Abstract
Purpose
Early stage adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is traditionally treated with osteotomy and tendon transfer. Despite a high success rate, the long recovery time and associated morbidity are not sufficient. This study aims to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes following the use of the arthroereisis screw with tendoscopic delivered PRP for early stage AAFD.
Methods
Patients with stage IIa AAFD who underwent the use of the arthroereisis screw with tendoscopic delivered PRP with a minimum follow-up time of 24 months were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes for pain were evaluated with the Foot and Ankle Outcomes Score (FAOS) and Visual Analog Score (VAS). Radiographic deformity correction was assessed using weight-bearing imaging.
Results
Thirteen patients (13 feet) with mean follow-up of 29.5 months were included. The mean age was 37.3 years (range, 28–65 years). FAOS-reported symptoms, pain, daily activities, sports activities, and quality of life significantly improved from 52.1, 42.6, 57.6, 35.7, and 15.4 pre-operatively to 78.5, 68.2, 83.3, 65.0, and 49.6 post-operatively, respectively (p < 0.05). Statistically significant radiographic improvements (lateral talus first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch, and cuneiform to ground distance) were also observed between the pre- and post-operative images.
Conclusions
This study elucidates the successful implementation of a less invasive approach to stage IIa AAFD. Through the use of a subtalar arthroereisis screw, PTT tendoscopy, and PRP injection, clinical and radiographic outcomes were improved.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The posterior tibial tendon (PTT) is the primary dynamic stabilizer of the medial arch of the foot. In adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), there is medial longitudinal arch collapse, hindfoot valgus and abduction of the midfoot at the talonavicular joint [1]. This is a temporal sequence progressing from minor degenerative changes in the PTT through four stages with significant malalignment of the architecture of the foot in association with profound degenerative changes in the PTT [2]. The progression of symptoms of AAFD has previously thought to be relentless and progressive, and surgical treatment is typically required to address this progressive deformity.
Traditionally, surgical correction has required hindfoot and forefoot osteotomies, in addition to tendon transfers [3]. While the surgical outcomes of these procedures have been encouraging, the time to recovery can be in excess of 12 months [4] and morbidity associated with extensive surgery is not insignificant [5]. In those patients with early stage AAFD, there is some controversy as to whether early intervention may provide early return to function and prevent the progression of the disease process.
The principle of hindfoot stability through an extra articular subtalar arthroereisis has been well documented by Grice and other investigators over time [6]. In recent years, much data has emerged from the paediatric population on the effectiveness of the subtalar arthroereisis screw inserted into the sinus tarsi to address hindfoot valgus [7]. There is a growing body of evidence to support its use in selected cases within the adult population with AAFD [8–14].
Autologous growth factors derived from platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have also been previously shown to help in tendinopathies around the foot and ankle [1]. This biologic adjunct is believed to upregulate a gene within the tendon to produce more tenocytic production [15]. The delivery of PRP to tendons has been a mater of some contention with various methods of intra-tendinous, extra-tendinous and peritendinous injection being advocated either by ultrasound guidance, blinded or by the use of tendoscopic guided injection [16]. Tendoscopic visualization has the advantage over other delivery systems in that minimally invasive debridement of the tendon can also be performed [17].
By addressing mechanical hindfoot malalignment by the use of the arthroereisis screw and improving the biologic milieu of tendon regeneration by tendoscopic debridement supplemented with PRP, it is hypothesized that this combination of therapies will offer patients with early stage AAFD an effective minimally invasive early intervention. This treatment may provide functional recovery and prevent further progression of the disease process. This study aims to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes following the use of the arthroereisis screw with tendoscopic delivered PRP for early stage (IIa) AAFD.
Materials and methods
Subjects
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board (protocol #29124). Data was obtained via the Foot and Ankle Data Registry at the authors’ institution. Between January 2008 and September 2016 22 consecutive patients underwent subtalar arthroereisis with PRP for AAFD. A single surgeon performed all surgical procedures and provided pre- and post-operative care in all patients. The procedure was indicated for patients with (1) stage IIa AAFD, (2) ability to stand on tip toe on the affected foot, and (3) no obvious tear of the PTT in pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or on sonographer, and (4) failed a minimum of three months conservative treatment, including footwear modification, physiotherapy, and oral medication. Contraindications included patients who had systemic disease, smokers, patients who suffer from insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and those who had previous surgery.
In the present study, patients who had a minimum post-operative follow-up time of 24 months were included. The exclusion criteria were patients who (1) were under 18 years of age and (2) had calcaneal osteotomy surgery for symptomatic flexible flatfoot previously or at the same time, (3) tendon transfer.
Operative technique
Blood collection and preparation of PRP
Following induction of anesthesia, 20 mL of whole blood was drawn into a syringe from a vein in the cubital fossa. The whole blood was then centrifuged in a standard fashion with a commercially available system (Arteriocyte, Inc., Hopkinton, MA, USA). The plasma and upper portion of the buffy coat layer were decanted into a separate chamber of the centrifugal bowl. PRP was produced as the platelets were separated from the plasma. Approximately 2–3 mL of PRP was produced from 26 mL of whole blood, with 1.5 mL used for injection into the tendon sheath.
Posterior tibial tendoscopy
Posterior tibial tendoscopy was performed using the technique previously described [17, 18]. A distal infra-malleolar portal was made over the tendon, approximately 20 mm distal to the posterior edge of the medial malleolus and 30 mm proximal to the navicular tuberosity. At this location, a 22-gauge needle was inserted subcutaneously to identify the tibialis posterior tendon sheath and 5 mL of saline was injected to confirm correct placement. After confirmation of correct portal placement, the portal was incised and a “nick and spread” technique was used to develop the portal and open the sheath of the PTT in order to minimize the risk of the injury to the tendon or neurovascular bundle [19]. A 30° 2.7-mm endoscope was then inserted. The location of the second portal was determined via direct visualization with the endoscope. A 2.7-mm shaver was used to perform tenosynovectomy of the posterior tibial tendon (Fig. 1a, b). A 2.7-mm round burr was used next to deepen the medial retromalleolar groove in which the PTT lies, removing approximately 2–4 mm of underlying cancellous bone. After adequate debridement and decompression, PRP was injected into the PTT under direct visualization with a 22-gauge needle (Fig. 1c). The portals were then irrigated and closed with the figure of eight suture technique using 4–0 nylon.
Arthroereisis screw placement
An arthroereisis screw alignment rod was placed percutaneously under fluoroscopic guidance from lateral to medial through the sinus tarsi (Fig. 2a). A 15-mm incision was then made adjacent to this. The tarsal canal was then dilated and trial sizers were sequentially placed. The optimal sizer limited subtalar joint motion to approximately 2–4 degrees of passive eversion from a neutral calcaneal position. Once the appropriate sizer was determined, intra-operative antero-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken to evaluate sizer placement. The subtalar arthroereisis screw was then placed over the alignment rod, with imaging utilized to confirm appropriate placement, defined by the lateral border of the implant being inline with the lateral border of the talus (Fig. 2b). The wound was then irrigated and closed.
Post-operative treatment
Patients were transitioned from well-padded splints to controlled ankle motion boots at approximately 14 days following surgery. Sutures were also removed at this time. A weight bearing protocol was commenced at two weeks post-surgery, in which patients were advanced at increments of 10% of their bodyweight each day. Physical therapy was initiated after four weeks. This concentrated on PTT strengthening, balance and proportion training. Patients were allowed to return to sport and more physical activities at approximately eight to ten weeks after surgery, depending on individual progression.
Clinical evaluation
Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively using patient reported and general health outcome questionnaires, including the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) [20] and visual analog scale (VAS) score, respectively. Clinical evaluation was carried out at the most recent follow-up.
Radiographic evaluation
Pre-operative and post-operative radiographs while standing were analyzed to determine radiographic correction of the deformities using lateral talar-first metatarsal angle (LTMA), calcaneal pitch and cuneiform to ground distance. All patients had plain radiographs to monitor two weeks following surgery, and the postoperative weight-bearing radiographs were taken a minimum of three months following surgery. Radiographic measurements were evaluated at the most recent follow-up.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The Student paired t-test were used to determine significant difference between the pre-operative and post-operative FAOS, VAS scale and radiographic measurements because they followed a normal distribution. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered a statistically significant outcome.
Results
Patient demographics
Seventeen patients (18 feet) had subtalar arthroereisis with PRP for stage IIa AAFD, but two patients (3 feet) were excluded, because they were under 18 years of age. Among the remaining 15 patients (15 feet), two patients (2 feet) were excluded because they had combined procedures including medial slide calcaneal osteotomy, tendon transfer, first tarsometatarsal or reverse Cotton osteotomy.
A total of 13 feet in 13 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria of the study were treated surgically using subtalar arthroereisis screw combined with tendoscopy and PRP augmentation. These patients were a mean age of 37.3 years (range, 28–65 years). Mean follow-up was 29.5 months (range, 24–48 months). Patient demographics and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Functional and clinical outcomes
Mean symptoms, pain, daily activities, sports activities and quality of life scores in FAOS significantly improved from 52.1, 42.6, 57.6, 35.7, and 15.4 pre-operatively to 78.5, 68.2, 83.3, 65.0, and 49.6 post-operatively, respectively, at final follow-up (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The VAS significantly improved from a pre-operative mean of 7.7 points (range, 6–9) to a postoperative mean of 1.7 points (range, 0–4) at final follow-up (p < 0.05).
Radiographic outcome
The results of measurements of all pre-operative and post-operative radiographic parameters are summarized in Table 2. LTMA and calcaneal pitch significantly improved from a pre-operative mean of −6.1° (range, −9 to−2) and 13.8° (range, 9–17) to a post-operative mean of −1.7° (range, −5 to1) and 20.2° (range, 16 to 24) at final follow-up, respectively (p < 0.05). The cuneiform to ground distance significantly improved from a pre-operative mean of 17.7 mm (range, 14–22) to a post-operative mean of 21.3 mm (range, 18–26) at final follow up (p < 0.05).
Complications
Post-operative sinus tarsi pain that was unresolved by the conservative treatments including rest, restriction of activities, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was identified in three patients. All three patients who failed local injection treatment underwent removal of arthoereisis screw. The average post-operative time point of removal of screw was 21 months (range, 16–30) after surgery. Their symptoms were completely relieved after removal of screw without recurrence of symptoms, or change in clinical or radiological alignment (Fig. 3).
Discussion
Stage IIa AAFD is characterized by moderate flexible deformity with minimal abduction through the midfoot [1]. Although conservative interventions are often effective, a significant number of patients with stage IIa disease will ultimately require operative intervention [21]. Traditional surgical management of stage IIa AAFD with correctable hindfoot valgus involves a flexor digitorum longus or hallux tendon transfer to the navicular and a medializing calcaneal osteotomy aiming to normalize the mechanical aspect of this pathology. This may also be augmented with a lateral column lengthening and cotton osteotomy [5, 22]. Previous clinical studies have been associated with excellent outcomes. However, full recovery from these procedures can take up to one year [4]. Additionally, there is the possibility of complications including mal-unions, non-unions, neurovascular lesions, and prolonged immobilization [23]. An alternative surgical option for early AAFD is subtalar arthroereisis, a procedure associated with good functional and radiologic outcomes (Table 3).
The use of a subtalar arthroereisis screw is not without complications, as it relies on restriction of subtalar joint motion to restore mechanical alignment. In 10–33% of patients, this leads to sinus tarsi pain necessitating implant removal (Table 3). Interestingly, this does not necessarily lead to deformity recurrence, as the three patients in this study who underwent implant removal at an average of 21 months after surgery maintained their correction. This maintenance of alignment correction is attributed to restoration of PTT function as a dynamic stabilizer of foot, as it is no longer subjected to great stress as the hindfoot is placed in a more neutral alignment. Additionally, a certain period of time after screw implantation may be necessary to keep foot alignment. To address this, further investigation is necessary.
In the early stages of AAFD, a wide range of PTT pathology can be observed, ranging from mild tendinosis to complete tears. Historically, the FDL transfer to the navicular was indicated in the setting of severe PTT tendinosis, while isolated tenosynovectomy and debridement was used for milder cases. Unfortunately, MRI has been shown to have a low sensitivity for identifying tendon pathology [17]. Gianakos et al. reported a 67% accuracy in the diagnosis of PTT pathology using 3-Tesla MRI imaging. As such, we evaluated the PTT with tendoscopy. This diagnostic approach may benefit the patient via smaller incisions, reduced scar formation and less post-operative pain, particularly when compared to the more invasive approaches traditionally used to evaluate the PTT intra-operatively.
The efficacy of tendoscopic treatment has been well reported in the clinical literature [18]. The treatment presented in this study included debridement of the pathological lesions with tenosynovectomy of the stenosed, degenerated or frayed tendon. Concomitantly, the medial retro-malleolar groove was also deepened to facilitate this procedure. Additionally, for the lesion resulting from tendinosis, multiple needle insertion was performed to stimulate the cellular response to healing [24]. PRP was also used as a biological adjunct to improve the healing biological environment of PTT. Currently, the efficacy of PRP on tendon pathologies is well supported by in vivo and in vitro systematic reviews [25]. PRP has showed neoangiogenic and tenoproliferative effects for tendon healing in a previous study [14]. However, this study is unfortunately of a small cohort and therefore, it makes it difficult to establish if the primary cause of good outcomes was due to the single factor of PRP with multiple needle insertion and medial retro-malleolar groove deepening.
This study has several limitations, including its retrospective design and small sample size. However, its small sample size is attributed to our strict inclusion criteria. Additionally, we used the FAOS score as our primary outcome measure. This score is increasing in popularity in foot and ankle studies [20], although American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score is widely used in previous clinical studies (Table 3). But, FAOS may accurately reflect on the patient’s clinical outcome more because the FAOS includes more subjective assessments in contrast to AOFAS.
In conclusion, subtalar arthroereisis with tendoscopic delivered PRP is a safe and effective operative technique for treatment of symptomatic stage IIa AAFD. This approach to the flexible flatfoot can address the mechanical and biological sequelae of early stage AAFD.
References
Myerson RA (1996) Instructional course lecture, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity, treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:780–792
Myerson MS, Corrigan J (1996) Treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunctionwith flexor digitorum tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy. Orthopedics 19(5):383–388
Myerson MS, Badekas A, Schon LC (2004) Treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon deficiency with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 25(7):445–450
Kou JX, Balasubramaniam M, Kippe M, Fortin PT (2012) Functional results of posterior tibial tendon reconstruction, calcaneal osteotomy, and gastrocnemius recession. Foot Ankle Int 33(7):602–611
Haeseker GA, Mureau MA, Faber FW (2010) Lateral column lengthening for acquired adult flatfoot deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction stage II: a retrospective comparison of calcaneus osteotomy with calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg 49(4):380–384
Grice DS (1952) An extra-articular arthrodesis of the subastragalar joint for correction of paralytic flat feet in Children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 34:927–940
Giannini S, Ceccarelli F, Benedetti MG, Cantani F, Faldini C (2001) Surgical treatment of flexible flatfoot in children. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:73–79
Viladot R, Pons M, Alvarez F, Omaña J (2003) Subtalar arthroereisis for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Int 24(8):600–606
Zaret DI, Myerson MS (2003) Arthroerisis of the subtalar joint. Foot Ankle Clin 8(3):605–617
Needleman RL (2006) A surgical approach for flexible flatfeet in adults including a subtalar arthroereisis with the MBA sinus tarsi implant. Foot Ankle Int 27(1):9–18
Adelman VR, Szczepanski JA, Adelman RP (2008) Radiographic evaluation of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession, subtalar joint arthroereisis, and flexor tendon transfer for surgical correction of stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: a pilot study. J Foot Ankle Surg 47(5):400–408
Cook EA, Cook JJ, Basile P (2011) Identifying risk factors in subtalar arthroereisis explantation: a propensity-matched analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 50:395–401
Zhu Y, Xu XY (2015) Treatment of stage II adult acquired flatfoot deformity with subtalar arthroereises. Foot Ankle Spec 8(3):194–202
Saxena A, Via AG, Maffulli N, Chiu H (2016) Subtalar arthroereisis implant removal in adults: a prospective study of 100 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(3):500–503
Zhang J, Wang JH (2010) Platelet-rich plasma releasate promotes differentiation of tendon stem cells into active tenocytes. Am J Sports Med 38(12):2477–2486
Wang A, McCann P, Colliver J, Koh E, Ackland T, Joss B, Zheng M, Breidahl B (2015) Do postoperative platelet-rich plasma injections accelerate early tendon healing and functional recovery after arthroscopic supraspinatus repair? A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 43(6):1430–1437
Gianakos AL, Ross KA, Hannon CP, Duke GL, Prado MP, Kennedy JG (2015) Functional outcomes of tibialis posterior tendoscopy with comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Foot Ankle Int 36(7):812–819
van Dijk CN, Kort N, Scholten PE (1997) Tendoscopy of the posterior tibial tendon. Arthroscopy 13(6):692–698
Sammarco VJ (2009) Peroneal tendoscopy: indications and techniques. Sports Med Arthrosc 17(2):94–99
Mani SB, Brown HC, Nair P, Chen L, Do HT, Lyman S, Deland JT, Ellis SJ (2013) Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int 34(8):1140–1146
O’Connor K, Baumhauer J, Houck JR (2010) Patient factors in the selection of operative vs nonoperative treatment for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int 31:197–202
Hirose CB, Johnson JE (2004) Plantar flexion opening wedge medial cuneiform osteotomy for correction of fixed forefoot varus associated with flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int 25(8):568–574
Thomas RL, Wells BC, Garrison RL, Prada SA (2001) Preliminary results comparing two methods of lateral column lengthening. Foot Ankle Int 22:107–119
Chou LW, Hsieh YL, Kuan TS, Hong CZ (2014) Needling therapy for myofascial pain: recommended technique with multiple rapid needle insertion. Biomedicine (Taipei) 4(13):Epub Aug 2
Baksh N, Hannon CP, Murawski CD, Smyth NA, Kennedy JG (2013) Platelet-rich plasma in tendon models: a systematic review of basic science literature. Arthroscopy 29(3):596–607
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author (J.G. Kennedy ) is a consultant for Arteriocyte, Inc.; J.G. Kennedy has received research support from the Ohnell Family Foundation, Mr. and Mrs. Michael J Levitt, and Arteriocyte Inc.; J.G. Kennedy is a board member for the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, and Arthroscopy, International Society for Cartilage Repair of the Ankle, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Awards and Scholarships Committee, International Cartilage Repair Society finance board.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yasui, Y., Tonogai, I., Rosenbaum, A.J. et al. Use of the arthroereisis screw with tendoscopic delivered platelet-rich plasma for early stage adult acquired flatfoot deformity. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 315–321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3349-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3349-2