Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the research carried out over the last 25 years on the FAO56 single and basal crop coefficients of subtropical and tropical orchards and plantations of cactus pear, dragon fruit, fig, jujube, passion fruit, pomegranate, cape gooseberry, cherimoya, guava, longan, lychee, mango, papaya, acerola, carambola, cashew, cacao, coffee, jaboticaba, jatropha, macadamia, açai palm, coconut, date palm, guayule, oil palm, peach palm, ramie and rubber tree. The main objective of this review is to update standard single crop coefficients (Kc) and basal crop coefficients (Kcb) and complete the Kc and Kcb values tabulated in FAO56. Kc is the ratio between the non-stressed crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and the grass reference evapotranspiration (ETo), and Kcb is the ratio between the crop transpiration (Tc) and the ETo. When selecting and analysing the literature, only studies that used the FAO Penman–Monteith equation, or another equation well related to the former to compute ETo were considered, while ETc or Tc were obtained from accurate field measurements on crops under pristine (non-stress cropping conditions) or eustress (“good stress”) conditions. Articles meeting these conditions were selected to provide data for updating Kc and Kcb under standard conditions. The related description of orchards and plantations refers to crop cultivar and rootstock, irrigation systems and scheduling, planting spacing, fraction of ground cover (fc) by the crops, crop height (h), crop age and training systems, as Kc and Kcb values depend on these characteristics. To define the standard Kc and Kcb values of the selected crops, the values collected in the literature were compared with previously tabulated standard Kc and Kcb values. The updated tabulated values are transferable to other locations and climates and can be used to calculate and model crop water requirements, primarily for irrigation planning and scheduling, and thereby supporting of improved water use and savings, which is the overall aim of the current review.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Knowledge of the water requirements of orchards and plantations is essential for planning and management of crop water use, assessing the balance between water resources availability and demand at farm and basin level, and developing basin hydrological studies. Accuracy in evapotranspiration estimates is essential, mainly when water scarcity prevails, so breaking the trend for water over-use and, contrarily, if sustainable irrigation is a must (Pereira et al. 2009). As reviewed by Pereira (2017), considering the continuously increase on demand for food, droughts and climate change, high water use performance and productivity and water conservation and saving require improved knowledge of crop evapotranspiration and water use. Therefore, literature on management of fruit crops is extensive relative to water management and deficit irrigation (DI) but requiring further information on crop water requirements.
Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) is commonly computed or modelled using the FAO calculation procedure (Allen et al. 1998), which uses the simple Kc-ETo approach to compute ETc, i.e. the product of a crop coefficient (Kc) by the grass reference evapotranspiration (ETo). The latter is computed with the FAO-PM ETo equation (Allen et al. 1998) and is defined as the evapotranspiration rate of a (hypothetical) grass reference crop with fixed height of 0.12 m, a surface resistance of 70 s m−1 and an albedo of 0.23, closely resembling an extensive surface of green grass of uniform height, actively growing, adequately watered, and well covering the ground (Allen et al. 1998). The daily ETo equation corresponds to the Penman–Monteith combination equation parameterized for that grass crop with fixed and well defined aerodynamic and surface resistance terms (Allen et al. 1998; Pereira et al. 1999). The hourly ETo is defined by Allen et al. (2006) and the daily ETo (mm d−1) is defined with the following equation:
where Δ is the slope of the saturation vapor pressure–temperature curve at mean air temperature (kPa °C−1), (Rn − G) is the available energy at the vegetated surface (MJ m−2 d−1), γ is the psychrometric constant (kPa °C−1), T is mean daily air temperature (°C), u2 is mean daily wind speed (m s−1) at 2 m height and (es − ea) is the vapor pressure deficit (VPD) of the atmosphere (kPa). All fluxes are assumed to be vertical and horizontal local advective fluxes are not considered.
ETo incorporates most of the weather and related energy effects, thus representing the evaporative demand of the atmosphere. Standard, transferable crop coefficients must be obtained from the ratio between accurate potential ETc field measurements under non-stress or eustress conditions, and ETo computed with the FAO-PM ETo (Allen et al. 1998). Eustress (also called “good stress”) refers to crops grown under mild and controlled water stress that may favour yield quality. Hence, Kc variations should mainly be attributed to the specific crop characteristics comparatively to those of the grass reference and only for a limited extent to the climate. These conditions enable the transfer of standard Kc values between locations and climates, when local and/or regional advection is excluded, with Kc representing an integration of the effects of the main characteristics that distinguish, in terms of the energy balance, the grass reference crop from the crop under study (Allen et al. 1998; Pereira et al. 1999).
Kc values should not surpass 1.2. However, under advective conditions much larger transpiration and larger soil evaporation values may be observed (Allen et al. 2011; Evett et al. 2012b; Pereira et al. 2021a; Rallo et al. 2021). Otherwise, if advection is not considered, the energy balance reported to the crop shows that there is not enough energy for evaporation and such overestimated Kc values are due to flaws in measurements or in computations. For application in small or isolated areas of vegetation, Kc can exceed the limits for grass reference (1.2–1.4), while for large areas, or small areas surrounded by vegetation with similar roughness and soil water status, Kc values must stick to values equal or smaller than those limits (Allen et al. 2011), as also discussed in the companion paper by Pereira et al. (2023).
FAO56 (Allen et al. 1998) introduced the partition of ETc into soil evaporation (Es) and crop transpiration (Tc), i.e., ETc = Tc + Es. Thus, we also have Kc = Kcb + Ke, sum of the basal crop coefficient (Kcb) with the soil evaporation coefficient resulting Tc = Kcb ETo and Es = Ke ETo. That partition is well described by Allen et al. (1998, 2005). Important to note from now that the Kc-ETo approach is simple but requires the application of accurate measurements and computations, particularly when deriving Kc values for a crop using field observations (Allen et al. 2011; Pereira et al. 2021a, b).
The concept of standard crop coefficient (Kc) implies its determination for a non-stressed crop or a eustressed crop, when a crop is submitted to a well-controlled deficit that reduces water applied but keeping yield at an upper level (Paço et al. 2019; Rallo et al. 2021; Pereira et al. 2023). Abundant research aimed at finding strategies for controlled water deficit at given periods, or in selected modes during the crop cycle, aiming that yields are not or are less affected (Allen et al. 2011; Rallo et al. 2021). Findings have shown that the full satisfaction of crop water demand is not the best approach but an eustress that keeps yields high and quality is improved (e.g. López-Urrea et al. 2012).
Accurate standard, transferable and updated Kc values obtained from literature review require that related ETc data collection, models and model calibrations, as well as experimental set-ups, are exempt of biases caused by experimental flaws (Allen et al. 2011). Following the methodology adopted in a companion paper (Pereira et al. 2023), the selected references were checked to ensure that sufficient descriptions of ETc measurement practices, crop management and related production environment were provided. Articles were also checked to detect possible computational flaws and shortcomings in data handling or in model calibration and validation. The possible influence of advection was also considered as Kc∕Kcb values result biased and can only be used locally, thus not transferable (Allen et al. 2011; Pereira et al. 2023; Rallo et al. 2021).
The Kc-ETo method, is the most common in practice but the selected literature reports numerous applications of the Kc-ETo method using a variety of field methods as analysed in the companion paper by Pereira et al. (2023) and bibliography quoted there. Allen et al. (2011) and Evett et al. (2012a) performed sound reviews aimed at attaining good accuracy of ET data. In addition, Pereira et al. (2023) analysed other ETc field methods different of the ones commonly used for FAO Kc-ETo, also referred for tabulations of Kc/Kcb for vegetable and field crops (Pereira et al. , 2021a; b). In addition to the Kc/Kcb review studies, the new Kc/Kcb studies referred also used the determination of actual Kcb and Kc from actual field measurements of fc and h adopting the Allen and Pereira (2009) approach (A&P approach). A test of the A&P approach was performed for a variety of annual and perennial crops, so confirming the adequateness of this approach to estimate Kcb/Kc for diverse orchards and plantations (Pereira et al. 2020b, 2021c). Moreover, using actual observations and the A&P approach is useful for controlling the quality of ET measurements and for extending observed Kcb/Kc to a range of characteristics of crops, including to those not previously studied as described in Pereira et al. (2023).
The A&P approach is based on defining Kcb values along the season as a function of a density coefficient (Kd) and a Kcb at maximum plant growth near full ground cover (Kcb full). On the one hand, the Kd describes the increase in Kcb with increasing vegetation density and amount as a function of the fraction of ground cover (fc), mean plant height (h) and a multiplier for fc eff relative to canopy density and shading (ML) as described by Allen and Pereira (2009) and Pereira et al. (2020b). ML sets an upper limit on the relative magnitude of transpiration per unit of ground area as represented by fc eff and reflects the density and thickness of the canopy. On the other hand, the Kcb full is calculated as a function of mean plant height and adjusted for both stomatal control of transpiration (Fr) and climate. The Fr parameter applies a downward adjustment (Fr ≤ 1.0) to Kcb full and consequently to Kcb, if the vegetation has stronger stomatal control of transpiration than is typical for agricultural crops. Since the parameters of the A&P approach were previously estimated, the approach was used to assure the coherence of input data as by Pereira et al. (2023).
The objective of this review paper, in line with the companion papers by Pereira et al. (2023) and López-Urrea et al. (2024) but focusing in particular on orchard perennial crops from tropical and subtropical regions, consists of (1) reviewing updated single and basal crop coefficient values (Kc and Kcb) obtained under non-stress and eustress conditions, (2) tabulating the main characteristics and Kc influencing factors relative to those crops, and (3) establishing a new set of tabulated standard and transferable Kc and Kcb coefficients ready for use in a revised version of the FAO56 guidelines, or directly from the current paper. It is underlined that focusing on crops growing under pristine or non-stress conditions, refers to crops grown without restrictions on growth and evapotranspiration caused by soil water and salinity stress, reduced crop density, pests and diseases, weed infestation, or low fertility and nutrients (Pereira et al. 2023). In addition, the study and tabulation of standard Kc and Kcb is to provide for updated information and data to support farmers, managers and researchers on estimating crop water requirements and to provide for methodologies that may lead to improve yields, control sustainability impacts of irrigation, favour water saving and cope and mitigate climate change.
Selection and analysis of the used scientific literature
For transferability purposes, FAO56 adopted the concept of standard Kc or Kcb and ETc (Allen et al. 1998), which refer to well-watered and pristine or eustress cropping conditions, that are often different from actual field conditions, frequently under-optimal due to insufficient (or non-uniform) irrigation, crop density, salinity, agronomic practices and soil management. The tabulated and, therefore, transferable values of Kc and Kcb refer to standard cropping conditions, which in case of orchards and plantations refers to adopting crop-specific eustress practices, i.e., limited stress practices that result in no or minimal reduction in maximum yield. These concepts and related terminology are progressively being accepted by the user communities (Pereira et al. 2015). However, the standard Kc and Kcb values for tree and vine crops vary with the fraction of ground cover and height (Allen and Pereira 2009; Jensen and Allen 2016; Pereira et al. 2020b) due to crop age and crop management, particularly crop training and crop density. The present review has shown that satisfactorily accurate Kc and Kcb values reported for the same crop show dissimilarity among locations, which may be due to differences in cultivar and rootstock, plant density, orchard management and pruning, training, fruit load and thinning, as well as soil properties, irrigation method and strategy, and soil-crop management practices (Minacapilli et al. 2009; Marsal et al. 2014; Rallo et al. 2021). This is also evident from the companion papers focused on Mediterranean and temperate crops (Pereira et al. 2023; López-Urrea et al. 2024). For these reasons, it has been successful to estimate actual crop coefficients from fc and h as quoted before. Kc variability due to weather is less important than causes referred above. However, a correction of Kc for climate is proposed in FAO56, but could not be used because most papers did not provide weather data on the experiment.
Literature reporting field derived crop coefficients has shown diverse objectives and used quite different methodologies with variable accuracy. The bibliography reviewed and rejected was about the double of that selected because Kc values were just for local (site-specific) use, papers reported much insufficient information about the crop itself, methods and instrumentation used, cropping practices and training, which caused serious limitations to transferability. For further information about the transferability requirements the reader is referred to Pereira et al. (2021a, 2023). Limitations in the reviewed studies were similar to those reported by Pereira et al. (2023), and included:
-
(1)
Adopting other than the standard FAO-PM-ETo equation without possibilities to be adequately converted to that one.
-
(2)
Using a Kc curve different from the standard segmented FAO Kc curve, such as a function of LAI, not allowing a clear definition of the Kc (and Kcb) values for the initial, mid-season and end-season stages, respectively Kc ini, Kc mid and Kc end. However, approximate estimations of Kc ini, Kc mid and Kc end could be made from the reported graphical or from tabulated information.
-
(3)
Using non-standard cultivation conditions, e.g., using mulch for controlling Es, or active ground cover for fighting erosion result in management-specific Kc values without comparing with a reference condition.
-
(4)
Adopting deficit irrigation practices and not providing a reference for eustress conditions, then making that the reported Kc act have only local interest.
-
(5)
Reporting insufficient data and information on the experiment, then not making it possible to assume that methods and practices were adequate.
-
(6)
Using Kc values transferred from other studies without performing an appropriate testing.
The requirements for field data quality acquisition by common methods are extensively described in Allen et al. (2011) and reviewed by Rallo et al. (2021). For instance, the commonly used techniques that recur to soil water balance methods to calculate ETc were often referred (Evett et al. 2012b; Pereira et al. 2020a). Their main sources of error arise from the non-quantification of deep percolation and/or capillary rise, or from a poor design of the sampling procedures that may not represent adequately the trees stand, or due to lack of accuracy of computation when the calibration of parameters is inadequate or the selected algorithms are not appropriate (Pereira et al. 2020a). Remote sensing is also commonly used to estimate actual ETc, using both vegetation indices (VI) and surface energy balance (SEB) models (Pôças et al. 2014, 2020; Karimi and Bastiaanssen 2015). Because orchards are discontinuous canopies that differentiate among them, namely due to crop species, planting densities, training, and soil management, remote sensing may lead to inaccuracies when results do not base upon appropriate validation using ground data.
The review focused on articles published after the FAO56 guidelines (Allen et al. 1998), until September 2023. A systematic review was conducted, initially focusing on the articles that cited FAO56 and referred to crop coefficients, using the scientific names of the target crops. Several search engines were used (e.g., Scholar google, Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, Csiro publishing, Scielo, Scopus) as well as different combination of keywords (crop coefficients, orchards, plants names and scientific names). Various languages were used for the search (English, Portuguese, Spanish, French, and Italian). Insufficiencies and inaccuracies referred before limit the transferability of reported Kc values, which obliged to operate a careful, non-automatic literature selection. Aspects referred above as causing limitations in the accuracy of reported data were carefully considered, i.e., determined rejection of available literature. Reported studies were selected when:
-
Adopted the FAO-PM-ETo equation or the ASCE-PM-ETo equation, or other ETo equation when its ratio to the FAO-PM-ETo could be approximated.
-
Presented data of two or more experimental seasons, or studies having various treatments, so that it was possible to understand if results were or not occasional. However, for crops yet not having a known Kc, a single set of data assumed with quality was accepted.
-
Descriptions of experiments sufficient to accept their accuracy and that crops were not stressed.
-
Adopted the FAO Kc curve, or a Kc-time curve that allowed to identify Kc or Kcb for, at least, the mid-season, preferably, also for the initial and end-season.
-
Papers describing field studies using Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) or eddy covariance (EC) systems that reported upon the upwind fetch conditions and the energy balance closure.
-
Papers reporting on soil water balance (SWB) methods describing all the terms of the balance, the soil profile, the sensors used and location, the frequency of observations, and the model calibration and validation.
-
Reporting on adequate setting and management of lysimeters, namely on avoiding ‘‘oasis’’ and ‘‘cloth-line’’ effects and correcting the evaporative surface when the plant canopy exceeded the lysimeter surface (“bloom effect”).
-
Studies using remote sensing describe adequate ground observations used for SEB or VI calibration/validation.
-
The reported Kc values are acceptable (Kc up to 1.30 and Kcb < Kc), unless convincing explanations were given.
The assumed criteria made it possible to select a good number of studies, developed in a variety of countries and regions and covering numerous species. The standard values of Kc and Kcb tabulated were established considering the ranges of Kc and Kcb values collected in the selected literature and the values tabulated since 1998 in FAO56 (Allen et al. 1998), Allen and Pereira (2009), Jensen and Allen (2016), and Rallo et al. (2021). That work developed in the following steps:
1st: Grouping the various studies relative to every crop considering: (i) the density of plants and spacing (DPS); (ii) the fraction of ground cover (fc); and (iii) the crop height (h).
2nd: For all the groups of papers, the ranges of Kc ini/Kcb ini, Kc mid/Kcb mid and Kc end/Kcb end were defined and included as columns of Kc and Kcb observed values in draft tables relative to every crop. For basing decisions, the ranges of previously tabulated Kc and Kcb values were also included as columns in that draft table.
3rd: Draft definition of the standard values for Kc/Kcb ini, Kc/Kcb mid and Kc/Kcb end for all crops through assessing the various ranges inscribed in each line of the draft tables relative to sets of DPS, fc, and h.
4th: Defining the standard values for Kcb ini, Kcb mid and Kcb end for all crops through the computation of the A&P approach (Allen and Pereira 2009; Pereira et al. 2020b) for every set of fc and h using the parameters ML and Fr available from Pereira et al. (2021c), or adjusting the parameters ML and Fr for not previously validated values comparatively to crops with similar characteristics.
5th: Defining the standard Kc values by summing estimated values of Ke for each stage with the defined standard Kcb ini, Kcb mid and Kcb end. The estimated values of Ke were obtained from observing the differences (Kc-Kcb) in the selected papers and in the previously published Tables with consideration of changes in Kc due to rain, and assuming a reduced soil evaporation due to using drip or micro-sprinkling under the canopies, and/or for a large plant density, and for using mulches. Young plantations are assigned with larger Ke values. Ke were assumed smaller for the mid-season, particularly for deciduous crops, and for the evergreen crops.
6th: Consolidating the draft standard Kc and Kcb through comparing all values (i) for various plant densities and ground cover fractions of the same crop; (ii) for the various crops of the same group; and (iii) between Kc and Kcb.
The tables presenting the updated standard Kcb ini, Kcb mid and Kcb end, and standard Kc ini, Kc mid and Kc end show their values in the last two columns, while the first ones are those indicating plant density and training or trellis systems, fc and h, as well as the values assumed for ML and Fr relative to the initial, mid- and end-season stages, that may be useful for further uses of the A&P approach. Ranges of observed and previously tabulated Kc ini∕Kcb ini, Kc mid∕Kcb mid and Kc end ∕Kcb end are also included for information to users.
The tabulated information on the characteristics of the orchards and plantations refer to cultivar and rootstock if applicable, the experiment location and climate, the method for determining the actual ETc (ETc act) and the reference ETo, the irrigation system and strategy used, the plant spacing and density, the training or trellis system, the age and height of trees and the fraction of ground covered by the crop (fc) or the fraction of intercepted photosynthetic active radiation (fIPAR). Other factors affecting crop water requirements, such as pruning, fruit thining and fruit load, were not considered due to lack of information on all selected studies.
Another table presents the actual Kc and Kcb values derived from field determinations of crop ET or T, and the relevant data useful in analysing these Kc and Kcb values, namely to compare Kc/Kcb data among crops of the same or similar species. These actual Kc and Kcb values were used in conjunction with the previously tabulated standard values to derive the new standard values.
The current review article focuses on subtropical and tropical tree, shrubs, and vine crops as well as palm, fiber and rubber plantations. The grouping of crops was based firstly on the climate type, on deciduous or evergreen crops. The growth habit (vine, trees, shrubs) was also considered. The tabulated data are grouped as: (1) cactus pear, dragon fruit, fig, jujube, passion fruit, and pomegranate; (2) cape gooseberry, cherimoya, guava, lychee, mango, and papaya; (3) acerola, carambola, cashew, cacao, coffee, jaboticaba, jatropha, and macadamia; (4) açai palm, coconut, date palm, guayule, oil palm, peach palm, ramie, and rubber trees.
Standard Kc and Kcb of subtropical orchards and plantations: cactus pear, dragon fruit, fig trees, jujube, passion fruit and pomegranate
This group of fruit crops includes the plants of the cactus family (cactus pear and dragon fruit), which are characterized by a special mode of photosynthesis pathway (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism, CAM) with stomata open at night and that use a temporal CO2 pump with nocturnal CO2 uptake and concentration to reduce photorespiration. CAM enables plants to have high adaptability to diverse environments, particularly the ability to tolerate abiotic stresses such as drought and extreme temperatures (Consoli et al. 2013; Kishore 2016). The characteristics of these crops relative to determining Kc and Kcb are listed in Table 1.
Cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.), or prickly pear, is a perennial crop used as food and feed, as well as for the cosmetic industry and biofuel production (Elbana et al. 2020). It can be found in semi-arid zones of North and South America, Africa and East Asia. The main cactus pear’ producer is Mexico, followed by other South America countries. Dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus (Haworth) D.R. Hunt), or pitaya, is a vine-like cactus. The main producer is Vietnam, followed by China and Central American countries.
No previous Kc values tabulation on these crops were available in FAO56 (Allen et al. 1998), and few studies were available in the literature; their characterization (Table 1) was scarce, namely relative to fc and h. Selected cactus pear plantations refer to a young (Elbana et al. 2020) and a mature plantation (Consoli et al. 2013), while only a study on a young dragon fruit plantation was selected (Batista 2022). A variety of methods was reported for measuring ETc act (drainage lysimeters, surface renewal, EC system, and SWB). In all studies, plantations were irrigated using drip or micro-sprinkler irrigation, and full, non-stressed irrigation strategies were adopted. Mild stress was only reported for short periods, thus field conditions correspond to those required for computing standard crop coefficients. Planting densities of cactus pear ranged widely, from 333 to 835 plants/ha. The fc values of the full bearing cactus, trained with a free form, reached 0.65 while the young plantation had fc = 0.35. The dragon fruit was trained on a trellis system. The actual Kc values obtained from field ET observations are presented in Table 2. The Kc values for the young cactus pears was lower than for the full bearing ones, which relates with the larger fc of the latter. The Kc values of cactus pear are small (Kc mid < 0.50) and much lower than those of the dragon fruit.
The fig crop (Ficus carica L.) is a deciduous tree grown in subtropical/tropical and warm Mediterranean climate areas. Fig trees can bear two fruit harvests in the warm season (Martínez-Macias et al. 2022). No previous standard Kc values were available in FAO56 (Allen et al. 1998). Three related studies were selected (Table 1). Two of the studies were developed in Brazil (Andrade et al. 2014; Souza et al. 2014) and the other in Mexico (Rivera et al. 2016), all measuring ETc act with SWB. Plant density ranged from 1666 to 2000 plants/ha. All orchards were drip irrigated, however adopting different irrigation strategies: full irrigation, conventional deficit irrigation and regulated deficit irrigation. Excepting short periods of time, fig trees were reported well irrigated, thus allowing to assume that datasets were appropriate for standard Kc determination.
Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) is a deciduous fruit tree native to China; its selected studies came from there (Hu et al. 2012; Sun et al. 2012). Jujube thrives in hot and dry areas (Sun et al. 2012). In commercial fields, no specific training systems are required, although pruning is particularly recommended in the first 3 years to promote branching. The selected studies refer to plant populations ranging 1111–1667 plants/ha, measuring ETc of full bearing jujube orchards (Table 1) with the SWB, to irrigating with drip and surface irrigation and adopting well-watered conditions. Both studies were conducted in fully bearing orchards having a maximum fc of 0.67. Kc values are medium to high but different between both orchards.
Passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims.) is an evergreen, fast-growing vine that reach a height of 2.20 m when adopting a trellis system trained in the vertical shoot position (VSP). Planting densities range from 555 to 1111 plants/ha. Brazil is the world’s leading producer of passionfruit, followed by other Latin-American countries. All selected studies refer to full-bearing orchards in Brazil, managed under full irrigation conditions and using drip or microsprinkling. ETc act was measured with drainage or weighing lysimeters (Silva et al. 2006; Freire et al. 2011), the SWB (Souza et al. 2009; Nogueira et al. 2014) or through testing. The main training system was VSP, with plant heights from 1.65 to 2.2 m and small fc, similar to vineyards VSP trained. Kc mid are generally high, up to 1.25.
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is a deciduous tree that grows in a variety of climates, from Mediterranean to tropical; India and China are the leading producers. The common training systems are vase and free form (Ayars et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017); however, despite that numerous studies were selected, the information about training systems was insufficient. The planting densities varied widely, from 500 to 1481 plants/ha (Table 1). Various ETc act measurement methods were reported, namely DL and WL, sap flow and the SWB. Pomegranate water requirements were met adopting full- or eustress irrigation strategies using drip irrigation. Data refers to various crop ages, plant densities, and fraction of ground cover, as well as orchard management; therefore, there is also a wide variation of Kc values but several correspond to standard ones.
Bare soil was the most common soil management of the orchards and plantations of this group (Table 2), although more than 50% of the selected papers do not report information. Only one study is reported for active ground cover (AGC), where SWB data was studied with the SIMDualKc (Rosa et al. 2012a, b), performed an identification of the partition of ETc between the fruit tree, the AGC vegetation and soil evaporation (Ramos et al. 2023).
Kc act and Kcb act values are presented in Table 2 for all crops. Despite the variability and the lack of several data, it has been possible to perceive the dependence of Kc mid and Kcb mid from fc and h, thus the age, as reported by Allen and Pereira (2009) and Pereira et al. (2020b), as well as the training systems adopted. Moreover, it was possible to verify that the four crop growth stages curve was adjustable in all cases, and it was possible to define the proposed Kc and Kcb values for the initial, mid-season and end-season, which are presented in Table 3. The Kc ini values are generally much lower than Kc mid for deciduous crops due to very low fc at the initial stage.
Very few information was available in literature relative to basal crop coefficients for those crops, with only two studies using the dual crop coefficient approach, one for jujube (Sun et al. 2012) and the other for pomegranate with the model SIMDualKc (Ramos et al. 2023). Therefore, Kcb values were estimated as Kc-0.05 or Kc-0.10 for respectively evergreen and deciduous plants following FAO56 (Allen et al. 1998).
Table 3 was built following the companion papers for fruit tree crops in Mediterranean and temperate climate regions (Pereira et al. 2023; López-Urrea et al. 2024) relating the Kc and/or Kcb standard values with the main characteristics of the orchards. These include age (young vs. mature), plant density, fc and h. Since plant density varies depending on the variety and training system, their range values in Table 3 should be considered as guidelines for users. The values of Kc and Kcb for the initial, mid- and end-season were grouped according to the fc values, plant height and plant density. fc values range from very low (fc < 0.30) in young plants (non-full bearing) to very high (fc > 0.60) in full bearing orchards or plantations. In cases where few information was available from the selected studies, indicative values for plant density commonly found in commercial orchards and plantations were adopted.
The proposed standard Kcb and Kc values are given in the last two columns of Table 3. These standard values were based on the Kcb and Kc values obtained from field measurements and proposed in the selected papers (Table 2, reproduced in Table 3) and the ranges of Kc and Kcb values previously tabulated in FAO56, Jensen and Allen (2016) and Rallo et al. (2021). This information was additionally combined with the Kcb values determined using the A&P approach (Allen and Pereira 2009; Pereira et al. 2020a, b) using the observed fc and h and the suggested parameters ML and Fr.
The tabulated standard Kc and Kcb values show an increase with the plant density, fc and height. The dragon fruit, fig tree, jujube, and pomegranate have similar ranges of Kc and Kcb for the same fc. In contrast, cactus pear has lower Kc and Kcb values for the same fc ranges of the other plants because they have a lower ET rate and the Fr parameter is significantly smaller.
Sub-tropical and tropical evergreen fruit trees: cape gooseberry, cherimoya, guava, longan, lychee, mango and papaya orchards
The characteristics of the orchards reported in the selected studies of these crops are summarized in Table 4 and the observed crop coefficients are presented in Table 5.
Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) is a ground cherry in the nightshade family (Solanaceae), and an edible fruit native to the Amazon rainforest. Main producers are Indonesia and Philippines. It is a perennial plant in the tropics and subtropics. Only a study performed in Brazil (Freitas et al. 2023) was available for the determination of Kc for cape gooseberry (Table 4). The study was performed in a drip irrigated young cape gooseberry orchard with a plant density of 16,666 plants/ha, with average height of 1.80 m; irrigation was performed to fully meet the crop water requirements. The plants were trained in a V-system. ETc act, was measured using DL and the SWB.
Cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) is a fast-growing sub-tropical tree. Spain is a leader in the production of cherimoya fruit, accounting for about 80% of world production (Durán-Zuazo et al. 2019a). The two selected studies (Rodríguez-Pleguezuelo et al. 2011; Durán-Zuazo et al. 2019a), were developed in Spain in the same full bearing orchard, vase-trained and having a plant density of 280 plants/ha. ETc act was measured using a DL and performing the SWB. The orchard was drip irrigated adopting full irrigation. (Tables 4 and 5).
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) grows in hot and humid tropics, as well as arid tropics, i.e., adapts well to a wide range of warm to hot climates. India and China are the main world producers. The selected studies (Table 4) were developed in Brazil (Teixeira et al. 2003), Cuba (Hernández-Cuello et al. 2015), and India (Singh et al. 2007; Patel and Rajput 2020; Jat et al. 2022). Field measurements of ETc act were performed with BREB and SWB, as well as testing different Kc values by comparing the respective crop yield. All studies used drip and micro-sprinkler. The plant density in the studied orchards ranged from 333 to 1000 plants/ha. No information was available regarding the training system and the plants height. Only two studies provided information relative to fc (0.50–0.66).
Longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) belongs to the Sapindaceae family, as lychee, and is mainly cultivated in subtropical regions, with China being the largest producer, followed by Thailand. Only one study was available which was developed in Thailand (Suwanlertcharoen et al. 2023). The study used the METRIC energy balance model coupled with SIMDualKc water balance model for the estimation of ETc act. The study lacks detailed information on the studied orchards.
Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) is cultivated in the limits of tropical and subtropical climates, mainly in Asia. The crop is mainly cultivated in China (600,000 ha), followed by India, Thailand and Vietnam. The available studies on the determination of Kc (Table 4) were carried out in the main growing countries (India and Thailand), two of them in full bearing orchards (Spohrer et al. 2006; Mali et al. 2015) and one study was carried out in a young orchard (Tiwari et al. 2012). The methods used to estimate the ETc act were the sap flow to assess Tc, thus determining Kcb, and testing successive Kc values relating the resulting ET with the crop yield. The irrigation was applied for fulfilling the crop water requirements using drip irrigation. The plant density ranged from 100 to 400 plants/ha. Few information was available relative to fc and h.
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is native to southern Asia but is widespread throughout the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. India is the leading producer of mango. The selected studies in Table 4 were performed in full bearing orchards of the subtropical Mediterranean climate in Spain (Rodríguez-Pleguezuelo et al. 2011; Durán-Zuazo et al. 2019b) and the tropical semi-arid and arid climates of northeast Brazil (Silva et al. 2007; Teixeira et al. 2008), North Africa (Mattar 2007) and Saudi Arabia (Mohammad et al. 2015). SWB was the most used method for measuring ETc act. The orchards were mainly drip irrigated but one study used furrow irrigation. The planting density varied from 100 to 630 plants/ha. Only a single study reported a fc value of 0.44. The plant height of some dwarf or semi-dwarf cultivars reaches only 2.5–4.0 m but the selected studies referred heights from 2.2 to 5.5 m.
Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is mainly cropped in India followed by Brazil, Indonesia, and Mexico. The period between planting and harvesting is generally around 9 months and commercial orchards last around 3–10 years. In the north-eastern region of Brazil, where two of the selected studies were conducted (Montenegro et al. 2004; Coelho et al. 2010), papaya trees are often in consociation with other perennial fruits that require a partially shaded environment, such as dwarf coconut and cacao. Table 4 presents the characteristics of the selected studies on papaya orchards with all orchards being full bearing. The measurement of ETc act was performed mainly using the SWB. In one of the studies, performed in Cuba, the SIMDualKc model was used to partition crop ET into plant transpiration and soil evaporation (Chaterlán et al. , 2012b). All orchards were full irrigated with micro-irrigation systems. Plant cultivation is mainly done in single-row orchards with a density of 1000–2000 plants/ha, but there are also double-row spacing. The papaya height ranged from 2.15 to 3.0 m, with fc attaining values as high as 0.82 in a mature orchard.
Table 5 presents the values of Kc and Kcb reported in the selected studies for all crops of this item together with factors that mainly influence them: plant density, fc, and h. The observation of results lets perceive and confirm the importance of these and their association with specific cultivation practices such as the training system, and soil management. Few information was provided on row and inter-row ground cover, but most studies were conducted under bare soil (BS) conditions. Pruning practices were not reported in the selected studies, and therefore, their impacts could not be assessed. The training system was only reported on the studies of cape gooseberry and cherimoya, which, together with the plant density, determine the crop height and the fraction of ground cover, that have a great influence on the Kc/Kcb values. The data on fc and h was also limited, thus not allowing to adequately characterize the orchards and plantations.
The Kc ini values are around 0.50–0.60 for most crops, reflecting lower vegetative development (i.e., lower Kcb values) and higher evaporation from the soil due to frequent soil wetting events from precipitation and irrigation. Generally, much higher Kc values were observed during the mid-season, exceeding 1.0 in some cases when, due to the high contribution of soil evaporation during the wet season.
Following the same approach as for Table 3, Table 6 was built relating the Kc and Kcb standard values for the initial, mid- and end-season stages, with the main characteristics of the orchards, i.e., age (young vs. full bearing or mature), plant density and the related fraction of ground cover and plants hight. The degree of ground cover or fc varies from very low in young (non-full bearing) plants (<1–8 years, depending on the crop) to very high. Plant densities and fc values presented in Table 6 should be viewed as indicative of what is commonly found in commercial orchards. The described groups may help users to decide which group is more suitable for the case under study. The information relative to fc and h can be used along with the proposed parameters ML and Fr to compute the Kcb values using the A&P approach (Allen and Pereira 2009; Pereira et al. 2020a).
Table 6 also presents the ranges of Kcb and Kc obtained from field measurements and proposed in the selected studies and the ranges of Kc and Kcb values previously tabulated for cherimoya, guava, mango, and papaya (Allen and Pereira 2009; Rallo et al. 2021). Readers are advised to interpolate the proposed Kcb and Kc using their available data.
Tropical evergreen orchards and plantations: acerola, carambola, cashew, cacao, coffee, jaboticaba, jatropha, macadamia
The main characteristics of the crops in this section originated from the selected studies presented in the following and summarized in Table 7. The observed Kc and Kcb values are presented in Table 8.
Acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC.), or Barbados cherry, is a shrub or small tree (2–3 m). Brazil is the world’s largest producer, and the production area has increased in recent years. However, there is a lack of studies focusing on water use and determining crop coefficients. The two selected studies (Konrad 2002; Santos et al. 2014) were developed in the southeastern region of Brazil (Table 7). Both were performed in young acerola orchards and ETc act was measured using a weighing lysimeter (Santos et al. 2014). In the other study, an estimation test of different Kc values impacts on yields was used (Konrad 2002). The latter orchard was irrigated using micro-sprinklers and the former used drip irrigation. The plant density generally ranges from 416 to 833 plants/ha (Ritzinger and Ritzinger 2011) and the study by Konrad (2002) reported a plant density of 666 plants/ha. None of the selected studies reported on fc or h and only the mid-season Kc values were proposed, 0.88–1.00 (Table 8).
Carambola (Averrhoa carambola L.), also called star fruit, is mainly grown in Southeast Asia and is widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical warm areas. The largest world’s producer is Malaysia. Carambola is sensitive to temperatures below 10 °C, particularly the young trees, and high wind speed. There was only one study available for this crop (Kisekka et al. 2010), which was developed in USA in a mature orchard. ETc act was measured with the SWB. The orchard had a plant density of 494 plants/ha, was irrigated using micro-sprinkler and a full irrigation strategy was adopted. The reported Kc values were high, with Kc ini = 1.00 and Kc mid = 1.15 (Table 8).
Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) is a tropical tree originated in northeast Brazil, but is mainly grown in Côte d’Ivoire and India. Cashew orchards are commonly rainfed, and no grafting and training systems are used, resulting in low productivity (Carneiro et al. 2004). Common cashew cultivars can reach a height of 5–8 m, while new cultivars are early maturity and dwarf plants for easy harvesting (Gondim et al. 2020). New dwarf cashew cultivars are full bearing after two years of planting. The selected studies focused on these early-maturity dwarf cultivars developed in Brazil. One study was developed in a young orchard (Gondim et al. 2020), and the other was carried out along five years in the same orchard (Miranda et al. 2013). In both studies, measurements of ETc act were performed with SWB. Micro-irrigation was used, and the plant density ranged from 180 to 312 plants/ha. The information on fc was provided in a five years study (Miranda et al. 2013), showing fc ranging 0.05–0.65. According to the study by Miranda et al. (2013), the Kc values are quite similar along the year (Table 8), ranging from 0.50 to 0.65, according to the orchard development, i.e., to the fc. The study by Gondim et al. (2020) presented a wide Kc range, from 0.30 to 0.87 (Table 8).
Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) is an evergreen tree native to the Amazon basin but Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana are the largest cacao producing countries. Cacao is commonly grown in shade, although high yields have been observed in full sun monocultures (Baligar et al. 2008). Pruning is not a common practice in most cacao orchards. Three studies were selected from the literature, two of them developed in fully bearing orchards, one in Mexico (López-López et al. 2013) and the other in Brazil (Waldburger et al. 2019), the other in Indonesia, likely mature but without information on age (Kaimuddin et al. 2020). ETc act was measured using the SWB and, in one case, with crop transpiration measurements using sap flow sensors. However, only Waldburger et al. (2019) provided for an adequate set of information. This orchard was drip irrigated and had a plant density of 1250 plants/ha, which is within the commonly used ranges of 1096–3333 plants/ha (Carr and Lockwood 2011). The mean plant height was 3 m. The Kc values ranged from 0.60–1.04, 0.70–1.04 and 0.70–1.04 for the initial, mid-season and end-season stages, respectively (Table 8). The results show that Kc values are relatively similar throughout the season in the same orchard.
Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) and Coffea canephora (var. robusta) are the two main grown varieties. The specie arabica accounts for 70% of global coffee production. Brazil is the main producer. Most of the selected studies were developed in Brazil (Silva et al. 2009; Lena et al. 2011, Vale Sant’Ana et al. 2022) while one was developed in Colombia (Castaño-Marín et al. 2021). The measurement of ETc act was performed using diverse methods, with the main one being the SWB; one used WL and another used EC. The orchards were irrigated with sprinkler and drip irrigation with most schedules aimed at satisfying crop water requirements. The plant densities ranged from 3125 to 7619 plants/ha. Most studies were performed in coffee orchards with <4 years. No information was available relative to fc and only one study reported on plant height of around 2 m. For most cases, the lower Kc values were obtained in the studies developed in the younger orchards (Table 8), which relates to the lower tree development. The Kc values for full bearing orchards (Lena et al. 2011; Vale Sant’Ana et al. 2022) presented a small variation in the values of the Kc ini and Kc end, ranging 0.70–0.83, while Kc mid ranged 0.70–1.06 (Table 8).
Jabuticaba (Plinia peruviana (Poir.) Govaerts) is a subtropical evergreen fruit tree endemic from Brazil, which is the main producer particularly in the southeast (Oliveira et al. 2019). It is considered a cauliflorous tree because its flowers sprout directly from the trunk and branches (Gomes et al. 2007). Under favourable conditions, it can bear fruit all year round. A single study on Kc was available in the literature (Bergamaschi and Prua 2018), which was developed in a rainfed mature orchard with a plant density of 494 plants/ha, with high ground cover (fc = 0.80) and trees reaching a height of 3.5 m. Despite being rainfed, sufficient water was available for the crop to assure no stress. The soil water balance was used for measuring ETc act. The Kc values ranged from 0.90 to 1.06 with the higher value occurring during the mid-season (Table 8).
Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) is a deciduous shrub or tree species that grows on poor or less fertile soils and marginal areas. Jatropha is a non-food plant (due to its toxic watery sap) that is mostly used for biodiesel production and for the pharmaceutical industry (Fagbayide et al. 2019). Indonesia is the world’s top producer. Three studies on the estimation of crop coefficients were selected (Garg et al. 2014; Fagbayide et al. 2019; Lena et al. 2021). Several methods were used for the measurement of ETc act, namely SWB, DL, and WL (Table 7). One of the orchards was surveyed until reaching full bearing (Lena et al. 2021). The orchards presented a very wide range of plant densities, from 833 to 4444 plants/ha. Trees can reach a height of 2.9 m after maturity (Lena et al. 2021). The Kc values for this orchard ranged from 0.30 to 1.10, with the higher value observed during the mid-season stage (Table 8).
Macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia Maiden & Betche) is an increasingly important crop in South Africa, which is the main world producer. Macadamia is a fast-growing, medium-sized evergreen tree with long green leaves native to Australia. All the selected studies were developed in South Africa in seven orchards. After five years of planting, Macadamia trees can bear nuts and reach full production after ten years. Thus, only two orchards were full bearing. The macadamia tree is trained in a single main trunk (central leader modified), but an untrained tree may be a better option (Taylor et al. 2021). The propagation method is by grafting or budding onto rootstocks; all the studied orchards used Beaumont rootstock. The most used plant density ranges between 200 and 360 plants/ha, and in the selected studies it was 312 plants/ha. A set of methods were used for ETc act measurements nanely EC, SWB, sap flow and microlysimeters. The orchards were drip or micro-sprinkler irrigated. The trees height reached 5.7 m in the fully bearing orchards, while the fc ranged between 0.60 and 0.72. The Macadamia trees exhibit a strong stomatal control of transpiration responding to increases in atmospheric demand, resulting in low Fr values and crop coefficients (Kc) (Mashabatu et al. 2023). In other words, macadamia trees can maintain leaf water potential even in high atmospheric demand. The Kc values were only available for one of the studies, for a non-full bearing orchard, with similar Kc ini and Kc end values of 0.55 and a Kc mid of 0.68 (Table 8). Results show that the Kcb values are highly linked with the fc values and tree heights. Therefore, the Kcb ini values ranged from 0.10–0.45, Kcb mid values ranged from 0.26–0.45 while Kcb end values ranged from 0.10–0.35.
The Table 9 shows the standard initial, mid- and end-season Kc and Kcb values for acerola, carambola, cashew, cacao, coffee, jaboticaba, jatropha and macadamia, which are grouped according to the degree of ground cover, plant density and training system as previously reported for Table 3. Table 9 also includes the Kc/Kcb values derived from the selected studies, as well as the previous tabulated standard Kc and Kcb values, only available for cacao and coffee (Allen et al. 1998, Jensen and Allen 2016; Rallo et al. 2021), which were the bases for the proposed standard values. However, due to the lack of observed or previously tabulated Kc and Kcb values for the other crops, most of the proposed standard Kc and Kcb values were calculated using the A&P method (Pereira et al. 2020a, b). Due to scarce information in the selected papers, the values of plant densities and degree of ground cover included in Table 9 result from values commonly found for commercial orchards, and therefore should be viewed as indicative.
As mentioned previously, the suggested standard Kcb values increase when fc increases due to the close relationship between Kcb and fc. Since Kc also varies due to the soil evaporation component (Ke), which is determined primarily by the frequency and depth of rainfall or irrigation events, as well as the energy available for soil water evaporation, this fraction is determined by the radiation intercepted by the canopy. i.e. through the fc values as for the dual Kc proposed in FAO56 (Allen et al. 1998).
Palm, fiber and rubber plantations
The main characteristics of the plantations referred to in this section are presented below and summarized in Table 10, while the observed Kc/Kcb values are presented in Table 11. Main plantations herein considered are palm plantations. Palms are perennial monocotyledonous plants characterized by a woody stem. Palm trees thrive in humid and hot climates but are found in various habitats.
Açai Palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) is a palm tree typically found in the floodplains of the Amazon biome in Northern Brazil (Sousa et al. 2021). Its fruit is a worldwide increasingly popular superfood in the twenty-first century. Açai fruits and hearts of palm are eaten as vegetables. Few studies are available and only one, carried out in Brazil (Sousa et al. 2021), was selected. Supplemental irrigation is important during the fruiting phase, from March to October, which corresponds to the mid-season stage (Sousa et al. 2021). The study was conducted in a mature orchard, with an average plant height of 10 m and a plant density of 417 plants/ha, irrigated with micro-sprinklers (Table 10). The ETc act was measured using a BREB equipment, while soil evaporation was measured using micro-lysimeters, which permitted to compute Ke and Kcb. The Kc and Kcb values vary little along the season, thus with initial and end-season values close to the mid-season ones, which are high (Table 11).
Coconut (Cocus nucifera L.) is an evergreen single-stemmed palm that mainly grows in the tropics and subtropics between 20° North and South latitudes (Miranda et al. 2007). Top producers include Indonesia, the Philippines, India and Brazil. Nowadays, dwarf or semi-dwarf coconut palms, with a height lowered to 7 m, are preferred because they can produce much early than traditional cultivars (Teixeira et al. 2019). Research studies on crop water requirements and Kc are, however, scarce. The two selected studies were performed in dwarf coconut orchards, located in the northeast of Brazil, irrigated with micro-sprinklers and having a plant density of 115 to 178 plants/ha (Table 10). A SWB approach (Miranda et al. 2007) and a remote sensing VI method (Teixeira et al. 2019) were used to estimate ETc act. The fc ranged from 0.30 to 0.85 in accordance with the age of the orchard (Table 10). The Kc values in Table 11 showed a tight relation with fc values. Kc mid values ranged from 0.75 to 1.02.
Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is a palm tree grown in many tropical regions worldwide for its sweet edible fruits. The date palm may have originated in Mesopotamia. The fruit has been the staple food and a major source of wealth in the oasis of North Africa and the Middle East. The main worlds’ producer is Egypt, followed by Saudi Arabia. Eleven studies were selected, most of them performed in Saudi Arabia (Kassem 2007; Alamoud et al. 2012; Ismail et al. 2014; Al-Qurashi et al. 2016; Alharbi et al. 2016), and one in Egypt (Sadik et al. 2018), Emirates (Al-Muaini et al. 2019), Israel (Sperling et al. 2014), Jordan (Mazahrih et al. 2012), Kuwait (Bhat et al. 2012), and USA (Montazar et al. 2020). Most studies used the SWB method for estimating ETc act, while two others used lysimeters (WL or DL), one used EC and SR (Table 10) and another used SF measurements for estimating crop transpiration (Al-Muaini et al. 2019). All plantations used localized irrigation (drip, bubbler, or microjet), but one combined localized and surface irrigation (Montazar et al. 2020). The plant density ranged from 100 to 204 plants/ha is commonly used, and the mean tree height of the full bearing plantations ranged from 2.2 m (Mazahrih et al. 2012) to 11.5 m (Montazar et al. 2020). Information on fc from a few studies ranged between 0.20 and 0.81. The Kc values (Table 11) show a wide range of variation in both young and mature plantations due to differences in cultivars and management, generally showing Kc ini and Kc end not far from Kc mid as common with evergreen trees.
Guayule (Parthenium argentatum A. Gray) is a perennial shrub, with ratoon-cropping potential for multiples harvests, usually every 2-years and is being commercially exploited for up to 10 years. It is native to the deserts of the southern United States and northern Mexico, known as a source of natural rubber (Table 10). It is drought tolerant and grows better at air temperatures above 18 °C. A single study was selected focusing on guayule water requirements (Elshikha et al. 2021), conducted in Arizona in two young plantations having plant densities of 44,000 and 78,000 plants/ha (Table 10). Plants height ranged from 0.95 to 1.05 m, and a full ground cover was reached (fc = 1) in both plantations. The plantations were irrigated with sub-surface drip and furrow irrigation. SWB was used for the estimation of ETc act. Table 11 presents the Kc and Kcb values adjusted to standard climate conditions provided by Elshikha et al. (2021) for both plantations, which show Kc mid values, of around 1.20, about doubling Kc ini and Kc end (Table 11). Because guayule is typically harvested commercially every two years the reported standard Kc/Kcb values refer to two groups (Table 12). The first group refers to both the young plantations and the seasons after each harvest (third, fifth, seventh, ninth year after sowing/planting), i.e. the time when the crop is not yet fully developed. The other group refers to the years when the plant is fully developed and harvested. In this case, the plant reaches its potential and therefore the Kc/Kcb levels are higher since the beginning of the season.
Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) is a perennial crop native to West Africa, grown in tropical environments, and is a very important source of vegetable oil. Indonesia, followed by Malaysia, is the largest palm oil-producing country. Few studies are available in the literature relative to the water use of oil palm. The selected articles originate in Brazil (Santos 2019), India (Kallarackal et al. 2004), and Malaysia (Henson et al. 2005, 2007). Most studies were developed in mature plantations, with a density of 143–148 plants/ha, and were irrigated.
ETc act was measured with WL or the combination of EC and SWB. In one case, crop transpiration was determined with the PM combination equation, thus allowing to derive Kcb values (Kallarackal et al. 2004). Few information was available relative to plants height, which was 2.2–2.3 m for a non-mature orchard (Santos 2019). The Kcb values for young plantations vary in a wide range related with the increase in fc (Santos 2019). The Kcb mid values for the mature orchards ranged from 0.85 to 1.15.
Peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth), also called “pupunha,” is native to the tropical forests of Central and South America. The cultivation serves a dual purpose, the fruits and the edible heart-of-palm or “palmito”. The world’s top producers are Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Despite studies reporting data on water use are scarce, three studies were selected, all conducted in Brazil (Ramos 1998; Bassoi et al. 2003; Lopes et al. 2004). In two of them, the plantations were surveyed from planting to maturity (Bassoi et al. 2003; Lopes et al. 2004), while the other was conducted on a mature plantation (Ramos 1998). The plant density, used in commercial areas and in the selected studies, is 5000 plants/ha, while h ranged between 1.5 and 2 m. The information on fc was only available in one study, with fc = 0.30 (Lopes et al. 2004). All studies used SWB to measure ETc act, but two of them also used lysimeters (Ramos 1998; Lopes et al. 2004). The plantations were irrigated with localized or sprinkler irrigation. Table 11 includes the Kc values showing that Kc ini and Kc end are close or equal to Kc mid in mature plantations, with Kc mid ≥ 1.0.
Ramie (Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich) is a perennial herbaceous plant that produces fibre. The largest producer is China, followed by Brazil, the Philippines, and India. Only one study on water use and crop coefficients was available in literature (Mitra et al. 2018) but information provided is very restrict. The study was developed along three years on a furrow irrigated plantation located in India. ETc act was measured using the SWB method. Table 11 shows only the average Kc mid = 0.82.
Rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis L.), or Pará rubber, is a tropical tree that naturally produces rubber. It is native to the tropical areas of South America, especially Brazil, but is also spread in Southeast Asia, and West Africa. The top producers are Thailand and Indonesia. Two studies were selected from the scarce literature on water use, one conducted in India (Vijayakumar et al. 1998) and the other in China (Ling et al. 2023). The planting density ranged from 250 to 400 plants/ha. Few information was available on plant height, with average h = 11.5 m (Ling et al. 2023), and fc < 0.90. The Kc values (Table 11) show Kc mid > 1.10 and values for the initial and end-season stages not far from that value since it is an evergreen plantation cultivated in a rainy area.
Table 12 includes the Kc/Kcb values derived from the selected studies as well as the previously tabulated standard Kc and Kcb values available for palms and rubber trees (Allen et al. 1998; Allen and Pereira 2009; Jensen and Allen 2016; Rallo et al. 2021). These publications were the bases for the proposed standard Kc and Kcb values for the FAO segmented curve listed in the last two columns of the table. These standard values were derived from the previously mentioned information and using the A&P approach due to the lack of available Kc/Kcb information for many of the established groups of each crop. As for the other crops studied in the current review, Kc/Kcb values increase with increasing fc as they are directly related to the transpiration component of ETc, while the soil evaporation component is mainly determined by the frequency and depth of irrigation events and rainfall, and the energy available for soil water evaporation, which is limited by fc. As noted, the plant densities and degree of ground cover values presented in Table 12 are those commonly found in commercial orchards.
Conclusions and recommendations
This review highlighted the limited number of scientific articles published after FAO56 that reported crop coefficients for many tropical and subtropical orchards and plantations. The selected studies enabled an adequate collection of well-conducted field experiments and data processing focused on the crop water requirements of these orchards and plantations. However, there is a lack of research studies on many tropical trees and shrubs, thus there is the need to improve knowledge of water management practices and efficient water use and savings without negatively impacting on the quantity and quality of yields.
Most studies used irrigation aiming at fully meeting crop water requirements, and few used regulated or sustained deficit irrigation strategies. Therefore, to improve water use and saving water, particularly in the context of climate variability and climate change, the application of deficit irrigation practices requires further knowledge and appropriate training of technicians and farm advisors to support farmers in daily decision-making. This article does not cover deficit irrigation issues but supports related further studies through providing for the know-how relative to compute crop evapotranspiration that is required for SWB studies usable for defining appropriate irrigation schedules.
The data retrieved from the selected studies combined with previously standard crop coefficients formed the basis for the proposed and tabulated standard Kc/Kcb values. Furthermore, the estimation of standard crop coefficients was also done using the A&P approach (Allen and Pereira 2009; Pereira et al. 2021c). This approach is based on a few field observations, fc and h, and can provide valuable information for irrigation management and scheduling for the specific conditions of orchards and plantations. The successful application of the A&P approach to support irrigation scheduling has been described for several orchards and plantations in California using the Satellite Irrigation Management Support (SIMS) framework (Melton et al. 2018). Irrigation planning and consumptive use assessment studies at the project or watershed level may also be based on the use of standard Kc and Kcb or the A&P approach.
The proposed standard values for Kc and Kcb should be used as upper limits. It is not expected that, with few exceptions, predicting ETc would require Kc/Kcb larger than the standard values. Moreover, when pursuing water savings strategies, definitely required to face water scarcity, sustained deficit irrigation should be considered, targeted, through adopting a reduction factor to the standard values for Kc and Kcb. It results a water saving irrigation scheduling appropriate to the orchards and plantations actual water availability conditions.
Quality control of the measured actual Kc and Kcb values is required. It may be performed by comparing the newly measured Kc/Kcb with the standard Kc/Kcb values tabulated in this article. If used correctly, the information will support sustainable water use, improve crop productivity and achieve progressive adaptation measures to cope with climate change. It is recommended that users study and analyze the publications herein quoted in addition to analysing the tabulated material in the current review article, namely relative to the techniques used in the cited research and to the dates and duration of the crop growth stages. There is a need to increase awareness of water conservation practices and irrigation scheduling during water scarcity and droughts, particularly based on understanding the applicability of standard crop coefficients and their transferability to other locations/climatic conditions.
Future studies should focus on high-accuracy ETc determination of less studied crops, namely using some well-developed water and energy balance approaches. Further studies are also needed on the long-term effects of regulated deficit irrigation on crop production, as well as the use of practices to reduce non-beneficial water use, e.g., controlling soil evaporation. Fruit load and thining are expected to influence the actual Kc/Kcb values used for irrigation purposes, but there is not yet sufficient information on the extent of this influence, so studies on this topic are welcome.
Abbreviations
- A&P:
-
Allen and Pereira (2009) approach
- AGC:
-
Active ground cover
- Avg.:
-
Average
- BREB:
-
Bowen ratio energy balance
- BS:
-
Bare soil
- Capac:
-
Capacitance sensors
- DI:
-
Deficit Irrigation
- DL:
-
Drainage lysimeters
- DPS:
-
Density of plants and spacing
- EC:
-
Eddy covariance
- FAO-PM-ETo :
-
Grass reference ETo computed with full data
- FDR:
-
Frequency Domain Reflectometry
- FI:
-
Full irrigation
- grav.:
-
Gravimetric method
- LAI:
-
Leaf area index
- Lys.:
-
Lysimeter
- Med:
-
Mediterranean
- Mic-spr:
-
Micro-sprinkler or micro-sprayer
- ML:
-
Mini or micro lysimeters
- n/r:
-
Not reported
- NDVI:
-
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
- OPEC:
-
Open-Path Eddy-Covariance
- Pl mulch:
-
Plastic mulch
- PM-eq.:
-
Penman–Monteith combination equation
- RDI:
-
Regulated Deficit Irrigation
- RS:
-
Remote sensing
- SDI:
-
Sustained Deficit Irrigation
- SEB:
-
Surface energy balance
- SF:
-
Sap flow
- Spr.:
-
Sprinkler
- SR:
-
Surface renewal
- SWB:
-
Soil water balance
- TDR:
-
Time domain reflectrometer
- Ten.:
-
Tensiometers
- VI:
-
Vegetation index
- WL:
-
Weighing lysimeter
- ETc :
-
Crop evapotranspiration under standard conditions [mm d−1 or mm h−1]
- ETc act :
-
Actual crop evapotranspiration, i.e., under non-standard conditions [mm d−1 or mm h−1]
- ETo :
-
(Grass) reference crop evapotranspiration [mm d−1 or mm h−1]
- fc :
-
Fraction of soil surface covered by vegetation [–]
- fIPAR :
-
Fraction of the intercepted PAR [–]
- Fr :
-
Adjustment factor relative to stomatal control [–]
- G:
-
Soil heat flux density [MJ m−2 d−1]
- h:
-
Crop height [m]
- H:
-
Sensible heat flux [MJ m−2 d−1]
- Kc :
-
(Standard) crop coefficient [–]
- Kc act :
-
Actual crop coefficient (non-standard conditions) [–]
- Kc avg :
-
(Standard) average crop coefficient [–]
- Kc ini :
-
Crop coefficient during the initial growth stage [–]
- Kc mid :
-
Crop coefficient during the mid-season stage [–]
- Kc end :
-
Crop coefficient at end of the late season stage [–]
- Kcb :
-
Standard basal crop coefficient [–]
- Kcb act :
-
Actual basal crop coefficient (non-standard conditions) [–]
- Kcb ini :
-
Basal crop coefficient during the initial stage [–]
- Kcb mid :
-
Basal crop coefficient during the mid-season stage [–]
- Kcb end :
-
Basal crop coefficient at end of the late season stage [–]
- Ks :
-
Water stress coefficient [–]
- ML :
-
Multiplier relative to the canopy transparency [–]
- ra :
-
Aerodynamic resistance [s m−1]
- rs :
-
Bulk crop-soil surface resistance [s m−1]
- Rn :
-
Net radiation at the crop surface [MJ m−2 d−1]
- Tc :
-
Crop transpiration [mm d−1 or mm h−1]
- λET:
-
Latent heat flux [MJ m−2 d−1]
References
Alamoud AI, Mohammad FS, Al-Hamed SA, Alabdulkaber AM (2012) Reference evapotranspiration and date palm water use in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int Res J Agric Sci Soil Sci 2:155–169
Alharbi A, Alzoheiry A, Ghazaw YM (2016) Estimation of water requirements and crop coefficients for date palm in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. J Agric Vet Sci 9:187–196
Allen RG, Pereira LS (2009) Estimating crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Irrig Sci 28:17–34
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Howell TA, Jensen ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agric Water Manag 98:899–920
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Paper 56, FAO, Rome, 300 pp
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Smith M, Raes D, Wright JL (2005) FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method for estimating evaporation from soil and application extensions. J Irrig Drain Eng 131(1):2–13
Allen RG, Pruitt WO, Wright JL, Howell TA, Ventura F, Snyder R, Itenfisu D, Steduto P, Berengena J, Baselga Yrisarry J, Smith M, Pereira LS, Raes D, Perrier A, Alves I, Walter I, Elliott R (2006) A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method. Agric Water Manage 81:1–22
Al-Muaini A, Green S, Dakheel A, Abdullah A, Dahr WAA, Dixon S, Kemp P, Clothier B (2019) Irrigation management with saline groundwater of a date palm cultivar in the hyper-arid United Arab Emirates. Agric Water Manag 211:123–131
Al-Qurashi AD, Ismail SM, Awad MA (2016) Effect of water regimes and palm coefficient on growth parameters, date yield and irrigation water use of tissue culture regenerated ‘Barhee’ date palms grown in a newly established orchard. Irrig Drain 65:491–501
Andrade IPS, Carvalho DF, Almeida WS, Gonçalves Silva JB, Silva LDB (2014) Water requirement and yield of fig trees under different drip irrigation management. Eng Agric 34:17–27
Ayars JE, Phene CJ, Phene R, Gao S, Wang D, Day KR, Makus DK (2017) Determining pomegranate water and nitrogen requirements with drip irrigation. Agric Water Manag 187:11–23
Baligar VC, Bunce JA, Machado RCR, Elson MK (2008) Photosynthetic photon flux density, carbon dioxide concentration, and vapor pressure deficit effects on photosynthesis in cacao seedlings. Photosynthetica 46:216–221
Bassoi LH, Flori JE, Silva EEG, Silva JAM (2003) Guidelines for irrigation scheduling of peach palm for heart-of-palm production in the São Francisco Valley, Brazil. Hort Brasil 21:681–685
Batista AC (2022) Coeficiente de cultivo da pitaia (Hylocereus sp.). Thesis of degree. Univ Fed Rio Grande Norte, Macaíba, RN, Brazil
Bergamaschi H, Prua CK (2018) Parameters of water consumption associated with the microclimate of an orchard of jaboticaba trees in southern Brazil. Agrometeoros Passo Fundo 26:161–171
Bhantana N, Lazarovitch N (2010) Evapotranspiration, crop coefficient and growth of two young pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) varieties under salt stress. Agric Water Manage 97:715–722
Bhat NR, Lekha VS, Suleiman MK, Thomas B, Ali SI, George P, Al-Mulla L (2012) Estimation of water requirements for young date palms under arid climatic conditions of Kuwait. World J Agric Sci 8:448–452
Carr MKV, Lockwood G (2011) The water relations and irrigation requirements of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.): a review. Expl Agric 47:653–676
Carneiro PT, Fernandes PD, Soares FAL, Viana SBA (2004) Salt tolerance of precocious-dwarf cashew rootstocks—physiological and growth indexes. Sci Agric 61(1):9–16
Castaño-Marín AM, Riaño-Herrera NM, Góez-Vinasco GA, García-López JC, Figueroa-Casas A (2021) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients for coffee production systems in Colombia using the eddy covariance method. Agron J 114:678–688
Chaterlán Y, Hernández G, López T, Martínez R, Puig O, Paredes P, Pereira LS (2012a) Estimation of the papaya crop coefficients for improving irrigation water management in South of Havana. Acta Hortic 928:179–186
Chaterlán Y, Rosa R, Hernández G, López T, Pereira LS (2012b) Estimación de las necesidades hídricas de la papaya utilizando la aproximación de los coeficientes culturales duales. Rev Cienc Técn Agropec, Cuba 21:12–17
Coelho EF, Simões WL, Lima DM (2010) Crescimento e produtividade do mamoeiro cultivar sunrise solo sob irrigação nos tabuleiros costeiros da Bahia. Magistra, Cruz das Almas, Brazil, vol 22, pp 96–102
Consoli S, Inglese G, Inglese P (2013) Determination of evapotranspiration and annual biomass productivity of a cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica L. (Mill.)] orchard in a semiarid environment. J Irrig Drain Eng 139:680–690
Durán-Zuazo VH, Franco D, García-Tejero IF, Gutiérrez S, Cermeño P, Pertiñez JJ (2019a) Water use and leaf nutrient status for terraced cherimoya trees in a subtropical Mediterranean environment. Horticulturae 5:46. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5020046
Durán-Zuazo VH, Rodríguez-Pleguezuelo CR, Gálvez-Ruiz B, Gutiérrez-Gordillo S, García-Tejero IF (2019b) Water use and fruit yield of mango (Mangifera indica L.) grown in a subtropical Mediterranean climate. Int J Fruit Sci 19:136–150
Elbana M, El-Gamal EH, Mohamed A, Fernando AL, Pari L, Outzourhit A, Elwakeel M, El-Sheikh WE, Rashad M (2020) Effect of irrigation scheduling on canopy cover development and crop-water management related parameters of Opuntia ficus-indica under prolonged drought conditions. Sci J Agric Sci 2(2):113–122
Elshikha DEM, Waller PM, Hunsaker DJ, Dierig D, Wang G, Von Mark VC, Thorp KR, Katterman ME, Bronson KF, Wall GW (2021) Growth, water use, and crop coefficients of direct-seeded guayule with furrow and subsurface drip irrigation in Arizona. Ind Crop Prod 170:113819
Evett SR, Schwartz RC, Casanova JJ, Heng LK (2012a) Soil water sensing for water balance, ET and WUE. Agr Water Manag 104:1–9
Evett SR, Kustas WP, Gowda PH, Anderson MC, Prueger JH, Howell TA (2012b) Overview of the Bushland evapotranspiration and agricultural remote sensing experiment 2008 (BEAREX08): a field experiment evaluating methods for quantifying ET at multiple scales. Adv Water Resour 50:4–19
Fagbayide SD, Ewemoje TA, Oluwasemire KO (2019) Experimental determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficient of Jatropha curcas in sub-humid region of Nigeria. ASABE Annual Int Meeting 1900465. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201900465
Freire JLO, Cavalcante LF, Rebequi AM, Dias TJ, Luna Souto AG (2011) Necessidade hídrica do maracujazeiro amarelo cultivado sob estresse salino, biofertilização e cobertura do solo. Rev Caatinga 24(1):82–91
Freitas EM, Silva GH, Guimarães GFC, Vital TNB, Vieira JH, Silveira FA, Gomes CN, Cunha FF (2023) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of Physalis peruviana cultivated with recycled paper as mulch. Sci Hortic 320:112212
Garg KK, Wani SP, Kesava Rao AVR (2014) Crop coefficients of jatropha (Jatropha curcas) and pongamia (Pongamia pinnata) using water balance approach. Wires Energy Environ 3:301–309
Gomes GC, Rodrigues WF, Gomes FRC, Barbieri RL, Garrastazu MC (2007) Conservação de frutíferas nativas: localização, fenologia e reprodução. Documentos. ed. Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas
Gondim R, Serrano L, da Silva J P, Araújo T (2020) Necessidade hídrica na implantação de pomar do clone BRS 226 de cajueiro-anão. Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br
Henson IE, Noor MRM, Harun MH, Yahya Z, Mustakim SNA (2005) Stress development and its detection in young oil palms in north Kedah, Malaysia. J Oil Palm Res 17:11–26
Henson IE, Yahya Z, Noor MRM, Harun MH, Mohammed AT (2007) Predicting soil water status, evapotranspiration, growth and yield of young Oil Palm in a seasonally dry region of Malaysia. J Oil Palm Res 19:389–415
Hernández-Cuello G, Seijas TL, Petitón JP, Varona RM, Estrada OP (2015) Cuantificación de área humedecida y balance hídrico en guayaba con riego por goteo. Rev Cienc Técn Agropec 24(5):12–18
Hu Y, Li Y, Zhang Y (2012) A study on crop coefficients of jujube under drip-irrigation in Loess Plateau of China. Afr J Agric Res 7:2971–2977
Ibraimo NA, Taylor NJ, Ghezehei S, Gush MB, Annandale JG (2014) Water use of macadamia orchards. In: Gush MB, Taylor NJ (eds) The water use of selected fruit tree orchards (volume 2): technical report on measurements and modelling. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, RSA, WRC Report 1770/2/14, Section 6, pp 175–212
Intrigliolo DS, Bartual J, García-González JF, Guerra D, Parra J, Bonet L (2019) Quantifying pomegranate tree responses to water and nutrients for a sustainable fertirrigation. Acta Hortic 1254:193–198
Intrigliolo DS, Wang D, Pérez-Gago M B, Palou L, Ayars J, Puerto H, Bartual J (2021) Water requirements and responses to irrigation restrictions. In: Sarkhosh A, Yavari AM, Zamani Z (eds) The pomegranate: botany, production and uses. CABI Digital Library, pp 320–343
Ismail SM, Al-Qurashi AD, Awad MA (2014) Optimization of irrigation water use, yield, and quality of ‘Nabbut-Saif’ date palm under dry land conditions. Irrig Drain 63:29–37
Jat R, Singh VP, Ali Abed S, Al-Ansari N, Singh PK, Vishwakarma DK, Choudhary A, Al-Sadoon MK, Popat RC, Jat SK (2022) Deficit irrigation scheduling with mulching and yield prediction of guava (Psidium guajava L.) in a subtropical humid region. Front Environ Sci 10:1044886
Jensen ME, Allen RG (eds) (2016) Evaporation, evapotranspiration, and irrigation water requirements (2nd ed), ASCE Manual 70, ASCE, Reston, VI, 744 p
Kaimuddin KM, Khairunnisa A, Zul F, Bahrun AH, Ridwan I, Widiayani N (2020) Water requirement for cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) plant and the effect of climate factors on the distribution of the cocoa pod borer attacks (Conopomorpha cramerella Snellen) in North Luwu Regency using Cropwat 8.0. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 575:012116
Kallarackal J, Jeyakumar P, George SJ (2004) Water use of irrigated oil palm at three different arid locations in peninsular India. J Oil Palm Res 16:59–67
Karimi P, Bastiaanssen WGM (2015) Spatial evapotranspiration, rainfall and land use data in water accounting—part 1: review of the accuracy of the remote sensing data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:507–532
Kassem MA (2007) Water requirements and crop coefficient of date palm trees “Sukariah cv.” Misr J Agric Eng 24:339–359
Kisekka I, Migliaccio KW, Dukes MD, Schaffer B, Crane JH (2010) Evapotranspiration-based irrigation scheduling and physiological response in a carambola (Averrhoa carambola) orchard. Appl Eng Agric 26(3):373–380
Kishore K (2016) Phenological growth stages of dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) according to the extended BBCH-scale. Sci Hortic 213:294–302
Konrad M (2002) Efeito de sistemas de irrigação localizada sobre a produção e qualidade da acerola (Malpighia spp.) na região da Nova Alta Paulista. MSc Dissertation, UNESP, Ilha Solteira, São Paulo, Brazil
Lena BP, Flumignan DL, Faria RT (2011) Evapotranspiração e coeficiente de cultivo de cafeeiros adultos. Pesq Agropec Bras 46:905–911
Lena BP, Folegatti MV, Flumignan DL, Irmak S, Francisco JP, Diotto AV, Santos ONA, Andrade IPS, Fanaya Junior ED, Marques PAA, Barboza Júnior CRA (2021) Water requirement and crop coefficients of young Jatropha curcas L. trees in a subtropical humid environment. J Irrig Drain Eng 147:04021020
Ling Z, Shi Z, Xia T, Gu S, Liang J, Xu CY (2023) Short-term evapotranspiration forecasting of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Agronomy 13(4):1013
Lopes AS, Hernandez FBT, Alves Júnior J, Valério Filho WV (2004) Manejo da irrigação na cultura da pupunha no Noroeste Paulista. Eng Rural 15:7–14
López-López R, Bustamante WO, López-Andrade AP, Catalán-Valencia E (2013) Método de pulso de calor y flujo de savia para medirla transpiración en el cultivo de cacao. Rev Chapingo Serie Zonas Áridas 12(2):85–96
López-Urrea R, Montoro A, Mañas F, López-Fuster P, Fereres E (2012) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficients from lysimeter measurements of mature Tempranillo wine grapes. Agric Water Manag 112:13–20
López-Urrea R, Oliveira CM, Montoya F, Paredes P, Pereira LS (2024) Single and basal crop coefficients for temperate climate fruit trees, vines and shrubs: a review for updating FAO56 approach. Irrig Sci (in publication)
Macedo JPS, Cavalcante LF, Lobo JT, Pereira MB, Lima Marcelino ADA, Bezerra FTC, Bezerra MAF (2019) Yield and physical quality of the yellow passion fruit under spacing within plants and water salinity. J Exp Agric Int 33(5):1–11
Mali SS, Das B, Bhatnagar PR (2015) Effect of water application method and deficit irrigation on yield, quality and irrigation water use efficiency of litchee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv Shahi. Int J Irrig Water Manag 2:1–7
Marsal J, Casadesus J, Lopez G, Girona J, Stöckle CO (2014) Disagreement between tree size and crop coefficient in ‘Conference’ pear: comparing measurements by a weighing lysimeter and prediction by CropSyst. Acta Hort 1038:303–310
Martínez-Macias KJ, Márquez-Guerrero SY, Martínez-Sifuentes AR, Segura-Castruita MA (2022) Habitat suitability of fig (Ficus carica L.) in Mexico under current and future climates. Agriculture 12(11):1816
Mashabatu M, Ntshidi Z, Dzikiti S, Jovanovic N, Dube T, Taylor NJ (2023) Deriving crop coefficients for evergreen and deciduous fruit orchards in South Africa using the fraction of vegetation cover and tree height data. Agric Water Manage 286:108389
Mattar MA (2007) Irrigation systems effect on growth and productivity in mango orchard. Misr J Agric Eng 24:103–121
Mazahrih NT, Al-Zu’bi Y, Ghnaim H, Lababdeh L, Ghananeem M, Abu-Ahmadeh H (2012) Determination of actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of date palm trees (Phoenix dactylifera) in the Jordan Valley. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 12:434–443
Melton FS, Johnson LF, Guzman A, Dexter J, Zaragosa I, Wang T, Patron E, Duque J, Rosevelt C, Cahn M, Smith R, Temesgen B, Trezza R, Eching S, Frame K (2018) The satellite irrigation management support (SIMS) system: applications of satellite data to support improvements in irrigation management in California. In: California plant and soil conference. American Society of Agronomy, pp 49–51
Meshram DT, Gorantiwar SD, Mittal HK, Singh NV, Lohkare AS (2012) Water requirement of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) plants up to five year age. J Appl Hortic 14(1): 47–50.
Minacapilli M, Agnese C, Blanda F, Cammalleri C, Ciraolo G, D’Urso G, Iovino M, Pumo D, Provenzano G, Rallo G (2009) Estimation of actual evapotranspiration of Mediterranean perennial crops by means of remote-sensing based surface energy balance models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:1061–1074
Miranda FR, Gondim RS, Oliveira VH (2013) Irrigação em cajueiro-anão-precoce. Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br
Miranda F, Gomes AR, Oliveira CH, Montenegro AA, Bezerra FM (2007) Evapotranspiração e coeficientes de cultivo do coqueiro anão-verde na região litorânea do Ceará. Rev Ciênc Agron 38:129–135
Mitra S, Kumar M, Saha M, Barman D, Sarkar S, Mazumdar SP (2018) Effect of irrigation frequency and planting method on growth, fibre-yield and water use by ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) in Indo-Gangetic plains of West Bengal. J Crop Weed 14(2):89–96
Mohammad FS, Alamoud AI, Mahmoud SH (2015) Water requirements and water use of mango orchards in Jazan region, Saudi Arabia. J Animal Plant Sci 25:1008–1015
Montazar A, Krueger R, Corwin D, Pourreza A, Little C, Rios S, Snyder RL (2020) Determination of actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of California date palms using the residual of energy balance approach. Water 12:2253
Montenegro AAT, Bezerra FML, Lima RN (2004) Evapotranspiração e coeficientes de cultura do mamoeiro para a região Litorânea do Ceará. Eng Agríc Jaboticabal 24:464–472
Niu H, Wang D, Chen Y (2020) Estimating actual crop evapotranspiration using deep stochastic configuration networks model and UAV-based crop coefficients in a pomegranate orchard. Proceedings of SPIE 11414, autonomous air and ground sensing systems for agricultural optimization and phenotyping V. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2558221
Niu H, Zhao T, Wei, J, Wang D, Chen Y (2021) Reliable tree-level evapotranspiration estimation of pomegranate trees using lysimeter and UAV multispectral imagery. In: IEEE conference on technologies for sustainability (SusTech). https://doi.org/10.1109/SusTech51236.2021.9467413
Nogueira E, Gomes ER, Sousa VF, Silva LRA, Broetto F (2014) Coeficiente de cultivo e lâminas de irrigação do maracujazeiro amarelo nas condições semiáridas. In: II Inovagri int meeting https://doi.org/10.12702/ii.inovagri.2014-a064
Noory H, Abbasnejad M, Ebrahimian H, Hb A (2021) Determining evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of young and mature pomegranate trees under drip irrigation. Irrig Drain 70:1073–1084
Oliveira GP, Angelotti-Mendonça J, Tanaka FAO, Silva SR, Scarpare Filho JA (2019) Origin and development of reproductive buds in jabuticaba cv. Sabará (Plinia jaboticaba Vell). Sci Hortic 249:432–438
Paço TA, Paredes P, Pereira LS, Silvestre J, Santos FL (2019) Crop coefficients and transpiration of a super intensive Arbequina olive orchard using the dual Kc approach and the Kcb computation with the fraction of ground cover and height. Water 11:383
Patel N, Rajput TBS (2020) Estimation of crop water requirement and design of drip irrigation system for guava based on the hydraulics of water movement. J Pharmacog Phytochem 9(1):1581–1588
Pereira AR, Camargo MBP, Vila-Nova NA (2011) Coffee crop coefficient for precision irrigation based on leaf area index. Agrometeorol Bragantia 70(4):946–951
Pereira LS (2017) Water, agriculture and food: challenges and issues. Water Resour Manag 31:2985–2999
Pereira LS, Allen RG, Smith M, Raes D (2015) Crop evapotranspiration estimation with FAO56: past and future. Agric Water Manag 147:4–20
Pereira LS, Cordery I, Iacovides I (2009) Coping with water scarcity. Addressing the challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Pereira LS, Paredes P, Hunsaker DJ, López-Urrea R, Mohammadi Shad Z (2021a) Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method. Agric Water Manag 243:106466
Pereira LS, Paredes P, Jovanovic N (2020a) Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach. Agr Water Manag 241:106357
Pereira LS, Paredes P, López-Urrea R, Hunsaker DJ, Mota M, Mohammadi Shad Z (2021b) Standard single and basal crop coefficients for vegetable crops, an update of FAO56 crop water requirements approach. Agric Water Manage 241:106196
Pereira LS, Paredes P, Melton F, Johnson L, Mota M, Wang T (2021c) Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height: practical application to vegetable, field and fruit crops with focus on parameterization. Agric Water Manag 252:106663
Pereira LS, Paredes P, Melton F, Johnson L, Wang T, López-Urrea R, Cancela JJ, Allen R (2020b) Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Background and validation using ground and remote sensing data. Agric Water Manag 241:106197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106197
Pereira LS, Paredes P, Oliveira CM, Montoya F, López-Urrea R, Salman M (2023) Single and basal crop coefficients for estimation of water use of tree and vine woody crops with consideration of fraction of ground cover, height, and training system for Mediterranean and warm temperate fruit and leaf crops. Irri Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00901-7
Pereira LS, Perrier A, Allen RG, Alves I (1999) Evapotranspiration: review of concepts and future trends. J Irrig Drain Eng 125:45–51
Pôças I, Calera A, Campos I, Cunha M (2020) Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficients: a review on spectral vegetation indices approaches. Agr Water Manag 233:106081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106081
Pôças I, Paço TA, Cunha M, Andrade JA, Silvestre J, Sousa A, Santos FL, Pereira LS, Allen RG (2014) Satellite based evapotranspiration of a superintensive olive orchard: application of METRIC algorithm. Biosyst Eng 128:69–81
Rallo G, Paço TA, Paredes P, Puig-Sirera A, Massai R, Provenzano G, Pereira LS (2021) Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops. Agr Water Manag 250:106645
Ramos A (1998) Desenvolvimento vegetativo da pupunheira (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) irrigada por gotejamento em função de diferentes níveis de depleção de água no solo MSc thesis, ESALQ, Piracicaba, Brazil
Ramos TB, Darouich H, Oliveira AR, Farzamian M, Monteiro T, Castanheira N, Paz A, Gonçalves MC, Pereira LS (2023) Water use and soil water balance of Mediterranean tree crops assessed with the SIMDualKc model in orchards of southern Portugal. Agric Water Manage 279(3):108209
Ritzinger R, Ritzinger CHSP (2011) Acerola. In: Rodrigues MGV, Dias MSC (eds) Cultivo tropical de fruteiras, vol. 32. Informe Agropecuário, pp 17–25
Rivera GM, Delgado RG, Macías RH, Muñoz VJA (2016) Determinación de las necesidades hídricas del cultivo de higuera en riego por goteo y alta población. Agrofaz Univ Juarez Est Durango 16:105–111
Rodríguez-Pleguezuelo CR, Durán-Zuazo VH, Francia-Martínez JR, Muriel-Fernández JL, Franco-Tarifa D (2011) Monitoring the pollution risk and water use in orchard terraces with mango and cherimoya trees by drainage lysimeters. Irrig Drain Syst 25:61–79
Rosa RD, Paredes P, Rodrigues GC, Alves I, Allen RG, Pereira LS (2012a) Implementing the dual crop coefficient approach in interactive software. 1. Background and computational strategy. Agric Water Manag 103:8–24
Rosa RD, Paredes P, Rodrigues GC, Alves I, Allen RG, Pereira LS (2012b) Implementing the dual crop coefficient approach in interactive software: 2. Model testing. Agric Water Manag 103:62–77
Sadik A, El-Aziz AA, El-Kerdany A (2018) Irrigation water management of date palm under El-Baharia oasis conditions. Egypt J Soil Sci 58:27–43
Santos IN, Fraga Júnior LS, Costa CS, Paz VPS, Vellame LM (2014) Demanda hídrica da aceroleira a partir de diferentes manejos de irrigação. II INOVAGRI Int Meeting. https://doi.org/10.12702/ii.inovagri.2014-a088
Santos ONA (2019) Water requirement of oil palm in two different edaphoclimatic conditions in Brazil. PhD Dissertation, College of Agriculture Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, Brazil
Seidhom SH, Abd-El-Rahman G (2011) Prediction of traditional climatic changes effect on pomegranate trees under desert condition in El Maghara, Egypt. J Am Sci 7(5):268–280
Silva A, Bruno I, Reichardt K, Bacchi O, Dourato-Neto D, Favarin J, Costa F, Timm L (2009) Soil water extraction by roots and Kc for the coffee crop. Rev Brasil Eng Agríc Amb 13:257–261
Silva TJ, Folegatti MV, Silva CR, Júnior JA, Matos Pires RC (2006) Evapotranspiração e coeficientes de cultura do maracujazeiro amarelo conduzido sob duas orientações de plantio. Irriga 11(1):90–106
Silva VDPR, Azevedo PV, Silva BB (2007) Surface energy fluxes and evapotranspiration of a mango orchard grown in a semiarid environment. Agron J 99(6):1391–1396
Singh BK, Tiwari KN, Chourasia SK, Mandal S (2007) Crop water requirement of guava (Psidium guajava L.) cv. KG/KAJI under drip irrigation and plastic mulch. Acta Hortic 735:399–406
Sousa DDP, Fernandes TFS, Tavares LB, Farias VDDS, Lima MJA, Nunes HGGC, Costa DLP, Ortega-Farias S, Souza PJDOP (2021) Estimation of evapotranspiration and single and dual crop coefficients of açai palm in the Eastern Amazon (Brazil) using the Bowen ratio system. Irrig Sci 39:5–22
Souza AP, Silva AC, Leonel S, Souza ME, Tanaka AA (2014) Evapotranspiração e eficiência do uso da água no primeiro ciclo produtivo da figueira ‘Roxo de valinhos’ submetida a cobertura morta. Biosci J Uberlandia 30(4):1127–1138
Souza MSM, Bezerra FML, Viana TVA, Teófilo EM, Cavalcante ÍHL (2009) Evapotranspiração do maracujá nas condições do Vale do Curu. Rev Caatinga 22:11–16
Sperling O, Shapira O, Tripler E, Schwartz A, Lazarovitch N (2014) A model for computing date palm water requirements as affected by salinity. Irrig Sci 32:341–350
Spohrer K, Jantschke C, Herrmann L, Engelhardt M, Pinmanee S, Stahr K (2006) Lychee tree parameters for water balance modeling. Plant Soil 284:59–72
Sun H, Shao L, Liu X, Miao W, Chen S, Zhang X (2012) Determination of water consumption and the water-saving potential of three mulching methods in a jujube orchard. Eur J Agron 43:87–95
Suwanlertcharoen T, Chaturabul T, Supriyasilp T, Pongput K (2023) Estimation of actual evapotranspiration using satellite-based surface energy balance derived from Landsat imagery in Northern Thailand. Water 15:450. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030450
Taha AM (2018) Assessment of different ETo-dependent irrigation levels for pomegranate on saving water and energy and maximizing farm income. J Soil Sci Agric Eng Mansoura Univ 9(11):657–665
Taylor NJ, Smit T, Smit A, Midgley SJE, Clulow A, Annandale JG, Dlamini K, Roets N (2021) Water Use of Macadamia Orchards (Volume 2): Water Research Commission Pretoria, RSA, WRC Report 2552/2/21, 218 p
Teixeira AH, Bassoi LH, Reis VC, Silva TG, Ferreira M, Maia JL (2003) Evaluation of water consumption of guava trees by automatic and conventional agrometeorological stations. Rev Bras Frutic 25:457–460
Teixeira AH, Bastiaanseen WGM, Moura MSB, Soares JM, Ahmad MD, Bos MG (2008) Energy and water balance measurements for water productivity analysis in irrigated mango trees, Northeast Brazil. Agric Forest Meteorol 148:1524–1537
Teixeira AH, Miranda FR, Leivas JF, Pacheco EP, Garçon EAM (2019) Water productivity assessments for dwarf coconut by using Landsat 8 images and agrometeorological data. J Photogram Remote Sens 155:150–158
Tiwari KN, Mandal D, Santosh DT, Singh VK (2012) Drip irrigation in young litchi trees. In: Hazarika TK, Nautiyal BP (eds) Horticulture for economic prosperity and nutritional security in 21st century. Westville Publishing House, New Delhi, India, pp 333–338
Vale Sant’Ana JA, Colombo A, Silva Junior JJ, Scalco MS, Silva RA (2022) Crop coefficient for coffee as a function of leaf area index. Curr Sci India 122:70–76
Vijayakumar KR, Dey SK, Chandrasekhar TR, Devakumar AS, Mohankrishna T, Rao PS, Sethuraj MR (1998) Irrigation requirement of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in the subhumid tropics. Agric Water Manag 35(3):245–259
Waldburger T, Monney P, Anken T, Cockburn M, Etienne A, Lecoeur J, Brini M, Forster D, Jöhr H (2019) Growing Cocoa in semi-arid climate—a scalable use case for digital agriculture. Agroscope Science No. 86, Tänikon, Ettenhausen, Switzerland
Zhang H, Wang D, Ayars JE, Phene CJ (2017) Biophysical response of young pomegranate trees to surface and sub-surface drip irrigation and deficit irrigation. Irri Sci 35(5):425–435
Acknowledgements
The support of the FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the project UIDB/04129/2020 of LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Research Unit, and to P. Paredes (https://doi.org/10.54499/DL57/2016/CP1382/CT0022) are acknowledged. R. López-Urrea and F. Montoya thank the support from the Education, Culture and Sports Council (JCCM, Spain) (Award numbers SBPLY/21/180501/000070 and SBPLY/21/180501/000152) and the Agencia Estatal de Investigación with FEDER (grant numbers PID2021–123305OB-C31, and PID2020–113498RB-C21), and NextGenerationEU (TED2021–130405B-I00) co-financing. The study was also funded through the agreement FAO-ISA-RP- 355071 between FAO and the Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa.
Funding
Open access funding provided by FCT|FCCN (b-on).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Co-design: LSP and PP; Contributed to the search and selection of the reviewed articles: PP, MP, FM, RLU, LSP; writing—original draft preparation, P.P.; Revised the horticultural topics, the crops grouping and the tabulation: CO; writing—review and editing, all autors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Paredes, P., Petry, M.T., Oliveira, C.M. et al. Single and basal crop coefficients for estimation of water requirements of subtropical and tropical orchards and plantations with consideration of fraction of ground cover, height, and training system. Irrig Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-024-00925-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-024-00925-7