success with another BCG cycle. However, further courses of BCG are not recommended because of the reduced chance of success (<20%) coupled with the increased likelihood of tumor progression [21, 22]. Unfortunately there is insufficient data to assess the effectiveness of repeated BCG in refractory patients or those with recurrent T1 disease.
Standard intravesical chemotherapy
Of the various standard intravesical chemotherapeutic agents (thiotepa, adriamycin, and mitomycin), there is only minimal reported experience with their use in patients failing prior BCG. Malmstrom et al. reported a 19% 3-year disease-free rate amongst intermediate-high risk patients treated with mitomycin who had failed a prior first induction cycle of BCG [23]. Similarly, there is little data on the newer anthracycline derivative valrubicin, despite the fact that it was approved by the US FDA for BCG refractory patients with CIS. Of 90 valrubicin-treated patients with CIS ± papillary TCC who had failed at least 2 cycles of prior intravesical therapy, most commonly BCG, only 21% had a complete response at 6 months and 8% by 24 months [24]. An additional 16% of patients had reduction to stage Ta disease, the long-term significance of which is unknown. Notably, all five patients with stage T1 disease (previously resected) plus CIS failed to achieve a complete response at all. Given these poor results, it appears that conventional intravesical chemotherapy has little to offer patients failing BCG, especially with stage T1 or CIS disease.
Interferon-alpha immunotherapy
The long-term (>2 year) success rate of IFN-α monotherapy of BCG failure patients (CIS and/or papillary TCC) is generally under 15% [25]. Furthermore, in a study of IFN-α monotherapy for primary stage T1 disease, IFN-α was found to be no better than water placebo at 43 months’ follow-up, suggesting it has no role for recurrent stage T1 disease [26].
Combination BCG plus IFN-α
Several single institutional studies have demonstrated that the combination of low-dose BCG plus IFN-α may be useful as a salvage regimen in BCG failures [7, 8, 27, 28]. With follow-up ranging from 12 to 30 months, disease-free rates were in the range of 50–60% even in patients with recurrent T1 disease. Furthermore, no patient having an expedient cystectomy after BCG + IFN failure had unresectable or metastatic disease [7, 8, 29]. Results from a much larger group of 467 BCG failure patients in a multi-institutional study have revealed an overall 45% freedom from disease rate at 24-month median follow-up [30]. Importantly, among BCG failures, multivariate analysis has revealed that the response likelihood is based on both number of prior BCG (but not chemotherapy) failures as well as the relapse interval between BCG failures [31]. Over half of the patients failing one cycle of prior BCG are disease-free at 2 years, with 45% disease-free at 3 years (Fig. 1). The results are especially good for CIS single BCG failures with a 3-year complete-response rate of 54%, essentially identical to the 56% found in CIS patients receiving BCG plus interferon the first time. However, after two prior BCG failures, salvage therapy with low-dose BCG plus interferon remains limited, especially for CIS patients (2-year complete-response only 24%) versus papillary patients (35%) [32]. The situation is modified greatly by the interval from prior BCG failure whereby refractory (<6-month relapse) patients do much worse, but patients relapsing >12 months have 2-year disease-free rates approaching 60%. Other negative prognostic factors found to be important in multivariate analysis included age >80, stage T1 disease, >5 tumors, and tumor size >5 cm. Unfortunately, these studies to date were not made with direct comparison to BCG without the addition of IFN. Still, considering the magnitude and durability of the response, this therapy should be considered for BCG resistant and BCG relapsing patients. It should not be advocated for true BCG refractory disease, especially in patients with high-grade stage T1 disease or CIS.
Technological advances in standard intravesical chemotherapeutic drug delivery
Better delivery of standard intravesical chemotherapeutic agents has the potential to improve outcome in high-risk patients and is just beginning to be applied to BCG failure patients. Currently there are two competing technologies undergoing clinical trials that may result in resurgence in the use of intravesical chemotherapy after BCG failure.
Local microwave hyperthermia in conjunction with mitomycin C [(MMC) 20 mg/50 cc] was compared in a multicenter randomized trial to intravesical MMC alone in 83 patients [33]. Hyperthermia was delivered at a temperature of 42°C for at least 40 min. At a minimum follow-up of 24 months, there was a statistically significant reduction in recurrences between the two groups: 17.1% for chemothermotherapy versus 57.5% for chemotherapy alone. This modality has also been used in treating patients with high-grade superficial bladder cancer (Ta T1 G3) as a prophylactic (40 mg MMC) or ablative (80 mg MMC) protocol [34]. In 24 patients administered the prophylactic protocol, 62.5% were recurrence-free after a mean follow-up of 35.3 months. The ablative protocol was administered to 28 patients with complete ablation of the tumor in 75% and a recurrence-free rate of 80.9% at a mean follow-up of 20 months. An preliminary report of this technology in intermediate and higher-risk patients, 45% of which were prior BCG failures, revealed a 75% disease-free rate at 2 years [35].
Electromotive intravesical mitomycin C (eMMC) has been proposed to improve drug delivery across biological membranes with increased accumulation in bladder tissue. In a trial involving patients with CIS, three groups were randomized to 40 mg eMMC instillation with 20 mA electric current for 30 min, 40 mg passive MMC with a dwell time of 60 min or 81 mg BCG with a dwell time of 120 min [36]. Patients were scheduled for an initial six weekly treatments, a further 6 weekly treatments for non-responders and a follow-up of ten monthly treatments for responders. There was a statistically significant superior complete response rate at 6 months for eMMC (58%) compared to passive MMC (31%). The response rate of eMMC approached that of BCG (64%). Peak plasma MMC was significantly higher following eMMC than after passive MMC (43 ng/ml vs. 8 ng/ml), supporting the hypothesis that electromotive MMC increases tissue levels.
New intravesical chemotherapeutic drugs
Recently, two newer cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs, gemcitabine and docetaxel, with known systemic activity against advanced bladder cancer, have been tried in the intravesical route (Platinum derivatives have also been tried but were generally too irritating and associated with occasional fatal anaphylaxis [37]). As non-vesicants (agents that do not cause contact tissue injury), both gemcitabine and docetaxel have been generally well tolerated with minimal induction of cystitis and little systemic absorption. The exception has been in multiply previously treated patients where gemcitabine intolerance was seen in 8 of 64 (13%) patients, necessitating withdrawal [38]. Activity against marker lesions and primary and previous refractory tumors has been demonstrated in multiple phases I and II trials with gemcitabine [39]. Several early reports have demonstrated modestly high levels of complete responses (30–50%) in patients with otherwise BCG refractory disease [40–42]. However, in the largest and most dose-intensive regimen with the longest follow-up, the 1-year complete-response rate was only 21%, suggesting that single-agent gemcitabine will not likely meet its role as a universal salvage drug. Yet limited results have been reported for docetaxel. In 18 patients, most of whom had failed other therapies, six patients were disease-free at a 14-month median follow-up (33%) [43, 44]. Docetaxel was very well tolerated.
Combination drug strategies
While multi-agent chemotherapy has become the norm in almost all cases of systemic chemotherapy, previous attempts to use combined or alternating older chemotherapy drugs, such as adriamycin and mitomycin intravesically, were frustrated by severe cystitis despite some evidence of enhanced activity [45]. However, combinations of drugs in which one or both are non-vesicants may be better received. One such combination of immediate sequential gemcitabine followed by mitomycin reported a near 50% recurrence-free rate in 27 BCG refractory patients at 18 months compared to 20% with gemcitabine alone in 12 similar patients [46]. Further study with yet other combinations of the non-vesicants, gemcitabine and docetaxel, appear to be justified.
Other alternatives
External beam radiation therapy with or without systemic chemotherapy is rarely appropriate for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer because it may cause significant morbidity while displaying limited efficacy. CIS is particularly resistant and low-grade disease responds more poorly than higher-grade disease. Some benefit may be derived for patients with stage T1 G3 tumors with radiochemotherapy following a complete TURBT with a 5-year reported survival of 76% [47]. Photodynamic therapy using hematoporphyrin derivatives can achieve a high initial complete response rate especially against CIS but generalized cutaneous photosensitivity remains limiting [48]. Moreover, severe local irritative symptoms persisting for months are not uncommon as well as occasional severe loss in bladder capacity. Newer, better-tolerated photoporphorins are under development but such therapy is still only available at very few select centers [49].
BCG failure and cystectomy
The American Urological Association’s Bladder Cancer Clinical Guidelines Panel concluded that cystectomy or further intravesical therapy may be considered for CIS or high grade T1 cancer that persists or recurs after initial intravesical treatment [50]. This same opinion was echoed by two independent panels of international consultants on bladder tumors [51, 52]. It has been shown that after BCG failure, each additional course of BCG carries a 7% actuarial risk of progression [22]. Reports from various BCG treatment series involving aggressive superficial TCC report a median time to progression averaging 24 months with rare occurrences before 6 months [52]. Another study showed that tumor response at 6 months was the single most important point for predicting ultimate failure and progression [53]. This corresponds to the use of up to two series of 6-week induction treatments with BCG. Thus, recurrent aggressive disease 6 months after diagnosis or disease persisting after two courses of BCG therapy is a strong indication to consider radical therapy.
Patients who fail BCG and wish to have conservative treatment for their recurrent disease should be stratified according to their risk of progression. Those with T1 high-grade disease and CIS are at high risk of progression and should be cautioned on the risk of progression while second-line therapy is contemplated. Patients with Ta low-grade disease are at low risk of progression and may have second-line therapy without compromising their survival. Patients with Ta high-grade disease have a similar progression risk as those with T1 tumors [54]. There are also certain other features that convey a greater risk of ultimate failure: multifocal disease, failure to ever achieve a complete response (refractory disease), and prostatic urethral involvement [55, 56]. In these cases, failure to respond to even a single course of BCG may justify early radical therapy. Reliable prognostic tumor markers that identify patients at risk of progression after BCG failure are still lacking [57].
While all conservative treatments for BCG failure patients remain investigational and uncertain, cystectomy remains the treatment of choice. However, some patients are not candidates for radical surgery due to comorbid medical illness and others refuse to consider the change in their lifestyle that the surgery entails despite being counseled about the risks. It is for this group of patients that the urologist will exhaust all possibilities to avoid radical surgery. Furthermore, radical cystectomy is associated with 28% morbidity and 2.5% mortality [58]. This, among other reasons, could explain why a survey of 105 practicing US urologists on treatment preferences of superficial bladder cancer showed that only 19% would treat high grade Ta-T1 disease that has failed BCG twice with radical therapy [59]. For those who are good surgical candidates, the timing of cystectomy is an important consideration. A non-randomized study has shown that patients with high-risk superficial bladder cancer failing BCG therapy have improved survival with an earlier rather than a delayed cystectomy [60]. Unfortunately, there have been no prospective randomized trials comparing cystectomy to second-line intravesical therapy for high-risk superficial bladder cancer patients. Thus, while alternative therapy continues to be actively developed, cystectomy remains the standard of care for high-risk patients with BCG failure.
Conclusions
Patients failing BCG are becoming an ever-increasing problem. Failures due to BCG intolerance can often be managed by several regimen adjustments to maintain tolerance. For single course BCG failures or late relapsers, the addition of interferon to BCG has proven very effective. However, patients with high-risk superficial bladder cancer refractory to BCG are also at high risk for progression and must be counseled accordingly. For those who are good surgical candidates, cystectomy remains the treatment of choice and should not be delayed. New treatment modalities are evolving and may be considered for select intermediate risk patients or those who either cannot or will not consider a cystectomy. Technological advances in chemotherapy drug delivery with microwave or electromotive adjuncts are showing promise. Likewise, the new intravesical drugs gemcitabine and docetaxel are demonstrating activity from phases I and II trials with further encouraging data emerging from combination strategies.
References
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Witjes JA, Kurth K (2005) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin versus chemotherapy for the intravesical treatment of patients with carcinoma in situ of the bladder: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol 174:86–91
Herr HW, Dalbagni G (2003) Defining bacillus Calmette-Guerin refractory superficial bladder tumors. J Urol 169:1706–1708
Klein EA, Rogatko A, Herr HW (1992) Management of local bacillus Calmette-Guerin failures in superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 147:601–605
Glashan RW (1990) A randomized controlled study of intravesical alpha-2b-interferon in carcinoma in situ of the bladder. J Urol 144:658–661
Sarosdy MF, Manyak MJ, Sagalowsky AI, et al (1998) Oral bropirimine immunotherapy of bladder carcinoma in situ after prior intravesical bacille Calmette-Guerin. Urology 51:226–231
Dalbagni G, Russo P, Sheinfeld J, et al (2002) Phase I trial of intravesical gemcitabine in bacillus Calmette-Guerin-refractory transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Clin Oncol 20:3193–3198
O’Donnell MA, Krohn J, DeWolf WC (2001) Salvage intravesical therapy with interferon-alpha 2b plus low dose bacillus Calmette-Guerin is effective in patients with superficial bladder cancer in whom bacillus Calmette-Guerin alone previously failed. J Urol 166:1300–1304
Luciani LG, Neulander E, Murphy WM, et al (2001) Risk of continued intravesical therapy and delayed cystectomy in BCG-refractory superficial bladder cancer: an investigational approach. Urology 58:376–379
Martinez-Pineiro JA, Martinez-Pineiro L, Solsona E, et al (2005) Has a 3-fold decreased dose of bacillus Calmette-Guerin the same efficacy against recurrences and progression of T1G3 and Tis bladder tumors than the standard dose? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 174:1242–1247
Bassi P, Spinadin R, Carando R, et al (2000) Modified induction course: a solution to side-effects? Eur Urol 37(Suppl 1):31–32
Andius P, Fehrling M, Holmang S (2005) Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy: experience with a reduced dwell-time in patients with pronounced side-effects. BJU Int 96:1290–1293
Rischmann P, Colombel M, Chopin DK, et al (2006) Prophylactic ofloxacin to improve tolerance of BCG intravesical instillations: a randomised prospective, double blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study in patients with mid to high risk superficial bladder tumors. J Urol 175(Suppl 4):269 (abstract 835)
Dovedi SJ, Kirby JA, Atkins H, et al (2005) Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition: a potential mechanism for increasing the efficacy of bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy for bladder cancer. J Urol 174:332–337
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, et al (2003) The side effects of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of Ta T1 bladder cancer do not predict its efficacy: results from a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Group Phase III Trial. Eur Urol 44:423–428
Merz VW, Marth D, Kraft R, et al (1995) Analysis of early failures after intravesical instillation therapy with bacille Calmette-Guerin for carcinoma in situ of the bladder. Br J Urol 75:180–184
Bretton PR, Herr HW, Kimmel M, et al (1990) The response of patients with superficial bladder cancer to a second course of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin. J Urol 143:710–713
Nadler RB, Catalona WJ, Hudson M, et al (1994) Durability of the tumor-free response for intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. J Urol 152:367–373
Yamada Y, Hara I, Kumano M, et al (2005) Is second course intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy for recurrent carcinoma in situ of the bladder useful? Hinyokika Kiyo 51:539–543
Ovesen H, Poulsen AL, Steven K (1993) Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin with the Danish strain for treatment of carcinoma in situ of the bladder. Br J Urol 72:744–748
Brake M, Loertzer H, Horsch R, et al (2000) Long-term results of inrravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy for stage T1 superficial bladder cancer. Urology 55:673–678
Pansadoro V, De Paula F (1987) Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 138:299–301
Catalona WJ, Hudson MA, Gillen DP, et al (1987) Risks and benefits of repeated courses of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy for superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 137:220–224
Malmstrom PU, Wijkstrom H, Lundholm C, et al (1999) 5-year followup of a randomized prospective study comparing mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guerin in patients with superficial bladder carcinoma. Swedish-Norwegian Bladder Cancer Study Group. J Urol 161:1124–1127
Steinberg G, Bahnson R, Brosman S, et al (2000) Efficacy and safety of valrubicin for the treatment of bacillus Calmette-Guerin refractory carcinoma in situ of the bladder. J Urol 163:761–767
Belldegrun AS, Franklin JR, O’Donnell MA, et al (1998) Superficial bladder cancer: the role of interferon-alpha. J Urol 159:1793–1801
Portillo J, Martin B, Hernandez R, et al (1997) Results at 43 months’ follow-up of a double-blind, randomized, prospective clinical trial using intravesical interferon alpha-2b in the prophylaxis of stage pT1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urology 49:187–190
Punnen SP, Chin JL, Jewett MA (2003) Management of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) refractory superficial bladder cancer: results with intravesical BCG and Interferon combination therapy. Can J Urol 10:1790–1795
Lam JS, Benson MC, O’Donnell MA, et al (2003) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin plus interferon-alpha2B intravesical therapy maintains an extended treatment plan for superficial bladder cancer with minimal toxicity. Urol Oncol 21:354–360
Sawczuk IS, Munver R, Fromer DL, et al (2006) Intravesical BCG and interferon-alpha 2B therapy prior to cystectomy does not impact negatively on survival in patients with recurrent superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 175(Suppl 4):404 (abstract 1255)
Joudi FN, Smith BJ, O’Donnell MA, et al (2006) Final results from a national multicenter phase II trial of combination bacillus Calmette-Guérin plus interferon alpha-2B for reducing recurrence of superficial bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 24:344–348
Gallagher BL, Joudi FN, O’Donnell MA (2006) Response to intravesical immunotherapy in BCG naïve and BCG treated patients. J Urol 175(Suppl 4):268 (abstract 831)
Maymi JL, O’Donnell MA, the National BCG/Interferon Investigator Group (2005) Factors affecting response to BCG plus interferon in patients with urothelial carcinoma in situ. J Urol 173(Suppl 4):248 (abstract 918)
Colombo R, Da Pozzo LF, Salonia A, et al (2003) Multicentric study comparing intravesical chemotherapy alone and with local microwave hyperthermia for prophylaxis of recurrence of superficial transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:4270–4276
Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Pode D, et al (2004) Combined local bladder hyperthermia and intravesical chemotherapy for the treatment of high-grade superficial bladder cancer. Urology 63:466–471
van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LA, Gofrit ON, et al (2004) Preliminary European results of local microwave hyperthermia and chemotherapy treatment in intermediate or high risk superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 46:65–71
Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Stephen RL, et al (2003) Intravesical electromotive mitomycin C versus passive transport mitomycin C for high risk superficial bladder cancer: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 170:777–782
Bouffioux C, Denis L, Oosterlinck W, et al (1992) Adjuvant chemotherapy of recurrent superficial transitional cell carcinoma: results of a European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer randomized trial comparing intravesical instillation of thiotepa, doxorubicin and cisplatin. J Urol 148:297–301
Morabito F, Rossi R, Graziano ME, et al (2006) Multicenter study on the use of gemcitabine to prevent recurrence of multiple-recurring superficial bladder tumors following intravesical antiblastic agents and/or BCG: evaluation of tolerance. Arch Ital Urol Androl 78:1–4
Gontero P, Frea B (2006) Actual experience and future development of gemcitabine in superficial bladder cancer. Ann Oncol 17(Suppl 5):v123–v128
Bassi P, De Marco V, Tavolini IM, et al (2005) Pharmacokinetic study of intravesical gemcitabine in carcinoma in situ of the bladder refractory to bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. Urol Int 75:309–313
Gacci M, Bartoletti R, Cai T, et al (2006) Intravesical gemcitabine in BCG-refractory T1G3 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a pilot study. Urol Int 76:106–111
Dalbagni G, Russo P, Bochner B, et al (2006) Phase II trial of intravesical gemcitabine in bacille Calmette-Guerin-refractory transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Clin Oncol 24:2729–2734
McKiernan JM, Murphy AM, Goetzl M, et al (2005) Phase I trial intravesical docetaxel (Taxotere) for recurrent superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 173(Suppl 4):247 (abstract 916)
Masson P, Murphy AM, Goetzl MA, et al (2006) Long-term follow up of intravesical docetaxel for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer resistant to standard intravesical therapy. J Urol 175(Suppl 4):273 (abstract 846)
Fukui I, Sekine H, Kihara K, et al (1989) Intravesical combination chemotherapy with mitomycin C and doxorubicin for carcinoma in situ of the bladder. J Urol 141:531–534
Maymi JL, Saltsgaver N, O’Donnell MA (2006) Intravesical sequential gemcitabine-mitomycin chemotherapy as salvage treatment for patients with refractory superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 175(Suppl 4):271 (abstract 840)
Akcetin Z, Todorov J, Tuzel E, et al (2005) Radiochemotherapy after transurethral resection is an effective treatment method in T1G3 bladder cancer. Anticancer Res 25:1623–1628
Nseyo UO, Shumaker B, Klein EA, et al (1998) Photodynamic therapy using porfimer sodium as an alternative to cystectomy in patients with refractory transitional cell carcinoma in situ of the bladder. Bladder Photofrin Study Group. J Urol 160:39–44
Marti A, Jichlinski P, Lange N, et al (2003) Comparison of aminolevulinic acid and hexylester aminolevulinate induced protoporphyrin IX distribution in human bladder cancer. J Urol 170:428–432
Smith JA Jr, Labasky RF, Cockett AT, et al (1999) Bladder cancer clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (stages Ta, T1, and TIS). The American Urological Association. J Urol 162:1697–1701
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden A, Witjes JA, et al (2005) High-grade Ta urothelial carcinoma and carcinoma in situ of the bladder. Urology 66(6 Suppl 1):90–107
Nieder AM, Brausi M, Lamm D, et al (2005) Management of stage T1 tumors of the bladder: international consensus panel. Urology 66(6 Suppl 1):108–125
Herr HW, Badalament RA, Amato DA, et al (1989) Superficial bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting tumor progression. J Urol 141:22–29
Herr H (2000) Tumor progression and survival of patients with high grade, noninvasive papillary (TaG3) bladder tumors: 15-year outcome. J Urol 163:60–62
Kurth KH, Denis L, Bouffioux C, et al (1995) Factors affecting recurrence and progression in superficial bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A:1840–1846
Huguet J, Crego M, Sabate S, et al (2005) Cystectomy in patients with high risk superficial bladder tumors who fail intravesical BCG therapy: pre-cystectomy prostate involvement as a prognostic factor. Eur Urol 48:53–59
Habuchi T, Marberger M, Droller MJ, et al (2005) Prognostic markers for bladder cancer: international consensus panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology 66(6 Suppl 1):64–74
Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19:666–675
Joudi FN, Smith BJ, O’Donnell MA, et al (2003) Contemporary management of superficial bladder cancer in the United States: a pattern of care analysis. Urology 62:1083–1088
Herr WH, Sogani PC (2001) Does early cystectomy improve the survival of patients with high risk superficial bladder tumors? J Urol 166:1296–1299
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Donnell, M.A., Boehle, A. Treatment options for BCG failures. World J Urol 24, 481–487 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0112-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0112-0